DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Council 14380 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Wednesday 2 March 2005 ______ The President (The Hon. Dr Meredith Burgmann) took the chair at 11.00 a.m. The Clerk of the Parliaments offered the Prayers. AUDIT OFFICE Report The President announced the receipt, pursuant to the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983, of a performance audit report of the Auditor-General entitled "Follow-up of Performance Audit: Maintenance of Public Housing", dated March 2005. Ordered to be printed. GENDER VIOLENCE IN SPORT Motion by Ms Lee Rhiannon agreed to: 1. That this House: (a) recognises that gender violence in sport is a national issue and not only limited to football, (b) commends the National Rugby League (NRL) for commissioning the University of Sydney's "Playing by the Rules Project" and committing to the project's recommendations, and (c) commends the Australian Football League (AFL) for releasing "Discussion Document Re Development of AFL Response to the Issue of Violence Against Women" and inviting public comment. 2. That this House supports Football Fans Against Sexual Assault (FFASA) in: (a) submitting a proposal for change "Towards Champions: A Better Culture, A Better Game", to the AFL and NRL on behalf of over 1,000 football fans and citizens Australiawide, and (b) calling on the AFL and NRL to become national and international leaders in the area of gender violence prevention in sport. 3. That this House calls on the AFL and NRL to consider and implement FFASA recommendations, in particular recommendations to: (a) foster increased Australian-based research and expertise in the area of gender violence prevention in sport, (b) include fans and the broader football community in culture change strategies by hosting a "Weekend of Champions" during the 2005 season, whereby players and the football community don purple armbands, (c) invite leading gender violence prevention activist and ex-All Star American footballer, Jackson Katz, to Australia to increase public awareness of how gender violence may be combated in sport, (d) work with the Federal and State governments in developing annual awards aimed at recognising integrity, innovation and leadership in sport, and (e) increase the participation of women in the game. 4. That this House calls on: (a) the AFL and NRL corporate sponsors to sponsor the “Weekend of Champions” by providing purple armbands that can be worn by the football public, and (b) the Hon. Sandra Nori, MP, Minister for Sport and Recreation and Minister for Women, and Senator the Hon. Rod Kemp, Federal Minister for the Arts and Sport, to work with the AFL, NRL and other sports bodies in developing annual awards aimed at recognising integrity, innovation and leadership in sport. 2 March 2005 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 14381 ROYAL NATIONAL PARK COASTAL SHACK LICENCES Production of Documents Motion by Ms Lee Rhiannon agreed to: That, under standing order 52, there be laid upon the table of the House within 14 days of the date of the passing of this resolution the following documents, created since 1 January 2003, in the possession, custody or control of the Minister for the Environment and the Department of Environment and Conservation [DEC], including the former National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], in relation to coastal shack licences in the Royal National Park: (a) a briefing document from the former NPWS to the Minister for the Environment, concerning the proposed Royal National Park licensing scheme, entitled "NPWS Briefing document to Minister ROYAL NATIONAL PARK PROPOSED LICENSING SCHEME, Electorate Heathcote Paul McLeay, TRIM DOC 02/06781", (b) any correspondence from the Independent Commission Against Corruption to the former NPWS concerning a proposed probity audit in relation to the handling of shack issues, that comments on the level of public consultation undertaken by the former NPWS in developing appropriate management arrangements for the shack areas, (c) any correspondence, including faxes and emails, between the former NPWS, or the current National Parks and Wildlife Division of DEC, and consultants, Graham Brooks and Associates, regarding the current finalisation of a conservation management plan in relation to the Royal National Park coastal shacks, (d) the minutes of any meetings of the NPWS Advisory Council at which Mr Mike Patrick, Regional Manager of the former NPWS, made a presentation on shack issues, including copies of any papers or slides presented by Mr Patrick and any subsequent correspondence or communication between the NPWS Advisory Council and the Sydney South Region of the former NPWS on this matter, and (e) any document which records or refers to the production of documents as a result of this order of the House. PETITIONS Crown Land Leases Petition requesting the withdrawal of changes to the rental structure of Crown land leases, particularly enclosed road permits, received from the Hon. Rick Colless. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Postponement of Business Government Business Orders of the Day Nos 1, 2 and 4 postponed on motion by the Hon. Tony Kelly. PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONS ACT 1997: DISALLOWANCE OF THE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONS (NOISE CONTROL) AMENDMENT (MOTOR CYCLE NOISE CONTROL EQUIPMENT) REGULATION 2004 The PRESIDENT: Order! Pursuant to standing orders the question is: That the motion proceed as business of the House. Question agreed to. Motion by the Hon. Dr Arthur Chesterfield-Evans agreed to: That the matter proceed forthwith. The Hon. Dr ARTHUR CHESTERFIELD-EVANS [11.09 a.m.]: I move: That under section 41 of the Interpretation Act 1987 this House disallows the Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Amendment (Motor Cycle Noise Control Equipment) Regulation 2004, published in Government Gazette No. 204, dated 24 December 2004, page 9677, and tabled in this House on 22 February 2005. I did