Development of Competition in the European Postal Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of Competition in the European Postal Sector Development of competition in the European postal sector MARKT/2004/03/C Final study The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of the European Commission Client: European Commission, Internal Market DG ECORYS Macro & Sector Policies Dr. Nick van der Lijn Arno Meijer Patrick de Bas Dr. Bjørn Volkerink In cooperation with Business Consult Hans Kok Rotterdam, July 2005 ECORYS-NEI P.O. Box 4175 3006 AD Rotterdam Watermanweg 44 3067 GG Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 10 453 88 00 F +31 10 453 07 68 E [email protected] W www.ecorys.nl Registration no. 24316726 NvdL/SMi/AR11944_Final report Table of contents Preface 11 Executive summary 13 1 Introduction 33 1.1 Objective of the study 33 1.2 Policy context 33 1.3 Sources of information and activities undertaken 34 1.4 Research method and outline of the report 35 2 Description of the postal market 39 2.1 Introduction 39 2.2 Segmentation of the postal market 39 2.2.1 Market segmentation along postal products 39 2.2.2 Market segmentation using other criteria 40 2.3 The postal value chain 41 2.3.1 Traditional postal supply chain 41 2.3.2 Modern postal value chain 42 2.3.3 The supply chain of express and courier services 43 2.4 Regulation of the postal sector in the Member States 44 2.4.1 Postal directives 97/67/EC and 2002/39/EC 44 2.4.2 Provision of universal services 45 2.4.3 Liberalisation of postal markets in the Member States 45 2.5 Mail volumes in the Member States 48 2.6 Summary and conclusion 53 3 Potential for competition in the postal sector 55 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 The five forces model of Porter 55 3.2.1 Risk of new competitors entering the industry 56 3.2.2 Threat of potential substitutes 57 3.2.3 Bargaining power of buyers 58 3.2.4 Bargaining power of suppliers 59 3.2.5 Degree of rivalry between existing competitors 59 3.2.6 Government regulations 59 3.3 Preliminary assessment of contestability of market segments 61 3.3.1 Introduction: barriers to entry and contestability 61 3.3.2 Which market segments are contestable? 61 3.3.3 Natural barriers to entry 63 3.4 Network access: justification and economic rationale 68 3.5 Summary and conclusion 72 4 Development of competition in the EU Member States 75 4.1 Introduction 75 4.2 Development of competition in the Member States 75 4.2.1 Overview of the development of competition in the Member States 75 4.2.2 Some country examples 81 4.3 Factors that influence the development of effective competition 87 4.3.1 Legal barriers to entry 87 4.3.2 Strategic barriers to entry 90 4.3.3 Level playing field 92 4.4 Effects of competition on the market 94 4.5 Summary and conclusion 94 4.5.1 Development of competition in the Member States 94 4.5.2 Key factors influencing the development of competition 96 4.5.3 Disputes and role of a postal sector regulator 96 5 Strategies of competitor and national postal operators 99 5.1 Introduction 99 5.2 Considerations of customers of postal operators 99 5.3 Strategies of competitor postal operators 105 5.3.1 Case study 1: new entrants in the advertising mail segment 105 5.3.2 Case study 2: new entrants in the domestic addressed mail market segments 107 5.3.3 Case study 3: developments in countries with network access 110 5.3.4 Summary of strategies and business models of competitor postal operators 113 5.3.5 When do competitor postal operators break even? 114 5.4 Strategies of national postal operators 115 5.4.1 Facts and figures for national postal operators 115 5.4.2 Strategic orientation of the national postal operator 117 5.4.3 Economies of scope between mail, express and logistics 119 5.4.4 Legal status of the national postal operators - searching for outside investors 119 5.5 Summary and conclusion 123 6 Likely development of competition in a liberalised environment 127 6.1 Introduction 127 6.2 Expected market developments 128 6.2.1 Expected volume developments per mail segment 128 6.2.2 Expected technological developments 129 6.3 Likely business models of competitor postal operators 130 6.3.1 The development of a full service concept 130 6.3.2 The development of a low cost model 131 6.3.3 The development of activities in part of the value chain 132 6.3.4 The development of niche markets 132 6.3.5 Technology of the production process and value added services 133 6.4 Expected strategic behaviour of national postal operators 133 6.4.1 Strategic behaviour of national postal operators on domestic markets 133 6.4.2 Strategic behaviour of national postal operators on markets of other