DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare  

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitteilungen Der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare   MITTEILUNGEN DER VEREINIGUNG ÖSTERREICHISCHER BIBLIOTHEKARINNEN & BIBLIOTHEKARE 72 (2019) 2 Schwerpunktthema „Open Science“ ISSN 1022-2588 Redaktionsschluss für Heft 1 (2020): 28. Februar 2020 IMPRESSUM Medieninhaber, Hersteller und Herausgeber: Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare Geschäftssitz: Universitätsbibliothek Graz, Universitätsplatz 3a, A-8010 Graz Telefon: +43 (0)316 380 – 1419 E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Website: http://www.univie.ac.at/voeb Editorial Board: Monika Bargmann, Bruno Bauer, Patrick Danowski, Andreas Ferus, Veronika Gründhammer, Christian Kaier, Michael Katzmayr, Peter Klien, Klaus Niedermair, Otto Oberhauser, Josef Pauser und Bernhard Schubert Redaktion (Schwerpunktthema): Susanne Blumesberger, Andreas Ferus, Veronika Gründhammer, Barbara Sánchez Solis E-Mail der Redaktion (interim.): [email protected] Open Access verfügbar unter: https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/voebm Indexiert/indexed in: BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), e-lis (e-prints in library and information science), DABI Datenbank Deutsches Bibliothekswesen, EBSCO® Library & Information Science Source, EBSCO® Library, Information Sci- ence & Technology Abstracts (LISTA), ProQuest® Library Science, Elsevier® Scopus, European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Druck: ÖH-Servicecenter, Schubertstraße 6a, A-8010 Graz E-Mail: [email protected] Preise: Jahresabonnement der Mitteilungen ab 2007: EUR 50,–; Einzelheft: EUR 15,– Anzeigenpreise: 1/1 Seite: EUR 360,– (Teile entsprechend) Beilage pro 1.000 Stück bzw. Gesamtauflage: pro Heft: EUR 360,– Alle in den „Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare“ veröffentlichten Texte stellen die Meinung der Verfasser_innen und nicht unbedingt die der Redaktion dar. Cover-Photo „Smoke 1432“ © by Clive Tooth, 2006 ——————————— I N H A L T ——————————— Editorial Susanne Blumesberger, Andreas Ferus, Veronika Gründhammer und Barbara Sánchez Solis: Schwerpunktthema „Open Science“ ............ 224 Aus der VÖB Werner Schlacher: Aus Präsidium und Vorstand ................................. 232 Werner Schlacher: Einladung zur außerordentlichen Generalversammlung der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare .......................................... 236 Österreichische Nationalbibliothek: In Memoriam Werner Rotter (1954–2019) ................................. 237 Open Science Daniel Spichtinger: Open Science: vom Randthema zum Mainstream? ... 238 Ina Blümel, Bastian Drees, Christian Hauschke, Lambert Heller und Marco Tullney: Open Science und die Bibliothek – Aktionsfelder und Berufsbild ...................................................... 243 Robin Rice: Supporting Research Data Management and Open Science in Academic Libraries: a Data Librarian’s View ...... 263 Alina Rezniczek, Susanne Blumesberger, Monika Bargmann, Igor Eberhard und Christian Kaier: Der Zertifikatskurs „Data Librarian“ und seine erstmalige Durchführung ........................................................... 274 Michela Vignoli and Jan Rörden: Why We Need Open Science Communication Experts ............................................................ 284 Gregor Neuböck: Crowdsourcing an der Oberösterreichischen Landesbibliothek ....................................................................... 297 Lucia Malfent und Benjamin Missbach: Wie Crowdsourcing neue Forschungsansätze liefert. „Reden Sie mit!“ – Ein Innovations- projekt der Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft ................................ 310 Daniel Dörler and Florian Heigl: Citizen Science in Austria .................... 317 Tiberius Ignat, Darlene Cavalier and Caroline Nickerson: Citizen Science and Libraries: Waltzing towards a collaboration ......................... 328 Katja Mayer: Offene Wissenschaft braucht offene Infrastrukturen ...... 337 Mitteilungen der VÖB 72 (2019) Nr. 2: Open Science 219 Vanessa Hannesschläger: Das Open Science Network Austria (OANA) und seine Arbeitsgruppe „Rechtliche Aspekte von Open Science“ ... 356 Tomasz Miksa, Barbara Sánchez Solis, Andreas Rauber, Paolo Budroni and Raman Ganguly: RDA Austria – Removing Barriers in Data Sharing .. 365 Olivia Kaiser und Gerda McNeill: OpenAIRE für Repository ManagerInnen – wie Repository ManagerInnen Open Science unterstützen können ................................................................. 