Vegetation Management Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vegetation Management Guidelines County of San Mateo Environmental Services Agency Parks and Recreation Department Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management, San Mateo County Parks June 30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _______________________ 1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION _____________________________ 3 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED ___________________________________________________ 3 1.2 PROJECT GOALS _______________________________________________________ 3 1.3 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES _____________________________ 4 1.4 DOCUMENTS AND STUDIES REVIEWED FOR THIS DOCUMENT__________ 7 1.5 PARTICIPANTS AND STAKEHOLDERS ___________________________________ 7 CHAPTER 2. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT CONTEXT _____ 10 2.1 PARK USAGE__________________________________________________________ 10 2.2 CURRENT MAINTENANCE ISSUES AND CONCERNS ____________________ 10 2.3 RELEVANT PLANS AND POLICIES _____________________________________ 15 CHAPTER 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS _____________________ 24 3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY PARKS SYSTEM ______________ 24 3.2 CRYSTAL SPRINGS REGIONAL TRAIL __________________________________ 24 3.3 COYOTE POINT RECREATION AREA___________________________________ 28 3.4 EDGEWOOD PARK AND PRESERVE ____________________________________ 31 3.5 FITZGERALD MARINE RESERVE_______________________________________ 35 3.6 FLOOD PARK__________________________________________________________ 39 3.7 HUDDART PARK ______________________________________________________ 42 3.8 JUNIPERO SERRA PARK _______________________________________________ 46 3.9 MEMORIAL ___________________________________________________________ 50 3.10 MIRADA SURF EAST AND WEST _______________________________________ 53 3.11 PESCADERO PARK ____________________________________________________ 56 3.12 SAM MCDONALD _____________________________________________________ 59 3.13 SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN _____________________________________________ 63 3.14 SAN PEDRO VALLEY__________________________________________________ 72 3.15 SANCHEZ ADOBE ____________________________________________________ 76 3.16 WOODSIDE STORE ___________________________________________________ 78 3.17 WUNDERLICH _______________________________________________________ 78 Page i Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. CHAPTER 4. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION __________________ 83 4.1 LIST OF PLANNED AND ACTIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECTS AND ACTIONS ___________________________________________________________ 83 4.2 SUGGESTED METHODS FOR PRIORITIZING AND RANKING VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECTS________________________________________________ 91 4.3 SELECTING PRIORITY PROJECTS ______________________________________ 94 CHAPTER 5. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES AND APPROACHES ______________________________________ 97 5.1 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT_____________________________________________ 99 5.2 WATERSHED PROTECTION MAINTENANCE STANDARDS / NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL_________________________________________ 100 5.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL_________________________________ 101 5.4 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY________________________________________ 103 5.5 FOREST HEALTH ____________________________________________________ 104 5.6 FUEL LOAD AND FIRE MANAGEMENT________________________________ 107 5.7 MOWING ____________________________________________________________ 112 5.8 SENSITIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT _______________________________ 118 5.9 RECYCLING GREEN WASTE AND VEGETATION BIOMASS______________ 126 5.10 UNAUTHORIZED TRAILS ____________________________________________ 128 5.11 HABITAT RESTORATION ____________________________________________ 129 5.12 INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL _________________________________________ 131 5.13 PLANT PEST AND DISEASE DETECTION AND CONTROL______________ 141 5.14 SHORELINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT __________________________ 144 5.15 VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES, PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT______________ 145 5.16 GRAZING PROGRAMS FOR WILDLAND SETTINGS_____________________ 147 5.17 PROJECT MONITORING _____________________________________________ 149 CHAPTER 6. SUMMARY OF LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE NEEDS _________________________________________________ 150 6.1 STEWARDSHIP OF HABITAT RESTORATION AREAS____________________ 150 6.2 TRAIL MAINTENANCE, UNAUTHORIZED TRAIL REMOVAL, AND HUMAN USE ____________________________________________________________________ 150 6.3 FOREST HEALTH MAINTENANCE AND FIRE CONTROL MANAGEMENT 151 6.4 INVASIVE PLANT MAINTENANCE ____________________________________ 152 6.5 GRAZING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT__________________________________ 152 Page ii Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. CHAPER 7 REFERENCES ________________________________ 153 7.1 PRINTED REFERENCES ______________________________________________ 153 7.2 PERSONAL COMMUNICATION _______________________________________ 155 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES APPENDIX B. FORMS APPENDIX C. EDUCATIONAL PAMPHLETS AND BROCHURES APPENDIX D. HELPFUL RESOURCES APPENDIX E. EXTENDED BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX F. MAP Page iii Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. This report was funded through a generous grant from the San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Foundation. This report was prepared