DOCSLIB.ORG

Iucn Water and Nature Initiative Pangani Basin Water Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iucn Water and Nature Initiative Pangani Basin Water Board IUCN WATER AND NATURE INITIATIVE PANGANI BASIN WATER BOARD 1 PANGANI RIVER BASIN FLOW ASSESSMENT Fish and invertebrate life histories and important fisheries of the Pangani River Basin O. Hamerlynck, M.D. Richmond, A. Mohammed and S.R. Mwaitega January 2008 1 As of 2010, Pangani Basin Water Office is known as Pangani Basin Water Board Published by: Pangani Basin Water Board (PBWB) International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Copyright: © 2010 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Pangani Basin Water Board This publication may be produced in whole or part and in any form for education or non-profit uses, without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. IUCN would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication which uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without the prior written permission of IUCN. Citation: PWBO/IUCN. 2008. Fish and invertebrate life histories and important fisheries of the Pangani River Basin. Pangani River Basin Flow Assessment. Pangani Basin Water Board, Moshi and IUCN Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Programme. 63 pp. Available from: IUCN - ESARO Publications Service Unit , P. O. Box 68200 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya; Telephone ++ 254 20 890605-12; Fax ++ 254 20 890615; E-mail: [email protected] The designations of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The opinions expressed by the authors in this publication do not necessarily represent the view of PBWB, EU, UNDP GEF, WANI or IUCN. Pangani River Basin Flow Assessment - Specialist Study Fish and invertebrate life histories and important fisheries of the Pangani River Basin, Tanzania FINAL REPORT Hamerlynck, O., Richmond, M.D., Mohammed, A. & Mwaitega, S.R. January 2008 for Pangani Basin Water Office, Moshi and IUCN, Dar es Salaam Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................5 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background to Pangani River Basin Management Programme.............................................................. 6 1.2 Objectives of the study ............................................................................................................................ 7 2 METHODS................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Desk study............................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Field visit.................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Water conductivity, chlorophyll and plankton measurements................................................. 9 2.2.2 Fish species diversity and specimen collection .................................................................... 10 2.3 Sources of additional fisheries data ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Hydrological data................................................................................................................................... 11 3 MAIN AQUATIC BIOTOPES OF THE PANGANI BASIN...................................................... 12 3.1 Water conductivity within the Pangani River Basin ...............................................................................12 3.2 Rapids, waterfalls and mountain streams ............................................................................................. 12 3.3 Main Rivers............................................................................................................................................ 14 3.3.1 Pangani River........................................................................................................................ 14 3.3.2 Mkomazi River....................................................................................................................... 15 3.4 Floodplains and marginal waters........................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Lakes and reservoirs ............................................................................................................................. 17 3.5.1 Lake Chala ............................................................................................................................ 17 3.5.2 Lake Jipe ............................................................................................................................... 18 3.5.3 Lake Karamba ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.4 Lake Manga........................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.5 Kalimawe Reservoir ..............................................................................................................19 3.5.6 Nyumba ya Mungu Reservoir................................................................................................ 20 3.6 Pangani Estuary .................................................................................................................................... 21 3.6.1 Intertidal zone........................................................................................................................ 21 3.6.2 Shallow subtidal zone............................................................................................................ 21 4 IMPORTANT FISHES OF THE PANGANI RIVER BASIN..................................................... 23 4.1 Overview of fish diversity....................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 Important fish species, their biology, life histories and links to river flow .............................................. 24 4.2.1 Family Cichlidae.................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.2 Family Cyprinidae.................