DOCSLIB.ORG

Münzen Der Antike

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Münzen Der Antike 4 Münzen der Antike GRIECHISCHE MÜNZEN 1 Syrakus/Sizilien, Hieron II. 275-215 v.Chr. AE 22 mm Kopf des Poseidon n.l./ Ornamentaler Dreizack zwischen zwei Delphinen BMC 2.603 ..................................................................................................................................f.ss 36,- 2 Makedonien/Königreich, Alexander III. der Große 336 - 323 v. Chr. Tetradrachme 16,61 Gramm Kopf des Herakles im Löwenskalp n.r./ Zeus thront n.l., hält Zepter und Adler auf der ausgestreckten Rechten...................f.ss 140,- 3 LOT von 19 Bronzen (11 bis 24 mm) d.makedonischen Königreiches (Alex. III.; Cassander; Demetrios I.; Interregnum; Ant.Gonatas; Demetrios II.; Philipp V. und röm.Kaiserreich) dazu eine Bronze Amphipolis LOT 20 Stück............Ø ss 60,- 4 Thrakien, LOT von 16 Bronzen (10 bis 21 mm) der Städte Abdera; Byzantium; Cherronesos und Lysimacheia; dazu eine Silber-Hemidrachme von Byzantium LOT 17 Stück .............................................................. schön bis schön-ss 40,- 5 Athen/Attica, Tetradrachme nach 449 v.Chr. 16,45 Gramm Kopf der Athena mit Ölzweig am attischen Helm n.r./ Eule steht rechts, dahinter Mondsichel und Ölzweig...................................................................... Rs.Einhieb; schön 70,- 6 Dyrrhachion/Illyrien, Drachme 229-100 v.Chr. Kuh steht rechts darunter Kalb, oben Magistratsname "Meniskos"/ Florales Muster in Linienquadrat ....................................................................................................................schön-ss 24,- 7 Pontus, LOT von 17 Bronzen (9 bis 33 mm) Amisos(4); Trapezus(1); Amasia(1); Sinope(2); Kolchis/Dioskurias(1); Kreta(6); Melos(1) und Delos(1) .......................................................................................................................... Ø schön 34,- 8 Bithynien, LOT von 14 Bronzen (14 bis 24 mm).............................................................................................. Ø schön 26,- 9 Milet/Ionien, LOT von 4 Diobolen (478-390 v.Chr.) Vorderteil eines Löwen/ Ornam.Stern; dazu eine makedonische Hemidrachme Herakleskopf rechts/ Sitz.Zeus 1,27 Gramm LOT 5 Stück .........................................schön bis ss 30,- 10 Pisidien, LOT von 16 Bronzen (19 bis 26 mm) der Münzstätten Ariassos(1) und Antiochia(15) schön bis schön-ss 40,- 11 -- LOT von 13 Bronzen (11 bis 23 mm) der Münzstätten: Cremna (2); Etenna (3); Selge (7) und Amyntas/Galatia (1) .......................................................................................................................................................................meist schön 30,- 12 Kilikien, LOT von 10 Bronzen (20 bis 26 mm) der Münzstätten: Antiochia ad Cragum; Flaviopolis; Irenopolis; Mallus; Mopsus; Ninica und Seleuceia ad Calycadnum ...................................................................................................... schön 30,- 13 -- LOT von 6 Bronzen (15 bis 34 mm) der MünzstätteTarsos........................................................................... Ø schön 30,- 14 Römische Kaiserzeit, LOT von 8 Bronzen (17 bis 29 mm) der Münzstätte Anazarbos.............. schön bis schön-ss 36,- 15 Syrien/Königreich, LOT von 20 Bronzen (12 bis 28 mm) 3.-2.Jahrhundert v.Chr. ....................schön und schön-ss 80,- 16 Parthia, Phraates IV. 38 - 2 v.Chr. Tetradrachme 11,13 Gramm Diad.Büste des Königs mit kurzem Bart n.l./ König thront n.r. und vor ihm stehende Athena hält ihm Diadem entgegen Sear 7469 Mitch.585......................ss 100,- 119.AUKTION Münzen der Antike 5 17 - LOT von 7 Drachmen 1.Jahrhdt. v.Chr. - 1.Jahrhdt.n.Chr. meist ss dazu eine indoscytische Drachme des Azes II. ss LOT 8 Stück.................................................................................................................................................................... 70,- 18 Ägypten, Kgr. Ptolemaios III. und VI. LOT von 3 Bronzen (21 bis 30 mm) Zeuskopf/ Steh.Adler n.l............ schön 20,- 19 - LOT von 7 AE-Tetradrachmen der Münzstätte Alexandria der römischen Kaiser Aurelian; Carinus; Maximian und Diocletian................................................................................................................................................................