DOCSLIB.ORG

The Cold War Name: Learning Targets Hour

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Cold War Name: Learning Targets Hour The Cold War Name: Learning Targets Hour: 1. Define & contrast the conflicting values between the U.S. and Soviet Union that led to the Cold War: Be able to contrast each pair of terms (a-b, c-d, e-f, g-h) a. capitalism: private ownership of industry; freedom of competition; survival of the fittest; laissez faire; creates different economic classes. (USA) b. socialism: government ownership of industry; created as a reaction to capitalism; goal is to bring economic equity to people; classless society. (USSR) c. democracy: government by the people; two forms: representative & direct. (USA) d. totalitarianism: government by one or a few; total control over many aspects of people‟s lives; no/limited freedoms (USSR) e. individualism: stresses the need for people to do things on their own; competition-the best individuals reach higher levels of power, status or money. (USA) f. collectivism: stresses the need for people to work together to benefit the whole; “all for one and one for all”. (USSR) g. freedom: the condition of being free; highly valued: freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom to do business. (USA) h. equality: condition of being equal; highly valued: basic needs-food, housing, education and jobs-supplied for all people (USSR) USA = equality before the law & equality of opportunity USSR = equality of condition 2. Locate the important regions of conflict during the Cold War: Soviet Union, West/East Germany, West/East Berlin, Poland, Hungary, Greece, Turkey, Czechoslovakia, North Korea, South Korea, the 38th parallel, Cuba, China, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, the 17th parallel. Be prepared to find each country/city on a world map. 3. Define terms important to the Cold War Era: a. Cold War: a period of hostility between the U.S. and Soviet Union: includes the nuclear arms race, the space race, and wars fought “by proxy” b. Iron Curtain: term coined by Winston Churchill-represents the buffer zone of countries around the Soviet Union c. containment: policy supported in the Truman Doctrine: U.S. would work to restrict the spread of communism around the word 4. Describe the roots of the Cold War: Economic and Military Alliances: a. Marshall Plan: U.S. plan to aid the rebuilding of Western European countries after WWII. Countries had to agree to buy American products. $17 billion in aid b. Molotov Plan: Soviet plan to counter the Marshall Plan. Offered aid to Eastern European countries to keep them from joining the Marshall Plan. c. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): Military alliance between the U.S., Canada, France, Great Britain, Italy, & the Netherlands. Built to protect countries from Soviet (communist) expansion. d. Warsaw Pact: Military alliance between Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and the Soviet Union. e. Truman Doctrine: President Truman‟s foreign policy: justified U.S. intervention to stop the spread of communism. Introduced idea of “containment” = restrict the spread of communism. Used to aid Greece & Turkey. Events: f. the development of nuclear weapons (the arms race): Competition between the U.S. and Soviets as military superpowers. Each side believed having more weapons than the other would keep each other “in check”. Increased fear & suspicion between the countries. g. the Berlin Crisis: The East German city of Berlin was cut off by a Soviet blockade. The U.S. airlifted supplies to the people of Berlin to keep millions from starving. The Soviet Union responded by building a wall around West Berlin to keep East Germans out. h. the Korean War: North Korea (aided by the Soviet Union & China) invaded South Korea in June 1950. The U.S. sent troops to try to push the North Koreans out. General Douglas MacArthur led a successful ground invasion & had the North Koreans pushed almost to the China border, but 1 million Chinese troops pushed the American & South Korean forces south of the capital Seoul. The war ended after 3 years in a stalemate (July 1953). U.S. casualties topped 130,000. Korean & Chinese casualties topped 2 million. This war represents the U.S. and Soviet Union fighting “by proxy”. 5. Describe and give reasons for the rise of McCarthyism in the United States: a. description: the practice of making accusations of disloyalty to the U.S. or accusing people to be communists during the Cold War (early 1950s) without any proof or evidence. Teachers, government workers, and entertainment industry were favorite targets. Led to the Communist Control Act of 1954. b. reasons for: Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin preyed upon Americans‟ fears and suspicions to accuse people of be- ing “red” or „pinks” and to root out communism in the U.S. He interrogated people in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee but never proved anyone of being conspirators. 