International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Review Review Revisiting Ionic Liquid Structure-Property Relationship: A Critical Analysis Relationship: A Critical Analysis Wagner Silva 1 , Marcileia Zanatta 2 , Ana Sofia Ferreira 1 , Marta C. Corvo 2 and EuricoWagner J. Silva Cabrita 1, Marcileia1,* Zanatta 2, Ana Sofia Ferreira 1, Marta C. Corvo 2 and Eurico J. Cabrita 1,* 1 UCIBIO,UCIBIO, Chemistry Chemistry Department, Department, School School of of Science Science and and Technology, Technology, NOVA NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-5162829-516 Caparica, Caparica, Portugal; Portugal; [email protected] [email protected] (W.S.); (W.S.); asd.ferreira@ [email protected] (A.S.F.) (A.S.F.) 2 2 i3N|Cenimat,i3N|Cenimat, Materials Materials Science Science Department, Department, School School of of Science Science and and Technology, Technology, NOVA UniversityUniversity Lisbon,Lisbon, 2829-5162829-516 Caparica, Caparica, Portugal; Portugal; [email protected] [email protected] (M.Z.); (M.Z.); [email protected] [email protected] (M.C.C.) (M.C.C.) ** Correspondence:Correspondence: [email protected] [email protected] Received: 2 October 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 19 19 October October 2020 2020
Abstract: In the the last last few few years, years, ionic ionic liquids liquids (ILs) (ILs) have have been been the the focus focus of of extensive extensive studies studies concerning concerning the relationship between structure structure and and properties properties and and how how this this impacts impacts their their application. application. Despite Despite a alarge large number number of of studies, studies, several several topics topics remain remain controversial controversial or or not not fully answered, such as:as: the existence of ion ion pairs, pairs, the the concept concept of of free free volume volume and and the the effect effect of ofwater water and and its implications its implications in the in themodulation modulation of ILs of physicochemical ILs physicochemical properties. properties. In this Inpaper, this paper,we present wepresent a critical a review critical of review state-of- of state-of-the-artthe-art literature literature regarding regarding structure–property structure–property relationship relationship of ILs, we of re-examine ILs, we re-examine analytical analytical theories theorieson the structure–property on the structure–property correlations correlations and present and new present perspectives new perspectives based on basedthe existing on the data. existing The data.interrelation The interrelation between betweentransport transport properties properties (viscosity, (viscosity, diffusion, diff usion,conductivi conductivity)ty) of IL ofstructure IL structure and andfree freevolume volume are analysed are analysed and anddiscussed discussed at a atmolecu a molecularlar level. level. In addition, In addition, we demonstrate we demonstrate how how the theanalysis analysis of microscopic of microscopic features features (particularly (particularly using using NMR-derived NMR-derived da data)ta) can can be be used used to to explain explain and predict macroscopic properties, reachingreaching newnew perspectivesperspectives onon thethe propertiesproperties andand application of ILs.
Keywords: ionicionic liquid; liquid; supramolecular supramolecular organization; organization; free volume; water; ion pair; physicochemical physicochemical properties; transporttransport propertiesproperties
1. Introduction Ionic LiquidsLiquids (ILs) (ILs) are are organic organic salts salts that meltthat commonlymelt commonly below 100below◦C, therefore100 °C, theytherefore are constituted they are entirelyconstituted by charged entirely species,by charged usually species, an organic usually cation an organic and an cation organic and or inorganican organic anion. or inorganic The extensive anion. 6 18 amountThe extensive of possible amount combinations of possible ofcombinat knownions cations of known and anions cations (10 and–10 anions)[1], (10 results6–1018 in) di[1],ff erentresults and in uniquedifferent physicochemical and unique physicochemical properties such properties as high thermalsuch as high stability, thermal large stabilit electrochemicaly, large electrochemical window and lowwindow vapor and pressure. low vapor Because pressure. of these Because attractive of these properties, attractive ILs properties, have garnered ILs have industrial garnered and industrial scientific interest,and scientific see Figure interest,1[2, 3see]. Figure 1 [2,3].
