Plant Diversity II: Seed Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

5/21/2014 Plant Diversity II: Seed Plants Angiosperms and Gymnosperms Pesticides! Include: Herbicides Insecticides Fungicides Rodenticides 1 5/21/2014 Pesticides are pervasive Studies of major rivers and streams document that 96% of all fish, 100% of all surface water samples 33% of major aquifers contain one or more pesticides at detectable levels Surface water= In a large sampling of streams throughout the country, USGS found 46 pesticides and pesticide degradation products in one or more samples Groundwater= A 1989 study found residues of 39 pesticides and their degradation products in the groundwater of 34 states and Canadian provinces Dozens of pesticides and their degradation products contaminate waterways and escape regulatory oversight 2 5/21/2014 Runoff from urban lawn pesticides contaminates local watersheds and stresses municipal water treatment. Pesticides harm humans Human health effects, Kettles, MA, SR, Browning, TS Prince, and SW Horstman. 1997. Triazine herbicide exposure and breast cancer including low birth weights, incidence: An ecologic study of Kentucky counties. Environmental Health Perspectives 105(11):1222-1227. breast cancer, and low sperm counts are linked to herbicide- contaminated water Children are not adequately protected by federal limits of pesticides in water. USGS found that more that 90% of water and fish samples from all streams sampled in the U.S. contain at least one pesticide USGS. 1999. The Quality of Our Nations Water: Nutrients and Pesticides. USGS Circular 1225. [http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/waterusgsgov/water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1225/] 3 5/21/2014 Pesticides harm wildlife Frogs exhibit hermaphrodism when exposed to legally allowable levels of the herbicide atrazine in waterways A study of sex hormones in carp indicates that pesticides may be affecting the ratio of estrogen to testosterone in both male and female fish. They have also caused fish kills. Goodbred, S.L., Gilliom, R.J., Gross, T.S., Denslow, N.P., Bryant, W.L., and Schoeb, T.R., 1997, Reconnaissance of 17b-estradiol, 11- ketotestosterone, vitellogenin, and gonad histopathology in common carp of United States streams—potential for contaminant-induced endocrine disruption. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-627. 1. Which of the following is NOT a plant adaptation for life on land? a) Roots, which stabilize and absorb water and nutrients from soil b) A waxy cuticle, which prevents water loss c) Colonial living, which maximizes use of resources while expending less energy d) Stomata, which allow for gas exchange 4 5/21/2014 1. Which of the following is NOT a plant adaptation for life on land? A. Roots, which stabilize and absorb water and nutrients from soil B. A waxy cuticle, which prevents water loss C. Colonial living, which maximizes use of resources while expending less energy D. Stomata, which allow for gas exchange 2. Why is water needed for bryophyte reproduction? A. Both the sperm and the egg develop in spores, which must swim through water to undergo fertilization. B. The sperm must swim to the egg. C. Without water, the sperm will fertilize the egg, but the embryo will not develop. D. Without water, the embryo will remain haploid instead of diploid. 5 5/21/2014 2. Why is water needed for bryophyte reproduction? A. Both the sperm and the egg develop in spores, which must swim through water to undergo fertilization. B. The sperm must swim to the egg. C. Without water, the sperm will fertilize the egg, but the embryo will not develop. D. Without water, the embryo will remain haploid instead of diploid. 3. What is one of the main differences between club moss and moss? A. Club moss has vascular tissue. B. Moss has leaves; club moss does not. C. To conduct water and nutrients, club moss has rhizoids rather than vessels. D. Moss has sperm and egg within the same spore; club moss has them in different spores. 