not particularly want to move this disallowance motion, but this regulation was not the Christmas present the motorcycle riders of New South Wales wanted. The issue concerns stickers on exhausts. Basically, the Government has gone down a completely wrong track. Because it is difficult to enforce noise regulations, the 14382 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 2 March 2005 Government has changed direction, to now enforcing stickers on exhausts. The number of motorcycles on the road in New South Wales has increased by 42 per cent over recent years, from 74,000 in 1995 to over 105,000 in 2004. The number of people in New South Wales with a motorcycle licence in 2003 was 400,370. A number of members of this House have a motorcycle licence, including the Hon. John Tingle, the Minister for Roads, and the Hon. Charlie Lynn, who rides his Harley to Parliament. I imagine a number of members representing country areas also have motorcycle licences. There has been a growth in the popularity of motorcycle riding in the past 10 years—as mentioned, a 42 per cent increase. This includes a lot of older riders returning to riding, and a lot of young people who have taken to the ease of riding scooters round the city. The regulation of motorcycles now affects a large number of the population of New South Wales. I have had discussions with the Motorcycle Council of New South Wales, which is of the view that excessively loud motorcycles do not contribute to a good public image for riders. The council is in agreement with reasonable limits for all vehicles, including motorcycles. It is recognised that a very small number of relatively noisy vehicles creates a problem for all the community. Hence regulations need to be directed to capturing the excessively noisy ones. However, this is not what this Environment Protection Authority [EPA] regulation actually does. The EPA regulation is retrospective and, having no margin for test error, is almost impossible to comply with. Its enforcement is trapping the ordinary rider and generating self-serving enforcement statistics. Almost any motorcycle is captured, leading to this new law being used for other purposes. The Christmas Eve changes to regulations fail to solve the problems of retrospectivity and the ability of motorcyclists to comply with noise levels. The changes missed the point when the regulation continues to entrap riders, is seen as a sticker tax with revenue as the objective, and has no environmental benefit. Motorcycles, like any other vehicles, need to have their mufflers replaced from time to time. Most vehicle owners do not purchase the original factory part, but purchase from aftermarket suppliers. Any car owner is familiar with this practice. Locally made or imported mufflers can be supplied for less than half the cost of the original part. A typical replacement motorcycle muffler from an original supplier will cost in the order of $1,500—significantly more than a car muffler. An EPA regulation now retrospectively demands an aftermarket muffler be fitted with a label, or the rider will be fined $200. If the matter is taken to court, the rider is exposed to the criminal provisions and a fine of $5,500. When this regulation was introduced in 1999 there were no labels generally available to riders so that they could comply with this retrospective law. Only the Motorcycle Council of New South Wales has made labels generally available since 2004, despite its opposition to the retrospective regulations. The Motorcycle Council of New South Wales has been pointing out to the EPA since 1999 that these labels are retrospective. Yet the EPA has refused to acknowledge this, and has provided no infrastructure at all for the supply and fit of labels specified by its regulation, nor has it provided sound test facilities other than at its enforcement station at Lidcombe. The EPA has been relying on a volunteer organisation, the Motorcycle Council of New South Wales, for implementation of the authority's retrospective regulation. The EPA technical inquiries line even refers requests for labels to the Motorcycle Council of New South Wales! The aftermarket labels required under the EPA regulation are retrospective for all motorcycles, not just those built prior to July 1988, as the Christmas changes to regulations suggest.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senator Claire Moore
    Senator Claire Moore WEEKLY UPDATE: 1st June, 2018 Phone: (07) 3252 7101; email: [email protected]; Web:www.clairemoore.net; Twitter: www.twitter.com/SenClaireMoore; www.facebook.com/SenatorClaireMoore; ***** Labor’s National Conference will now be held in Adelaide from Sun 16 Dec to Tue 18 December. **** THIS WEEK: Apart for yet another implosion of One Nation this week, the main focus in Canberra has been on the changes the Government has proposed to the Family Court and the process of Senate Estimates. Labor welcomes the Government’s acknowledgement of the crisis in the family court system, and the pain it is causing families caught up in it. This situation has been going for far too long, and has worsened on the Government’s watch. Reform is needed but already serious concerns have been expressed as to some of the potential consequences of what the Government is proposing. This is especially the case in regard to the removal of the Appeals Division of the Family Court – which means that the toughest and most complex family law cases will no longer be heard by specialists. At the moment we have a lack of detail and will examines the legislation closely when it is made available. Estimates are a vital part of our parliamentary process and our democracy. They provide the opportunity for Senators to examine the performance of the Departments and Agencies. It allows us to scrutinise policy, programs and performance. Such scrutiny is very healthy for our political and administrative processes. It invariably provides many illuminating insights into the management of our government and it’s not, as this week’s Update will attest, – all good news.