Figure 1. Typical ions in ionic liquids (ILs).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. Sci. 20202020,, 2121,, x; 7745; doi: doi: FOR10.3390 PEER/ ijms21207745REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/ijmswww.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 2 of 37 Int.Int. J.J. Mol.Mol. Sci.Sci. 2020,, 21,, xx FORFOR PEERPEER REVIEWREVIEW 2 2 of of 37 37
The tunability and and versatility versatility of of ILs ILs have have given given rise rise to toseveral several applications applications such such as solvents as solvents for for synthesis and catalysis [4,5] CO capture and storage [6–8] energy generation and storage [9], synthesis and catalysis [4,5] CO22 capturecapture2 andand storagestorage [6–8][6–8] energyenergy generationgeneration andand storagestorage [9],[9], extractionextraction/dissolution/dissolution ofof biomassbiomass [[10,11],10,11], andand activeactive pharmaceuticalpharmaceutical ingredientsingredients [[12,13].12,13]. ILsILs areare normallynormally divideddivided intointo twotwo classes:classes:classes: aprotic aprotic ionic ionic liquids liquids (APILs) (APILs) and and proticprotic ionicionic liquidsliquids (PILs).(PILs). PILsPILs areare formed formed by by the the transfer transfer of of protons protons from from BrønstedBrønsted acid acid toto BrønstedBrønsted base,base, thisthis protonproton transfertransfer doesdoesdoes not notnot take taketake place placeplace in AILSinin AILSAILS due duedue to the toto nature thethe nana oftureture the of ionsof thethe constituting ionsions constituconstitu thetingting salt. the PILsthe salt.salt. are generallyPILsPILs areare preparedgenerally throughprepared a neutralization through a neutralization reaction and APILsreaction by aand quaternization APILs by reactiona quaternization followed byreaction anion exchange,followedfollowed byby Figure anionanion2[ 14exchange,exchange,,15]. FigureFigure 22 [14,15].[14,15].
Figure 2. TypicalTypical synthetic route of a protic ionic liquid (PIL) ( A)) ethylammoniumethylammonium nitrate nitrate and and an an APIL APIL ((BB)) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium1-ethyl-3-methylimidazoli1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate.tetrafluoroborate.
The first first IL reported in the literature is a contro controversialversial matter. Most authors state that the history starts withwith Paul Paul Walden’s Walden’s discovery discovery in 1914 in with 1914 the reportwith ofthe ethylammonium report of ethylammonium nitrate ([EtNH 3][NOnitrate3]) synthesis,([EtNH([EtNH33][NO][NO see33])]) Figure synthesis,synthesis,3[ 16 see];see however, FigureFigure 33 some [16];[16]; however,however, authors attribute somesome authorsauthors the first attributeattribute IL to Gabriel thethe firstfirst and ILIL to Weinerto GabrielGabriel in 1888and Weiner [17], with in 1888 the synthesis [17], with of the ethanolammonium synthesis of ethanolammonium nitrate. This confusion nitrate. This arises confusionconfusion from the arisesarises reported fromfrom meltingthethe reportedreported point, meltingmelting while Walden’s point,point, whilewhile compound Walden’sWalden’s was compoundcompound characterized waswaswith characterizedcharacterized a melting with pointwith aa of meltingmelting 13–14 ◦ pointpointC, Gabriel’s ofof 13–13– compound14 °C, Gabriel’s exhibited compound a melting exhibited point of a 50 melting◦C, substantially point of 50 higher °C, substantially than room temperature. higher than Theseroom workstemperature.temperature. marked TheseThese the beginning worksworks markedmarked of the thethe First beginningbeginning Generation ofof ofththe ILs. First Cations Generation of the of first ILs. generation Cations of of the ILs first are characterizedgeneration of byILs large are volumes,characterized such asby 1,3-dialkyl-imidazolium large volumes, such as or 1,3-dialkyl-imidazolium 1-alkylpyridinium and anionsor 1- +3 basedalkylpyridinium mostly on halogen and anions aluminate based (Al mostly)[1 ,18on]. halogen The disadvantage aluminate of (Al this+3+3)) generation [1,18].[1,18]. TheThe was disadvantagedisadvantage the instability ofof inthisthis relation generationgeneration to air waswas and thethe water. instabilityinstability inin relationrelation toto airair andand water.water.
