Sexual Citizenship and EU Conditionality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sexual Citizenship and EU Conditionality of the minority or majority in terms of the Sexual Citizenship and power structure of that state, and very importantly, to which member state does EU Conditionality the citizen belong? In the process of EU enlargement, applicant countries have to harmonize their national legislation with Can Supranational the acquis communautaire before entry into Organizations Facilitate the the union.3 This paper explores whether Advancement of Sexual conditionality to EU membership has served as an effective instrument for Minorities? positive change in the lives of sexual The Case of Former Yugoslav minorities in the applicant countries. More Republics and EU Accession specifically, this paper will focus on the former Yugoslav republics of Serbia and Montenegro, which are currently in the Séhzad M. Sooklall negotiation phase for EU accession, and Croatia, which was admitted to the union in July 2013.4 itizenship is transcending traditional This paper will begin with the European states’ borders. More introduction of relevant context, including Cthan a half billion Europeans are operational definitions. It will be followed now citizens of both the European Union 1 by a review of Contested Terrain of Sexual (EU) and one of the 28 member states. Citizenship: EU Accession and the Changing Article 20 of The Treaty on the Position of Sexual Minorities in the Post-Yugoslav Functioning of the European Union states context, by Katja Kahlina. It will then that “every person holding the nationality compare EU accession of the former of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Yugoslav republics and the resulting Union” and that “citizenship of the Union impact on sexual minorities with recent shall be additional to and not replace 2 events in France in regards to same sex national citizenship.” Do the rights and marriage legalization. This comparative and protections afforded by member states interpretive analysis finds that although necessarily mirror the ones afforded at the advancement of sexual citizenship in supranational level? Is one set of France was not imposed by the European citizenship rights more desirable than the Union, riots and anti-gay violence still other? Several factors must be considered: does the citizen in question constitute part 3 Katja Kahlina, “Contested Terrain of Sexual Citizenship: EU Accession and the Changing Position of Sexual Minorities in the Post-Yugoslav 1 Dimitry Kochenov, “The Present and the Future Context,” University of Edinburgh School of Law: The of EU Citizenship: A Bird’s Eye View of the Legal Europeanisation of Citizenship in the Successor States of the Debate,” Jean Monnet Working Papers (NYU Law Former Yugoslavia (CITSEE) Working Paper Series No. School) No.2/12 (2012): 3, 2013/33 (2013): 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2063200. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_i 2 The Member States, “Consolidated version of the d=2388884. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,” 4 “EU Enlargement: Check Current Status,” Official Journal of the European Union (2012), European Commission, last modified April 16, 2015, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/check- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT. current-status/index_en.htm. erupted in Paris just as they did in by extension, citizens of the supranational Belgrade, Zagreb and Montenegro, which European Union are afforded equal rights suggests that causality for anti-gay regardless of gender or sexual orientation. sentiment might not necessarily be rooted A supranational organization lies in EU conditionality but is likely a somewhere between a confederation and a symptom of generalized homophobia. This federation, but it does not fall exclusively paper presents the argument that the into either category because there are advancement of sexual minority rights several characteristics that are unique to comes at a cost regardless of whether it is this type of union.6 For example, while endogenously or exogenously promulgated competence is divided between the EU and , and often with vitriol and protests the individual states, sovereignty remains targeted toward the very same minority exclusively within the realm of the member groups expected to benefit from changes in states.7 Kiljunen8 makes the point that EU the law. However, because the gains in legislation takes precedence over national legal status come with increased rights and laws in areas where the EU has been remedies, it is a worthy and significant goal accorded competence,9 just as U.S. federal to pursue in spite of the costs. law