DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Policy on Central Asia and the Role of Russian Nationalism,” Silk Road Papers, Washington, D.C.: the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, April 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Policy on Central Asia and the Role of Russian Nationalism,” Silk Road Papers, Washington, D.C.: the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, April 2008 Marlene LARUELLE Office: IERES, The George Washington University, 1957 E Street, NW, Suite 412, Washington D.C., 20052 Home: 2700 Virginia Av., NW, apt. 1208, Washington, DC, 20037 [email protected], http://marlene-laruelle.com ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT Current position • Research Professor of International Affairs, Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES), Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University (2011-). • Director of the Central Asia Program, IERES (2012-). • Associate Director, IERES (2015-). Previous positions • Senior Research Fellow, The Russian and Eurasian Studies Program, SAIS, Johns Hopkins University, Washington D.C. (May 2010-April 2011). • Senior Research Fellow, The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Center affiliated with Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, Washington D.C., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm (September 2007-April 2010). FUNDINGS AND AWARDS • Project Director, “Central Eurasia – Religion in International Affairs” Initiative, Henry Luce Foundation (April 1, 2014-March 31, 2016). • Principal Investigator, “Unknown Pages of the History of Fascism: The Eurasian Fixation of the European Far Right,” Anonymous donor (January 1, 2014-December 31, 2015). • Project Director, “Central Asia Fellowship,” The Open Society Foundations (January 2013- December 2016). • Project Director, ‘Kazakhstan Initiative,” Kazakhstan Embassy in the United States (September 1, 2013-October 30, 2014). • Project Director, “Women and Water in South and Central Asia: Building International Social Capital for Sustainable Peace and Development,” The U.S. State Department (January 2013- December 2015), in partnership with GW Global Gender Program. • Co-Principal Investigator, “Arctic Research Coordination Network. Building a Research Network for Promoting Arctic Urban Sustainability,” National Science Foundation (2013-2017). Team leader for the WP “Social Urban Sustainability in Russia’s Arctic Regions”. • Co-Principal Investigator, ARCSUS (ARCtic Urban SUStainability in Russia), implemented by Tromso University, funded by the Norwegian Research Council (2013-2016). Team leader for the WP “Social Urban Sustainability in Russia’s Arctic Regions”. • Project Director, “Observatory of Central Asia,” The French Defense Ministry (Délégation aux affaires stratégiques) (September 2012-August 2015). 1 • Principal Investigator, “Reassessing Afghanistan’s Neighborhood: Regional Perceptions and Strategies, and US Interests,” The Smith Richardson Foundation (March 15, 2012-March 14, 2013). • Principal Investigator, International conference “Afghanistan's Stability and Regional Security Implications for Central Asia,” The NATO Science for Peace and Security Program. • Principal Investigator, “The Kremlin’s Arctic Dreams: Geo-Strategic Implications for Russia and the World in 2040,” The Office of Net Assessment (May 2010-April 2011). • Co-Investigator, “Russian Economic Trends Study until 2030,” The Office of Secretary of Defense (October 2010-March 2011), implemented by the Hudson Institute, with Richard Weitz and Clifford Gaddy. • Principal Investigator “Beyond the ‘Clans’ War’ Hypothesis: Dechipering the Complexity of Kremlin Networks,” The Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (July-September 2010). • Co-Investigator, “The Challenges of Development in Central Asia,” The French Agency for Development (June-October 2010). • Co-Investigator, “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and perspectives of regional security in Central Asia,” The French Defense Ministry (Délégation aux affaires stratégiques), implemented by the Foundation for Strategic Research, with Isabelle Facon and Emmanuel Puig (January-December 2010). • Principal Investigator, “Inside and Around the Kremlin's Black Box: the New Nationalist Think Tanks in Russia,” funded by the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (July-September 2009). • Co-Investigator, “Russia in a 10-20 years perspective,” The Swedish Armed Forces HQ, implemented by the ISDP, with Anna Jonsson, and Fredrik Erixon (January-June 2009). • Principal Investigator, “Coping with the Russo-Chinese Competition in Central Asia: Local Perspectives and Strategies,” The Smith Richardson Foundation (January-December 