6. Describe and evaluate the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis. A U-2 spy plane discovered that the Soviet Union was installing nuclear missiles onto the island of Cu- ba in October 1962. These short range missiles could have reached most major cities in the U.S. within minutes. President Kennedy set up a U.S. Navy blockade “quarantine” around the island of Cuba to stop advancing Soviet ships loaded with nuclear materials. The world was concerned nuclear war would break out. The Soviet ships turned back & Khrushchev agreed to move the missiles out of Cuba if the U.S. agreed to stay out of Cuba & removed the blockade, (Kennedy also secretly agreed to remove our missiles from Turkey). 7. Define terms important to the Vietnam War: a. domino theory: American fear that if one country in a region fell to communism the whole region would also fall to communism-coined by President D. D. Eisenhower used to assist South Vietnam b. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution: passed by Congress-gave the President (Johnson) the authority to “take all necessary measures” to defend the U.S. and repel any armed attack c. search and destroy missions: U.S. strategy in Vietnam: U.S. patrols searched for hidden enemy camps, then destroyed them with massive firepower and air raids. Troops in helicopters were then sent in d. napalm: jellied gasoline bomb--burned anything it touched caused terrible casualties increased unpopularity of the war in U.S. e. Twenty-sixth Amendment: ratified in 1971, lowered federal voting age from 21 to 18 passed in response to the Vietnam War--soldiers could fight at 18, but not vote until 21. f. War Powers Act: passed in 1973: requires the President to get congressional approval before committing U.S. troops to an armed struggle. 8. Describe U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. a. Reasons for involvement: the U.S. wanted to stop the spread of communism from North Vietnam to South Vietnam (domino theory, containment theory, Truman Doctrine) b. Hardships faced by U.S. soldiers: wet, dense jungle terrain; elusive enemy; flooded rice fields; 100 degree heat; monsoons-rain; leeches; land mines & traps; Ho Chi Minh Trail; VC tunnel system; waning U.S. support for the war; exposure to Agent Orange 8. c. Reasons for growing disillusionment: Americans began to question U.S. involvement in the war: did the Vietnamese want us there? Wasn‟t it a Vietnamese civil war?; more troops meant more casualties; horrifying images on TV; concerned about high number of civilian casualties; use of napalm; war continued for years with no end in sight d. Violence at Home during the war: anti-war protests spread across the U.S. JFK‟s/Dr. King‟s/Robert Kennedy‟s assassinations Jackson State University (2 killed 9 wounded by police) Kent State University (4 killed by Ohio National Guard) e. Violence abroad during the war: My Lai Massacre: March 16, 1968--30 U.S. soldiers killed 200 civilians bombings in Cambodia & Laos f. End of the war: “Tet Offensive”: major surprise attack on S. Vietnam cities on Jan. 31, 1968 (killed 2,000 Americans & 50,000 NVA and VC). Seen as turning point in the war as media covered it as an emotional victory for the N. Vietnamese Vietnamization: plan by Nixon & Kissinger to pull out U.S. troops and turn war over to the South Vietnamese January 27, 1973-after 5 years of negotiations--cease-fire; allowed 150,000 N.V. soldiers to re- main in the South; South leader stayed in power; U.S. left by March 1973 Fighting between N & S began again--South surrendered on April 30, 1975 3 million Americans served (58,000 died; 303,000 injured; 750 POWs; 2,000 MIA) 4 million Vietnamese killed or injured (1/2 civilians) Veterans had lasting effects of Agent Orange, depression, drug & alcohol addiction 9. Evaluate the escalating arms race of the Cold War. 10. Analyze events of the late Cold War (1970-1990) and the end of the Cold War. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War
    Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 British Imperialism, Public Opinion and the Coming of the Cold War JOHN SAKKAS Harrassowitz Verlag (Germany, 2013), 149 pp/28 illust. ISBN: 978-3-447-06718-8 The Greek civil war holds a significant place in the history of twentieth-century Europe for many reasons. Firstly, it was Europe’s bloodiest conflict in the second half of the 1940s; secondly, it marked a turning point in the Cold War; and lastly, it showed how Greece had become an ‘apple of discord’ for both American and Soviet involvement in Greek affairs which led to even more complexity in the country’s post-war politics. Yet despite its significance, only a limited number of studies have been carried out on the subject of this era. After the troubled period of the 1950s and 1960s, a time dominated by extreme conservatism, anti-communism and nationalist paroxysms, it was difficult to access material sources and this made it nearly impossible to conduct scholarly research, so that older politically-charged interpretations and accounts went mostly unchallenged. However, in the past two decades a new historiographical current has developed as regards the civil war in Greece and new evaluations and debates have emerged that shed fresh light on conventional supposition. Britain and the Greek Civil War, 1944–1949 draws upon the author’s doctoral dissertation and provides a welcome addition to studies on that period in Greek history. John Sakkas takes up a novel approach that does not focus solely on Greek politics, whether they are national or local, nor does it centre simply on British policy in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Truman Doctrine (1947)
    Harry S. Truman Truman Doctrine (1947) Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Members of the Congress of the United States: The gravity of the situation which confronts the world today necessitates my appearance before a joint session of the Congress. The foreign policy and the national security of this country are involved. One aspect of the present situation, which I wish to present to you at this time for your consideration and decision, concerns Greece and Turkey. The United States has received from the Greek Government an urgent appeal for financial and economic assistance. Preliminary reports from the American Economic Mission now in Greece and reports from the American Ambassador in Greece corroborate the statement of the Greek Government that assistance is imperative if Greece is to survive as a free nation. I do not believe that the American people and the Congress wish to turn a deaf ear to the appeal of the Greek Government. Greece is not a rich country. Lack of sufficient natural resources has always forced the Greek people to work hard to make both ends meet. Since 1940, this industrious and peace loving country has suffered invasion, four years of cruel enemy occupation, and bitter internal strife. When forces of liberation entered Greece they found that the retreating Germans had destroyed virtually all the railways, roads, port facilities, communications, and merchant marine. More than a thousand villages had been burned. Eighty-five per cent of the children were tubercular. Livestock, poultry, and draft animals had almost disappeared. Inflation had wiped out practically all savings. As a result of these tragic conditions, a militant minority, exploiting human want and misery, was able to create political chaos which, until now, has made economic recovery impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold War Vocab Packet
    Aftermath of World War II Term/Person/Event Definition Processing World Bank Why is this an important te rm to remember about Created by US and 43 the Aftermath of WWII? other nations to provide development and reconstruction loans United Nations Find three additional facts about this organization. A new international peacekeeping organization formed after WWII Nuremberg War Crimes Find three additional facts about this event. Trials A series of trials in 1945 and 1946 in which former Nazi leaders were convicted of war crimes GI Bill of Rights Why is this an important term to remember about the Aftermath of WWII? Provided federal funds to help returning GIs transition to civilian life. Isolationism How can you best remember the meaning of this word? A government policy of not taking part in economic and political alliances or relations with other countries Internationalism What are three examples of h ow the United States took an internationalist approach after WWII? A policy of creating strong economic and diplomatic ties between nations Universal Declaration of How can you best remember the meaning of this Human Rights word? Affirmed the rights to life, liberty, and equality before the law and to freedom of religion, expression, and assembly Origins of the Cold War Term/Person/Event Definition Processing How can you best remember the meaning of Cold War The struggle between the this term? Communist world led by the Soviet Union and the non- Communist world led by the U.S. Yalta Conference What important decisions were made at this conference? Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill met at this conference in the Soviet city of Yalta to plan for the end of WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963
    Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963 Topic: Vietnam Grade Level: 9-12 Subject Area: US History after World War II Time Required: 1 class period Goals/Rationale In the winter of 1963, the eyes of most Americans were not on Vietnam. However, Vietnam would soon become a battleground familiar to all Americans. In this lesson plan, students analyze a letter to President Kennedy from a woman who had just lost her brother in South Vietnam and consider Kennedy’s reply, explaining his rationale for sending US military personnel there. Essential Question: What were the origins of US involvement in Vietnam prior to its engagement of combat troops? Objectives Students will: analyze primary sources. discuss US involvement in the Vietnam conflict prior to 1963. evaluate the “domino theory” from the historical perspective of Americans living in 1963. Connections to Curriculum (Standards) National Standards: National Center for History in the Schools Era 9 - Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s), 2B - The student understands United States foreign policy in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. Era 9, 2C - The student understands the foreign and domestic consequences of US involvement in Vietnam. Massachusetts Frameworks US II.20 – Explain the causes, course and consequences of the Vietnam War and summarize the diplomatic and military policies of Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. Prior Knowledge Students should have a working knowledge of the Cold War. They should be able to analyze primary sources. Prepared by the Department of Education and Public Programs, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Historical Background and Context After World War II, the French tried to re-establish their colonial control over Vietnam, the most strategic of the three states comprising the former Indochina (Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric and Reality
    History Studies Volume 13 History Studies Volume 13 information on Walsh, but he was still dismissed by the Catholic Church. After his sacking Jimmy Walsh was Rhetoric and Reality -A History of the Formation employed as a hospital porter, but spent the rest of his life of the 'Domino Theory' trying to enter various religious orders, becoming a novice in a Luke Butterly Benedictine Monastery. He was unsuccessful in these attempts Gaps between rhetoric and reality in U.S. foreign however because he had once been married and was now policy have often been large; indeed such gaps might be said to constitute a defining characteristic of this separated. Jimmy Walsh died after a prolonged illness on 12 nation's diplomacy. I March 1977. and was buried in Sydney. He had never returned 76 to treland. When U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower announced the 'domino theory' at a news conference in 1954, he was not announcing a radical departure in Washington's understanding of the emerging situation in Indochina. Rather, he was making public aspects of U.S. foreign policy that had been in the making since the end of World War ll, which in turn interacted with older themes. This essay will first situate this 'theory' in the historiography of the Vietnam War in order to contextualise what follows. It will then map the formation of the domino theory from 1945 to 1954, and will briefly look at the broader implications of such an approach in foreign policy. This will be achieved by examining the secondary literature on the various historical events covered and reviewing the relevant primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of the Cold War
    Timeline of the Cold War 1945 Defeat of Germany and Japan February 4-11: Yalta Conference meeting of FDR, Churchill, Stalin - the 'Big Three' Soviet Union has control of Eastern Europe. The Cold War Begins May 8: VE Day - Victory in Europe. Germany surrenders to the Red Army in Berlin July: Potsdam Conference - Germany was officially partitioned into four zones of occupation. August 6: The United States drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima (20 kiloton bomb 'Little Boy' kills 80,000) August 8: Russia declares war on Japan August 9: The United States drops atomic bomb on Nagasaki (22 kiloton 'Fat Man' kills 70,000) August 14 : Japanese surrender End of World War II August 15: Emperor surrender broadcast - VJ Day 1946 February 9: Stalin hostile speech - communism & capitalism were incompatible March 5 : "Sinews of Peace" Iron Curtain Speech by Winston Churchill - "an "iron curtain" has descended on Europe" March 10: Truman demands Russia leave Iran July 1: Operation Crossroads with Test Able was the first public demonstration of America's atomic arsenal July 25: America's Test Baker - underwater explosion 1947 Containment March 12 : Truman Doctrine - Truman declares active role in Greek Civil War June : Marshall Plan is announced setting a precedent for helping countries combat poverty, disease and malnutrition September 2: Rio Pact - U.S. meet 19 Latin American countries and created a security zone around the hemisphere 1948 Containment February 25 : Communist takeover in Czechoslovakia March 2: Truman's Loyalty Program created to catch Cold War