6 5/21/2014 3. What is one of the main differences between club moss and moss? A. Club moss has vascular tissue. B. Moss has leaves; club moss does not. C. To conduct water and nutrients, club moss has rhizoids rather than vessels. D. Moss has sperm and egg within the same spore; club moss has them in different spores. What’s special about seeds? Seeds allow the embryo to go dormant for a long period of hard conditions: cold or dry winters Allows a wider range of dispersion Seed coat Endosperm =Stored food 7 5/21/2014 Alternating Generations In more advanced plants, the sporophyte generation is dominant. Alternation of generations modified Pollen= Male gametophyte Contains sperm Ovule= Female gametophyte Contains egg 8 5/21/2014 How is pollen an adaptation? Allows fertilization to occur even in the absence of available water. water Moss fertilization Pollen grains Gymnosperms:“naked seed” Coniferophyta (pines and cone bearing trees) Cycads (palmlike) Ginkgos (ginkgo trees) Gnetophyta (gnetums) 9 5/21/2014 Gymnosperms: Ginkgo Long thought to be extinct in western civilization, until travelers from Germany found it while visiting temples in China and Japan. Fleshy outer covering to seed–looks like a fruit Gymnosperms: Cycadophyta Cycads Palm-like plants, but have cones for reproduction Tropical Endangered by poaching and a 23% of 305 extant black market species endangered, 15% vulnerable 10 5/21/2014 Gymnosperms: Gnetophyta Ephedra Welwitchsia Gnetum Temperate regions Namibia Old and New except Australia World Tropics • Flower-like structures 11 5/21/2014 Gnetophyta: Welwitchsia Ephedra spp.= Mormon tea 12 5/21/2014 Mormon tea Canyonlands NP, UT 13 5/21/2014 Gymnosperms: Coniferophyta Key characteristics: Needle-like or scale like leaves Thick cuticle Recessed stomata Resin Cones Life Cycle of the Pine scale of a male cone MEIOTIC CELL DIVISION IN ovule MALE SCALE spore-forming 1 Male cone 2 Pollen cell male cone scales give rise to is liberated pollen; each female and carried 3 Pollen lands cone scale contains by the wind on the scale of a two ovules female cone and a pollen tube MEIOTIC CELL mature begins to grow scale of a DIVISION IN sporophyte female cone FEMALE SCALE female cone female gametophyte 7 The seed 4 As the pollen tube grows, germinates and the meiotic cell division in the ovule embryo develops into leads to development of the a sporophyte tree female gametophyte seedlings eggs pollen 6 The fertilized egg 5 When the pollen tube tube develops into an embryo, reaches an egg within which is encased in a seed the female gametophyte, a sperm nucleus moves through the tube and seed fertilization occurs embryo FERTILIZATION sperm haploid (n) nucleus diploid (2n) Fig. 21-11 14 5/21/2014 Angiosperm specific adaptations Unlike other plants they have: Flowers Double fertilization Fruit What are the advantages of flowering? Discuss this question in groups 15 5/21/2014 Angiosperms: the Flowering plants Why do plants have flowers? Enlists partnerships with insects and other animals Less inbreeding Higher probability the pollen will reach the right plant They don’t have to produce as much pollen Double fertilization 1. Two pollen nuclei enter ovule 2. One fuses with the egg to form the zygote 3. The other fuses with 2 central cell nuclei to become the endosperm (3n), food for the zygote 16 5/21/2014 Fruit development anther Becomes the seed! Becomes the fruit! Flower ---> Fruit Progression Apple 17 5/21/2014 Fruit: Form and Function Dispersal Mechanisms Wind Animals Acorn Maple seed Fleshy fruit Milkweed Trends through Time Ancestral Derived Activity: Arrange the taxa below along the time continuum, include shared, derived traits and examples for each Gymnosperms Bryophytes Lycophytes Angiosperms Pterophytes 18 5/21/2014 Trends through Time Ancestral Derived Seeds & Vascular Non-vascular Seedless vascular No Fruit Fruit Bryophytes Lycophytes Pterophytes Gymnosperms Angiosperms True mosses Club mosses: Whisk ferns Conifers Monocotyledons Liverworts Selaginella Horsetails Ginkophyta (monocots) Hornworts Lycopodium True Ferns Cycads Dicotyledons Gnetophyta (dicots) Trends through Time Ancestral Derived Seeds & Vascular Non-vascular Seedless vascular No Fruit Fruit Bryophytes Lycophytes Pterophytes Gymnosperms Angiosperms Gametophyte Sporophyte Sporophyte Sporophyte Sporophyte dominant dominant dominant dominant dominant Sperm - water Sperm - water Sperm - water Sperm-no water Sperm-no water Pores Vascular Vascular Vascular tissue: Vascular tissue Waxy cuticle tissue tissue xylem-tracheids xylem-tracheids Stomata Stomata Stomata phloem-seive Stems Stems Woody stems tube members Leaves Leaves Seeds & Pollen Seeds & Pollen Roots Roots Waxy cuticle Flowers & Fruits Strobilus Sori Double fertilization Waxy cuticle Waxy cuticle Waxy cuticle Stomata 19 .
Recommended publications
  • Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life

    Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life

    Plant Evolution An Introduction to the History of Life KARL J. NIKLAS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction 1 1 Origins and Early Events 29 2 The Invasion of Land and Air 93 3 Population Genetics, Adaptation, and Evolution 153 4 Development and Evolution 217 5 Speciation and Microevolution 271 6 Macroevolution 325 7 The Evolution of Multicellularity 377 8 Biophysics and Evolution 431 9 Ecology and Evolution 483 Glossary 537 Index 547 v Introduction The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is. It’s how nature creates itself, on every scale, the snowflake and the snowstorm. — TOM STOPPARD, Arcadia, Act 1, Scene 4 (1993) Much has been written about evolution from the perspective of the history and biology of animals, but significantly less has been writ- ten about the evolutionary biology of plants. Zoocentricism in the biological literature is understandable to some extent because we are after all animals and not plants and because our self- interest is not entirely egotistical, since no biologist can deny the fact that animals have played significant and important roles as the actors on the stage of evolution come and go. The nearly romantic fascination with di- nosaurs and what caused their extinction is understandable, even though we should be equally fascinated with the monarchs of the Carboniferous, the tree lycopods and calamites, and with what caused their extinction (fig. 0.1). Yet, it must be understood that plants are as fascinating as animals, and that they are just as important to the study of biology in general and to understanding evolutionary theory in particular.
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World

    Number of Living Species in Australia and the World

    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
  • The Supramolecular Organization of Self-Assembling Chlorosomal Bacteriochlorophyll C, D,Ore Mimics

    The Supramolecular Organization of Self-Assembling Chlorosomal Bacteriochlorophyll C, D,Ore Mimics

    The supramolecular organization of self-assembling chlorosomal bacteriochlorophyll c, d,ore mimics Tobias Jochum*†, Chilla Malla Reddy†‡, Andreas Eichho¨ fer‡, Gernot Buth*, Je¸drzej Szmytkowski§¶, Heinz Kalt§¶, David Moss*, and Teodor Silviu Balaban‡¶ʈ *Institute for Synchrotron Radiation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Postfach 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany; ‡Institute for Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Postfach 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany; §Institute of Applied Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Universita¨t Karlsruhe (TH), D-76131 Karslruhe, Germany; and ¶Center for Functional Nanostructures, Universita¨t Karlsruhe (TH), D-76131 Karslruhe, Germany Edited by James R. Norris, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and accepted by the Editorial Board July 18, 2008 (received for review March 22, 2008) Bacteriochlorophylls (BChls) c, d, and e are the main light-harvesting direct structural evidence from x-ray single crystal structures, the pigments of green photosynthetic bacteria that self-assemble into exact nature of BChl superstructures remain elusive and these nanostructures within the chlorosomes forming the most efficient have been controversially discussed in the literature (1–3, 7, antennas of photosynthetic organisms. All previous models of the 11–17). It is now generally accepted that the main feature of chlorosomal antennae, which are quite controversially discussed chlorosomes is the self-assembly of BChls and that these pig- because no single crystals could be grown so far from these or- ments are not bound by a rigid protein matrix as is the case of ganelles, involve a strong hydrogen-bonding interaction between the other, well characterized light-harvesting systems (1). Small- 31 hydroxyl group and the 131 carbonyl group.
  • Chlorophyta Is a Division of Green Algae, Informally Called

    Chlorophyta Is a Division of Green Algae, Informally Called

    Chlorophyta is a division of green algae, informally waters of the Sargasso Sea. Many brown algae, such as called chlorophytes. The name is used in two very members of the order Fucales, commonly grow along different senses so that care is needed to determine the rocky seashores. Some members of the class are used as use by a particular author. In older classification food for humans. systems, it refers to a highly paraphyletic group of all Worldwide there are about 1500–2000 species of brown the green algae within the green plants (Viridiplantae), algae.[4] Some species are of sufficient commercial and thus includes about 7,000 species [4] [5] of mostly importance, such as Ascophyllum nodosum , that they aquatic photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms. Like the have become subjects of extensive research in their own land plants (bryophytes and tracheophytes), green algae right.[5] [4] contain chlorophylls a and b, and store food as starch Brown algae belong to a very large group, the in their plastids. Heterokontophyta, a eukaryotic group of organisms In newer classifications, it refers to one of the two distinguished most prominently by having chloroplasts clades making up the Viridiplantae, which are the surrounded by four membranes, suggesting an origin chlorophytes and the streptophytes or charophytes.[6][7] from a symbiotic relationship between a basal In this sense it includes only about 4,300 species.[3] eukaryote and another eukaryotic organism. Most brown algae contain the pigment fucoxanthin, which is responsible for the distinctive greenish-brown color that The red algae, or Rhodophyta ( / r o ʊ ˈ d ɒ f ɨ t ə / or / gives them their name.
  • Cycad Forensics: Tracing the Origin of Poached Cycads Using Stable Isotopes, Trace Element Concentrations and Radiocarbon Dating Techniques

