Balancing Progress and Managing Expectations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Balancing Progress and Managing Expectations S. HRG. 114–764 U.S.-INDIA RELATIONS: BALANCING PROGRESS AND MANAGING EXPECTATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 24, 2016 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–984 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida BARBARA BOXER, California RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JEFF FLAKE, Arizona JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire CORY GARDNER, Colorado CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware DAVID PERDUE, Georgia TOM UDALL, New Mexico JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut RAND PAUL, Kentucky TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER CONTENTS Page Corker, Hon. Bob, U.S. Senator From Tennessee ................................................. 1 Cardin, Hon. Benjamin L., U.S. Senator From Maryland ................................... 2 Biswall, Hon. Nisha Desai, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC .............................. 4 Dhume, Sadanand, Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute, Wash- ington, DC ............................................................................................................. 29 Ayres, Alyssa, Senior Fellow for India, Pakistan, and South Asia, Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC .............................................................. 30 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD Witnesses’ Prepared Statements: Nisha Desai Biswall ......................................................................................... 41 Sadanand Dhume ............................................................................................. 46 Alyssa Ayers ...................................................................................................... 51 Additional Questions Submitted by Members of the Committee: Responses to Additional Questions for the Record Submitted to Assistant Secretary of State Nisha Biswal by Senator David Perdue ...................... 57 Responses to Additional Questions for the Record Submitted to Assistant Secretary of State Nisha Biswal by Senator Christopher Coons .............. 64 Responses to Additional Questions for the Record Submitted to Assistant Secretary of State Nisha Biswal by Senator Edward J Markey ............... 66 (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER U.S.-INDIA RELATIONS: BALANCING PROGRESS AND MANAGING EXPECTATIONS TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2016 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:03 a.m. in Room SD–419, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Bob Corker, chair- man of the committee, presiding. Present: Senators Corker [presiding], Rubio, Johnson, Gardner, Perdue, Cardin, Menendez, Shaheen, Coons, Murphy, Kaine, and Markey. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. BOB CORKER, U.S. SENATOR FROM TENNESSEE The CHAIRMAN. The Foreign Relations Committee will come to order. We welcome everybody. The nature and scope of the U.S.-India relationship has changed significantly over the past couple of decades. Indeed, political, eco- nomic, and strategic cooperation between the United States and India is at an all-time high. There is considerable potential to further strengthen many as- pects of our relationship. For example, I am encouraged by efforts to expand U.S.-India defense and security cooperation specifically in the maritime sphere. As the world’s two largest democracies, it is essential that Washington and Delhi stand together to uphold democratic values, principles, and norms in the Indo-Pacific, par- ticularly as China seeks to gain greater influence in the region. India’s positive engagement and support for peace and stability in Afghanistan is also another reason for optimism. Unquestionably India has much to contribute to the international efforts to tackle complex global challenges. And there is little doubt that the overall trajectory of the U.S.- India relations is positive, and we talked a little bit about that be- fore the meeting. And again, we thank you for being here to testify. But there remain a number of challenges as well, including our economic and trade relationship. Onerous and unreasonable local- ization requirements, high tariffs, limits on foreign investment, and unparalleled bureaucratic red tape hinder further access to the In- dian market by American businesses. There are also serious concerns about the treatment of intellec- tual property in India. Prime Minister Modi has made repeated statements about undertaking economic reforms and making India (1) VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER 2 more hospitable for foreign investors. And there have been some small movements in certain sectors such as defense. However, the rhetoric has far outpaced the reforms. Moreover, it appears that trade and investment remain principally transactional for the Indians rather than serving as indispensable tools to estab- lishing a genuinely free market economy. I am concerned that the robust rhetoric has created a widening expectations gap between Washington and Delhi. Of course, we must aspire as a government to achieve certain goals in any relationship, especially with India. But in the case of U.S.