CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E336 HON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E336 HON E336 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks March 16, 2000 well-established relationship with the home- I would like to introduce a letter into the tion of this letter are supported and ex- less, and that is where their energies will be RECORD from Dr. Douglas Piirto, a Professor panded upon by the information that is pre- focusedÐcounting those hardest-to-count indi- of Forestry and Natural Resource Manage- sented in the sections which follow it. Please refer to the figure attached at the viduals, the wandering homeless who all too ment at Cal Poly, in San Luis Obispo, Cali- end of this letter before proceeding with earily slip into invisibility. fornia. He has been working on giant sequoia reading the Win/Win Solution section of this That is exactly the sort of commitment, dedi- health for almost thirty years and is very con- letter. They say a picture tells what a 1,000 cation, and civic partnership the census re- cerned about how monument status will un- words can't do. The figure of the Confederate quires. This is (as we in Akron say) ``where dermine forest management flexibility. I would Group in Mariposa Grove illustrates what the rubber meets the road''Ðfinding, identi- encourage my colleagues to read his thought- can happen to vegetation within a giant se- fying, and counting those who lack basic shel- ful recommendations. quoia grove over an 80-year period. This let- ter. Unfortunately, the Administration has com- ter makes the case that significant manage- For three generations, the Thomas family pletely ignored all of these scientific findings. ment flexibility is needed to respond to the dramatic changes in vegetation that can has guided the Haven of Rest with a deep and And the Forest Service has done little to im- occur in giant sequoia groves. abiding sense of the dignity and worth of plement them. A WIN/WIN SOLUTION every individual. They understand and live the Instead, what we now see is an election campaign driving forest policy. The campaign Let's first start with what I think most in- creed that everyone matters and every one of formed people agree on: (1) Some people us counts. pollsters say we should lock it up! But this is might debate the meanings of the protect, I commend them for their caring, and for not in the best interest of these sequoia preserve, and restore goals for national for- their inspirational demonstration of what ``civic grovesÐit is only in the best interest of one est giant sequoia groves as specified in the duty is really all about. election campaign. 1992 Presidential Proclamation but most f This second bill would authorize a National citizens would, I think, largely agree with Research Council study of the forest. They their intent; (2) some type of management INTRODUCTION OF DILLONWOOD should review past studies and offer rec- area designation featuring giant sequoias GIANT SEQUOIA GROVE PARK ommendations for exactly what kind of man- may be appropriate; (3) the subwatershed EXPANSION ACT; AND GIANT SE- agement will preserve these treasures. The basin containing the giant sequoia grove QUOIA GROVES PROTECTION AND should be the area that is specifically identi- National Research Council offers us some of fied to receive a specific management area MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2000 the best independent scientific review in the designation; (4) flexible/adaptive manage- world and I hope the Administration will listen ment, including fire surrogate methods (e.g., HON. GEORGE RADANOVICH to them. selective thinning to reduce risk of cata- OF CALIFORNIA This should be about the health of the for- strophic fire occurrence) is needed given the many different conditions that exist in na- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES est, not the health of an election campaign. If we really care about the future of the giant tional forest giant sequoia groves; (5) Man- Thursday, March 16, 2000 sequoia, then we will listen to the scientists. agement must be tied to science; (6) Ade- Mr. RADANOVICH. Mr. Speaker, today I am Campaign spin doctors and their polls cannot quate funding must be provided to support management and research work; and (7) The introducing legislation to preserve some of and should not try to manage a forest. role of the Giant Sequoia Ecology Coopera- America's greatest treasuresÐthe giant se- MARCH 7, 2000. tive should be reinforced and expanded with quoias of central California. Re Antiquities Act and Giant Sequoia an adequate funding mechanism to support The first bill I am offering would expand the Groves: Giant SequoiaÐa Relic of the an Executive Director, staff, office space and boundaries of Sequoia National Park. There is Past or an Icon to