Figure 3. Generations of ILs through time.
The introduction of the Second Generation ofof ILsILs comescomes withwith thethe preparationpreparation ofof airair andand waterwater stable ILs, reported in 1992 by Wilkes and Zaworotko [19], based on the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium − − − cation and alternative anions, [CH33CO22]]−,, [NO[NO33]]− andand [BF[BF44]]−,, seesee FigureFigure 3.3. ILsILs fromfrom thethe secondsecond
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 3 of 37
The introduction of the Second Generation of ILs comes with the preparation of air and water stable ILs, reported in 1992 by Wilkes and Zaworotko [19], based on the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium cation and alternative anions, [CH3CO2]−, [NO3]− and [BF4]−, see Figure3. ILs from the second generation are much easier to handle than those of the first generation. It was due to this fact and their particular properties, that IL-based research has become one of the major scientific topics over the last 25 years [20]. During the first decade after the publication of Wilkes and Zaworotko [19], solid scientific background was built on the subject of ILs and specific applications started to be targeted. In Ann Visser’s paper, a series of functionalized imidazolium-based ILs was synthesized to extract heavy metals, Hg+2 and Cd+2 from aqueous solutions [21,22], and the terminology “Task-Specific” was introduced in connection to IL applications. Tuneable physical and chemical properties according to the desired application are what defines the Third Generation of ILs, see Figure3. Among these properties, rationally selected biological action is already a reality, as evidenced by Hough’s review [23] where several ILs candidates were used as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) or precursors. As ILs applications matured, a detailed understanding and predictive capabilities towards their thermophysical properties have become progressively more important. Since the introduction of the second generation of ILs, this class of compounds was brought to trend topics in the scientific world, and several works correlating structure and properties have been published. However, many issues are still the subject of intensive investigation, such as the existence of ion pairs, the definition of ionicity, the structuring of water inside the ILs and the mechanism of diffusion, and mainly the relationship between the free volume and transport properties. Therefore, this review presents a rationalization of IL properties starting from the classical chemical structure-property relationship generally described in the literature, followed by a detailed discussion analysing the reasons for their properties, starting from the smaller scale towards higher degrees of complexity, i.e., going from the microstructures to higher organized aggregates and solvent effect. The physicochemical properties of the second generation of ILs are revised and correlated to free volume theory for the first time. In addition, the application of NMR to determine these properties is highlighted.
2. Structure–Property Relationships The widespread application of ILs has motivated the need for a detailed understanding of these materials, to rationalize and predict their behaviour. Their tunability reinforces the necessity for a predictive capability towards their thermophysical properties and motivates the efforts to resolve the molecular-scale details of structure, dynamics, and interactions in ILs. Several reviews on structure–property relationships for ILs fundamental thermal and physicochemical bulk properties can be found in the literature [24–27]. The predictive methodologies generically consider either empirical or theoretical approaches for representing properties such as density, surface tension, sound velocity, heat capacity, melting points, and electrical conductivity [28–31]. Empirical approaches correlate IL properties with their respective structure. Among the transport properties of ILs, viscosity is one of the most studied because of its importance to electrochemical and separating applications. IL viscosities usually vary between 20 and 40,000 cP, which is 1 order of magnitude higher than that of conventional solvents, such as water, with a viscosity of ~1 cP. A general trend is that the viscosity decreases with the increasing size of ions, with a greater dependence on the anion. For cations, the viscosity increases with the increasing length of the alkyl chains partially due to stronger van der Waals (VDW) interactions. A relationship between the viscosity and the symmetry of the cations was also disclosed, with asymmetric cations exhibiting linear correlations opposing the small and symmetric cations. Besides the size and shape of ions, viscosity is also closely related to intermolecular interactions. High interaction energy, due to electrostatic forces and VDW interactions between anion and cation, leads to higher viscosity. Additionally, viscosity also correlates with ion stacking caused by hydrogen bonding, with smaller interactions leading to lower viscosity, and with the delocalization of the charge on the anion that weakens the hydrogen bond, and consequently Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 4 of 37 decreases the viscosity. Conductivity is also frequently studied and lays within the range of 0.1–30 m.S 1 cmInt.