City of San Carlos Fuel Management Project Addendum B – Cultural Resources Inventory Report

April 14, 2019

Amy Newby, Director City of San Carlos Department of Parks and Recreation 600 Elm Street San Carlos, CA 94070

Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, – Negative Findings

Dear Ms. Newby:

This letter documents the negative cultural resources inventory conducted by Dudek for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project (Project), located in the City of San Carlos, California. The City of San Carlos (City) is lead agency responsible for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). All cultural resource fieldwork and reporting for this project has been conducted by archaeologists meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards. A Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) search did not suggest the presence of any Native American cultural resources. A Northwest Information Center (NWIC) records search indicated that no cultural resources have been recorded within the area of potential effects (APE). Intensive-level pedestrian survey conducted of the APE did not identify cultural resources.

PROJECT LOCATION DESCRIPTION

The Project site is located in the southern portion of the City of San Carlos. The Project site is situated in Sections 14, 22, and 23, Township 18 South, Range 17 East and the very western portion of Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, on the Woodside U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- topographic quadrangles (Figure 1). The Project site is divided into four sections, each located in four parks within the city limits: Eaton Park, Big Canyon Park, Crestview Park, and Highlands Park (Figures 2 and 3). The parks are currently in use and contain athletic fields, parking lots, and hiking trails. All sections of the project area are extremely sloped with elevations ranging from 270 feet to 760 feet above mean sea level.

The Project consists of vegetation treatment or removal in an effort to reduce wildfire fuel to ensure safety of the surrounding community. The City proposes to treat vegetation in selected areas of

Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

Eaton Park, Big Canyon Park, Crestview Park, and Highlands Park. The City has described three main goals for the Project:

 Conduct targeted fuel reduction treatments using hand crews, masticators, track chippers, herbicides, and herbivory to reduce highly combustible underbrush and other flammable vegetation within the defensible space zone of adjacent private ownerships.

 Create strategic fuel breaks using hand crews, masticators, track chippers, and herbivory to reduce highly combustible underbrush and other flammable vegetation along access roads and ridgelines

 Remove dead/diseased and non-native shrubs/trees as part of a comprehensive fuel reduction effort.

Maximum acreage of vegetation treatment consists 65.3 acres in Eaton Park, of 55.3 acres in Big Canyon Park, 3.4 acres in Crestview Park, and 7.4 acres in Highlands Park. The Project APE consists of all the areas of vegetation treatment, totaling 131.4 acres.

REGULATORY CONTEXT

While the Project as currently planned is subject only to state and local regulatory conditions, all work has been conducted in compliance with federal regulations as well. As such, federal regulations are also provided here for reference should they be required in the future.

Federal Regulations

National Historic Preservation Act

The NHPA established the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the President’s Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), and provided that states may establish State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs) to carry out some of the functions of the NHPA. Most significantly for federal agencies responsible for managing cultural resources, Section 106 of the NHPA directs that “[t]he head of any Federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking in any State and the head of any Federal department or independent agency having authority to license any undertaking shall, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, as the case may be, take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP.” Section 106 also affords the ACHP a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking (16 USC 470f).

11719 2 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

36 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 800 (36 CFR 800) implements Section 106 of the NHPA. It defines the steps necessary to identify historic properties (those cultural resources listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP), including consultation with federally recognized Native American tribes to identify resources with important cultural values; to determine whether or not they may be adversely affected by a proposed undertaking; and the process for eliminating, reducing, or mitigating the adverse effects.

The content of 36 CFR 60.4 defines criteria for determining eligibility for listing in the NRHP. The significance of cultural resources identified during an inventory must be formally evaluated for historic significance in consultation with the California SHPO to determine if the resources are eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. Cultural resources may be considered eligible for listing if they possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The criteria for determining eligibility are essentially the same in content and order as those outlined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), but the criteria under NHPA are labeled A through D (rather than 1-4 under CEQA).

Regarding criteria A through D of Section 106, the quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, cultural resources, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and that:

A. are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history [36 CFR 60.4]. The current cultural resources inventory is not designed to generate enough data to make eligibility recommendations on previously recorded cultural resources that are outside of the project area, or newly discovered cultural resources; such determinations are typically made during a subsequent evaluation phase (e.g., excavations at prehistoric sites). However, the survey was designed to generate enough information to provide informal assessments of eligibility to help guide management considerations.

11719 3 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

State of California

The California Register of Historical Resources

In California, the term “historical resource” includes “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California” (Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(j)). In 1992, the California legislature established the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change” (PRC Section 5024.1(a)). The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR, enumerated in the following text, were developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP. According to PRC Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity,” and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria:

(1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history

To understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2)).

The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are state landmarks and points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys.

11719 4 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

California Environmental Quality Act

As described further in the following text, the following CEQA statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:

PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.” PRC Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) define “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource.” It also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of a historical resource. PRC Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” PRC Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) set forth standards and steps to be employed following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony.

Commission (NAHC) to resolve disputes regarding the disposition of such remains. In addition, the Native American Historic Resource Protection Act makes it a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail, to deface or destroy a Native American historic or cultural site that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the CRHR.

California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5

California law protects Native American burials, skeletal remains, and associated grave goods, regardless of their antiquity, and provides for the sensitive treatment and disposition of those remains. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered in any place other than a dedicated cemetery, no further disturbance or excavation of the site or nearby area reasonably suspected to contain human remains can occur until the County Coroner has examined the remains (Section 7050.5b). PRC Section 5097.98 also outlines the process to be followed in the event that remains are discovered. If the County Coroner determines or has reason to believe the remains are those of a Native American, the coroner must contact the California NAHC within 24 hours (Section 7050.5c). The NAHC will notify the Most Likely Descendant. With the permission of the landowner, the Most Likely Descendant may inspect the site of discovery. The inspection must be completed within 48 hours of notification of the Most Likely Descendant by the NAHC. The Most Likely Descendant may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and items associated with Native Americans. PRC Sections 21083.2(b)–(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 provide information regarding the mitigation framework for archaeological and historic resources,

11719 5 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings including examples of preservation-in-place mitigation measures; preservation-in-place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context, and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s).