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 32 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2017) The Formation of the Bipolar Structure of International Finance after World War II Angang Li Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies in ASEAN Zhejiang Police College Hangzhou, China Abstract—The devastating blow brought by the Second was generally declined and the British completely lost the World War not only changed the international political and international financial dominance, especially United States, economic situation, but also prompted the international as a capitalist upstart, undertook, by advantages of economic, community to reflect on the meaning of war, which laid the political and military, the leadership work of post-war foundation for peace and development after the war and made reconstruction, intended to dominate the development of postwar reconstruction become the primary goal of all international finance, established their own dominance in the countries. However, cooperation and development failed to not capitalist world, and made material preparations for the completely cross the ideological bondage and expressed in the upcoming the struggle for hegemony. form the integral confrontation of the ideological, that is, the confrontation between capitalism and socialism. This is also In 1945, after the death of Roosevelt, "Brandenburg what the concept of structural differences cannot be avoided. A dynasty miracle" which was excepted by Hitler and Yi Pei Er single country could be materially constrained in the sieged in Berlin did not repeated, the power vacuum caused development by the lack of production factors, but the cluster by the collapse of the Nazi German reconstructed the power advantage brought by the group of countries could make up pattern of the international system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Did America’S Search for a “New Normal” Strike a Balance Between Individual (Freedoms And) Opportunities and National Security in the Postwar Years?
    MI OPEN BOOK PROJECT UnitedReconstruction to Today States History Kimberly Eikenberry, Troy Kilgus, Adam Lincoln, Kim Noga, LaRissa Paras, Mark Radcliffe, Dustin Webb, Heather Wolf The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC-BY-NC-SA) license as part of Michigan’s participation in the national #GoOpen movement. This is version 1.4 of this resource, released August 2018 Information on the latest version and updates are available on the project homepage: http://textbooks.wmisd.org/dashboard.html ii Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA The Michigan Open Book About the Authors - United States History - Reconstruction - Today Project Kimberly Eikenberry Grand Haven High School Grand Haven Area Public Schools Kim has a B.A. in History and Social Studies and a M.A. in Educational Leadership, both from Project Manager: Dave Johnson, Wexford- Western Michigan University. She has served in many roles during her thirteen years as an Missaukee Intermediate School District educator, including department chair, curriculum director, and administrator. Kim currently teaches World History and Economics at Grand Haven High School. HS US Team Editor: Rebecca Bush, Ottawa Area Intermediate School District Authors Troy Kilgus Kimberly Eikenberry, Grand Haven Public Standish-Sterling Central High School Schools Standish-Sterling Community Schools Troy Kilgus serves as the high school social studies chair at Standish-Sterling Central High Troy Kilgus, Standish-Sterling Schools School. In his eight years of teaching, he has taught various social studies courses includ- ing AP US History and multiple levels of French. Mr. Kilgus earned his undergraduate de- Adam Lincoln, Ithaca Schools gree in French Education and his Masters in Teaching from Saginaw Valley State Univer- sity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truman Doctrine: Turkey
