DOCSLIB.ORG

Soan30352 Final Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soan30352 Final Copy FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE UNIT OUTLINE 2012-2013 SOAN 30352/60352: ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE MODERN STATE Semester: TWO Lecturer(s): Dr Madeleine Reeves Room: 2.054 Arthur Lewis Building Telephone: 0161 275 3488 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Monday and Thursday, 2-3pm, teaching weeks only Administrator: [email protected] undergraduate [email protected] postgraduate Lectures: Thurs day 09.00 -12.00 Roscoe 3.4 PG seminar Thursday 13.00-14.00, 2.066, beginning February 5 th . UNDERGRADUATE POSTGRADUATE COURSE CODE SOAN30352 SOAN60352 20 15 NUMBER OF CREDITS 10% - 4 seminar reports 20% - Book Review (12 th MODE OF ASSESSMENT 20% - Book Review (12 th March) All deadlines are 2.00 pm March) 80% - Final Essay (7 th May) (UK time) 70% - Final Essay (14 th May) Word Limits for Assessed Work: Students exceeding the maximum word limits on assessed work will be penalised. There is no formal minimum word limit, but students should consider whether essays that fall substantially below the maximum have adequately covered the topic. An automated word-count must be printed on each piece of work – failure to do so will result in an automatic deduction of 2%. PENALTIES FOR LATE SUBMISSION OF ASSESSED WORK There is an absolute deadline of 2.00 pm on all hand-ins. Late submission of essays and other coursework will be penalised. The penalty is 10 points per day for up to 10 days (including weekends) for any assessed work submitted after the specified submission deadline. Social Sciences students should contact the Social Sciences Undergraduate Office (G.001 Arthur Lewis Building) or the Social Sciences Postgraduate Office (2 nd floor landing) if they feel they have mitigating circumstances. All other students should follow the procedures of their Home Schools. A "day" is 24 hours, i.e. the clock starts ticking as soon as the submission deadline (2.00 pm ) has passed. Unless a student has an authorised extension, any assessed work that is submitted late will be penalised. There are no pre -requisites for this course. However, students should consider whether it is advisable to take an advanced level course, without any prior knowledge of the subject, at this crucial stage in their academic career. Reeves, Anthropology of the State 2014-2015/1 SOAN 30352/ 60352 The Anthropology of the Modern State Dr. Madeleine Reeves Course overview What is the state, and how might we try to understand it ethnographically? These two big questions have been some of the most generative in recent political anthropology; and are also urgent questions of our time. What, if anything, constitutes state sovereignty today? Should we make a categorical difference between (legitimate) state and (illegitimate) non- state violence? Is state power being eroded as a result of globalization? Or is it being re-constituted in new ways? Can we even generalize in any meaningful sense about “the” state, or does that term conceal the empirical variety of political formations that exist in the world today? This course explores some of the answers that have been developed in anthropology and kindred fields to these questions. We will situate these questions and answers historically, looking at the way in which anthropologists have come to ask certain kinds of questions about the state at certain historical moments and political junctures. We will explore them comparatively, drawing on a range of empirical examples from North and Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, East, South, and Central Asia, Europe, the Middle East and North America. During the course we will consider debates around the “capillary” workings of governmental power influenced by Michel Foucault; at the politicization of life and death often glossed as “biopolitics”; at the technologies and infrastructures through which the state comes to take on material form in daily life; and at recent concerns to explore how, in contexts of formal state weakness, localized zones of sovereignty are sustained. Following this we will consider the complex relationship between states, illegality and violence, exploring what happens when informal sources of protection are experienced as more secure against arbitrary violence than those notionally authorized by the state. In the later part of the course we turn to debates about democracy, participation and popular statism. We look at recent concern to attend to the affective and emotive dimensions of statehood, attending to what Jonathan Spencer has identified as the “moral investment that many people make in the idea of being owners, or at least members, of a state of their own”. We consider this alongside recent ethnographic explorations (and scholarly defences of) anarchism, ending to come full circle to questions of the complex intersections between anthropology, the state, and