Under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)). If a site is either listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historic resources, or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(q)), it is a “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource, even if it does not fall within this presumption (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)).

A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(1); PRC Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, the significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project does any of the following:

(1) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register; or (2) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or (3) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register as

11719 6 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA [CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(2)].

Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance is materially impaired.

If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (Section 21083.2(a), (b), and (c)).

Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:

(1) Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information (2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type (3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person

Impacts to nonunique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (PRC Section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(4)). However, if a nonunique archaeological resource qualifies as tribal cultural resource (PRC 21074(c); 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described in the following text, these procedures are detailed in PRC Section 5097.98.

California State Assembly Bill 52

Assembly Bill (AB) 52 of 2014 amended PRC Section 5097.94 and added PRC Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3. AB 52 established that Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) must be considered under CEQA and also provided for additional Native American consultation requirements for the lead agency. Section 21074 describes a TCR

11719 7 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object that is considered of cultural value to a California Native American Tribe. A TCR is either:

 On the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historic register; Eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historic register; or  A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. AB 52 formalizes the lead agency–tribal consultation process, requiring the lead agency to initiate consultation with California Native American groups that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project, including tribes that may not be federally recognized. Lead agencies are required to begin consultation prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report.

Section 1 (a)(9) of AB 52 establishes that “a substantial adverse change to a tribal cultural resource has a significant effect on the environment.” Effects on tribal cultural resources should be considered under CEQA. Section 6 of AB 52 adds Section 21080.3.2 to the PRC, which states that parties may propose mitigation measures “capable of avoiding or substantially lessening potential significant impacts to a tribal cultural resource or alternatives that would avoid significant impacts to a tribal cultural resource.” Further, if a California Native American tribe requests consultation regarding project alternatives, mitigation measures, or significant effects to tribal cultural resources, the consultation shall include those topics (PRC Section 21080.3.2[a]). The environmental document and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (where applicable) shall include any mitigation measures that are adopted (PRC Section 21082.3[a]).

Native American Human Remains

State law (PRC Section 5097 et seq.) addresses the disposition of Native American burials in archaeological sites and protects such remains from disturbance, vandalism, or inadvertent destruction; establishes procedures to be implemented if Native American skeletal remains are discovered during construction of a project; and established the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).

In the event that Native American human remains or related cultural material are encountered, Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines (as incorporated from PRC Section 5097.98) and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 define the subsequent protocol. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, excavation or other disturbances shall be suspended of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains or related material. Protocol requires that a county-approved coroner be contacted in order

11719 8 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings to determine if the remains are of Native American origin. Should the coroner determine the remains to be Native American, the coroner must contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The most likely descendent may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98 (14 CCR 15064.5(e)).

NWIC RECORDS SEARCH

A records search of the APE and the surrounding one half-mile was completed by Dudek staff on March 1, 2019 (Confidential Appendix A). This search included their collection of mapped prehistoric, historical and built-environment resources, Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Site Records, technical reports, archival resources, and ethnographic references. Additional consulted sources included the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Inventory of Historical Resources/CRHR and listed OHP Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, and Caltrans Bridge Survey information.

Previously Conducted Studies:

NWIC records indicate that fifteen (15) previous cultural resources technical investigations have been conducted within a one half-mile of APE. Of these, none have included any portion of the current APE (Table 1).

Table 1. Previous technical studies within a one half-mile radius of the APE

Report Author Year Company Title Number Within One Half-Mile of the Project APE Preliminary archaeological reconnaissance of the Archaeological Consulting S-003016 Thomas L. Jackson 1977 proposed San Carlos Woods #2 site, San Carlos, and Research Services, Inc. California (letter report) Preliminary archaeological reconnaissance of the Archaeological Consulting S-003028 Thomas L. Jackson 1976 Lands of Pecar, San Carlos, California (letter and Research Services report) Archaeological Archaeological Resource Archeological Evaluation of the Hassler Health S-003049 Resource 1978 Management Home Property Management Archaeological Resource Archeological Evaluation of School Site #10, San S-003050 Robert Cartier 1978 Management Carlos Archaeological Resource Archeological Evaluation of Parcel APN 050-220- S-003097 Robert Cartier 1979 Management 150, Ruiz Subdivision Project New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet, FCC Form S-030651 Dana E. Supernowicz 2005 Earth Touch, Inc. 620, Brooks Property, SF-09041A

11719 9 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

Report Author Year Company Title Number Within One Half-Mile of the Project APE Cultural Resources Investigation for Verizon Site Archaeological Resources #183005 "Brittan Ave.", 2783 Melendy Drive, San S-036205 Carolyn Losee 2009 Technology Carlos, San Mateo County, California 94070 (letter report) New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet, FCC Form S-037276 Lorna Billat 2010 EarthTouch, Inc. 620, Heather Drive Water Tank, SF-13235A Archaeological Data Recovery Report (SMA-83) (ADRR) and Final Archaeological Resources Report (FARR), Public Utilities Basin Research Basin Research Associates, Commission, Water System Improvement S-040929 2013 Associates, Inc. Inc. Program, Bay Division Pipeline Reliability Upgrade Project, and Peninsula Bay Division Pipeline No. 5, Alameda and San Mateo Counties, California Cultural Resources Investigation for AT&T Mobility CCU2716 "Trinity Presbyterian/Blandford Archaeological Resources S-043285 Carolyn Losee 2013 & Somerset" 1106 Alameda De Las Pulgas, San Technology Carlos, San Mateo County, California 94070 (letter report) Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for AT&T Mobility, LLC Candidate Cher L. Peterson and Michael Brandman CNU5715 (Pebble Road & Palomar Road), 1175 S-043352 2013 Kathleen A. Crawford Associates Palomar Drive, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California, 94062 (APN 051-416-040). (letter report) Archaeological Overview and Assessment: S-046397 Tim Spillane 2014 BayArcheo Indigenous Sites of the GGNRA, 2014 Cultural Resources Survey, Edgewood and Crestview/EnSite #13172, 1175 Palomar Drive, S-050471 Virginia Clifton 2016 EBI Consulting Redwood City, San Mateo County, California 94062 FCC Form 620, New Tower ("NT") Submission S- Packet, 1175 Palomar Drive, Redwood City, San Stephen Forrest 2016 EBI Consulting 050471a Mateo County, CA 94062, Edgewood and Crestview/EnSite 13172 FCC_2016_1122_001, Edgewood and S- Office of Historic Julianne Polanco 2016 Crestview/EnSite #13172, 1175 Palomar Drive, 050471b Preservation Redwood City, San Mateo County, New Tower

Previously Identified Cultural Resources:

No cultural resources have been previously identified within the APE; however, seven (7) cultural resources have been recorded within the surrounding one half-mile records search area (Table 2; Confidential Appendix A).

