Wealth and Wisdom Ecclesiastes 5:10-20 Quentin Matsys Was Born

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wealth and Wisdom Ecclesiastes 5:10-20 Quentin Matsys Was Born Wealth and Wisdom Ecclesiastes 5:10-20 Quentin Matsys was born in the year 1466 in Leuven, Belgium. Matsys was a Dutch Renaissance artist. In the year 1514, he painted this picture titled, The Moneylender and His Wife. The painting is on permanent display at the Louvre in Paris. Matsys’ painting confronts us with the choice everyone has to make between God and money. In the painting, the moneylender is seated at a table with a scale and a pile of coins in front of him. He’s carefully assessing the value of a coin he’s holding in his hand. The moneylender’s wife is seated next to him. She’s leafing through a devotional book that has an illustration of the Virgin Mary holding Jesus. She’s trying to focus on spiritual things, but she’s distracted by the money her husband is counting. What motivated Quentin Matsys to paint this picture? In the 16th century, his adopted city of Antwerp, Belgium was the European center for banking, business and trade. Antwerp was a very affluent city, but it was in a state of spiritual decline. Massys was giving artistic expression to the fact that the love of money can distract us from our relationship with God. Every believer grapples with this challenge. As followers of Christ, we know that God calls for our highest allegiance and complete trust - and yet, money can compete for the rightful place God wants to have in our heart. All of us come from different backgrounds and have learned different things about money. Some of us were raised in families that struggled to get by. Some of us were raised in a family that wasn’t rich per se, but there was always enough money for food, clothing, shelter and the things that were needed. Some of us were raised in a family that was well off. Whatever our background, money plays a significant role in our sense of security. Because of this, we need instruction on how to use it wisely. Apart from Jesus, who is more qualified to teach on this subject than Solomon? God blessed Solomon with riches. The Lord also gave him the wisdom to understand that wealth can either be a tool – or it can be an idol. As we return to Ecclesiastes chapter 5, we find that Solomon continues to make observations about things that impact our lives. Thus far in 2 this book, he’s talked about the elusive nature of happiness. Solomon searched high and low to find happiness apart from God, but he ended up frustrated and disillusioned. Solomon has talked about the challenge of finding enjoyment in our vocation. He’s talked about the value of friendship. In our text of the morning, Solomon talks about the folly of putting our hope in money – instead of finding our security in God. We’re going to look at some practical lessons he learned from personal experience. I invite you to write these down in your outline. First, Solomon learned that: 1. Wealth doesn’t ultimately satisfy. Solomon says three things about this in verses 10-12. He says in verse 10 the more you have, the more you want. Solomon writes: Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income. In 1948, Warner Brothers Pictures released the movie Key Largo starring Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall and Edward G. Robinson. Edward G. Robinson played the role of a gangster named Johnny Rocco. Johnny Rocco’s life was filled with violence and greed. In the movie, Rocco and his thugs take a group of people hostage. One of the hostages, Frank McCloud (played by Humphrey Bogart) asked him, “Why do you lead the life of a gangster? What is it that you really want?” Johnny Rocco wasn’t quite sure how to respond. So Frank McCloud suggested an answer. He said, “I know what you want. You want more.” Johnny Rocco’s face brightens – and he said in an animated voice, “Yeah, that’s right. I want more!” That’s the mindset of our culture. We want more - and through the years we’ve acquired more. When the film Key Largo was made in 1948 - the average home in America had about 1,000 square feet. Today, the average new home in America has about 2,200 square feet. Home sizes have doubled since 1948 - and yet, we don’t have room for all of the things we own. In recent decades, a whole new industry has cropped up in America called the self-storage business. As of 2013, there are more than 48,500 self-storage facilities in the United States. These units offer more than 2.3 billion square feet for people to store their belongings. 40 years ago, the self-storage industry didn’t exist. But today, Americans spend more than 24 billion dollars a year on storage space rentals. 