DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Development Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Development Plan ST LUCIA CAMPUS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN October 2018 [Draft F] - Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Purpose of the Site Development Plan (SDP) 2 1.2 Need for review of the Site Development Plan 3 1.3 Scope and limitations 3 1.4 Interpretation of the plan 3 1.5 Land to which this Site Development Plan relates 3 1.6 Relationship with other policies and legislation 4 1.7 Application of this Site Development Plan and approval pathways 6 1.8 Lifespan of existing campus buildings 8 2.0 DOCUMENT NAVIGATION 10 2.1 How to use this document 10 3.0 MASTER PLAN VISION AND PRINCIPLES 12 3.1 Master Plan vision 12 3.2 Key themes and principles 13 4.0 CAMPUS-WIDE STRATEGIES 14 4.1 Land use 16 Mix and integration of uses 19 Land use activation 19 Contents Retail strategy 19 4.2 Built form 20 Design excellence 24 Subtropical design 24 Gateway and landmark buildings 24 Building height and density 24 Active edges 24 Adaptation 25 Environmental performance 25 4.3 Public realm and landscape 26 Recreation and open space 30 Landscape markers and gateways 30 Collaboration plazas 30 ii St Lucia Site Development Plan - Sport and recreation 31 Status and updates Campus streetscapes 31 DOCUMENT Public artworks 31 REVISION Signage and wayfinding 31 AMENDMENTS Security and lighting 31 Draft A First Draft Views and vistas 31 Draft B Amendments 4.4 Access and movement 32 in line with Access and circulation 36 UQ-provided Active transport 36 comments Public transport 37 Car parking 37 Draft C Changes to plans 4.5 Heritage 38 and diagrams Indigenous and cultural heritage 40 Draft D Amendments Conservation of existing heritage buildings 40 in line with Adaptive re-use of buildings 41 UQ-provided 4.6 Environment and infrastructure 42 comments Sustainability 46 Draft E Amendments in Energy 46 line with OMC Stormwater management 46 comments Digital 46 Flooding 46 Draft F Appendices Sewer and water 46 updated Environment 47 5.0 PRECINCT SPECIFIC OUTCOMES 48 5.1 Identification of precincts 50 5.2 Precinct 1 Recreational Precinct 52 5.3 Precinct 2 West Precinct 58 5.4 Precinct 3 East Precinct 66 5.5 Precinct 4 South Precinct 72 5.6 Precinct 5 Core Precinct 78 5.7 Precinct 6 Student Living Precinct 84 6.0 MAKING IT HAPPEN 88 6.1 Implementation 89 6.2 Partnerships and engagement 89 7.0 APPENDICES 90 The University of Queensland 1 Table 1 Set Table # Figure 1 Set Figure # 1.0 Introduction For more than a century, The University of Queensland (UQ) has educated and worked with outstanding people to deliver unparalleled teaching, learning and research excellence that creates positive change globally. The University works to enhance its St Lucia campus as a highly connected hub that showcases Brisbane and Queensland to the world while providing learning, research and recreation, and is a fundamental part of the local community. This Site Development Plan explores current and possible future use of the St Lucia campus. It outlines development intent and guidelines aimed at achieving a strategic framework for development. 1.1 Purpose of the Site Development Plan (SDP) The Site Development Plan is designed to ensure the built and natural physical environment of the campus continues to meet the needs of the people who use it and engage with it. This plan includes assessment criteria that any new development on campus should seek to meet, and describes development outcomes that could occur. The SDP has been developed to reflect the St Lucia Campus Master Plan 2017, which sets out long-term vision, principles, strategies and design outcomes to guide growth and development. This SDP provides a delivery mechanism to ensure projects and developments achieve the vision and principles outlined by the Master Plan. 2 St Lucia Site Development Plan 1.0 Introduction 1.2 Need for review of the Site 1.3 Scope and limitations Development Plan This plan describes the development intent that The St Lucia campus is large and highly complex. directly reflects the University's vision and key All development on campus must carefully consider principles as identified in the Master Plan. The SDP and adapt to the ever-changing needs of students, is based on a 10 year life span, and will require re- a competitive education and research environment, evaluation as development occurs. and the evolving nature of the surrounding city. The 2006 SDP has been used as the guide for 1.4 Interpretation of the plan development for 12 years, and the campus has The terms used in this SDP have the meaning changed considerably in this time. assigned to them as identified in Appendix A: The development of the St Lucia Campus Master Glossary of Terms. It identifies key words and Plan in 2017, and the addendum to the 2015 version acronyms that appear frequently in this document. of the Master Plan, identified the need to update the SDP to more accurately reflect