11719 10 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

Dudek reviewed historical aerials (available since 1948) and topographic maps (available since 1940). These maps and aerial photographs did not indicate the presence of historical built- environment resources within the APE.

Table 2. Cultural resources in Relation to the APE

Primary Trinomial Name Age Description P-41-000029 CA-SMA-000024 Nelson 358 Prehistoric Prehistoric / Unknown P-41-000030 CA-SMA-000025 Nelson 359 Prehistoric Prehistoric / Unknown P-41-000031 CA-SMA-000026 Nelson 360 Prehistoric Prehistoric / Unknown P-41-000032 CA-SMA-000027 Nelson 361 Prehistoric Prehistoric / Unknown P-41-000070 CA-SMA-000066 Nelson 358 Prehistoric Prehistoric / Unknown P-41-000161 CA-SMA-000161H Hassler Health Home Historic Standing Structure CCC/WPA Property; P-41-002200 None Children's Building Historic Hospital

NAHC CORRESPONDENCE

Dudek requested a NAHC search of their Sacred Lands File on March 8, 2019 for the proposed project area. The NAHC provided results on March 13, 2019. This search did not indicate the presence of Native American sacred sites or cultural resources within this area or the surrounding one half-mile buffer (Appendix B). The NAHC additionally provided a list of Native American tribes and individuals/organizations that might have knowledge of cultural resources in this area.

The proposed project is subject to compliance with Assembly Bill 52 (PRC Section 21074), which requires consideration of impacts to “tribal cultural resources” as part of the CEQA process, and requires the CEQA lead agency to notify any groups (who have requested notification) of the proposed project who are traditionally or culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project. Because Assembly Bill 52 is a government-to-government process, all records of correspondence related to Assembly Bill 52 notification and any subsequent consultation are on file with the City.

METHODS

Intensive Pedestrian Survey

Dudek Archaeologist William Burns inspected all areas of the APE on March 12, 2019. No archaeological or historic-era built-environment artifacts or features were identified. Modern developments (concrete lined drainage ditches, hiking paths, park equipment and landscaping)

11719 11 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings were observed within the project area. All areas of the APE appeared to have either been previously disturbed through grading or landscaping of park areas or have extreme slopes indicating a low potential for archaeological resources. Assessment of each survey area is as follows.

Eaton Park is the largest survey area at 65.3 acres. The park appears relatively undisturbed with the exception of hiking trails. The park contains hills and canyons filled with oak, pine, bay trees, sagebrush, and poison oak. The vast majority of the park consists of slopes between 20° (37%) and 50° (120%). Much of the area was covered in grass reducing ground visibility to 20% overall. Artifacts and archaeological deposits were opportunistically sought after in exposed trails, areas of natural erosion, and animal burrows, particularly in more level areas. No cultural resources were observed.

Big Canyon Park is the largest survey area after Eaton Park at 55.3 acres. This park also consists entirely of hiking trails, some of which have been closed due to erosion. The park appears as relatively undisturbed as Eaton Park. The park contains hills and canyons filled with oak, pine, bay trees, sagebrush, and poison oak. The vast majority of the park consists of slopes between 20° and 50°. Much of the area was covered in grass reducing ground visibility to 20% overall. Artifacts and archaeological deposits were opportunistically sought out in exposed trails, areas of natural erosion, and animal burrows, especially in more level areas. No cultural resources were observed.

Crestview Park is a small park west of Big Canyon Park and is the smallest survey area at 3.4 acres. This survey area consists of landscaped areas surrounding a soccer field, a basketball court, and a parking lot. The park displays high levels of disturbance due to the park facilities and grading and landscaping surrounding it. The survey area is relatively flat adjacent to the athletic fields and then slopes down as one moves away from the fields in a 40° (84%) slope. Much of the area was covered in grass reducing ground visibility to 20% overall. Artifacts and archaeological deposits were opportunistically sought out in exposed trails, areas of natural erosion, and animal burrows, especially in more level areas. No cultural resources were observed.

Highlands Park is a small park north of Big Canyon Park with a survey area of 7.4 acres. This survey area consists of landscaped areas surrounding several mixed-use athletic fields. The park displays high levels of disturbance due to the park facilities and grading and landscaping surrounding it. The survey area is relatively flat adjacent to the athletic fields and then slopes down as one moves away from the fields in a 40° slope. The sloped area contains several modern concrete lined irrigation ditches. Much of the area was covered in grass reducing ground visibility to 20% overall. Artifacts and archaeological deposits were opportunistically sought out in exposed trails, areas of natural erosion, and animal burrows, especially in more level areas. No cultural resources were observed.

11719 12 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

GEOMORPHOLOGY

Archaeological Sensitivity

Potential for yet identified cultural resources in the vicinity was reviewed against geologic and topographic GIS data for the area and information from other near-by projects. The “archaeological sensitivity,” or potential to support the presence of buried prehistoric archaeological deposits, is generally interpreted based on geologic landform and environmental parameters (i.e., distance to water and landform slope). The landform in the area is comprised of Franciscan Complex generally associated with the Mesozoic. Several small drainages are present in the vicinity of the project area but no major drainages. The vast majority of the project area consists of extreme slopes ranging from 20° to 50°, which are topographically unsuited to provide for the formation of archaeological deposits. Based on review of this information, the project area is indicated to have a low-moderate potential for unanticipated buried cultural resources.

