DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of the County of St. Paul, Alberta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of the County of St. Paul, Alberta Soi1 Survey of the County of St. Paul, Alberta J.A. Brierley, L.D. Andriashek and W.L. Nikiforuk Alberta Soi1 Survey Report No. 52 1993 - - - - - - - - - - - CENTRE OF LAND AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION NO. 93-82 -_ PRINCIPALCOOPERATIVE AGENCIES: AGRICULTURE CANADA, CLBRR - ALBERTA RESEARCH COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING - - ‘- -- ii - - How to use this soi1 survey report - The soil survey report for the County of St. Paul consists Experience has shown that the following step by step of three chapters, five appendices and four 150 000 scale procedure assists users of the report: (lcm = 1/2km) planimetric base soi1 maps. A legend, 1. Locate the specific area on the appropiate map specific to each map sheet, describes the components of sheet. each soi1 map unit symbol. l an index to the four map sheets is on page 3 (a small The three chapters contain the following information: scale, index map is included on each map sheet) - Chapter 1 provides a general overview of the survey area l generally using the section, township and range grid, in terms of climatic, ecological and geologic charac- identii soi1 map delineation and the associated map teristics. symbol for the specific area. Chapter 2 provides a general description of the soi1 types 2. Expianation of map symbol. and associated landforms by subdividing the County into l find the map symbol and accompanying description of sixteen land systems. Each land system is described indi- associciated soi1 and landscape characteristics within vidually. the soi1 map unit legend, alphabetically and numerically Chapter 3 documents the methodology and assumptions arranged - used to rate the soi1 map units for arable agriculture and l soi1 map unit descriptions in the legend are described in - range productivity. Generalized maps illustrating the areal terms of the intregral components. - extent of these interpretive class ratings are included. 3. Detailed description of the individual soi1 map - units. The five appendices include: - A. A brief explanation of soi1 forming processes and soi1 l refer to Appendix C for the description of the soi1 map classification, as well as a description of the mapping units procedures, field and office activities. l refer to Appendix B for description of soi1 series, (the B. Documentation of the analytical methods used for ana- building blocks of soi1 map units) lyzing soi1 samples. Descriptions of the major soi1 se- l soi1 map units and soi1 series are listed alphabetically, by - ries, in terms of physical and chemical characteristics. symbol. - C. Detailed descriptions of the soi1 units and associated 4. Interpretations. - soi1 map units. l each soi1 map unit is interpreted for specified land use D. A table listing the specific interpretive ratings for each practices in Appendix D soi1 map unit. l a brief explanation describing the rationale and method- E. A glossary of terms used in this report. ology used to determine these ratings is given in Chap- - ter 3. - - - . - III - Preface Soi1 surveys have been an ongoing endeavour in Alberta Sand River Area (73L) (Kocaoglu 1975). Soil information since the 1920’s. Their purpose is to provide basic infor- was not available for a seven mile wide strip across the mation on the provincial soi1 resources. Most of the settled County and east to the Alberta-Saskatchewan border. This portions of Alberta are covered by reconnaissance soil project (which included the Soil Survey of the County of St. surveys. Many areas require resurvey and updating to Paul as well as the Frog Lake Indian Reserve and Fishing current standards, particularly the areas covered by earlier Lake Metis Settlement) rectified this defiency of the provin- surveys. cial soi1 data base. The previously existing available soil information for the In 1987 the County of St. Paul soil survey project was - County of St. Paul was variable. Majority of the area was initiated. The survey information complies with semi-de- included on the Soil Survey of the Wainwright and Vermil- tailed level (Soi1 Intensity Leve13) specifications (E.C.S.S. lion Sheets (Wyatt et al. 1944) and the Soil Survey of the 1987a). Field work for this project was completed in 1989. Acknowledgements The soil survey of the County of St. Paul was a project l L.W. Turchenek provided advice and assistance in map- conducted by Alberta Soi1 Survey. The Alberta Soil Survey ping and describing the organic soil landscapes within is a cooperative research body which includes repre- the County. sentatives of Agriculture Canada, Center of Land and l J. Lutz and M. Huemmert digitized the maps. J. Lutz Biological Resources Research and Alberta Research compiled, checked and plotted the final digitized maps, Council (ARC), Environmental Research and Engineering as well as producing the generalized interpretation Depattment. Additional funding for the project was pro- maps of the Cour@. vided by Alberta Agriculture. l J. Beres, W.C. McKean and A. Schwarzer conducted the - The following people and organizations are recognized physical and chemical analysis on the collected soil for providing assistance, support and cooperation during samples. the course of the survey: l L. Bradley and J. Matthie, Drafting and Publications, l Field mapping - L.D. Andriasheks, J.A. Brierleyl, ARC for cartographie production of maps. - W.L.Nikiforuks, C.M. Richterl and I.R. Whitsonlgs. l G.M. Coen, J.A. Shields and R.W. Howitt provided the l Field assistants - J. Burke, J. Christiansen, R. Delorme, scientific review of the manuscript. ,- K. King, T. Messier, B. Munroe, R.Penny, and S. l Landowners throughout the study area allowed access Prauner. to their land and offered friendly advice. l Soil correlation - G.M. Coen and J.A. Shields. 1. Agriculture Canada 2. Alberta Research Council iv Y - - Summary - The County of St. Paul is situated in east-central Alberta, ings of soils (grassland soils, forest soils and wet soils) - approximately 300 kilometers northeast of Edmonton. The characterize the environmental features of this portion of County is approximately 354 200 hectares in size. Agricul- physiographic region. The dominant surficial material is till. Fluvial and lacus- ture is the principal land use. Roughly 40% of the County -’ is trop land and 35% is used for forage production and trine materials occur sporadically throughout the area. grazing. Activities related to energy exploration and pro- These surficial materials overlie shale and sandstone bed- duction are other major land use practices impacting on rock of the Lea Park and Belly River Formations. - the land resource within the County. Sixteen landscapes with similar geographic, geologic The County is within the Eastern Alberta Plain physiog- and surface features are recognized within the County. - raphic region. The geographic and geologic charac- These landscape segments are called land systems. Land teristics of this region are varied. The contintental climate systems, described in terms of climate, soil, and land- associated with east-central Alberta is divided into three forms, provide a suitable basis for conservation and land agroclimatic zones. Two distinct vegetation zones (Aspen use planning decisions, at the municipal scale. Parkland and Boreal Mixedwood) and three large group- - - - - - V - Contents How to use this soi1 survey report ................................................................ ii Preface .................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................... iii Summary .................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. General description of area. ........................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................. ..l 1.2 Location and geographical features ................................................. 1 1.3 Climate ..................................................................... ..l 1.3.1 Agroclimatic zones .......................................................... 2 1.4 Vegetation .................................................................. ...4 1.5 Bedrockgeology ............................................................... 1.6 Surficialgeology ............................................................. ...7 1.6.1 Preglacial bedrock topography ................................................ 7 1.6.2 Glacial landforms and materials. ............................................... 8 1.6.3 Complex glacial landform models. .............................................. 9 Chapter 2. Land Systems within the County of St. Paul. ............................................. 12 2.1 Introduction...................................................................l 2 2.2 Description of Land Systems ..................................................... 13 2.2.1 AlmaPlain...............................................................l 3 2.2.2 BunderUpland............................................................l 4 2.2.3 DoloUpland..............................................................l 4 2.2.4 GadoisPlain ............................................................. 15 2.25 Kehiwin Plain. ............................................................ 15 - 2.2.6 MannLakeUpland ........................................................ 16 2.2.7 Muriel Upland ............................................................ 16 2.2.8 Northern Valley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RURAL ECONOMY Ciecnmiiuationofsiishiaig Activity Uthern All
    RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All W Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I I Project Report 92-01 PROJECT REPORT Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, D. Watson and T. Peters Project Report 92-01 The authors are Associate Professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Forest Economist, Forestry Canada, Edmonton; Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton and Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta Interim Project Report INTROI)UCTION Recreational fishing is one of the most important recreational activities in Alberta. The report on Sports Fishing in Alberta, 1985, states that over 340,000 angling licences were purchased in the province and the total population of anglers exceeded 430,000. Approximately 5.4 million angler days were spent in Alberta and over $130 million was spent on fishing related activities. Clearly, sportsfishing is an important recreational activity and the fishery resource is the source of significant social benefits. A National Angler Survey is conducted every five years. However, the results of this survey are broad and aggregate in nature insofar that they do not address issues about specific sites. It is the purpose of this study to examine in detail the characteristics of anglers, and angling site choices, in the Southern region of Alberta. Fish and Wildlife agencies have collected considerable amounts of bio-physical information on fish habitat, water quality, biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Package Watercourse
    Information Package Watercourse Crossing Management Directive June 2019 Disclaimer The information contained in this information package is provided for general information only and is in no way legal advice. It is not a substitute for knowing the AER requirements contained in the applicable legislation, including directives and manuals and how they apply in your particular situation. You should consider obtaining independent legal and other professional advice to properly understand your options and obligations. Despite the care taken in preparing this information package, the AER makes no warranty, expressed or implied, and does not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. For the most up-to-date versions of the documents contained in the appendices, use the links provided throughout this document. Printed versions are uncontrolled. Revision History Name Date Changes Made Jody Foster enter a date. Finalized document. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. Alberta Energy Regulator | Information Package 1 Alberta Energy Regulator Content Watercourse Crossing Remediation Directive ......................................................................................... 4 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 4 How the Program Works .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vessel Operation Restriction Regulations Règlement Sur Les Restrictions Visant L’Utilisation Des Bâtiments
    CANADA CONSOLIDATION CODIFICATION Vessel Operation Restriction Règlement sur les restrictions Regulations visant l’utilisation des bâtiments SOR/2008-120 DORS/2008-120 Current to June 20, 2019 À jour au 20 juin 2019 Last amended on October 10, 2018 Dernière modification le 10 octobre 2018 Published by the Minister of Justice at the following address: Publié par le ministre de la Justice à l’adresse suivante : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca OFFICIAL STATUS CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL OF CONSOLIDATIONS DES CODIFICATIONS Subsections 31(1) and (3) of the Legislation Revision and Les paragraphes 31(1) et (3) de la Loi sur la révision et la Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1er juin follows: 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidence Codifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated 31 (1) Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regula- support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette tion and of its contents and every copy purporting to be pub- loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu. Tout exemplaire lished by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi the contrary is shown. publié, sauf preuve contraire.
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Plains Ecozone Evidence for Key Findings
    Boreal Plains Ecozone+ evidence for key findings summary Canadian Biodiversity: Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010 Evidence for Key Findings Summary Report No. 12 Published by the Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Boreal Plains Ecozone+ evidence for key findings summary. Issued also in French under title: Sommaire des éléments probants relativement aux constatations clés pour l’écozone+des plaines boréales. Electronic monograph in PDF format. ISBN 978‐1‐100‐24960‐5 Cat. no.: En14‐43/0‐12‐2014E‐PDF Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non‐commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1‐800‐668‐6767 (in Canada only) or 819‐997‐2800 or email to [email protected]. Cover photos: Aerial image of boreal plain, © Lorna Allen; Black spruce forest, © Lorna Allen This report should be cited as: ESTR Secretariat. 2014. Boreal Plains Ecozone+ evidence for key findings summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Grebe Surveys in Alberta 2016
