Human Rights Do Not Recognize Political Ideology!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Political Ideas and Movements That Created the Modern World
harri+b.cov 27/5/03 4:15 pm Page 1 UNDERSTANDINGPOLITICS Understanding RITTEN with the A2 component of the GCE WGovernment and Politics A level in mind, this book is a comprehensive introduction to the political ideas and movements that created the modern world. Underpinned by the work of major thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, Marx, Mill, Weber and others, the first half of the book looks at core political concepts including the British and European political issues state and sovereignty, the nation, democracy, representation and legitimacy, freedom, equality and rights, obligation and citizenship. The role of ideology in modern politics and society is also discussed. The second half of the book addresses established ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism and Nationalism, before moving on to more recent movements such as Environmentalism and Ecologism, Fascism, and Feminism. The subject is covered in a clear, accessible style, including Understanding a number of student-friendly features, such as chapter summaries, key points to consider, definitions and tips for further sources of information. There is a definite need for a text of this kind. It will be invaluable for students of Government and Politics on introductory courses, whether they be A level candidates or undergraduates. political ideas KEVIN HARRISON IS A LECTURER IN POLITICS AND HISTORY AT MANCHESTER COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY. HE IS ALSO AN ASSOCIATE McNAUGHTON LECTURER IN SOCIAL SCIENCES WITH THE OPEN UNIVERSITY. HE HAS WRITTEN ARTICLES ON POLITICS AND HISTORY AND IS JOINT AUTHOR, WITH TONY BOYD, OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION: EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION? and TONY BOYD WAS FORMERLY HEAD OF GENERAL STUDIES AT XAVERIAN VI FORM COLLEGE, MANCHESTER, WHERE HE TAUGHT POLITICS AND HISTORY. -
Report Monitoring of Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Selected OSCE Participating States (May 2011 – June 2012)
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Report Monitoring of Freedom of Peaceful Assembly in Selected OSCE Participating States (May 2011 – June 2012) Warsaw 9 November 2012 Freedom of Assembly in the OSCE Area Page 3 OSCE/ODIHR Report TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 7 CONSOLIDATED RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 12 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 17 ODIHR’s work on the freedom of peaceful assembly and background to the report 17 ODIHR’s mandate .................................................................................................... 18 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 18 Structure of the report ............................................................................................... 21 SECTION I: RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES ............................................................................................... 22 NOTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS............................... 22 Notification and authorization requirements for assemblies – international standards and good practice .................................................................................... -
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. -
Croatia 07/2018
Monitoring Implementation of the Council of Europe Recommendation to the member states on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity CM/Rec(2010)5 DOCUMENTATION REPORT ON THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA 07/2018 Prepared by ZAGREB PRIDE web: www.zagreb-pride.net email: [email protected] ++385(0)1 580 65 60 Skype: zagrebpride Social media: @zagrebpride _________ TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 About Zagreb Pride 4 About the Report 4 Political System and Demographics 4 Executive Summary 5 Methodology 8 Acknowledgements 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 10 Section 1 – Implementation of the Recommendation 18 Section 2 – Implementation of the specific provisions in the Appendix 21 2.1. Right to life, security and protection from violence 21 2.1.A. “Hate crimes” and other hate-motivated incidents 21 2.1.A.1 Hate crime legislation 21 2.1.A.2 Underreporting of homophobic and transphobic hate crimes 22 2.1.A.3 Documenting and reporting hate crimes 24 2.1.A.4. Zagreb Pride’s compiled data on hate crimes 25 2.1.A.5. Hate crimes – case studies 27 2.1.B. “Hate speech” 31 2.1.B.1. Hate speech – case studies 33 2.2. Freedom of association 38 2.3. Freedom of expression and peaceful assembly 41 2.4. Right to respect for private and family life 46 2.4.1. Legal gender recognition 46 2.4.2. Legal recognition of same sex couples 47 2.4.3. Institutional and political discrimination of same-sex life partners 48 2.4.4. Discrimination of informal same-sex life partners – case studies 50 2.4.5. -
The Nuclear Debate Within the EU - EU Member States for Or Against - a Status Report*