and the constitution take precedence The paper concludes by posing over state law only in matters where the relevant questions concerning the power of federal government has been granted such supranational organizations, and whether powers by the Constitution. such organizations can facilitate the The important concept here is that advancement of sexual minority rights. a supranational organization is a collective Taking the EU as a model, can other body of states acting through a central supranational organizations (World Trade power in matters delegated to it by the Organization or the World Bank) impose individual states. The states defer to the membership requirements that ask not only supranational rule in the matters delegated for the respect of sexual minority rights via to that union. The EU started as an declaratory instruments but also impose economic union, but gradually expanded its strict enforcement, regulatory and scope. Social, political and human rights disciplinary regimes for violating such eventually made their way into the acquis rights? communautaire. The acquis communautaire is defined as the “[c]ommon foundation of rights and obligations which binds together BACKGROUND Gender equality and non- 6 discrimination on the basis of sex, racial or Kimmo Kiljunen, “The European Constitution in the Making,” Centre for European Policy Studies (2004): ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, 22, age and sexual orientation are amongst the 7 Ibid. founding values of the European Union.5 8 “Composition: Representatives of the National Therefore, citizens of member states and, Parliaments,” The European Convention, last visited April 16, 2014, http://european- convention.europa.eu/EN/Static/Static6cf8.html?la 5 European Commission, “The EU Explained: ng=EN&Content=Parlement_Nat. Kimmo Justice, Fundamental Rights and Equality,” Kiljunen is a former member of the Finnish Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Parliament and member of the European (2014): 4, Convention that drafted a constitution for the EU. http://europa.eu/pol/pdf/flipbook/en/justice_en. 9 Kiljunen, “The European Constitution in the pdf. Making,” 19. the Member States of the European This is especially seen vis-à-vis EU Union.”10 It is derived from the French conditionality toward harmonization of verb acquérir, which means to acquire, and sexual minority rights.14 therefore conjointly means that which the community has already acquired. This concept is important here because new LITERATURE REVIEW members seeking to enter the union have This analysis examines Kahlina’s to harmonize their national laws to grant paper in great depth because of her seminal those acquired European rights to their work on the issue of sexual minority rights citizens as well. Hence, as the rights of in the context of former Yugoslav sexual minorities became part of the republics’ accession to the EU. As a 11 European acquis in the 2000s, the current and popular topic in human rights, applicant countries from The Socialist there is however limited scholarship Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) specifically on the issue of LGBT rights in had to enact non-discrimination legislation the context of Western Balkan states. This to protect sexual minorities. paper not only builds on the work laid out The SFRY was a federation of six by Kahlina but also offers a different socialist republics: Bosnia and perspective and analysis using secondary Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, sources. Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia, which Kahlina, in Contested Terrain of disintegrated in the 1990s as a result of a Sexual Citizenship: EU Accession and the number of regional ethnic conflicts. These Changing Position of Sexual Minorities in the countries are pertinent because they Post-Yugoslav Context, explores the point constitute the majority of applicants brought forth by feminist and sexuality 12 currently negotiating for EU accession. studies scholars that citizenship rights and While Croatia successfully acceded to the duties are accorded differently on the basis union in 2013, Serbia and Montenegro are of gender and sexuality.15 The author 13 still undergoing the negotiating phase. submits that because citizenship is granted Moreover, these three countries are largely on the basis of ancestry, which is relevant to this study because despite their inevitably linked to reproductive and geographic proximity, they have distinctive monogamous sexuality, society has an narratives and imaginaries in EU accession. inherent bias toward heterosexuality.16 Throughout her paper, Kahlina discusses 10 “Community Acqui,” EuroVoc: Multilingual the tensions between nationalism, nation- Thesaurus of the European Union, last visited April 16, building, and the transnational processes of 2014, EU accession and how these impacted http://eurovoc.europa.eu/drupal/?q=request&uri= http://eurovoc.europa.eu/210682. sexual citizenship in the former Yugoslav 17 11 Council of the European