the Future associated costs for managing the Coopera- an area called Dillonwood Grove that includes Hon. William Clinton, tive. So if it follows that there is widespread one of the riches sequoia groves in the region. President of the United States, agreement on these 7 main items, then I The private owners want this tract to become White House, Washington, DC. would suggest the following management ac- DEAR PRESIDENT CLINTON: I write this let- tions be addressed: a part of our Park system and I support their ter with a highest degree of urgency and re- 1. Expand on the 1992 Presidential Procla- right to do that. This bill would authorize the spect for your office. You are about to make mation by issuing a 2000 Presidential Procla- change. a decision that NBC states in their 2/16/2000 mation directing the Forest Service to pro- The most compelling thing about news story could impact the long-term sur- vide protection, preservation, and restora- Dillonwood, however, is that this private prop- vival of giant sequoia trees. They are right tion work to the lands within the sub-water- erty has been actively managed for many but not in the context that they say it. De- shed basin containing the giant sequoia years and it offers us living proof to the advan- ciding to create a national monument for the groves. Ask Congress for approval of your tages of flexible forest management. While giant sequoia groves that occur on national proclamation if possible to gain a broader forest lands will result in the creation of spectrum of support. Approximately 19,345 Dillonwood will enter into the Sequoia National places where ``relics'' of giant sequoia are acres exist with the tree-line areas of the 38+ Park, it is important to look at the manage- featured. To think that simply drawing a giant sequoia groves that occur on the Se- ment lessons from Dillonwood, as we seek to line around a giant sequoia grove and stop- quoia National Forest. Increasing manage- protect, restore and maintain the sequoia ping all management activity is in the best ment attention to the subwatersheds that groves outside of the Park. interest of the long-term survival of giant contain the giant sequoia groves would in- The President thinks the best way to do this sequoia is incorrect. I fully disagree with crease this special designation status to by designating a 400,000-acre national monu- any attempt to put the national forest giant about 100,000 acres on the Sequoia National ment. I disagree. sequoia groves in national monument status. Forest. I recommend that the remaining A flexible range of management is needed 300,000 acres be released from management First, the giant sequoia in the Sequoia, Si- that cannot occur if they are designated only area special designation which would re- erra and Tahoe Forests have been off limits to as national monuments or national parks. I spond to concerns expressed by the local for- logging for over 10 years! A Mediated Settle- reach out to you at this time with the great- est products industry. ment in 1990 set aside these groves to per- est degree of humility I can muster. There is 2. I recommend a designation other than manently ensure their protection. President no scientific justification in my opinion to national monument. National monument George Bush signed a proclamation in 1992 to designate giant sequoia groves on national connotes to me the idea of preserving relics state the policy for management to be to pro- forest land as national monuments. Our com- rather than adaptively managing eco- tect, preserve and restore goods for giant se- mon interest is to see that they receive the systems. The Forest Service has a large best stewardship possible. So, as much as we number of special designations it uses for the quoia groves in national forests. In fact, over may differ on a variety of issues, I need to lands under its jurisdiction. One of those des- 80% of the Sequoia National Forest is already have your attention for the next few minutes ignations, I think, should suffice. The impor- off limits to logging. as I make my case regarding the future of tant thing is that a subwatershed area is The scientists also disagree. In 1996, the giant sequoia groves. identified for each grove that will fall under Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project said the I have organized this letter into the fol- the three goals of protect, preserve, and re- best way to keep the forest healthy was lowing sections: A Win/Win Solution; My store. through active management of the groves. Credentials, Interest, and Role in Giant Se- 3. The goals of protect, preserve, and re- quoia Management; The Problem As I See It; They did not recommend a monument. In ad- store should be expanded to include the Si- Why the Need for a Flexible Range of Man- erra and Tahoe National Forest groves.
