The Jewish War
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
As Raízes Judaico-Cristãs Do Movimento Proto-Islâmico E Os Profetismos Na Península Arábica (Séc
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM HISTÓRIA PAULO RENATO SILVA DE ANDRADE RECITA , EM NOME DO TEU SENHOR: As raízes judaico-cristãs do movimento proto-islâmico e os profetismos na Península Arábica (séc. VII E.C.) Belo Horizonte 2017 PAULO RENATO SILVA DE ANDRADE RECITA , EM NOME DO TEU SENHOR: As raízes judaico-cristãs do movimento proto-islâmico e os profetismos na Península Arábica (séc. VII E.C.) Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de mestre no Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, na linha de pesquisa História e Culturas Políticas. Orientador: Prof. Dr. André Luis Pereira Miatello. Belo Horizonte 2017 FOLHA DE APROVAÇÃO Dissertação de mestrado intitulada "Recita, em nome do teu Senhor: as raízes judaico- cristãs do movimento proto-islâmico e os profetismos na península arábica (séc. VII E.C.)" , defendida pelo aluno Paulo Renato Silva de Andrade e aprovada no dia ___ de _________________ de 2017 pela banca examinadora, composta pelos seguintes professores: ____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. André Luis Pereira Miatello (orientador) ____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Tadeu Mazzola Verza (UFMG) ____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. José Antônio Dabdab Trabulsi (UFMG) AGRADECIMENTOS Qualquer tentativa sincera de agradecimento imediatamente nos remete não a uma tarefa hercúlea – visto que esta, ainda que enorme, implica em sua possível completude – mas sisífica. Não por uma suposta inutilidade do objetivo em si, mas pela futilidade do esforço, cujo ator já inicia consciente de que a pedra rolará para o pé da montanha. Ainda assim, é com a resignação otimista do Sísifo, tal como interpretado por Camus, que empreendemos a tarefa, com a mais alegre boa vontade, apesar da ciência da incomensurabilidade da gratidão que nutrimos e da incapacidade de expressá-la, em toda a sua plenitude e subjetividade. -
Notes Du Mont Royal ←
Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres FLAVII r * O P E RA: IN’ S’E’R’M 0-. gN E.-Mn--L 15.5111 151..ij 1A o L rur- ; copNVnmsnl’vanc. vrac? on axa]. 1* 3 platier Græca’denuôfumma-fidediligentiaipçoh. p H. lista-,acrplurimis-iplocis mmdgça.; N l î .’. ’’54: :17: Îfi’ïM’Îde’tliêâv MMEllitt-onepuflitubijit; . » ü hllqç’üpkçifiwimusïl un: x. " " a l1 f ’ ezjllll. j. r. "llIÏ’ÏËt&er g n s j .i l .gl- ’- cvM CÂBSARRÀE 12:11:37; gratiaæpriuilegio. BASILEKAEyEX OFFICINA . L v2 Eabniïm a. n. fin 1. - il ’ ’xfiîtw ’ ’ *TxY’P0GR.A P’H’VS LECTOR! candido . , ; Mm dzflmflaàmüa j o. s 1-: p un nojïri Mai exnnplàrid,ïtflof m i ,nominfiinufm editionem, flamand? omit-134511405 ut id . a! fammm,-ragati flâna; quôd dictïm, Opm bocpam’m rafligan’one,para tir» noua m’a»; tonner zone indigne: nonpotuimw nome ’ lm buicfetitioni mormi garera. bulles Mm qua]? Motus ardu quidam promoumdi rem litham» area fiitinmbù. Mzgiturquidinlmcnom editionepmjlitum tt,tf5iç01fiet,p4utùpèræ cçre. ANTInyTÀTvn LibresâSalgifmu’ "Geleiüà(do&i[.?imalioa qui aira, dei mlioflbmprzèlare’mefita: quodplurim dmfn-ipta teflamr)pri l r mûr» Latinitate damans, «&wa Grammdmuô , W parait-fieri dihgmufia z m3, cotgfim’ ,-’qm«i immutandafim , mandai-i canonna; 75mm dénude 011m de a a L L o 1V n A i c o Marginalilms «Annotationiiw (attrayant) l I gang Ilfiphi librhfaflumefl) exomuim, «nerf relié-t’a acrfioù, lafinüc’ftamm 123100.! coi-rafla :5qu jimicumpriori editioncbaqcconfirre leaJJdlêdca. -
Jewish Love Magic Magical and Religious Literature of Late Antiquity