    WESTERN GREBE SURVEYS IN ALBERTA 2016 The western grebe has been listed as a Threatened species in Alberta. A recent data compilation shows that there are approximately 250 lakes that have supported western grebes in Alberta. However, information for most lakes is poor and outdate d. Total counts on lakes are rare, breeding status is uncertain, and the location and extent of breeding habitat (emergent vegetation, usually bulrush) is usually unknown. We are seeking your help in gathering more information on western grebe populations in Alberta. If you visit any of the lakes listed below, or know anyone that does, we would appreciate as much detail as you can collect on the presence of western grebes and their habitat. Let us know in advance (if possible) if you are planning on going to any lakes, and when you do, e-mail details of your observations to [email protected]. SURVEY METHODS: Visit a lake between 1 May and 31 August with spotting scope or good binoculars. Surveys can be done from a boat, or vantage point(s) from shore. Report names of surveyors, dates, number of adults seen, and report on the approximate percentage of the lake area that this number represents. Record presence of young birds or nesting colonies, and provide any additional information on presence/location of likely breeding habitat, specific parts of the lake observed, observed threats to birds or habitat (boat traffic, shoreline clearing, pollution, etc.). Please report on findings even if no birds were seen. Lakes on the following page that are flagged with an asterisk (*) were not visited in 2015, and are priority for survey in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency in Fisheries Management
    Fish Habitat Restoration in Muriel Lake September 2018 Prepared by: Ray Makowecki MSc., BSc., BEd., P.Biol. 1 1975 2 3 PURPOSE • Muriel Lake Restoration • Do we have a Problem • Specific Fish and Fish Habitat Facts • Fish Habitat and Management Solutions 4 5 Muriel Lake 6800 ha at fsl 1981 - 559.1m Geodetic Elevation 1993 - 557.8m Geodetic Elevation 2013 - 555.7m Geodetic Elevation 2018 - 555.8m Geodetic Elevation 6 Muriel Lake 7m depth 2018 7 Lake Level 40 Year Trend of Declining Water Level • Current level • 555.8m 2018 FACTS & OBSERVATIONS What is the Problem? • Many older anglers indicate fishing was very good in the 1960’s, 1970’s and 1980’s when some whitefish, pike, perch and walleye would be caught and used. • Since 2000 little consumptive use 10 FACTS & OBSERVATIONS What is the Problem? •For over 20 years, several lakes in the area have had zero limits or very restrictive catch and keep limits. •Many lakes have due to low water levels been unable to support fish including Muriel. 11 FACTS & OBSERVATIONS What is the Problem? • Alberta’s commercial fishery was closed in 2014. Muriel Lake closed in 1996 • Anglers and fish consumers are not satisfied with prohibited consumptive use of Alberta’s publicly owned fish resources. 12 Annual Production - Muriel • Walleye 5848 kg/year (0.86 kg/ha) • Northern Pike 15,368 kg/year (2.26 kg/ha) • Yellow Perch 15,368 kg/year (2.26 kg/ha) • Lake Whitefish 29,920 (4.4 kg/ha) 13 Historic Harvest, Stocking and Regulations Muriel Lake Years Type of WALL NRPK YLPR LKWH Comments Fishery Commerc <20kg <1332 <10 <40,554 kg ial 1967-1976 Commerc Closed <223kg <1930 0 <25,890 ial 1996 1988-1996 Recreatio Catch 3 10 15 10 n limits Pre 1998 Recreatio Catch 0 0 0 0 n limits14 1998-2017 15 16 17 18 19 Muriel Lake 2012 • Government FWIN Testing 11 nets • Longnose Suckers (3) and Cyprinids (126) • No pike, whitefish, perch, burbot or walleye • Need some information here 20 Muriel Lake • Annual production for pike, lake whitefish and perch has not been harvested for the past 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Western Grebe (Aechmophorus Occidentalis) in Alberta
    Status of the Western Grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis) in Alberta Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 60 Status of the Western Grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis) in Alberta Prepared for: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (SRD) Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) Prepared by: Jill Yanch This report has been reviewed, revised, and edited prior to publication. It is an SRD/ACA working document that will be revised and updated periodically. Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 60 June 2006 Published By: i Publication No. T/107 ISBN: 0-7785-4548-2 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-4549-0 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1206-4912 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1499-4682 (On-line Edition) Series Editors: Sue Peters, Robin Gutsell, Nyree Sharp and Lisa Matthias Illustrations: Brian Huffman Maps: Nicole Hopkins For copies of this report, visit our web site at: http://www.srd.