    Cycad Forensics: Tracing the Origin of Poached Cycads Using Stable Isotopes, Trace Element Concentrations and Radiocarbon Dating Techniques

    Cycad forensics: Tracing the origin of poached cycads using stable isotopes, trace element concentrations and radiocarbon dating techniques by Kirsten Retief Supervisors: Dr Adam West (UCT) and Ms Michele Pfab (SANBI) Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Conservation Biology 5 June 2013 Percy FitzPatrick Institution of African Ornithology, UniversityDepartment of Biologicalof Cape Sciences Town University of Cape Town, Rondebosch Cape Town South Africa 7701 i The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Plagiarism declaration iv Abstract v Chapter 1: Status of cycads and background to developing a forensic technique 1 1. Why are cycads threatened? 2 2. Importance of cycads 4 3. Current conservation strategies 5 4. Stable isotopes in forensic science 7 5. Trace element concentrations 15 6. Principles for using isotopes as a tracer 15 7. Radiocarbon dating 16 8. Cycad life history, anatomy and age of tissues 18 9. Recapitulation 22 Chapter 2: Applying stable isotope and radiocarbon dating techniques to cycads 23 1. Introduction 24 2. Methods 26 2.1 Sampling selection and sites 26 2.2 Sampling techniques 30 2.3 Processing samples 35 2.4 Cellulose extraction 37 2.5 Oxygen and sulphur stable isotopes 37 2.6 CarbonUniversity and nitrogen stable of isotopes Cape Town 38 2.7 Strontium, lead and elemental concentration analysis 39 2.8 Radiocarbon dating 41 2.9 Data analysis 42 3.
  • Part IX – Appendices

    Part IX – Appendices

    Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary – Proposed Action Plans Part IX – Appendices Monterey Bay Sanctuary Advisory Council Membership List of Acronyms 445 Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary – Proposed Action Plans Appendix 1 – Sanctuary Advisory Council Membership Non-Governmental Members ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agriculture (Primary & SAC Vice Chair) Mr. Richard Nutter [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agriculture (Alternate) Mr. Kirk Schmidt Quail Mountain Herbs 831-722-8456 [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Business/Industry (Primary) Mr. Dave Ebert, Ph.D. Project Manager, Pacific Shark Research Center 831-771-4427 [email protected] or [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Business/Industry (Alternate) Mr. Tony Warman 831-462-4059 [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conservation (Primary) Ms. Vicki Nichols Director of Research & Policy Save Our Shores 831-462-5660 [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conservation (Alternate) Ms. Kaitilin Gaffney Central Coast Program Director The Ocean Conservancy 831-425-1363 [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Diving (Primary) Mr. Frank Degnan CSUMB [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Seedless Plants Key Concept Seedless Plants Do Not Produce Seeds 2 but Are Well Adapted for Reproduction and Survival

    Seedless Plants Key Concept Seedless Plants Do Not Produce Seeds 2 but Are Well Adapted for Reproduction and Survival

    Seedless Plants Key Concept Seedless plants do not produce seeds 2 but are well adapted for reproduction and survival. What You Will Learn When you think of plants, you probably think of plants, • Nonvascular plants do not have such as trees and flowers, that make seeds. But two groups of specialized vascular tissues. plants don’t make seeds. The two groups of seedless plants are • Seedless vascular plants have specialized vascular tissues. nonvascular plants and seedless vascular plants. • Seedless plants reproduce sexually and asexually, but they need water Nonvascular Plants to reproduce. Mosses, liverworts, and hornworts do not have vascular • Seedless plants have two stages tissue to transport water and nutrients. Each cell of the plant in their life cycle. must get water from the environment or from a nearby cell. So, Why It Matters nonvascular plants usually live in places that are damp. Also, Seedless plants play many roles in nonvascular plants are small. They grow on soil, the bark of the environment, including helping to form soil and preventing erosion. trees, and rocks. Mosses, liverworts, and hornworts don’t have true stems, roots, or leaves. They do, however, have structures Vocabulary that carry out the activities of stems, roots, and leaves. • rhizoid • rhizome Mosses Large groups of mosses cover soil or rocks with a mat of Graphic Organizer In your Science tiny green plants. Mosses have leafy stalks and rhizoids. A Journal, create a Venn Diagram that rhizoid is a rootlike structure that holds nonvascular plants in compares vascular plants and nonvas- place. Rhizoids help the plants get water and nutrients.
  • The Relationship Between Moss Growth and Treefall Gaps