Jewish Love Magic Magical and Religious Literature of Late Antiquity Series Editors Shaul Shaked Siam Bhayro volume 6 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/mrla Jewish Love Magic From Late Antiquity to the Middle Ages By Ortal-Paz Saar leiden | boston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Saar, Ortal-Paz, author. Title: Jewish love magic : from late antiquity to the Middle Ages / by Ortal-Paz Saar. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2017] | Series: Magical and religious literature of late antiquity; volume 6 | Based on the author’s thesis (doctoral) – Universiṭat Tel-Aviv, 2009. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2017017142 (print) | lccn 2017018785 (ebook) | isbn 9789004347892 (e-book) | isbn 9789004347885 (hardback : alk. paper) Subjects: lcsh: Jewish magic–History–To 1500. | Magic in rabbinical literature. | Magic, Ancient. | Love–Religious aspects–Judaism–History–To 1500. Classification: lcc bf1622.j45 (ebook) | lcc bf1622.j45 s33 2017 (print) | ddc 133.4/3089924–dc23 lc record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017017142 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 2211-016x isbn 978-90-04-34788-5 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-34789-2 (e-book) Copyright 2017 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. -
Notes Du Mont Royal ←
Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres S E P . ’lANT I (MIT AT v M * INVDAIC’A R’vM . l V :in1” XX. -’i a i ç [Adîuné’ca fait fifi-mul .Iofephi À-Vitasàb; :ipfolite-ris mandata. Omnia à SignifmundorGelenioi è Græco’înkfermOnem . fi Frtwfiflg. 4 . ,1," j . n. Latinum. «conuerfa, - i I J fiai tBEL-Lo C’J’YVDAICO- .LIBYQ on ’ grxcommwdimm; évflætz’bnoper S gelèizz’uzmg .. ’ fallu; . ’ t C o N r R A A P 1 o N EM .1 L311-3 n 1 I I. qui cùm antca corruPti-Hîfili raflent, iam .ex Græconon .cmcndàtifolùn,lèd fupplcti étiam open eiufdcm Gclcmj. j a. z N1 M ’1’ à ’12 z on in gr T Ï o iv’ 4s, finemegtuçhqbæù liber. 1.. i c i En 01011122120]? Gcleng’.mlr4*m operamfiudio ne diligenta Morguæjîj ’ ’ cg»; erèojùmmfide collatajrg luce»: denim pedum. ’ ’- locupletifliirio. .v. "’LYJWîJïUÏJ’lQ-Isv Î ., APVD. HhÆIREDES maçon; IV’NLÇTÆ. --..--... ..-......---r--æ, (à AVTORES Q-VORVM ’POTISSIMVM TESTIMONIO PARTIM COMPROBATO, partira confiitaco Iofephus hifioria: (me r fidem facit. Acufilàus Argiuus Hcfioçlus Agatharchides Gnidius Hieronymus Acgyptius Alexander Polyhil’cor Homerus , Andreas I ’ Ifidorus Apion grammaticus - T.Liuius Apollonius Molo L fimachus AriphancsApollodorus Menander ancthOn Ephefius Arifizæus Mnafeas Damafeenus BerolùsAriflotelcs Chaldæus , o i NicolausMochus Damafccnus ’ Cadmus Milcfius Pherecydcs Syrius Gallo: Chronographu: Philon Œniot Chæremon ’ Philolhatus Chœtilus poëta Polybius Megalopolltanus g ConOnDemetrius hifio. Phaleteus I Polycratcs Pofidonïus Dius hiflo. ’ Pythagoras .31 5;; ’ , phorus 4 Strabo i7g À , 1’êîîâhcmcrus lins Thcodotus Thalcs J-«. -
Alexander Janneus As High Priest and King: Struggling Between Jewish and Hellenistic Concepts of Rule
religions Article Alexander Janneus as High Priest and King: Struggling between Jewish and Hellenistic Concepts of Rule Vasile Babota Department of Biblical Theology, Faculty of Theology, Pontifical Gregorian University, Piazza della Pilotta, 4, 00187 Roma RM, Italy; [email protected] Received: 6 December 2019; Accepted: 9 January 2020; Published: 12 January 2020 Abstract: Josephus refers explicitly to Alexander Janneus in his narratives in both War and Antiquities only as king. Janneus’s high priestly office is only implied, and that in a context that is hostile to him (War 1.88//Ant. 13.372). If one looks at Josephus’s list of high priests in Ant. 20.242, there he reports that Janneus acted both as king and priest for “twenty-seven years”. Was it Josephus who did not want to refer explicitly to Janneus as high priest in his narratives, was this dictated by his source/s, or by some other reason/s? More specifically, why is there a contrast between the narratives and the list? This study adopts source-critical, comparative, and interdisciplinary approach. It also compares Janneus with other rulers from the Hellenistic world with whom he shared many characteristics. However, certain aspects make the Hasmonean high priestly monarchy unique, dictated mainly by theological reasons. That of Janneus is an example of an institutional clash. Josephus was aware of the complexity and controversial aspects surrounding the institution of Hasmonean kingship and its combination with the high priesthood. For various reasons he chose not to identify Janneus explicitly as high priest in his narratives, but rather focus mainly on the royal policy. -