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/ and click on “Detailed Status” OR Contact: Information Centre - Publications Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 - 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 This publication may be cited as: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Conservation Association. 2006. Status of the western grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Status Report No. 60, Edmonton, AB. 29 pp. ii PREFACE Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development revews the general status of wldlfe speces n Alberta. These overvews, whch have been conducted n 1991 (The Status of Alberta Wildlife), 1996 (The Status of Alberta Wildlife) and 2000 (The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2000), assgn ndvdual speces “ranks” that reflect the perceived level of risk to populations that occur in the province.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Report
    The Second Report Watershed Stewardship Grant Program (Spring 2006, Fall 2006, Spring 2007) AENV Grant: #06GREA29 Sarah Hipkin & Kevin Wirtanen Grant Administrators 2006-2008 Alberta Stewardship Network Special thanks to: Alberta Environment Members of the Stewardship Grant Committee: Margaret Glasford, ASN Chair / Past Chair and Grant Committee Chair (all grant cycles) Petra Rowell, Alberta Environment (all) Jeff McCammon, Lac La Nonne Watershed and Lake Stewardship Society (all) Shirley Pickering, Highwood Water Management Plan Public Advisory Committee (all) Ernie Ewaschuk and Sarah Primeau, Land Stewardship Centre of Canada & ASN Secretariat Ken Lewis and Dale Chrapko, Alberta Agriculture and Food /AESA Diana Rung, Alberta Conservation Association (all) Kelsey Spicer-Rawe, Alberta Riparian Habitat Management Society (Cows & Fish) (all) Wendy Devent, Stephanie Palechek and Leda Kozak, Oldman Watershed Council Kent Lyle, Sylvan Lake Watershed Stewardship Society (Spring 2006) Frank Vagi, North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance (Fall 2006) Jacqueline Nelson, ASN Chair (2007/8 on) and Foothills Land Trust (Spring 2008) Jodi Miller, Volunteer Steward (Spring 2008) Additional appreciation is extended to the ASN’s other partnering organizations. The delivery of the range of ASN services is dependent on their ongoing support. 2 CONTENTS The Ripple Reaches Further: The Second Report on the Watershed Stewardship Grant Program ..............................................................................6 Highlights Reach .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacteria Commonly Form Blooms on the Surface of Productive, Warm, Stable Lakes and Reservoirs
    Alberta Environment Cyanotoxin Program Status Report Alberta Environment Cyanotoxin Program Status Report Prepared by: Ron Zurawell, Ph.D., P.Biol. Limnologist/Water Quality Specialist Water Policy Branch Environmental Assurance Division Alberta Environment August 2010 W1001 ISBN: 978-0-7785-9013-2 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 978-0-7785-9014-9 (On-Line Edition) Web Site: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/home.asp Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment 7th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: (780) 427-6278 Fax: (780) 422-6712 Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Information Centre Alberta Environment Main Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: (780) 427-2700 Fax: (780) 422-4086 Email: [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alberta’s nutrient-rich lakes and reservoirs often experience blooms of cyanobacteria (a.k.a. blue-green algae) during summer and early fall. Common species of cyanobacteria can produce potent liver and/or nerve toxins. Microcystins (MCYSTs) are thought to be the most common toxins produced by cyanobacteria and exert toxicity by severely damaging liver structure and function. They have been linked to high incidence of primary liver (hepatocellular carcinoma) and colorectal cancers in some countries. Cyanotoxin monitoring was incorporated into Alberta’s Integrated Lake and Reservoir Monitoring Program in 2005 with the goal of determining the prevalence of MCYST in Alberta. In addition, we investigate the occurrence of multiple MCYST analogues, a potent neurotoxin anatoxin-a (ATX-a), and a potentially toxic amino acid, β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) recently reported to be produced by cyanobacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Innisfree Audit Planning Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
