Maximum Size of the Spectacled Salamander, Salamandrina
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Distribution and Genetic Data Extend the Ranges of the Spectacled Salamanders, Genus Salamandrina, in the Apulia Region (South Italy)
Acta Herpetologica 6(2): 315-321, 2011 New distribution and genetic data extend the ranges of the spectacled salamanders, genus Salamandrina, in the Apulia region (South Italy) Cristiano Liuzzi1, Fabio Mastropasqua1, Daniele Salvi2 1 Societas Herpetologica Italica – sezione Puglia, Via Polignano 36, 70014 Conversano (BA), Italy. 2 CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal. Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted on: 2011, 11th October; revised on: 2011, 24th October; accepted on: 2011, 24th October. Abstract. Additional data on the distribution of the genus Salamandrina in the Apulia region (southern Italy) are provided. Based on fieldwork carried out from May to August 2011 in two new localities, Volturara Appula (Foggia province) and Spinazzola (Barletta province), the presence of Salamandrina species was recorded. Results from the genetic analyses of the 12S rRNA gene fragment from six individuals demonstrat- ed that S. perspicillata occurs in Volturara Appula while S. terdigitata in the Spinazzola locality. The latter species is reported for the first time for the Apulia region. These new distribution data represent considerable range extensions for the Salamandrina species, indicating that more surveys are needed to complement the existing knowl- edge on their distribution as well as of the herpetofauna from the Apulia region. The conservation implications of our findings are also discussed. Keywords. Salamandrina perspicillata, Salamandrina terdigitata, distribution, 12S rRNA, genetic diagnosis, Apulia, Italy. INTRODUCTION The genus Salamandrina, endemic to the Italian Peninsula, includes two vicariant species, the northern spectacled salamander S. perspicillata (Savi, 1821) and the southern spectacled salamander S. -
<I>Salamandra Salamandra</I>
International Journal of Speleology 46 (3) 321-329 Tampa, FL (USA) September 2017 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Subterranean systems provide a suitable overwintering habitat for Salamandra salamandra Monika Balogová1*, Dušan Jelić2, Michaela Kyselová1, and Marcel Uhrin1,3 1Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Šrobárova 2, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia 2Croatian Institute for Biodiversity, Lipovac I., br. 7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 3Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 1176, 165 21 Praha, Czech Republic Abstract: The fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) has been repeatedly noted to occur in natural and artificial subterranean systems. Despite the obvious connection of this species with underground shelters, their level of dependence and importance to the species is still not fully understood. In this study, we carried out long-term monitoring based on the capture-mark- recapture method in two wintering populations aggregated in extensive underground habitats. Using the POPAN model we found the population size in a natural shelter to be more than twice that of an artificial underground shelter. Survival and recapture probabilities calculated using the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model were very constant over time, with higher survival values in males than in females and juveniles, though in terms of recapture probability, the opposite situation was recorded. In addition, survival probability obtained from Cormack-Jolly-Seber model was higher than survival from POPAN model. The observed bigger population size and the lower recapture rate in the natural cave was probably a reflection of habitat complexity. -
<I>In Vivo</I> Sexual Discrimination in <I>Salamandrina Perspicillata</I
HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL 20: 17–24, 2010 In vivo sexual discrimination in Salamandrina perspicillata: a cross-check analysis of annual changes in external cloacal morphology and spermic urine release Leonardo Vignoli1, Romina Silici1, Rossana Brizzi2 & Marco A. Bologna1 1Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Università Roma Tre, Rome, Italy 2Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica “Leo Pardi”, Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy In Salamandrina, the lack of visible external sexual dimorphism makes the sexing of individuals difficult without sacrifice. The cloaca of Salamandrina in both males and females appears externally as a slit on an unswollen surface, a trait which is consistent throughout the year. Nonetheless, a slight divarication of its borders allows the recognition of three morphs (A, B and C), respectively characterizing male cloaca (all phases), female cloaca without protruding oviductal papillae (courtship phase) and female cloaca with prolapsed oviductal papillae (oviposition phase). Figures and schematic diagrams are provided to illustrate the differences in detail, which are all recognizable to the naked eye or by means of a hand magnifier. In addition to morphology, another reliable method of sexing salamanders is urine examination, albeit only during the courtship and post-courtship phases. Applying these methods for sex determination, we found a male- biased operational sex ratio in two populations, ranging from 6.6:1 (autumn–winter) to 14:1 (May). Males were confined to terrestrial environments, whereas females were also found in water during oviposition. Salamandrina perspicillata was active throughout the year, except during the hottest months (July–August). Key words: cloaca, salamander, sex determination, sex ratio, sexual dimorphism INTRODUCTION Hayes, 1998). Sexing based on behavioural differences requires direct observations, which often prove difficult. -
Is the Italian Stream Frog (Rana Italica Dubois, 1987) an Opportunistic Exploiter of Cave Twilight Zone?