the current campus, 1.5 Land to which this Site and plans for the future. Development Plan relates The St Lucia campus is located within 5km of the Brisbane CBD, and is set on a stunning 114-hectare site alongside the Brisbane River. Although UQ has a number of key land holdings within the St Lucia peninsula, this SDP relates only to land within the existing Community Infrastructure Designation (CID), as identified inFigure 1.1. CID boundaries AVALON THEATRE ST LUCIA CAMPUS Figure 1.1: Land to which this SDP relates The University of Queensland 3 1.6 Relationship with other policies and legislation The Site Development Plan is just one element that informs campus planning and investment. The role of the SDP and its relationship to other key University policies is represented below. CORE A1 STRATEGIC PLAN 2018 - 2021 The key document in the University's cycle of planning and accountability. STRATEGIC B1 B2 B3 ABORIGINAL AND STUDENT STRATEGY ST LUCIA CAMPUS TORRES STRAIT 2016–2020 MASTER PLAN ISLANDER PLAN WHITE PAPER 2013–2017 UQ is committed to This strategy provides The Master Plan provides Indigenous education, and a series of goals and a future-focused strategic this plan sets out priorities initiatives that focus on framework and vision for Indigenous education transforming the student to guide growth and within the University. A experience on campus. development of the St Reconciliation Action Plan is Lucia campus and its being developed, and is due surrounding precincts. to be completed at the end of 2018. OPERATIONAL C1 C2 C3 SITE DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN (this document) PLAN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017–2020 The SDP provides an A plan that identifies key Forms part of the University's instrument for the delivery projects for the campus, strategic planning processes of development that seeks including programming, and establishes priorities for to achieve the vision and timing and delivery. the commitment of funds principles outlined in the for future capital projects, Master Plan. including new academic developments, rationalisation or relocation of existing activities, and provision for growth. Figure 1.2: Key University policies and legislation 4 St Lucia Site Development Plan A1 CORE B1 B2 B3 S TRATEGIC C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 OP L ERATIONA C4 C5 C6 C7 CAMPUS CAPITAL ST LUCIA CAMPUS UQ DESIGN RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PLACEMAKING STANDARDS STRATEGY 2018 PLAN 2018 - 2024 STRATEGY 2018 To ensure the variety and A new Capital Development A new guide for future UQ design standards and spread of retail across the Plan. landscape and placemaking technical guides. campus reflects both the works across the St Lucia demands and aspirations of campus. user groups. The University of Queensland 5 1.7 Application of this Site 1.7.1 Application Information Development Plan and Prior to the application and approval process, all approval pathways development proposals are considered by the University's Capital Management Group and assessed Figure 1.3 provides a summary of the planning against institutional infrastructure needs. pathways and process in which the SDP is to be used, and how an application for development will be An application through Pathway 2 is to be supported considered. by: • an assessment report considering the suitability of the proposal against this SDP There are two primary pathways available for • technical advice (where relevant), including development to be endorsed in accordance with this transport, civil, drainage and stormwater SDP. assessments • any other relevant technical assessment required Where it is determined that the to demonstrate suitability of the proposal. PATHWAY proposal would not: 1 - MINOR • establish an unplanned use on Plans and supporting information must detail the PROPOSAL the campus or within an existing following: building; • site location • dramatically change built form • building height on campus with respect to the scale, bulk and appearance of a • gross floor area building or other infrastructure; • interface with adjoining environment • significantly impact traffic • building design including elevations and materials flow or transport networks on • on-site parking and servicing arrangements campus; or • have a significantly impact on • open space / public realm concept the provision of infrastructure. A proposal not considered PATHWAY minor in nature requires full 2 - MAJOR consideration and assessment PROPOSAL through Steps 2 to 8 as identified byFigure 1.3. 6 St Lucia Site Development Plan ASSESSMENT PROCESS HOW TO APPLY THIS SDP PATHWAY Major or Proposals are assessed to determine whether they are minor or major. 1 - MINOR minor process If deemed minor, design review and approval is conducted by the UQ PROPOSAL determination Property and Facilities Division. Major projects are considered by the 1 Capital Management Group chaired by the Vice-Chancellor and are subject to steps 2-8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Question on Notice No. 531 Asked on Thursday 15 March 2007 MR BOMBOLAS Asked the Minister for Transport and Main Roads