Recommended publications
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report Signature: ______________________________ Date: _________________________________ 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias Table of Contents Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias ............................................................................................ 3 Desired Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Giant Sequoias ......................................................................................................................... 5 Mixed Conifer Forest............................................................................................................... 5 Blue Oak–Interior Live Oak (Foothill
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011-2012 U.S
    National Park Service Visitor Guide: Winter 2011-2012 U.S. Department of the Interior Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks & Sequoia National Forest/Giant Sequoia National Monument Welcome to the Land of Giants In This Issue Bears & food storage .........11 YOU EXPECT GIANT TREES with the U.S. Geological Survey con- All park partners, public and private, Camping ..............................4 and huge canyons—and you won’t duct scientifi c studies on park resourc- cooperate to meet a challenging mis- be disappointed. What may surprise es here. The Sequoia Natural History sion—providing for public enjoyment Exploring on your own: you is that the whole of these parks is Association runs bookstores at visitor while keeping the parks unimpaired Sequoia .............................6 even greater than the sum of its famous centers, then plows those funds into for future generations. You are the Kings Canyon & USFS .......7 parts. park education and research eff orts. most important partner! Experience Another non-profi t, the Sequoia Parks these parks and learn all you can. Your Facilities ............................8-9 Rising from 1300’ to 14,494’ (the high- Foundation, supports important proj- help is needed to preserve and share Lodging ...............................5 est elevation in the lower 48 states), ects, from outreach to trails. these treasured landscapes. these parks protect a spectacular Map ......................................8 elevational range. This span from low to high means dramatic shifts from Snowy Giant Forest and Moro Rock Park ecosystems ...................3 warm foothills to cool forests to the Phone numbers ...................2 cold High Sierra. It means diverse plants and animals living in extremely Ranger programs & varied conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to the Sierra National Forest
    Sierra Traveler A Visitor’s Guide to the Sierra National Forest Photo by Joshua Courter by Joshua Photo Anne Lake, Ansel Adams Wilderness - Sierra National Forest What are you interested in doing in the Sierra? Can we help you find what you want to do in the Sierra? Visit Your National Forest! Destinations ......................................................................................................... 2 Sierra National Forest Supervisors Office Camping Guide .................................................................................................. 3 1600 Tollhouse Rd. Clovis, CA 93611 Helpful Hints ........................................................................................................ 4 (559) 297-0706 Merced River Country ...................................................................................... 5 Yosemite South/Highway 41 .......................................................................... 6 High Sierra Ranger District Bass Lake ............................................................................................................... 7 29688 Auberry Rd. Prather, CA 93651 Mammoth Pool Reservoir ............................................................................... 8 (559) 855-5355 San Joaquin River Gorge Management ..................................................... 9 Bass Lake Ranger District Sierra Vista National Scenic Byway ...................................................... 10-12 57003 Road 225 North Fork, CA 93643 Dinkey Creek/McKinley Grove ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Giant Sequoia National Monument
    United States Department of Agriculture Discover the Giant Sequoia National Monument Western Divide Ranger District Hume Lake Ranger District The Monument is named for the native Giant Sequoia tree, Sequoiadendron giganteum, the world’s largest tree. Sequoias can tower more than 300 feet high and reach diameters of 40 feet. Out of approximately 67 groves in the Sierra, the Monument contains 38. On April 15, 2000, President William J. Clinton, by proclamation, In addition, almost all National Forest System land created the Giant Sequoia National Monument. The Giant Sequoia is available for you to choose your own camping National Monument is located within Sequoia National Forest in the spot and this is called dispersed camping. Southern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Gateways are Highway Remember to obtain a campfire permit if you plan 180 east of Fresno, Highway 190 east of Porterville, County Road M-56 to make your own camp and pack out all your trash. east of California Hot Springs, and Highway 178 east and north of Bakersfield. The Monument encompasses approximately 327,769 acres Several refurbished historic cabins can be rented for over-night of federal land managed by the Sequoia National Forest, Western Divide visits: Big Meadows Guard Station near Hume Lake, Poso Station and Hume Lake Ranger Districts. near Sugarloaf and Glenville, Frog Meadow Guard Station near Tobias Peak, and Mountain Home Guard Station near Balch Park The landscape is as spectacular as its 38 groves of giant sequoia. Elevation and Mountain Home Demonstration State Forest. Please contact the climbs from around 1,000 to 9,700 feet over a distance of only a few Districts for more miles, capturing an extraordinary array of habitats within a relatively information .