-India relations, the hopeful rhetoric has far exceeded actual, tangible achievements. I can think of no more poignant example than the U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation agreement. Nearly 8 years have passed since the nuclear cooperation agreement was signed, and only in recent weeks have we been assured that contracts for U.S. companies are imminent. Of course, we need to see what those contracts actually look like as well. For these reasons, U.S.-India relations would be better served by a more sober and pragmatic approach that could go a long way to- wards laying the groundwork for genuine progress in areas that would be mutually beneficial to both the United States and India. I look forward to hearing the witness, and I want to thank you for being here. I look forward to our distinguished ranking member and his opening comments. And thank you for being here. STATEMENT OF HON. BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, U.S. SENATOR FROM MARYLAND Senator CARDIN. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I welcome both panels of our witnesses today. And thank you for calling this hearing. It could not be more timely with Prime Minister Modi’s visit scheduled early next month. It is important that this committee have this hearing to look at the deepening ties between India and the United States. It has been a relationship that has only grown stronger in recent years. We look at the 2-year anniversary of the Modi administra- tion, which has, I think, deepened the ties between the United States and India. And as you pointed out, the United States and India are the two largest democracies in the world. So there is an expectation that that relationship would get stronger and it has. Today I hope we will have a chance to explore our defense rela- tionship. Clearly we have a lot in common. The South China Sea and China’s activities on maritime security dictate that the United States and India work a closer defense cooperative arrangement to make sure that we maintain the commerce of the seas and the openness of the shipping lanes. We also need to deal with counterterrorism. We still recall the tragic terrorist episode in Mumbai in 2008. Three of my constitu- ents from Maryland were killed during that attack, and that is still fresh in the minds of the people of India. So I think strengthening our ties on counterterrorism, working towards further cooperation in South Asia is an important part of the growing relationship be- tween our two countries. VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:15 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\MOVED TO RUN\28-984.TXT MIKE FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER 3 You mentioned the nuclear agreements on civil nuclear coopera- tion. India, of course, which has nuclear power and also nuclear weapons, is a country that we need to make sure that we have a close tie on the nuclear front, on nuclear safety, and nuclear pro- liferation. So I would be interested in hearing from our witness the status of the agreements between
Recommended publications
  • What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's U.S. Visit
    What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit By Caroline Wadhams and Aarthi Gunasekaran September 25, 2013 Despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East, the Obama administration continues its steady pursuit of a foreign policy makeover, reorienting its attention and resources to the Asia-Pacific—specifically India. Following a number of high-level visits by American officials to India, including Vice President Joe Biden’s trip in July and Secretary of State John Kerry’s trip in June, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will meet with President Barack Obama tomorrow during his second official trip to Washington as prime minister.1 During the meeting, President Obama and Prime Minister Singh will likely focus on the following six issues in the U.S.-India relationship: • Trade and investment • Defense cooperation • The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal • Climate change and clean energy • Immigration reform • Security issues and the strategic partnership 1 Center for American Progress | What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit For the Obama administration, underlying these discussions will be the unmet expecta- tions of the U.S.-India relationship, a relationship envisioned as the cornerstone of the U.S. rebalance to the Asia-Pacific. While there were high hopes following the U.S.-India civil nuclear deal in 2008 and Prime Minister Singh’s 2009 visit to Washington, many U.S. policymakers have been disappointed by the Indian government’s failure to deepen the partnership by implementing the civil nuclear deal, making India more open to investment opportunities for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • US Claims of Illegal Russian Nuclear Testing