Josephus' Jewish War and the Causes of the Jewish Revolt: Re-Examining Inevitability
JOSEPHUS’ JEWISH WAR AND THE C AUSES OF THE JEWISH REVOLT: RE-EXAMINING INEVITABILITY Javier Lopez, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2013 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Lopez, Javier. Josephus’ Jewish War and the Causes of the Jewish Revolt: Re-Examining Inevitability. Master of Arts (History), December 2013, 85 pp., 3 tables, 3 illustrations, bibliography, 60 titles. The Jewish revolt against the Romans in 66 CE can be seen as the culmination of years of oppression at the hands of their Roman overlords. The first-century historian Josephus narrates the developments of the war and the events prior. A member of the priestly class and a general in the war, Josephus provides us a detailed account that has long troubled historians. This book was an attempt by Josephus to explain the nature of the war to his primary audience of predominantly angry and grieving Jews. The causes of the war are explained in different terms, ranging from Roman provincial administration, Jewish apocalypticism, and Jewish internal struggles. The Jews eventually reached a tipping point and engaged the Romans in open revolt. Josephus was adamant that the origin of the revolt remained with a few, youthful individuals who were able to persuade the country to rebel. This thesis emphasizes the causes of the war as Josephus saw them and how they are reflected both within The Jewish War and the later work Jewish Antiquities. -
Flavius Josephus the WARS of the JEWS OR HISTORY of the DESTRUCTION of JERUSALEM:Index
Flavius Josephus THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM:Index. Flavius Josephus THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM General Index ■ PREFACE ■ BOOK I: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN YEARSFROM THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES, TO THE DEATH OF HEROD THE GREAT ■ BOOK II: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF SIXTY-NINE YEARSFROM THE DEATH OF HEROD TILL VESPASIAN WAS SENT TO SUBDUE THE JEWS BY NERO ■ BOOK III: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF ABOUT ONE YEARFROM VESPASIAN'S COMING TO SUBDUE THE JEWS TO THE TAKING OF GAMALA ■ BOOK IV: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF ABOUT ONE YEARFROM THE SIEGE OF GAMALA TO THE COMING OF TITUS TO BESIEGE JERUSALEM ■ BOOK V: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF NEAR SIX MONTHSFROM THE COMING OF TITUS TO BESIEGE JERUSALEM, TO THE GREAT EXTREMITY TO WHICH THE JEWS WERE REDUCED file:///D|/Documenta%20Chatolica%20Omnia/99%20-%20Pr...0Library/001%20-Da%20Fare/03/0-JosephusWarOfJews.htm (1 of 2)2006-05-31 19:54:53 Flavius Josephus THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM:Index. ■ BOOK VI: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF ABOUT ONE MONTHFROM THE GREAT EXTREMITY TO WHICH THE JEWS WERE REDUCED TO THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY TITUS ■ BOOK VII: CONTAINING THE INTERVAL OF ABOUT THREE YEARSFROM THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY TITUS TO THE SEDITION AT CYRENE file:///D|/Documenta%20Chatolica%20Omnia/99%20-%20Pr...0Library/001%20-Da%20Fare/03/0-JosephusWarOfJews.htm (2 of 2)2006-05-31 19:54:53 JOSEPHUSWAROFJEWS: PREFACE, Index. -
(Eds.), Herodium