    The Truman Doctrine: Turkey By JOSEPH C. SATTERTHWAITE ABSTRACT: On February 21, 1947, the U.S. government was informed by the British government that by April 1 it would have to discontinue, because of its own difficulties, its military and economic aid to Greece and Turkey. It hoped the United States could take over this burden in both countries. Presi- dent Truman and the State, War, and Navy departments at once realized that unless the United States did so, Greece would be taken over by its communist partisans strongly sup- ported by the Soviet government working through the com- munist Bulgarian and Yugoslav governments; that if this happened Turkey would find itself in an untenable position in spite of its large but antiquated army; and that the eastern Mediterranean and the Near East in that event would inevi- tably fall under communist domination. In a dramatic mes- sage to Congress on March 12, 1947, President Truman said that the U.S. must take immediate and resolute action to sup- port Greece and Turkey. The Congress, after extensive hear- ings, approved this historic change in U.S. foreign policy in a bill signed May 22, known as Public Law 75. Out of the President’s message came the Truman Doctrine. The principle of assistance to countries of the free world under the threat of communist aggression having been accepted by the Congress, the Marshall Plan followed not long after. The military and economic aid given Turkey in the ensuing years was highly effective: the U.S. probably received more per dollar advanced than in any other country, at least for the period of this study —which ends with the signing of the CENTO (Baghdad) Pact in 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragedy of American Diplomacy? Rethinking the Marshall Plan
    LSE Research Online Article (refereed) Michael Cox and Caroline Kennedy-Pipe The tragedy of American diplomacy? Rethinking the Marshall Plan Originally published in Journal of Cold War studies, 7 (1), pp. 97-134 © 2005 MIT Press. You may cite this version as: Cox, Michael and Kennedy-Pipe, Caroline (2005). The tragedy of American diplomacy? Rethinking the Marshall Plan [online]. London: LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000764 Available online: May 2006 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk Contact LSE Research Online at: [email protected] CoxThe Tragedyand Kennedy-Pipe of American Diplomacy? Special Forum: The Marshall Plan and the Origins of the Cold War Reassessed The Tragedy of American Diplomacy? Rethinking the Marshall Plan ✣ Rethinking the Cold War If we take seriously E. H. Carr’s dictum that history is not a single, well- deªned narrative but a terrain of contestation between competing and evolv- ing interpretations whose inºuence is as much shaped by time and place as by any given set of facts, it should come as no great shock to discover that the past is constantly being reassessed or, to use the more familiar term, “revised” by successive generations of historians.1 The post-1945 period in general, and the Cold War conºict in particular, has been no exception to this simple but im- portant historiographic rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Pcr 419 Course Title: International Politics of the Cold War (1945
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE COURSE CODE: PCR 419 COURSE TITLE: INTERNATIONAL POLITICS OF THE COLD WAR (1945 - 1991) 1 PCR 419 INTERNATIONAL POLITICS OF THE COLD WAR (1945 - 1991) Course Developer/Writer: Mathias Jarikre Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution School of Arts and Social Sciences National Open University of Nigeria Course Editor Course Coordinator Mathias Jarikre Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution School of Arts and Social Sciences National Open University of Nigeria 2 NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA National Open University of Nigeria University Village Plot 91, Cadastral Zone Nnamdi Azikiwe Expressway Jabi, Abuja Nigeria Lagos Office 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island, Lagos E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.nouedu.net Published by: National Open University of Nigeria Printed 2017 ISBN: All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENT Module 1 International Politics of the Cold War Unit 1 International Politics Unit 2 Polarity Unit 3 History of Cold War Unit 4 Chronicles of Cold War Unit 5 Causes and Consequences of the Cold War Module 2 Cold War as Social Conflict Unit 1 Approaches to Cold War Unit 2 Cold War as Social Conflict Unit 3 Iron Curtains Unit 4 Berlin Blockade and Airlift Unit 5 Berlin Wall Module 3 Cold War Strategies Unit 1 Marshall Plan Unit 2 Molotov Plan Unit 3 Containment Unit 4 Deterrence Unit 5 Detente Module 4 Military Alliances and Nuclear Weapons Unit 1 North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Unit 2 Warsaw Pact Unit 3 The Role of Nuclear Weapons Unit 4 Arms
    [Show full text]