    Policy White Paper Analysis of Weapons-Related Security Threats and Effective Policy Responses U.S. Claims of Illegal Russian Nuclear Testing: Myths, Realities, and Next Steps By Daryl G. Kimball August 16, 2019 Executive Director, Arms Control Association n prepared remarks delivered at the Hudson Institute May 29, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Lt. Gen. Robert Ashley, Jr., charged that “Russia probably is not adhering to its nuclear testing Imoratorium in a manner consistent with the ‘zero-yield’ standard outlined in the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).” Russia has vigorously denied the allegation. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called the accusation “a crude provocation” and pointed to the United States’ failure to ratify the CTBT. On June 12, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said, “we are acting in full and absolute accordance with the treaty ratified by Moscow and in full accordance with our unilateral moratorium on nuclear tests.” The DIA director’s remarks, and a subsequent June 13 statement on the subject, are quite clearly part of an effort by Trump administration hardliners to suggest that Russia is conducting nuclear tests to improve its arsenal, and that the United States must be free of any constraints on its own nuclear weapons development effort, and, indirectly, to try to undermine the CTBT itself—a treaty the Trump administration has already said it will not ratify. The challenges posed by the new U.S. allegations are significant and they demand a proactive plan of action by “friends of the CTBT” governments for a number of reasons. HIGHLIGHTS • Any violation of the CTBT by Russia, which has signed • The Treaty’s Article I prohibition on “any nuclear weapons and ratified the agreement, or any other signatory, would test explosion, or any other nuclear explosion” bans all be a serious matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Stuff Below. Thanks Again for Helping with the Meeting This Morning
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794102 Date: 12/31/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 From: Mills, Cheryl D <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 6:17 PM To: Subject: FW: President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts FYI From: Brett McGurk Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:48 PM To: Mills, Cheryl D Subject: FW: President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts Good stuff below. Thanks again for helping with the meeting this morning. Bill followed up with me and we had a good talk. Brett ■ THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 10, 2012 President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts WASHINGTON, DC - Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts: • Robert Stephen Beecroft - Ambassador to the Republic of Iraq, Department of State • T. Charles Cooper - Assistant Administrator for Legislative and Public Affairs, United States Agency for International Development • Rose Gottemoeller - Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, Department of State President Obama said, "I am proud to nominate such impressive individuals to these important roles, and I am grateful they have agreed to lend their considerable talents to this Administration. I look forward to working with them in the months and years ahead." UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794102 Date: 12/31/2015 UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794102 Date: 12/31/2015 President ObaMa announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts: Ambassador Robert Stephen Beecroft, Nominee for Ambassador to the Republic of Iraq, Department of State Ambassador Robert Stephen Beecroft, a career member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, has served at the United States Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq as Deputy Chief of Mission since July 2011 and as Chargé d'Affaires since June 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing Diplomacy: Asian American and Pacific Islander Diplomats
    Facing Diplomacy: United States Asian American and Pacific Islander Diplomats Sources Stories and resources centered around the unique experiences, challenges, and achievements of diverse American diplomats. *This resource will be periodically updated* Amemiya Kikuchi, Yuriko (Principal Dancer, Martha Graham Company) Primary Sources ● Charles KiKuchi Papers, University of California Secondary Sources ● Briones, Matthew M. Jim and Jap Crow: A Cultural History of 1940s Interracial America. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2012. Media Sources ● Image, UC Berkeley, Bancro Library ● Martha Graham in Performance ● Online Computer Library Center: Yuriko Additional Online Resources ● Hayakawa, Mana. 2018. “Dancing Alien, Enemy, and Ally: Yuriko Amemiya’s Negotiations of Race, Gender, and Citizenship.” PhD. diss. University of California, Los Angeles ● McGehee, Helen. Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 11, no. 1 (1993): 99-103. Arvizu, Alexander A. Overseas Diplomatic Service ● U.S. Ambassador to Albania (2010-2015) ● Deputy Chief of Mission ○ Thailand (2004-2007) ○ Cambodia (2000-2003) 1 Deputy Assistant Policy for East Asia and Pacific ○ Korea and Japan (2007-2009) Primary Sources ● Ambassador Arvizu Article “Time to End Modern Slavery in Albania”, 2014 ● ThePolitic.org interview Media Resources ● Ambassador Alexander A. Arvizu Additional Online Resources ● State Department Archives ● Foreign Service Journal, May 2018 ● U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian Bloch, Chang, Julia, First U.S. Ambassador of Asian American Pacific Islander Descent Overseas Diplomatic Service ● U.S. Ambassador to Nepal (1989-1993) Primary Sources ● Julia Chang Bloch’s “Whole of Mission Approach in Nepal” ● Oral history 1993, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training ● Dept. of State 2016, Interview with first Asian American Ambassador Secondary Sources ● “Julia Chang Bloch: Breaking Barriers, Building Bridges,” China Daily, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • USSYP 2010 Yearbook.Pdf
    THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS DIRECTORS William Randolph Hearst III UNTED STATE PESIDENTR James M. Asher Anissa B. Balson David J. Barrett S Frank A. Bennack, Jr. SE NAT E YO John G. Conomikes Ronald J. Doerfler George R. Hearst, Jr. John R. Hearst, Jr. U Harvey L. Lipton T Gilbert C. Maurer H PROGR A M Mark F. Miller Virginia H. Randt Paul “Dino” Dinovitz EXCUTIE V E DIRECTOR F ORT Rayne B. Guilford POAR GR M DI RECTOR Y - U N ITED S TATES SE NATE YOUTH PROGR A M E IGHT H A N N U A L WA S H INGTON WEEK 2010 sponsored BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM FUNDED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK H M ARCH 6 – 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET · SUITE 1212 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504 WWW.USSENATEYOUTH.ORG Photography by Jakub Mosur Secondary Photography by Erin Lubin Design by Catalone Design Co. “ERE TH IS A DEBT OF SERV ICE DUE FROM EV ERY M A N TO HIS COUNTRY, PROPORTIONED TO THE BOUNTIES W HICH NATUR E A ND FORTUNE H AV E ME ASURED TO HIM.” —TA H O M S J E F F E R S ON 2010 UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGR A M SENATE A DVISORY COMMITTEE HONOR ARY CO-CH AIRS SENATOR V ICE PRESIDENT SENATOR HARRY REID JOSEPH R. BIDEN MITCH McCONNELL Majority Leader President of the Senate Republican Leader CO-CH AIRS SENATOR SENATOR ROBERT P.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-Us Strategic Partnership Implications for Pakistan
    INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by ASHFAQ AHMED MAILK SCHOOL OF POLITICS AND INTERNTIONAL RELATIONS QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD SEPTEMBER 2018 i APPROVAL The PhD thesis titled “INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN” has been carried out by Ashfaq Ahmed Malik, under my supervision. The work is approved for evaluation by the foreign referees. Dr. Nazir Hussain Professor/Supervisor ii DECLARATION The PhD thesis “INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN” is based on the original research. No part of the thesis is copied or plagiarized; all sources are properly documented as per the guidance provided by the QAU/HEC. Ashfaq Ahmed Malik iii DEDICATION To my mother who is my everything iv CONTENTS ABSTRACT vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii ABBREVIATIONS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 15 1.1 A Balance of Power Approach 1.2 Statist/Unitary Actor Approach 1.3 Sovereignty 1.4 National interest 1.5 Rational Choice 1.6 Hegemonic Stability and Consolidation 1.7 Theoretical Construct 1.8 Application of Theoretical Construct CHAPTER 2: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS 37 2.1 Evolution of Indio-US Strategic Partnership 2.2 Post Independence: 1960-1974 2.3 1974 till End of Cold War Era 2.4 Post Cold War Era 2.5 Nuclear Explosions by India and Pakistan 2.6 Bush Transformation Era 2.7 India-US Defense Deal 2.8 India-US Defense Trade 2.9 Other Areas of Interests between
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Rose Gottemoeller NEW START TREATY – ANOTHER
    Interview Rose Gottemoeller NEW START TREATY – ANOTHER SUCCESS STORY The New START treaty undoubtedly opens a new page in the relations between the United States and Russia. Its significance for strengthening the arms limitation regime is hard to overestimate. How did the ratification of the new treaty go? What are the main challenges to its successful implementation? What steps are being considered with respect to future arms control? We have put these questions to the Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance of U.S. Department of State and Head of the U.S. delegation at the New START talks Rose Gottemoeller. SECURITY INDEX: The ratification process of the New START Treaty was slow and contentious. How would you explain this level of interest? GOTTEMOELLER: The hearings and debate on the U.S. Senate floor over the Treaty were intense because Senators were interested in the issue and the outcome of the ratification effort. Once the President submitted the Treaty to the Senate, Senators gave careful consideration to the Treaty, through 18 hearings, scores of briefings, and over 1,000 questions that the Administration answered for the official record of the Treaty debate. This level of interest was not unexpected. The issue of nuclear disarmament is critical to the national security of the United States and a major nuclear arms reduction treaty had not been considered by the U.S. Senate in many years. The President appreciated the show of bipartisan support for the New START Treaty. This demonstration of bipartisanship underscored that Democrats and Republicans can work together on national security issues.
