DOCSLIB.ORG

Changing Relations Russia's Relations with Ukraine and Belarus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

McMahon, Margery A. (2000) Changing relations: Russia's relations with Ukraine and Belarus. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2457/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Changing Relations Russia's Relations with Ukraine and Belarus by Margery A. Me Mahon BA, M.Phil. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented to The Institute of Central and East European Studies University of Glasgow April 2000 (c) M A N1c Mahon 2000 Abstract In the period of transition which followed the collapse of the USSR, the states of that region were forced to make many political and economic adjustments. A crucial part of the process was the restructuring of relations among these formerly fraternal republics and as they became in 1991, independent states. F or most states structuring relations with Russia became a priority since it is the largest and most dominant regional actor. Such relations are shaped by a number of factors including historical development, economic legacies and geopolitical concerns. These issues have impacted upon the evolving relationship between Russia and its Slav neighbours, Ukraine and Belarus. Drawing on a common background in terms of historical political, economic and cultural development, Russia's relations with these states developed to the point where they were formalized in a Russian Belarusian Community (1996) and a Russian Ukrainian Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation (1997). The impetus for Russia to renegotiate its relations with the states on its western borders was strengthened by the proposed eastward expansion of NATO. Belarus and Ukraine however benefited from this. Belarus was guaranteed cheap supplies of Russian natural resources, vital for its economy, even if this came at the cost of ceding a degree of sovereignty. Ukraine, still excluded from European political and economic organizations was recognized by Russia as independent state and significant regional influence. Russia secured a buffer zone on its western borders. Russia's relations with Ukraine and Belarus are now qualitatively different. Ukraine has emerged as a potential allYarn:I.~en future rival to Russia while Belarus has opted to become a Russian ciienfstate with, it appears, the ultimate goal of union with Russia. Acknowledgements I am indebted to a number of people who have assisted and encouraged me during my studies. Particular thanks go to the staff of the Institute of Central and East European Studies, notably my supervisor Mrs Tanya Frisby and to Professor Stephen White, Department of Politics, who read and advised on several chapters. Dr James Whites provided support and encouragement from an early stage. I am also grateful to the University of Glasgow for its fmancial support in the form of a Doctoral Scholarship and assistance for overseas trave1. Thanks also to Mrs Kay McWalter for administrative assistance. Friends and family have been especially supportive throughout my research. I would also like to thank my husband, Greg and my parents for their confidence and support throughout this project. Changing Relations Russia's Relations with Ukraine and Belarus Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction, research rationale and orientation pl-8 Chapter 2 Russia's Relations with Ukraine and Belarus in Historical Context p9-53 Chapter 3 Emerging Partners: Relations among the Slav Republics 1985-91 p54-102 Chapter 4 Independence and Reintegration: The CIS and its impact on the relationship between the Slav nations after 1991 pl03-136 Chapter 5 Geopolitics and Russia's Relations with Ukraine and Belarus p137-174 Chapter 6 Maturation of relations between Russia, and Ukraine and Belarus 1996 & 1997 p175-210 Chapter 7 Statehood and Status: Perceptions of Statehood and Relations between Russia, and Ukraine and Belarus p211- 226 Chapter 8 Conclusion p227-232 Appendix 1 p233-234 Appendix 2 p235 Appendix 3 p236-248 Appendix 4 p249 Appendix 5 p250-p253 Appendix 6 p254-255 Bibliography p256- 272 List of Tables Table 1 Share of Ethnic Russians in overall population of Ukraine and Belarus 1989 p38 Table 2 Republics' share in the total gross output of the Union p39 Table 3 Belarus' % share in all union production 1989 p41 Table 4 Ukraine % share of all union production 1989 p43 Table 5 Volume of Trade (%) by Republic in internal market and with non USSR I CMEA partners. p44 Table 6 Total Industrial Output of Russia's key Industries p45 Table 7 Russia's Exports to Ukraine and Belarus as percentage of overall trade with Soviet Republics p48 Table 8 Russia's Imports from Ukraine and Belarus as percentage of its overall trade with Soviet Republics p48 Table 9 Results of All Union Referendum on Preservation of the Union p68 Table 10 Direct Russian