DOCSLIB.ORG

Giant Sequoia Scientific Advisory Board October 31

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Giant Sequoia Scientific Advisory Board October 31 Giant Sequoia Scientific Advisory Board October 31 – November 1, 2001 Appendix to Meeting Minutes Appendix E Handouts from Doug Piirto Scientific Advisory Board Member 10/30/01 Converse Basin, A Research/Demonstration Area This draft outline statement was prepared by Dr. Douglas D. Piirto for review by the Giant Sequoia National Monument Science Advisory Board at its October 31, 2001 meeting. Issue: Should the Converse Basin be used as a “research/demonstration area”? Facts: •The Converse Basin Grove is the largest grove within the Giant Sequoia National Monument. It comprises an area of approximately 4,327 acres including the mandated Mediated Settlement Agreement buffer zone. The Ecological Unit Inventory that was completed in 1996 surveyed a larger area of approximately 7,745 acres that included the Converse Basin area and the adjacent McGee Canyon area •This basin and canyon area are both tributary to the Kings River. It is known as an area of extremely high relief with elevations ranging from 4,100 feet in the bottom of McGee Canyon to 7,200 feet at the top of Converse Mountain. •Several major drainages exist within the area including: Mill Flat Creek, Converse Creek, Verplank Creek, and Cabin Creek. •Special features in Converse Basin worth noting include: 1.) Chicago Stump; 2.) D21 stump near the Chicago stump that was dated by Andrew Douglas sometime between 1914 and 1930; 3.) Muir snag; 4.) Telescope snag; 5.) Log trestle; 6.) Boole tree; 7.) Rob Roy Hoist site; 8.) Rock Hoist site; 9.) The live telescope tree reported to occur somewhere in Converse Basin; 10.) Ellsworth Huntington stump; 11.) Converse Basin Mill site, and. other important features too numerous to list here. •The area has a long history of natural and human disturbances. •The grove was privately owned and heavily logged in the 1890’s and early 1900’s. •Two major somewhat catastrophic wildland fires (i.e., 1928 Converse Fire and the 1955 McGee Fire) burned through Converse Basin, which significantly affected the varied existing vegetation mosaic we see today. •These past disturbance events resulted in numerous federal actions to restore the burned areas and past heavily logged areas of Converse Basin. For example, several plantations of mostly ponderosa pine were established in heavily burned areas affected by the McGee Fire. •Today, most areas of Converse Basin contain a densely stocked, 80 to 100 year-old, and second-growth mixed conifer forest with plantations scattered throughout the forest. •A few pockets of old-growth trees remain within Converse Basin including the: Boole tree, Cabin Creek Grove, and several large trees on the Kings River Canyon rim west of Stump Meadow. •The USDA Forest Service acquired control of this area after the private logging had occurred. 1 10/30/01 Ecological Transfer Effects This draft outline statement was prepared by Dr. Douglas D. Piirto for review by the Giant Sequoia National Monument Science Advisory Board at its October 31, 2001 meeting. Issue: Should the Forest Service consider “ecological transfer effects” from not using timber removed from the monument? Facts: •Market demand for timber is relatively inelastic. •If one doesn’t log in one area, one logs somewhere else. A recent story by William Keye in the Sacramento Bee states: “U.S. lumber consumption has increased by 16%. Most of that demand, and its environmental impacts, has been transferred to lands outside the United States.” •Third world countries many of which contain tropical forests will be impacted by our decisions to not log California public forests. Libby (1992) states preservation of only 100 acres of Sierra Nevada forest will hasten the extinction of one species somewhere in the world given that timber harvest will have to occur elsewhere to meet public demands for wood. •Concern already has been expressed that the southern United States which is referred to as the nation’s “wood basket” is cutting more than it is growing to meet, in part, the demand formerly met by timber harvest of California public commercial forestlands. •Over the last decade, 59 lumber mills have been closed in California due to a lack of sustained supplies of timber for sale. •One lumber mill in the southern San Joaquin valley closed specifically in response to the formation of the Giant Sequoia National Monument. Reason: no assurance of a timber log market. •Over 90% of the allowed timber harvest for the Sequoia National Forest prior to 2000 came from the land area that is now called the Giant Sequoia National Monument. •Current forest growth rates for the Giant Sequoia National