The likelihood for significant prehistoric archaeological sites to be present within the project area is considered low-moderate. Given the extreme slopes and the lack of permanent water, the most likely type of prehistoric site in this area would be related to non-intensive use and non-reoccurring activities. The potential for small historic-period sites such as trash scatters and water-related features within the project site is considered low due to extreme slopes.

SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

No archaeological resources were identified within the Project site or immediate vicinity as a result of intensive pedestrian survey, the CHRIS records search or NAHC SLF search. However, it is always possible that intact archaeological deposits are present at subsurface levels. Based on geomorphological evidence, the area has a relatively low potential to contain unanticipated cultural resources. Management recommendations to reduce potential impacts to unanticipated archaeological resources and human remains during work activities are provided below.

Unanticipated Archaeological Resources

All crews should be alerted to the potential to encounter archaeological material. In the event that cultural resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during work activities for the proposed project, all ground disturbing work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified specialist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Prehistoric archaeological deposits may be indicated by the presence of discolored or dark soil, fire-affected material, concentrations of fragmented or whole freshwater bivalves shell, burned or complete bone, non-local lithic materials, or the characteristic observed to be atypical

11719 13 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings of the surrounding area. Common prehistoric artifacts may include modified or battered lithic materials; lithic or bone tools that appeared to have been used for chopping, drilling, or grinding; projectile points; fired clay ceramics or non-functional items; and other items. Historic-age deposits are often indicated by the presence of glass bottles and shards, ceramic material, building or domestic refuse, ferrous metal, or old features such as concrete foundations or privies. Depending upon the significance of the find under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5(f); PRC Section 21082), the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery may be warranted.

Unanticipated Human Remains

In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the county coroner shall be immediately notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the county coroner has determined, within 2 working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the county coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendant from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendant shall complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains.

Should you have any questions relating to this report and its findings please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Respectfully Submitted,

______

William Burns, MSc., RPA Archaeologist DUDEK T: 760.334.1156 [email protected]

11719 14 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings cc: Adam Giacinto, Dudek

Att: Figure 1. Project Location Figure 2-3. Project Survey Areas Appendix A: NWIC Records Search Information (Confidential) Appendix B: NAHC Search Results

11719 15 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11719 16 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE INFORMATION

Authors: William Burns M.Sc, RPA and Adam Giacinto, M.A., RPA

Firm: Dudek

Client/Project Proponent: City of San Carlos

Report Date: 4/14/2019

Report Title: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

Type of Study: Cultural Resources Inventory

New Sites: None

Updated Sites: None

USGS Quad: Woodside 7.5-minute

Acreage: Approximately 131 acres

Key Words: Negative survey; San Carlos;

11719 17 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11719 18 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

11719 19 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11719 20 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

11719 21 April 2019

Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11719 22 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

11719 23 April 2019 Subject: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos, California – Negative Findings

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

11719 24 April 2019

APPENDIX A NWIC Records Search Information (Confidential)

3/1/2019

Records Search Summary

NWIC File 18-1656

On March 1, 2019, Sarah Brewer performed an in-house records search at the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System in Rohnert Park, California for the San Carlos Fuel Management Project (Dudek Project No 11719). The project is located on the USGS 7.5’ San Mateo and Woodside Quadrangles. The results of the records search is as follows:

Resources within project area: None

Resources within 0.5-mile radius of project area: P-41-29, P-41-30, P-41-31, P-41-32, P-41-70, P-41- 161, P-41-2200

Studies within project area: None

Studies within 0.5-mile radius of project area: S-3016, S-3028, S-3049, S-3050, S-3097, S-30651, S-36205, S-37276, S-40929, S-43285, S-43352, S- 46397, S-50471,

Archival research: Resource database (list):  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Resource database (table):  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Studies database (list):  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Studies database (table):  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Resource record copies:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Studies record copies:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested OHP Historic Properties Directory:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976):  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Caltrans Bridge Survey:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Ethnographic Information:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Historical Literature:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Historical Maps:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Local Inventories:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested Shipwreck Inventory:  enclosed  reviewed  nothing listed  not requested

P-41-000032

P-41-000030 P-41-000029

P-41-000031

P-41-000161

P-41-002200

P-41-000070

Study Area 1/2 Mile Buffer Resource Resource (Approximate Location) Date: 3/18/2019 - Last saved by: mwatson - Path: Z:\Projects\j1171901\MAPDOC\Cultural\RS_Results\AppendixB1.mxd - Path: mwatson by: saved Last - 3/18/2019 Date: SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series San Mateo & Woodside Quadrangles Township 5S; Range 4W; Sections 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27 021,000 ,000 Feet Confidential Appendix B1 0 250 500 Meters 1:24,000 San Carlos Fuel Management Project Resource List

Primary No. Trinomial Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports

P-41-000029 CA-SMA-000024 Resource Name - Nelson 358 (?) Site Prehistoric AP01 (Unknown) P-41-000030 CA-SMA-000025 Resource Name - Nelson 359 Site Prehistoric AP01 (Unknown) P-41-000031 CA-SMA-000026 Resource Name - Nelson 360 Site Prehistoric AP01 (Unknown) P-41-000032 CA-SMA-000027 Resource Name - Nelson 361 Site Prehistoric AP01 (Unknown) P-41-000070 CA-SMA-000066 Resource Name - Nelson 358 Site Prehistoric AP01 (Unknown) P-41-000161 CA-SMA-000161H Resource Name - Hassler Health Building Historic AH15 1978 (Robert Cartier) S-003049 Home P-41-002200 Resource Name - Children's Building Historic HP35; HP41 1997 (Alice Estill Miller); Building; 2012 (OHP HPD listing) Other - Children's Building, Hassler Health Home; Other - Redwood Center; Voided - P-41-001811 (duplicate resource); OHP PRN - DOE-41-97-0003- 0000; OHP Property Number - 107065

Page 1 of 1 NWIC 3/1/2019 2:50:34 PM

METADATA SHEET

P‐41‐001811

The Primary Number has been voided because this resource was inadvertently assigned two