HERODIUM Final Reports of the 1972–2010 Excavations Directed by Ehud Netzer Volume I Herod’s Tomb Precinct Roi Porat, Rachel Chachy, and Yakov Kalman with contributions by: N. Ahipaz, S. Amorai-Stark, B. Arensburg, A. Barash, A. Belfer-Cohen, R. Bouchnick, A. Ecker, E. Eshel, G. Foerster, J. Gärtner, M. Hershkovitz, S. Ilani, R.E. Jackson-Tal, I. Ktalav, T. Minster, R. Nenner-Soriano, O. Peleg-Barkat, R. Sarig, D.R. Schwartz, G.D. Stiebel, D. Wachs, and B. Zissu Israel Exploration Society Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem 2015 THIS VOLUME WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE SAMIS FOUNDATION ISBN 978-965-221-099-9 ©2015 Israel Exploration Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form (except for brief excerpts of reviewers), without permission from the publisher. Editing by Robert Amoils Layout by Avraham Pladot Typesetting by Marzel A.S. — Jerusalem Printed by Old City Press Ltd., Jerusalem Contents Samuel Israel .................................................ix–x Preface ................................................xi–xxi List of Loci .............................................xxii–xxviii List of Illustrations, Plans, Tables, and Plates ...........................xxix–xliv PART I: Introduction Chapter 1: Herodium in History (Daniel R. Schwartz)........................1–14 Chapter 2: History of Research (Rachel Chachy) ..........................15–19 PART II: Stratigraphy and Architecture Chapter 3: The Stratigraphy in the Area of Herod’s Tomb Precinct (Roi -
The Events of 1948 and the Palestinian Refugees
The Events of 1948 and the Palestinian Refugees Summary by Ron Stockton We can learn much about history from first-hand reports. What follows are two types of reports: contemporary documents and the perspectives of those who were present, and the results of recent scholarship. There is an exceptional amount of rhetoric around these events. A polemic is an argument designed to prove that you are right and some rival group is wrong. There is a Jewish-Arab polemic and a Jewish-Jewish polemic [between the Ben-Gurion/Haganah/Labour left and the Begin/Herut/Likud right]. These polemics are only marginally included. Tessler discusses them more fully. The New Historians : When Menachem Begin became Prime Minister in 1977, he was so stung by allegations that he was a terrorist that he began to open the state archives to researchers. More archives were opened under the 50-year rule in 1997 and 1998. These produced a wave of new research based on documents, journals, reports, minutes. Israelis saw themselves as peaceful and accommodating and the Arab side as the problem. Four books shook the way Israelis saw this history. These were Simha Flapan’s The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities; Benny Morris’ The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949; Ilan Pappe’s Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-1951; Avi Shlain’s Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, The Zionist Movement, and the Partition of Palestine; and Tom Segev, 1949:The First Israelis. Background: Fighting in Palestine went through three distinct stages with different characteristics and different military forces. -
The Christiani's Rule Over Israel During the Jewish War: Tacitus' Fragment 2 and Histories 5.13, Suetonius Vespasian 4.5, and the Coins of the Jewish War
Eric LAUPOT THE CHRISTIANI'S RULE OVER ISRAEL DURING THE JEWISH WAR: TACITUS' FRAGMENT 2 AND HISTORIES 5.13, SUETONIUS VESPASIAN 4.5, AND THE COINS OF THE JEWISH WAR RÉSUMÉ Il a été démontré autre part que les sectateurs de celui qui, chez Tacite, (Annales 15, 44) est désigné comme Christus (i. e. les Christiani ou Nazoréens) ont joué un rôle essentiel dans la Guerre Juive contre Rome de 66-73 (cf. le second fragment des Histoires de Tacite [Tacite, fragment 2]), et que c'est en grande partie pour écraser ces Christiani et leur mouvement que les armées romaines ont détruit le Second Temple. L'article étudie, à partir de données diverses, certaines implications de cette découverte: 1) les Nazoréens étaient très vraisemblablement en charge de l'ensem- ble des Juifs, et pas uniquement du Temple, durant la Guerre Juive; 2) les Christiani de Tacite étaient sans doute la secte historique dont procède, dans le Nouveau Testa- ment, celle des Xristianoí; 3) L'homme qui est désigné sous le nom de Chrestus chez Suétone (Claudius, 25, 4) était un roi nazoréen bien connu; 4) Tacite avait rai- son d'associer les Christiani au Grand Incendie de Rome qui eut lieu en 64, ce qu'il est le seul à faire parmi les historiens