Ø ss 50,- L O T S L O T S L O T S 20 LOT von 30 Bronzen (9 bis 24 mm) von Münzstätten in Moesia; Caria; Ionia; Troas; Mysia; Lydia.............meist schön 30,- 21 LOT von 17 div.Kleinasiatischen Bronzen Lydia: Germe(1); Sardes(3); Saitta(1); Thyatira(1); Phrygia: Apameia(1); Ariassos(2); Kibyra(2); Kotiaeon(1); Laodiceia(2); Pamphylia: Perga(3) ....................................................... Ø schön-ss 50,- 22 LOT von 4 Bronzen (20 bis 28 mm) und eine Drachme des Kaisers Hadrian der Mzst.Caesarea in Cappadocia schön 20,- 23 LOT von 22 Bronzen (11 bis 34 mm) und 2 Silbermünzen (Kreuzfahrer Antiochia und Silber Tetradrachme Antiochia) LOT 24 Stück ...............................................................................................................................................................sge 20,- 24 LOT von 16 Bronzen (13 bis 27 mm) der röm.Kaiserzeit Mzst.Antiochia/Or.(13); Cyrros(1); Seleuceia Pieriae(1) und Laodiceia/Mare(1)...............................................................................................................................................schön-ss 40,- 25 LOT von 18 Bronzen (14 bis 27 mm) der römischen Kaiserzeit geprägt in Mesopotannia (Carrhae; Edessa; Nisibis; Rhesaena und Singara).................................................................................................................................meist schön 50,- 26 LOT von 4 Bronzen (14 bis 20 mm) aus Baktria, Elymais; Nabathaea und Ceylon................................................ schön 20,- R Ö M I S C H E R E P U B L I K 27 Q.MARCIUS LIBO 148 v.Chr. As Rom Januskopf dahinter I / Prora n.r. Syd.396 Crawf.215/2a BMC 702 ss 40,- 28 Julius Caesar geb.100 v.Chr. - gest. 44 v.Chr. Denar 44 v.Chr. CAESAR DICT PERPETUO Belorbeerte und verschleierter Kopf Caesars n.r./ Venus steht links und hält Viktoriola und Zepter über Schild Mm. P.SEPULIUS MACER Coh.39 BMC 4173 ...................................................................................................................................f.ss 190,- 29 LOT von 7 Bronzemünzen 19 bis 22 mm (Quadrans; Triens und Semiuncia)...................................................schön-ss 50,- RÖMISCHES KAISERREICH 30 Augustus 27 v.Chr. – 14 n.Chr. Denar Lugdunum 2 v.Chr. - 4 n.Chr. Belorb.Büste n.r./ Caius und Lucius Caesares stehen mit Schild und Lanze nebeneinander v.v. Coh.43 RIC 350 .........................................................schön-ss 60,- 31 - AE 20 mm der Münzstätte Philippi/Mazedonien Viktoria n.l. zwischen VIC-AVG/ COHOR.PRAE.PHIL 3 Standarten ....................................................................................................................................................................................ss 30,- 32 Tiberius 14 - 37 Denar Lugdunum Belorb.Büste des Tiberius nach rechts/ Weibl.Gestalt (Livia ?) mit Zweig und Zepter nach rechts sitzend RIC 30 Coh.16........................................................................................................ss+ 100,- 33 Vespasian 69 - 79 Denar Büste n.l./ IOVIS CVSTVS Nackter Jupiter steht frontal mit Zepter und Patera, vor ihm kleiner Altar Coh.223 RIC 124b...........................................................................................................................ss 60,- 119.AUKTION 6 Münzen der Antike 34 Nerva 96 - 98 Denar 97 n.Chr. Belorb.Büste nach rechts/ FORTVNA AVGVST Fortuna steht links, hält Ruder und Füllhorn Coh.66 RIC 16................................................................................................................................ss 44,- 35 - As Belorb.Büste n.r./ FORTVNA AVGVST - SC Fortuna steht links mit Ruder und Füllhorn Coh.66 RIC 16 ss 50,- 36 Trajan 98 - 117 Denar 103 – 111 n.Chr. Diad.Büste nach rechts/ COS V PP SPQR OPTIMO PRINC Trophäe Coh.98 RIC 147.......................................................................................................................................................ss 35,- 37 - AE Drachme Jahr 14 der Münzstätte Alexandria/Ägypten Kaiserbüste n.r./ Elefantenquadriga n.r. ............schön-ss 40,- 38 Hadrian 117-138 Denar Belorb. Büste n.r./ PM TRP COS III Providentia v.v. stehend zwischen PRO - AVG mit ausgestreckter Rechten und Zepter, zu Füßen Globus Coh.1198 RIC 133........................................................ss 35,- 39 Antoninus Pius 138-161 AE Diobol Jahr 8 Mzst. Alexandria Belorb. Büste des Kaisers n. r./ Agathodaimon Schlange ringelt n.r. Datt.3069 ................................................................................................................................ss 20,- 40 - Denar posthum unter Marc Aurel Büste n.r./ DIVO PIO Antoninus sitzt n.l. und hält Zweig und Zepter Coh.352 RIC M 442...........................................................................................................................................................ss+/ss 50,- 41 - Dupondius TRP XII = 159 n.Chr. Büste mit Strahlenkrone nach rechts/ COS IIII - SC Kaiser steht auf Podest in einem 2-Säulen-Tempel Coh.338 RIC 931..........................................................................................................ss 40,- 42 Marcus Aurelius 161 - 180 Denar Steh.Providentia Coh.516............................................................................ss 26,- 43 - Denar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • İkinci Sofistik Dönem: Sofist, Retor Ve Filozofların Dini Görevleri 219