373 Ivana Ilijašić Veršić and Julian Ausserhofer: Social Sciences, Humanities and their interoperability with the European Open Science Cloud: What is SSHOC? ............................................................ 383 Klaus Illmayer: Openness in Forschungsprojekten: PARTHENOS Standardization Survival Kit (SSK) ............................................. 392 Katharina Rieck: The FWF’s Open Access Policy over the last 15 Years – Developments and Outlook ................................. 408 Marie Timmermann: A collective challenge: Open Science from the perspective of Science Europe .................................................... 424 Johannes Stigler und Helmut W. Klug: KONDE – Ein Netzwerk bringt Forschungs- und GLAM-Institutionen zusammen. Ein Projektbericht ...................................................................... 431 Diana Wernisch, Silvia Ziemkendorf und Andreas Ferus: Sechs Fragen zu Open Access an ... TU Wien Academic Press ............................... 440 Anna Bellotto and Janos Bekesi: Enriching Metadata for a University Repository by Modelling and Infrastructure: A New Vocabulary Server for Phaidra ..................................................................... 446 Peter Kraker, Maxi Schramm und Christopher Kittel: Open Knowledge Maps: Visuelle Literatursuche basierend auf den Prinzipien von Open Science ............................................................................ 460 Paloma Marín-Arraiza: ORCID in the Open Science scenario: opportunities for academic libraries ........................................... 478 Harald Oberhofer, Gerhard Schwarz und Michael Strassnig: Registerforschung: Verwaltungs- und Statistikdaten für die Wissenschaft ............................................................................ 494 Susanne Blumesberger und Barbara Levc: „Ich hantle mich oft von einer Information zur nächsten“. Open Data – Open Science – offen für alle oder gibt es doch noch Barrieren? .......................... 505 Igor Eberhard: Forschen zwischen Leerstellen und Negativräumen. Schwierigkeiten und Unmöglichkeiten von Open Science bei ethnographischem und sozialwissenschaftlichem Forschen ......... 516 Martina Trognitz: Das Fellow-Programm Freies Wissen: Open Science selbst probiert .......................................................................... 524 220 Mitteilungen der VÖB 72 (2019) Nr. 2: Open Science Edeltraud Aspöck: Moving towards an Open Archaeology: projects, opportunities and challenges ....................................... 538 Essays Jürgen Babendreier: Die Textur der Diaspora – Zerstreutes Sammeln, Gesammeltes zerstreuen ............................................................ 555 Berichte Elisabeth Stadler und Markus Stumpf: IFLA Special Interest Group (SIG) on Library Publishing. 2019 Midterm Meeting (Dublin, 28. Februar–1. März 2019) ........ 572 Markus Stumpf, Regina Zodl, Olivia Kaiser und Johannes Koll: Übergabe an die Erben der Buchhandlung „Brüder Suschitzky“. Gemeinsame Restitution der Universitätsbibliotheken der Universität Wien und der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (Wien, 30. April 2019) .............................................................. 578 Stefan Heinrich: „Wer soll das bezahlen?“ Kosten- und Betriebs- modelle für nachhaltige Forschungsinfrastrukturen und FDM-Services (Trier, 12.–13. Juni 2019) .................................... 585 Rezensionen Achim Bonte: Petra Hauke (Hg.): Öffentliche Bibliothek 2030. Herausforderungen – Konzepte – Visionen usw. Bock + Herchen Verlag: Bad Honnef 2019 .................................. 596 Mitteilungen der VÖB 72 (2019) Nr. 2: Open Science 221 AUTOR_INNENRICHTLINIEN DER MITTEILUNGEN DER VEREINIGUNG ÖSTERREICHISCHER BIBLIOTHEKARINNEN UND BIBLIOTHEKARE Voraussetzungen für die Veröffentlichung Neben dem Fachbeitrag, der einen substantiellen Beitrag zu einem Thema aus dem Bibliotheks-, Informations- oder Dokumentationswesen leisten soll, können unter anderem folgende Artikeltypen veröffentlicht werden: Editorial, Interview, Report, Bericht, Personalia, Rezension, Veranstal- tungshinweis oder sonstige Mitteilung. Die eingereichten Manuskripte oder wesentliche Teile daraus dürfen nicht bereits an anderer Stelle ver- öffentlicht oder zur Veröffentlichung eingereicht worden sein. Die Präsen- tation der Inhalte als Kurzfassung auf einem Kongress gilt dabei nicht als Vorveröffentlichung. Autor_innenschaft und Urheberrecht Alle Autorinnen und Autoren versichern, dass sie einen substanziellen Bei- trag zum Artikel erbracht haben und mit Form und Inhalt des Manuskriptes einverstanden sind. Mit der Einreichung des Manuskriptes und des sonstigen Materials bestätigt die Autorin oder der Autor, dass sie/er über die urhe- berrechtlichen Nutzungsrechte am Werk und den mitgelieferten Text- und Bildvorlagen verfügt. Die Autorin oder der Autor räumt im Fall der Veröffent- lichung das Recht auf zeitlich unbegrenzte Einspeicherung in Datenbanken, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe des Beitrages in elektronischer als auch ge- druckter Form ein. Für alle veröffentlichten