    [Show full text]
  • Todd Farrell Thesis
    The Australian Greens: Realignment Revisited in Australia Todd Farrell Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the Doctorate of Philosophy Swinburne University of Technology Faculty of Health, Arts and Design School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities 2020 ii I declare that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree in any university or another educational institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. iii ABSTRACT Scholars have traditionally characterised Australian politics as a stable two-party system that features high levels of partisan identity, robust democratic features and strong electoral institutions (Aitkin 1982; McAllister 2011). However, this characterisation masks substantial recent changes within the Australian party system. Growing dissatisfaction with major parties and shifting political values have altered the partisan contest, especially in the proportionally- represented Senate. This thesis re-examines partisan realignment as an explanation for party system change in Australia. It draws on realignment theory to argue that the emergence and sustained success of the Greens represents a fundamental shift in the Australian party system. Drawing from Australian and international studies on realignment and party system reform, the thesis combines an historical institutionalist analysis of the Australian party system with multiple empirical measurements of Greens partisan and voter support. The historical institutionalist approach demonstrates how the combination of subnational voting mechanisms, distinctly postmaterialist social issues, federal electoral strategy and a weakened Labor party have driven a realignment on the centre-left of Australian politics substantial enough to transform the Senate party system.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of Australian Parliaments by Party and Gender: a Quick Guide
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2018–19 UPDATED 10 OCTOBER 2018 Composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender: a quick guide Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration Section This quick guide contains the most recent tables showing the composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender (see Table 1 and Table 2 below). It takes into account changes to the Commonwealth, New South Wales, Victorian and Western Australian parliaments since the last update was published on 18 May 2018. Commonwealth In the Senate: • Following the High Court ruling of 9 May 2018 that the election of Katy Gallagher (ALP, ACT) was void under section 44 of the Constitution, David Smith (ALP, ACT) was elected (by count- back) to fill the seat on 23 May 2018. • Following the resignation of Lee Rhiannon (AG, NSW) on 15 August 2018, the resulting casual vacancy was filled by Mehreen Faruqi (AG, NSW) on 20 August 2018. • Following the resignation of Andrew Bartlett (AG, Qld) on 27 August 2018, Larissa Waters (AG, Qld) returned to the Senate to fill the resulting casual vacancy on 10 September 2018. • Steve Martin (IND, Tas.) announced on 25 May 2018 that he had joined the Nationals. • Fraser Anning (IND, Qld) announced on 4 June 2018 that he had joined Katter’s Australian Party. • Brian Burston (IND, NSW) announced on 18 June 2018 that he had joined the United Australia Party. In the House of Representatives: • Five Members—Tim Hammond (ALP, Perth, WA), Justine Keay (ALP, Braddon, Tas.), Susan Lamb (ALP, Longman, Qld), Rebekha Sharkie (CA, Mayo, SA) and Josh Wilson (ALP, Fremantle, WA)— resigned in May.