Primary Numbers. Please see the following Primary Number:

P-41-002200

Date: August 12, 2014

NWIC Staff: Annette Neal

S-003097

S-037276 S-036205 S-003050

S-043285 S-003028

S-003016

S-046397 S-040929

S-043352 S-050471

S-030651

S-003049

Study Area Report S-003050 1/2 Mile Buffer S-003016 S-003097 Report S-003028 S-040929 (Approximate Location) S-003049 S-050471 S-046397 Date: 3/18/2019 - Last saved by: mwatson - Path: Z:\Projects\j1171901\MAPDOC\Cultural\Appendix B\AppendixB2.mxd Z:\Projects\j1171901\MAPDOC\Cultural\Appendix - Path: mwatson by: saved Last - 3/18/2019 Date: SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series San Mateo & Woodside Quadrangles Township 5S; Range 4W; Sections 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27 021,000 ,000 Feet Confidential Appendix B2 0 250 500 Meters 1:24,000 San Carlos Fuel Management Project Report List

Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources

S-003016 Voided - E-14 SMA 1977 Thomas L. Jackson Preliminary archaeological reconnaissance of Archaeological Consulting the proposed San Carlos Woods #2 site, San and Research Services, Inc. Carlos, California (letter report) S-003028 Other - E-26 SMA 1976 Thomas L. Jackson Preliminary archaeological reconnaissance of Archaeological Consulting the Lands of Pecar, San Carlos, California and Research Services (letter report) S-003049 Voided - E-47 SMA 1978 Archeological Evaluation of the Hassler Archaeological Resource 41-000161 Health Home Property Management S-003050 Voided - E-48 SMA 1978 Robert Cartier Archeological Evaluation of School Site #10, Archaeological Resource San Carlos Management S-003097 Voided - E-97 SMA 1979 Robert Cartier Archeological Evaluation of Parcel APN 050- Archaeological Resource 220-150, Ruiz Subdivision Project Management S-030651 2005 Dana E. Supernowicz New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet, FCC Earth Touch, Inc. Form 620, Brooks Property, SF-09041A S-036205 2009 Carolyn Losee Cultural Resources Investigation for Verizon Archaeological Resources Site #183005 "Brittan Ave.", 2783 Melendy Technology Drive, San Carlos, San Mateo County, California 94070 (letter report) S-037276 Submitter - Heather 2010 Lorna Billat New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet, FCC EarthTouch, Inc. Drive Water Tank; Form 620, Heather Drive Water Tank, SF- Submitter - SF- 13235A 132235A S-040929 2013 Archaeological Data Recovery Report (SMA- Basin Research Associates, 41-000086, 41-000233, 41-000262, 83) (ADRR) and Final Archaeological Inc. 41-000270, 41-000299, 41-000303, Resources Report (FARR), San Francisco 41-002242, 41-002319 Public Utilities Commission, Water System Improvement Program, Bay Division Pipeline Reliability Upgrade Project, East Bay and Peninsula Bay Division Pipeline No. 5, Alameda and San Mateo Counties, California S-043285 2013 Carolyn Losee Cultural Resources Investigation for AT&T Archaeological Resources Mobility CCU2716 "Trinity Technology Presbyterian/Blandford & Somerset" 1106 Alameda De Las Pulgas, San Carlos, San Mateo County, California 94070 (letter report)

Page 1 of 2 NWIC 3/1/2019 2:50:05 PM Report List

Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources

S-043352 2013 Cher L. Peterson and Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Michael Brandman Kathleen A. Crawford Visit Results for AT&T Mobility, LLC Associates Candidate CNU5715 (Pebble Road & Palomar Road), 1175 Palomar Drive, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California, 94062 (APN 051-416-040). (letter report) S-046397 2014 Tim Spillane Archaeological Overview and Assessment: BayArcheo 21-000072, 21-000073, 21-000074, Indigenous Sites of the GGNRA, 2014 21-000075, 21-000224, 21-000311, 21-000312, 21-000313, 21-000314, 21-000317, 21-000367, 21-000430, 21-000431, 21-000432, 21-000460, 21-000470, 21-000473, 21-000496, 21-000526, 21-000611, 21-000612, 21-000629, 21-000632, 21-000638, 21-002550, 21-002552, 21-002615, 21-002665, 21-002701, 21-002819, 38-000005, 38-000006, 38-000021, 38-000026, 38-000029, 38-000030, 38-000031, 38-000097, 38-000162, 38-004945, 38-004947, 38-004948, 41-000004, 41-000075, 41-000116, 41-000117, 41-000128, 41-000134, 41-000149, 41-000150, 41-000264, 41-000272, 41-000456, 41-002352 S-050471 OTIS Report 2016 Virginia Clifton Cultural Resources Survey, Edgewood and EBI Consulting Number - Crestview/EnSite #13172, 1175 Palomar FCC_2016_1122_001 Drive, Redwood City, San Mateo County, ; California 94062 Submitter - EBI Project No. 6116003420 S-050471a 2016 Stephen Forrest FCC Form 620, New Tower ("NT") EBI Consulting Submission Packet, 1175 Palomar Drive, Redwood City, San Mateo County, CA 94062, Edgewood and Crestview/EnSite 13172 S-050471b 2016 Julianne Polanco FCC_2016_1122_001, Edgewood and Office of Historic Crestview/EnSite #13172, 1175 Palomar Preservation Drive, Redwood City, San Mateo County, New Tower

Page 2 of 2 NWIC 3/1/2019 2:50:06 PM CALIFORNIA OHP ARCHEOLOGICAL DETERMINATIONS OF ELIGIBILITY SAN MATEO COUNTY 10:10:08 04-05-12 PAGE 264 SITE-NUMBER. PRIMARY-NUM NRS EVL-DATE PROGRAM REF ...... EVAL OTHER NAMES AND NUMBERS ......