    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 217-239 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201711 İKİNCİ SOFİSTİK DÖNEM: SOFİST, RETOR VE FİLOZOFLARIN DİNİ GÖREVLERİ THE SECOND SOPHISTIC: RELIGIOUS OFFICIALS OF SOPHISTS, RHETORS, AND PHILOSOPHERS ∗ ELİF AKGÜN KAYA Öz: Edebi kaynaklar, epigrafik belgeler ve nümismatik Abstract: Literary sources, epigraphical documents, veriler İkinci Sofistik Dönem’de (MS I-III. yüzyıl) sofist, and numismatic evidence show that the sophists, rhe- retor ve filozofların mensubu oldukları aile ve aldıkları tors, and philosophers that belonged to the most pro- eğitim sonucunda, kamusal yükümlülükleri ait olduk- minent and the wealthiest families had an excellent ları toplumsal sınıf içinde dikkat çekici şekilde başarıyla education and so they officiated successfully many yerine getirdiklerini ve sahip oldukları parayı cömertçe public services and generously spent their money for kentleri için harcadıklarını göstermektedir. Bu kişiler the cities in the Second Sophistic Period (Ist to IIIrd cen- βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, στρατηγός, ἀρχιε- turies AD). They undertook important municipal ma- ρεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, νεωκόρος, νεοποι- gistracies such as βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, ός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανόμος, λογιστής ve τα- στρατηγός, ἀρχιερεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, μίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρ- νεωκόρος, νεοποιός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανό- χος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης μος, λογιστής ve ταμίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, gibi önemli kent görevlerini üstlenmişlerdir. Ayrıca ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρχος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, eyalet düzeyinde ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης ve πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης. Also, it is documented that γαλατάρχης’lik gibi oldukça prestijli kamusal görevleri they took on quite prestigious provincial magistracies üstlendikleri de belgelenmektedir. Bu makalede ise İkin- such as ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης, and γαλα- ci Sofistik Dönem’de sofist, retor ve filozofların kent- τάρχης.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REACH of the ROMAN EMPIRE in ROUGH CILICIA by HUGHW.ELTON
    THE ECONOMIC FRINGE: THE REACH OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE IN ROUGH CILICIA By HUGHW.ELTON Many discussions of the Roman economy are rather vague about what they mean by 'Roman'. Phrases such as 'Roman Europe' or 'the Roman Empire' often blur two different concepts, that of the cultures of Iron Age Europe and the political institution of the Roman Empire. Cultures in Iron Age Europe varied widely. The Welsh uplands or the Atlas mountains, for example, had an aceramic culture with few public buildings, though were mIed directly by Rome for several centuries. Other regions, not under Roman control, like the regions across the middle Danube, showed higher concentrations of Mediterranean consumer goods and coins than some of these aceramic areas. 1 In Mesopotamia, many societies were urban and literate, not differing in this respect from those in Italy or Greece. Thus, determining what was imperial Roman territory by archaeological criteria alone is very difficult? But these archaeological criteria are important for two reasons. First, they allow us to analyse the cultural and economic changes that occurred in Iron Age Europe between 100 B.C. and A.D. 250. Second, they allow for the possibility of change within Europe that was not caused by the Roman state? Unlike cultures within Iron Age Europe, the Roman Empire was a political structure, imposed by force and dedicated to extracting benefits for the mling elite of the city of Rome.4 As the empire developed and matured, its form changed, but it was never about the mIed, only the rulers. If we accept that the Empire was a political, not an archaeological, structure, it follows that an examination of 'Impact of Empire: Transformation of Economic Life', has to mean an examination of the impact of the Roman imperial state.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago the Spaces Between the Teeth