2008). RESEARCH GRANTS AND VISITING POSITIONS • Research Fellow, “Reshaping Everyday Citizenry: Migrants in Moscow, Kiev, and Astana,” William and Helen Petrach Program on Ukraine, IERES, The Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University (September 2011-June 2012). • Visiting Research Fellow, The Uppsala Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University (October 2011). • Visiting Research Fellow, The Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki (August, September, November 2009). • Visiting Research Fellow in India, Foundation Maison des Sciences de l’homme and Indian University Grant Commission (October 2009). • Visiting Research Fellow, The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (January-April 2009). • Non-resident Research Fellow, “Euphemizing Antisemitism. Conspiracy Theories in Russia’s New Academic Disciplines,” The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (June-December 2007). • Research Fellow, “Eurasianism, an Ideology of Empire,” The French National Center of Publications (October 2006-May 2007). • Informal Visiting Fellow, The Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan (July- September 2006). • Research Fellow, “Nationalism and the Academia in Russia,” The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington D.C. (September 2005-May 2006). 2 • Post-Doctoral Fellow, The French Institute for Central Asian Studies (IFEAC), Tashkent, Uzbekistan (September 2002-August 2005). • Lavoisier Fellow, The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia, Moscow and St Petersburg (November 2000-May 2002). • Visiting Fellow, The French Institute of Anatolian Studies, Istanbul, Turkey (May-August 2001). • Doctoral Fellow, The French Institute for Central Asian Studies, Tashkent (October 1998-October 2000). • Doctoral Fellow, The French Institute of Social Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic (October 1997- June 1998). EDUCATION • Ph.D. at the National Institute of Oriental Languages and Cultures, INALCO (2002) • M.A. on Central European (Czech) Studies at INALCO (1998) • M.A. on Post-Soviet Studies at INALCO (1997) • B.A. in Post-Soviet Studies at INALCO (1994), in Political Science at Paris II-Assas (1996), and in History at Paris VII-Jussieu (1996) TEACHING EXPERIENCE • Reemerging Nationalisms in Eurasia IAFF 6638 (Spring semester), GWU. • Central Asia: Society, Security, Economy, IAFF 6638 (Fall semester), GWU • Invited Supervisor at the Department of Eurasian Studies, Gumilev University, Astana, Kazakhstan (2011-13). Co-supervision of PhD students. • Member of the pedagogical team of the Post-Soviet Studies Department at Sciences Po (the Institute of Political Studies) Paris, (2006-). Supervision of PhD and Master students. • Guest Lecturer at the National Institute of Oriental Languages and Cultures, Paris (2001-02) • History and Geography Teacher at the French School in Tashkent, Uzbekistan (1998-99) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • 2011- Associate Researcher at FRIDE (Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior), Madrid • 2011- Member of PONARS (Program on New Approaches to Research and Security in Eurasia) • 2011- Contributor to Oxford Analytica • 2010- Subject Matter Expert, ISAF Strategic Assessment Group, NATO Central Intelligence • 2009- Member of EUCAM (Europe-Central Asia Monitoring) • 2008- Associate Fellow at the Post-Soviet Studies Department at the Institute of Political Studies (IEP), Paris • 2002- Associate Fellow at the Center for Russian, Caucasian and East-European Studies (CERCEC) at the School of Advanced Social Sciences Studies (EHESS), Paris MEMBERSHIP IN ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS • Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES). • Member of the board, 2014-2016, Central Eurasian Studies Society (CESS). • Association for the Study of Nationalities (ASN). 3 • Women in International Security (WIIS). • French Center for Post-Soviet Societies Studies (INALCO, Paris). • French-Russian Center in Social Sciences and Humanities (Moscow). OTHER ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES • Editor in chief of Central Asian Affairs • Director of the book series “Contemporary Central Asia. Societies, Politics and Cultures” at Lexington, an Imprint of Rowman & Littlefield. • Member of the Executive Editorial Board of Demokratizatsiya. The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization (2011-). • Member of the Editorial Board of Nationalities Papers (2007-), Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society (2015-) The Central Eurasian Reader (2007-2010), The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly (2009-2010), Cahiers d’Asie centrale (2003-2007), and of Mezhdunarodnye issledovaniia [International Research, State University, Astana, Kazakhstan] (2010-). • Member of the Editorial Board of the book series “Eurasian Study Library” at Brill Publishers (London), and of “Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics & Society” at Verlag-Ibidem (Stuttgart). • Co-director of the book series “Sociétés postsoviétiques en mouvement” [Post-Soviet Societies on the Move] at Petra, with Virginie Symaniec (2007-2013). • Member of the International Advisory Board of MYPLACE (Memory, Young, Political Legacy and Civic Engagement), a European Commission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nationalism and the Collapse of Soviet Communism