Monument are between 1.5 to 2 percent per year. That means that within the next 10 years there will be between 15 to 20 percent more living softwood tree biomass. •With timber harvest levels slashed by 51% in the past decade, 70% of our wood fiber is now brought in from other states and nations (Sacramento Bee 2001). •Significant public concern has been expressed about the selected alternative (Modified Alternative 8) displayed in the Record of Decision for the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment. Quoting a recent report by the National Association of Forest Service Retirees 2001): “We believe that the decision will probably not sustain the forest resources, especially the old forests and associated wildlife habitats, of the Sierra Nevada, largely as a result of the inability to provide 10/30/01 Ecological Transfer Effects This draft outline statement was prepared by Dr. Douglas D. Piirto for review by the Giant Sequoia National Monument Science Advisory Board at its October 31, 2001 meeting. Issue: Should the Forest Service consider “ecological transfer effects” from not using timber removed from the monument? Facts: •Market demand for timber is relatively inelastic. •If one doesn’t log in one area, one logs somewhere else. A recent story by William Keye in the Sacramento Bee states: “U.S. lumber consumption has increased by 16%. Most of that demand, and its environmental impacts, has been transferred to lands outside the United States.” •Third world countries many of which contain tropical forests will be impacted by our decisions to not log California public forests. Libby (1992) states preservation of only 100 acres of Sierra Nevada forest will hasten the extinction of one species somewhere in the world given that timber harvest will have to occur elsewhere to meet public demands for wood. •Concern already has been expressed that the southern United States which is referred to as the nation’s “wood basket” is cutting more than it is growing to meet, in part, the demand formerly met by timber harvest of California public commercial forestlands. •Over the last decade, 59 lumber mills have been closed in California due to a lack of sustained supplies of timber for sale. •One lumber mill in the southern San Joaquin valley closed specifically in response to the formation of the Giant Sequoia National Monument. Reason: no assurance of a timber log market. •Over 90% of the allowed timber harvest for the Sequoia National Forest prior to 2000 came from the land area that is now called the Giant Sequoia National Monument. •Current forest growth rates for the Giant Sequoia National Monument are between 1.5 to 2 percent per year. That means that within the next 10 years there will be between 15 to 20 percent more living softwood tree biomass. •With timber harvest levels slashed by 51% in the past decade, 70% of our wood fiber is now brought in from other states and nations (Sacramento Bee 2001). •Significant public concern has been expressed about the selected alternative (Modified Alternative 8) displayed in the Record of Decision for the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment. Quoting a recent report by the National Association of Forest Service Retirees 2001): “We believe that the decision will probably not sustain the forest resources, especially the old forests and associated wildlife habitats, of the Sierra Nevada, largely as a result of the inability to provide 10/30/01 adequate fuels management, the lack of provisions for regeneration, and the inability to fully implement the decision.” Management Implications: There is little doubt that demand for wood will not decrease. Using wood to meet our needs is the most environmentally friendly thing we can do given that using any other non-renewable alternatives (e.g., steel, concrete) consumes up to nine times more energy and is permanently destructive to the environment (Koch 1992, Libby 1992, Moore 2001). Substantial public concern exists about the sustainability of preservation-oriented alternatives in achieving sound resource management objectives. Advice: The Forest Service (i.e., Sequoia National Forest and the Giant Sequoia National Monument) must clearly come to grips with this ethical dilemma of not meeting, in part, its fair share of the nation’s timber supply needs. The Environmental Impact Statement must clearly evaluate for the citizen’s of the United States the tradeoffs that have been sacrificed and the effects that other areas will feel should no aspect for the timber supply issue be fully addressed in management actions for the Giant Sequoia National Monument. The size of the Giant Sequoia National Monument should be evaluated in relation to: 1.) The availability of public funds to manage the Giant Sequoia National Monument and 2.) The larger national timber supply problem. References: •Koch, P. 1992. Wood versus nonwood materials in U.S. residential construction: some energy-related global implications. Forest Products Journal 42:31-42. •Libby, W. J. 1992. Managing Some Consequences of Giant Sequoia Management. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Giant Sequoias: Their Place in the Ecosystem and Society. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-151. •Moore, P. 2001.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report Signature: ______________________________ Date: _________________________________ 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias Table of Contents Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias ............................................................................................ 3 Desired Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Giant Sequoias ......................................................................................................................... 5 Mixed Conifer Forest............................................................................................................... 5 Blue Oak–Interior Live Oak (Foothill
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011-2012 U.S
    National Park Service Visitor Guide: Winter 2011-2012 U.S. Department of the Interior Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks & Sequoia National Forest/Giant Sequoia National Monument Welcome to the Land of Giants In This Issue Bears & food storage .........11 YOU EXPECT GIANT TREES with the U.S. Geological Survey con- All park partners, public and private, Camping ..............................4 and huge canyons—and you won’t duct scientifi c studies on park resourc- cooperate to meet a challenging mis- be disappointed. What may surprise es here. The Sequoia Natural History sion—providing for public enjoyment Exploring on your own: you is that the whole of these parks is Association runs bookstores at visitor while keeping the parks unimpaired Sequoia .............................6 even greater than the sum of its famous centers, then plows those funds into for future generations. You are the Kings Canyon & USFS .......7 parts. park education and research eff orts. most important partner! Experience Another non-profi t, the Sequoia Parks these parks and learn all you can. Your Facilities ............................8-9 Rising from 1300’ to 14,494’ (the high- Foundation, supports important proj- help is needed to preserve and share Lodging ...............................5 est elevation in the lower 48 states), ects, from outreach to trails. these treasured landscapes. these parks protect a spectacular Map ......................................8 elevational range. This span from low to high means dramatic shifts from Snowy Giant Forest and Moro Rock Park ecosystems ...................3 warm foothills to cool forests to the Phone numbers ...................2 cold High Sierra. It means diverse plants and animals living in extremely Ranger programs & varied conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21: Literature: John Muir
    Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 21 Literature: John Muir John Muir's exceptional mental and physical stamina enabled him to rigorously pursue, often in solitary fashion, the exploration of California's mountains. In the Fall of 1874 and the Spring of 1875 he climbed Mt. Shasta three times. Among the entries listed in this section are Muir's pocket notebooks kept during these climbs. His 1875 notebook contains many detailed drawings of the Shasta region. In one case, on April 28, 1875, he drew from the summit of Mt. Shasta a picture depicting an approaching storm, a storm similar to the one which would two days later, on another climb of the mountain, trap him and his climbing partner Jerome Fay on the summit of Mt. Shasta. Also listed in this section are the reports of A. F. Rodgers, who had hired Muir and Fay in the Spring of 1875 to go and take summit barometric readings. Rodgers wrote a fascinating report which vividly details the appearance and condition of Muir and Fay immediately following the overnight ordeal on April 30, 1875. Muir himself wrote stories of the ordeal that were published in several sources, including Harper's Magazine in 1877 and Picturesque California in 1888. Many of Muir's other published works describe Mt. Shasta. His earliest Mt. Shasta writings were a series of five articles printed in the San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin in 1874 and 1875; these have been edited and published by Robert Engberg as part of John Muir: Summering in the Sierra (not the same book as Muir's own book My First Summer in the Sierra).
