DOCSLIB.ORG

Profile of Internal Displacement : Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Profile of Internal Displacement : Georgia PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : GEORGIA Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 18 March, 2004) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 7 GEORGIA: NO IMPROVEMENT IN RETURN CONDITIONS DESPITE DECADE-LONG CEASEFIRE 7 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 10 BACKGROUND 10 BASIC FACTS ON GEORGIA (1995) 10 ETHNIC DIVISIONS IN ABKHAZIA DURING THE SOVIET ERA (1920-1989) 10 THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: A MAJOR ACTOR IN THE ABKHAZ CONFLICT (2001) 12 ARMENIA EXPRESSES CONCERN OVER THREAT AGAINST ARMENIAN MINORITY IN ABKHAZIA (2001) 13 THE SEVERE ECONOMIC BREAKDOWN SERIOUSLY AFFECTS THE STATE'S CAPACITY TO CARE FOR THE MOST VULNERABLE (2002) 13 ABKHAZIA 15 SIX YEARS OF ON-AND-OFF WAR (1992-1998) 15 DISPLACEMENT AND "ETHNIC CLEANSING" (1992-1999) 16 TENSIONS ALONG THE CEASEFIRE LINE BETWEEN ABKHAZ AND GEORGIAN SIDE (2001-2003) 19 THE PEACE EFFORTS: THE CHALLENGE OF IDP RETURN (1994-2002) 20 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2003: INTERNATIONAL ATTEMPTS TO SUPPORT THE ABKHAZ-GEORGIAN DIALOGUE 22 NEW GEORGIAN LEADERSHIP MAINTAINS FOCUS ON THE ABKHAZ ISSUE (2004) 24 SOUTH OSSETIA 26 SOUTH OSSETIA: PEACE EFFORTS UNDER THE OSCE MEDIATION (1992-2002) 26 SMALL STEPS DONE THROUGH THE EU SUPPORTS TO REHABILITATION PROGRAMMES IN SOUTH OSSETIA (2002-2003) 28 OTHER GEORGIAN REGIONS 29 NEED FOR DISPLACEMENT PREVENTION IN OTHER GEORGIAN REGIONS (2000) 29 POPULATION PROFILE AND FIGURES 31 GLOBAL FIGURES 31 TOTAL INTERNALLY DISPLACED POPULATION: 260,000 PERSONS AS OF SEPTEMBER 2003 31 DISAGGREGATED DATA 33 ABOUT 40 PERCENT OF THE IDPS LIVE IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES BUT UPDATED FIGURES ARE NOT AVAILABLE (2003) 33 SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS LACK OF CONSISTENT FIGURES ON IDPS (2002) 34 DEMOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE OF THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED POPULATION DIFFERS NOTICEABLY FROM THE REST OF THE POPULATION (2000-2002) 35 THE NUMBER AND ETHNIC ORIGIN OF THOSE WHO HAVE FLED ABKHAZIA, HAVE REMAINED OR HAVE RETURNED IS A HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL POLITICAL ISSUE BETWEEN ABKHAZIA AND GEORGIA (2000) 36 DISTRIBUTION OF THE DISPLACED BY TYPE OF ACCOMMODATION (NOVEMBER 1999) 37 DISPLACEMENT OF GEORGIANS (1992-1997) 38 DISPLACEMENT OF RUSSIANS, ARMENIANS AND GREEKS (1992-1993) 38 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT 40 GENERAL PATTERN 40 DISPLACEMENT PATTERNS LEAD TO A CONCENTRATION OF IDPS IN A NUMBER OF GEORGIAN CITIES (1997) 40 DISPLACEMENT OF ABKHAZ POPULATION (1992-1999) 40 PHYSICAL SECURITY & FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 42 GENERAL 42 CRIMINALITY REMAINS HIGH IN SOUTH OSSETIA (2003) 42 INSECURITY IN ABKHAZIA: A CONCERN FOR THE SAFETY OF RETURNEES (2003) 43 MINES IN THE GALI DISTRICT: AN OBSTACLE TO RETURN (2002) 46 RETURNEES TO SOUTH OSSETIA REMAIN EXPOSED TO HARASSMENT AND VIOLENCE (2000-2001) 46 SUBSISTENCE NEEDS (HEALTH NUTRITION AND SHELTER) 48 HEALTH 48 HEALTH CONDITION OF IDPS IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES BELOW AVERAGE (2002) 48 FIELD SURVEYS REVEAL PSYCHOSOCIAL TRAUMA OF DISPLACED PERSONS (2002-2003) 48 ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE SERVICES IS GOOD DESPITE LOW STATE FUNDING (2000-2003) 49 DETERIORATING HEALTH SITUATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA: (2002) 51 DIFFICULT ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE FOR THE DISPLACED AGGRAVATES EFFECTS OF POOR LIVING CONDITIONS (2000) 51 FIELD SURVEY BY SAVE THE CHILDREN IN WESTERN GEORGIA HIGHLIGHTS HEALTH NEEDS OF THE DISPLACED (2000) 53 FIELD SURVEYS REVEAL PSYCHO-SOCIAL TRAUMA OF DISPLACED WOMEN AND MEN (1995-2000) 54 SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS 55 DONOR AGENCIES CONSIDER PRIVATISATION OF COLLECTIVE SHELTERS (2003-2004) 55 IDPS IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES: SUBSTANDARD LIVING CONDITIONS (2001-2002) 56 INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON LEGAL REGIME DETERS IDPS FROM PURCHASING PROPERTY (2000-2002) 57 IDPS LEAVE HOST FAMILIES AND MOVE TO COLLECTIVE CENTRES (1994-2003) 59 INSUFFICIENT FIREWOOD TO FACE WINTER HEATING NEEDS IN SOUTH OSSETIA (2002) 60 IDPS HAVE SAME ACCESS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AS THE REST OF THE POPULATION (2002-2003) 60 IDP COLLECTIVE CENTRES HIT BY EARTHQUAKE IN TBILISI (2002-2003) 61 PRECARIOUS HOUSING CONDITIONS OF THE DISPLACED (2000) 62 2 SHELTER NEEDS IN SOUTH OSSETIA: A PREREQUISITE FOR RETURN (2000-2001) 64 COLLECTIVE SHELTERS IN WESTERN GEORGIA NEED MAJOR REPAIRS (2000) 64 THE SITUATION OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND ELDERLY IDPS (1999) 65 FOOD 66 INDICATORS SHOW LOWER NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF IDPS (1999-2002) 66 ACCESS TO EDUCATION 67 GENERAL 67 ISSUE OF LANGUAGE OF EDUCATION IN ABKHAZIA: A DECISIVE FACTOR ON RETURN (2000-2004) 67 DISPLACED CHILDREN FACE DIFFICULT CONDITIONS AT SCHOOLS (2000-2003) 68 ISSUES OF SELF-RELIANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 71 SELF-RELIANCE 71 MANY BARRIERS TO THE AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE DISPLACED POPULATION (2000-2003) 71 POOR ECONOMIC SITUATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA HAMPERS LARGE-SCALE RETURN OF THE DISPLACED (2000-2002) 73 ACCESS TO INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES: HIGHER UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG IDPS (2000- 2002) 74 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES OF THE DISPLACED ARE CONSTRAINED BY THE DIFFICULT ECONOMIC SITUATION (2000) 76 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 77 RECENT REFORM OF ELECTION CODE RESTORES IDPS' VOTING RIGHTS (2002-2003) 77 IDPS IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES ARE SOCIALLY ISOLATED (2000-2002) 78 IDPS STAGE DEMONSTRATIONS AGAINST NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS (2001-2002) 79 PARALLEL STRUCTURES OF GOVERNANCE FUNCTION AS AN ASSISTANCE NETWORK FOR THE DISPLACED FROM ABKHAZIA (2001) 80 DISPLACED PERSONS UNDER PRESSURE NOT TO DEMAND THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE (2000) 80 MARGINAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF DISPLACED WOMEN (2000) 81 DOCUMENTATION NEEDS AND CITIZENSHIP 83 GENERAL 83 MANY IDPS HAVE LOST THEIR PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS (1999) 83 ISSUES OF FAMILY UNITY, IDENTITY AND CULTURE 84 GENERAL 84 FATE OF GEORGIAN AND ABKHAZ MISSING PERSONS WHO DISAPPEARED DURING THE CONFLICT IN ABKHAZIA STILL UNKNOWN (2002) 84 CHANGING GENDER ROLE: DISPLACED WOMEN BECOME THE MAIN HOUSEHOLD INCOME EARNERS (2000) 84 3 MARITAL STATUS OF IDPS: SURVEYS INDICATE HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE PARENTS HOUSEHOLDS (2000-2002) 87 PROPERTY ISSUES 88 GENERAL 88 IDPS PURCHASING PROPERTY DO NOT LOSE THEIR IDP STATUS (2003) 88 LAND ALLOCATION TO IDPS: INCONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION (1992-2003) 88 PRIVATISATION IN SOUTH OSSETIA: RIGHTS OF IDPS AT RISK (2002) 90 PROPERTIES LEFT BEHIND: UNCERTAINTY ON THE RESTITUTION PROCESS (2002-2003) 91 INTERNATIONAL STUDY PROPOSES CONCRETE LEGAL AND POLITICAL MEASURES TO RESOLVE THE HOUSING AND PROPERTY ISSUE IN GEORGIA (1998) 93 RIGHT TO PROPERTY RESTITUTION: GEORGIAN NGO SUBMITS DRAFT LEGISLATION (1999) 94 DISCRIMINATORY IMPLEMENTATION OF HOUSING CODES COULD IMPEDE IDP RETURN TO ABKHAZIA (1999) 95 PATTERNS OF RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT 97 RETURN PROSPECTS 97 RETURN HAMPERED BY WIDESPREAD POVERTY IN SOUTH OSSETIA (2003) 97 UN ENDEAVOURS TO PUT RETURN ON THE NEGOTIATIONS' AGENDA (2003) 98 UN SUPPORTS CONFIDENCE BUILDING MEASURES TO IMPROVE SECURITY IN RETURN AREAS (2003) 99 UN CONTINUE TO MONITOR RETURN CONDITIONS IN GALI AND ZUGDIDI SECTORS (2002) 101 INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS HAVE BEEN MANDATED TO ASSIST IN CREATING CONDITIONS FOR RETURN (2000-2001) 102 JOINT ASSESSMENT