3 John D. Rockefeller was the founder of the Standard Oil Company. In his day, Rockefeller was one of the richest men in the world. When he was 53 years of age, he was earning one million dollars a week. Rockefeller was once asked how much money was enough. He said, “How much money is enough? Just a little bit more.” Solomon observes that the accumulation of riches can lead to a desire for more riches. We find another lesson in verse 11: The more you have, the more others want it. Solomon wrote: As goods increase, so do those who consume them. Let your eyes train on the phrase “…so do those who consume them.” Solomon is saying that those who are wealthy sometimes have to fend off people who try to take advantage of them. In his paraphrased version of the Bible called The Message, Eugene Peterson puts verse 11 this way: “The more loot you get, the more looters show up.” The retired heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson earned a staggering 300 million dollars in his prizefighting career. But in 2004 – the year before he retired - he was 23 million dollars in debt. Tyson lost his money to unscrupulous financial consultants, lawyers, poor business decisions – and he gave away a significant amount of money to people who asked for help. Late in his career – and certainly well past his prime – Tyson took fights just for the payday. He took savage beatings from opponents. We see another lesson in verse 12: The more we have, the more we worry. Look at verse 12: The sleep of a laborer is sweet, whether they eat little or much, but as for the rich, their abundance permits them no sleep. Why can’t the rich sleep well at night? Solomon doesn’t say, exactly. Perhaps their brain won’t go into rest mode because they’re thinking about how to make more money – or they’re worried about losing their money? In February 2004, a 62-year old man who lived in western France was rushed to a hospital because he was gravely ill. It was believed he had a cancerous tumor in his abdomen. A preliminary x-ray showed a mass about the size of a bowling ball. Doctors performed exploratory 4 surgery and were shocked by what they found. The man had swallowed 350 French Franc coins and several gold necklaces. He was worried about losing his valuables. Sadly, the man died from sepsis a few days after surgery. There’s a postscript to the story of John D. Rockefeller. When he was earning one million dollars a week, Rockefeller was so consumed by stress and worry, he was unable to eat. He survived on milk and crackers. Rockefeller’s health was in rapid decline – and he thought he wasn’t going to live much longer. Rockefeller began to lean upon the Lord. He was a member of the Riverside Church in New York City – but he was distracted by business interests. Rockefeller renewed his faith in Christ found freedom from worry. How? By becoming extraordinarily generous. He regained his health and lived another forty-four years – during that time, he gave away 540 million dollars. John D. Rockefeller died in 1937 at the age of 97. It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking, “If I just had more money – it would solve all of my problems.” But Solomon learned that money can create more problems than it solves. It’s not uncommon for us to covet the life of a rich person – but it’s altogether possible that a rich person covets your life and mine! Solomon said, “If you love money, you’ll never be satisfied—because you’ll always think you need more.” Here’s the second lesson. Solomon observed that: 2. Wealth is easily lost. The comedian Rodney Dangerfield once said, “Money talks. Mine says, ‘Goodbye’.” Look at verses 13-14 with me: I have seen a grievous evil under the sun: wealth hoarded to the harm of its owners, or wealth lost through some misfortune, so that when they have children there is nothing left for them to inherit. One of the illusions of wealth is that it provides security. But Solomon says in this passage that we can be harmed by hoarding wealth. For one thing, it can have a harmful impact on our spiritual life. Paul said this in his first letter to Timothy: Those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root 5 of all kinds of evil.
Recommended publications
  • THE ICONOGRAPHY of MEXICAN FOLK RETABLOS by Gloria Kay
    The iconography of Mexican folk retablos Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Giffords, Gloria Fraser, 1938- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 20:27:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552047 THE ICONOGRAPHY OF MEXICAN FOLK RETABLOS by Gloria Kay Fraser Giffords A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN HISTORY OF ART In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Scales As a Symbol of Metaphysical Judgement – from Misterium Tremendum to Misterium Fascinosum an Analysis of Selected Works of Netherlandish Masters of Painting
    Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2/2015 (1): 259-274 DOI: 10.4467/2450050XSR.15.022.4520 VARIA Karol Dobrzeniecki* [email protected] Faculty of Law and Administration of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń ul. Władysława Bojarskiego 3 87-100 Toruń, Poland Scales as a Symbol of Metaphysical Judgement – from Misterium Tremendum to Misterium Fascinosum An Analysis of Selected Works of Netherlandish Masters of Painting Abstract: The aim of this article is to analyze the motif of scales in Netherlandish art from the 15th to the 17th century. The motif of scales was present in art from earliest times, but its role and func- tion differed in various historical epochs – antique, the middle ages, and the modern age. The core part of the article is devoted to the symbolic relationship between scales and different aspects of justice. The first painting taken into consideration is Rogier van der Weyden’s Last Judgment (approx. 1445 to 1450), and the last one – Jan Vermeer’s Woman Holding a Balance (approx. 1662-1663). The article attempts to answer some crucial questions. What were the meanings attributed to scales during the two centuries exam- ined? How did these meanings evolve, and was the interpretation of the symbol influenced by the ethos characteristic for particular peri- ods and geographical spaces, as well as transient fashions, religious * Karol Dobrzeniecki, Doctor of Law and art historian, currently serves as an Assistant Professor at the Department of Theory of Law and State, Faculty of Law and Administration of the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Quentin Matsys's a Grotesque Old Woman