    The Relationship Between Moss Growth and Treefall Gaps

    The Relationship between Moss Growth and Treefall Gaps BIOS 35502-01 Practicum in Field Biology Leah Ellman Advisor: Dr. Walter Carson Abstract: Mosses are a rarely studied component of treefall gaps in forest ecosystems – and ought to receive more attention due to their potential to promote or deter vascular seedling germination and survival. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine if there is a relationship between canopy gaps and moss growth along forest floors and to determine if there is a difference between the effect of canopy gaps on the depth and abundance of acrocarpous versus pleurocarpous mosses. The study took place in an eastern deciduous forest biome on the University of Notre Dame Environmental Research (UNDERC) property located between upper Michigan and Wisconsin. I paired treefall gap and closed canopy plots along bog border habitat and ran a single transect from east to west in all plots. I then recorded the number of moss beds, as well as bed depth(s), and moss type (acrocarpous/pleurocarpous) within a half meter of either side of the transects. Afterwards, I analyzed the data via regressions and paired t-tests, and found that while canopy gaps have no significant effect on moss depth, moss abundance was positively related to treefall gap presence. Introduction: Treefall gaps are key promoters of plant diversity in forest ecosystems. They are caused by disturbances such as windstorms and result in increased light availability on the forest floor which promotes the growth of shade intolerant plants and maintains forest diversity (Schnitzer and Carson, 2001; Spies and Franklin 1989; Brokaw, 1985; Brokaw, 1987; Abe et al.
  • A Brief History of Plants by Luke Wallace

    A Brief History of Plants by Luke Wallace

    A Brief History of Plants by Luke Wallace Let us skip the first two and a half their success on land. Today, these plants new group, the seed-bearing gymnosperms, billion years of the Earth’s history from only survive in the groups known as the Club came to dominate. Placed in this group is when organic compounds in our early mosses, Whisk fern, Horsetails and, a group I Ginkophyta (Ginkgo biloba being the only Evidence shows that atmosphere made the transition to single am sure we are all familiar with, the Ferns. extant member of this group), Gnetophyta, during the Permian celled organisms via the creation of It is in a small number of Fern species that Cycads and, of course, the Conifers. For the nucleotides, RNA and DNA. For the sake of era a new group, we first see the production of separate male most part, gymnosperms did relatively well brevity, we will also have to gloss over the the seed-bearing sperm cells and female egg cells, the earliest throughout the Permian, Triassic and Jurassic adaptive radiation of early multicellular known plant lineage capable of this biological periods, exhibiting much more diversity and gymnosperms, organisms that would eventually lead phenomenon. This is thought to be crucial abundance than we see now. to the colonisation of the land 425 - 475 came to dominate. to the evolution of seed-bearing plants. million years ago. These stories could not However, during the Jurassic, another group of Placed in this group Simply put, up until this point plants produced be done justice here! plants were rapidly growing in dominance and identical sex cells and relied on water to by the Cretaceous this new plant superpower is Ginkophyta, Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts (known bring these together.
  • The Ferns and Their Relatives (Lycophytes)

    The Ferns and Their Relatives (Lycophytes)