political critique. Reeves, Anthropology of the State 2014-2015/2 Organisation of the course The course is organized around a core 3-hour session on Thursday each week. This will consist of a lecture of approximately 70 minutes, followed by a break, after which the UG students will be split into two 40 minute (+/-) seminars, one following immediately after the other (a separate tutorial will be held for MA students at 1pm on Thursdays, beginning February 5th). UG students will be randomly allocated to one or other seminar during the first class. For any given seminar there will be 2 or more presenters who are responsible for giving a 5-7-minute presentation on the basis of their seminar report to the rest of the group that week. This is a reading-based course and you will be asked to leave the seminar if you have not done the key readings, or brought along a copy of the readings (in hard copy or electronically) and your own notes. Seminar preparation You should come to the class having read the key readings designated for each week, and having formulated three questions that you would like to pose to the class for the group to discuss in relation to the readings. These can be questions of comprehension or meaning (e.g. “what does Trouillot mean by describing the state as a ‘lived fiction of late modernity’ on p. 130”?), but at least one should be a substantive question relating to (what you understand to be) the theoretical stakes of the argument in question (“Abrams seems to suggest that the purpose of a political sociology of the state is ‘demystification’. But how can such an approach help us better to make sense of, or put stops upon, state-sponsored violence?”) There are no “right” and “wrong” questions to ask of the texts—there are only more or less penetrating or interesting ones. We will write an assortment of the questions that are asked on the board each week, so you should come to the seminar prepared to use your questions to open up discussion. This is also a course in which you are actively invited to hone your ethnographic sensibilities in daily life, and to think theoretically with what you observe. The “state” and its traces, its modes of governance, its gaps, as well as the hopes and desires it elicits are all around us, symbolically, materially, discursively. You are actively encouraged to document your own ‘state encounters’ ethnographically and visually in this course and to use the theoretical tools you will be honing to reflect upon them. Thus, you are invited and encouraged to bring these instances that can document this (notes, photographs, leaflets you have picked up, comments overheard, signs or summons you have observed ….) to the seminar and to discuss them with your peers in the light of our theoretical discussion. Reeves, Anthropology of the State 2014-2015/3 Assessment For Undergraduates assessment will consist of the following: 1. 4 X 400 word seminar reports (10%) 2. 1 X 1000 word book review (20%) 3. 1 X 3000 word final essay (70%) For Postgraduates assessment will consist of the following: 1. 1 X 1000 word book review (20%) 2. 1 X 3000 word final essay (80%) Seminar presentation One of the key goals of the course is for students to gain experience of presenting their ideas and responses to text in a variety of formats: in the form of questions relating to the key reading; in the form of a book review of the kind that might be found in an academic journal; in the form of an extended final essay; and, for BA students, in the form of a non-assessed seminar presentation. It may be helpful to think of the latter as a mini-lecture (7 mins) which YOU give to your peers, introducing them to a text that most of your fellow students will not already be familiar. You should prepare power-point slides or a hand-out, and you should think about how you introduce the text, present the key arguments, and its links to the key readings in such a way that it is accessible and comprehensible to your fellow students. You are encouraged to audio-record or film your presentation and listen to it/ watch it afterwards, as there will be dedicated office-hour feedback sessions for each of the presenters to reflect on and improve their presentation skills. The week in which a given student is to given their seminar presentation will be allocated during the first class. Book review A 1000 word book review is required of both BA and MA students, and should discuss one of the ethnographic monographs listed at the end of the course outline, or another relevant monograph by prior agreement. Detailed guidance on how to write a balanced, engaging book review will be given during class. This is due for submission on Blackboard by 12th March .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View 2019 Edition Online