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Trees of California (1907), by Galen Clark
    Next: Title Page The Big Trees of California (1907), by Galen Clark Contents Illustrations • Title • Cover [Wawona Tree drawing] • Contents • Galen Clark • Illustrations • General Grant Tree • Prologue • Grizzly Giant • The Big Trees of California • Dancing Pavilion, Calaveras Grove • Origin of the Big Trees • Illinois Tree, Tuolumne Grove • Distribution of the Big Trees • Guardian’s Cabin, Mariposa Grove • The Mariposa Grove • General Grant Tree • General Grant and Sequoia National Parks • In the Merced Grove • Size of the Big Trees • General Sherman Tree • Age of the Sequoias • Mother of the Forest • Habits and Characteristics • Empire State Tree, Calveras Grove • Cones and Seeds • Four Guardsmen • Young Sequoias • Cones and Foliage • Celebrated Specimens • Fallen Monarch • A Solitary Survivor • Young Sequoia • Other Celebrated Trees • Wawona Tree • Botanical Nomenclature • Grizzly Giant • Wawona Hotel and Cottages • Boole Tree, King’s River Grove • Dead Giant, Tuolumne Grove About the Author Galen Clark in front of Grizzly Giant circa 1865-66. C. E. Watkins photo. Galen Clark is famous for his discovery of the Mariposa Grove of Giant Sequoia trees and for his role as Guardian of Yosemite National Park for several years. Mr. Clark didn’t seek to enrich himself from Yosemite Valley or the Sequoia Trees. He did try to make a living though. He ran a modest hotel and guide service, but was a poor business man who was constantly in debt. “Clark’s Station” in Wawona, for example, had several more employees than required for the number of guests and its short season. Toward the end of his life Mr. Clark was desperately poor. He wasn’t a great book writer, but due to his popularity and need to make a living, wrote three books on Yosemite.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Giant Sequoia National Monument
    United States Department of Agriculture Discover the Giant Sequoia National Monument Western Divide Ranger District Hume Lake Ranger District The Monument is named for the native Giant Sequoia tree, Sequoiadendron giganteum, the world’s largest tree. Sequoias can tower more than 300 feet high and reach diameters of 40 feet. Out of approximately 67 groves in the Sierra, the Monument contains 38. On April 15, 2000, President William J. Clinton, by proclamation, In addition, almost all National Forest System land created the Giant Sequoia National Monument. The Giant Sequoia is available for you to choose your own camping National Monument is located within Sequoia National Forest in the spot and this is called dispersed camping. Southern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. Gateways are Highway Remember to obtain a campfire permit if you plan 180 east of Fresno, Highway 190 east of Porterville, County Road M-56 to make your own camp and pack out all your trash. east of California Hot Springs, and Highway 178 east and north of Bakersfield. The Monument encompasses approximately 327,769 acres Several refurbished historic cabins can be rented for over-night of federal land managed by the Sequoia National Forest, Western Divide visits: Big Meadows Guard Station near Hume Lake, Poso Station and Hume Lake Ranger Districts. near Sugarloaf and Glenville, Frog Meadow Guard Station near Tobias Peak, and Mountain Home Guard Station near Balch Park The landscape is as spectacular as its 38 groves of giant sequoia. Elevation and Mountain Home Demonstration State Forest. Please contact the climbs from around 1,000 to 9,700 feet over a distance of only a few Districts for more miles, capturing an extraordinary array of habitats within a relatively information .
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating the Role of Science in Managing Giant Sequoia Groves1
    Communicating the Role of Science in Managing Giant Sequoia Groves1 Douglas D. Piirto, Robert R. Rogers, and Mary Chislock Bethke2 Abstract.