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Educational Practices and Resources
    Open Educational Practices and Resources OLCOS Roadmap 2012 Edited by Guntram Geser Salzburg Research EduMedia Group Project information and imprint Project information and imprint Open e-Learning Content Observatory Services (OLCOS) OLCOS is a Transversal Action funded by the European Commission under the eLearning Programme. Duration: January 2006 – December 2007 Website: www.olcos.org Project partners European Centre for Media Competence, Germany European Distance and E-Learning Network, Hungary FernUniversitaet in Hagen, Germany Mediamaisteri Group, Finland Open University of Catalonia, Spain Salzburg Research, Austria Project coordinator Salzburg Research / EduMedia Group Veronika Hornung-Prähauser Jakob Haringer Straße 5/III, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria [email protected] Tel. 0043-662-2288-405 OLCOS roadmap editor Guntram Geser, Salzburg Research / EduMedia Group, Austria Contributors to the OLCOS roadmap FernUniversitaet in Hagen: Peter Baumgartner and Viola Naust Open University of Catalonia: Agustí Canals, Núria Ferran, Julià Minguillón and Mireia Pascual Mediamaisteri Group: Mats Rajalakso and Timo Väliharju Salzburg Research: Wernher Behrendt, Andreas Gruber, Veronika Hornung-Prähauser and Sebastian Schaffert Graphics & layout Jesper Visser, Salzburg Research 3 Project information and imprint Images Based on copyright-free photographs from www.imageafter.com Print version ISBN 3-902448-08-3 Printed in Austria January 2007 Online A digital version of this report can be freely downloaded from www.olcos.org Copyright This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 2.5 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ Disclaimer This publication was produced by the OLCOS Project with the financial support of the European Commission. The content of this report is the sole responsibility of OLCOS and its project partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Project News and Events
    Issue 6 July 2010 – January 2011 ■ Editorial Project News ■ Project no. 212879 ■ EU News and Events ■ Useful Links and Documents This e-newsletter can be downloaded at the following address: http://www.euroris-net.eu/ ■ Editorial Research Infrastructures are at the ‘heart” of European Research Area, according to the FP7 Interim Evaluation report, published in October 2010. During the last semester, there were changes in Chairs of both ESFRI and e-IRG, whereas, both an e-IRG blue paper (requested by ESFRI) and ESFRI TWG documents have been produced, to support decision making procedures, which will significantly move RIs forward, despite the worldwide economic crisis. The presentations and discussion held during the International Conference on RIs in Rome (http://www.euroris-net.eu/News/project_news) highlight - among other issues - the socio-economic benefits stemming from Research Infrastructures, built with a global perspective and requiring an international cooperation setting, fully aligned with the European Research and Innovation Strategy. In the current issue, you can read information on the outcomes of important RI events in which EuroRIs- Net actively participated throughout this period, with dynamic contribution both in the dissemination of the benefits of RI programme to research communities, and to the broader dialogue with all FP7 thematic areas covered within the Research Infrastructures programme. ■ Project News and Events 1. International Conference on Research Infrastructures, 30th September 2010, Rome, Italy An International Conference on Research Infrastructures was organized by APRE in collaboration with the European Commission, the Italian Ministry of Research, the National Research Council and the National Institute of Astrophysics, within the framework of the EuroRIs-Net project.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Publishing