SMA-000151 41-000001 lS 02/23/78 78000771 KPNP u.c. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FACILITY NO . SMA-151 UC-ARF 61,62,63 SMA-000162 41-000162 6Y 10/30/86 ADOE-41-86-001-000 RJPR DOT-04-SMA-1-2 6Y 10/30/86 FHWA860919A RJPR SMA-000232 41-000230 6Y 07/17/95 ADOE-41-95-002-000 SGPR 82-9A 6Y 07/17/95 FHWA950714X SGPR SMA-000233 41-000231 6Y 07/17/95 ADOE-41-95-003-000 SGPR 6Y 07/17/95 FHWA950714X SGPR SMA-000299 6Y 12/27/95 ADOE-41-95-001-000 GRPR 6Y 12/27/95 UMTA900828A GRPR SMA-000336H 6Y 04/04/94 ADOE-41-94-003-000 GRPR 6Y 04/04/94 GSA940322A GRPR SMA-000337H 41-000279 6Y 04/04/94 ADOE-41-94-001-000 GRPR 6Y 04/04/94 GSA940322A GRPR SMA-000338H 41-000280 6Y 04/04/94 ADOE-41-94-002-000 GRPR 6Y 04/04/94 GSA940322A GRPR SMA-000353H 6Y 08/06/07 FTA040913A CFPR PN-1 SMA-000378H 6Y 08/06/07 FTA040913A CFPR FT-2 SMA-00353HH 6Y 08/06/07 FTA040913A CFPR SMA-00378HH 6Y 08/06/07 FTA040913A CFPR SMA-Z00003 6Y2 04/20/10 FCC100311B JSPR PREHISTORIC LITHIC SCATTER, S-022606 :if

1fJ!!'t ----..Ill!!!!!!!!!!!!-~: -'-~ ~Vl ,_ ~~ ~· ~- .~----..

CALIFORNIA INVENTORY OF ~ , I HISTORIC RESOURCES ~' March 1976 I

Edmund G. Brown Jr. Claire T. Dedrick Governor Secretary for Resources · State of California • i Herbert Rhodes ~ Director JO Department ofParks and Recreation

State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION P.O. Box 2390 Sacramento 95811 / / / SAN MATEO COliNTY - 75 SITES (ALSO 152 •LATHROP HOUSE. 627 HAMILTON ST., REDWOOQ QJ'Y. THEME.· ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES)•• ARCHITECTURE. LAWRENCE,(W.H.) HOUSE. 809 LAWRENCE ROAD, SAN MATEO. ANO NUEVO LIGHT STATION. HIGHWAY 1, THEME: ARCHITECTURE. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. ANZA EXPEDITION CAMP. ARROYO COURT, NORTHSIDE THIRD MARTIN,(W.J.) HOME. CORNER OF EUCALYPTUS ANO GRAND AVENUE, SAN MATEO. THEME: EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. AVENUES, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. ANZA EXPEDITION CAMP. BU RLINGAME. THEME: EXPLOKATION/ MARTINEZ,(MAXIMO) RESIDENCE SITE. INTERSECTION OF ALPINE SETTLEMENT. ROAD AND LOS TRANCOS ROAD, PORl'.OLA VALLEY. THEME.· EXPLORA TION/ SEmEMENT. ARMITAGE ORPHANAGE SITE. 20TH AVENUE AND ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS, SAN MATEO. THEME· SOCIAl/EDUCA TION. •MENLO PARK RAILROAD STATION. 1100 MERR ILL ST.,.,MENLO BRODERICK-TERRY BUILDING PLACE. SOUTH END OF ..1..6.._K!_ ~ THEME: ARCHITECTURE. ME RCW .JHEME: GOVERNMENT. MONTARA LIGHT STATION. MONTARA THEME.· ECONOMIC/ 1 BURLINGAME RAILROAD STATION. BURLINGAME AVE AND INDUSTRIAL. CALIFORNIA DRIVE, BURLINGAME. THEME.· ECONOMIC/ OFFERMAN, (JOHN) HOUSE. 1018 MAIN STREET, REDWOOD CITY. INDUSTRIAL. THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. CAMP FREMONT SITE. ('.ORNER OF SANTA CRUZ AVE. AND OLD SPANISH TRAIL. CREST OF COAL MINE RIDGE, THEME.· UNIVERSllY DR., MENLO PA§K. THEME: MILITARY. EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. CAROLANDS. S65 REMILLARD RD., HILLSBOROUGH. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. PARROTT GATE HOUSE. 87 CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD, SAN MATEO. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. •CASA DE TABLETA. 3195 ALPINE ROAD, PORTO'A vA! I FY. THEME.· ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. PIGEON POINT LI GHT STATION. PIGEON POINT. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. C HAPETE'S PLACE. ALPINE ROAD AND ARASTRADERO ROAD, THEME.· SOCIAL/EDUCATION. PILARCITOS CREEK BRIDGE. MAIN STREET. HALF MOON BAY. THEME: ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY. 210 OAK GROVE AVENUE, MENLO PARK. THEME: RELIGION. PILARCITOS DAM. PILARCITOS DAM, SAN FRANCISCO WATERSHED, THEME.· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. COLEMAN, (JAMES VALENTINE) HOME. PENINSULA WAY, MENLO - \IA! PARK. THEME: Al?CHITECTUl?E. - PORTOLA (VILLAGE ). PORTOLA ROAD, f9!IQ1 ¢ I fY· THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. • CRYSTAL SPRINGS DAM. JUNIPERO SERRA FREEWAY AT BLACK - PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. 0.7 MILE EAST OF HALFMOON BAY MOUNTAIN OVERLOOK, THEME.· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. ON OCEAN SHORE RD., THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. DISCOVERY O F (SITE ). SWEENY RIDGE. THEME.· EXPLOKA TION/ SETTLEMENT. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. 3.8 MILES SOUTH OF HALF MOON BAY ON OCEAN SHORE RD., THEME.· EXPLOIMTION/SETTLEMENT. DOUGLASS HALL MENLO SCHOOL AND COLLEGE, MENLO PARK. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. 8.8 MILES SOUTH OF PESCADERO ON OCEAN SHORE RD., THEME.- EXPLOKA TION/SETTLEMENT. •FILOLI ESTATE. CANADA ROAD SOUTH EN D OF CRYSTAL SPRINGS RESERVOIR, THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. SAN PEDRO VALLEY, PACIFICA. THEME: EXPLORA TION/SETTLEMENT. FLAG POLE. PESCADERO ROAD AND STAGE ROAD, PESCADERO. THEME.· SOCIAL/EDUCATION. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. 1.9 MILES NORTH OF MONTARA ON OCEAN SHORE ROAD, THEME.· EXPLOKA TION/ SETTLEMENT. GREEN OAKS RANCH. EAST OF CAB RILLO HIGHWAY, SOUTH OF PESCADERO, THEME: ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. OPPOSITE SAN GREGORIO RD. INTERSECTION, THEME.· EXPLOKA TION/SETTLEMENT. HIGHWAY SYSTEM (SITE OF INITIAL POINT). EL CAMINO REAL AT SAN MATEO DRIVE, SAN BRUNO. THEME.· GOVERNMENT. PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. SAN ANDREAS LAKE ON SKYLINE BLVD. , THEME.· EXPLOKA TION/SETTLEMENT. HILLSBOROUGH CONCRETE BRIDGE. CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD, ONE BLOCK WEST OF EL CAMI NO REAL, HILLSBOROUGH. THEME: PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. WOODSIDE. THEME.· EXPLORATION/ ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SETTLEMENT. HOSPICE (OUTPOST OF MISSION DOLORES). SOUTHWEST PORTOLA EXPEDITION CAMP. CRYSTAL SPRINGS LAKE, THEME.· .CORNER OF BA YWOOO AND EL CAMINO REAL, SAN MATEO. THEME.· EXPLORA TION/SETTlEMENT. EXPLOKA TION/SETTLEMENT. PORTOLA JOURNEYS END. NORTH OF SAN MA TEO-SANT A CLARA JEPSON LAUREL. NORTH END OF CRYSTAL SPR INGS LAKE, THEME.· COUNTY LINE, U.S. 82, THEME: EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. ARTS/LEISURE. •PORTOLA VALLEY SCHOOL. 775 PORTOLA RD., PO!HOI A Y6LLE.Y. " •JOHNSTON,(JAMES ) HOUSE. HIGGINS PURISIMA RD., HALF MOON THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. BAY. THEME: EXPWKATION/ SETTLEMENT. PULGAS WATER TEMPLE. CANADA ROAD, SOUTH ENO OF CRYSTAL LA HONDA STORE. LA HQN~ THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SPRINGS RESE RVOI R, REDWOOD CITY. THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. &an LATHAM GATE HOUSE. 439 RAVENSWOOD AVENUE, MENLO PMJ<. PURISIMA CEMETERY. 4 MILES SOUTH OF HO! F MOON BAY, EAST THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. OF VERDE ROAD, THEME.· REllGION.