− J.. Mol. At Sci. low 2020 temperatures,, 21, x FOR PEER the REVIEW structures of cations and anions influence the conductivity of ILs. 4 of The 37 conductivity usually decreases with the increasing length of alkyl chains of cations, and the anions haveincreasing a more length significant of alkyl effect chains on the of conductivity,cations, and withthe anions a higher have influence a more ofsignificant the charge effect distribution on the andconductivity, the number with of chargea higher carriers influence [32]. of the charge distribution and the number of charge carriers [32].The group led by Watanabe from Yokohama National University [33–36], published a series of articlesThe with group some led of by the Watanabe first correlations from Yokohama between Nation IL structureal University and properties. [33–36], published These publications a series of highlightedarticles with the some relationship of the first between correlations the betw ioniceen di ffILusivity, structure viscosity, and properties. and molar These conductivity publications for dihighlightedfferent cationic the relationship and anionic between structures. the The ionic first diffusivity, publication viscosity, in 2004 and [33] reportsmolar conductivity the study of for the different cationic and anionic structures.+ The first publication in 2004 [33] reports the study of the 1- 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C4mim] ) cation with different fluorinated anions ([NTF2]−, [OTF]−, butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C4mim]+) cation with different fluorinated anions ([NTF₂]−, [OTF]−, [PF6]−, [CF3CO2]−, [BF4]−). Through self-diffusion and conductivity experiments, it was found that the [PF₆]−, [CF₃CO₂]−, [BF₄]−). Through self-diffusion and conductivity experiments, it was found that the high rate of ions contributing to the ionic conductivity within the diffusion component is related to the high rate of ions contributing to the ionic conductivity within the diffusion component is related to poor interaction of the anion with the cation. The electronegative fluorine atoms and perfluorosulfonyl the poor interaction of the anion with the cation. The electronegative fluorine atoms and groups in the anion contribute to the distribution of the anionic charge in phosphate, borate and imide, perfluorosulfonyl groups in the anion contribute to the distribution of the anionic charge in respectively. This study concerned only anion effects. In this way, diffusive species in the IL that phosphate, borate and imide, respectively. This study concerned only anion effects. In this way, contribute to the ionic conduction depend only on the anion character. With these results, it is evident diffusive species in the IL that contribute to the ionic conduction depend only on the anion character. that the size, shape and geometry of the anion determine the strength of the electrostatic interaction With these results, it is evident that the size, shape and geometry of the anion determine the strength between the cation and the anion (Figure4). Moreover, the proximity between the ions also enables of the electrostatic interaction between the cation and the anion (Figure 4). Moreover, the proximity hydrogen bonds between the fluorine atoms of the anion and the cation protons. These factors justify between the ions also enables hydrogen bonds between the fluorine atoms of the anion and the cation the higher viscosity and lower conductivity observed for [C4mim][PF6]. protons. These factors justify the higher viscosity and lower conductivity observed for [C4mim][PF6].
FigureFigure 4. 4.Anion Anion dependencedependence ofof electricalelectrical conductivity ( (σσ),), viscosity viscosity ( (ηη),), self-diffusion self-diffusion (D (D) )and and molar molar concentration (M) for [C4mim][X] at 298K and 0.1MPa. The diffusion coefficient presented is the result concentration (M) for [C4mim][X] at 298K and 0.1MPa. The diffusion coefficient presented is the result ofof the the sum sum ofof cationcation andand anionanion self-diself-diffusion.ffusion. Image created using using data data published published in in references references [33,36]. [33,36].