    Open Access The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Suber, Peter. 2012. Open access. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. [Updates and Supplements: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/hoap/ Open_Access_(the_book)] Published Version http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10752204 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA OPEN ACCESS The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series Information and the Modern Corporation, James Cortada Intellectual Property Strategy, John Palfrey Open Access, Peter Suber OPEN ACCESS PETER SUBER TheMIT Press | Cambridge, Massachusetts | London, England © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology This work is licensed under the Creative Commons licenses noted below. To view a copy of these licenses, visit creativecommons.org. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. This book incorporates certain materials previously published under a CC-BY license and copyright in those underlying materials is owned by SPARC. Those materials remain under the CC-BY license. Effective June 15, 2013, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequalities in Open Source Software Development: Analysis of Contributor’S Commits in Apache Software Foundation Projects
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Inequalities in Open Source Software Development: Analysis of Contributor’s Commits in Apache Software Foundation Projects Tadeusz Chełkowski1☯, Peter Gloor2☯*, Dariusz Jemielniak3☯ 1 Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland, 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Cognitive Intelligence, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 3 Kozminski University, New Research on Digital Societies (NeRDS) group, Warsaw, Poland ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] a11111 Abstract While researchers are becoming increasingly interested in studying OSS phenomenon, there is still a small number of studies analyzing larger samples of projects investigating the structure of activities among OSS developers. The significant amount of information that OPEN ACCESS has been gathered in the publicly available open-source software repositories and mailing- list archives offers an opportunity to analyze projects structures and participant involve- Citation: Chełkowski T, Gloor P, Jemielniak D (2016) Inequalities in Open Source Software Development: ment. In this article, using on commits data from 263 Apache projects repositories (nearly Analysis of Contributor’s Commits in Apache all), we show that although OSS development is often described as collaborative, but it in Software Foundation Projects. PLoS ONE 11(4): fact predominantly relies on radically solitary input and individual, non-collaborative contri- e0152976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152976 butions. We also show, in the first published study of this magnitude, that the engagement Editor: Christophe Antoniewski, CNRS UMR7622 & of contributors is based on a power-law distribution. University Paris 6 Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, FRANCE Received: December 15, 2015 Accepted: March 22, 2016 Published: April 20, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Chełkowski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Uso De Open Journal System En Revistas Científicas Peruanas Using Open Journal Systems in Peruvian Scientific Journals
    Cultura, 2018, 32, 353-366 Uso(enero de Open- diciembre) Journal System en revistas científicashttps://doi.org/10.24265/cultura.2018.v32.16 peruanas ISSN (Impreso): 1817-0285 ISSN (Digital): 2224-3585 Uso de Open Journal System en revistas científicas peruanas Using Open Journal Systems in Peruvian scientific journals Victoria Yance-Yupari* Escuela Profesional de Psicología, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Perú Recibido: 2 de setiembre de 2018 Aceptado: 16 de octubre de 2018 Resumen El uso del Open Journal Systems en el Perú se ha incrementado en la difusión y visibilidad de revistas científicas de acceso abierto. Conocer e indagar el uso del software en las revistas publicadas por universidades peruanas es necesario para identificar la vigencia y actividad en la que se encuentran. Este, es un estudio exploratorio que tiene una muestra conformada por 54 universidades peruanas, en la que se encontró 324 títulos, que evidenció la totalidad de revistas en acceso abierto; 71% son publicadas por universidades particulares; 27 títulos no tiene ninguna publicación en la plataforma; la versión 2.0 es utilizada por el 73%; la versión 3.0 la utilizan solo 74 revistas. Palabras clave: Open Journal System, OJS, revistas científicas, Perú. Abstract The use of Open Journal Systems in Peru is recent, and its dissemination and visibility in scientific journals are increasing. Knowing and investigating the use of the software in journals published by Peruvian universities are necessary to identify validity and activity in which they are. In the exploratory