262 San Mateo County (Continued)

PURISIMA TOWNSITE. VERDE ROAD, HALF MOON BAY. THEME: SANT A BARBARA COUNTY - 71 SITES (ALSO 1288 ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES)••

•RALSTON,(WILLIAM CHAPMAN ) HOUSE. COLLEG E OF NOTRE ALISAL ADOBE RANCH HEADQUARTERS. SANTA YNEZ VALLEY. DAME CAMPUS. BELMQl;:IT. THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. THEM£· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SAN ANDREAS DAM PLAQUE. SAN FRANCISCO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIA L. ARRELLANES CASA SITE. SANTA BARBARA. THEME.· EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. •SAN FRANCISCO BAY DISCOVERY SITE. 4 Ml. W. OF SAN BRUNO VIA SKYLINE DR. AND SNEATH LN., SAN BRUNO. THEME.· ARTESIA SCHOOL (LOMPOC UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT). EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. ARTESIA AVENUE AND CENTRAL AVENUE, LOMPOC. THEME· SOCIAL/EDUCATION. . SAN MATEO COUNTY'S FIRST SAWMILL SITE. 0.3 MILE SOUTH OF BALLARD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. SANTA YNEZ VALLEY, BALLARD. WPPJ;;JSJ.DLTHEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. THEME: RELIGION. SAN MATEO HOUSE SITE. CORNER OF 2ND AVENUE AND EL BALLARD SCHOOL. SANTA YNEZ VALLEY, BALLARD. THEME: CAMINO REAL, SAN MAJEO THEME· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SOCIAL/EDUCATION. SANCHEZ ADOBE. 13 MILES NORTH OF l:!ALF MOON BAY, THEME· MILITARY. BALLARD STAGE STATION. NORTH OF SOLVANG, SANTA YNEZ VALLEY AREA. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SEARSYILLE (SITE OF THE FORMER VILLAGE ). WOODSIDE. THEME· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. BIRABENT ADOBE. 820 SANTA BARBARA ST, SANTA BARBARA. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. SERRA, (JUNIPERO) MEMORIAL. ARAGON BLVD. AND EL CAMINO BURTON MOUND. BETWEEN NATOMA AVENUE AND WEST MASON REAL, ~ M AJ~· THEME· RELIGION. STREET, SANT A BARBARA. THEME· ABORIGINAL SHINE HOUSE. CANADA ROAD, WOODSIDE. THEME: CANEDA PRESIDIO ADOBE. 121 E. CANON PERDIDO, SANTA ARCHITECTURE. BARBARA. THEME· ARCHITECTURE SHIPYARD SITE OF SCHOONER 'REDWOOD' CONSTRUCTION. CARPI NTERIA AND INOIAN VILLAG E O F MISHOPSHNOW. CORNER OF BROADWAY AND JEFFERSON, R~gwoog QtY· THEME· ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. CARPINTERIA. THEME· ABORIGINAL. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD STATION. EL CAMINO REAL AND CARRILLO ADOBE. 11 E. CARRILLO ST., SANTA BARBARA. THEME· SAN CARLOS AVENUES, SAN CARLQS. THEME· ARCHITECTURE. ARCHITECTURE. COOK,(MORTIMER) VICTORIAN HOUSE. 1407 CHAPALA ST., SPANISH PANEL CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROADSIDE REST, JUN IPERO SANTA BARBARA. THEME.· ARCHITECTURE. SERRA FREEWAY AND SAN MATEO CREEK, SAN MAIW. THEME· SOCIAL/EDUCATION. CORDERO,(REFUGIO) ADOBES. 304 EAST CARILLO ST. AND 906 GARDEN ST., SANTA BARBARA. THEME· EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. ST. DENIS CHURCH AND CEMETERY. MENLO PARK. THEME· RELIGION. COVARRUBIAS ADOBE. 715 SANTA BARBARA STREET, SANTA BARBARA. THEME· ARCHITECTURE. · SUNSHINE COTTAGE (SAN MATEO COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL). 141 BOREL AVENU E, SA N MAifQ. THEME· ARCHITECTURE DE LA CUESTA,(EDUARDO) ADOBE. U.S. 101, ONE MILE FROM BUELLTON, THEME: ARCHITECTURE. TANFORAN RACE TRACK SITE. SAN RR! !NQ. THEME: ARTS/LEISURE OE LA GUERRA CASA. EL PASEO, SANTA BARBARA. THEME.· TEMPLETON-CROCKER HOME (UPLANDS). 400 UPLANDS DRIVE, MILITARY. SAN MATEO. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. OE LA GUERRA-ORENA ADOBE. LOS ALAMOS VICINITY. THEME.· TOBIN STATION-OCEAN SHORE RAILROAD STATION. PEDRO ARCHITECTURE. POINT, THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. EDSELL AND STRAHAN GROCERY. SANTA YNEZ VALLEY. THEME.· TUNITAS BEACH, INDIAN VILLAGE SITE ON PORTOLA ROUTE. B ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL MILES SOUTH Of ')ALF MOON BAY, THEME· ABORf.GINAL. ELIZALDE ADOBE. SIX MILES NW OF ORCUTI, BETIERAVIA. THEME· ARCHITECTURE. TWELVE-MILE HOUSE. 