InIn 2005,2005, anotheranother publication focused focused on on the the cation cation structure, structure, where where the the alkyl alkyl chain chain length length of 1- of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazoliumalkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethane bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide sulfonyl)imide ([C ([Cnnmim][NTFmim][NTF₂])2]) was was varied varied (n (n == 1,1, 2,2, 4, 4, 6, 6, 8) 8) to to study study the the ILs ILs properties properties over over a wide a wi temperaturede temperature range range [34]. [34]. The The increase increase in the in alkyl the alkyl chain lengthchain length was found was found to cause to changescause changes in the in interaction the interaction forces forces (VDW). (VDW). The propertiesThe properties of the of ILs the were ILs determinedwere determined by the by cumulative the cumulative effect ofeffect the electrostaticof the electrostatic interaction interaction between between the ionic the species ionic species and the inductionand the induction interactions interactions between thebetween ions, aggregates,the ions, aggregates, and clusters and (Figure clusters5). Among(Figure the5). Among studied the ILs, studied ILs, [C2mim][NTF₂] had the highest diffusivity and electrical conductivity and also the lowest [C2mim][NTF2] had the highest diffusivity and electrical conductivity and also the lowest viscosity at 298viscosity K and at 0.1 298 MPa. K and 0.1 MPa.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 5 of 37
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 37 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 37
FigureFigure 5.5. Alkyl-chain-lengthAlkyl-chain-length dependence dependence of viscosity of viscosity (η), electrical (η), electrical conductivity conductivity (σ), self-diffusion (σ), self-di (D)ffusion and molar concentration (M) for [Cnmim][NTF2] at 298 K and 0.1 MPa. The diffusion coefficient (D)Figure and molar 5. Alkyl-chain-length concentration (M)dependence for [Cnmim][NTF of viscosity2] ( atη), 298electrical K and conductivity 0.1 MPa. The (σ), di self-diffusionffusion coeffi (D)cient presentedpresentedand molar is is the concentrationthe result result of theof the(M) sum sumfor of cation [Cofn mim][NTFcation and anionand2] anionat self-di 298 self-diffusion.Kffusion. and 0.1 Image MPa. Image created The createddiffusion using datausing coefficient published data inpublishedpresented references in is [references34 the,36 ].result [34,36]. of the sum of cation and anion self-diffusion. Image created using data published in references [34,36]. InIn 2006, 2006, different different classes classes of cations of cations were studied were using studied 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C4mim]), + N-butylpyridinium ([bpy]), N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium ([C4mpyr] ) and N-butyl-N4,N+,N,- ([C4mim]),In 2006,N different-butylpyridinium classes of cations ([bpy]), were studiedN-butyl- usingN-methylpyrrolidinium 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium ([C4mpyr] ([C mim]),) and + − trimethylammonium ([C4NMe3] ) combined with+ [NTF₂] anions [35].4 As depicted+ in Figure 6, the N-butyl-N-butylpyridiniumN,N,N,-trimethylammonium ([bpy]), N-butyl- ([CN4NMe-methylpyrrolidinium3] ) combined with ([C [NTFmpyr]2]− anions) and [35N-butyl-]. As depictedN,N,N,- in −1 molartrimethylammonium concentrations ( M([C in4NMe mol.L3]+); combinedin neat ILs, with the1 molar[NTF₂ ]concentration− anions [35]. canAs depictedbe obtained in Figureby the ratio6, the Figure6, the molar concentrations ( M in mol.L− ; in neat ILs, the molar concentration can be obtained −1 bybetweenmolar the ratio concentrations density between and densitymolar (M in mass mol.L and of molar ; purein neat massIL) ILs, of of thethe pure studiedmolar IL) concentration of ILs the are studied close, can leading ILs be are obtained to close, the conclusion leadingby the ratio to the that the steric hindrance is another factor that determines the properties of the ILs, not only due to conclusionbetween thatdensity the and steric molar hindrance mass of is anotherpure IL) factorof the thatstudied determines ILs are close, the properties leading to of the the conclusion ILs, not only thethat geometry the steric but hindrance also due is to another the rotational factor that dynami determinescs