    Portrait of Sixteenth-Century Disability? Quentin Matsys’s A Grotesque Old Woman Sara Newman, PhD Kent State University, USA Abstract: Scholars rarely examine art works from a disability studies perspective; their analyses often misinterpret those works, reinforcing contemporary assumptions about disability and its past representations. Accordingly, this paper examines a portrait by sixteenth-century Antwerp artist Quentin Matsys (1466-1529) from a historically situated disability studies perspective. A Grotesque Old Woman (c.1513) has been understood in terms of abnormality. Existing scholarship has suggested that she represents physical, gender, and sexual deviance in the spirit of Erasmian allegories, or an individual with Paget’s disease. Although these interpretations may inform contemporary scholarship, they shed little light on sixteenth-century disability and its artistic representations. This paper demonstrates how the portrait reflects a cultural transition from an earlier collective, religious model of disability to a more “municipal” one which considers disability vis-à-vis individuals engaged in daily commercial or personal activities. This analysis provides insight into how disability was understood in Matsys’s time, contributes to our understanding of the Dutch allegorical and portraiture traditions, and demonstrates what a historically situated disability model offers future research on artistic representations of disability. Key Words: art history, Netherlandish portraiture; the grotesque “I’ve always been intrigued by this painting. It’s fascinating because it is so meticulously and lovingly painted. You think, why would someone go to so much trouble in order to paint such a grotesque image? I always suspected there was something more to it than just a study in grotesquery” (Brown, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Our Lady of Antwerp
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons Faculty Publications LSU Libraries 2018 Sacred vs. Profane in The Great War: A Neutral’s Indictment Marty Miller Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/libraries_pubs Part of the Art and Design Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Marty, "Sacred vs. Profane in The Great War: A Neutral’s Indictment" (2018). Faculty Publications. 79. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/libraries_pubs/79 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the LSU Libraries at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sacred vs. Profane in The Great War: A Neutral’s Indictment Louis Raemaekers’s Use of Religious Imagery in Adoration of the Magi and Our Lady of Antwerp by Marty Miller Art and Design Librarian Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana t the onset of the First World War in August 1914, Germany invaded France and Belgium, resulting in almost immediate British intervention and provoking a firestorm of protest throughout Western Europe. Belgium’s Asmall military was overmatched and reduced to fighting skirmishes as the Kaiser’s war machine headed toward France. Belgian civilians, as they had during the Franco- Prussian War, resisted by taking up arms. Snipers and ambushes slowed the Germans’ advance. In retaliation, German troops massacred Belgian men, women, and children. Cities, villages, and farms were burned and plundered.1 Belgian neutrality meant nothing to the German master plan to invade and defeat France before the Russian army could effectively mobilize in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at the Cure of Folly
    Medical History, 1978, 22: 267-281. A NEW LOOK AT THE CURE OF FOLLY by WILLIAM SCHUPBACH* THE MEDICAL and surgical scenes depicted by Netherlandish artists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries have attracted the admiring attention of historians of medicine to such a degree that almost no book on "art and medicine" omits such paintings as Jan Steen's A love-sick (or pregnant) girl visited by a physician (several versions) or Gerrit Dou's Quacksalver (Rotterdam, Boymans-van Beuningen museum), although their documentary value is problematical.' Almost as popular are the paint- ings and graphics which illustrate the scene known in Dutch as Het snijden van den kei, in French as La pierre de tte or La pierre defolie, in English as The cure offolly, and in German as Der Steinschneider. In these scenes, a medical practitioner- physician, surgeon, barber-surgeon or quack, or a combination of those four-makes an incision in the patient's scalp and appears to extract from it a foreign body, usually a stone, the pierre de tete, which, according to contemporary inscriptions, had caused the patient to be afflicted with some kind of mental disorder ("folly"). One of the first modem writers to discuss these scenes, writing about the version in the Prado (Madrid) which is attributed to Hieronymus Bosch, interpreted it as a fantastic suggestion to the surgeons, comparable to Swift's suggestion of reciprocal hind-brain transplants for contentious politicians.2 This interpretation was soon overcast by another, which was first put forward by Henry Meige of the Salpetri6re in a fascinating and persuasive series of articles.3 The Persian physician Rhazes *William Schupbach, M.A., Weilcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BP.