    Nationalism and the Collapse of Soviet Communism MARK R. BEISSINGER Abstract This article examines the role of nationalism in the collapse of communism in the late 1980s and early 1990s, arguing that nationalism (both in its presence and its absence, and in the various conflicts and disorders that it unleashed) played an important role in structuring the way in which communism collapsed. Two institutions of international and cultural control in particular – the Warsaw Pact and ethnofederalism – played key roles in determining which communist regimes failed and which survived. The article argues that the collapse of communism was not a series of isolated, individual national stories of resistance but a set of interrelated streams of activity in which action in one context profoundly affected action in other contexts – part of a larger tide of assertions of national sovereignty that swept through the Soviet empire during this period. That nationalism should be considered among the causes of the collapse of communism is not a view shared by everyone. A number of works on the end of communism in the Soviet Union have argued, for instance, that nationalism played only a minor role in the process – that the main events took place within official institutions in Moscow and had relatively little to do with society, or that nationalism was a marginal motivation or influence on the actions of those involved in key decision-making. Failed institutions and ideologies, an economy in decline, the burden of military competition with the United States and instrumental goals of self-enrichment among the nomenklatura instead loom large in these accounts.1 In many narratives of the end of communism, nationalism is portrayed merely as a consequence of communism’s demise, as a phase after communism disintegrated – not as an autonomous or contributing force within the process of collapse itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Emmanuel Macron Is the Most Gaullist of All Candidates for the French Presidential Elections of 2017
    Policy Paper Centre international Note de recherche de formation européenne Matthias Waechter*, April 18th , 2017* CIFE Policy Paper N°53 Nothing new in French politics? Why Emmanuel Macron is the most Gaullist of all candidates for the French presidential elections of 2017 The French presidential campaign of 2017 turns soon as he exercised power from 1958 onwards, his very much around the buzzword of renewal: assertion lost its credibility and he was quickly Renewal of the political elites, the morals and perceived as the overarching figure of the French habits of political leaders, the party system. Some Right, triggering by the same token the consolida- of the candidates, most prominently far-left politi- tion of a leftist opposition. cian Jean-Luc Mélenchon, even fight for a constitu- tional turnover and the creation of a "Sixth Repu- The claim to pave a third way between left and blic". Among the five leading candidates, one right, to transcend the allegedly unproductive presents himself not only as an innovator, but also conflict between those political currents is at the as a revolutionary: It is Emmanuel Macron with his core of Emmanuel Macron's political stance. He movement "En Marche!" The campaign book by the doesn't deny his origins from the political left, but former minister of the economy appeared under the asserts that this cleavage is nowadays obsolete title "Revolution" and traces the way towards a and that good ideas should be taken from all profoundly changed France beyond the cleavage of camps. His movement "En Marche!" posts on its Left and Right.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Foreign Policy and National Identity