MISSION TO THE GALI DISTRICT EVALUATE CONDITIONS FOR THE RETURN OF THE DISPLACED (NOVEMBER 2000) 103 INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN AGENCIES ARE RELUCTANT TO UNDERTAKE PROGRAMMES THAT MAY ENCOURAGE RETURN TO UNSAFE AREAS (2000) 104 UN SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE CONDUCTS BILATERAL CONSULTATIONS ON KEY ISSUES, INCLUDING RETURN TO ABKHAZIA (2000) 105 SOME INTERNALLY DISPLACED HAVE OPTED FOR RESETTLEMENT (2000) 106 DE FACTO ABKHAZ AUTHORITIES TAKE UNILATERAL INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE RETURN TO THE GALI REGION (JANUARY 1999) 106 RETURN MOVEMENTS 107 RETURN TO ABKHAZIA CONTINUES DESPITE INSECURITY (2003) 107 UNHCR FACILITATES RETURN TO SOUTH OSSETIA (2003) 108 SEASONAL NATURE OF RETURN TO THE GALI DISTRICT (2000) 109 DE FACTO ABKHAZ AUTHORITIES ALLEGEDLY EXAGGERATE NUMBER OF GEORGIAN RETURNEES IN GALI (1999) 110 UNHCR 1994 RETURN PLAN FAILS (1995) 111 HUMANITARIAN ACCESS 113 GENERAL 113 SECURITY CONSTRAINTS AFFECTS DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO ABKZAZIA AND WESTERN GEORGIA (2001-2002) 113 4 NGOS DENOUNCE CORRUPTION (2002) 114 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RESPONSES 115 NATIONAL RESPONSE 115 GEORGIAN GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE IDP SITUATION -STRUCTURES AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK (1992-2003) 115 NEW APPROACH TO IDP ASSISTANCE: AN ADVOCACY INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SELF-RELIANCE OF IDPS (1999-2003) 117 IDPS PROTEST AGAINST THE SLOW PAYMENT OF ALLOWANCES (2003-2004) 119 INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE 119 UNHCR SCALES DOWN DIRECT ASSISTANCE TO IDPS (2004) 119 UNOMIG'S PRESENCE CONTRIBUTES TO THE RETURN OF THE DISPLACED TO THE GALI DISTRICT (1993-2004) 120 EXPANDING HUMANITARIAN ACTIVITIES IN ABKHAZIA (2003) 122 LOW INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE IN SOUTH OSSETIA (2003) 124 UN SPONSORS REVIEW OF IDP RIGHTS (2003) 125 UNHCR: SCALE OF OPERATIONS IN RESPECT WITH IDPS WILL CONTINUE TO DECREASE IN 2003 127 THE HUMAN RIGHT OFFICE IN ABKHAZIA: A COMPONENT OF THE UN OBSERVER MISSION (1996- 2003) 128 THE GEORGIA SELF-RELIANCE FUND (GRSF): SUPPORT TO INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR IDPS' INTEGRATION (1999-2003) 130 WFP EXTENDS ITS FOOD ASSISTANCE TO VULNERABLE GROUPS (2003) 132 PERMANENT HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR IDPS: A SWISS-SPONSORED PROGRAMME (2002-2003) 133 DONORS DO NO LONGER EXPLICITLY TARGET
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs
    Subgenus Lasius Fabricius, 1804 53. L. (Lasius) alienus (Foerster, 1850) Distribution: E.G.: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Bursachili, Gardabani, Grakali, Gudauri, Gveleti, Igoeti, Iraga, Kasristskali, Kavtiskhevi, Kazbegi, Kazreti, Khrami gorge, Kianeti, Kitsnisi, Kojori, Kvishkheti, Lagodekhi Reserve, Larsi, Lekistskali gorge, Luri, Manglisi, Mleta, Mtskheta, Nichbisi, Pantishara, Pasanauri, Poladauri, Saguramo, Sakavre, Samshvilde, Satskhenhesi, Shavimta, Shulaveri, Sighnaghi, Taribana, Tbilisi (Mushtaidi Garden, Tbilisi Botanical Garden), Tetritskaro, Tkemlovani, Tkviavi, Udabno, Zedazeni (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1964a, b, 1966, 1967b, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Abasha, Ajishesi, Akhali Atoni, Anaklia, Anaria, Baghdati, Batumi Botanical Garden, Bichvinta Reserve, Bjineti, Chakvi, Chaladidi, Chakvistskali, Eshera, Grigoreti, Ingiri, Inkiti Lake, Kakhaberi, Khobi, Kobuleti, Kutaisi, Lidzava, Menji, Nakalakebi, Natanebi, Ochamchire, Oni, Poti, Senaki, Sokhumi, Sviri, Tsaishi, Tsalenjikha, Tsesi, Zestaponi, Zugdidi Botanical Garden (Ruzsky, 1905; Karavaiev, 1926; Jijilashvili, 1974b); S.G.: Abastumani, Akhalkalaki, Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Avralo, Bakuriani, Bogdanovka, Borjomi, Dmanisi, Goderdzi Pass, Gogasheni, Kariani, Khanchali Lake, Ota, Paravani Lake, Sapara, Tabatskuri, Trialeti, Tsalka, Zekari Pass (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1967a, 1974a). 54. L. (Lasius) brunneus (Latreille, 1798) Distribution: E.G.: Bolnisi, Gardabani, Kianeti, Kiketi, Manglisi, Pasanauri (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Akhali Atoni, Baghdati,