A peer-reviewed open-access journal Subterranean IsBiology the Italian 25: 49–60 stream (2018) frog (Rana italica Dubois, 1987) an opportunistic exploiter... 49 doi: 10.3897/subtbiol.25.23803 SHORT COMMUNICATION Subterranean Published by http://subtbiol.pensoft.net The International Society Biology for Subterranean Biology Is the Italian stream frog (Rana italica Dubois, 1987) an opportunistic exploiter of cave twilight zone? Enrico Lunghi1,2,3, Giacomo Bruni4, Gentile Francesco Ficetola5,6, Raoul Manenti5 1 Universität Trier Fachbereich VI Raum-und Umweltwissenschaften Biogeographie, Universitätsring 15, 54286 Trier, Germany 2 Museo di Storia Naturale dell’Università di Firenze, Sezione di Zoologia “La Spe- cola”, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy 3 Natural Oasis, Via di Galceti 141, 59100 Prato, Italy 4 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Boulevard de la Plaine 2, 1050 Ixelles, Bruxelles, Belgium 5 Department of Environmen- tal Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy 6 Univ. Greno- ble Alpes, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Écologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000 Grenoble, France Corresponding author: Enrico Lunghi ([email protected]) Academic editor: O. Moldovan | Received 22 January 2018 | Accepted 9 March 2018 | Published 20 March 2018 http://zoobank.org/07A81673-E845-4056-B31C-6EADC6CA737C Citation: Lunghi E, Bruni G, Ficetola GF, Manenti R (2018) Is the Italian stream frog (Rana italica Dubois, 1987) an opportunistic exploiter of cave twilight zone? Subterranean Biology 25: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.25.23803 Abstract Studies on frogs exploiting subterranean environments are extremely scarce, as these Amphibians are usually considered accidental in these environments. However, according to recent studies, some anurans actively select subterranean environments on the basis of specific environmental features, and thus are able to inhabit these environments throughout the year. -
50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) § 16.14
§ 15.41 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) Species Common name Serinus canaria ............................................................. Common Canary. 1 Note: Permits are still required for this species under part 17 of this chapter. (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list 16.14 Importation of live or dead amphib- in this paragraph includes species of ians or their eggs. non-captive-bred exotic birds and coun- 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their tries for which importation into the eggs. United States is not prohibited by sec- Subpart C—Permits tion 15.11. The species are grouped tax- onomically by order, and may only be 16.22 Injurious wildlife permits. imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit Subpart D—Additional Exemptions issued pursuant to subpart C of this 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies. part. 16.33 Importation of natural-history speci- [59 FR 62262, Dec. 2, 1994, as amended at 61 mens. FR 2093, Jan. 24, 1996; 82 FR 16540, Apr. 5, AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42. 2017] SOURCE: 39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, unless oth- erwise noted. Subpart E—Qualifying Facilities Breeding Exotic Birds in Captivity Subpart A—Introduction § 15.41 Criteria for including facilities as qualifying for imports. [Re- § 16.1 Purpose of regulations. served] The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 § 15.42 List of foreign qualifying breed- U.S.C. 42). ing facilities. [Reserved] § 16.2 Scope of regulations. Subpart F—List of Prohibited Spe- The provisions of this part are in ad- cies Not Listed in the Appen- dition to, and are not in lieu of, other dices to the Convention regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe addi- § 15.51 Criteria for including species tional restrictions or conditions for the and countries in the prohibited list. -
The Evolution of Pueriparity Maintains Multiple Paternity in a Polymorphic Viviparous Salamander Lucía Alarcón‑Ríos 1*, Alfredo G