EU Member States 134 6.5 Expected competitive entry in a liberalised environment 134 6.5.1 Pattern of competitive entry 134 6.5.2 Scale of competitive entry 136 6.5.3 Expected competitive entry under alternative scenario’s 141 6.6 Likely effect on the postal sector in the Member States 143 6.6.1 Entry, contestability, and type of postal operators active on the market 143 6.6.2 Expected effect on market structure 145 6.6.3 Expected effect on services 146 6.6.4 Expected effect on prices 146 6.6.5 Expected effect on the universal service provision 148 6.7 Summary and conclusion 149 6.7.1 Pattern and scale of competitive entry 149 6.7.2 Entry, contestability and effect of liberalisation on market structure 151 6.7.3 Expected effect on market performance 153 7 Conclusion 155 7.1 Introduction 155 7.2 Summary of main findings and conclusions 155 7.2.1 Postal products and market segmentation 155 7.2.2 Liberalisation of postal markets until date 156 7.2.3 General development of internal competition until date 156 7.2.4 Strategies of postal operators 157 7.2.5 Key factors influencing the development of competition until date 159 7.2.6 Expected pattern of competitive entry in a liberalised environment 162 7.2.7 Expected scale of competitive entry in a liberalised environment 163 7.2.8 Entry, contestability and effect of liberalisation on market structure 164 7.2.9 Likely effect of liberalisation on market performance 166 7.3 Overall conclusion and recommendations 167 7.3.1 Overall conclusion 167 7.3.2 Recommendations 168 Annex I Appendix 1: Mail volumes by sender/receiver Appendix 2: Indicators for the five disciplinary forces of Porter Appendix 3: Authorisation and licensing Appendix 4: Regulation of network access Appendix 5: Opinion survey report Appendix 6: Overview of population density and urbanisation Appendix 7: Direct mail volumes Appendix 8: Market shares in the (liberalised) market for addressed mail Appendix 9: List of interviewed people and organisations Appendix 10: List of organisations that responded to the questionnaire Annex II (separate document) Country information sheets for the 25 EU Member States Preface The project team would like to thank all postal operators, policy makers, postal sector regulators and other organisations and experts that contributed to this study through completing our questionnaires, responding to specific questions and providing us with relevant documents and information. We are also grateful for the constructive cooperation with the European Commission, DG Internal Market, and others within the Commission. In particular we wish to thank Mr. Jörg Reinbothe (Head of Unit), Mr. Hughes de la Motte, Mr. Jonathan Read, and Ms. Dominique Scheerens from the Postal Unit, DG Internal Market, for their comments and support. We want to stress that the authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report and that the opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of the European Commission. Development of competition in the European postal sector 11 Executive summary Objective of the study This report is the result of a study that has been carried out for the European Commission, DG Internal Market, by ECORYS Nederland BV in cooperation with Business Consult BV from November 2004 to July 2005. The aim of the current study is on the one hand to describe the development of competition in the postal market and on the other hand to consider the possible future evolution of competition in a liberalised environment and provide documented and substantiated conclusions and recommendations. The study concentrates on developments in the letter mail market with a particular emphasis on the addressed mail market segment, acknowledging the fact that other segments have by and large already been liberalised and that a further liberalisation of the postal market concerns in particular the addressed mail market segment. Policy context The postal sector has undergone a significant transformation during the last decade. Many of the former traditional postal administrations have changed into corporations and in some cases have even been privatised or there are plans to do so. The business approaches of the national postal operators are changing and more explicit attention than before is given to cost efficiency and customer responsiveness. Technological developments influence the provision of postal services as well as the developments in adjacent markets, such as the communication market, the advertising market, and the express market. The above developments are reflected in the regulatory policy that has been set out by the European Commission through the directives 97/67/EC and 2002/39/EC.