    Emmanuel Emmanuel College College MAGAZINE 2018–2019 Front Court, engraved by R B Harraden, 1824 VOL CI MAGAZINE 2018–2019 VOLUME CI Emmanuel College St Andrew’s Street Cambridge CB2 3AP Telephone +44 (0)1223 334200 The Master, Dame Fiona Reynolds, in the new portrait by Alastair Adams May Ball poster 1980 THE YEAR IN REVIEW I Emmanuel College MAGAZINE 2018–2019 VOLUME CI II EMMANUEL COLLEGE MAGAZINE 2018–2019 The Magazine is published annually, each issue recording college activities during the preceding academical year. It is circulated to all members of the college, past and present. Copy for the next issue should be sent to the Editors before 30 June 2020. News about members of Emmanuel or changes of address should be emailed to [email protected], or via the ‘Keeping in Touch’ form: https://www.emma.cam.ac.uk/members/keepintouch. College enquiries should be sent to [email protected] or addressed to the Development Office, Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. General correspondence concerning the Magazine should be addressed to the General Editor, College Magazine, Dr Lawrence Klein, Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. Correspondence relating to obituaries should be addressed to the Obituaries Editor (The Dean, The Revd Jeremy Caddick), Emmanuel College, Cambridge CB2 3AP. The college telephone number is 01223 334200, and the email address is [email protected]. If possible, photographs to accompany obituaries and other contributions should be high-resolution scans or original photos in jpeg format. The Editors would like to express their thanks to the many people who have contributed to this issue, with a special nod to the unstinting assistance of the College Archivist.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Anthropology 2 Handbook 2016
    University of Edinburgh School of Social & Political Science Subject Area 2016 – 2017 Social Anthropology 2, Key Topics in Social Anthropology SCAN 08004 Semester 1, Year 2 Key Information Course Organiser Dr. Naomi Haynes Email: [email protected] Room no. 4.10 Chrystal MacMillan Building, 15A George Square Guidance & Feedback Hours: Mondays 13.00 – 15:00 and by appointment Lecturers Prof Jonathan Spencer Email: [email protected] Dr John Harries Email: [email protected] Location Mondays and Thursdays 15:10 – 16:00 Lecture Hall C, David Hume Tower LTs Tutors Tutor’s name: Jenny Lawy Email: [email protected] Tutor’s name: Heid Jerstad Email: [email protected] Tutor’s name: Leo Hopkinson Email: [email protected] Course Secretary Secretary’s name: Lauren Ayre Email: [email protected] Undergraduate Teaching Office Assessment • Essay #1 – 17 October 2016 12 noon Deadlines • Essay #2 – 14 November 2016 12 noon • Essay #3 – 12 December 2016 12 noon Aims and Objectives This course will provide a historical overview of anthropological thought and will be taught through an introduction to keywords that have helped to shape the development of social anthropology. The thematic approach is designed to be engaging and stimulating to students and to help to foster critical conceptual and theoretical thought. It will highlight the continued significance of key concepts and oppositions over time. The course is organized around the exploration of a cluster of linked keywords: society and culture; humans and the environment; and persons and 2016-17 Social Anthropology 2A 1 production.
    [Show full text]
  • John Gledhill There Are Significant National Differences Between The
    FATEFUL LEGACIES AND THE BURDENS OF ACADEmic EXCELLENCE: UK ANTHROPOLOGY AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE John Gledhill There are significant national differences between the public profiles of anthropology in different countries and regions of the world today. The obvious way to account for them is to apply sociological analysis to the development of the discipline in different contexts, and at the same time consider the differences between the contexts themselves. In the case of British social anthropology, much, if not all, of what we need to know to diagnose the roots of the problem has already been published. Key texts include Jonathan Spencer’s incisive implementation of Edmund Leach’s suggestion that: ‘the sociology of the environ- ment of social anthropologists has a bearing on the history of social anthropology’, in an article published in Annual Review of Anthropology in 2000 (Spencer 2000: 21). David Mills has recently been exploring the history of the discipline in a whole range of incisive articles, with a major book on the way. One very acce- ssible example that illustrates the way David makes history ask searching practical questions about the future is his Anthropology Today piece on the history of the two UK associations, ASA and RAI, and the implications of their continuing separation (Mills 2003). Adam Kuper’s celebrated and thrice updated contribution to the intellectual and social history of ‘The Modern British School’ remains a rich and indispensable reference (Kuper 1996), even if Spencer’s article also makes the important point that we need to continue thinking about what, if anything, makes British anthropology distinctive today.