    [Show full text]
  • Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice the Australian Experience
    Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice The Australian Experience Glynn Evans Department of Politics and International Relations School of Social Sciences The University of Adelaide June 2019 Table of Contents Abstract ii Statement of Authorship iii Acknowledgements iv Preface vi 1. Introduction 1 2. District Magnitude, Proportionality and the Number of 30 Parties 3. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in the 57 Senate 4. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in Western 102 Australia 5. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in South Eastern Jurisdictions 132 6. Proportional Representation and Minor Parties: Some 170 Deviating Cases 7. Does Proportional Representation Favour 204 Independents? 8. Proportional Representation and Women – How Much 231 Help? 9. Conclusion 247 Bibliography 251 Appendices 260 i Abstract While all houses of Australian parliaments using proportional representation use the Single Transferable Vote arrangement, district magnitudes (the numbers of members elected per division) and requirements for casting a formal vote vary considerably. Early chapters of this thesis analyse election results in search for distinct patterns of proportionality, the numbers of effective parties and partisan advantage under different conditions. This thesis argues that while district magnitude remains the decisive factor in determining proportionality (the higher the magnitude, the more proportional the system), ballot paper numbering requirements play a more important role in determining the number of (especially) parliamentary parties. The general pattern is that, somewhat paradoxically, the more freedom voters have to choose their own preference allocations, or lack of them, the smaller the number of parliamentary parties. Even numbered magnitudes in general, and six member divisions in particular, provide some advantage to the Liberal and National Parties, while the Greens are disadvantaged in five member divisions as compared to six or seven member divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Faces Stiff Senate Opposition to Key Tax Hikes
    Labor faces stiff Senate opposition to key tax hikes By Phillip Coorey 11 Dec 2018 — 11:00 PM An incoming Labor government will struggle to legislate its key tax increases with almost the entire Senate crossbench opposed to its plans to abolish cash refunds for excess franking credits, and none prepared to support the limiting of future negative gearing to newly constructed homes. In addition, a Labor government could also struggle to find support to lift the top marginal tax rate by 2 percentage points and unwind stages two and three of the income tax cuts, which have already been legislated. A survey of the entire Senate crossbench shows that Labor, if it wins the election, has next to no hope of passing either the negative gearing or franking credit changes before June 30, 2019, the date the term of the existing Senate expires. Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen said that if Labor won the election, he hoped the Senate would respect its mandate for policies announced years in advance. Alex Ellinghausen / Fairfax Media If Labor wants to pass the measures after July 1, it and the Greens will most likely need to win joint control of the Senate at the election because the handful of crossbenchers who are serving six-year terms and who will still be there after July 1, are opposed to both tax measures. Labor has proposed in total tax increases worth $30.6 billion over four years and $280 billion over 10 years. It says it will use this revenue to pay for its promises as well as deliver bigger surpluses and lower debt to buttress the economy against any global downturn.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Released Under FOI 19/250 Page 2 of 133
    Document 1 - Page 2 of 2 S22(1)(a)(ii) S22(1)(a)(ii) Previous Cabinet Warringah NSW Tony Abbott Minister S22(1)(a)(ii) S22(1)(a)(ii) Attorney-General's Department documents released under FOI 19/250 Page 2 of 133 Document 2 - Page 4 of 5 (www.blackberry.com) From: S47F(1) Date: Friday, 02 Aug 2019, 4:25 pm To: S47F(1) , Wellington, Tim <[email protected]> Subject: FW: CPAC talking points [DLM=For-Official-Use-Only] For Official Use Only FYI From: Atkinson, Lucinda Sent: Friday, 2 August 2019 4:20 PM To: S47F(1) Cc: AGO DLO; Transparency; Walter, Andrew Subject: CPAC talking points [DLM=For-Official-Use-Only] For Official Use Only Hi S47F(1) As requested, below are some points about the CPAC letter and FITS in case this is raised with the AGO. Happy to discuss. L ______________ Talking Points · The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme (the scheme) commenced on 10 December 2018. The scheme is designed to provide the public and government decision-makers with visibility of the nature, level and extent of foreign influence on Australia's government and political process. · The scheme does not prevent people or groups from participating in political conversations, expressing views about a government or political party or advocating their political opinions on various platforms. Nor should the scheme deter people from doing so. Rather, the scheme is intended to ensure that the source of the interests being represented through such activities is clear and appropriately disclosed. · The scheme requires people or entities undertaking certain activities on behalf of a foreign principal to register, unless an exemption applies.