Investment in Ukraine as percentage of overall foreign investment in Ukraine p 127 Table 11 Direct Ukrainian Investment in Russian Federation as percentage of overall Ukrainian investment p 127 Tables 12&13 Russia's Trade (Exports and Imports) with Ukraine and Belarus as % of overall exports to CIS states 1987-97 p128-129 Table 14 Russia's Financial Aid to Rouble Zone States 1992-93 p133 Table 15 Russia's Aid to Republics most populated by Russians p133 Table 16 Percentage Share of Ethnic Russians in overall population of Republic 1989 p144 Table 17 Republics' Share of Ethnic Russians 1989 (Ranked) p144 Table 18 Russian Aid to Republics most populated by Russians as Percentage of Republic's GDP p145 Table 19 Top Ten Destinations for Russian Exports (1995) (CIS & Non CIS) p191 Table 20 Top Ten Sources of Russian Imports (1995 (CIS and Non CIS) p192 Table 21 Ukraine's Foreign Trade with CIS states in 1995 p193 List of Abbreyiations Used BPF Belarusian Popular Front DB Democratic Block (Ukraine) CFE Conventional Forces in Europe CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CPE Centrally Planned Economy CPSU Communist Party of the Soviet Union CPU Communist Party of Ukraine FSU Fonner Soviet Union FYP Five Year Plan NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NIS Newly Independent States OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe RB Republic of Belarus RCB Russian Central Bank RF Russian Federation RSFSR Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic RMFA Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs SCPE Soviet Centrally Planned Economy START Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty UDB Ukrainian Democratic Block UHU Ukrainian Helsinki Union WTO Warsaw Treaty Organization Chapter 1 Introduction When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the submerged nations which had been contained or suppressed by communism emerged as nation states. The legitimacy of claims to nation state status was undisputed in several instances, notably Russia, the former centre of the Tsarist and Soviet empires and the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, whose forcible incorporation into the USSR in 1940 had since been acknowledged and condemned by all, even Russia. Some nations, chiefly Ukraine, had a history of movements striving for striving for national autonomy and even independence but had experienced these only briefly in the past, if . at all. Others however had weaker claims to legitimacy, borne of their artificial construction within the so called federation that was the USSR. Amongst these are included the Central Asian states and Belarus, the third of the Slavic states of the European part of the USSR. I The three states examined in this thesis fit into each of these categories. Russia, with a largely incontestable right to statehood; Ukraine with a strong sense of national destiny but only limited experience of statehood, and Belarus, with an under-developed sense of national identity and consciousness. The issue of legitimacy and strong historical and sociopolitical foundations for independence was to be of great importance in the consolidation of nation statehood in the post independence period. For these new states, independence meant a restructuring programme - abandoning the centrally controlled political and economic systems of the Soviet era and replacing them with a pluralist democracy and free market economy. Some have progressed more rapidly than others and this is due to a number of factors. The success of Russia is attributed to the favourable infrastructure created by the Soviet regime as well as its plentiful resources. For the Baltic states, their experience of independence in the interior period had a strong impact on their post-Soviet adaptation, as well as favourable infrastructures. However these factors alone do not guarantee success. Both Ukraine and Belarus boast comparatively well developed infrastructures and sufficient resources yet have been less successful in their economic restructuring. This is partially explained by a strong predilection for Soviet style politics and economics, most evident in Belarus but also acting as a restraint on more radical reform in Ukraine. The involvement of western financial and political institutions (e.g. The International Monetary Fund and the Council of Europe) as well as Western governments (e.g. the British Government's 'Know How Fund') in the restructuring process led academics, politicians and the Western media to focus primarily on internal political and economic developments once key international issues such as nuclear weapons had been resolved. By and large this reflected a Russo-centric approach recognising that Russia was the dominant state in the region of the former Soviet Union (FSU).
Recommended publications
  • "Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict" by H