    [Show full text]
  • Memling's Portraits of Christ. a Cognitive Approach
    LASSE HODNE Memling’s Portraits of Christ. A Cognitive Approach Abstract Previous research conducted by the author revealed a clear preference for profile and half profile view in paintings of secular persons. Frontal view (full face or en face) was usually restricted to representations of Christ. In this paper, the results will be applied to the study of the paintings of one particular artist: the German born fiftheenth century painter Hans Memling. Adopting methods from traditional art history as well as cognitive psychology, the aim is to show how Memling’s systematic distinction between sacred and profane, using the frontal view only for representations of Christ, can be explained by reference to psychological studies on the effects and values usually associated with the frontal view of a face. Introduction The German-born Flemish painter Hans Memling (c. 1435-1494), active in the Netherlands and Brussels in the second half of the 15th century, was one of his period’s most productive artists. He produced works in various genres, concentrating mostly on religious subjects and portraits. Of the total 36 portraits that he painted, four represent Christ. Of these, three show him full face, while in the fourth he has averted face. In the latter, he also has blood and Crown of Thorns, which is lacking in the rest. In this article, I will seek to show that these two types represent two different aspects of Christ and that Memling, probably unconscious- ly, relied on an unwritten rule that ordinary people should not be represented frontally in painting. By means of a statistical analysis of material from catalogs of Italian, German and Flemish art from the 14th and 16th century, I will try to show, first, that frontality was far more common in representations of Christ than secular persons and, second, that two quite distinct forms of Christ portraits exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal Volume 10, Issues 3 & 4 Copyright 2014 Table of Contents Editorial: Progress Megan A. Conway, PhD, RDS Managing Editor p. 3 Forum: Art History and Disability Guest Editors: p. 4 Ann Millett-Gallant, University of North Carolina, USA Elizabeth Howie, Coastal Carolina University, USA Forum Editors Introduction p. 4 Forum Articles Composing Dwarfism: Reframing Short Stature in Contemporary Photography Amanda Cachia, University of California, San Diego, USA p. 6 A 16th Century Portrait of Disability? Quentin Matsys' A Grotesque Old Woman p. 20 Sara Newman, Kent State University, USA Shifting Perception: Photographing Disabled People During the Civil Rights Era Timothy Hiles, University of Tennessee, USA p. 30 Becoming Aware of One’s Own Biased Attitude: The Observer’s Encounter with Disability in Chris Ware’s Acme Novelty Library no. 18 p. 40 Nina Heindl, Ruhr-University, Germany Research Articles Facing Dyslexia: The Education of Chuck Close p. 52 Ken Gobbo, Landmark College, USA Summer of 2012: Paralympic Legacy and the Welfare Benefit Scandal p. 62 Liz Crow, Bristol University, United Kingdom RDSv10 i3&4 1 A Capabilities View of Accessibility in Policy and Practice in Jordan and Peru Joyojeet Pal, PhD, University of Michigan, USA p. 77 Book and Media Reviews Both Sides of the Table: Autoethnographies of Educators Learning and Teaching With/In [Dis]Ability. Disability Studies in Education, Vol 12. Eds. Susan L. Gabel and Scot Danforth p. 94 Reviewed by Steven E. Brown, PhD, University of Hawaii, USA Quality of Life and Intellectual Disability; Knowledge Application to Other Social and Educational Challenges, Edited by Roy I.