    [Show full text]
  • Adorno's Dilemma: on Difficult Writing and Sophistication in Anthropology
    38 Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers Vol. 99/100 KROEBER ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 100(1): 38-63 Adorno’s Dilemma: On Difficult Writing and Sophistication in Anthropology Today1 Marc Goodwin, University of California, Berkeley Introduction Writing in 1966, in an essay entitled “Difficulties,” Theodor Adorno saw modern mu- sic as, “faced with an alternative,” “that between the fetishism of the material and the process, on the one hand, and unfettered chance [in the form of aleatory music] on the other” (2002:660). In other words, after the collapse of tonality in the early twenti- eth century, composers could choose either to ignore this fact and compose music that could make no claims to being autonomous art, or face complete isolation from musical expressivity. This paper uses Adorno’s dilemma as a starting point and central organiz- ing device for exploring the political, ethical, and aesthetic dimensions of debates on “difficult writing” in anthropology. More specifically, for heuristic purposes, it draws a connection between the “crisis of musical meaning” in the early to mid-twentieth cen- tury, and the so-called “crisis of representation” in anthropology in the 1980s and 1990s in order to think of the problem of difficulty as a particular response to objective histori- cal conditions. In particular, I argue that the shift to textuality in anthropology created a bifurcation between the epistemological and political dimensions of representation, and introduced sophistication as the key diacritic of critical engagement and inquiry. Because the notion of sophistication implies both technical refinement and deception, I show how criticisms of difficulty in writing imply already a specific notion of failed or inauthentic public address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Puha: Identity, Orientation, and Shifting Perceptions Reflected Through Material Culture and Socioreligious Practice
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2021 THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE Aaron Robert Atencio Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Atencio, Aaron Robert, "THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE" (2021). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11734. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11734 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ECOLOGY OF PUHA: IDENTITY, ORIENTATION, AND SHIFTING PERCEPTIONS REFLECTED THROUGH MATERIAL CULTURE AND SOCIORELIGIOUS PRACTICE By AARON ROBERT ATENCIO Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, U.S.A., 2021 Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Philosophy of Anthropology The University of Montana Missoula, MT Official Graduation Date (May 2021) Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology, Culture and Society
    Small Places, Large Issues Eriksen SPLI4 00 pre 1 29/06/2015 10:44 Anthropology, Culture and Society Series Editors: Professor Vered Amit, Concordia University and Professor Christina Garsten, Stockholm University Recent titles: Becoming Arab in London: At the Heart of the State: The Gloss of Harmony: Performativity and the The Moral World of Institutions The Politics of Policy Making Undoing of Identity DIDIER FASSIN ET AL. in Multilateral Organisations AMY LY EDITED BY BIRGIT MÜLLER R M. K. A Discordant Development: Community, Cosmopolitanism Global Capitalism and the Contesting Publics: and the Problem of Human Struggle for Connection in Feminism, Activism, Commonality Bangladesh Ethnography VERED AMIT AND KATY GARDNER LYNNE PHILLIPS NIGEL RAPPORT Anthropology and Development: AND SALLY COLE Home Spaces, Street Styles: Challenges for the Twenty-first Food For Change: Contesting Power and Identity Century The Politics and Values in a South African City KATY GARDNER AND DAVID LEWIS of Social Movements LESLIE J. BANK Organisational Anthropology: JEFF PRATT AND PETER LUETCHFORD In Foreign Fields: Doing Ethnography in and The Politics and Experiences of Among Complex Organisations Checkpoint, Temple, Church Transnational Sport Migration EDITED BY CHRISTINA GARSTEN and Mosque: AND NETTE YQVIST THOMAS F. CARTER A N A Collaborative Ethnography Border Watch: of War and Peace Dream Zones: JONATHAN SPENCER, Anticipating Capitalism and Cultures of Immigration, Detention and Control JONATHAN GOODHAND, Development in India HAHUL ASbuLLAH LEXANDRA
    [Show full text]
  • ​P Art​1. Framing Fieldwork in the Batticaloa Region
    part 1. framing fieldwork in the batticaloa region Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/633593/9780822389187-001.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 introduction ri Lanka has been a remarkably fertile site for Sresearch in social and cultural anthropology, starting with C. G. and Brenda Z. Seligmann’s colo- nial monograph on the Veddas (1911) and continuing to this day with important ethnographic studies by Edmund R. Leach (1961), Nur Yalman (1967), Stanley J. Tambiah (1958), Gananath Obeyesekere (1967, 1981, 1984), James Brow (1978), Michael Roberts (1982), Bruce Kapferer (1983), Jonathan Spencer (1990a), R. L. Stirrat (1992), E. Valentine Daniel (1996), Rohan Bastin (2002), and many others. Despite “postcolo- nial and postempiricist” objections to anthropology in Sri Lanka (Ismail 2005), my intention was always to produce a book in the same scholarly tradition, a study that would extend understanding of the island’s remarkable sociological complexity through long- term, community-based fieldwork, as well as through critical engagement with anthropological writing on South Asia more generally. Now, however, given the brutal ethnic conflict which has consumed Sri Lan- kan society since the 1980s, this study also helps to illuminate what has become the most critical and divided conflict zone of the Eelam War—the island’s Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/chapter-pdf/633593/9780822389187-001.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Map 1. Sri Lanka and South India eastern coastal region—and the two Tamil-speaking minority communities who have lived there side by side for centuries—the Tamils and the Muslims (or Sri Lankan Moors).