Recommended publications
  • Croatia 07/2018
    Monitoring Implementation of the Council of Europe Recommendation to the member states on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity CM/Rec(2010)5 DOCUMENTATION REPORT ON THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA 07/2018 Prepared by ZAGREB PRIDE web: www.zagreb-pride.net email: [email protected] ++385(0)1 580 65 60 Skype: zagrebpride Social media: @zagrebpride _________ TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 About Zagreb Pride 4 About the Report 4 Political System and Demographics 4 Executive Summary 5 Methodology 8 Acknowledgements 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Section 1 – Implementation of the Recommendation 18 Section 2 – Implementation of the specific provisions in the Appendix 21 2.1. Right to life, security and protection from violence 21 2.1.A. “Hate crimes” and other hate-motivated incidents 21 2.1.A.1 Hate crime legislation 21 2.1.A.2 Underreporting of homophobic and transphobic hate crimes 22 2.1.A.3 Documenting and reporting hate crimes 24 2.1.A.4. Zagreb Pride’s compiled data on hate crimes 25 2.1.A.5. Hate crimes – case studies 27 2.1.B. “Hate speech” 31 2.1.B.1. Hate speech – case studies 33 2.2. Freedom of association 38 2.3. Freedom of expression and peaceful assembly 41 2.4. Right to respect for private and family life 46 2.4.1. Legal gender recognition 46 2.4.2. Legal recognition of same sex couples 47 2.4.3. Institutional and political discrimination of same-sex life partners 48 2.4.4. Discrimination of informal same-sex life partners – case studies 50 2.4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Rule of Law Report - Targeted Stakeholder Consultation
    2021 Rule of Law Report - targeted stakeholder consultation Submission by ILGA-Europe and member organisations Arcigay & Certi Diritti (Italy); Bilitis, GLAS Foundation & Deystvie (Bulgaria); Çavaria (Belgium - Flanders); Háttér Társaság (Hungary); Legebrita (Slovenia); PROUD (Czech Republic); RFSL (Sweden) and Zagreb Pride (Croatia). ILGA-Europe are an independent, international LGBTI rights non-governmental umbrella organisation bringing together over 600 organisations from 54 countries in Europe and Central Asia. We are part of the wider international ILGA organisation, but ILGA-Europe were established as a separate region of ILGA and an independent legal entity in 1996. ILGA itself was created in 1978. https://www.ilga-europe.org/who- we-are/what-ilga-europe Contents Horizontal developments ........................................................................................................................ 2 Belgium ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Czech Republic ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Hungary
    [Show full text]
  • OUTSPOKEN Human Rights for Everyone
    OUTSPOKEN Human Rights for Everyone. Everywhere. International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission • October 2006 IGLHRC WORKS ON BEHALF OF DETAINEES IN CAMEROON On May 21, 2005, Cameroonian The arrests of young men at the bar were fi rst reported by the local law enforcement agents stormed newspaper and soon were picked up by national and local TV stations, which an outdoor nightclub popular aired images of the detainees being paraded in front of television cameras with the local gay and lesbian shortly after their arrest. The case garnered signifi cant publicity nationally community in the Cameroonian and caused pain and embarrassment for the men and their families. capital, Yaoundé, and arrested several dozen people. Over the Within days after their arrests, IGLHRC’s Africa Specialist, Cary Johnson, next few days, most of those issued a statement to alert the international community of the crackdown arrested were able to negotiate in Cameroon. The announcement was followed by a letter-writing campaign for their freedom, but 11 of on behalf of the detainees, co-sponsored by “Behind the Mask”, a South Some of the Cameroon Detainees and the arrestees, all young men Africa-based regional LGBT media and human rights organization. IGLHRC human rights defender Alice Nkom between the ages of 17 and also found a local attorney to take the case and provided legal assistance 35 with few resources, were while the men were detained. The attorney, Mr. Duga Titanji, successfully charged with “homosexuality” and sent to the notorious Kondengui Prison. petitioned for the youngest man, only 17 at the time of his arrest, to be transferred into a juvenile facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Queer Migration in & out of Croatia: Waitressing Is an Awful Job When