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME ONE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE SPACES BETWEEN THE TEETH: ENVIRONMENT, SETTLEMENT, AND INTERACTION ON THE ISLAMIC-BYZANTINE FRONTIER VOLUME TWO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY A. ASA EGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ xiii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ xvi ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Studies JANUARY, 1914 DOCUMENTS CANONS ATTRIBUTED to the COUNCIL of CON­
    The journal of Theological Studies JANUARY, 1914 DOCUMENTS CANONS ATTRIBUTED TO THE COUNCIL OF CON­ . STANTINOPLE, A.D. 381, TOGETHER WITH THE NAMES OF THE BISHOPS, FROM TWO PATMOS MSS POB' POr'. IN the year 1898 I was enabled, through the good offices of my colleague Mr D. G. Hogarth, at that time Director of the British School at Athens, to obtain a transcript of a good deal of the matter contained in two MSS at Patmos, POB' and POi''-sister MSS, each of them written somewhere about A.D. Soo-which are our oldest witnesses to the text of the Greek Canon Law. So far as I know, they have never been employed by any editor; and I myself had only made occasional use of my transcript, as a check on the printed texts, when I wanted to know what was the Greek original underlying any particular passage of the Latin versions of the councils. It was only when I had it in my mind to propose to the Clarendon Press the publication of a manual edition of the early Greek canons (that is, of the fourth and fifth centuries) that I examined my material more closely. The most obvious difference between Greek and Latin MSS of Canons, taken in the mass, is the striking resemblance of the former among themselves contrasted with the almost in{inite degrees of divergence from one another which prevail in the latter. The contents of Greek canonical MSS are always more or less the same : the greater surprise was it to find in the Patmos MSS a series of canons attributed to the Council of Constantinople (A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 40. Uluslararası Kazı, Araştırma Ve Arkeometri Sempozyumu Programı
    T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TUR İZM BAKANLI ĞI Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlü ğü 40. Uluslararası Kazı, Ara ştırma ve Arkeometri Sempozyumu 07-11 Mayıs 2018 Troya Kültür Merkezi-Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi ÇANAKKALE Troya Kültür 07 Mayıs 2018 08 Mayıs 2018 09 Mayıs 2018 10 Mayıs 2018 11 Mayıs 2018 12 Mayıs 2018 Pazartesi Salı Çar şamba Per şembe Cuma Cumartesi Merkezi Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Prof. Dr. Sevim Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Buluç Salonu 11:00-12:00 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:25 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-18:00 Seminer Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Toplantısı Salonu 2 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:25 09:00-12:25 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-15:00 Çanakkale Ara ştırma Ara ştırma Ara ştırma Kazı Sonuçları Ara ştırma Gezisi Seminer Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Salonu 3 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:25 10:00-12:00 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:30 14:00-18:30 14:00-17:35 14:00-16:50 Ara ştırma Ara ştırma Arkeometri Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı Ara ştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı Seminer Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı 10:00-12:20 Sonuçları Toplantısı 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 09:00-12:05 Arkeometri 14:00-17:05 Salonu 4 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 Sonuçları Toplantısı 14:00-18:15 Arkeometri Arkeometri Ara ştırma Arkeometri Seminer Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Sonuçları Toplantısı Salonu 5 09:00-12:45 10:00-12:00 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-16:50 07 MAYIS 2018 PAZARTES İ KAZI SONUÇLARI TOPLANTISI PROF.