The Nuclear Debate within the EU - EU Member States For or Against - A Status Report* Colour Key Pro Nuclear Power Divided Against Nuclear Power Current or Country Planned In Favour Against Comment (Reactors = TWh) Construction of NPP NPP % of electricity Y/N Czech Republic Y In July 2008, CEZ announced a plan to build two more reactors at Temelín, with construction (6 = 26.7 TWh) Temelin to start in 2013 and commissioning of the first unit in 2020. In March 2010, CEZ announced that discussions had begun with three vendor groups prior to the bid submission: a 26.7% 2 reactors consortium led by Westinghouse; a consortium of Škoda JS, Atomstroyexport, and OKB Gidropress; and France’s AREVA. In February 2011, the final delivery date was shifted to 2025. In October 2011 CEZ asked for tenders from three companies (AREVA, Westinghouse and Atomstroyexport with Skoda) for a turnkey contract for the construction of two units plus nine years’ worth of fuel. The bids were due in July 2012, with contracts to be signed in late 2013. CEZ is reported to be considering seeking an outside investor, for $10 billion, for the project. CEZ stated in May 2012, that “the partnership will probably be formed after the contract with the selected supplier is signed, which is expected to happen in 2013”. Finland Y The Olkiluoto 3 (OL3) project (AREVA) is about five years behind schedule and 100% over (4 = 22.3 TWh) Olkiluoto-3 & budget. The problems produced by the OL3 project have not prevented TVO from filing an application, in April 2008, for a decision-in-principle to develop “OL4”, a 1–1.8 GW reactor 31.6% 4 to start construction in 2012 and enter operation “in the late 2010s”. -
2021 Rule of Law Report - Targeted Stakeholder Consultation
2021 Rule of Law Report - targeted stakeholder consultation Submission by ILGA-Europe and member organisations Arcigay & Certi Diritti (Italy); Bilitis, GLAS Foundation & Deystvie (Bulgaria); Çavaria (Belgium - Flanders); Háttér Társaság (Hungary); Legebrita (Slovenia); PROUD (Czech Republic); RFSL (Sweden) and Zagreb Pride (Croatia). ILGA-Europe are an independent, international LGBTI rights non-governmental umbrella organisation bringing together over 600 organisations from 54 countries in Europe and Central Asia. We are part of the wider international ILGA organisation, but ILGA-Europe were established as a separate region of ILGA and an independent legal entity in 1996. ILGA itself was created in 1978. https://www.ilga-europe.org/who- we-are/what-ilga-europe Contents Horizontal developments ........................................................................................................................ 2 Belgium ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Czech Republic ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Hungary -
Download File
SNAPSHOT The latest updates from the team at FTI Consulting in Brussels Giving you insight to what is on Europe’s political agenda Brexit and the European Parliament. What to expect? February 2020 With the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union (EU), 73 British MEPs have now departed the European Parliament. Some of these seats are being redistributed, while others will remain unfilled. How could this affect the equilibrium between the political groups in the European Parliament? How could policymaking in priority areas for the next five years be affected: notably the Green Deal, the Digital Agenda and Economic EU Sovereignty? Crunching the numbers So who wins and loses? It’s not a straightforward process as The total number of MEPs will drop from 751 to 705. Of the some groups lose their British MEPs but gain with the 73 vacated seats, 27 have been redistributed to other redistribution, meaning tone and priorities could be changing Member States and political groups. 46 are not being beyond just the total number of overall seats each group has. assigned and will be made available either for future EU enlargements; or for the potential creation of transnational Which groups have lost their British seats? Nigel Farage’s lists (with a pan Union constituency). Brexit Party, who were not affiliated, represent the biggest total number of former British MEPs, with twenty-seven now The seats are being proportionately re-distributed among 14 leaving the chamber. Renew Europe (RE), the former ALDE, Member States (see Figure 1 below), based on the 2019 representing the central liberals, is next with the departure elections. -
International Social Survey Program: Role of Government III, 1996
ICPSR Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research International Social Survey Program: Role of Government III, 1996 Codebook International Social Survey Program (ISSP) ICPSR 2808 INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SURVEY PROGRAM: ROLE OF GOVERNMENT III, 1996 (ICPSR 2808) Codebook Principal Investigator International Social Survey Program (ISSP) First ICPSR Release October 1999 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: International Social Survey Program (ISSP). INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SURVEY PROGRAM: ROLE OF GOVERNMENT III, 1996 [Computer file]. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung [producer], 1999. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON USE OF ICPSR RESOURCES To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript -
OUTSPOKEN Human Rights for Everyone
OUTSPOKEN Human Rights for Everyone. Everywhere. International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission • October 2006 IGLHRC WORKS ON BEHALF OF DETAINEES IN CAMEROON On May 21, 2005, Cameroonian The arrests of young men at the bar were fi rst reported by the local law enforcement agents stormed newspaper and soon were picked up by national and local TV stations, which an outdoor nightclub popular aired images of the detainees being paraded in front of television cameras with the local gay and lesbian shortly after their arrest. The case garnered signifi cant publicity nationally community in the Cameroonian and caused pain and embarrassment for the men and their families. capital, Yaoundé, and arrested several dozen people. Over the Within days after their arrests, IGLHRC’s Africa Specialist, Cary Johnson, next few days, most of those issued a statement to alert the international community of the crackdown arrested were able to negotiate in Cameroon. The announcement was followed by a letter-writing campaign for their freedom, but 11 of on behalf of the detainees, co-sponsored by “Behind the Mask”, a South Some of the Cameroon Detainees and the arrestees, all young men Africa-based regional LGBT media and human rights organization. IGLHRC human rights defender Alice Nkom between the ages of 17 and also found a local attorney to take the case and provided legal assistance 35 with few resources, were while the men were detained. The attorney, Mr. Duga Titanji, successfully charged with “homosexuality” and sent to the notorious Kondengui Prison. petitioned for the youngest man, only 17 at the time of his arrest, to be transferred into a juvenile facility. -