of the the substituents properties of in the the ILs, cationic not only families. due to due to the geometry but also due to the rotational dynamics of the substituents in the cationic families. Accessibilitythe geometry to thebut chargedalso due center to the (region rotational with dynamithe highercs ofcharge the substituents density) determines in the cationic the strength families. of Accessibility to the charged center (region with the higher charge density) determines the strength of theAccessibility interaction to between the charged the cation center and (region the anion. with the In higherthese results, charge alsodensity) implicit determines is the dependence the strength of of the interaction between the cation and the anion. In these results, also implicit is the dependence of the thethe physicochemical interaction between properties the cation from and the the molecula anion. rIn dynamics; these results, the speedalso implicit of molecular is the dependence rotation and of physicochemical properties from the molecular dynamics; the speed of molecular rotation and the thethe rotation physicochemical of its functional properties groups from is thea factor molecula that rdetermines dynamics; the speedproximity of molecular of the neighbouring rotation and rotationspecies.the rotation ofThe its following functionalof its functional order groups was groups is found a factor is afor factor that the determines diffusionthat determines coefficient the proximity the andproximity conductivity: of the of neighbouring the neighbouring [C₄mim] species.+ > + + The following+ order+ was found+ for the diffusion coefficient and conductivity: [C mim] > [bpy] > [bpy]species. > [C The4mpyr] following > [C4NMe order3] .was found for the diffusion coefficient and conductivity:4 [C₄mim]+ > + + [C4[bpy]mpyr]+ > [C>4mpyr][C4NMe+ > 3[C] 4.NMe3]+.
Figure 6. Cation dependence of viscosity (η), electrical conductivity (σ), self-diffusion (D) and molar − FigureconcentrationFigure 6. 6.Cation Cation (M dependence) dependencefor [NTF₂] -based ofof viscosityviscosity ILs at ((298η), electricalK and 0.1 conductivity conductivityMPa. The diffusion (σ (σ),), self-diffusion self-di coefficientffusion ( presentedD ()D and) and molar molaris theconcentration result of the (M sum) for of[NTF cation₂]− -based and anionILs at 298self-d Kiffusion. and 0.1 MPa.Image Th createde diffusion using coefficient data published presented in is concentration (M) for [NTF2]− -based ILs at 298 K and 0.1 MPa. The diffusion coefficient presented references [35–37]. is the result of the sum of cation and anion self-d self-diiffusion.ffusion. Image Image created created using using data data published published in in referencesreferences [35 [35–37].–37].
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 6 of 37
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 37 The nature of the ionic species (size, shape, geometry, molecular dynamics and mass) and the interactionsThe nature (cation–cation, of the ionic cation–anion, species (size, shape, anion–anion) geometry, that molecular take place dynamics between and them mass) determine and the the macroscopicinteractions properties(cation–cation, of the cation–anion, bulk ILs, that anion–an is, to understandion) that take the place physical between properties them determine such as viscosity, the density,macroscopic electrical properties conductivity, of the bulk surface ILs, that tension, is, to un refractivederstand the index, physical melting proper point,ties such among as viscosity, others it is necessarydensity, electrical to look at conductivity, the (sub) microscopic surface tension, level. refractive index, melting point, among others it is necessary to look at the (sub) microscopic level. 