    [Show full text]
  • Soğmatar Çevresi Kaya Mezarlari Rock Tombs
    Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi Volume:43, p. 255-261 ISSN: 1308-6200 DOI Number: 10.17498/kdeniz.573479 Research Article Received: June 02, 2019 Accepted: June 10, 2019 This article was checked by intihal.net. SOĞMATAR ÇEVRESİ KAYA MEZARLARI ROCK TOMBS AROUND SOĞMATAR СКАЛЬНЫЕ КЛАДБИЩА В ОКРЕСТНОСТЯХ СОГМАТАРА Yusuf ALBAYRAK - Bahattin ÇELİK ÖZ Şanlıurfa İli’nin 40 km. doğusunda ve güneydoğusunda yer alan Tek Tek dağları, Harran Ovasının doğu bölümünü sınırlayan kuzey-güney yönünde kalker platolardan oluşan bir tepeler silsilesidir. Tektek Dağları üzerinde Paleolitik dönemden itibaren pek çok iskân söz konusu olmuştur. Bu merkezlerden en önemlisi Soğmatar Antik şehri, Roma döneminde kutsal bir alan olması yanında bir nekropol alanı olarak da dikkat çekmektedir. Soğmatar Antik Şehri nekropolünde sayıları 72 olan kaya mezarları ilk olarak Erken Tunç Çağı’nda kireçtaşından ana kaya oyularak yapılmış ve Roma döneminde tekrar kullanım görmüştür.. Bu denli önemli bir merkezin çevresine etkisini ortaya koyabilmek için Soğmatar’ın yakın çevresinde yer alan kırsal alanlarda yüzey araştırmaları yapılmış ve köylerin çoğunda kaya mezarları tespit edilmiştir. Tespit edilen bu kaya mezarları genellikle dromoslu ve tek odalıdır. Kimi mezarlarda dromoslar merdivenli, kimi mezarlarda ise düz olarak yapılmıştır. Bu mezarların tümü mimari özellik ve plan olarak Soğmatar’daki Roma dönemi kaya mezarları ile bire bir benzerlik göstermektedir. Ayrıca, Soğmatar’da yer alan Silindir Planlı Anıt mezarların benzerleri de tespit edilmiştir. Soğmatar’daki Silindir Planlı Anıt mezarlar gibi kaya mezarının üstüne çapı 5-7 m arasında değişen yuvarlar planlı yapılar yapılmıştır. Bazen bu yapıların içine de mezar yerleştirilmiş olmakla birlikte çoğunlukla yuvarlak planlı yapıların altında bulunan kireçtaşı kayalar oyularak kaya mezarları yapılmaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Gambill 1 Clara Gambill HIST 396/IS 392 Professor Tim Howe 29
    Gambill 1 Clara Gambill HIST 396/IS 392 Professor Tim Howe 29 January, 2020 Exploring Domestic Space in Rough Cilicia Abstract This presentation discusses the architectural phases (Roman – Middle Byzantine) of a multi-story structure uncovered at Antiochia ad Cragum during the 2019 excavation season . This structure, which spanned the Roman, Late Roman and Byzantine periods (2nd century – 7th century), provides evidence of domestic transition. As this paper will suggest, the inhabitants of Antiochia transformed private domestic spaces into facilities of agricultural production. One structure that seems to illustrate this theory has been located at the base of the Acropolis, south-east of the Agora. Since this is the first domestic space to be studied at Antiochia, the evidence presented here offers a preliminary framework for new research. Since only a single room of the structure has been excavated thus far, the analysis will focus on the Late Roman construction of a wine press. An oversized African imported Amphora, Hydria, and Cypriot pottery were found in the soil immediately covering the press surfaces. We initially identified this area as a wine press due to its shape and makeup; the floor is rectangular and constructed with mortar. The wine press appears similar to other wine presses of the period located throughout Asia minor and the Southern Levant but with some important differences: the wine press at Antiochia is unique for its simple structure. For example, there is no evidence for the existence of a connecting vat. This paper will analyze why this wine press was built inside a Gambill 2 domestic space.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Development in Western Rough Cilicia Nicholas K