Investing in Destabilisation: How Foreign Money Is Used to Undermine Democracy in the EU
STUDY Requested by the INGE committee Investing in destabilisation: How foreign money is used to undermine democracy in the EU @Adobe Stock Author: Edoardo BRESSANELLI (Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies) European Parliament Coordinator: Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union EN PE 653.631 - April 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY Investing in destabilisation: How foreign money is used to undermine democracy in the EU ABSTRACT Foreign interference has become a major security threat for democracies. The European Union (EU) provides no exception and, in the last few years, has significantly stepped up its efforts to counter this threat. A specific type of foreign interference is the foreign funding of political parties. At the national level, regulations banning or limiting foreign funding are currently in place in most member states, but there is still significant variation across them. At the EU level, the recent reforms of the regulation on the funding of the Europarties and their associated foundations have banned contributions from abroad. Notwithstanding such welcome changes to party regulations, cases of foreign funding are still being reported in several member states, with foreign actors exploiting regulatory loopholes to channel funds or provide other types of support. To tackle this issue more effectively, regulatory convergence at the national level should be promoted, the transparency of party accounts should be enhanced, and the monitoring and sanctioning powers of the relevant control authorities strengthened. EP/EXPO/INGE/2020/01 EN April 2021 - PE 653.631 © European Union, 2021 AUTHOR • Edoardo BRESSANELLI, Assistant Professor, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy This study was originally requested by the European Parliament's Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union, including Disinformation. -
M I N U T E S
1 / 7 Internationale Kommission für Alpines Rettungswesen IKAR Commission Internationale du Sauvetage Alpin CISA International Commission for Alpine Rescue ICAR 64. Delegiertenversammlung 64ème Assemblée des délégués 64th Assembly of delegates 6. Oktober / Octobre / October 2012 Krynica, Poland M I N U T E S 1. Welcome President Gerold Biner welcomes the delegates to the 64th Assembly of Delegates. He is asking the delegates to stand in memory of mountain rescuers who have passed away this past year; especially the former member of the ICAR Executive Committee Emmanuel Schmutz. Excused for the assembly are: - Hans-Jürg Etter - Reinhard Dörflinger - Pierre Blanc - Dr. Urs Wieget A special welcome goes to the honorary members: - Nils Farlund - Louis Salzmann - Toni Grab - Michael Swangard There are 3 amendments to today’s agenda: - Item 6: Acceptance and exclusion of B and C members. The following items are added: • 6.7 University of Saragossa CUEMUM (university specialization courses in mountain emergency medicine), B member • 6.8 Society of Mountain Medicine Canada, B member - Item 7: Elections. Since there are elections pending for board members, the following item is added: • 7.0 Reelection of current members of the executive committee and commissions. No requests to speak. The Assembly of Delegates approves the new agenda. Air Zermatt AG, Postfach CH – 3920 Zermatt Switzerland +41 27 966 86 86 www.ikar-cisa.org [email protected] 2 / 7 2. Roll Call, Appointing Office There are 31 A and 15 B members represented at the Assembly. The Assembly has a total of 77 votes. Hans-Martin Henny and Volker Lischke are appointed to count the votes. -
Queer Migration in & out of Croatia: Waitressing Is an Awful Job When
Queer migration in & out of Croatia: Waitressing is an awful job when you’re gay in a straight bar1 Amir Hodžić, Independent Scholar Starting point: Zrinjevac Park, 10 000 Zagreb The park on Nikola Šubić Zrinski Square, colloquially called Zrinjevac, is the oldest promenade in downtown Zagreb. Since 1872 many significant social and cultural events have taken place there. On June 29th 2002, another historical public gathering was held in Zrinjevac, the 1st Zagreb Pride. That day, around 300 participants marched through the city centre heavily guarded by the police. That did not stop numerous insults coming from both “ordinary” citizens and organized groups of young neo-fascists and skinheads who managed to throw tear gas at the parade and beat up around 30 Pride participants. While 27 people were arrested, no one was ever charged with assault or discrimination. At the turn of the century, in Croatia, more precisely in Zagreb, the growth and integration of the queer community/movement was enabled partly by the changes after the 2000s elections,2 and partly by the development of Internet forums. The year 2002 marks the increased visibility of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/Transexual, Intersex and Queer (LGBTTIQ) community and movement in Croatia, and the beginning of more intense lobbying and advocacy for the rights of “sexual and gender minorities” within the Croatian legal system. The same year, LORI, a lesbian organization from Rijeka, implemented the 1st national campaign for the promotion of LGBTTIQ rights. The campaign included a TV clip Love is Love, which was banned by national television as “inappropriate”.