    Question on Notice No. 531 Asked on Thursday 15 March 2007 MR BOMBOLAS asked the Minister for Transport and Main Roads (MR LUCAS)— QUESTION: Will he provide an update on the new direct bus service to the University of Queensland and its benefits, particularly for the constituents of the Chatsworth Electorate? ANSWER: I thank the Honourable Member for his question. The Eleanor Schonell Bridge, colloquially known as the Green Bridge, opened on 17 December 2006. To take advantage of the new bridge, the Queensland Government, through TransLink, introduced new bus services in Brisbane at a cost of approximately $4.1m per annum. These are routes 109 from the city, 169 from Eight Mile Plains and route 209 from Carindale. Route 109 was introduced on 18 December 2006, followed by routes 169 and 209 on 19 February 2007. These services are fully funded by the State Government and operated by Brisbane Transport. Route 109 runs from the city to The University of Queensland (UQ) Lakes Station via the Eleanor Schonell Bridge. This service runs every 8 – 10 minutes during university peaks and every 10 -15 minutes off-peak on weekdays and every 20 minutes on weekends. This equates to 767 trips each week. Passengers from the city save about three minutes travel time using route 109 across the new bridge, compared to existing services on Coronation Drive. Route 209 runs from the Carindale Interchange to UQ via the Eleanor Schonell Bridge. This service operates every 15 minutes on weekdays and 30 minutes on weekends all year round. This equates to 518 trips each week.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Mayor MEDIA RELEASE
    Adrian Schrinner Lord Mayor MEDIA RELEASE Community consultation kicks off for new bridges Brisbane is one step closer to five new bridges taking cars off the road and giving people a new way to travel, with Brisbane City Council now seeking community feedback on the transformational $550 million plan. Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner said he had a vision for a cleaner, greener and more active Brisbane and these new bridges would tackle traffic congestion by improving cross-river public and active transport connections. “These five bridges will transform Brisbane and make us an active, healthy and better connected city,” he said. “My very first act as Lord Mayor was to announce this plan and I am now handing the planning over the people of Brisbane as we want to hear the community’s thoughts on the proposed alignment of the bridges. “The community is crucial in the planning and delivery of these five bridges, as this infrastructure will transform the way residents and visitors get around Brisbane. “The business case for the first bridge, a pedestrian bridge connecting Kangaroo Point to the CBD, outlined that the bridge would result in 83,950 fewer car trips using river crossings each year. “With the preliminary business case for the Kangaroo Point Bridge now complete, it’s time to start planning for the other for cross-river connections. “Brisbane currently has more than 2.2 million residents and 1300 people move to our great city each month. “We know Brisbane is a great place to live, work and relax and these bridges are critical infrastructure to ensure as Brisbane grows, we remain a well-connected city.” Cr Schrinner said community consultation would run from November 11 to 6 December and would include a variety of ways for people to have their say, including 12 information sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bridge to St Lucia
    A Bridge to St Lucia Peter Brown St Lucia History Group Paper 20 ST LUCIA HISTORY GROUP ST LUCIA HISTORY GROUP RESEARCH PAPER 20. A BRIDGE TO ST LUCIA Author: Peter Brown © 2017 An abridged edition of this Paper was distributed under the same title as part of the celebrations for the opening of the Eleanor Schonell Bridge in December 2006. Contents: Page 1. 1880s Land Developer Proposals for a Bridge 1 2. 1926 The Cross-River Commission 6 3. 1925 University Proponents Anticipate a Bridge 6 4. 1940 Construction commences 10 5. 1950s A Growing Suburb Adds to the Need 14 6. 2006 The Eleanor Schonell Bridge. 15 7. University Orientation towards the Bridge. 17 Peter Brown 2017 Private Study Paper – not for general publication St Lucia History Group PO Box 4343 St Lucia South QLD 4067 Email: [email protected] Web: brisbanehistorywest.wordpress.com PGB/History/Papers/20Bridge Page 1 of 17 Printed 13 October 2017 ST LUCIA HISTORY GROUP 1. 1880s LAND DEVELOPER PROPOSALS FOR A BRIDGE From convict times through free settlement in 1842 and the first years of the development of Brisbane, row-boat ferries were the only means of crossing the river. Even today cross-river ferries play a leading role in getting residents across a wide and fast flowing river. The first bridge over any part of the Brisbane River was a (primarily) wooden one opened in 1865 to carry pedestrians and carts between South and North Brisbane, approximately where the Victoria Bridge is today.1 Made of Stringy Bark it survived termite attacks for only two years, and then it was back to the ferries.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Conduct on the Brisbane River