3. Structural Organization 3. Structural Organization The local nanostructural organization and the physicochemical properties of ILs are directly related The local nanostructural organization and the physicochemical properties of ILs are directly to intermolecular interactions present in the system. The non-directional (coulombic) interactions related to intermolecular interactions present in the system. The non-directional (coulombic) lead to a more isotropic distribution of ionic species and the directional interactions (Van der Waals interactions lead to a more isotropic distribution of ionic species and the directional interactions (Van and hydrogen bonding) to an anisotropic distribution. An intermolecular interaction study based der Waals and hydrogen bonding) to an anisotropic distribution. An intermolecular interaction study on Density Functional Theory (DFT) using [C2mim][BF4] and [C4mim][PF6] ILs demonstrated that based on Density Functional Theory (DFT) using [C2mim][BF4] and [C4mim][PF6] ILs demonstrated thethat Coulombic the Coulombic Force contributesForce contributes with 70% with of 70% total of energy, total whichenergy, indicates which indicates that the otherthat the interactions, other likeinteractions, hydrogen like bonding, hydrogenπ–π bonding,stacking π and–π stacking dispersion and interactions,dispersion interactions, should also should affect also significantly affect thesignificantly physicochemical the physicochemical properties [38 properties,39]. Recently, [38,39]. a thoroughRecently, reviewa thorough focused review on understandingfocused on heterogeneousunderstanding microstructures heterogeneous microstructures and dynamics ofand ILs dynamics in bulk liquids,of ILs in in bulk mixtures liquids, with in mixtures cosolvents, with and incosolvents, interfacial regionsand in interfacial was published regions highlighting was publis thehed importance highlighting of the importance interplay among of the the interplay intra- and intermolecularamong the intra- interactions and intermolecular [40]. interactions [40]. + CationicCationic species species based based onon imidazoliumimidazolium ([C ([Cnnmim]mim]+) structures) structures present present polar polar (imidazole (imidazole ring) ring) and and nonpolarnonpolar (alkyl (alkyl chain) chain) domains. domains. OneOne ofof thethe firstfirst reportsreports on the presence of nanosegregated domains domains in ILsin associatedILs associated the aggregationthe aggregation behaviour behaviour to the to cation’s the cation’s side-chain side-chain length length by multiscale by multiscale coarse-graining coarse- methodgraining [41 method] a heterogeneity [41] a heterogeneity order parameter order concept parameter that quantifiesconcept that the geometricquantifies heterogeneity the geometric in IL washeterogeneity later introduced in IL was [42– 44later]. Sinceintroduced then, molecular[42–44]. Since dynamics then, molecular (MD) simulation dynamics and (MD) X-ray simulation analysis of imidazoliumand X-ray analysis ILs (ImIL) of imidazolium have been ILs extensively (ImIL) have used been to observeextensively the used nanoscale to observe IL structure, the nanoscale indicating IL astructure, sophisticated indicating special a organizationsophisticated special in the polarorganization domain in with the polar a 3D networkdomain with of ionic a 3D channels. network of This supramolecularionic channels. organizationThis supramolecul remainsar organization practically unchangedremains practically in the solidunchanged and liquid in the phase solid [and45– 52]. liquid phase [45–52]. Structural heterogeneity is observed with increased alkyl chain size as a Structural heterogeneity is observed with increased alkyl chain size as a consequence of the segregation consequence of the segregation of non-polar domains (Figure 7); the electrostatic interactions of non-polar domains (Figure7); the electrostatic interactions between charged sites assist the formation between charged sites assist the formation of polar domains and the uncharged groups are driven of polar domains and the uncharged groups are driven out of this region [25,45]. out of this region [25,45].
Figure 7. Snapshots of simulation boxes of [Cnmim][PF6]. Red=polar and green = nonpolar. (a) Figure 7. Snapshots of simulation boxes of [Cnmim][PF6]. Red=polar and green = nonpolar. (a) [C2mim][PF6]; (b) [C4mim][PF6]; (c) [C6mim][PF6]; (d) [C8mim][PF6] and (e) [C12mim][PF6]. Figure [C2mim][PF6]; (b) [C4mim][PF6]; (c) [C6mim][PF6]; (d) [C8mim][PF6] and (e) [C12mim][PF6]. Figure adaptedadapted from from [ 45[45].].
TheThe mainmain structurestructure ofof ImILsImILs can be describ describeded as as a asupramolecular supramolecular polymeric polymeric network network of of intermolecularintermolecular interactions interactions thatthat determine the the inte interionicrionic distances distances and and consequently consequently the the existence existence of of ionion pairs pairs and and/or/or aggregates aggregates andand freefree volume.