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Senior Honors Theses Undergraduate Showcase 12-2017 Russian Foreign Policy and National Identity Monica Hanson-Green University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Hanson-Green, Monica, "Russian Foreign Policy and National Identity" (2017). Senior Honors Theses. 99. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses/99 This Honors Thesis-Restricted is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Honors Thesis-Restricted in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Honors Thesis-Restricted has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY An Honors Thesis Presented to the Program of International Studies of the University of New Orleans In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts, with University High Honors and Honors in International Studies By Monica Hanson-Green December 2017 Advised by Dr. Michael Huelshoff ii Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Building Cultural Bridges: Benjamin Britten and Russia
    BUILDING CULTURAL BRIDGES: BENJAMIN BRITTEN AND RUSSIA Book Review of Benjamin Britten and Russia, by Cameron Pyke Maja Brlečić Benjamin Britten visited Soviet Russia during a time of great trial for Soviet artists and intellectuals. Between the years of 1963 and 1971, he made six trips, four formal and two private. During this time, the communist regime within the Soviet Union was at its heyday, and bureaucratization of culture served as a propaganda tool to gain totalitarian control over all spheres of public activity. This was also a period during which the international political situation was turbulent; the Cold War was at its height with ongoing issues of nuclear armaments, the tensions among the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom ebbed and flowed, and the atmosphere of unrest was heightened by the Vietnam War. It was not until the early 1990s that the Iron Curtain collapsed, and the Cold War finally ended. While the 1960s were economically and culturally prosperous for Western Europe, those same years were tough for communist Eastern Europe, where the people still suffered from the aftermath of Stalin thwarting any attempts of artistic openness and creativity. As a result, certain efforts were made to build cultural bridges between West and East, including efforts that were significantly aided by Britten’s engagements. In his book Benjamin Britten and Russia, Cameron Pyke portrays the bridging of the vast gulf achieved through Britten’s interactions with the Soviet Union, drawing skillfully from historical and cultural contextualization, Britten’s and Pears’s personal accounts, interviews, musical scores, a series of articles about Britten published in the Soviet Union, and discussions of cultural and political figures of the time.1 In the seven chapters of his book, Pyke brings to light the nature of Britten’s six visits and offers detailed accounts of Britten’s affection for Russian music and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Woolf's Portraits of Russian Writers
    Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Darya Protopopova All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-2753-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-2753-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note on the Text ........................................................................................ vi Preface ...................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Russia and the British Search for the Cultural ‘Other’ Chapter One .............................................................................................. 32 Woolf’s Real and Fictional Russians Chapter Two ............................................................................................. 58 Woolf and Dostoevsky: Verbalising the Soul Chapter Three ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917
    An Old Believer ―Holy Moscow‖ in Imperial Russia: Community and Identity in the History of the Rogozhskoe Cemetery Old Believers, 1771 - 1917 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctoral Degree of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Peter Thomas De Simone, B.A., M.A Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor David Hoffmann Robin Judd Predrag Matejic Copyright by Peter T. De Simone 2012 Abstract In the mid-seventeenth century Nikon, Patriarch of Moscow, introduced a number of reforms to bring the Russian Orthodox Church into ritualistic and liturgical conformity with the Greek Orthodox Church. However, Nikon‘s reforms met staunch resistance from a number of clergy, led by figures such as the archpriest Avvakum and Bishop Pavel of Kolomna, as well as large portions of the general Russian population. Nikon‘s critics rejected the reforms on two key principles: that conformity with the Greek Church corrupted Russian Orthodoxy‘s spiritual purity and negated Russia‘s historical and Christian destiny as the Third Rome – the final capital of all Christendom before the End Times. Developed in the early sixteenth century, what became the Third Rome Doctrine proclaimed that Muscovite Russia inherited the political and spiritual legacy of the Roman Empire as passed from Constantinople. In the mind of Nikon‘s critics, the Doctrine proclaimed that Constantinople fell in 1453 due to God‘s displeasure with the Greeks. Therefore, to Nikon‘s critics introducing Greek rituals and liturgical reform was to invite the same heresies that led to the Greeks‘ downfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolaj Von Wassilko. Bukovinian Statesman and Diplomat