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.3 Family Characidae ................................................................................................................ 28 4.2.4 Family Clariidae..................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.5 Family Mochokidae ...............................................................................................................29 4.2.6 Family Mormyridae................................................................................................................ 29 4.2.7 Fish distribution ..................................................................................................................... 30 4.2.8 Fish breeding guilds .............................................................................................................. 30 5 IMPORTANT CRUSTACEA OF THE PANGANI RIVER BASIN........................................... 32 5.1 Overview of crustacean diversity........................................................................................................... 32 5.2 Important Crustaceans, their biology, life histories and links to river flow............................................. 32 5.2.1 Family Potamonautidae ........................................................................................................ 33 5.2.2 Family Portunidae ................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.3 Family Penaeidae.................................................................................................................. 34 5.2.4 Family Palaemonidae............................................................................................................ 34 SAMAKI Consultants Ltd - Pangani River Basin Specialist Study: 2 Fish and invertebrate life histories and important fisheries – Final Report 6 FISHERIES OF THE PANGANI RIVER BASIN..................................................................... 35 6.1 Overview of the fisheries management of the Pangani River Basin ..................................................... 35 6.2 Floodplains and marginal waters........................................................................................................... 35 6.3 Lake Chala............................................................................................................................................. 36 6.4 Lake Jipe ............................................................................................................................................... 37 6.5 Kalimawe Reservoir..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Lates Niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nile Perch (Lates niloticus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary Web Version – September 2014 Photo: © Biopix: N Sloth 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Schofield (2011): “Much of central, western and eastern Africa: Nile River (below Murchison Falls), as well as the Congo, Niger, Volga, Senegal rivers and lakes Chad and Turkana (Greenwood 1966 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also present in the brackish Lake Mariot near Alexandria, Egypt.” Lates niloticus Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Web Version - 8/14/2012 Status in the United States From Schofield (2011): “Scientists from Texas traveled to Tanzania in 1974-1975 to investigate the introduction potential of Lates spp. into Texas reservoirs (Thompson et al. 1977 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Temperature tolerance and trophic dynamics were studied for three species (L. angustifrons, L. microlepis and L. mariae). Subsequently, several individuals of these three species were shipped to Heart of the Hills Research Station (HOHRS) in Ingram, Texas in 1975 (Rutledge and Lyons 1976 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Also in 1975, Nile perch (L. niloticus) were transferred from Lake Turkana, Kenya, to HOHRS. All fishes were held in indoor, closed-circulating systems (Rutledge and Lyons 1976).” “From 1978 to 1985, Lates spp. was released into various Texas reservoirs (Howells and Garrett 1992 [cited by Schofield (2011) but not accessed for this report]). Almost 70,000 Lates spp. larvae were stocked into Victor Braunig (Bexar Co.), Coleto Creek (Goliad Co.) and Fairfield (Freestone Co.) reservoirs between 1978 and 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Variation in Cichlid Fish
    Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 24 (2013) 516–528 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/semcdb Review Colour variation in cichlid fish: Developmental mechanisms, selective pressures and evolutionary consequences a,∗ b,1 Martine E. Maan , Kristina M. Sefc a University of Groningen, Behavioural Biology, PO Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands b Institute of Zoology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria a r a t b i c s t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: Cichlid fishes constitute one of the most species-rich families of vertebrates. In addition to complex social Available online 9 May 2013 behaviour and morphological versatility, they are characterised by extensive diversity in colouration, both within and between species. Here, we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying colour Keywords: variation in this group and the selective pressures responsible for the observed variation. We specifically Cichlidae address the evidence for the hypothesis that divergence in colouration is associated with the evolution Natural selection of reproductive isolation between lineages. While we conclude that cichlid colours are excellent models Pigmentation for understanding the role of animal communication in species divergence, we also identify taxonomic Polymorphism and methodological biases in the current research effort. We suggest that the integration of genomic Sexual selection Speciation approaches with ecological and behavioural studies, across the entire cichlid family and beyond it, will contribute to the utility of the cichlid model system for understanding the evolution of biological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Fisheries Assessment Report Mara River Basin, Tanzania
    Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Fisheries Assessment Report Mara River Basin, Tanzania Mkindo River Catchment, Wami RivrBasin, Tanzania |i Integrated Management of Coastal and Freshwater Systems Program Fisheries in Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Baseline Survey of Fisheries Resources in the Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Mara River Basin, Tanzania Mara Basin, Tanzania Fisheries in Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay Funding for this publication was provided by the people of the United States of America through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), as a component of the Integrated Management of Coastal and Freshwater Systems Leader with Associates (LWA) Agreement No. EPP-A-00-04-00015-00. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Agency for International Development of the United States Government or Florida International University. Copyright © Global Water for Sustainability Program – Florida International University This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of the publication may be made for resale or for any commercial purposes whatsoever without the prior permission in writing from the Florida International University - Global Water for Sustainability Program. Any inquiries can be addressed to the same at the following address: Global Water for Sustainability Program Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus 3000 NE 151 St. ACI-267 North Miami, FL 33181 USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.globalwaters.net For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as: Baseline Survey of Fisheries Resources in the Mara Swamp and Musoma Bay, Mara6 Basin, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Removal of Reproductive Suppression Reveals Latent Sex Differences In
    Swift-Gallant et al. Biology of Sex Differences (2015) 6:31 DOI 10.1186/s13293-015-0050-x RESEARCH Open Access Removal of reproductive suppression reveals latent sex differences in brain steroid hormone receptors in naked mole-rats, Heterocephalus glaber Ashlyn Swift-Gallant1, Kaiguo Mo1, Deane E. Peragine1, D. Ashley Monks1,2 and Melissa M. Holmes1,2,3* Abstract Background: Naked mole-rats are eusocial mammals, living in large colonies with a single breeding female and 1–3 breeding males. Breeders are socially dominant, and only the breeders exhibit traditional sex differences in circulating gonadal steroid hormones and reproductive behaviors. Non-reproductive subordinates also fail to show sex differences in overall body size, external genital morphology, and non-reproductive behaviors. However, subordinates can transition to breeding status if removed from their colony and housed with an opposite-sex conspecific, suggesting the presence of latent sex differences. Here, we assessed the expression of steroid hormone receptor and aromatase messenger RNA (mRNA) in the brains of males and females as they transitioned in social and reproductive status. Methods: We compared in-colony subordinates to opposite-sex subordinate pairs that were removed from their colony for either 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, or until they became breeders (i.e., produced a litter). Diencephalic tissue was collected and mRNA of androgen receptor (Ar), estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1), progesterone receptor (Pgr), and aromatase (Cyp19a1) was measured using qPCR. Testosterone, 17β-estradiol, and progesterone from serum were also measured. Results: As early as 1 week post-removal, males exhibited increased diencephalic Ar mRNA and circulating testosterone, whereas females had increased Cyp19a1 mRNA in the diencephalon.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibious Fishes: Terrestrial Locomotion, Performance, Orientation, and Behaviors from an Applied Perspective by Noah R
    AMPHIBIOUS FISHES: TERRESTRIAL LOCOMOTION, PERFORMANCE, ORIENTATION, AND BEHAVIORS FROM AN APPLIED PERSPECTIVE BY NOAH R. BRESSMAN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVESITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2020 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Miriam A. Ashley-Ross, Ph.D., Advisor Alice C. Gibb, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Bill Conner, Ph.D. Glen Mars, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my adviser Dr. Miriam Ashley-Ross for mentoring me and providing all of her support throughout my doctoral program. I would also like to thank the rest of my committee – Drs. T. Michael Anderson, Glen Marrs, Alice Gibb, and Bill Conner – for teaching me new skills and supporting me along the way. My dissertation research would not have been possible without the help of my collaborators, Drs. Jeff Hill, Joe Love, and Ben Perlman. Additionally, I am very appreciative of the many undergraduate and high school students who helped me collect and analyze data – Mark Simms, Tyler King, Caroline Horne, John Crumpler, John S. Gallen, Emily Lovern, Samir Lalani, Rob Sheppard, Cal Morrison, Imoh Udoh, Harrison McCamy, Laura Miron, and Amaya Pitts. I would like to thank my fellow graduate student labmates – Francesca Giammona, Dan O’Donnell, MC Regan, and Christine Vega – for their support and helping me flesh out ideas. I am appreciative of Dr. Ryan Earley, Dr. Bruce Turner, Allison Durland Donahou, Mary Groves, Tim Groves, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, UF Tropical Aquaculture Lab for providing fish, animal care, and lab space throughout my doctoral research.