    [Show full text]
  • Christ Blessing with the Virgin in Adoration’
    MA.FEB.STAINER.pg.proof.corrs:Layout 1 02/02/2010 14:43 Page 76 A rediscovered prototype by Quinten Metsys: ‘Christ blessing with the Virgin in adoration’ by KIFFY STAINER-HUTCHINS, SIMON WATNEY and HUGO PLATT 1. Christ blessing , here attributed to Quinten Metsys. c.1491–1505. Panel, 37.6 by 30.4 2. The Virgin in adoration , by Quinten Metsys. c.1491–1505. Panel, 34.7 by cm. (Holy Trinity Church, Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire). 26.5 cm. (Trustees of the Rt. Hon. Olive, Countess Fitzwilliam’s Chattels Settlement; Lady Juliet Tadgell). THE WORKSHOP OF Quinten Metsys (1465/66–1530) produced such that there are also many variants by artists in his circle, as a number of variant versions of paintings of Christ blessing and well as many later copies. In January 2006 the present writers the Virgin in adoration, some of them diptychs, with varying discovered a small painting depicting Christ blessing, hanging in degrees of participation by Metsys himself. His influence was Holy Trinity Church, Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire. Although We wish to thank the following people for their help: the Revd Canon William morse; sale, Brussels, Palais des Beaux-Arts, 19th to 21st February 1957, lot 411; Matthews and his parish (Holy Trinity Church, Bradford-on-Avon), Lady Juliet present whereabouts unknown). A version of the combined Bradford-on- Tadgell, Lorne Campbell, Rachel Billinge and Cathy Metzger, as well as Nancy Avon/Tadgell image can be seen in the Praying Mary and the blessing Christ (where - Allred, Konrad Bernheimer, Xanthe Brooke, David Bull, Nichola Costaras, Yolande abouts unknown; Kaufmann sale, Berlin, 4th December 1917, lot 84).
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob Soll, USC INAA 25Th Anniversary, San Francisco, 2017
    Jacob Soll, USC INAA 25th Anniversary, San Francisco, 2017 Basic Books/Penguin • What makes states succeed or fail? • Are there elemental ingredients? • What makes states succeed or fail? • Are there elemental ingredients? What makes states succeed or fail? Are there elemental ingredient • Accounting = Accountability • Also auditing Cosimo de’ Medici, 1389-1464 Medici Bank Secret Ledger early 1470s Francesco Sassetti, Medici Bank Chief Accountant Philip II of Spain, Ruled 1554-1598 Bartolomé Salvador de Solórzano, LIBRO DE CAXA y Manual de cuentas de Mercaderes, y otras personas,con la declaracion dellos (1590) Louis XIV, 1638-1715 Jean-Baptiste Colbert, In power 1661-1683 Louis XIV’s Golden Accountbooks 1661-83 Europe, 1600 Hans Memling, The Last Judgment Bruges, 1467- 1471 Pomorskie Museum Gdansk, Poland Portrait of the Merchant, 1530 Jan Gossaert, Washington, DC National Gallery Quentin Metsys, The Moneylender and His Wife Quentin Metsys,, Antwerp, 1514 Marinus van Remerswaele The Moneychanger and His Wife Antwerp, 1539 Quentin Matsys, The Moneychangers Antwerp, 1549 Marinus van Remerswaele Two Tax Gatherers Antwerp, Circa 1540 Early 16th Century Painting Depicting a Merchant, his Books and Death Bruges, Jan Provost The Dutch Lion 1540-1700 • Leaders of the Dutch Republic strive to create an accountable society Allegory to Commerce, 1585 Jost Amman Simon Stevin, 1548-1620 Dutch mathematician, humanist and pioneer of accounting education Simon Stevin, Accounting for Princes Amsterdam, 1604 Maurice of Nassau, Prince of Orange 1567-1625 Prince Maurice’s Double Entry Ledgers, 1604 The Hague, Netherlands, National Archives Dutch East India Company (VOC) Founded 1602 Amsterdam Stock Exchange Founded 1602 Cornelis van de Voort, Regents of the Old People’s Home Amsterdam, 1618 Nicolaes Eliasz Pickenoy Regents of the Women’s House of Correction Amsterdam, 1628 Johannes Verspronck, Lady Governors of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Traduções/Translations
    Traduções/Translations Un certo vescovo d’Ungheria e Alcuni sbagli nel testo sono dovuti e dell’amicizia invece di sangue o di i suoi amici alle fonti del Vasari. La vita del Man- funzione pubblica. tegna è presentata con discordanze Il trattato sull’amicizia sta tra gli Nancy Ridel Kaplan considerevole in ambedue edizione ultimi testi di Cicerone, scritto nel 43 Post-dottorato, IFCH, Unicamp delle vite. Nel 1550, nella Torrentina, a.C., pochi mesi prima della sua morte. Vasari incorre in errore quando parla Ha la forma di heracleideion, un dialogo del soggiorno padovano del Mantegna. tra personaggi del passato, genere ere- Nella seconda edizione delle Vite, Già, nella Giuntina, nel 1568, le prime Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574) descrive gli ditato dei greci e abbastanza comune opere del pittore sono da lui descritte all’epoca. Tra gli obiettivi di Cicerone, affreschi di Andrea Mantegna (1430/1- in tutti i suoi dettagli e anche i rapporti c’era la trasmissione del pensiero greco 1506) nella cappela Ovetari [Fig.1] 1: così difficili fra Mantegna e Squarcione ai romani. L’amicizia era uno degli argo- [Mantegna] vi ritrasse anco (...)un certo ve- (1397-1468). Tra le due redazioni delle menti più frequenti. Il trattato ha avuto scovo d’Ungheria, uomo sciocco affatto, il quale Vite Vasari è stato nell’Italia Settentrio- influenza considerevole nei secoli. Sono andava tutto giorno per Roma vagabondo e poi nale e rimase qualche giorni a Padova. state fatte molte copie manoscritte e la notte si riduceva a dormire come le bestie In questa occasione, Vasari ha po- sucessive edizioni.