    [Show full text]
  • 17. the Minor Parties
    17 THE MINOR PARTIES Glenn Kefford The 2019 federal election is noteworthy for many reasons. One of the defining stories should be that the ALP and the Liberal–National Coalition have been unable to draw voters back from the minor parties and Independents. Put simply, the long-term trend is away from the major parties. In this election, there was a small nationwide increase in the vote for minor parties and Independents in the House of Representatives, while in the Senate there was a modest decline. The State-level results are more varied. The Coalition lost ground in some places and maintained its vote in others. The ALP vote, in contrast, was demolished in Tasmania and in Queensland. Almost one in three Queenslanders and Tasmanians decided to support a party or candidate in the House other than the ALP or the Coalition. Across the entire country, this was around one in four (see Figure 17.1). In the Senate, Queensland and Tasmania again had the largest non–major party vote. These results are dissected in greater detail in other chapters in this volume, but they suggest that supply-side opportunities remain for parties and candidates expressing anti–major party sentiments. Put simply, the political environment remains fertile for minor party insurgents. 343 MORRISON'S MIRACLE 40 35 35.55 33.65 32.2 30 26.2 25 25 25.09 23.8 23.47 21.1 20.4 20 19.9 19.9 19.8 19.7 19.2 18.3 18.4 17.7 17.1 15.7 15.1 15 14.6 14.3 14 14.5 13.2 13.5 12 12.2 10.7 10.7 10.8 10 10 8.8 8.6 7.7 8.1 7.3 7 7.4 5 4.7 5 3.9 4.4 4.1 2.1 0 1949 1951 1955 1958 1961 1974 1975 1977 1980 1983 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 House S ena te Figure 17.1 First‑preference votes for minor parties and Independents Source: Compiled with data kindly provided by Antony Green and from Australian Electoral Commission (2016 and 2019) .
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison's Miracle the 2019 Australian Federal Election
    MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION MORRISON'S MIRACLE THE 2019 AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION EDITED BY ANIKA GAUJA, MARIAN SAWER AND MARIAN SIMMS In memory of Dr John Beaton FASSA, Executive Director of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia from 2001 to 2018 and an avid supporter of this series of election analyses Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463618 ISBN (online): 9781760463625 WorldCat (print): 1157333181 WorldCat (online): 1157332115 DOI: 10.22459/MM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph: Scott Morrison Campaign Day 11. Photo by Mick Tsikas, AAP. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Figures . ix Plates . xiii Tables . .. xv Abbreviations . xix Acknowledgements . xxiii Contributors . xxv Foreword . xxxiii 1 . Morrison’s miracle: Analysing the 2019 Australian federal election . 1 Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer and Marian Simms Part 1. Campaign and context 2 . Election campaign overview . 21 Marian Simms 3 . The rules of the game . 47 Marian Sawer and Michael Maley 4 . Candidates and pre‑selection . .. 71 Anika Gauja and Marija Taflaga 5 . Ideology and populism . 91 Carol Johnson 6 . The personalisation of the campaign . 107 Paul Strangio and James Walter 7 . National polling and other disasters . 125 Luke Mansillo and Simon Jackman 8 .
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Released Under FOI 19/250 Page 2 of 133
    Document 1 - Page 2 of 2 S22(1)(a)(ii) S22(1)(a)(ii) Previous Cabinet Warringah NSW Tony Abbott Minister S22(1)(a)(ii) S22(1)(a)(ii) Attorney-General's Department documents released under FOI 19/250 Page 2 of 133 Document 2 - Page 4 of 5 (www.blackberry.com) From: S47F(1) Date: Friday, 02 Aug 2019, 4:25 pm To: S47F(1) , Wellington, Tim <[email protected] > Subject: FW: CPAC talking points [DLM=For-Official-Use-Only] For Official Use Only FYI From: Atkinson, Lucinda Sent: Friday, 2 August 2019 4:20 PM To: S47F(1) Cc: AGO DLO; Transparency; Walter, Andrew Subject: CPAC talking points [DLM=For-Official-Use-Only] For Official Use Only Hi S47F(1) As requested, below are some points about the CPAC letter and FITS in case this is raised with the AGO. Happy to discuss. L ______________ Talking Points · The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme (the scheme) commenced on 10 December 2018. The scheme is designed to provide the public and government decision-makers with visibility of the nature, level and extent of foreign influence on Australia's government and political process. · The scheme does not prevent people or groups from participating in political conversations, expressing views about a government or political party or advocating their political opinions on various platforms. Nor should the scheme deter people from doing so. Rather, the scheme is intended to ensure that the source of the interests being represented through such activities is clear and appropriately disclosed. · The scheme requires people or entities undertaking certain activities on behalf of a foreign principal to register, unless an exemption applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia-Press-Freedom-Chilling-Effect-Meaa.Pdf