by: May & Associates, Inc. 730 Clementina Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 391-1000 www.mayandassociatesinc.com Page iv Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. Chapter 0 Executive Summary CHAPTER 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Division of the Environmental Services Agency (County) is seeking to improve its efforts to organize, prioritize, schedule, and efficiently implement vegetation management projects throughout the County Parks System. This document is intended to help San Mateo County Park staff in making informed decisions about future vegetation management priorities and actions. This report is not a plan of action, but simply a series of guidelines to help guide future decisions about vegetation management. In addition, this document is intended to provide user-friendly “how to” advice to park rangers, volunteers, and others to help select vegetation management actions that are more efficient and effective. The County Park staff will need to conduct the following actions in order to prioritize future projects and move forward to implementation: 1) Finalize the list of projects presented in Section 4.1 (update regularly as more projects are added). 2) Prioritize the list of Projects by numerically scoring, then comparing the projects using the methods and selection scoring criteria presented in Section 4.2 and 4.3. 3) Once the top priority projects are selected, seek funding, staff time, and volunteer support necessary to implement the projects. 4) Use the procedures presented in this report to guide implementation in order to ensure effectiveness and standardization of results. 5) Repeat project prioritization regularly, typically every year or 5 years and update the list of priority projects as needed. This report is organized as follows: • Chapter 1 Presents the Purpose and Need for the Document, and establishes overall goals and objectives for vegetation management in the San Mateo Parks system. It also details the participants and stakeholders who participated in the development of this document. • Chapter 2 Presents the Vegetation Management Context, including a description of parks users and user priorities; a review of what the current park vegetation management practices are; a description from park staff of what they believe are the issues and concerns; and a regulatory framework for park projects. • Chapter 3 Describes the Existing Conditions at each Park, including a general park overview of park resources (Rana 2002); a list of park-specific goals, policies, and management objectives (derived from a variety of existing planning documents); and a summary of current and ongoing activities (provided by oral interviews with park staff). • Chapter 4 Lists All Park Projects, including those that are planned, or underway, and provides a method for assessing, prioritizing, and ranking park projects. Page 1 Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. Chapter 0 Executive Summary • Chapter 5 Provides Details on Vegetation Management Techniques, organized by subject matter, and ties the vegetation management actions back to the goals and objectives presented in Chapter 1. • Chapter 6 Describes Long-Term Maintenance Needs for the entire park system. • Chapter 7 Provides References, both written and personal communications, used in development of this document. These chapters are supported by information presented in the Appendices, including: • Appendix A. Technical “How To” Information on Vegetation Management Techniques; • Appendix B. Forms (provides reproducible standard forms for office and field use); • Appendix C. Informational Brochures and Handouts; • Appendix D. List of Helpful Resources to contact for more information; • Appendix E. Expanded Bibliography intended to expedite finding information in original source documents; and • Appendix F. Relevant Project Maps. Page 2 Final Decision-Making Guidelines for Vegetation Management June 2006 San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Dept. Chapter 1 Introduction CHAPTER
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Sam Mcdonald Pescadero
    Topher Simon Topher permitted in trail camps. trail in permitted water is available at trail camps. Backpack stoves are are stoves Backpack camps. trail at available is water who register with the ranger at Memorial Park. No No Park. Memorial at ranger the with register who snakes, and banana slugs. banana and snakes, available for a fee on a drop-in basis for backpackers backpackers for basis drop-in a on fee a for available woodpeckers, Steller’s jays, garter snakes, gopher gopher snakes, garter jays, Steller’s woodpeckers, hikes passing through multiple parks. multiple through passing hikes Trail camps camps Trail at Shaw Flat and Tarwater Flat are are Flat Tarwater and Flat Shaw at tailed deer, raccoons, opossums, foxes, bobcats, bobcats, foxes, opossums, raccoons, deer, tailed State Park, offering the opportunity for several long long several for opportunity the offering Park, State Common wildlife in Sam McDonald includes black- includes McDonald Sam in wildlife Common Trailheads. The trail network also connects to Big Basin Redwoods Redwoods Basin Big to connects also network trail The State Park, and at the Old Haul Road and Tarwater Tarwater and Road Haul Old the at and Park, State leaf maple, and oak trees. oak and maple, leaf a number of trails with Portola Redwoods State Park Park State Redwoods Portola with trails of number a Ranger Station, Portola Trailhead, Portola Redwoods Redwoods Portola Trailhead, Portola Station, Ranger Douglas fir, madrone, California laurel, buckeye, big big buckeye, laurel, California madrone, fir, Douglas Pescadero Creek Park shares its eastern boundary and and boundary eastern its shares Park Creek Pescadero inter-park trail network trail inter-park from the Sam McDonald McDonald Sam the from The forests, dominated by coast redwood, also include include also redwood, coast by dominated forests, The rugged beauty offers a true escape.