    [Show full text]
  • Social Annotation Enabling Collaboration for Open Learning
    Social Annotation Enabling Collaboration for Open Learning Jeremiah H. Kalir University of Colorado Denver Email: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-2302-7989 Twitter: @remikalir 1 Social annotation enabling collaboration for open learning Jeremiah H. Kalir• Learning Design & Technology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States Abstract Collaboration is a conceptually ambiguous aspect of open education. Given inconsistent discussion about collaboration in the open education literature, this article suggests collaboration be defined and studied as a distinct open educational practice. A theoretical stance from the discipline of computer-supported collaborative learning helps conceptualize collaboration as processes of intersubjective meaning-making. Social annotation is then presented as a genre of learning technology that can productively enable group collaboration and shared meaning- making. After introducing an open learning project utilizing social annotation for group dialogue, analysis of interview and annotation data details how social annotation enabled three group-level epistemic expressions delineating collaboration as intersubjective meaning-making and as an open educational practice. A summative discussion considers how the social life of documents encourages collaboration, why attention to epistemic expression is a productive means of articulating open learning, and how to extend the study of collaboration as an open educational practice. Keywords: annotation; collaboration; computer-supported
    [Show full text]
  • Riviste Italiane Digitali E Digitalizzate Ad Accesso Libero Un Contributo Per L’Emeroteca Digitale Nazionale
    Biblioteca nazionale centrale Roma RIDI Riviste italiane digitali e digitalizzate ad accesso libero Un contributo per l’emeroteca digitale nazionale a cura di Giulio Palanga Work in progress 10 dicembre 2019-27 aprile 2021 PRINCIPALI PIATTAFORME INTERNAZIONALI Annex http://www.annexpublishers.com/ Annex Publishers è stato istituito con l'obiettivo di diffondere le informazioni tra la comunità scientifica. E’ stato inserito nella Lista di Beall degli editori predatori. (82) Dove medical press https://www.dovepress.com/browse_journals.php Editore accademico di riviste scientifiche e mediche, con uffici a Manchester, Londra, Princeton, New Jersey e Auckland. A settembre 2017, Dove Medical Press è stata acquisita da Taylor e Francis Group (92) Elsevier Open Access Journals https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science/open-access/open-access- journals Elsevier ha stipulato un accordo con il Consorzio della CRUI, Conferenza dei rettori delle Università italiane, per incentivare gli autori italiani FreeMedical Journals http://www.freemedicaljournals.com/ Riviste mediche (5088) Highwire http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/allsites.dtl Nato dall'Università di Stanford, HighWire è stato fondato all'inizio di Internet (421) Open edition https://journals.openedition.org/ Già: Revue.org. Infrastruttura di ricerca pubblica francese per l’accesso alle piattaforme: OpenEdition Journals, OpenEdition Books, Calenda e Hypothèses 529 PLOS https://www.plos.org/ Public Library of Science è un progetto editoriale per pubblicazioni scientifiche. Cura la pubblicazione di sette riviste, tutte caratterizzate da revisione paritaria e contenuto aperto. L'idea del progetto nacque nel 2000 in seguito alla pubblicazione online di una lettera aperta a firma di Harold Varmus, premio Nobel per la medicina ed ex direttore del National Institutes of Health, Patrick Brown, biochimico presso l'Università di Stanford, e Michael Eisen, biologo ricercatore presso l'Università della California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access and Open Science in Europe and Switzerland: Things Are Moving