    [Show full text]
  • AMCHAM India Sectoral Committees 2017-18 Keeping the Members’ Interest Foremost, the Committees Focus on the Following
    AMCHAM 1 AMCHAM 2 AMCHAM indexIndex 1. Chairman’s Message 02 2. Director General CEO’s Report 04 3. National Executive Board 2017 - 18 07 4. Sectoral Committees 2017 - 18 10 5. Membership 2017 - 18 12 6. Analysis of Events Organized by AMCHAM during 2017 - 18 13 7. New Members 2017 - 18 14 8. Highlights of the Year 2017 - 18 16 AMCHAM Chairman’s Message The world economy has been showing signs of growth notwithstanding the rising trade protectionism and financial market volatility. The Indian economy, on the other hand, continues to be one of the fastest growing. In the last 3 to 4 years, the Indian government has unveiled a string of reforms including two big bang reforms like the GST and demonetization which allowed the Indian economy to move into a cashless economy. Early this year, the Indian government raised FDI caps in several sectors and eased FDI rules for single brand retail (allowing 100% FDI in single brand under automatic route), non - banking financial companies and construction. These measures will enable India to increase its share in the global FDI inflow. Foreign investors have responded positively by bringing new investments or expanding their existing investments and remain optimistic of India’s growth story. Thus, 2018 will be a year of consolidation and it is predicted that the economy will grow by more than 7%. The U.S. - India strategic partnership continues to grow. This relationship has seen many pluses in the recent past. • Bilateral trade has more than doubled since 2006 and is estimated to reach $ 140 billion in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • India–US Relations in the Age of Uncertainty: an Uneasy Courtship
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 19:57 02 December 2016 India–US Relations in the Age of Uncertainty In the initial phase of the Obama administration, India’s ruling class and strategic community formed a perception that the spirit of strategic partnership between the two countries might be diluted on account of China looming large in the priorities of this administration. Despite occasional hiccups in their relationship, this perception was overshadowed by the administration’s recognition of India’s role as counterweight to China in the Asia-Pacific region. This book addresses and re-evaluates the perceptions, policies and perspectives of public policy makers and bureaucratic elites in both India and the US in setting and articulating the tone, tenor and substance of the multi-faceted ties between the two countries. The scope of the book is not exclusively limited to the bilateral relationship in the critical areas such as the Indo-US nuclear deal, defence, security, and strategic partnership. Its concerns and ramifications are much wider in global and regional contexts, covering security architecture in the Asia-Pacific region, the interface between terrorism and weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), China as a factor in India-US relations, and the fallout of the New Delhi-Washington partnership on South Asia. B.M. Jain is a former Senior Fellow at the Indian Council of Social Sciences Research (ICSSR, New Delhi) in India, and was Visiting Professor in the Departments of Political Science at both Cleveland State University and Binghamton University, USA. Previously he was Professor of Political Science at the University of Rajasthan at Jaipur, India, and Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Journal of Asian Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Megacity Security Conference Speaker and Participant Bios
    Megacity Security Conference Monday, November 22, 2015 – Tuesday, November 23, 2015 Speaker and Participant Bios Mumbai, India Gov. John M. Hunstman, Jr. Former Governor of Utah; Former Ambassador to China; Chairman, Atlantic Council Governor Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. is Chairman of the Atlantic Council Board of Directors. He began his career in public service as a Staff Assistant to President Ronald Reagan. He has served each of the four US presidents since then in critical roles around the world, including as Ambassador to Singapore, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Asia, US Trade Ambassador, and most recently, US Ambassador to China. In all three Senate confirmations, he received unanimous votes. Twice elected Governor of Utah, Governor Huntsman brought about strong economic reforms, tripled the state's rainy day fund, and helped bring unemployment rates to historic lows. During his tenure, Utah was