    N M D R maidenhair fern Adiantum pedatum sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis N D N N D D Christmas fern Polystichum acrostichoides bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum N D P P rattlesnake fern (top) Botrychium virginianum ebony spleenwort Asplenium platyneuron walking fern Asplenium rhizophyllum bronze grapefern (bottom) B. dissectum v. obliquum N N D D N N N R D D broad beech fern Phegopteris hexagonoptera royal fern Osmunda regalis N D N D common woodsia Woodsia obtusa scouring rush Equisetum hyemale adder’s tongue fern Ophioglossum vulgatum P P P P N D M R spinulose wood fern (left & inset) Dryopteris carthusiana marginal shield fern (right & inset) Dryopteris marginalis narrow-leaved glade fern Diplazium pycnocarpon M R N N D D purple cliff brake Pellaea atropurpurea shining fir moss Huperzia lucidula cinnamon fern Osmunda cinnamomea M R N M D R Appalachian filmy fern Trichomanes boschianum rock polypody Polypodium virginianum T N J D eastern marsh fern Thelypteris palustris silvery glade fern Deparia acrostichoides southern running pine Diphasiastrum digitatum T N J D T T black-footed quillwort Isoëtes melanopoda J Mexican mosquito fern Azolla mexicana J M R N N P P D D northern lady fern Athyrium felix-femina slender lip fern Cheilanthes feei net-veined chain fern Woodwardia areolata meadow spike moss Selaginella apoda water clover Marsilea quadrifolia Polypodiaceae Polypodium virginanum Dryopteris carthusiana he ferns and their relatives (lycophytes) living today give us a is tree shows a current concept of the Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris marginalis is poster made possible by: { Polystichum acrostichoides T evolutionary relationships among Onocleaceae Onoclea sensibilis glimpse of what the earth’s vegetation looked like hundreds of Blechnaceae Woodwardia areolata Illinois fern ( green ) and lycophyte Thelypteridaceae Phegopteris hexagonoptera millions of years ago when they were the dominant plants.
  • Plant Evolution and Diversity B. Importance of Plants C. Where Do Plants Fit, Evolutionarily? What Are the Defining Traits of Pl

    Plant Evolution and Diversity B. Importance of Plants C. Where Do Plants Fit, Evolutionarily? What Are the Defining Traits of Pl

    Plant Evolution and Diversity Reading: Chap. 30 A. Plants: fundamentals I. What is a plant? What does it do? A. Basic structure and function B. Why are plants important? - Photosynthesize C. What are plants, evolutionarily? -CO2 uptake D. Problems of living on land -O2 release II. Overview of major plant taxa - Water loss A. Bryophytes (seedless, nonvascular) - Water and nutrient uptake B. Pterophytes (seedless, vascular) C. Gymnosperms (seeds, vascular) -Grow D. Angiosperms (seeds, vascular, and flowers+fruits) Where? Which directions? II. Major evolutionary trends - Reproduce A. Vascular tissue, leaves, & roots B. Fertilization without water: pollen C. Dispersal: from spores to bare seeds to seeds in fruits D. Life cycles Æ reduction of gametophyte, dominance of sporophyte Fig. 1.10, Raven et al. B. Importance of plants C. Where do plants fit, evolutionarily? 1. Food – agriculture, ecosystems 2. Habitat 3. Fuel and fiber 4. Medicines 5. Ecosystem services How are protists related to higher plants? Algae are eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms that are not plants. Relationship to the protists What are the defining traits of plants? - Multicellular, eukaryotic, photosynthetic autotrophs - Cell chemistry: - Chlorophyll a and b - Cell walls of cellulose (plus other polymers) - Starch as a storage polymer - Most similar to some Chlorophyta: Charophyceans Fig. 29.8 Points 1. Photosynthetic protists are spread throughout many groups. 2. Plants are most closely related to the green algae, in particular, to the Charophyceans. Coleochaete 3.
  • Lingua Botanica the National Newsletter for FS Botanists & Plant Ecologists

    Lingua Botanica the National Newsletter for FS Botanists & Plant Ecologists

    Lingua Botanica The National Newsletter for FS Botanists & Plant Ecologists Many of you are laboring under a common mistaken belief and I’m going to clear this up once and for all. As a botanist for a major land management agency, you stand on the front lines of the battle for plant conservation. You are heavily armed with Federal law, regulation, and public opinion and you have more power than you can imagine to cultivate a future of botanical diversity on the lands of the people of the United States. But I’ve heard many botanists (and wildlife and fisheries biologists) talk about the importance of strong standards and guides in land management plans, planning rule language, strict NEPA compliance, and the utility of outside litigation in the fight to protect rare plants and their habitats. The mistake we too often make is to assume that the battle is won by the sword. This is a serious misconception. Just as Excalibur could not save Arthur and Beowulf died holding the broken hilt of Naegling, no blade, neither enchanted nor sacred, can by itself rend victory from darkness. No. No legal mumbo-jumbo, no order from a court, no legislative edict can assure the viability of a rare plant (or fish or critter) population. Don’t get me wrong, these things can be very helpful, but each of these weapons will fail, at some point, regardless of who is swinging them. But fear not, there is an answer. There is an answer that will guarantee that the resources to which we are dedicated are protected in perpetuity.