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The evolution of pueriparity maintains multiple paternity in a polymorphic viviparous salamander Lucía Alarcón‑Ríos 1*, Alfredo G. Nicieza 1,2, André Lourenço 3,4 & Guillermo Velo‑Antón 3* The reduction in fecundity associated with the evolution of viviparity may have far‑reaching implications for the ecology, demography, and evolution of populations. The evolution of a polygamous behaviour (e.g. polyandry) may counteract some of the efects underlying a lower fecundity, such as the reduction in genetic diversity. Comparing patterns of multiple paternity between reproductive modes allows us to understand how viviparity accounts for the trade-of between ofspring quality and quantity. We analysed genetic patterns of paternity and ofspring genetic diversity across 42 families from two modes of viviparity in a reproductive polymorphic species, Salamandra salamandra. This species shows an ancestral (larviparity: large clutches of free aquatic larvae), and a derived reproductive mode (pueriparity: smaller clutches of larger terrestrial juveniles). Our results confrm the existence of multiple paternity in pueriparous salamanders. Furthermore, we show the evolution of pueriparity maintains, and even increases, the occurrence of multiple paternity and the number of sires compared to larviparity, though we did not fnd a clear efect on genetic diversity. High incidence of multiple paternity in pueriparous populations might arise as a mechanism to avoid fertilization failures and to ensure reproductive success, and thus has important implications in highly isolated populations with small broods. Te evolution of viviparity entails pronounced changes in individuals’ reproductive biology and behaviour and, by extension, on population dynamics1–3. For example, viviparous species ofen show an increased parental invest- ment compared to oviparous ones because they produce larger and more developed ofspring that are protected from external pressures for longer periods within the mother 4–7. -
Strasbourg, 22 May 2002
Strasbourg, 21 October 2015 T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 [Inf18e_2015.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 35th meeting Strasbourg, 1-4 December 2015 GROUP OF EXPERTS ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES 1-2 July 2015 Bern, Switzerland - NATIONAL REPORTS - Compilation prepared by the Directorate of Democratic Governance / The reports are being circulated in the form and the languages in which they were received by the Secretariat. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 - 2 – CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE __________ 1. Armenia / Arménie 2. Austria / Autriche 3. Belgium / Belgique 4. Croatia / Croatie 5. Estonia / Estonie 6. France / France 7. Italy /Italie 8. Latvia / Lettonie 9. Liechtenstein / Liechtenstein 10. Malta / Malte 11. Monaco / Monaco 12. The Netherlands / Pays-Bas 13. Poland / Pologne 14. Slovak Republic /République slovaque 15. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” / L’« ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine » 16. Ukraine - 3 - T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 ARMENIA / ARMENIE NATIONAL REPORT OF REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON NATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND INITIATIVES ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COUNTRY AND ITS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Armenia is a small landlocked mountainous country located in the Southern Caucasus. Forty four percent of the territory of Armenia is a high mountainous area not suitable for inhabitation. The degree of land use is strongly unproportional. The zones under intensive development make 18.2% of the territory of Armenia with concentration of 87.7% of total population. -
Evaluating the Impacts of Small Impoundments on Stream Salamanders
AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. (2016) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2664 Evaluating the impacts of small impoundments on stream salamanders JEFFERY KIRCHBERGa, KRISTEN K. CECALAa,*, STEVEN J. PRICEb, EMILY M. WHITEc and DAVID G. HASKELLa aDepartment of Biology, University of the South, TN, USA bDepartment of Forestry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA cDepartment of Chemistry, University of the South, USA ABSTRACT 1. Large dams have been repeatedly implicated in declines of riverine species, but the impacts of small dams are largely understudied. The placement of small dams (< 5 m high) on headwater streams, their density, and lack of regulation suggests that these dams may also have significant adverse impacts on headwater biota. 2. The objective of this study was to determine whether small impoundments affect downstream salamander abundance and water quality. Salamanders were identified and counted from 10 paired catchments draining either a small impoundment (< 0.8 ha) or a free-flowing stream. A binomial mixture model was used to estimate abundance after accounting for incomplete detection. 3. Estimated abundance of larval Desmognathus conanti, Eurycea wilderae, and Pseudotriton ruber was 3.9, 19.6, and 9.8 times greater downstream of small impoundments than in unaltered streams. Iron concentrations and pH had positive effects on salamander abundance while conductivity was negatively associated with salamander abundance. 4. Increases in abundance may be due to increased hydrologic stability below dams, different geomorphology, and altered water quality. Despite their small size, small impoundments can have localized, downstream effects on water chemistry and species abundance and may create high quality habitat for some stream species in a heterogeneous landscape. -
Salamander Species Listed As Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016
Salamander Species Listed as Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016 Effective January 28, 2016, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The listing includes all species in these 20 genera: Chioglossa, Cynops, Euproctus, Hydromantes, Hynobius, Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Neurergus, Notophthalmus, Onychodactylus, Paramesotriton, Plethodon, Pleurodeles, Salamandra, Salamandrella, Salamandrina, Siren, Taricha, Triturus, and Tylototriton The species are: (1) Chioglossa lusitanica (golden striped salamander). (2) Cynops chenggongensis (Chenggong fire-bellied newt). (3) Cynops cyanurus (blue-tailed fire-bellied newt). (4) Cynops ensicauda (sword-tailed newt). (5) Cynops fudingensis (Fuding fire-bellied newt). (6) Cynops glaucus (bluish grey newt, Huilan Rongyuan). (7) Cynops orientalis (Oriental fire belly newt, Oriental fire-bellied newt). (8) Cynops orphicus (no common name). (9) Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese newt, Japanese fire-bellied newt). (10) Cynops wolterstorffi (Kunming Lake newt). (11) Euproctus montanus (Corsican brook salamander). (12) Euproctus platycephalus (Sardinian brook salamander). (13) Hydromantes ambrosii (Ambrosi salamander). (14) Hydromantes brunus (limestone salamander). (15) Hydromantes flavus (Mount Albo cave salamander). -
Body Malformations in a Forest-Dwelling Salamander, Salamandrina Perspicillata (Savi, 1821)
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12:16–23. Submitted: 24 June 2016; Accepted 8 December 2016; Published: 30 April 2017. Body Malformations in a Forest-dwelling Salamander, Salamandrina perspicillata (Savi, 1821) Antonio Romano1,4, Ignazio Avella2, and Daniele Scinti Roger3 1Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Biologia Agroambientale e Forestale, Via Salaria km 29,300, 00015 Monterotondo, RM, Italy 2SRSN - Società Romana di Scienze Naturali, via Fratelli Maristi 43, 00137 Rome, Italy 3ARDEA - Associazione per la Ricerca, la Divulgazione e l’Educazione Ambientale, via Ventilabro 6, 80126, Naples, Italy 4Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—High percentages of body malformations are considered auxiliary indicators of global amphibian decline. However, information on their frequency in natural populations are rarely provided and sample sizes are often small, particularly for newts and salamanders. In this study we report on the malformations of a population of the Spectacled Salamander (Salamandrina perspicillata). We sampled 508 salamanders and assigned body malformations to four main categories. We found one