    [Show full text]
  • Massys and Money: the Tax Collectors Rediscovered
    Volume 7, Issue 2 (Summer 2015) Massys and Money: The Tax Collectors Rediscovered Larry Silver [email protected] Recommended Citation: Larry Silver, “Massys and Money: The Tax Collectors Rediscovered,” JHNA 7:2 (Summer 2015), DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2015.7.2.2 Available at https://jhna.org/articles/massys-money-tax-collectors-rediscovered/ Published by Historians of Netherlandish Art: https://hnanews.org/ Republication Guidelines: https://jhna.org/republication-guidelines/ Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. This PDF provides paragraph numbers as well as page numbers for citation purposes. ISSN: 1949-9833 JHNA 7:2 (Summer 2015) 1 MASSYS AND MONEY: THE TAX COLLECTORS REDISCOVERED Larry Silver One of the formative images of later Flemish genre paintings, Quinten Massys’s Tax Collectors has been rediscovered (now Liechtenstein Collection, Vaduz). Its ledger clearly reveals the proper designation of the figures, despite interpre- tations of their activity as banking; one of them, wearing glasses, appears to be inspecting accounts. Telling markers of Massys’s own authorship (ca. 1525–30) reveal that his large workshop based at least some of the better copies on this painting. The subject clearly relates to local ambivalence in Antwerp about taxes and the money economy, especially during a period of financial recession. The article concludes with a discussion about later variants derived from Massys’s prototype, especially those by Marinus van Reymerswaele (Paris, London, plus lesser variants), but the theme is still present in Rembrandt’s 1628 Moneychanger (Gemäldegalerie, Berlin) and addressed anew in his etching of Jan Wtenbogaert (1639).
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian History and the Neutrality Question
    ; BELGIAN HISTORY AND THE NEUTRALITY QUESTION. BY THE EDITOR. BELGIUM, in industry and art, is for its size one of the greatest countries in the world, and it is the Flemish portion of the population that has been and still is leading in these noble pursuits. Historians of the country point with pride to the old Flemish school patronized by the wealthy burghers, and from the long list of great artists we will mention the following names : the brothers Hubert and Jan van Eyck, Hans Memling, and Quentin Matsys, all of whom lived before the Reformation, the last one being a con- temporary of Luther ; and Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck and David Teniers, the stars of Flemish art after the Reformation but the greatest among them is Peter Paul Rubens. After Charlemagne the country was divided into a number of feudal principalities among which Flanders was the most prominent, so as to enable the counts of Flanders to acquire the territories of their weaker neighbors. Before the time of the Reformation Hol- land and Belgium developed together, as they formed practically one country, known as the Netherlands. The line of the counts of Flanders died out in 1384, the last one of them leaving a daughter who was married to Charles the Bold of Burgundy. Times were favorable ; commerce and trade developed ; and the dukes patronized artists ; all of which resulted in the first golden age of Flemish art. But in time new conditions arose ; Mary of Burgundy, the daugh- ter of Charles the Bold, married Maximilian of Hapsburg, later on Emperor, who in 1477 inherited the Netherlands ; and when Maxi- milian's grandson, Emperor Charles V, retired into a monastery in 1556, he divided his extended possessions into two parts.
    [Show full text]