Recommended publications
  • Royal Mail Annual Report
    Royal Mail plc Royal Mail plc Annual Report and Financial Statements Royal Mail plc 2014-15 Annual Report FinancialAnnual Statements and 2014-15 Strategic report Governance Financial statements Other information Strategic report Who we are 02 Financial and operating performance highlights 04 Chairman’s statement 05 Chief Executive Officer’s review 07 Market overview 12 Our business model 14 Our strategy 16 Key performance indicators 18 UK Parcels, International & Letters (UKPIL) 21 General Logistics Systems (GLS) 23 Financial review 24 Business risks 31 Corporate Responsibility 36 Governance Chairman’s introduction to Corporate Governance 41 Board of Directors 43 Statement of Corporate Governance 47 Chief Executive’s Committee 58 Directors’ Report 60 Directors’ remuneration report 64 Financial statements Consolidated income statement 77 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 78 Consolidated statement of cash flows 79 Consolidated balance sheet 80 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 81 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 82 Significant accounting policies 131 Group five year summary (unaudited) 140 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of 142 Information key the Group financial statements Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of 143 Royal Mail plc Case studies Royal Mail plc – parent Company financial statements 146 This icon is used throughout the document to indicate Other information reporting against a key performance indicator (KPI) Shareholder information 151 Forward-looking statements 152 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2014-15 Who we are Royal Mail is the UK’s pre-eminent delivery company, connecting people, customers and businesses. As the UK’s sole designated Universal Service Provider1, we are proud to deliver a ‘one-price-goes-anywhere’ service on a range of letters and parcels to more than 29 million addresses, across the UK, six-days-a-week.
    [Show full text]
  • Proud of Progress. Better Prepared for the Future. CONTENTS an POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014
    AN POST AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT AN POST AnnuAl Report 2014 Proud of Progress. Better Prepared for the Future. CONTENTS AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Mission, Vision and Values 4 Board of Directors and Corporate Information 6 Chairman’s Statement 8 Management 10 Chief Executive’s Review 14 Financial Review 24 Universal Service 26 Sustainability 30 Stamp Issues and Philatelic Publications 36 Index to the Financial Statements 39 1 IN 2014 AN POST INCREASED TURNOVER & REDUCED OPERATING COSTS. 2 AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 €811.7m €820.6m €823.2m €814.7m Turnover Operating Costs 3 OUR MISSION To provide world class postal, distribution and financial services with unrivalled local community access and global connections. OUR VISION Working together as a united team, our ambition is to outperform the competition, delivering a better quality service, more efficiently, to more customers by continuously adapting, innovating and implementing change. 4 AN POST ANNUAL REPORT 2014 OUR VALUES Quality Customer Service We deliver world class service quality by putting the customer first. Commercial Success We achieve commercial success to sustain and develop the business. Cost Competitiveness & Efficiency We run a cost competitive efficient Company. Respect & Personal Responsibility We respect each other and take personal responsibility. Respected Corporate Citizen We care for the environment and are engaged in the community. Innovation & Change We innovate, adapt and implement change successfully. 5 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE INFORMATION 1. 4. 8. 12. Christoph Jennifer William Peter Mueller Loftus Mooney Ormond 2. 5. 9. 13. Donal Patrick Ed William Connell Compton Murray Scally 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Efficiency Levels of Companies Operating in the European Postal Sector: a Nonparametric Approach
    Measuring the efficiency levels of companies operating in the European postal sector: a nonparametric approach 4 February 2020 Name: Robin Kamphorst Registration number: 960903419060 Supervisor: dr. ir. Frederic Ang Chair group: Business Economics (BEC) Study program: Master Management, Economics and Consumer Studies (MME) Course code: BEC-80436 Preface This thesis was written in the second year of the Master Management, Economics and Consumer Studies at Wageningen University, The Netherlands. The research was done under supervision of dr. ir. Frederic Ang, who is part of the Business Economics Group (BEC). This process started in September 2019 and finished in February 2020. The aim of this thesis was to analyze the efficiency levels of companies operating in the European postal sector, to indicate where improvements could be made. A comparison between the efficiency levels of private- and state-owned companies was of particular interest. The data was also plotted against time to investigate trends in the development of the efficiency levels. I would like to thank Frederic Ang for his