    "Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict" by H

    University of California, Berkeley Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict Harsha Ram Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict Harsha Ram Summer 1999 Harsha Ram is an assistant professor in the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures at UC Berkeley Edited by Anna Wertz BPS gratefully acknowledges support from the National Security Education Program for providing funding for the publication of this Working Paper .
  • Zhuk Outcover.Indd

    Zhuk Outcover.Indd

    The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Sergei I. Zhuk Number 1906 Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Number 1906 Sergei I. Zhuk Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 Sergei I. Zhuk is Associate Professor of Russian and East European History at Ball State University. His paper is part of a new research project, “The West in the ‘Closed City’: Cultural Consumption, Identities, and Ideology of Late Socialism in Soviet Ukraine, 1964–84.” Formerly a Professor of American History at Dniepropetrovsk University in Ukraine, he completed his doctorate degree in Russian History at the Johns Hopkins University in 2002 and recently published Russia’s Lost Reformation: Peasants, Millennialism, and Radical Sects in Southern Russia and Ukraine, 1830–1917 (2004). No. 1906, June 2008 © 2008 by The Center for Russian and East European Studies, a program of the University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh ISSN 0889-275X Image from cover: Rock performance by Dniepriane near the main building of Dniepropetrovsk University, August 31, 1980. Photograph taken by author. The Carl Beck Papers Editors: William Chase, Bob Donnorummo, Ronald H. Linden Managing Editor: Eileen O’Malley Editorial Assistant: Vera Dorosh Sebulsky Submissions to The Carl Beck Papers are welcome. Manuscripts must be in English, double-spaced throughout, and between 40 and 90 pages in length. Acceptance is based on anonymous review. Mail submissions to: Editor, The Carl Beck Papers, Center for Russian and East European Studies, 4400 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
  • The Anti-Imperial Choice This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Anti-Imperial Choice the Making of the Ukrainian Jew

    The Anti-Imperial Choice This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Anti-Imperial Choice the Making of the Ukrainian Jew

    the anti-imperial choice This page intentionally left blank The Anti-Imperial Choice The Making of the Ukrainian Jew Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern Yale University Press new haven & london Disclaimer: Some images in the printed version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Copyright © 2009 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and ex- cept by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Ehrhardt type by The Composing Room of Michigan, Inc. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petrovskii-Shtern, Iokhanan. The anti-imperial choice : the making of the Ukrainian Jew / Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-13731-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Jewish literature—Ukraine— History and criticism. 2. Jews in literature. 3. Ukraine—In literature. 4. Jewish authors—Ukraine. 5. Jews— Ukraine—History— 19th century. 6. Ukraine—Ethnic relations. I. Title. PG2988.J4P48 2009 947.7Ј004924—dc22 2008035520 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). It contains 30 percent postconsumer waste (PCW) and is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). 10987654321 To my wife, Oxana Hanna Petrovsky This page intentionally left blank Contents Acknowledgments ix Politics of Names and Places: A Note on Transliteration xiii List of Abbreviations xv Introduction 1 chapter 1.
  • Russian Coal Mining in Svalbard

    Russian Coal Mining in Svalbard

    Russian Coal Mining in Svalbard An Examination of Sovereignty and Arctic Cooperation Group 25 Narin Zimbalista, Luna Persson, Zoe Svendsen & Julie Sejr Reventlow Characters: 141595 1 1. Introduction 4 Research Question 7 Supporting Questions 7 Research Design 7 2. Background Information 8 2.1 A Brief History of Svalbard 8 2.1.1 Mining as a Settlement Builder 9 2.1.2. Russian and Norwegian interests in Svalbard 10 2.2 Geopolitical Context in the Arctic 11 2.2.1 Russian conduct in the Arctic 12 2.2.2 Barents Sea Dispute 13 3. Literature Review 15 3.1 An overview of the Arctic conflict 15 3.2 Theoretical Considerations within the literature 17 3.3 Russia in the Arctic 18 3.4 Svalbard and the Russian Presence 19 3.5 Concluding Considerations 20 4. Theoretical Framework 22 4.1 Realism 22 4.1.1 Economic Nationalism 24 4.2 Constructivism 26 4.3 Main theoretical deductions 28 5. Methodology 31 5.1 Philosophy of Science 31 5.1.1 Realism 31 5.1.2 Constructivism 33 5.2 Methods 34 5.2.1 Content analysis 34 5.2.2 Documents as data 37 5.3 Results 39 5.3.1 - Thematic Coding Results 39 5.3.2 Summarizing Qualitative Content Analysis Results 42 6. Analysis 46 6.1 How is Russia utilizing coal mining in Svalbard to project influence? 46 6.2 How has the Svalbard Treaty and the UNCLOS constructed norms and rules that have affected the contemporary jurisdiction of Svalbard? 51 2 6.3 How can Realism and Constructivism offer insight to Russian and Norwegian behaviour in Svalbard? 55 7.
  • Trump's False 'Realism'

    Trump's False 'Realism'

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University International Bulletin of Political Psychology Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 2 1-13-2020 Trump’s False ‘Realism’ Muhammad Ali Baig National Defence University, Pakistan, [email protected] Syed Sabir Muhammad University of Peshawar, Pakistan, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp Part of the American Politics Commons, International Economics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Baig, Muhammad Ali and Muhammad, Syed Sabir (2020) "Trump’s False ‘Realism’," International Bulletin of Political Psychology: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp/vol20/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Bulletin of Political Psychology by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Baig and Muhammad: Trump’s False ‘Realism’ TRUMP’S FALSE ‘REALISM’ Muhammad Ali Baig* and Syed Sabir Muhammad** Abstract Foreign policy pivoted upon realist principles has have remained a vital instrument to pursue, achieve, secure and sustain the policy objectives of a state. America being the liberal hegemonic state maintained ‘liberal hegemony’ since the end of the Second World War. Realists intended to adopt a realist foreign policy; however, ideologies like ‘American Exceptionalism’ dominated over the former. President Donald Trump opted for protectionism with the objective of strengthening U.S. indigenous economy – a realist approach. Nevertheless, Trump’s foreign dealings in relation to America’s allies are causing damage to the established balance of power and the hard-earned trust of allies.
  • Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus Eric R

    Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus Eric R

    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 28 Article 7 Number 1 Fall 2004 1-1-2004 Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus Eric R. Reed Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric R. Reed, Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus, 28 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 147 (2004). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol28/iss1/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Descent into Authoritarianism: Barriers to Constitutional Rule in Belarus By ERIC R. REED* Introduction The collapse of the Soviet Union has allowed the legal community to observe the creation and early trials of several new constitutions. One notable commentator referred to East-Central Europe as a "constitutional laboratory."' Few expected the rule of law to graft easily onto governments and peoples ruled for decades by authoritarian regimes. As expected, the progress made by these states in the last decade varies. Belarus arguably achieved least, and remains classified generally as a state reverting to authoritarianism. 2 President and former collective farm manager Alexander Lukashenka's political abuses deserve some share of blame for this backsliding. However, additional political, social, and judicial factors hinder Belarus' transition to the rule of law.
  • President Clinton's Meetings & Telephone Calls with Foreign

    President Clinton's Meetings & Telephone Calls with Foreign

    President Clinton’s Meetings & Telephone Calls with Foreign Leaders, Representatives, and Dignitaries from January 23, 1993 thru January 19, 20011∗ 1993 Telephone call with President Boris Yeltsin of Russia, January 23, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of Israel, January 23, 1993, White House Telephone call with President Leonid Kravchuk of Ukraine, January 26, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, January 29, 1993, White House Telephone call with Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel of Turkey, February 1, 1993, White House Meeting with Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel of Germany, February 4, 1993, White House Meeting with Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada, February 5, 1993, White House Meeting with President Turgut Ozal of Turkey, February 8, 1993, White House Telephone call with President Stanislav Shushkevich of Belarus, February 9, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with President Boris Yeltsin of Russia, February 10, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with Prime Minister John Major of the United Kingdom, February 10, 1993, White House Telephone call with Chancellor Helmut Kohl of Germany, February 10, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, February 10, 1993, White House 1∗ Meetings that were only photo or ceremonial events are not included in this list. Meeting with Foreign Minister Michio Watanabe of Japan, February 11, 1993,
  • The Avoidable War Reflections on U.S.-China Relations and the End of Strategic Engagement

    The Avoidable War Reflections on U.S.-China Relations and the End of Strategic Engagement

    An Asia Society Policy Institute Publication The Avoidable War Reflections on U.S.-China Relations and the End of Strategic Engagement BY THE HONORABLE KEVIN RUDD, President, Asia Society Policy Institute The Avoidable War: Reflections on U.S.-China Relations and the End of Strategic Engagement A COLLECTION OF MAJOR SPEECHES DURING 2018 THE HONORABLE KEVIN RUDD PRESIDENT, ASIA SOCIETY POLICY INSTITUTE JANUARY 2019 POLICY INSTITUTE With a solution-oriented mandate, the Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) tackles major policy challenges con- fronting the Asia-Pacific in security, prosperity, sustainability, and the development of common norms and values for the region. The Asia Society Policy Institute is a think- and do-tank designed to bring forth policy ideas that incorporate the best thinking from top experts in Asia and to work with policymakers to integrate these ideas and put them into practice. ABOUT THE AUTHOR The Honorable Kevin Rudd served as Australia’s 26th Prime Minister (2007–10, 2013) and as Foreign Minister (2010–12). He led Australia’s response during the Global Financial Crisis—the only major developed economy not to go into recession—and co-founded the G20. Mr. Rudd joined the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York as its inaugural President in January 2015. He serves as Chair of the Board of the International Peace Institute and Chair of Sanitation and Water for All. He is a Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, a Distinguished Fellow at Chatham House in London, a Distinguished Statesman with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington D.C., and a Distinguished Fellow at the Paulson Institute in Chicago.
  • Ambiguous Threats and External Influences in the Baltic States Phase 2: Assessing the Threat

    Ambiguous Threats and External Influences in the Baltic States Phase 2: Assessing the Threat