    Village of Innisfree Regular Council Meeting Innisfree Council Chambers, Innisfree AB December 17, 2019 @ 5:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Agenda a. Deletions/Additions b. Adoption of Agenda 3. Delegations 4. Adoption of Minutes a. November 19, 2019 Regular Council Minutes (Page 3-6) 5. Business Arising from the Minutes 6. Policies & Bylaws a. 645/19 – Amendment to Tax Rate Bylaw 637/19 (Page 7) 7. New Business a. 2020 Travel Lakeland Activity Guide (Page 8-14) b. 106.5 Country Christmas Advertising Packages (Page 15-16) c. ATB Financial – Loan Renewal Agreement (Page 17-19) d. Tax Forgiveness – Plan 4175R, Block 8, Lot 14 (Page 20-22) e. Alberta Municipal Affairs Letter December 4, 2019 – Municipal Accountability Program Review 2020 (Page 23-24) f. Federation of Canadian Municipalities Membership 2020-2021 (Page 25-26) g. Trans Canada Yellowhead Highway Association – Municipal Membership (Page 27-29) h. Notice of Hearing – Alberta Utilities Commission – Transmission Line 7L65 Rebuild Project (Page 30-33) i. Northern Lights Library System – 2020 Levy (Page 34) j. Metrix Group LLP - Engagement Letter & Audit Planning Report (Page 35-62) 8. Councillor Reports a. MMI FCSS Report – Deborah McMann (Page 63) b. Innisfree School Council Meeting – Deborah McMann (Page 64) 9. Administration Reports a. CAO Report & Action List (Page 65-68) b. Financials i. Tax Trial Balance – November 30, 2019 (Page 69) ii. Utility Trial Balance – November 30, 2019 (Page 70) iii. Accounts Payable – Cheque Listing – November, 2019 (Page 71-72) iv. Revenue & Expenses – November, 2019 (Page 73-78) c. Website Report (Page 79-80) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Charted Lakes List
    LAKE LIST United States and Canada Bull Shoals, Marion (AR), HD Powell, Coconino (AZ), HD Gull, Mono Baxter (AR), Taney (MO), Garfield (UT), Kane (UT), San H. V. Eastman, Madera Ozark (MO) Juan (UT) Harry L. Englebright, Yuba, Chanute, Sharp Saguaro, Maricopa HD Nevada Chicot, Chicot HD Soldier Annex, Coconino Havasu, Mohave (AZ), La Paz HD UNITED STATES Coronado, Saline St. Clair, Pinal (AZ), San Bernardino (CA) Cortez, Garland Sunrise, Apache Hell Hole Reservoir, Placer Cox Creek, Grant Theodore Roosevelt, Gila HD Henshaw, San Diego HD ALABAMA Crown, Izard Topock Marsh, Mohave Hensley, Madera Dardanelle, Pope HD Upper Mary, Coconino Huntington, Fresno De Gray, Clark HD Icehouse Reservior, El Dorado Bankhead, Tuscaloosa HD Indian Creek Reservoir, Barbour County, Barbour De Queen, Sevier CALIFORNIA Alpine Big Creek, Mobile HD DeSoto, Garland Diamond, Izard Indian Valley Reservoir, Lake Catoma, Cullman Isabella, Kern HD Cedar Creek, Franklin Erling, Lafayette Almaden Reservoir, Santa Jackson Meadows Reservoir, Clay County, Clay Fayetteville, Washington Clara Sierra, Nevada Demopolis, Marengo HD Gillham, Howard Almanor, Plumas HD Jenkinson, El Dorado Gantt, Covington HD Greers Ferry, Cleburne HD Amador, Amador HD Greeson, Pike HD Jennings, San Diego Guntersville, Marshall HD Antelope, Plumas Hamilton, Garland HD Kaweah, Tulare HD H. Neely Henry, Calhoun, St. HD Arrowhead, Crow Wing HD Lake of the Pines, Nevada Clair, Etowah Hinkle, Scott Barrett, San Diego Lewiston, Trinity Holt Reservoir, Tuscaloosa HD Maumelle, Pulaski HD Bear Reservoir,
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs Techmemo
    450 - 1 Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1 Tel: (403) 920-2940 Fax: (403) 920-2347 E-mail: [email protected] September 28, 2020 Filed Electronically Canada Energy Regulator Suite 210, 517 Tenth Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2R 0A8 Attention: Mr. Jean-Denis Charlebois, Secretary of the Commission Dear Mr. Charlebois: Re: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL) 2018 Meter Stations and Laterals Abandonment Program (2018 Abandonment Program) MHW-003-2019, Order ZO-008-2019 and Amending Order AO-001-ZO-008-2019 (Order, as amended) Project Update: Saddle Lake West Lateral Abandonment File No.: OF-Fac-Gas-N081-2018-16 01 On December 20, 2019, the Canada Energy Regulator (CER or Commission) issued the Order, as amended, approving the 2018 Abandonment Program.1 NGTL writes to update the CER of a change in abandonment method for the Saddle Lake West Lateral, which was previously contemplated as part of the 2018 Abandonment Program application approved by the CER. Abandonment Method – Saddle Lake West Lateral In its application, NGTL proposed to abandon a 13.54 km section of the Saddle Lake West Lateral (SLW Lateral) located on and within Saddle Lake Cree Indian Reserve No. 125 (SLC IR No. 125) entirely by removal,2 and noted that while the lateral crosses two watercourses, being the Saddle Lake Creek and an unnamed tributary to the North Saskatchewan River (Watercourses), no in-stream or riparian work would be required.3 NGTL further advised it was working with Saddle Lake Cree Nation (SLCN) to conduct on-site field surveys to better understand site conditions for the SLW Lateral’s removal.4 NGTL has since conducted on-site field surveys in October 2018 and July 2020 with SLCN.
    [Show full text]