-Management of giant sequoia groves has been State Park, the University of California, Bureau of Land and continues to be a hotly debated issue. The debate has Management, and Tulare County manage 10 percent of the reached Congress, with all parties seeking resolution as to total grove area. The remaining area (i.e., approximately 10 what constitutes an ecologically and publicly acceptable percent) of giant sequoia is privately held. management approach. Determining the correct management approach and communicating that approach to The tree has been surrounded by controversy from its the general public is the crux of the problem. Emerging discovery. Dr. Albert Kellogg, the first to possess specimens concepts and principles of forest ecosystem management of giant sequoia in 1852, hesitated to apply the new genus may provide a mechanism to seek resolution of these name Washingtonia sp. to giant sequoia. This delay to act by management problems related to giant sequoia. Kellogg enabled an English botanist, John Lindley, to be the first to formally propose a new name for giant sequoia, The Memorandum of Understanding between the members Wellingtonia after the Duke of Wellington. This naming of of the recently formed Giant Sequoia Ecology Cooperative giant sequoia by the English after a noted Englishman led to provided the impetus for the development of this first working a cross fire of American controversy that lasted for decades paper, which attempts to: 1) describe the historical events (Ornduff 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks 5
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Yosemite, Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks Yosemite National Park p44 Around Yosemite National Park p134 Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks p165 Michael Grosberg, Jade Bremner PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to Yosemite, YOSEMITE NATIONAL Tuolumne Meadows . 80 Sequoia & PARK . 44 Hetch Hetchy . 86 Kings Canyon . 4 Driving . 87 Yosemite, Sequoia & Day Hikes . 48 Kings Canyon Map . 6 Yosemite Valley . 48 Cycling . 87 Yosemite, Sequoia & Big Oak Flat Road Other Activities . 90 Kings Canyon Top 16 . 8 & Tioga Road . 56 Winter Activities . 95 Need to Know . 16 Glacier Point & Sights . 97 Badger Pass . 60 What’s New . 18 Yosemite Valley . 97 Tuolumne Meadows . 64 If You Like . 19 Glacier Point & Wawona . 68 Month by Month . 22 Badger Pass Region . 103 Hetch Hetchy . 70 Itineraries . 24 Tuolumne Meadows . 106 Activities . 28 Overnight Hikes . 72 Wawona . 109 Yosemite Valley . 74 Travel with Children . 36 Along Tioga Road . 112 Big Oak Flat & Travel with Pets . 41 Big Oak Flat Road . 114 Tioga Road . 75 Hetch Hetchy . 115 Glacier Point & Badger Pass . 78 Sleeping . 116 Yosemite Valley . 116 VEZZANI PHOTOGRAPHY/SHUTTERSTOCK © VEZZANI PHOTOGRAPHY/SHUTTERSTOCK DECEMBER35/SHUTTERSTOCK © NIGHT SKY, GLACIER POINT P104 PEGGY SELLS/SHUTTERSTOCK © SELLS/SHUTTERSTOCK PEGGY HORSETAIL FALL P103 VIEW FROM TUNNEL VIEW P45 Contents UNDERSTAND Yosemite, Sequoia & TAHA RAJA/500PX TAHA Kings Canyon Today . .. 208 History . 210 Geology . 216 © Wildlife . 221 Conservation . 228 SURVIVAL GUIDE VIEW OF HALF DOME FROM Clothing & GLACIER POINT P104 Equipment . 232 Directory A–Z . 236 Glacier Point & SEQUOIA & KINGS Badger Pass . 118 Transportation . 244 CANYON NATIONAL Health & Safety . 249 Big Oak Flat Road & PARKS .
    [Show full text]
  • (ZBA-CAL) Zoning Board of Appeals Variances
    (ZBA-CAL) Zoning Board of Appeals variances 9/2/2015 A_CODESUFX A_APPLNUM NAME ADDRESS DECISION A_COMMENT A_MAPA_LOT A_DATE ZONE CAL 1942 4 ROSS, ALAN 1015 BOSTON POST ROAD erection of frame garage 73 15 4/22/1942 B CAL 1942 6 LENTZ, FRANK 29 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD to render valid the existence of two houses 3 110 4/23/1942 A CAL 1942 6 LENTZ, FRANK 486 HOYT STREET to render valid the existence of two houses 3 138 4/23/1942 A CAL 1942 7 CURTIS, MAYBEL 98 HOLMES AVENUE side variance, families per acre variance 48 124 6/3/1942 B CAL 1942 8 RYLE, JOSEPH CAL 1942 9 TERRY, JOHN 322 WEST AVENUE relocation of garage on same lot 23 72 6/11/1942 CAL 1942 10 ARTHUR OLSON, INC 11 DEVON ROAD GR GR- construction to premises 24 86 6/6/1942 CAL 1942 11 RAYMOND, FANNIE BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- extension of building 7/10/1942 CAL 1942 12 BAKER, CARL 1120 BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- manufacture of war materials 72 23-24 9/8/1942 B CAL 1942 13 MONTGOMERY WARD & C 10 CHERRY STREET apply zoning rules in respect to variance 41 40 10/8/1942 B CAL 1942 14 VOGEL, RICHARD FIVE MILE RIVER ROAD GR GR- to make property line lawful 67 10 11/12/1942 AA CAL 1942 15 LENTZ, FRANK HOYT STREET to render valid existence of house at right of wa 8 12/9/1942 A CAL 1942 16 ALEXANDER, CHAS 780 BOSTON POST ROAD GR GR- extension of time to desist manufacturing o 16 88 12/10/1942 B CAL 1942 16 ALEXANDER, CHAS 780 BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- to use the premises for manufacturing war 16 107 12/10/1942 B CAL 1943 1 HARVEY, HANNAH 89 BUTTONWOOD LANE GR GR- to validate existence of dwelling 5 1 5/11/1943
    [Show full text]
  • John Theodore Buchholz