    Safe on water Code of conduct on the Brisbane River Image supplied by Tourism and Events Queensland 2 Content Content 2 4.8.1 Town Reach and South Brisbane Reach (between the Story Bridge and the Introduction 3 William Jolly Bridge) 16 4.8.2 Mowbray Park to Bretts Wharf 17 Application 3 5 Commercial vessels Definitions 4 and recreational power craft 19 1 General guidelines for 5.1 Docking and departing passive craft 5 pontoon procedures 19 5.1.1 Docking 19 2 General guidelines for 5.1.2 Departing pontoon 20 all commercial vessels and recreational 5.1.3 Exclusion zone markers power craft 6 deployed 20 3 Guidelines for 6 Incident reporting 21 the operation of passive craft 8 7 Endorsement of the 3.1 Guidelines for the operation code of conduct 22 of paddle sport craft 9 Annex A 23 4 Environmental considerations 10 4.1 Lighting 10 4.2 Restricted visibility 10 4.3 Noise 11 4.4 Tides 11 4.5 Hazards 12 4.6 River construction works 14 4.7 Bridges 16 4.8 Reaches of the Brisbane River 16 Brisbane River Code of Conduct, Transport and Main Roads, 2015 3 Introduction The safe operation of passive craft on Queensland’s waterways is a priority for state and local government authorities, commercial operators and sport and recreational organisations. This code of conduct has been created to provide guidance on several aspects of safe on-water conduct of passive craft including general rules of the river, interacting with other vessels, adapting to environmental factors, participant safety and incident reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Developing a Crash Prediction Model for Cyclists in Queensland
    CONTRACT ARRB Group Ltd www.arrb.com.au ACN 004 620 651 REPORT ABN 68 004 620 651 • Research and Consulting • Systems Feasibility of Developing a Crash Prediction Model for Cyclists in Queensland Project No: 006575 by Hanford Cheung for Department of Transport and Main Roads, Queensland Trusted advisor to road authorities for technical input and solutions June 2013 ARRB Group Ltd Feasibility of Developing a Crash ABN 68 004 620 651 Prediction Model for Cyclists in Victoria 500 Burwood Highway Queensland Vermont South VIC 3133 Australia P: +61 3 9881 1555 F: +61 3 9887 8104 [email protected] Western Australia 191 Carr Place Leederville WA 6007 Australia P: +61 8 9227 3000 F: +61 8 9227 3030 [email protected] New South Wales 2-14 Mountain St for Department of Transport and Main Roads, Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia Queensland P: +61 2 9282 4444 F: +61 2 9280 4430 [email protected] Queensland 123 Sandgate Road Albion QLD 4010 Australia P: +61 7 3260 3500 F: +61 7 3862 4699 [email protected] South Australia Level 5, City Central, Suite 507, 147 Pirie Street Reviewed Adelaide SA 5000 Australia P: +61 8 7200 2659 Project Leader F: +61 8 8223 7406 Hanford Cheung [email protected] International offices: Quality Manager Xiamen, People’s Republic of China Joseph Affum 006575 June 2013 June 2013 FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPING A CRASH PREDICTION MODEL FOR CYCLISTS IN QUEENSLAND Draft - Version Control ARRB Project No 006575 Client Project No Path j:\qld cycle strategy and development program\006575 vrup 2013-04 crash predication & risk assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Kurilpa Futures' Green Bridges Submission
    Kurilpa Futures Submission to BCC on Green Bridges - Toowong to West End and St Lucia to West End [email protected] Kurilpa Futures (KF) is pleased to provide a submission on the proposed Green Bridges to West End, noting that the deadline to provide feedback on these complex proposals was sensibly extended to 31 March. KF recognises that green bridges could be a valuable part of the overdue shift towards active transport, in an area of very rapid current and continuing population growth, and accepts that West End is an integral part of an active and inter-dependent inner city and wider metropolis. However, we continue to have many concerns about the consultation process and the bridge options as outlined below. Community consultation We remain concerned that the ‘push polling’ online survey on the Brisbane City Council website constrains participants to identify and support one of three preferred bridge options in the two locations, giving no opportunity to raise concerns and seek more information, nor to register a ‘no bridge’ position. Kurilpa Futures considers that untimely, rushed community engagement and unpublished incomplete information has already served to escalate confusion and division among residents. Council has also not allowed the community to consider and provide feedback on the costs and benefits of alternatives to bridges, such as a “lateral bridge” river walk/cycle way from West End to Dutton Park and the existing Eleanor Schonell Bridge, or improvement to ferry services and bus routes. Support for active transport infrastructure on the Kurilpa peninsula We are concerned that Council has decided to proceed with significant expenditure on these bridges without demonstrating how they will deliver other more affordable and effective active transport initiatives outlined in the South Brisbane Transport and Mobility Study (DTMR: 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Newstead Teneriffe Hawthorne Fortitude Valley Spring Hill