    UNCLASSIFIED Asymmetric Operations Working Group Ambiguous Threats and External Influences in the Baltic States Phase 2: Assessing the Threat November 2015 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not current U.S. doctrine or policy and is not meant to supersede doctrine, commander’s guidance, or established unit standard operating procedures. Examine and use the information in light of your mission, the operational environment, the Law of Armed Conflict, and other situational factors. This document does not constitute the provision of additional information or the approval of additional information upon request. Copyright Notice: This document may contain copyrighted information. UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................................................3 The Baltic States are not Northeast European Versions of Crimea ...............................................................................4 STRATEGIC POSTURE ...................................................................................................................................................................7
  • POLS 4610 International Relations: Theory And

    POLS 4610 International Relations: Theory And

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ POLS 4610 International Relations: Theory and Practice- MO1- Fall 2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Class time: Wednesday 18:30-21:15 (with a break at 19:45) Credits: 3 Room: PRH 16 Modality: This class is taught face-to-face on the Madrid campus. For exceptional circumstances and some of the guest speaker events, a class Zoom link is provided. Class Zoom link: https://slu.zoom.us/j/93753477612?pwd=cUdUTzBJUVJ6ZWFiRldBUFdTb0VQZz09 Prerequisites: For Political Science/IR Majors: POLS 1000 or 1600, POLS 1500, POLS 2000 and Senior Standing Instructor and Email: Simona Rentea, Ph.D., [email protected] Office: San Ignacio Hall 310 Office hours: Monday 17:00-19:00 (via Zoom) and Wednesday 14:00-15:00 (in office SIH 310). To arrange an alternative time, email the instructor. Office Hour Zoom link: https://slu.zoom.us/j/94941006188?pwd=cmZFSFd5UUxNV2hxSUEzNVBKTmhIQT09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description: The principal purpose of this course is to explore the key theoretical traditions in the discipline of International Relations. There is little agreement as to what International Relations theory is and should be about. Questions of gender inequality and human emancipation are as much a part of International Relations theory today as questions of sovereignty, balance of power and the conduct of war. The aim of the course is threefold. Firstly, it introduces students to fundamental texts and thinkers in political realism, liberalism, constructivism, Marxism, feminism, and postcolonialism in International Relations. Particular attention will be paid to the assumptions, claims, and modes of reasoning that distinguish these theories from one another. Second, it compares and contrasts their different interpretations of the “international” in relation to key methodological and epistemological areas of disagreement.
  • Donbas in Flames

    Donbas in Flames

    GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
  • OSW Report | Opposites Put Together. Belarus's Politics of Memory

    OSW Report | Opposites Put Together. Belarus's Politics of Memory

    OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk WARSAW OCTOBER 2020 OPPOSITES PUT TOGETHER BELARUS’S POLITICS OF MEMORY Kamil Kłysiński, Wojciech Konończuk © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt EDITOR Szymon Sztyk CO-OPERATION Tomasz Strzelczyk, Katarzyna Kazimierska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH DTP IMAGINI PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Jimmy Tudeschi / Shutterstock.com Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, 00-564 Warsaw, Poland tel.: (+48) 22 525 80 00, [email protected] www.osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-56-2 Contents MAIN POINTS | 5 INTRODUCTION | 11 I. THE BACKGROUND OF THE BELARUSIAN POLITICS OF MEMORY | 14 II. THE SEARCH FOR ITS OWN WAY. ATTEMPTS TO DEFINE HISTORICAL IDENTITY (1991–1994) | 18 III. THE PRO-RUSSIAN DRIFT. THE IDEOLOGISATION OF THE POLITICS OF MEMORY (1994–2014) | 22 IV. CREATING ELEMENTS OF DISTINCTNESS. A CAUTIOUS TURN IN MEMORY POLITICS (2014–) | 27 1. The cradle of statehood: the Principality of Polotsk | 28 2. The powerful heritage: the Grand Duchy of Lithuania | 32 3. Moderate scepticism: Belarus in the Russian Empire | 39 4. A conditional acceptance: the Belarusian People’s Republic | 47 5. The neo-Soviet narrative: Belarusian territories in the Second Polish Republic | 50 6. Respect with some reservations: Belarus in the Soviet Union | 55 V. CONCLUSION. THE POLICY OF BRINGING OPPOSITES TOGETHER | 66 MAIN POINTS • Immediately after 1991, the activity of nationalist circles in Belarus led to a change in the Soviet historical narrative, which used to be the only permit­ ted one. However, they did not manage to develop a coherent and effective politics of memory or to subsequently put this new message across to the public.