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 2009 Life in the Truck Lane: Urban Development in Western Rough Cilicia Nicholas K. Rauh Purdue University, [email protected] Rhys F. Townsend Clark University, [email protected] Michael C. Hoff University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Matthew Dillon Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Martin W. Doyle University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Rauh, Nicholas K.; Townsend, Rhys F.; Hoff, Michael C.; Dillon, Matthew; Doyle, Martin W.; Ward, Cheryl A.; Rothaus, Richard M.; Caner, Hülya; Akkemik, Ünal; Wandsnider, LuAnn; Ozaner, F. Sancar; and Dore, Christopher D., "Life in the Truck Lane: Urban Development in Western Rough Cilicia" (2009). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 74. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/74 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Nicholas K. Rauh, Rhys F. Townsend, Michael C. Hoff, Matthew Dillon, Martin W. Doyle, Cheryl A. Ward, Richard M. Rothaus, Hülya Caner, Ünal Akkemik, LuAnn Wandsnider, F. Sancar Ozaner, and Christopher D. Dore This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/ 74 JAHRESHEFTE DES ÖSTERREICHISCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTES IN WIEN Band 78 JAHRESHEFTE DES ÖSTERREICHISCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTES IN WIEN BAND 78 2009 Vorgelegt von w.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Mosaics from the Courtyard of the Great Bath at Antiochia Ad
    JMR 10, 2017 83-100 DOI: 10.26658/jmr.357013 Geometric Mosaics from the Courtyard of the Great Bath at Antiochia ad Cragum in Western Rough Cilica Batı Dağlık Kilikya Bölgesi Antiochia ad Cragum Kenti Büyük Hamam Yapısı Havuzlu Avlu Mekanı’nın Geometrik Mozaikleri Birol CAN* (Received 03 October 2016, accepted after revision 20 June 2017) Abstract The original floors of the courtyard and room with apse (frigidarium?), recently uncovered at the Great Bath Complex in Antiochia ad Cragum, one of the better preserved structures of the ancient city located along the Mediterranean coast of western Rough Cilicia, are covered with mosaics. Only a few fragments of the room with apse mosaic have been preserved, but the courtyard mosaic has remained largely intact. These mosaics, consisting of panels and borders, contain a wide variety of geometric motifs. The geometrical patterns seen here have been encountered in Roman mosaics throughout the entire Mediterranean basin from the Middle East to the Iberian Peninsula. However, in terms of motif and technique, the closest similar examples of this third century AD mosaic of the courtyard can be found in Anatolia, including in particular the region of Cilicia. Keywords: Rough Cilicia, Antiochia ad Cragum, bath, mosaic, geometric. Öz Batı Dağlık Kilikya bölgesinin kıyı kenti Antiochia ad Cragum’un en sağlam yapılarından biri olan Büyük Hamam kompleksinin şu ana kadar açılan havuzlu avlu ve apsisli mekan (frigidarium?) bölümlerinin zemin- leri mozaik döşemeyle kaplıdır. Apsisli mekan mozaiklerinin çok azı korunabilmiştir, havuzlu avlu mozaikleri ise büyük ölçüde sağlam kalabilmiştir. Panolar ve bordürlerden oluşan bu mozaikler çok çeşitli geometrik repertuara sahiptir.