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfsan Mateo County Parks Brochure
    November 2018 November paper recycled on Printed C Topher Simon Topher docent and ranger programs. programs. ranger and docent Wild places & friendly spaces spaces friendly & places Wild Wild places & friendly spaces friendly & places Wild County’s two historic sites, on nature trails, and through through and trails, nature on sites, historic two County’s San Mateo County Parks County Mateo San Visitors of all ages can learn learn can ages all of Visitors in our Visitor Centers, at the the at Centers, Visitor our in Explore & Learn & Explore Justin Knowles at www.SMCoParks.org or by calling 650-363-4021. calling by or www.SMCoParks.org at Wunderlich Campsites can also be reserved. You can make reservations reservations make can You reserved. be also can reservable sites reservable for picnic groups larger than 20. 20. than larger groups picnic for have also Woodside Store Woodside community. For information, visit www.SupportParks.org. visit information, For community. Drop-in picnic sites picnic Drop-in are available in most parks. Many parks parks Many parks. most in available are Tunitas Creek Beach Creek Tunitas funds to improve the quality of County Parks for our our for Parks County of quality the improve to funds Picnic & Camp & Picnic Foundation Parks County Mateo San The raises raises Sanchez Adobe Sanchez San Pedro Valley Pedro San improve parklands and serve park visitors. visitors. park serve and parklands improve volunteer can You to help rangers protect and and protect rangers help to Erin Proudfoot Mountain Bruno San Support your parks your Support Sam McDonald Sam Quarry unlimited entrances to all County Parks for a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2015: Chinese Americans in San Mateo County
    Summer 2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 2 Chinese Americans in San Mateo County Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. The Chinese in San Mateo County: An Introduction ......................................... 3 by Albert A. Acena, Ph.D. Our Mission Shrimp Camps of San Mateo County .............................................................. 6 To inspire wonder and by Mitchell P. Postel discovery of the cultural Ah Sam .............................................................................................................. 14 and natural history of San by Nellie Leong Mateo County. The Cases of Sing Sheng and Robert U.M. Ting .............................................. 22 by Mitchell P. Postel Accredited by the American Alliance of Museums. The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Chonita E. Cleary; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Tania Gaspar; Mark Jamison; Wally Jansen; Peggy Bort Jones; The San Mateo County Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Historical Association Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John operates the San Mateo Shroyer; Bill Stronck; Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. County History Museum and Archives at the old San President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, Mateo County Courthouse Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. located in Redwood City, California, and administers Leadership Council two county historical sites, John C.