    [Show full text]
  • Pangani Basin: a Situation Analysis
    Pangani Basin: A Situation Analysis IUCN Eastern Africa Programme 2003 i Published by: Copyright: © 2003 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources This publication may be produced in whole or part and in any form for education or non-profit uses, without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. IUCN would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication which uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without the prior written permission of IUCN. Citation: IUCN Eastern Africa Programme, 2003. The Pangani River Basin: A Situation Analysis, xvi + 104pp. ISBN: 2-8317-0760-9 Design and layout: Gordon O. Arara Printed by: ScanHouse Press Ltd. Photo 1: The summit of Mount Kilimanjaro; Photo 2: Forest stand at 1 Shire Njoro; Photo 3: Gate controlling the release of water into irrigation furrows; Photo 4: Children swimming in an irrigation 3 4 reservoir; Photo 5: Sisal plantations; Photo 6: Irrigated rice scheme; 2 Photo 7: Water gauging station at Chemka Spring; Photo 8: Vandalized gate controlling the release of water into irrigation furrows; Photo 9: 5 Dam wall at Nyumba ya Mungu Reservoir (color changes mark the declining water levels); Photo 10: A vendor sells water from a borehole 6 9 10 Photos 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 copyright 2003 Kelly West; Photos 2, 7 7 8 copyright 2002 Kim Geheb; Photos 4, 10 copyright 2003 Ger Bergkamp. Available from: IUCN- EARO Publications Service Unit, P. O. Box 68200 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya; Telephone ++ 254 20 890605-12; Fax ++ 254 20 890615; E-mail: [email protected] The designations of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the participating organiza- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or con- cerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarias Gariepinus) Production in Africa
    Sudan University of Science and Technology College of animal production Science and Technology Department Of fisheries and wild life science Spawning and Rearing Performance of African Catfish (Clariasgarpinauis )larvae to Fingerlings Stage: by using anural Hormone (CPG) and synisitic Hormones (Ova prim and HCG ) فقس ورعايت سوك القرهىط اﻻفريقي هي طىر اليرقاث إلى طىر اﻻصبعياث بإستخذام الهرهىى الطبيعي )الغذة الٌخاهيت للكارب ( والهرهىًاث الصٌاعيت ) اوفا برين و الغذد التٌاسليت الوشيويت البشريت( A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement of the B.Sc. Degree in Fisheries and Wildlife Science (Honor) By: Israa Mohammed Abdallah HawazenAbdalrahman Ibrahim Omnia Ibrahim Musa Supervisor: Dr. Asaad H. Widaa October 2016 1 اﻵيــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــة ﭧ ﭨ ﭷ ﭸ ﭹ ﭺ ﭻ ﭽ ﯱ ﯲ ﯳ ﯴ ﯵ ﯶ ﯷ ﯸ ﯹ ﯺ ﯻ ﯼ ﯽ ﯾ ﯿ ﰀ ﰁ ﰂ ﰃ ﭼ صدق اهلل العظيم الكهف: ٩٠١ I DEDICATION TO MY LOVELY FAMILY TO ALL TO MY FRIENDS WITH ALL OUR DOAA II Acknowledgement All gratitude is goes to Allah who guided us to bring forth to light this project. We feel indebted to our supervisor Dr.Asaad H. Widaa for his skilful guidance and invaluable suggestion at various stages of this work, we simply cannot find the right words to express our gratitude to him, patience, advice and unlimited support were our light to find out our way throughout the project period. Special thanks are also due to Dr. Mohammed Abdelrahman ,JafeerAllsir ,our uncle Mustafa , Ass. Prof. OmimaNasir ,for their unwavering support and encouragement .Our sincere thanks also extends to all members of our department and faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfactory Sensitivity to Steroid Glucuronates in Mozambique Tilapia
    © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) 217, 4203-4212 doi:10.1242/jeb.111518 RESEARCH ARTICLE Olfactory sensitivity to steroid glucuronates in Mozambique tilapia suggests two distinct and specific receptors for pheromone detection Tina Keller-Costa1,2, Adelino V. M. Canário1 and Peter C. Hubbard1,* ABSTRACT improve fertility to enhance reproductive success (Stacey, 2010; Cichlids offer an exciting opportunity to understand vertebrate Stacey and Sorensen, 2005). Pheromones may be composed of a speciation; chemical communication could be one of the drivers of single or multiple component(s) and are detected by olfactory African cichlid radiation. Chemical signals mediate key aspects in the receptors from which the signal is relayed to specific brain areas that lives of vertebrates and often are species specific. Dominant male integrate the information and trigger the appropriate behavioural Mozambique tilapia [Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters 1852)] and/or endocrine response. A simple and reliable method to study release a sex pheromone, 5β-pregnan-3α,17α,20β-triol 3-glucuronate olfactory sensitivity in freshwater fishes, and to explore whether and its 20α-epimer, via their urine. The objective of this study was to different odorants are detected by separate or shared receptors, is the assess the sensitivity, specificity and versatility of the olfactory system electro-olfactogram (EOG) (for general review see Scott and Scott- of O. mossambicus to other steroids and their conjugates using the Johnson, 2002). In EOG cross-adaption tests, the response amplitude electro-olfactogram. Oreochromis mossambicus was sensitive to to one test odorant is measured prior to adaptation and then again several 3-glucuronidated steroids, but did not respond to during adaptation to a second odorant.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Six Cultivable Fish Species from the River Owena in Nigeria and a Template For