    [Show full text]
  • Urry, James (B
    Urry, James (b. 1949) British-born anthropologist and historian of anthropology. A graduate of University College, University of London [BSc (Hons)] and Oxford University [D.Phil. 1978], Urry taught school for a year in Jersey and then moved to Australia to work at the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies in Canberra. Later he taught in the Department of Prehistory and Anthropology at the Australian National University in Canberra before taking up a post in the Department of Anthropology at the Victoria University of Wellington in Aotearoa/New Zealand. He has held visiting research fellowships at the Universities of Winnipeg and Calgary. He retired from Victoria University in 2011 but continues to publish on Mennonites and on the history of anthropology. His most important publications in the latter field are: ——— 1973a “Notes and Queries on Anthropology and the Development of Field Methods in British Anthropology, 1870-1920” [Hocart Prize Essay 1972]. In: Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1972. London: Royal Anthropological Institute, pp. 45-57. (Reprinted as 1993c and in Alan Bryman (ed.) Ethnography: Volume 1: The Nature of Ethnography. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 101-127 and translated into French as “La constitution du questionnaire ‘Notes and Queries on Anthropology.’ Les premiers pas de l’anthropologie britannique” in L’enquête de terrain. Textes réunis, présentés et commentés par Daniel Céfaï. (La Revue du M.A.U.S.S. - Mouvement anti-utilitariste dans les sciences sociales), 2003, pp. 65-88). ——— 1973b “Institute Prehistory.” Man (new series) 8(2): 306-307 (Rejoinder to Stocking 1973). ——— 1982a “From Zoology to Ethnology: A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Haney Foundation Series : Ethnography in Today's World : Color
    Ethnography in Today’s World ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE i HANEY FOUNDATION SERIES A volume in the Haney Foundation Series, established in 1961 with the generous support of Dr. John Louis Haney ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE ii Ethnography in Today’s World Color Full Before Color Blind Roger Sanjek UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS PHILADELPHIA ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE iii Copyright ᭧ 2014 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112 www.upenn.edu/pennpress Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10987654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sanjek, Roger, 1944– Ethnography in today’s world : color full before color blind / Roger Sanjek.—1st ed. p. cm. — (Haney foundation series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8122-4545-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Ethnology—United States—Methodology. 2. Ethnology—Methodology. 3. Anthropology—United States—Methodology. 4. Anthropology—Methodology. I. Title. GN345.S255 2014 305.800973—dc23 2013019444 ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE iv For my teachers: Anne Schwerner, Robert Stigler, Marvin Harris, Lambros Comitas, Jaap van Velsen, George C. Bond, Allen Johnson ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE v This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface ix PART I.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology 519 Authority, Power and Political Form
    16.070.519 Parvis Ghassem-Fachandi !1 Anthropology 519 Authority, Power and Political Form ! (The Anthropology of Politics) Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University Instructor: Parvis Ghassem-Fachandi Class time: Mondays 2:55 - 5:55 o’clock Email: [email protected] Office: RAB 309, Hours: Mo. 12:30-1:30, Thurs. 12:30-1:30 Phone: (732) 932 98 86 Location of course: RAB 302 !Credits: 3 Semester: Spring 2016 Pre-requisites: 101 This seminar situates politics around other tensions than the friend-foe binary, which Carl Schmitt argued, at the beginning of the 20th century, was the elementary foundation of the political. We will engage comparatively a selection of ethnographic accounts and theories that focus on alternative political forms. “Political form” here means broadly the various social and cultural configurations that organize collective and individual life vis-a-vis the exercise of power and the construction of authority. We will try to account for the diversity of various conceptions of what