    [Show full text]
  • Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey: Report of the 2011 Season, Part Two Nicholas K
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project, School of Languages and Cultures 1996-2011 1-10-2019 Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey: Report of the 2011 Season, Part Two Nicholas K. Rauh Purdue University, [email protected] Matthew Dillon Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/rcas Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Rauh, Nicholas K. and Dillon, Matthew, "Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey: Report of the 2011 Season, Part Two" (2019). Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project, 1996-2011. Paper 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316872 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Rough Cilicia Highland Archaeological Survey, Report of the 2011 Season Part Two: Pedestrian Survey Nicholas K. Rauh, Purdue University, [email protected] Matthew Dillon, Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] 2011 RCSP Pedestrian Survey Report The 2011 season of the Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project was conducted between July 21 and August 12 2011. Pedestrian team participants included project director, Prof. Nicholas Rauh of Purdue University, Prof. Mathew J. Dillon of Loyola Marymount University (Los Angeles), Caroline Autret of the University of Paris, Grace Conyers of Purdue University, and undergraduate students, Matthew J. Dillon Jr. of Fordham University, Amber Hawley of University of Wisconsin at Lacrosse, Kevin Kay of the University of Evansville, and David O’Brochta of the University of Maryland. Our service representative was Yusuf Kiraç from the General Directorate for Cultural Heritage and Museums in Ankara.
    [Show full text]
  • 41Th International Symposium of Excavations, Surveys And
    REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE AND MUSEUMS 41st INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF EXCAVATIONS, SURVEYS AND ARCHAEOMETRY 17-21 JUNE 2019 Congress Centre Dicle University DİYARBAKIR Congress 17 June 2019 18 June 2019 19 June 2019 20 June 2019 21 June 2019 22 June 2019 Centre Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday A Hall Results of Results of Results of Results of Results of Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-16:30 B Hall Results of Results of Results of Results of Results of Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations Excavations 11:00-12:00 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-17:35 14:00-17:15 Results of Results of Surveys Results of Surveys Results of Surveys Excavations Results of Surveys C Hall 11:00-13:05 09:00-12:05 10:00-12:05 Excursion of 09:00-12:35 09:00-12:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 Diyarbakır 14:00-17:35 14:00-16:15 Results of Results of Results of Results of Surveys Archaeometry Archaeometry Results of Surveys D Hall Archaeometry 09:00-12:05 09:00-12:05 09.00-12:05 14:00-17:05 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 Results of Results of Results of Results of Surveys Archaeometry Archaeometry Archaeometry 09:00-12:05 E Hall 09:00-12:45 10:00-12:00 10:00-12:00 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-18:15 14:00-16:10 17 JUNE 2019 MONDAY MEETINGS ON THE RESULTS
    [Show full text]
  • Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project, School of Languages and Cultures 1996-2011
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project, School of Languages and Cultures 1996-2011 4-5-2018 Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1996 Season Nicholas K. Rauh Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/rcas Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Rauh, Nicholas K., "Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1996 Season" (2018). Rough Cilicia Archaeological Survey Project, 1996-2011. Paper 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316719 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. THE ROUGH CILICIA REGIONAL SURVEY PROJECT N.K. RAUH, DIRECTOR DEPT. OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY HALL PURDUE UNIVERSITY W. LAFAYETTE, IN 47907 TEL.: 371-494-4122 FAX: 317-496-1755 email: [email protected] PROVINCE: ANTALYA; DISTRICT: ALANYA ​ ​ ​ Map 1 Rough Cilicia Regional Archaeological Survey Project: Report of the 1996 Season. Jennifer Tobin (Bilkent University, Ankara Turkey), Richard Blanton (Purdue ​ University; Mette Korsholm (Danish Institute in Athens), Nicholas Rauh ​ ​ (Purdue University), Rhys Townsend (Clark University), Stephen Tracy (Ohio ​ ​ State University). The historical character of the Mediterranean reflects the importance of extensive long-distance sea travel that moved commodities, culture, and people, and that figured into military strategy and state formation.
    [Show full text]