    2 3 CONTENTS FOREWORD ebruary 28 2017 is an extraordinary example of are made in astonishing numbers compared to the Australian lawmakers’ confused approach to press relative lack of orders needed in other jurisdictions. 3 FOREWORD 49 CONFIDENTIAL SOURCES freedom. On that day, a parliamentary committee, Despite Victoria trying to reform the system in 2013, Paul Murphy F after inquiring into “freedom of speech” over nearly the problem is as out of control as ever. MEAA believes Shield laws four months, admitted that it was unable come up with reform is needed not just at a state level but also a definitive plan on what to do about section 18C of nationally so that the media’s responsibility to report on 4 IN THEIR OWN WORDS The threats to journalist sources Racial Discrimination Act. Instead, it offered no less than the courts in the public interest is maintained without are very real six options – including doing nothing. judges acting as editors, as censors, and even – way outside their responsibilities – as determiners of what is 5 THE LAW Joseph M. Fernandez On the same day, the Director-General of Asio told in the public interest. another parliamentary committee that his agency is The year in Australian media law Whistleblower protection spying on journalists and media organisations using Media organisations are also not helpful even when Peter Bartlett and Sam White Journalist Information Warrants to secretly trawl it’s in their own best interest. The sheer scale of Whistleblowers need more through their telecommunications data in the hunt for redundancies that have taken, and continue to take, 8 DEFAMATION protection Adele Ferguson whistleblowers and confidential sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalise Whistleblowing and Journalism
    CRIMINALISING JOURNALISM THE MEAA REPORT INTO THE STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN AUSTRALIA IN 2018 CRIMINALISING JOURNALISM CRIMINALISING JOURNALISM 2 THE MEAA REPORT INTO THE STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN AUSTRALIA IN 2018 THE MEAA REPORT INTO THE STATE OF PRESS FREEDOM IN AUSTRALIA IN 2018 3 CONTENTS FOREWORD BY PAUL MURPHY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MEAA 2018 MEAA FOREWORD THE INDUSTRY AUSTRALIAN Paul Murphy 3 Public interest journalism 35 PRESS FREEDOM REPORT Digital platforms 38 In their own words 5 Redundancies 40 Editor: Mike Dobbie ATTITUDES ABOUT Gender 43 THANKS TO: PRESS FREEDOM Peter Bartlett Andrew Fowler MEAA’s press freedom survey GOVERNMENT Peter Greste Mark Phillips 8 Alex Hearne The “super” ministry 45 Dean Levitan Public broadcasting 46 Johan Lindberg Sharon Murdoch THE LAW Media ownership 50 Colin Peacock The year in Australian media law Mark Phillips Asylum seekers 55 Adelaide Rosenthal Peter Bartlett, Dean Levitan and Adelaide Rosenthal 10 MEAA thanks all the Suppression orders 13 SAFETY here’s almost universal The draft law that heralded this Malcolm Turnbull, himself a former contributors to this report. acceptance of the maxim appalling new assault on press freedom journalist. Defamation 17 Cyberbullying 56 “Journalism is not a crime”. in Australia, the National Security One exception is Australia’s Legislation Amendment (Espionage and The pushback against the Bills has Design: Detention, threats and T Louise Summerton parliament – it begs to differ. Foreign Interference) Bill 2017 and the culminated in journalists and media harassment 62 Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme groups insisting on a media exemption LX9 Design NATIONAL SECURITY Legislating for Australia’s national Bill 2017, was rightly met with a storm – a move supported by the chair of Impunity 64 security has drifted a long way from the of protest, not least from MEAA but Transparency International Australia, Cover image: The creeping criminalisation fight against terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017
    The Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017 February 2018 © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 ISBN 978-1-76010-708-6 Committee contact details PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate_ec This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Committee members Senator Jonathon Duniam, Chair LP, Tasmania Senator Janet Rice, Deputy Chair AG, Victoria Senator Anthony Chisholm ALP, Queensland Senator Linda Reynolds CSC LP, Western Australia Senator John Williams NATS, New South Wales Senator Anne Urquhart ALP, Tasmania Participating members for this inquiry Senator Sarah Hanson-Young AG, South Australia Senator Brian Burston PHON, New South Wales Committee secretariat Ms Christine McDonald, Committee Secretary Ms Fattimah Imtoual, Senior Research Officer Ms Georgia Fletcher, Administration Officer iii iv Contents Committee membership ................................................................................... iii Inquiry into the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Amendment (Fair and Balanced) Bill 2017 .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]