    Queer migration in & out of Croatia: Waitressing is an awful job when you’re gay in a straight bar1 Amir Hodžić, Independent Scholar Starting point: Zrinjevac Park, 10 000 Zagreb The park on Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square, colloquially called Zrinjevac, is the oldest promenade in downtown Zagreb. Since 1872 many significant social and cultural events have taken place there. On June 29th 2002, another historical public gathering was held in Zrinjevac, the 1st Zagreb Pride. That day, around 300 participants marched through the city centre heavily guarded by the police. That did not stop numerous insults coming from both “ordinary” citizens and organized groups of young neo-fascists and skinheads who managed to throw tear gas at the parade and beat up around 30 Pride participants. While 27 people were arrested, no one was ever charged with assault or discrimination. At the turn of the century, in Croatia, more precisely in Zagreb, the growth and integration of the queer community/movement was enabled partly by the changes after the 2000s elections,2 and partly by the development of Internet forums. The year 2002 marks the increased visibility of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Transexual, Intersex and Queer (LGBTTIQ) community and movement in Croatia, and the beginning of more intense lobbying and advocacy for the rights of “sexual and gender minorities” within the Croatian legal system. The same year, LORI, a lesbian organization from Rijeka, implemented the 1st national campaign for the promotion of LGBTTIQ rights. The campaign included a TV clip Love is Love, which was banned by national television as “inappropriate”.
    [Show full text]
  • •Œwe Can No Longer Declare Ourselves A
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2010 “We Can No Longer Declare Ourselves a Multicultural City Until We Start Reacting to Things Like This” : Contextualizing the Violence at the 2008 Queer Sarajevo Festival Sarah Schrag SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Schrag, Sarah, "“We Can No Longer Declare Ourselves a Multicultural City Until We Start Reacting to Things Like This” : Contextualizing the Violence at the 2008 Queer Sarajevo Festival" (2010). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 844. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/844 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “We can no longer declare ourselves a multicultural city until we start reacting to things like this” 1: Contextualizing the Violence at the 2008 Queer Sarajevo Festival Schrag, Sarah Academic Director: Fridman, Orli Project Advisor: Grujic, Marija Oberlin College Major: Comparative American Studies Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Balkans: Post-Conflict
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic and Dating Violence Against Lbt Women in Eu
    DOMESTIC AND DATING VIOLENCE AGAINST LBT WOMEN IN THE EU EDITED BY GIACOMO VIGGIANI Bleeding Love: Raising Awareness on Domestic and Dating Violence Against Lesbians and Transwomen in the European Union Project coordinator: Giacomo Viggiani Scientific Leader: Susanna Pozzolo Editor: Giacomo Viggiani Authors: Anna Lorenzetti, Arianna Petilli, Bea Sándor, Giacomo Viggiani, Jasna Magi ć, Jelena Postic, Katalin Ráhel Turai, Kenneth Mills, Lora Novachkova, Maria Federica Moscati, Marta Ramos, Mia Gonan, Michaël Veltens, Monika Pisankaneva, Telmo Fernandes, and Tomas Vytautas Raskevi čius. Proofreading: Ian Pinchen Cover Design: Flavia Pellegrinelli ISBN: 978-88-909905-1-9 The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This book would not be possible without the support of the DG Justice of the EU Commission under the specific programme “Daphne 2007-2013” and the project Bleeding Love: Raising Awareness on Domestic and Dating Violence Against Lesbians and Transwomen in the European Union . The most heartfelt thanks go to the survivors of domestic and dating violence, law enforcement agencies, health and legal professionals who kindly agreed to share their much valued and intense experiences. Thanks and appreciation go to all the partners, volunteers and participants in the project Bleeding Love : Anna Lorenzetti,
    [Show full text]
  • Failing to Protect: the UN and the Politicization of Human Rights