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Case Study Part II: Internally Displaced Persons Viewed Externally
    Georgia Case Study Part II: Internally Displaced Persons Viewed Externally Brian Frydenborg Experiential Applications – MNPS 703 Allison Frendak-Blume, Ph.D. The problem of internally displaced persons (referred to commonly as IDPs) and international refugees is as old as the problem of war itself. As a special report of The Jerusalem Post notes, “Wars produce refugees” (Radler n.d., par. 1). The post-Cold-War conflicts in Georgia between Georgia, Russian, and Georgia‟s South Ossetia and Abkhazia regions displaced roughly 223,000 people, mostly from the Abkhazia part of the conflict, and the recent fighting between Georgia and Russia/South Ossetia/Abkhazia of August 2008 created 127,000 such IDPs and refugees (UNHCR 2009a, par. 1). A United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) mission even before the 2008 fighting “described the needs of Georgia's displaced as „overwhelming‟” (Ibid., par. 2). This paper will discuss the problem of IDPs in Georgia, particularly as related to the Abkhazian part of the conflicts of the last few decades. It will highlight the efforts of one international organization (IO), the UNHCR, and one non-governmental organization (NGO), the Danish Refugee Council. i. Focus of Paper and Definitions The UN divides people as uprooted by conflict into two categories: refugees and internally displaced persons; the first group refers to people who are “forcibly uprooted” and flee from their nation to another, the second to people who are “forcibly uprooted” and flee to another location within their nation (UNHCR 2009b, par 1). Although there are also IDPs and refugees resulting from the fighting in South Ossetia, this paper will focus on the IDPs from the fighting in and around Abkhazia; refugees from or in Georgia will not be dealt with specifically because the overwhelming majority of people uprooted from their homes in relation to Georgia‟s ethnic conflicts ended up being IDPs (close to 400,000 total current and returned) and less than 13,000 people were classified as refugees from these conflicts (UNHCR 2009a, par.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Link Between Power Concentration and Ethnic Minorities’ Mobilization in Post Soviet Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine
    Exploring the Link between Power Concentration and Ethnic Minorities’ Mobilization in Post Soviet Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine by Stela Garaz Department of Political Science, Central European University A Doctoral Dissertation submitted to the Central European University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date of submission: April 30, 2012 Supervisor: Dr. Zsolt Enyedi Budapest, Hungary 2012 I hereby declare that this thesis contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. I hereby declare that this thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by any other person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Stela Garaz Budapest April 30, 2012. ii Abstract In political science literature, power concentration is dominantly viewed as a negative phenomenon that encourages strategies of confrontation and causes protest. The regimes with concentrated power are believed to be particularly dangerous for the states with deep ethnic cleavages. This latter concern is a question of great importance for the post-Soviet region, because since the collapse of the Soviet Union some of the multi-ethnic post-Soviet states had the experience of both ethnic conflicts and concentration of power. Consequently, the main goal of this research is to determine whether power concentration encourages the escalation of ethnic conflicts. For this, I explore three mechanisms that may link the degree of power concentration with ethnic minorities’ mobilization against the state: identity-related state policies, electoral rules, and centralization. The empirical investigation is built on the analysis of three post-Soviet cases – Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine – based on the structured focused comparison technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Sub-Regional Innovation Policy Outlook 2020: Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus
    GEORGIA Sub-regional Innovation Policy Outlook 2020: Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus Chapter I ECONOMIC OVERVIEW General overview Georgia is a small, upper-middle-income country in the South Caucasus, connecting Europe to the Middle East and Central Asia. Since independence in 1991, the ensuing civil war and territorial disputes have made the transition to a market economy particularly challenging. Even so, Georgia is now one of the most open and easiest places to do business in the sub-region, with sustained albeit volatile growth. To continue to sustain growth and benefit from its manifold opportunities, however, Georgia needs to make better and systematic use of its potential, moving from a model of filling essential gaps to one based on broader experimentation with new and better ideas, business models, technology and governance arrangements. Reform process The radical improvement in Georgia stems from a series of far-reaching reforms. Following the Rose Revolution in 2003, structural changes in the institutional and legislative frameworks radically reduced petty corruption and improved the efficiency of government. Trade liberalization, including a range of free trade agreements, secured access to a diverse set of markets. Reforms of public financial management are under way, including the recently developed fiscal framework, changes in civil service pay and a transition to compulsory savings for retirement. As a result, Georgia has moved up quickly in the Ease of Doing Business ranking of the World Bank (2020a), reaching seventh place globally for regulatory performance. Although several efforts are under way, such as more investment into infrastructure, education and administration, further reforms are needed to restructure, diversify and increase the productivity of the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Container Market and Georgia's Positioning
    European Scientific Journal November 2018 edition Vol.14, No.31 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Black Sea Container Market and Georgia’s Positioning Irakli Danelia, (PhD student) Tbilisi State University, Georgia Doi:10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 Abstract Due to the strategically important geographical location, Black Sea region has a key transit function throughout between Europe and Asia. Georgia, which is a part of Black sea area, has a vital transit function for Caucasus Region, as well as for whole New Silk Road area. Nevertheless, still there is no evidence what kind of role and place Georgia has in The Black Sea container market. As the country has ambition to be transit hub for containerizes cargo flows between west and east and is actively involved in the process of formation “One Belt One Road” project, it is very important to identify Country’s current circumstances, capacities and future potential. Because of this, the purpose of the study is to investigate cargo flows and opportunities of the Black Sea container market, level of competitiveness in the area and define Georgia’s positioning in the regional Container market. Keywords: Geostrategic Location, New Silk Road, Transit Corridor, Cargo flow, Container market, Georgia, Black Sea Methodology Based on practical and theoretical significance of the research the following paper provides systemic, historical and logical generalization methods of research in the performance of the work, scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis methods are also used. Introduction Since the end of the Cold War, the Black Sea region has no longer been a static border between the West and the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Russian Way of War Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia
    Analyzing the Russian Way of War Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia Lionel Beehner A Contemporary Battlefield Assessment Liam Collins by the Modern War Institute Steve Ferenzi Robert Person Aaron Brantly March 20, 2018 Analyzing the Russian Way of War: Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter I – History of Bad Blood ................................................................................................................ 13 Rose-Colored Glasses .............................................................................................................................. 16 Chapter II – Russian Grand Strategy in Context of the 2008 Russia-Georgia War ................................... 21 Russia’s Ends ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Russia’s Means ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Russia’s Ways .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Action in the Caucasus: a Guide for Practitioners
    HUMANITARIAN ACTION IN THE CAUCASUS: A GUIDE FOR PRACTITIONERS Greg Hansen Humanitarianism and War Project & Local Capacities for Peace Project i Published by The Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies Brown University, Box 1970 2 Stimson Avenue Providence, RI 02912 USA Telephone: (401) 863-2809 Fax: (401) 863-1270 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Watson_Institute/ Thomas J. Biersteker, Ph.D., Director Frederick F. Fullerton, Writer/Editor Nancy Soukup, Writer/Editor George Potter, Staff Assistant Statements of fact or opinions are solely those of the authors; their publication does not imply endorsement by the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. Copyright 1998 by the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. All rights reserved under International and Pan American Convention. No part of this report may be reproduced by any other means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to Publications Group, Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. ii CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................................................... v Author’s Note...............................................................................................................................ix Acronyms......................................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Russia As a Humanitarian Aid Donor
    OXFAM DISCUSSION PAPER 15 JULY 2013 RUSSIA AS A HUMANITARIAN AID DONOR ANNA BREZHNEVA AND DARIA UKHOVA This paper addresses the role of Russia as a humanitarian aid donor in the context of the increasing participation in international aid of so-called ‘new’, ‘emerging’ (or ‘re-emerging’), or ‘non-traditional’ donors. In the recent years Russia has made a number of international aid commitments, for example within the G8, marking its re-emergence as an international donor since the disintegration of the Soviet Union. In line with Russia’s increasing international aid commitments, the level of Russian humanitarian aid has also been increasing over recent years. Nonetheless, the country still faces several obstacles in developing its donor capacity. Oxfam Discussion Papers Oxfam Discussion Papers are written to contribute to public debate and to invite feedback on development and humanitarian policy issues. They are ‟work in progress‟ documents, and do not necessarily constitute final publications or reflect Oxfam policy positions. The views and recommendations expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Oxfam. For more information, or to comment on this paper, email Daria Ukhova [[email protected]] www.oxfam.org CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................ 2 1 Introduction .................................................................... 4 2 Institutional arrangements .............................................. 5 3 How much aid? ..............................................................
    [Show full text]