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating the Role of Science in Managing Giant Sequoia Groves1
    Communicating the Role of Science in Managing Giant Sequoia Groves1 Douglas D. Piirto, Robert R. Rogers, and Mary Chislock Bethke2 Abstract.-Management of giant sequoia groves has been State Park, the University of California, Bureau of Land and continues to be a hotly debated issue. The debate has Management, and Tulare County manage 10 percent of the reached Congress, with all parties seeking resolution as to total grove area. The remaining area (i.e., approximately 10 what constitutes an ecologically and publicly acceptable percent) of giant sequoia is privately held. management approach. Determining the correct management approach and communicating that approach to The tree has been surrounded by controversy from its the general public is the crux of the problem. Emerging discovery. Dr. Albert Kellogg, the first to possess specimens concepts and principles of forest ecosystem management of giant sequoia in 1852, hesitated to apply the new genus may provide a mechanism to seek resolution of these name Washingtonia sp. to giant sequoia. This delay to act by management problems related to giant sequoia. Kellogg enabled an English botanist, John Lindley, to be the first to formally propose a new name for giant sequoia, The Memorandum of Understanding between the members Wellingtonia after the Duke of Wellington. This naming of of the recently formed Giant Sequoia Ecology Cooperative giant sequoia by the English after a noted Englishman led to provided the impetus for the development of this first working a cross fire of American controversy that lasted for decades paper, which attempts to: 1) describe the historical events (Ornduff 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks 5
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Yosemite, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks Yosemite National Park p44 Around Yosemite National Park p134 Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks p165 Michael Grosberg, Jade Bremner PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to Yosemite, YOSEMITE NATIONAL Tuolumne Meadows . 80 Sequoia & PARK . 44 Hetch Hetchy . 86 Kings Canyon . 4 Driving . 87 Yosemite, Sequoia & Day Hikes . 48 Kings Canyon Map . 6 Yosemite Valley . 48 Cycling . 87 Yosemite, Sequoia & Big Oak Flat Road Other Activities . 90 Kings Canyon Top 16 . 8 & Tioga Road . 56 Winter Activities . 95 Need to Know . 16 Glacier Point & Sights . 97 Badger Pass . 60 What’s New . 18 Yosemite Valley . 97 Tuolumne Meadows . 64 If You Like . 19 Glacier Point & Wawona . 68 Month by Month . 22 Badger Pass Region . 103 Hetch Hetchy . 70 Itineraries . 24 Tuolumne Meadows . 106 Activities . 28 Overnight Hikes . 72 Wawona . 109 Yosemite Valley . 74 Travel with Children . 36 Along Tioga Road . 112 Big Oak Flat & Travel with Pets . 41 Big Oak Flat Road . 114 Tioga Road . 75 Hetch Hetchy . 115 Glacier Point & Badger Pass . 78 Sleeping . 116 Yosemite Valley . 116 VEZZANI PHOTOGRAPHY/SHUTTERSTOCK © VEZZANI PHOTOGRAPHY/SHUTTERSTOCK DECEMBER35/SHUTTERSTOCK © NIGHT SKY, GLACIER POINT P104 PEGGY SELLS/SHUTTERSTOCK © SELLS/SHUTTERSTOCK PEGGY HORSETAIL FALL P103 VIEW FROM TUNNEL VIEW P45 Contents UNDERSTAND Yosemite, Sequoia & TAHA RAJA/500PX TAHA Kings Canyon Today . .. 208 History . 210 Geology . 216 © Wildlife . 221 Conservation . 228 SURVIVAL GUIDE VIEW OF HALF DOME FROM Clothing & GLACIER POINT P104 Equipment . 232 Directory A–Z . 236 Glacier Point & SEQUOIA & KINGS Badger Pass . 118 Transportation . 244 CANYON NATIONAL Health & Safety . 249 Big Oak Flat Road & PARKS .