    www.ebook3000.com www.ebook3000.com FAILING TO PROTECT www.ebook3000.com www.ebook3000.com ROSA FREEDMAN Failing to Protect The UN and the Politicisation of Human Rights A www.ebook3000.com A Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Copyright © Rosa Freedman, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Freedman, Rosa Failing to Protect The UN and the Politicization of Human Rights ISBN 978-0-19-022254-3 Printed in India on acid-free paper www.ebook3000.com For Andrew (and Alfie) www.ebook3000.com www.ebook3000.com CONTENTS Acknowledgements ix Author’s Note xi Prologue xiii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Povorka Ponosa U Splitu: Longitudinalna Analiza Novinskih Objava 2011.-2015
    Povorka ponosa u Splitu: longitudinalna analiza novinskih objava 2011.-2015. Knezović, Matea Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2016 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, The Faculty of Political Science / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Fakultet političkih znanosti Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:114:431790 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-02 Repository / Repozitorij: FPSZG repository - master's thesis of students of political science and journalism / postgraduate specialist studies / disertations Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva Matea Knezović POVORKA PONOSA U SPLITU: LONGITUDINALNA ANALIZA NOVINSKIH OBJAVA 2011. – 2015. DIPLOMSKI RAD Zagreb, 2016. Sveučilište u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Diplomski studij novinarstva POVORKA PONOSA U SPLITU: LONGITUDINALNA ANALIZA NOVINSKIH OBJAVA 2011. – 2015. DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentor: izvr. prof. dr. sc. Gordana Vilović Studentica: Matea Knezović Zagreb lipanj, 2016. Izjavljujem da sam diplomski rad Povorka ponosa u Splitu: longitudinalna analiza novinskih objava 2011. – 2015., koji sam predala na ocjenu mentoru izvr. prof. dr. sc. Gordani Vilović, napisala samostalno i da je u potpunosti riječ o mojem autorskom radu. Također, izjavljujem da dotični rad nije objavljen ni korišten u svrhe ispunjenja nastavnih obaveza na ovom ili nekom drugom učilištu, te da na temelju njega nisam stekla ECTS-bodove. Nadalje, izjavljujem da sam u radu
    [Show full text]
  • (GAY) in SOUTHEAST EUROPE: LGBTI RIGHTS in a EUROPEAN-GLOBAL CORNER by Susan C
    “GEJ” (GAY) IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE: LGBTI RIGHTS IN A EUROPEAN-GLOBAL CORNER BY Susan C. Pearce Department of Sociology, East Carolina University Global Europe Program 0 “Gej” (Gay) in Southeast Europe: LGBTI Rights in a European-Global Corner Policy Brief for the Global Europe Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars February 2014 Susan C. Pearce, PhD Department of Sociology, East Carolina University, E. Fifth Street, Greenville, NC 27858 [email protected] 1 In September of 2013, European Union representatives and other European political leaders admonished Serbian political officials for canceling a Gay Pride parade planned for Belgrade, for a third year in a row. Each year, Serbia’s Ministry of Internal Affairs refused permission to hold the parade due to security concerns, and also banned anti-gay right-wing groups from gathering.1 Previous Pride events in Serbia, as well as in neighboring Southeast European countries, had met with violent demonstrations by crowds many times the size of the Pride events. In 2010, for example, 9,000 Serbs had descended on Belgrade from across the country to protest an LGBTI parade, violently rampaging the city and destroying property.2 Because the recent cancellation occurred in the midst of Serbia’s candidate phase of courtship for European Union membership, and the country’s record on minority protections is critical to the agreements, EU negotiators view the parade cancellation as a red flag. In 2014, Serbia is one of seven Southeast European countries in various stages of negotiation for European Union membership, along with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Kosovo, FYR (Former Yugoslav Republic) Macedonia, Montenegro, and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • The West's Turkey Conundrum