salamander with a bifid tail, an extremely rare abnormality among urodeles, and three types of limb malformations in slightly more than 8% of the salamanders. Females were significantly more malformed than males (P < 0.05) and the three limb abnormalities differed significantly in their prevalence, both when pooling all salamanders and when considering sexes separately (P < 0.001 in all comparisons). The percentage of malformed individuals largely exceeded what is expected in healthy populations. However, the study site was characterized by low anthropogenic pressure. We suggest some potential causes of the observed malformations including massive trematode parasites infections and the trampling of ungulates that may cause severe injuries on these small salamanders. -
Book of Abstracts
Abstracts Contents Schedules 4 Plenary Lectures 9 “Highlight of Zoological Research” Symposium 13 Evolutionary Biology Symposium 14 Neurobiology Symposium 27 Zoological Systematics Symposium 34 Physiology Symposium 41 Behavioral Biology Symposium 48 Ecology Symposium 57 Developmental Biology Symposium 63 Morphology Symposium 69 Women in Science Symposium 75 Special Events 78 Evolutionary Biology Posters (EB) 80 Neurobiology Posters (N) 101 Zoological Systematics Posters (ZS) 125 Physiology Posters (P) 134 Behavioral Biology Posters (BB) 151 Ecology Posters (E) 169 Developmental Biology Posters (DB) 175 Morphology Posters (M) 183 Index 193 4 Schedules Schedules 5 6 Schedules Schedules 7 8 Plenary Lectures Plenary Lectures Plenary Lectures 9 Plenary Lectures (In the order of presentation schedule) Hybridization and the nature of biodiversity J. MALLET Galton Laboratory, Dept. of Biology, University College London The evolution of new species, or 'speciation', is often regarded by biologists as a difficult problem. This seems to me largely an artefact of a rigid and highly non-Darwinian concept of what species are. Species are regarded by many biologists even today as 'real', distinct units of biodiversity in nature, and indeed as the only real taxonomic level in nature (for instance, the genus, the population, and the subspecies are not held in such high regard). This idea was proposed along with theories of 'reproductive isolation' and the 'biological species concept' 65 years ago, around the time that Stalin, Hitler, Franco, and Mussolini ruled much of Europe. Recent genetic data from natural populations tell us that natural hybridization between species is common, and that the need for complete reproductive isolation and the concomitant difficulty of speciation have both been overstated. -
Functional Morphology of Terrestrial Prey Capture in Salamandrid Salamanders Charlotte M
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 3896-3907 doi:10.1242/jeb.164285 RESEARCH ARTICLE Functional morphology of terrestrial prey capture in salamandrid salamanders Charlotte M. Stinson1,2,* and Stephen M. Deban2 ABSTRACT salamanders with more robust and mineralized hyobranchial Salamanders use the hyobranchial apparatus and its associated apparatus produce greater fluid velocity during suction-feeding musculature for tongue projection on land and for suction feeding in events (Özeti and Wake, 1969; Miller and Larsen, 1989; Stinson and water. Hyobranchial apparatus composition and morphology vary Deban, 2017). Our understanding of the direct effects of across species, and different morphologies are better suited for morphology on terrestrial feeding performance, and the trade-offs feeding in aquatic versus terrestrial environments. We hypothesize that may accompany feeding across aquatic and terrestrial that differences in hyobranchial morphology result in functional trade- environments, however, is limited (Beneski et al., 1995; Larsen offs in feeding performance. We predict that semi-aquatic and aquatic et al., 1996, 1989; Miller and Larsen, 1990). In this study, we salamandrids with hyobranchial morphology suited for aquatic compared the morphology and tongue-projection performance of feeding will have lower performance, in terms of tongue-projection terrestrial, semi-aquatic and aquatic salamandrids to assess distance, velocity, acceleration and power, compared with terrestrial