    https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2019.01.010 POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES NIKOLAJ VON WASSILKO. BUKOVINIAN STATESMAN AND DIPLOMAT Oleksandr DOBRZHANSKYI Yurii Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The article is dedicated to the study of the political biography of Nikolaj von Wassilko, a well-known Bukovinian leader, one of the most controversial personages among Ukrainian politicians of Austria-Hungary at the end of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. It is worth mentioning that many scientists from various countries wrote about N. Wassilko, but separate studies about his life and political activities have not been written yet. Author paid considerable attention to the formation of N. Wassilko's political views, the evolution of his preferences from conservative Rusynism and Moscophilia philosophy to the populistic doctrine. Since the beginning of the 20th century, N. Wassilko became almost the sole leader of Ukrainians in Bukovina. The article presents the analysis of his activities in the Austrian Parliament, the Diet of Bukovina, public organizations, and his initiatives to resolve various regional issues. His activities in the years of World War I were equally rich. In particular, the article shows his diplomatic activities as the ambassador of the ZUNR (West Ukrainian People's Republic) in Vienna, the ambassador of the UPR (Ukrainian People's Republic) in Switzerland and other countries. At the end of the research, the author points out the remarkable path of N. Wassilko in the history of the Ukrainian movement in Bukovina in the early twentieth century, as one of the central figures of the Ukrainian diplomacy during 1918-1924.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstream Russian Nationalism and the “State-Civilization” Identity: Perspectives from Below
    Nationalities Papers (2021), 49: 1, 89–107 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.8 ARTICLE Mainstream Russian Nationalism and the “State-Civilization” Identity: Perspectives from Below Matthew Blackburn* The Institute of Russian and Eurasian Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Based on more than 100 interviews in European Russia, this article sheds light on the bottom-up dynamics of Russian nationalism. After offering a characterization of the post-2012 “state-civilization” discourse from above, I examine how ordinary people imagine Russia as a “state-civilization.” Interview narratives of inclusion into the nation are found to overlap with state discourse on three main lines: (1) ethno-nationalism is rejected, and Russia is imagined to be a unique, harmonious multi-ethnic space in which the Russians (russkie) lead without repressing the others; (2) Russia’s multinationalism is remembered in myths of peaceful interactions between Russians (russkie) and indigenous ethnic groups (korennyye narodi) across the imperial and Soviet past; (3) Russian culture and language are perceived as the glue that holds together a unified category of nationhood. Interview narratives on exclusion deviate from state discourse in two key areas: attitudes to the North Caucasus reveal the geopolitical-security, post-imperial aspect of the “state- civilization” identity, while stances toward non-Slavic migrants in city spaces reveal a degree of “cultural nationalism” that, while
    [Show full text]
  • International Press
    International press The following international newspapers have published many articles – which have been set in wide spaces in their cultural sections – about the various editions of Europe Theatre Prize: LE MONDE FRANCE FINANCIAL TIMES GREAT BRITAIN THE TIMES GREAT BRITAIN LE FIGARO FRANCE THE GUARDIAN GREAT BRITAIN EL PAIS SPAIN FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG GERMANY LE SOIR BELGIUM DIE ZEIT GERMANY DIE WELT GERMANY SUDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG GERMANY EL MUNDO SPAIN CORRIERE DELLA SERA ITALY LA REPUBBLICA ITALY A NEMOS GREECE ARTACT MAGAZINE USA A MAGAZINE SLOVAKIA ARTEZ SPAIN A TRIBUNA BRASIL ARTS MAGAZINE GEORGIA A2 MAGAZINE CZECH REP. ARTS REVIEWS USA AAMULEHTI FINLAND ATEATRO ITALY ABNEWS.RU – AGENSTVO BUSINESS RUSSIA ASAHI SHIMBUN JAPAN NOVOSTEJ ASIAN