supervision, as I appreciate the valuable input I got from our meetings. I would also like to thank my peers for their support during this process. Barneveld, February 2020 Robin Kamphorst DISCLAIMER: This report was written by a student of Wageningen University as part of the master programme under the supervision of the chair Business Economics. This is not an official publication of Wageningen University and Research, and the content herein does not represent any formal position or representation by Wageningen University and Research. This report cannot be used as a base for any claim, demand or cause of action and Wageningen University and Research is not responsible for any loss incurred based upon this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Universal Service Obligation: a Case of 29 Designated Operators in the European Countries
    Technological and Economic Development of Economy ISSN: 2029-4913 / eISSN: 2029-4921 2020 Volume 26 Issue 4: 785–807 https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12062 EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE OBLIGATION: A CASE OF 29 DESIGNATED OPERATORS IN THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Predrag RALEVIĆ 1, Momčilo DOBRODOLAC 2*, Libor ŠVADLENKA 3, Dragana ŠARAC 4, Dejan ĐURIĆ 5 1Technical College of Applied Sciences Uroševac, Leposavić, Serbia 2Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 3Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic 4Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia 5Higher School of Professional Business Studies, Novi Sad, Serbia Received 01 August 2019; accepted 25 January 2020 Abstract. The main aim of this paper is to perform efficiency and productivity analysis of Universal Service Obligation (USO) based on the Malmquist Productivity Indices (MPI) analysis. The study focuses on 29 Designated Operators (DOs) and two isolated periods, the years 2003 and 2017. There is a clear trend of workforce reduction (12%). Considering the postal services, the data confirm a general trend that the letter-post is in decline (30%) and the parcels are on the rise (52%). Consider- ing the financial results, both costs and revenues are increased; however, there is a higher increase of revenue (33.13%) compared to the cost (32.61%). Further, the results of implemented methodology are twofold. Firstly, a progress is determined at the average level of all observed DOs according to the efficiency and productivity indicators. Among other, the results indicate the increase of produc- tivity for both input MPI (3.5%) and output MPI (8%).
    [Show full text]
  • TNT Annual Report 2008
    Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Cautionary note with regard to Introduction and “forward-looking statements” financial highlights Some statements in this annual report are “forward-looking statements”. This is TNT’s annual report for the financial year ended 31 December 2008, By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty prepared in accordance with Dutch regulations. TNT delisted its American because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in Depositary Receipts from the New York Stock Exchange on 18 June 2007, the future. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown and its reporting obligations with the United States Securities and Exchange risks, uncertainties and other factors that are outside of TNT’s control and Commission terminated on 16 September 2007. TNT is therefore no longer impossible to predict and may cause actual results to differ materially from any required to file its annual repor t on Form 20-F. future results expressed or implied. These forward-looking statements are However, where TNT thinks it is helpful, certain information is retained for based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, analyses and projections comparative purposes. In this way TNT intends to provide its stakeholders with about the industries in which TNT operates and TNT management’s beliefs a clear overview of its financial year 2008. and assumptions about future events. Unless otherwise specified or the context so requires, “TNT”, the “company”, You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking the “group”, “it” and “its” refer to TNT N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Alessandra Fratini [email protected]
    WebConference on postal, delivery and ecommerce economics and policy 19 May 2020 Summary I. Role of the State/State aid: overview of measures & legal bases 1. Non-aid 2. Compensation of USO 3. Compensation of other SGEIs provided by postal operators or via postal network 4. Pension relief 5. State guarantees 6. Other measures II. Role of the State/State aid in COVID-19 times 1. Temporary Framework: liquidity measures, recapitalisation? 2. FDI screening? 2 Measures&legal bases 1/6 1 Measures not constituting State aid Poste Italiane: remuneration of current account deposited with Treasury (2008, 2019: no advantage); remuneration for distribution of postal saving products (2006: MEIP; 2008: Altmark 4) Royal Mail: 3 loans measures (2009: MEIP) bpost: 2 capital injections (2003, 2012: MEIP) Correos: 3 capital injections (2018: MEIP) Post Danmark: capital injection by PostNord; VAT exemption under Article 132(1)(a) of VAT Directive (2018: not imputable to State) 3 Measures&legal bases 2/6 2 Compensation of USO - Article 106(2) TFUE 1. Poczta Polska: 2006, 2009, 2015 (compensation fund) 2. ELTA: 2003, 2012, 2014 (compensation fund withdrawn) 3. Poste Italiane: 2002, 2008, 2012, 2015 4. bpost: 2003, 2015 5. Correos: 2018, 2020 6. Czech Post: 2018 7. Post Danmark: 2018 4 Measures&legal bases 3/6 Compensation of other SGEIs - Article 106(2) TFUE 3 AnPost: 2002 (counter network) Posten AB: 2002 (basic cashier services) Post Office Ltd: 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2018 (post offices network and over-the-counter access to a set of services) Poste