    water Article Quantification of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Six Cultivable Fish Species from the River Owena in Nigeria and a Template for Food Safety Assessment Ayodeji O. Adegun 1, Thompson A. Akinnifesi 1, Isaac A. Ololade 1 , Rosa Busquets 2 , Peter S. Hooda 3 , Philip C.W. Cheung 4, Adeniyi K. Aseperi 2 and James Barker 2,* 1 Department of Chemical Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko P.M.B. 001, Ondo State, Nigeria; [email protected] (A.O.A.); [email protected] (T.A.A.); [email protected] (I.A.O.) 2 School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames KT1 2EE, UK; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (A.K.A.) 3 School of Engineering and the Environment, Kingston University, Kingston-on-Thames KT1 2EE, UK; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 June 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: The Owena River Basin in Nigeria is an area of agricultural importance for the production of cocoa. To optimise crop yield, the cocoa trees require spraying with neonicotinoid insecticides (Imidacloprid, Thiacloprid Acetamiprid and Thiamethoxam). It is proposed that rainwater runoff from the treated area may pollute the Owena River and that these pesticides may thereby enter the human food chain via six species of fish (Clarias gariepinus, Clarias anguillaris, Sarotherodon galilaeus, Parachanna obscura, Oreochromis niloticus and Gymnarchus niloticus) which are cultured in the river mostly for local consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia
    Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2001 Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia Edited by Magnus Torell Albert M Salamanca 2002 Published by ICLARM – The World Fish Center, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960 Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), S-105 25 (Office: Sveavagen 20, Stockholm), Stockholm, Sweden. Torell, M. and A.M. Salamanca, Editors. 1997. Institutional Issues and Perspectives in the Management of Fisheries and Coastal Resources in Southeast Asia. ICLARM Technical Report 60, 212p. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Cataloguing in Publication Data Institutional issues and perspectives in the management of fisheries and coastal resources in Southeast Asia/ editors Magnus Torell, Albert M. Salamanca. ISBN 983-2346-07-X 1. Fisheries—management – Asia Southeastern. 2. Marine resources—Asia, Southeastern. I. Torell, Magnus. II. Salamanca, Albert M. 639.20959 Managing editors: Sandra Child, Peter R Gardiner and Janet-Maychin Copyeditors: Terrence Clayton and Albert M Salamanca Indexer: Barry Howarth Layout and design: Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover concept: Albert M Salamanca Cover design: Sam Studio Graphics and Catherine Tan Lee Mei Cover: Diverse uses of the coastal zone. ISBN 983-2346-07-X ICLARM –The World Fish Center Contribution No. 1654 Printed by Sun Printers Sdn Bhd, Malaysia ICLARM-The World Fish Center is one of the 16 international research centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) that has initiated the public awareness campaign, Future Harvest. Contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations at Site 35Ti90, Tillamook, Oregon
    DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Findings: + (35TI90) County: Tillamook T/R/S: Section 25, T1S, R10W, WM Quad/Date: Tillamook, OR (1985) Project Type: Site Damage Assessment, Testing, Data Recovery, Monitoring New Prehistoric 0 Historic 0 Isolate 0 Archaeological Permit Nos.: AP-964, -1055, -1191 Curation Location: Oregon State Museum of Natural and Cultural History under Accession Number 1739 DRAFT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT SITE 35TI90, TILLAMOOK, OREGON By: Bill R. Roulette, M.A., RPA, Thomas E. Becker, M.A., RPA, Lucille E. Harris, M.A., and Erica D. McCormick, M.Sc. With contributions by: Krey N. Easton and Frederick C. Anderson, M.A. Prepared for Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Portland, OR 97201 February 3, 2012 APPLIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC., REPORT NO. 686 Archaeological Investigations at Site 35TI90, Tillamook, Oregon ABSTRACT Between April 2007 and October 2009, Applied Archaeological Research, Inc. (AAR) conducted multiple phases of archaeological investigations at the part of site 35TI90 located in the area of potential effects related to the city of Tillamook’s upgrade and expansion of its wastewater treatment plant (TWTP) located along the Trask River at the western edge of the city. Archaeological investigations described in this report include evaluative test excavations, a site damage assessment, three rounds of data recovery, investigations related to an inadvertent discovery, and archaeological monitoring.
    [Show full text]