    76 Royal Childrens Hospital EXHIBITION 64 Red Hill VERNON TCE SKYRING TCE BULIMBA Fortitude Waterfront FERRY TERMINAL Park OXFORD ST TENERIFFE Valley FERRY TERMINAL Ithaca GREGORY TCE 61 Newstead MURRI WAY 63 Memorial Park BROOKES ST 67 Victoria Park 60 66 Golf Course 62 COMMERCIAL RD B JUBILEE TCE Spring R 56 U CONSTANCE ST McCaskie Hill N S Park W IC 68 Victoria K 65 Bardon KELVIN GROVE RD ST 57 Park FLORENCE ST M FORTITUDE 58 U S G VALLEY 69 R 55 AV 59 E MACQUARIE ST RD 51 Teneriffe WICKHAM ST ANN ST HARCOURT ST INNER CITY BYPASS 52 54 Victoria KENT ST Park 77 RIDING RD HAWTHORNE RD 50 LACHLAN ST TCE Chinatown c ORY M EG GIPPS ST 70 R ST PAULS TCE G JAMES ST 49 ROBERTSON ST Paddington BEESTON ST 48 BOUNDARY ST Centenary 78 71 Hardcastle St Andrews 47 Park War Memorial Place BRUNSWICK ST Hawthorne Hospital 53 75 HAWTHORNE 46 FERRY TERMINAL BOWEN TCE BOUNDARY RD Roma Street 45 Parkland BRIDGESTORY Cathedral 44 Square 79 74 CAXTON ST 41 Hawthorne Brisbane BROWNE ST Park Paddington Private 39 42 Hospital Captain 80 Suncorp 40 WHARF ST Stadium 43 Burke (Lang Park) Customs Park Rosalie HALE ST House 73 ROMA ST 38 CENTRAL 89 BRUNSWICK ST Norman 37 HOLMAN 81 Buchan 36 35 2 QUEEN ST STREET FERRY Park TERMINAL HOLMAN LAMINGTON ST Milton 33 ADELAIDE ST ST 34 Post Office Gregory WICKHAM ST RIVERSIDE Park ROMA ST Square CREEK ST Rainworth UPPER ROMA ST FERRY TERMINAL B WILLIAM JOLLY BRIDGE 3 O ANN ST Park 31 EAGLE ST 82 O 1 EDWARD ST 132 M 30 72 E MAKERSTON ST 10 R 11 A 32 Morningside N G QUEEN ST 4 83 MILTON RD S 134 T 12 133 29 King 13 MERTHYR
    [Show full text]
  • New Green Bridges for Brisbane – West End to Toowong & West End
    hbbvsadjshdbjhsbdv I think Brisbane City Council Brisbane City Council Bridges for Brisbane New GreenWest End to Bridges Toowong & West for End to St Lucia Pre-feasibility BrisbaneAssessment 265158-CIST-RPT-003 5 | 6 November 2019 West End to Toowong & West End to St Lucia Pre-feasibility Assessment This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 265158 Arup Pty Ltd ABN 18 000 966 165 Arup Level 4, 108 Wickham Street Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 GPO Box 685 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia www.arup.com Document verification Prepared for DOCUMENT INFORMATION Report Title New Green Bridges Job for title Brisbane – ToowongBridges for / BrisbaneSt Lucia / Job number Brisbane City Council, QLD West End Pre-feasibility Assessment 265158 266 George Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Report Number 265158-CIST-RPT Document-0003 title West End to Toowong & West End to St Lucia File reference GPO Box 1434, Brisbane Qld 4001 Filename 265158-CIST-RPT-0003.doc Pre-feasibility Assessment Date 06.11.2019 Document ref 265158 -CIST-RPT-003 Prepared by Revision Date Filename 265158 -CIST-RPT-0001.docx Draft 1 4 Feb Description First draft Arup REVISION DATE DETAILS2019 Arup Pty Limited Level 4, 108 Wickham Street 1.0 19.02.2019 Draft Issue to Client Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Australia 2.0 04.07.2019 Draft Issue to Client Alina Name Tom Brown Antony Schofield Tel: +61 7 3023 6000 Christophorou 3.0 27.09.2019 Draft Issue to Client 4.0 25.10.2019 Final Issue to SignatureClient This document may contain confidential and 4 24 Oct Filename 265158 -CIST-RPT-0003_v4.docx 5.0 06/11/2019 Final Issue to Client - Revised legally privileged information, neither of which are 2019 Description Final Issue intended to be waived, and must be used only for its intended purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleanor Schonell Bridge
    Value-mapping for major economic infrastructure projects by Judy Ann Kraatz B. Design Studies (Hons) University of Queensland B. Architecture (Hons) University of Queensland A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering School of Urban Development Queensland University of Technology August 2009 Table of Contents This page has been left blank. - ii - Table of Contents Abstract The establishment of corporate objectives regarding economic, environmental, social, and ethical responsibilities, to inform business practice, has been gaining credibility in the business sector since the early 1990’s. This is witnessed through (i) the formation of international forums for sustainable and accountable development, (ii) the emergence of standards, systems, and frameworks to provide