1076 OLD MISSION ROAD, soyTH s~ FjANCIS~. THEME· EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. FERNALD HOUSE. 412 W. MONTECITO STREET, SANTA BARBARA. UNION CEMETERY. WOODSIDE ROAD, REDWOOD Cl[" THEME· THEME· ARCHITECTURE. MILITARY. FOXEN ADOBE. FOXEN CANYON, DOS OLIVOS AREA. THEME.· UNION CEMETERY STATUE. WOODSIDE ROAD, RE DWOOD CITY. EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. THEME: MILITARY. ?:iia FREMONT'S TRAIL ACROSS MOUNTAINS. SAN MARCOS PASS AREA. THEME· MILITARY. WOODSIDE CONCRETE BRIDGE. MT. HOME ROAD, WOODSIDE. GAVIOTA PASS. 4 MILES N.E. OF GAVIOTA, THEME· EXPLORATION/ THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL • SETTLEMENT. WOODSIDE STORE. 1.5 MILES NORTHWEST OF WOOQS'P~ THEME: GLENDESSARY HOME. 2620 GLENDESSARY LANE, SANTA BARBARA. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. - THEME.· ARCHITECTURE.

263

APPENDIX B NAHC Search Results

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

Native American Heritage Commission 1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 916-373-3710 916-373-5471 – Fax [email protected]

Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search

Project: San Carlos Fuel Management______

County: San Mateo______

USGS Quadrangle Name: Woodside, CA______

Township: 5 South______Range: 4 West______Section(s): 14, 22, 23______

Company/Firm/Agency: Dudek______

Street Address: 1630 San Pablo Avenue______

City:Oakland______Zip: 94612______

Phone: 760-334-1156______

Fax:______

Email: [email protected]______

Project Description: The City of San Carlos is proposing clearing of underbrush and chaparral in four parks in the city to reduce the risk of high severity wildfires. These four parks include Eaton Park, Big Canyon Park, Crestview Park, and Highlands Park. Study Area 1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 2/27/2019 - Last saved by: mwatson - Path: Z:\Projects\j1171901\MAPDOC\Cultural\RS\Records_Search_Map.mxd - Path: mwatson by: saved Last - 2/27/2019 Date: SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series San Mateo & Woodside Quadrangles Township 5S; Range 4W; Sections 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27 021,000 ,000 Feet Records Search 0 250 500 Meters 1:24,000 San Carlos Fuel Management Project STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION Cultural and Environmental Department 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov

March 12, 2019

William Burns Dudek

VIA Email to: [email protected]

RE: San Carlos Fuel Management Project, City of San Carlos; Woodside USGS Quadrangle, San Mateo County, California.

Dear Mr. Burns:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Gayle Totton, Totton B.S., M.A., Ph.D. Associate Governmental Program Analyst

Attachment Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List San Mateo County 3/13/2019

Amah MutsunTribal Band Valentin Lopez, Chairperson P.O. Box 5272 Costanoan Galt, CA, 95632 Northern Valley Phone: (916) 743 - 5833 Yokut [email protected]

Amah MutsunTribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista Irenne Zwierlein, Chairperson 789 Canada Road Costanoan Woodside, CA, 94062 Phone: (650) 851 - 7489 Fax: (650) 332-1526 [email protected]

Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe Tony Cerda, Chairperson 244 E. 1st Street Costanoan Pomona, CA, 91766 Phone: (909) 629 - 6081 Fax: (909) 524-8041 [email protected]

Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson P.O. Box 28 Costanoan Hollister, CA, 95024 Phone: (831) 637 - 4238 [email protected]

Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area Charlene Nijmeh, Chairperson 20885 Redwood Road, Suite 232 Costanoan Castro Valley, CA, 94546 Phone: (408) 464 - 2892 [email protected]

The Ohlone Indian Tribe Andrew Galvan, P.O. Box 3388 Bay Miwok Fremont, CA, 94539 Ohlone Phone: (510) 882 - 0527 Patwin Fax: (510) 687-9393 Plains Miwok [email protected]

This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed San Carlos Fuel Management Project, San Mateo County.

PROJ-2019- 03/13/2019 09:00 AM 1 of 1 001681