    [Show full text]
  • OSU Gardening with Oregon Native Plants
    GARDENING WITH OREGON NATIVE PLANTS WEST OF THE CASCADES EC 1577 • Reprinted March 2008 CONTENTS Benefi ts of growing native plants .......................................................................................................................1 Plant selection ....................................................................................................................................................2 Establishment and care ......................................................................................................................................3 Plant combinations ............................................................................................................................................5 Resources ............................................................................................................................................................5 Recommended native plants for home gardens in western Oregon .................................................................8 Trees ...........................................................................................................................................................9 Shrubs ......................................................................................................................................................12 Groundcovers ...........................................................................................................................................19 Herbaceous perennials and ferns ............................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Problems of the 1920S & 1930S, Bay Meadows
    Winter 2011 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xl, No. 2 Law Enforcement Problems of the 1920s & 1930s, Bay Meadows Remembered and Daly City Centennial Table of Contents The Most Corrupt County: The Era of Prohibition and Gambling ................................................................ 3 by Carmen J. Blair Bay Meadows Remembered ............................................................................. 14 by Jon Rubin Daly City-Colma: Leaves of History .................................................................. 21 by Samuel C. Chandler The San Mateo County Historical Association operates the San Mateo County History Museum and research archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse located in Our Vision Redwood City, California, and administers two county historical sites, the Sanchez To discover the past Adobe in Pacifica and the Woodside Store in Woodside. and imagine the future. The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors Our Mission Peggy Bort Jones, Chairwoman; Keith Bautista, Immediate Past Chairman; Patrick Ryan, To enrich, excite and Vice Chairman; Phill Raiser, Secretary; Brian Sullivan, Treasurer; Alpio Barbara; Paul educate through Barulich; Roberta Carcione; Herm Christensen; Shawn DeLuna; Ted Everett; Umang understanding, Gupta; John Inglis; Wally Jansen; Doug Keyston; Les Koonce; Karen S. McCown; Tom preserving and McGraw; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Anne Peter; Cynthia L. Schreurs; Paul Shepherd and interpreting the history Mitchell P. Postel, President. of San Mateo County. President’s Advisory Board Accredited by the Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; Frank Baldanzi; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; American Association T. Jack Foster, Jr.; Georgi LaBerge; Greg Munks; John Schrup and Tom Siebel. of Museums La Peninsula Carmen J. Blair, Managing Editor Publications Committee: Joan M. Levy, Publications Chairwoman; Albert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Coastal Scrub and Coastal Prairie
    GRBQ203-2845G-C07[180-207].qxd 12/02/2007 05:01 PM Page 180 Techbooks[PPG-Quark] SEVEN Northern Coastal Scrub and Coastal Prairie LAWRENCE D. FORD AND GREY F. HAYES INTRODUCTION prairies, as shrubs invade grasslands in the absence of graz- ing and fire. Because of the rarity of these habitats, we are NORTHERN COASTAL SCRUB seeing increasing recognition and regulation of them and of Classification and Locations the numerous sensitive species reliant on their resources. Northern Coastal Bluff Scrub In this chapter, we describe historic and current views on California Sagebrush Scrub habitat classification and ecological dynamics of these ecosys- Coyote Brush Scrub tems. As California’s vegetation ecologists shift to a more Other Scrub Types quantitative system of nomenclature, we suggest how the Composition many different associations of dominant species that make up Landscape Dynamics each of these systems relate to older classifications. We also Paleohistoric and Historic Landscapes propose a geographical distribution of northern coastal scrub Modern Landscapes and coastal prairie, and present information about their pale- Fire Ecology ohistoric origins and landscapes. A central concern for describ- Grazers ing and understanding these ecosystems is to inform better Succession stewardship and conservation. And so, we offer some conclu- sions about the current priorities for conservation, informa- COASTAL PRAIRIE tion about restoration, and suggestions for future research. Classification and Locations California Annual Grassland Northern Coastal Scrub California Oatgrass Moist Native Perennial Grassland Classification and Locations Endemics, Near-Endemics, and Species of Concern Conservation and Restoration Issues Among the many California shrub vegetation types, “coastal scrub” is appreciated for its delightful fragrances AREAS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH and intricate blooms that characterize the coastal experi- ence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
    SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT APPENDIX TO THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN (HAZARD + RISK = VULNERABILITY) San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Homeland Security Division Office of Emergency Services J A N U A R Y 2 , 2 0 1 5 SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT County of San Mateo Sheriff’s Office Homeland Security Division Office of EmergencyServices 400 County Center Redwood City, CA 94063 650-363-4955 www.smcsheriff.com i 01/02/2015 SAN MATEO COUNTY HAZARD VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL ............................................................................................................................. 1 SAN MATEO COUNTY PROFILE ................................................................................................ 3 HAZARD 1: DAM FAILURE ...................................................................................................... 5 HAZARD 2: DROUGHT ......................................................................................................... 11 HAZARD 3: EARTHQUAKES ................................................................................................... 15 HAZARD 4: EXTREME HEAT .................................................................................................. 23 HAZARD 5: FLOODING ......................................................................................................... 25 HAZARD 6: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]