common ground for regulatory and corporate dialogue, and (iii) the significant quantum of relevant popular and academic literature in a diverse range of disciplines. How then has this move towards greater corporate responsibility become evident in the provision of major urban infrastructure projects? The gap identified, in both academic literature and industry practice, is a structured and auditable link between corporate intent and project outcomes. Limited literature has been discovered which makes a link between corporate responsibility; project performance indicators (or critical success factors) and major infrastructure provision. This search revealed that a comprehensive mapping framework, from an organisation’s corporate objectives through to intended, anticipated and actual outcomes and impacts has not yet been developed for the delivery of such projects. The research problem thus explored is ‘the need to better identify, map and account for the outcomes, impacts and risks associated with economic, environmental, social and ethical outcomes and impacts which arise from major economic infrastructure projects, both now, and into the future’.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies on Transit Oriented Development Around Bus Rapid Transit Systems in North America and Australia
    Bus Rapid Transit and Transit Oriented Development: Case Studies on Transit Oriented Development Around Bus Rapid Transit Systems in North America and Australia April 2008 Breakthrough Technologies Institute 1100 H St N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Contents 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - 2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... - 5 - 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... - 9 - 3.1 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................. - 9 - 3.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... - 9 - 3.3 Literature Review .................................................................................................................................. - 10 - 4 Brisbane, Australia ......................................................................................................................................... - 12 - 4.1 Land Use Planning in Southeast Queensland ........................................................................................ - 15 - 4.2 South
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Brisbane © State of Queensland, June 2017
    Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Connecting Brisbane © State of Queensland, June 2017. Published by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, 1 William Street, Brisbane Qld 4000, Australia. Licence: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Australia Licence. In essence, you are free to copy and distribute this material in any format, as long as you attribute the work to the State Of Queensland (Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning) and indicate if any changes have been made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Attribution: The State of Queensland, Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning on 13 QGOV (13 74 68). Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the St Lucia Campus Master Plan (PDF, 15
    ST LUCIA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN December 2017 ii A message from the Vice- Chancellor and President For more than a century, The University of Queensland has educated and worked with outstanding people to deliver teaching, learning and research excellence that creates positive change globally. In an ever-changing economic and social environment with considerable population growth, we must be flexible and adapt so we can continue to support the evolving needs of our students, industry collaborators and community partners, and maintain and improve the high standards we have set. Developing and executing plans for how students, staff and the community will access and use our campuses in the future will play a central role in meeting the challenges and opportunities ahead. This St Lucia Campus Master Plan has been carefully developed through extensive expert, stakeholder and community consultation. It provides a future-focused strategic framework for development at the St Lucia campus and its surrounding precincts, which will be guided by intrinsic heritage, landscape and cultural values. UQ aspires to enhance the role of the St Lucia campus as a highly connected hub that is a fundamental part of the local community, and promote Brisbane and Queensland to the world as a desired destination for learning, research and recreation. We welcome your input to the Master Plan and encourage your feedback and participation. Professor Peter Høj Vice-Chancellor and President iii This Master Plan document fits into a broader suite of documents. Each of the four documents below provides detailed information to assist in the future development of the St Lucia campus.
    [Show full text]