    THE NEW GEOPOLITICS FEBRUARY 2018 EUROPE THE WEST’S TURKEY CONUNDRUM AMANDA SLOAT BROOKINGS – ROBERT BOSCH FOUNDATION TRANSATLANTIC INITIATIVE THE WEST’S TURKEY CONUNDRUM AMANDA SLOAT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Policymakers in the United States and European Union are struggling with how to manage their relations with Turkey. What makes the country such a conundrum is that its problematic leadership faces real threats. Turkey is confronting challenges from the aftermath of the July 2016 coup attempt and the destabilizing effects of the Syrian war. Yet the country’s president is growing more authoritarian, using virulent anti-Western rhetoric, and making foreign policy choices contrary to the interests of the trans-Atlantic alliance. The policy goal is navigating this gray zone today to preserve the possibility of better relations in the future. The paper begins by examining the main domestic and regional challenges facing Turkey, as well as how these issues impact the country’s relations with its Western allies. It then outlines three possible policy responses for the United States and Europe: abandonment, transactionalism, and engagement. The paper makes the case for taking a long view, as the current period before Turkey’s parliamentary and presidential elections (due sometime before November 2019) will remain difficult. The degree of political, security, socio-economic, and cultural integration between Turkey and the West requires a nuanced and supple style of relationship management. Specifically, the paper advocates for constructive and principled engagement. This entails widening the aperture of government outreach to more officials on a broader range of shared interests; using the prospect of deeper trade and investment links to encourage better governance; expanding people-to-people ties and supporting civil society; and staying true to Western values by speaking out about rule of law and human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • International Association of Pride Organizers
    International Association of Pride Organizers 2017 Annual Report 2012 Annual Report InterPride Inc. – International Association of Pride Organizers Founded in 1982, InterPride is the world’s largest organization for organizers of Pride events. InterPride is incorporated in the State of Texas in the USA and is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization under US law. It is funded by membership dues, sponsorship, merchandise sales and donations from individuals and organizations. OUR VISION A world where there is full cultural, social and legal equality for all. OUR MISSION Empowering Pride Organizations Worldwide. OUR WORK We promote Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride on an international level, to increase networking and communication among Pride Organizations and to encourage diverse communities to hold and attend Pride events and to act as a source of education. InterPride accomplishes it mission with Regional Conferences and an Annual General Meeting and World Conference. At the annual conference, InterPride members network and collaborate on an international scale and take care of the business of the organization. InterPride is a voice for the LGBTI community around the world. We stand up for inequality and fight injustice everywhere. Our member organizations share the latest news so that can react internationally and make a difference. Regional Director reports contained within this Annual Report are the words, personal accounts and opinions of the authors involved and do not necessarily reflect the views of InterPride as an organization. InterPride accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of material contained within. InterPride may be contacted via email [email protected] or via our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    Annual Report 2013/14 EPOA · ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14 Welcome to EPOA! EPOA, the European Pride Organisers Association, had a difficult working year. It is not a secret that maintaining a cross-border non-profit organisation with limited financial means is a daunting task. Add to the mix some new faces and new ideas and fireworks are guaranteed. Unfortunately some of the board members have left us half way through the working year for all sorts of different reasons. But looking back at some of the challenges we came across, it has to be said that the board and its vision has come out even stronger. So with the remaining board members we obviously ensured the proper functioning of the organisation but foremost lined ourselves up towards a better organisa- tion for the future. EPOA, through its members, has an enormous potential for A lot of preparatory work was done towards improving EPOA the future, a reason why we are really actively looking to grow as a whole: search for new members, defining internal proce- this organisation. We are the voice of many LGBTIQ lobby dures, focus on our members’ needs and moving our Euro- groups and that voice should be heard! EuroPride is also a Pride event and its brand to the next level. powerful tool in order towards that same goal. But by bring- ing more members to the table, we will also be able to gener- Talking about EuroPride; we were thrilled with the fantastic ate more energy, more ideas, more support and why not an event our member Oslo Pride put on this year.
    [Show full text]