constitutes the political and the effects of these conceptions on the organization of society. Such an approach implies both a sensitivity to the changes that accompanied the emergence of modern states with their administrative technologies (populations, nations, elections) and to the social forms (authoritarian, monarchical, democratic, totalitarian) that grew out of the use of the modern state form of organizing territory and people. The course will consider the gains and losses accrued through colonialism, independence movements, and the embrace of social transformation. Theoretical debates will include a reflection on patriarchic authority, political theology, the nationalization of religious belonging, genocide and collective violence as it relates to group solidarity or dissolution, regulated anarchy in stateless societies (segmentary organization), big man and chief systems, as well as the anonymous mass.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intimate Life of Dissent: Anthropological Perspectives. London: UCL Press
    The Intimate Life of Dissent AMARASURIYA 9781787357792 PRINT.indd 1 30/07/2020 13:31 AMARASURIYA 9781787357792 PRINT.indd 2 30/07/2020 13:31 EthicsTheCanada Intimate and in the FrameAesthetics Life ofofCopyright, TranslationDissent Collections and the Image of Canada, 1895– 1924 ExploringAnthropological the Work Perspectivesof Atxaga, Kundera and Semprún Edited by Harini Amarasuriya, Tobias Kelly, Sidharthan Philip J. Hatfield HarrietMaunaguru, Hulme Galina Oustinova-Stjepanovic and Jonathan Spencer AMARASURIYA 9781787357792 PRINT.indd 3 30/07/2020 13:31 00-UCL_ETHICS&AESTHETICS_i-278.indd9781787353008_Canada-in-the-Frame_pi-208.indd 3 3 11-Jun-1819/10/2018 4:56:18 09:50PM First published in 2020 by UCL Press University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Available to download free: www.uclpress.co.uk Collection © Editors, 2020 Text © Contributors, 2020 The authors have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the authors of this work. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Amarasuriya et al. (eds.). 2020. The Intimate Life of Dissent: Anthropological Perspectives. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787357778 Further details about Creative Commons licences are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Any third- party material in this book is published under the book’s Creative Commons licence unless indicated otherwise in the credit line to the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Counters Male-Backlash Causal Evidence from India's
    Culture counters male-backlash Causal evidence from India’s Northeast Sumantra Pal Heidelberg University [email protected] Abstract The reverse causality between female employment and domestic violence is de- batable. Due to the adverse health consequences of domestic violence women shy away from employment. For fears about backlash from their husbands, wives may abstain from working. Battered women may also take up employment to liberate themselves from the grip of domestic violence. Using a new dataset that combines ethnographic data with the third wave of the National Family and Health Survey, I identify three instruments. Those are traditional tribal norms that are more con- ducive to the participation of women in activities outside of their homes, namely, female political engagement, female hunting, and female gathering of food, fodder and fuel. The instrument variable procedure generates significant protective effects for working wives with a 38 percent reduction in the probability of physical vi- olence, while controlling for observable social norms surrounding tribal marriage, separation, descent, inheritance, subsistence, and settlement patterns. JEL classification: B54, J12, Z13. Keywords: Female employment; Domestic violence; Social norms 1 Introduction Female employment is an intrinsic element in women’s empowerment and well-being. Increased female employment enhances women’s intra-household bargaining power and thereby reduces domestic violence against them. Therefore, promoting female employ- ment is a promising policy agenda for preventing and eliminating violence against women (United Nations 2013). Of late, feminist scholars have engaged in a debate about the am- biguous causal direction between female employment and domestic violence (Lenze and Klasen 2017; Klasen 2017; Caridad Bueno and Henderson 2017).
    [Show full text]