A Comparative Taxonomy and Survey of Public Cloud Infrastructure Vendors Dimitrios Sikeridis, Ioannis Papapanagiotou, Bhaskar Prasad Rimal, and Michael Devetsikiotis
1 A Comparative Taxonomy and Survey of Public Cloud Infrastructure Vendors Dimitrios Sikeridis, Ioannis Papapanagiotou, Bhaskar Prasad Rimal, and Michael Devetsikiotis Abstract—An increasing number of technology enterprises started renting the capacity of their data centers to companies are adopting cloud-native architectures to offer their web-based and individuals around the world [4]. By doing that, they products, by moving away from privately-owned data-centers provided efficient and scalable computing centers that other and relying exclusively on cloud service providers. As a result, cloud vendors have lately increased, along with the estimated companies could not develop or maintain on their own. This annual revenue they share. However, in the process of selecting combination of low-cost (zero installation and maintenance a provider’s cloud service over the competition, we observe costs) and high-performance (high-end supercomputers with a lack of universal common ground in terms of terminology, unlimited memory capabilities) was quickly accompanied with functionality of services and billing models. This is an important other advantages, including minimal cost of software, unlim- gap especially under the new reality of the industry where each cloud provider has moved towards his own service taxonomy, ited storage capacity, data reliability, universal data access while the number of specialized services has grown exponentially. and multiple user collaboration. Therefore, the transition to This work discusses cloud services offered by four dominant, in cloud based services became a viable solution for the majority terms of their current market share, cloud vendors. We provide of technology companies and a must for any new start-up.
[Show full text]