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20 and Financial Statements Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-20 Royal Mail plc 1 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019–20 CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Report Strategic 02 Overview 159 Independent auditor’s report 04 Who we are 166 Consolidated income statement 06 Financial and operational highlights 2019-20 167 Consolidated statement 15 Interim Executive Chair’s statement of comprehensive income 18 Delivering throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 168 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Business review 2019-20 170 Consolidated statement of changes in equity Corporate Governance Corporate 26 Market overview 171 Consolidated statement of cash flows 28 Business model 173 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Measuring our performance 233 Significant accounting policies 32 Financial review 247 Royal Mail plc – Parent Company financial statements 62 Principal risks and uncertainties 73 Viability statement Shareholder Information Financial Statements 74 Corporate responsibility 250 Group five year summary (unaudited) 86 Non-financial information statement 252 Shareholder information 253 Forward-looking statements Corporate Governance 88 Chair’s introduction 90 Group Board of Directors 92 Executive Board – Royal Mail Information Shareholder 94 Governance structure 96 Board in action 100 Board composition and diversity 101 Reporting against the 2018 Corporate Governance Code 102 Board induction programme 103 Annual evaluation of Board performance and effectiveness 104 Engaging with our stakeholders 110 The Board’s considerations to our stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic 112 Employee engagement 114 Nomination Committee 117 Audit and Risk Committee 126 Corporate Responsibility Committee 128 Directors’ Remuneration Report 154 Directors’ Report 157 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 2 Strategic Report OVERVIEW ROYAL MAIL (UKPIL) Our UK business has faced significant challenges for some years.
    [Show full text]
  • An Post Terms and Conditions for Bulk Mail Universal
    AN POST TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR BULK MAIL UNIVERSAL SERVICES AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 17 November 2014 - 1 - Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 PART 1 - Terms and Conditions applicable to all Bulk Mail Universal Services ........ 7 Section A - Preliminary .............................................................................................. 7 A.1 Commencement ................................................................................... 7 A.2 Definitions ............................................................................................. 7 A.3 An Post not a “Common Carrier” .......................................................... 7 A.4 An Post services offered subject to their availability ............................. 7 A.5 Confidentiality and Inviolability of Postal Packets ................................. 7 A.6 Applicable Law ..................................................................................... 8 Section B – Preparing your mail for posting ............................................................... 9 B.1 Information on size and weight restrictions ........................................... 9 B.2 Packing ............................................................................................... 10 B.3 Postal Addressing ............................................................................... 11 B.4 Return Postal Address .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research for Tran Committee