PERFORM. ARTS REVIEW S. KOREA ABOUT THESSALONIKI GREECE ASSAIG DE TEATRE SPAIN ABOUT THEATRE GREECE ASSOCIATED PRESS USA ABSOLUTEFACTS.NL NETHERLANDS ATHINORAMA GREECE ACTION THEATRE FRANCE AUDITORIUM S. KOREA ACTUALIDAD LITERARIA SPAIN AUJOURD’HUI POEME FRANCE ADE TEATRO SPAIN AURA PONT CZECH REP. ADESMEUFTOS GREECE AVANTI ITALY ADEVARUL ROMANIA AVATON GREECE ADN KRONOS ITALY AVLAIA GREECE AFFARI ITALY AVLEA GREECE AFISHA RUSSIA AVRIANI GREECE AGENZIA ANSA ITALY AVVENIMENTI ITALY AGENZIA EFE SPAIN AVVENIRE ITALY AGENZIA NUOVA CINA CHINA AZIONE SWITZERLAND AGF ITALY BABILONIA ITALY AGGELIOF OROS GREECE BALLET-TANZ GERMANY AGGELIOFOROSTIS KIRIAKIS GREECE BALLETTO OGGI ITALY AGON FRANCE BALSAS LITHUANIA AGORAVOX FRANCE BALSAS.LT LITHUANIA ALGERIE ALGERIA BECHUK MACEDONIA ALMANACH SCENY POLAND
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • I Giovani Gastroenterologi Italiani Nell'europa Di Oggi
    FISMAD INCONTRA I GIOVANI 2017 Roma, 29 Marzo 2017 I GIOVANI GASTROENTEROLOGI ITALIANI NELL’EUROPA DI OGGI Gianluca Ianiro Gastroenterology Area - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”- Roma UEG Young Talent Group @gianluca1aniro Email: [email protected] EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY 1 UMBRELLA SOCIETY (UEG) NATIONAL48 MEMBER SOCIETIES ORDINARY16 MEMBER SOCIETIES Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Austria, Belgium (SRBGE), Belgium (VVGE) Bosnia & Hercegovina, Bulgaria, EAES, EAGEN,EASL, ECCO, EDS, EFISDS, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia (GNGHS), Georgia (GNGS), EHMSG, EPC, ESCP, ESDO, ESGAR, ESGE, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy (AIGO), Italy (SIGE), Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, ESNM, ESP, ESPCG, ESPGHAN Luxembourg, Macedonia, Montenegro, Morocco, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain (AEG), Spain (SEPD), Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands (NVGE), The Netherlands (NVMDL), Tunisia, Turkey, UK, Ukraine EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY IS MUCH1 LARGER UMBRELLA SOCIETY (UEG) THAN E.U.(27 members) NATIONAL48 MEMBER SOCIETIES ORDINARY16 MEMBER SOCIETIES Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Austria, Belgium (SRBGE), Belgium (VVGE) Bosnia & Hercegovina, Bulgaria, EAES, EAGEN,EASL, ECCO, EDS, EFISDS, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia (GNGHS), Georgia (GNGS), EHMSG, EPC, ESCP, ESDO, ESGAR, ESGE, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy (AIGO), Italy (SIGE), Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, ESNM, ESP,
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Tools of Media Policy for the Preservation of Media Pluralism: an Analysis of Solutions Adopted in Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany and Italy M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Вестник СПбГУ. Международные отношения. 2018. Т. 11. Вып. 4 UDC 32.019.51 provided by Saint Petersburg State University Economic tools of media policy for the preservation of media pluralism: An analysis of solutions adopted in Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany and Italy M. Jas-Koziarkiewicz, E. Stasiak-Jazukiewicz University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28 00-927 Warsaw, Poland For citation: Jas-Koziarkiewicz M., Stasiak-Jazukiewicz E. Economic tools of media policy for the preservation of media pluralism: An analysis of solutions adopted in Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany and Italy. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 2018, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 415–435. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.407 Media policy makers are looking for safeguards for freedom of expression other than statutory guarantees. The economic tools of media policy are one of the forms they use. The presented anal- ysis is based on the assumptions of constructivism. The adoption of this theoretical perspective is also connected with the authors’ accepting the statement that shared norms, values and ideas are strengthened, consolidated, worked out, contested and changed in social processes. The starting point for the adopted research strategy was a case study. The article presents indirect and direct subsidies supporting media pluralism in Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany and Italy. All of the analysed countries decided to use this form of media support, but the scope of assistance provided is different. The media are most strongly supported by France and Austria while in Italy the level of support can be defined as medium and economic interventions on the media market are taken to the smallest extent by Germany and the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]