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 30 | Issue 1 Article 3 2012 John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936 Rudolf Schmid University of California, Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Recommended Citation Schmid, Rudolf (2012) "John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 30: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol30/iss1/3 Aliso, 30(1), pp. 5–17 ’ 2012, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden JOHN THEODORE BUCHHOLZ (1888–1951) STUDYING CONIFERS IN CALIFORNIA, ESPECIALLY SEQUOIADENDRON AND SEQUOIA (CUPRESSACEAE) IN 1936 RUDOLF SCHMID1 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Biographical details are given for John Theodore Buchholz (1888–1951), including his interest in conifers of California and New Caledonia. Buchholz made detailed studies of the vegetative morphology, reproductive morphology, and embryology of Sequoiadendron giganteum and Sequoia sempervirens prior to his 1939 segregation of Sequoiadendron from Sequoia. Buchholz, a professor at the University of Illinois (1929–1951), spent spring and summer of his 1936 sabbatical in California. Description of Buchholz’s technique for morphological collections provides
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia Ring -Width Chronologies from the Central Sierra Nevada, California
    Giant Sequoia Ring-Width Chronologies from the Central Sierra Nevada, California Item Type Article Authors Brown, Peter M.; Hughes, Malcolm K.; Baisan, Christopher H.; Swetnam, Thomas W.; Caprio, Anthony C. Citation Brown, P.M., Hughes, M.K., Baisan, C.H., Swetnam, T.W., Caprio, A.C. 1992. Giant sequoia ring-width chronologies from the central Sierra Nevada, California. Tree-Ring Bulletin 52:1-14. Publisher Tree-Ring Society Journal Tree-Ring Bulletin Rights Copyright © Tree-Ring Society. All rights reserved. Download date 02/10/2021 03:00:01 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/262342 TREE -RING BULLETIN, Vol. 52, 1992 GIANT SEQUOIA RING -WIDTH CHRONOLOGIES FROM THE CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA PETER M. BROWN, MALCOLM K. HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER H. BAISAN, THOMAS W. SWETNAM, and ANTHONY C. CAPRIO Laboratory of Tree -Ring Research University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 ABSTRACT Giant sequoia was one of the first species that A. E. Douglass examined in his pioneering tree - ring research. Recent attention to sequoia, stimulated by fire history studies in sequoia groves, has resulted in new ring -width chronologies based on both recently collected tree -ring material and Douglass' original samples. The development and characteristics of four new multimillennial sequoia chronologies are described here. Three of these chronologies are based on tree -ring series from individual sites: Camp Six (347 B.C. to A.D. 1989), Mountain Home (1094 B.C. to A.D. 1989), and Giant Forest (1235 B.C. to A.D. 1988). The fourth is a composite chronology (1235 B.C. to A.D. 1989) that includes radii from the other three chronologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia and Kings Canyon
    SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARNBa»CALI»ORNjA Sixty Lakes Basin, Kings Canyon National Park Lying across the heart of the Sierra Nevada in east central Although the two parks have many similar features, you see without guidance—but, for safety's sake, not alone. the mountains. Stay on the trails. Avoid trips alone. Tell California, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks em­ will learn, as you explore and observe, that each park has You may fish, take a saddle-horse trip, follow the close-in one of your party or a park ranger where you are going and brace more than 1,300 square miles of spectacular granite its own distinctive character. trails, hike into the mountains. when you expect to be back. mountains, deep canyons, and magnificent forests. Jeweled Your car. Some mountain roads are crooked and steep. lakes and tumbling waterfalls adorn this glacier-carved land­ So always drive on your own side. Drive slowly and shift into PLANNING YOUR TIME TO HAVE A TROUBLE-FREE VISIT scape. From west to east, the two parks extend from the second or low gear to control your speed. Continuous use foothills near the San Joaquin Valley to the crest of the Depending upon your point of entry and route of travel While here, you are living a life different in two respects of your brakes may cause them to overheat; this may result High Sierra. From north to south, they stretch some 65 within the parks, you should first learn about the features from your normal life: (1) You are in a National Park that in loss of control of your car.
    [Show full text]