3.1.3.1. Ion Ion Pairs Pairs TheThe concept concept ofof IPIP inin ILsILs hashas been discussed and and revised revised many many times times in inthe the literature; literature; for forthis this reason,reason, it it will will be be only only succinctlysuccinctly exploredexplored here. here. The phenomenon of ion pair formation is of fundamental importance for different application The phenomenon of ion pair formation is of fundamental importance for different application fields, such as: (i) catalysis—due to its influence on reaction rates or transfer of chirality [53,54]; (ii) fields, such as: (i) catalysis—due to its influence on reaction rates or transfer of chirality [53,54]; (ii) CO2 CO2 capture—being decisive on sorption mechanism [55,56]; (iii) ion pair chromatography or
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 7 of 37 capture—being decisive on sorption mechanism [55,56]; (iii) ion pair chromatography or selective ion electrodes [57,58]. Since ILs are composed entirely of ions, a higher value of conductivity is expected. However, through experimental data, a smaller conductivity of the neat IL, when compared with diluted systems, has been reported [59–62]. This phenomenon has been interpreted as an indication of the existence of ion-pairing [63], transfer of charge [64] or the formation of small clusters of ions [65]. Marcus and Hefter defined ion pairing as:“ ... (partial) association of oppositely charged ions in electrolyte solutions to form distinct chemical species called ion pairs” [63]. To evaluate the conductivity and understand how ionic an IL is, the concept of ionicity (I) was proposed by Watanabe and co-workers [33–36,66]. For this purpose, the molar conductivity ratio Λ Λ ( imp ) of an IL is used as a measure of the ionicity: I = imp . Λ is the ionic conductivity measured ΛNMR ΛNMR imp by the electrochemical impedance method and ΛNMR is calculated from the self-diffusion coefficients + of cations (D ) and anions (D−), determined from pulse-field-gradient spin–echo (PGSE) NMR, using the Nernst–Einstein Equation (1).
N e2 Λ = A ∗ D+ + D (1) NMR kT − where NA is the Avogadro number, e is the electric charge on each ionic carrier, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. The molar conductivity ratio indicates the proportion of ions that contributes to ionic conduction from all the diffusing species and therefore can be used as a quantitative measure of ionicity. Another important feature of ILs to be considered for a tailored application is their polarity. However, due to the difficulty of establishing a polarity scale for ILs the hydrogen-bond basicity (β) (a Kamlet–Taft parameter) has been studied. To estimate the hydrogen-bonding interaction energy in 1 the equimolar cation–anion mixture (EHB (kJ.mol− ), the COnductor-like Screening MOdel for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) has been used for several ILs [67]. From a qualitative perspective, ionicity and hydrogen-bonding interaction energy should be related, since it is expected that ILs with a lower EHB (stronger hydrogen-bonding interaction) have a lower ionicity. The values of ionicity of some ILs reported by Ueno et al. [66] and the EHB reported by Cláudio et al. [67] were compiled and organized in Figure8. The analysis of the data clearly 2 shows two trends, one for ILs with the same cation [C4mim][X] (R 0.97) and another for ILs with the 2 same anion [Cnmim][NTF2] (R 0.93). For the first group, ionicity and EHB are strongly correlated and ionicity increases with the decrease in the strength of the hydrogen-bonding interaction (higher EHB) that is being controlled by the nature of the anion. For the second group, an increase in ionicity can be observed with the decrease in the size of the imidazolium side chain, but the interaction energy EHB remains almost unchanged. These observations indicate that ionicity is influenced by other factors than the strength of the interaction between cation and anion by hydrogen bonding. For the first group the ionicity sequence for the ILs studied follows the reported basicity scale, [CF3CO2]− > [OTF]− > [BF4]− > [NTF2]− > [PF6]− [67,68]. For the same cation, the stronger the interaction with the corresponding anion by hydrogen bonding, the lower the ionicity. In the second group, the behaviour observed for ILs with the same anion could be correlated to the structural heterogeneity of ILs, which increases according to the size of the cation side chain, as shown in the MD simulations (Figure7)[ 45]. Segregation of non-polar domains leads to aggregate formation, which reduces the conductivity and ionicity of ILs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7745 8 of 37 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 37