named the best managed state in America. Recognized by others for his service, Governor Huntsman was elected as Chairman of the Western Governors Association, serving nineteen states throughout the region. He currently serves on the boards of Ford Motor Company, Caterpillar Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Huntsman Corporation, the US Naval Academy Foundation, and the University of Pennsylvania. In addition, he serves as a Distinguished Fellow at the Brookings Institute, a Trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Trustee of the Reagan Presidential Foundation, and Chairman of the Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Governor Huntsman has served as a Visiting Fellow at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government as well as a Distinguished Lecturer at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Gottemoeller Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Term of Appointment: 03/07/2014 to Present
    Rose Gottemoeller Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Term of Appointment: 03/07/2014 to present Rose E. Gottemoeller was sworn in as the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security (T) on March 7, 2014. As Under Secretary, Gottemoeller advises the Secretary on arms control, nonproliferation and disarmament. She had served as Acting in this position since February 7, 2012. While Acting, Gottemoeller continued to serve as Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance, a position she was appointed to on April 6, 2009. She was the chief U.S. negotiator of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) with the Russian Federation, which entered into force on February 5, 2011. Prior to the Department of State, in 2000, she became a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where she also served as the Director of the Carnegie Moscow Center (January 2006 – December 2008). In 1998-2000, as Deputy Undersecretary of Energy for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation and before that, Assistant Secretary and Director for Nonproliferation and National Security, she was responsible for all nonproliferation cooperation with Russia and the Newly Independent States. Prior to her work at the Department of Energy, Ms. Gottemoeller served for 3 years as Deputy Director of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. From 1993 to 1994, she served on the National Security Council staff as Director for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia Affairs, with responsibility for denuclearization in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus. Previously, she was a social scientist at RAND and a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, May 2020
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION MAY 2020 NUCLEAR DIPLOMACY TODAY THE DIPLOMAT AND THE STATE TEX HARRIS, LARGER THAN LIFE –ADVERTISEMENT– FOREIGN SERVICE May 2020 Volume 97, No. 4 Focus on Nuclear Diplomacy BRIAN HUBBLE BRIAN 26 33 37 U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Why Nuclear Arms Restoring Nuclear Control Negotiations— Control Matters Diplomacy A Short History Today Urgent action is needed to put the lid An accomplished negotiator puts nuclear In this time of new strains on a new and costly global arms race. arms control in perspective—what it has in great-power relations, By Joseph Cirincione achieved, where it nuclear arms control has failed and what it can do for agreements are an essential 41 our future security. component of national security. From the FSJ Archive By Rose Gottemoeller By Thomas Countryman Arms Control Diplomacy FS Heritage Appreciation 50 F. Allen “Tex” Harris 1938-2020 The Unlucky Consul: Thomas Prentis and the 1902 Martinique 67 Disaster Larger Than Life In 1902, the worst volcanic Feature By Steven Alan Honley disaster of the 20th century took the lives of U.S. Consul Thomas Prentis and his family 44 70 on a Caribbean island. The Foreign Service Remembrances By William Bent Honor Roll U.S. diplomats are on the front lines of America’s engagement with the world. Here is the history of AFSA’s work to pay tribute to the many who sacrificed their lives in the line of duty. By John K. Naland THE FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL | MAY 2020 5 FOREIGN SERVICE Perspectives Departments 10 Letters 7 88 12 Letters-Plus President’s Views Reflections Foreign Service Duty Y2K, What Y2K? 16 Talking Points By Eric Rubin By Lian von Wantoch 77 In Memory 9 81 Books Letter from the Editor Nuclear Diplomacy Matters By Shawn Dorman 22 Marketplace Speaking Out The Diplomat and the State 83 Real Estate By Christopher W.
    [Show full text]