    STUDY Requested by the TRAN committee Postal services in the EU Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 629.201 - November 2019 EN RESEARCH FOR TRAN COMMITTEE Postal services in the EU Abstract This study aims at providing the European Parliament’s TRAN Committee with an overview of the EU postal services sector, including recent developments, and recommendations for EU policy-makers on how to further stimulate growth and competitiveness of the sector. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Transport and Tourism. AUTHORS Copenhagen Economics: Henrik BALLEBYE OKHOLM, Martina FACINO, Mindaugas CERPICKIS, Martha LAHANN, Bruno BASALISCO Research manager: Esteban COITO GONZALEZ, Balázs MELLÁR Project and publication assistance: Adrienn BORKA Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to updates on our work for the TRAN Committee please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in November 2019 © European Union, 2019 This document is available on the internet in summary with option to download the full text at: http://bit.ly/2rupi0O This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2019)629201 Further information on research for TRAN by the Policy Department is available at: https://research4committees.blog/tran/ Follow us on Twitter: @PolicyTRAN Please use the following reference to cite this study: Copenhagen Economics 2019, Research for TRAN Committee – Postal Services in the EU, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels Please use the following reference for in-text citations: Copenhagen Economics (2019) DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 207 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.11.2015 SWD(2015) 207 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Postal Services Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC and Directive 2008/6/EC) {COM(2015) 568 final} EN EN Contents 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 1.1. Postal Services in the Digital Age ..................................................................... 4 1.2. The Postal Services Directive ............................................................................ 5 1.3. Purpose and Scope of the Fifth Application Report and Staff Working Document .......................................................................................................... 6 2. APPLICATION OF THE POSTAL SERVICES DIRECTIVE 2008/6/EC ............... 8 2.1. Transposition and Application of Directive 2008/6/EC .................................... 8 2.2. Regulation of Postal Services ............................................................................ 8 2.2.1. National Regulatory Authorities .......................................................... 8 2.2.2. Authorisation and Licensing Regimes ............................................... 10 2.3. The Universal Service: Basic Postal Services for All ..................................... 13 2.3.1. Designation of Universal Service Provider(s) ................................... 13 2.3.2. Services
    [Show full text]
  • Kompletní Ceník Služeb
    Příloha č. 1 Všeobecných obchodních podmínek Zásilkovna s.r.o. Kompletní ceník služeb KOMPLETNÍ CENÍK DORUČENÍ NA VÝDEJNÍ MÍSTA ZÁSILKOVNY ............................................................................................................... 3 STANDARDNÍ ZÁSILKY ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 NADROZMĚRNÉ ZÁSILKY ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 DORUČENÍ DO ČR A ZAHRANIČÍ .................................................................................................................................. 4 CZ ZÁSILKOVNA VEČERNÍ DORUČENÍ NA ADRESU ........................................................................................................................ 4 CZ ZÁSILKOVNA DOMŮ HD* ................................................................................................................................................. 4 CZ NADLIMITNÍ ZÁSILKY ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 SK DORUČENÍ NA ADRESU* .................................................................................................................................................. 4 SK SLOVENSKÁ POŠTA HD....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List with Shipping-Information Per Country and Delivery Service
    Storage period (working days) for pick- up after unsuccessful delivery Shipment link from Austrian Post Country Delivery service Delivery attempts attempt(s) Austria Österr. Post AG 2 4 days from Austrian Post Austria Preferred post office 1 4 days from Austrian Post Austria Preferred pick up station 1 4 days from Austrian Post Austria EMS quick shipping Mo - Fr 7am – 1pm 1 4 days from Austrian Post Germany DHL Parcel 1 4 days from Austrian Post Germany Packstations: DHL Paketversand 1 4 days from Austrian Post Switzerland Swiss Post 1 n.a. from Austrian Post Italy SDA 2 4 days from Austrian Post Belgium bpost NV/SA 1 4 days from Austrian Post Bulgaria Express one 2 n.a. from Austrian Post Croatia Overseas Express 2 4 days from Austrian Post Cyprus Cyprus Post 1 4 days from Austrian Post Czech Republic PPL CZ 1 4 days from Austrian Post No home delivery, pick up from local 4 days from Austrian Post Denmark Bring DK BRING parcel shop/BRING partner shop Estonia Eesti Post 1 4 days from Austrian Post No home delivery, pick up from local 4 days from Austrian Post Finland Itella Posti Oy post office branch France LA POSTE - Colissimo 1 4 days from Austrian Post Greece Hellenic Posts-ELTA 1 4 days from Austrian Post Hungary Express one 2 n.a. from Austrian Post Ireland An Post 1 4 days from Austrian Post Latvia Latvijas Pasts 1 4 days from Austrian Post Liechtenstein Post Liechtenstein 1 4 days from Austrian Post Lithuania Lietuvos pastas 1 4 days from Austrian Post Luxembourg Enterprise des Postes &Telecommunications 1 4 days from Austrian Post Malta MaltaPost p.l.c.
    [Show full text]