    [Show full text]
  • John Theodore Buchholz
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 30 | Issue 1 Article 3 2012 John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936 Rudolf Schmid University of California, Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Recommended Citation Schmid, Rudolf (2012) "John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 30: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol30/iss1/3 Aliso, 30(1), pp. 5–17 ’ 2012, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden JOHN THEODORE BUCHHOLZ (1888–1951) STUDYING CONIFERS IN CALIFORNIA, ESPECIALLY SEQUOIADENDRON AND SEQUOIA (CUPRESSACEAE) IN 1936 RUDOLF SCHMID1 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Biographical details are given for John Theodore Buchholz (1888–1951), including his interest in conifers of California and New Caledonia. Buchholz made detailed studies of the vegetative morphology, reproductive morphology, and embryology of Sequoiadendron giganteum and Sequoia sempervirens prior to his 1939 segregation of Sequoiadendron from Sequoia. Buchholz, a professor at the University of Illinois (1929–1951), spent spring and summer of his 1936 sabbatical in California. Description of Buchholz’s technique for morphological collections provides
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia Ring -Width Chronologies from the Central Sierra Nevada, California
    Giant Sequoia Ring-Width Chronologies from the Central Sierra Nevada, California Item Type Article Authors Brown, Peter M.; Hughes, Malcolm K.; Baisan, Christopher H.; Swetnam, Thomas W.; Caprio, Anthony C. Citation Brown, P.M., Hughes, M.K., Baisan, C.H., Swetnam, T.W., Caprio, A.C. 1992. Giant sequoia ring-width chronologies from the central Sierra Nevada, California. Tree-Ring Bulletin 52:1-14. Publisher Tree-Ring Society Journal Tree-Ring Bulletin Rights Copyright © Tree-Ring Society. All rights reserved. Download date 02/10/2021 03:00:01 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/262342 TREE -RING BULLETIN, Vol. 52, 1992 GIANT SEQUOIA RING -WIDTH CHRONOLOGIES FROM THE CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA PETER M. BROWN, MALCOLM K. HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER H. BAISAN, THOMAS W. SWETNAM, and ANTHONY C. CAPRIO Laboratory of Tree -Ring Research University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 ABSTRACT Giant sequoia was one of the first species that A. E. Douglass examined in his pioneering tree - ring research. Recent attention to sequoia, stimulated by fire history studies in sequoia groves, has resulted in new ring -width chronologies based on both recently collected tree -ring material and Douglass' original samples. The development and characteristics of four new multimillennial sequoia chronologies are described here. Three of these chronologies are based on tree -ring series from individual sites: Camp Six (347 B.C. to A.D. 1989), Mountain Home (1094 B.C. to A.D. 1989), and Giant Forest (1235 B.C. to A.D. 1988). The fourth is a composite chronology (1235 B.C. to A.D. 1989) that includes radii from the other three chronologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadows in the Sierra Nevada of California: State of Knowledge
    Figure 7―Meadow series vegetated mar- gin (A), montane (B), slope (B), hanging (B), and tinkers penny (N) in McKinley Grove, Kings River Ranger District, Sierra National Forest. Figure 8―Meadow series vegetated mar- gin (A), montane (B), basin (A), sunken- concave (F), and slender spikerush (L) near Clover Meadow, Minarets Ranger District, Sierra National Forest. subalpine belt, and is in a basin. An intermittent stream short-hair sedge. On the more moist side, sites of this series meanders the length and is tributary to Delaney Creek, which tend to have more shorthair. The caespitose grasses form passes through the lower reaches of the meadow. large bunches, which account for much of the 12 percent The hydrologic series of the site is normal. It receives water cover of higher plants. Litter covers 77 percent of the surface. from upslope in the spring. Soil texture at the site is a sandy Alpine aster (Aster alpigenus) and Sierra bilberry are the two loam with pH 4.9. The water table in mid-July was at a depth next most important species. of 78 cm. At that depth, a layer of coarse sand appears to serve A meadow in the McKinley Grove of Sequoias on the as an aquifer carrying water under the meadow. Shorthair is Kings River Ranger District, Sierra National Forest, contains the vegetative series of the site. Shorthair and Sierra ricegrass a fine example of series A-B-B-B-N (fig. 7). The meadow has (Oryzopsis kingii) make up 36 percent of the composition. On vegetated margins, lies at 6,480 ft (1,975 m) in the montane this site, however, Sierra ricegrass is the main species.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on DEIS Volume 2, Appendix C: Wild and Scenic Rivers Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests
    Exhibit VIII.1-1 Comments on DEIS Volume 2, Appendix C: Wild and Scenic Rivers Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests General Comments on Evaluation Process The Forest Service deserves recognition for conducting a comprehensive evaluation of potential Wild & Scenic Rivers (WSRs) in the Forest Plans Revision (FPR) process. We appreciate that the agency incorporated its previously completed inventories, eligibility findings, and suitability recommendations. We also greatly appreciate that the Inyo and Sierra Forests determined additional streams to be eligible. However, we identified a number of problems with Appendix C that require attention – not the least of which is the Sequoia Forest’s dismal (in comparison to the Inyo and Sierra) inventory and evaluation results, which failed to identify any new eligible stream segments. We also appreciated the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary inventory and evaluation in February 2016. However, we are disappointed to find that few of the points raised in our 26 pages of detailed comments were addressed in Appendix C. So these comments are somewhat duplicative to the ones submitted by CalWild et al dated Feb. 1, 2016, which are hereby incorporate by reference. Be advised that new additional points are included in these comments. WSR Inventory/Evaluation Comments Applicable To All Three Forests Unnamed Streams Not Inventoried (DEIS Vol. 2, App. C, pg. 379) – The inventory process appears to be restricted to rivers and streams named on 7.5-minute USGS quad maps. There is nothing in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH), federal guidelines, or in federal law that limits WSR inventories and evaluations to only named streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia Scientific Advisory Board October 31
    Giant Sequoia Scientific Advisory Board October 31 – November 1, 2001 Appendix to Meeting Minutes Appendix E Handouts from Doug Piirto Scientific Advisory Board Member 10/30/01 Converse Basin, A Research/Demonstration Area This draft outline statement was prepared by Dr. Douglas D. Piirto for review by the Giant Sequoia National Monument Science Advisory Board at its October 31, 2001 meeting. Issue: Should the Converse Basin be used as a “research/demonstration area”? Facts: •The Converse Basin Grove is the largest grove within the Giant Sequoia National Monument. It comprises an area of approximately 4,327 acres including the mandated Mediated Settlement Agreement buffer zone. The Ecological Unit Inventory that was completed in 1996 surveyed a larger area of approximately 7,745 acres that included the Converse Basin area and the adjacent McGee Canyon area •This basin and canyon area are both tributary to the Kings River. It is known as an area of extremely high relief with elevations ranging from 4,100 feet in the bottom of McGee Canyon to 7,200 feet at the top of Converse Mountain. •Several major drainages exist within the area including: Mill Flat Creek, Converse Creek, Verplank Creek, and Cabin Creek. •Special features in Converse Basin worth noting include: 1.) Chicago Stump; 2.) D21 stump near the Chicago stump that was dated by Andrew Douglas sometime between 1914 and 1930; 3.) Muir snag; 4.) Telescope snag; 5.) Log trestle; 6.) Boole tree; 7.) Rob Roy Hoist site; 8.) Rock Hoist site; 9.) The live telescope tree reported to occur somewhere in Converse Basin; 10.) Ellsworth Huntington stump; 11.) Converse Basin Mill site, and.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 11B - Giant Sequoia Literature Review
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 11b - Giant Sequoia Literature Review Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.11b ON THE COVER Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park Photography by: Brent Paull A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 11b - Giant Sequoia Literature Review Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.11b R. Wayne Harrison Senior Environmental Scientist (Ret.) California Department of Parks and Recreation August 29, 2011 [This paper was funded by a grant from the Save the Redwoods League.] June 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This document contains subject matter expert interpretation of the data.
    [Show full text]