antiques; 5) Un autre nom du mouvement nazoréen était «la Voie»; 6) Antérieurement au Grand Incendie, les Gentils de Rome avaient fait l'objet, de la part des Nazoréens, d'une activité prosélyte impor- tante et couronnée de succès; 7) Les Nazoréens ne sont pas à l'origine du Grand In- cendie (la logique interne confirme ici les apparences); 8) L'Église paulinienne pri- mitive était loyale à l'égard de Rome et rejetait les Christiani opposés à Rome: si le gouvernement central n'a pas persécuté l'Église avant 270, c'est sans doute parce que le Christianisme était considéré comme un contrepoids à l'activité prosélyte des Nazoréens (et d'autres, potentiellement) parmi les esclaves et les classes inférieures. -
Mason's History of the Jewish War and the Siege of Masada
Recovering Josephus: Mason’s History of the Jewish War and the Siege of Masada Gwyn Davies and Jodi Magness In a recent book, S. Mason, a highly-regarded Josephus specialist, presents an overview of the First Jewish Revolt against Rome.1 Mason argues that Josephus’ testimony is unreliable and incomplete, and therefore cannot form a basis for reconstructing events which unfolded in Judea and Rome two thousand years ago.2 Instead, according to Mason, any one of a number of scenarios not presented by Josephus could equally likely have occurred.3 One episode that Mason discusses at length is Josephus’ account of the siege and fall of Masada.4 In this paper, we examine the archaeological remains at Masada, and conclude — contra Mason — that they support Josephus’ description of the Roman assault over other possible scenarios. Mason’s book is not a critique of Josephus’ testimony as such, but rather the way in which that testimony has been interpreted and understood by modern scholars, as he seeks ‘to distinguish between the interpretation of whatever has survived… and our imagining of the lost past.’5 To achieve this, Mason sets out ‘to investigate crucial moments in the war and the evidence for them by looking first for the simplest, or most analogically complete, explanations.’6 In other words, according to Mason, we cannot know what really happened in the past, due to the nature of our sources, because (as he says regarding the First Revolt): ‘We have no one to rely on for this war.’7 Instead, Mason believes we should be open to considering various possibilities, even if they conflict with surviving literary accounts.8 In this paper, we test Mason’s post-modern literary approach to Josephus through one case study: the siege of Masada, focusing in particular on the assault ramp. -
24F the Soncino Babylonian Talmud
YEVOMOS – 107a-122b 24f The Soncino Babylonian Talmud YYEEVVOOMMOOSS BOOK VI Folios 107a-122b CHAPTERS XIII-XVI TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH NOTES BY R E V . D R . I srael W. SLOTKI, M.A., Litt.D. UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF R A B B I D R I. EPSTEIN B.A., Ph.D., D. Lit. Reformatted by Reuven Brauner, Raanana 5772 www.613etc.com 1 YEVOMOS – 107a-122b bridal chamber. 16 What reason, however, could be advanced 13 where the father 17 Yebamoth 107a entrusted her to the representatives of the husband? 18 — The Rabbis made no CHAPTER XIII distinction. 19 And Beth Hillel? 20 — It is well known that the marriage of a minor is only MISHNAH . BETH SHAMMAI RULED: Rabbinically valid. 21 ONLY THOSE 1 WHO ARE BETROTHED 2 Both Rabbah and R. Joseph declared: The MAY EXERCISE THE RIGHT OF reason of Beth Shammai 22 is that no man REFUSAL; 3 BUT BETH HILLEL RULED: wishes to treat his cohabitation as mere BOTH THOSE WHO ARE BETROTHED fornication. 23 What, however, can be the AND THOSE WHO ARE MARRIED. BETH reason 22 where she only entered the bridal SHAMMAI RULED: [A DECLARATION chamber and no cohabitation took place? 24 OF REFUSAL 3 MAY BE MADE] AGAINST No man would like his bridal chamber to be A HUSBAND BUT NOT AGAINST A [an introduction to] a forbidden act. 25 What LEVIR; 4 BUT BETH HILLEL RULED: reason, 22 then, could be advanced where the EITHER AGAINST A HUSBAND OR father 26 had entrusted her to the AGAINST A LEVIR.