    Hauptbibliothek Open Access and Open Science in Europe and Switzerland: things are moving Swiss Librarians for Evidence Based Medicine Meet and Greet for Swiss Biomedical Librarians Bern Prof. Dr. Christian Fuhrer, Hauptbibliothek (Main Library) , Head Open Access, University of Zurich [email protected] www.oai.uzh.ch 08.09.2016 OA and OS in Europe and Switzerland: things are moving, Christian Fuhrer Seite 1 Hauptbibliothek Abstract Open Access, the free access to scientific research results, has been a topic for various stakeholders for more than ten years. Yet most scientific publications are still not freely accessible and the traditional licence-based publishing systems continues to prevail. But recently, science politicians of various countries and the European Union have picked up the topic of Open Access, placed it into the context of Open Science, and now call for fundamental changes in the way resarch results should be incentivized, evaluated, distributed, published and reused. The Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science, led by the Dutch EU Council Presidency, is a hallmark of this new political drive, which has the potential to deeply change the scholarly publishing system. Meanwhile in Switzerland, swissuniversities, the rector's assembly of all Swiss Higher Education Institutions, has taken the lead in elaborating a Swiss national Open Access strategy, following a request by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation. An important element of this strategy will be to bring together key stakeholders in Switzerland and to follow the European trends. This talk will summarize these recent proceedings in Europe and Switzerland and show which road Open Access is likely to follow in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Journal Archiving: Changing Landscape
    12/10/2014 e-Journal Archiving: Changing Landscape Lars Bjørnshauge, Director European Library Relations, SPARC Europe & Managing Director, DOAJ Mark Jordan, Head of Library Systems, Simon Fraser University Library & Public Knowledge Project (PKP) Bernie Reilly, President, Center for Research Libraries Oya Y. Rieger, Associate University Librarian Digital Scholarship & Preservation Services Cornell University Library CNI Fall 2014 Membership Meeting December 8, 2014 1 12/10/2014 Life of eJournals • Subscription cancellations and modifications • Moving from hybrid subscription to digital only • Changes in publishers’ business or service models digital preservation aims to ensure the usability, authenticity, discoverability, and accessibility of content 2 12/10/2014 • How do we factor in preservation status in our selection & collection building efforts? • How much do we know about Portico, Lockss, Clockss, etc. and our roles in the success of these operation? • What does “perpetual access” mean? • 2CUL Study, Spring 2011 –Only 13%-26% of e-journal titles preserved by LOCKSS or Portico • Keepers Registry Study, Fall 2012 –Only 23-27% of e-journals with ISSNs preserved by any of 7 preservation agencies 3 12/10/2014 Scale - Estimate • 200,000 e-serial titles – 121,000 titles in Cornell • 113,000 ISSNs assigned – 22,000 preserved • 13% preserved in Lockss or Portico 4 12/10/2014 Part 2: Mellon-Funded Project Objectives • Establish preservation priorities • Contact aggregators and publishers • Promote: – models for distributed action – model
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Measuring, Rating, Supporting, and Strengthening
    Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas ISSN: 1068-2341 [email protected] Arizona State University Estados Unidos Carvalho Neto, Silvio; Willinsky, John; Alperin, Juan Pablo Measuring, Rating, Supporting, and Strengthening Open Access Scholarly Publishing in Brazil Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, vol. 24, 2016, pp. 1-25 Arizona State University Arizona, Estados Unidos Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=275043450033 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative education policy analysis archives A peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal Arizona State University Volume 24 Number 54 May 19, 2016 ISSN 1068-2341 Measuring, Rating, Supporting, and Strengthening Open Access Scholarly Publishing in Brazil Silvio Carvalho Neto Centro Universitário Municipal de Franca Brazil & John Willinsky Stanford University United States & Juan Pablo Alperin Simon Fraser University Canada Citation: Carvalho Neto, S., Willinsky, J. & Alperin, J. P. (2016). Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening open access scholarly publishing in Brazil. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(54). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2391 Abstract: This study assesses the extent and nature of open access scholarly publishing in Brazil, one of the world’s leaders in providing universal access to its research and scholarship. It utilizes Brazil’s Qualis journal evaluation system, along with other relevant data bases to address the association between scholarly quality and open access in the Brazilian context.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Production: a Form of Collective Intelligence.” in Hand- Book of Collective Intelligence, Edited by Thomas Malone and Michael Bernstein
    THIS IS A PRE-PRINT VERSION OF PUBLISHED BOOK CHAPTER.THE FINAL VERSION AND THE REFERENCE TO USE WHEN CITING THIS WORK IS: Benkler, Yochai, Aaron Shaw, and Benjamin Mako Hill. (2015) “Peer Production: A Form of Collective Intelligence.” In Hand- book of Collective Intelligence, edited by Thomas Malone and Michael Bernstein. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Peer Production: A Form of Collective Intelligence Yochai Benkler ([email protected]) HARVARD UNIVERSITY Aaron Shaw ([email protected]) NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Benjamin Mako Hill ([email protected]) UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION Wikipedia has mobilized a collective of millions to produce an enormous, high quality, encyclopedia without traditional forms of hierarchical organiza- tion or financial incentives. More than any other twenty-first century collab- orative endeavor, Wikipedia has attracted the attention of scholars in the so- cial sciences and law both as an example of what collective intelligence makes possible and as an empirical puzzle. Conventional thinking suggests that ef- fective and successful organizations succeed through hierarchical control and management, but Wikipedia seems to organize collectively without either. Legal and economic common sense dictates that compensation and contracts are necessary for individuals to share the valuable products of their work, yet Wikipedia elicits millions of contributions without payment or owner- ship. Intuition suggests that hobbyists, volunteers, and rag-tag groups will not Parts of this chapter build upon work published in: Y. Benkler, Peer. “Production and Cooperation” forthcoming in J. M. Bauer & M. Latzer (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet, Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar. 1 2 be able to create information goods of sufficient quality to undermine pro- fessional production, but contributors to Wikipedia have done exactly this.
    [Show full text]
  • Plos Progress Update 2014/2015 from the Chairman and Ceo
    PLOS PROGRESS UPDATE 2014/2015 FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO PLOS is dedicated to the transformation of research communication through collaboration, transparency, speed and access. Since its founding, PLOS has demonstrated the viability of high quality, Open Access publishing; launched the ground- breaking PLOS ONE, a home for all sound science selected for its rigor, not its “significance”; developed the first Article- Level Metrics (ALMs) to demonstrate the value of research beyond the perceived status of a journal title; and extended the impact of research after its publication with the PLOS data policy, ALMs and liberal Open Access licensing. But challenges remain. Scientific communication is far from its ideal state. There is still inconsistent access, and research is oered at a snapshot in time, instead of as an evolving contribution whose reliability and significance are continually evaluated through its lifetime. The current state demands that PLOS continue to establish new standards and expectations for scholarly communication. These include a faster and more ecient publication experience, more transparent peer review, assessment though the lifetime of a work, better recognition of the range of contributions made by collaborators and placing researchers and their communities back at the center of scientific communication. To these ends, PLOS is developing ApertaTM, a system that will facilitate and advance the submission and peer review process for authors, editors and reviewers. PLOS is also creating richer and more inclusive forums, such as PLOS Paleontology and PLOS Ecology Communities and the PLOS Science Wednesday redditscience Ask Me Anything. Progress is being made on early posting of manuscripts at PLOS.
    [Show full text]