DOCSLIB.ORG

SRH Model Applications and Progress Report on Bank Erosion and Turbidity Current Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SRH Model Applications and Progress Report on Bank Erosion and Turbidity Current Models Technical Report No. SRH-2010-22 SRH Model Applications and Progress Report on Bank Erosion and Turbidity Current Models Conducted under Appendix No. 8 to the Agreement between American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) for Technical Assistance and Cooperation for Water Resources U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado February 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover Figure: Looking upstream at the Chi-Chi Weir (photo taken in November, 2009) SRH Model Applications and Progress Report on Bank Erosion and Turbidity Current Models Conducted under Appendix No. 8 to the Agreement between American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) for Technical Assistance and Cooperation for Water Resources Report Prepared by: Yong G. Lai, Ph.D., Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Blair P. Greimann, P.E., Ph.D., Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado Peer Review Certification: This document has been peer reviewed per guidelines established by the Technical Service Center and is believed to be in accordance with the service agreement and standards of the profession. Questions concerning this report should be addressed to Timothy Randle, Group Manager of the Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) at 303-445-2557. PREPARED BY: _____________________________________ DATE:________________ Yong Lai, Ph.D. Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) _____________________________________ DATE:________________ Blair Greimann, Ph.D., P.E. Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) PEER REVIEWED BY: _____________________________________ DATE:________________ Jennifer Bountry, M.S., P.E. Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) Table of Contents Page Executive Summary .............................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 6 2 SRH-1D Modeling Study of Tachia River .............................................. 8 2.1 Background ........................................................................................... 8 2.2 Modeling Overview .............................................................................. 8 2.3 Input data .............................................................................................. 9 2.3.1 Model Parameters .......................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Upstream Boundary Conditions .................................................. 10 2.3.3 Downstream Boundary Conditions ............................................. 13 2.3.4 Internal Boundary Conditions ..................................................... 13 2.3.5 Lateral Inflows ............................................................................ 14 2.3.6 Channel Geometry and Flow Characteristics .............................. 15 2.3.7 Sediment Model Parameters ........................................................ 18 2.3.8 Upstream Sediment Boundary Conditions .................................. 18 2.3.9 Lateral Sediment Discharge ........................................................ 18 2.3.10 Sediment Bed Material ............................................................ 18 2.3.11 Water Temperature .................................................................. 20 2.3.12 Erosion and Deposition Limits ................................................ 20 2.3.13 Sediment Transport Parameters ............................................... 23 2.3.14 Cohesive Sediment Transport Parameters ............................... 24 2.3.15 Bedrock Geometry and Parameters ......................................... 24 2.4 2000 to 2005 Simulation Results ........................................................ 30 2.5 Sensitivity Study ................................................................................. 46 2.5.1 Reference Shear Stress ................................................................ 46 2.5.2 Active Layer Thickness ............................................................... 47 2.5.3 Transport Formula ....................................................................... 47 2.5.4 Manning Roughness Coefficient ................................................. 48 2.5.5 Minimization ............................................................................... 49 2.5.6 Bed Sub-layer Transfer ............................................................... 50 2.5.7 Hiding/Exposure Coefficient ....................................................... 51 2.6 2005 to 2008 Results ........................................................................... 53 2.7 Future Predictions ............................................................................... 55 2.8 Modeling Summary ............................................................................ 55 3 SRH-2D Application to Chosui River ................................................... 57 3.1 Description of the Engineering Scheme Simulated ............................ 57 3.2 Numerical Model Details .................................................................... 59 3.2.1 Solution Domain and Mesh Generation ...................................... 60 3.2.2 Bathymetric and Topographic Data ............................................ 61 3.2.3 Representation of Flow Roughness and Bed Gradation.............. 64 3.2.4 Boundary Conditions................................................................... 67 3.2.5 Other Model Parameters .............................................................. 69 3.3 Model Results ..................................................................................... 70 3.4 Summary ............................................................................................. 75 i 4 Bank Erosion Modeling – A Progress Report ...................................... 77 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 77 4.2 Bank Erosion Processes ...................................................................... 77 4.2.1 Hydraulic Fluvial Processes ........................................................ 78 4.2.2 Mass Failure Processes ................................................................ 79 4.3 Important Factors Associated with Bank Erosion .............................. 83 4.4 Bank Erosion Model Review .............................................................. 86 4.4.1 Empirical Models ........................................................................ 86 4.4.2 Process-based Models ................................................................. 88 4.4.3 Summary ..................................................................................... 91 4.5 Proposed Bank Erosion Models .......................................................... 91 4.5.1 A General Discussion of Basal Erosion ...................................... 92 4.5.2 Non-Cohesive Bank Model ......................................................... 93 4.5.3 Cohesive Bank Model ................................................................. 96 4.5.4 BSTEM Technical Description ................................................... 96 4.6 Progress of Non-Cohesive Model Development .............................. 111 4.7 Progress of Cohesive Model Development ....................................... 117 5 Turbidity Current Modeling – A Progress Report ............................ 118 5.1 Background ....................................................................................... 118 5.2 Plunge Point Determination .............................................................. 118 5.3 Governing Equations ........................................................................ 122 5.4 Numerical Methods ........................................................................... 125 5.5 Preliminary Case Study Results ........................................................ 130 5.5.1 Unsteady Modeling with SRH-2D ............................................ 130 5.5.2 A Numerical Issue Associated with the Turbidity Current Numerical Method .................................................................................. 137 5.5.3 Simulation of Turbidity Currents in the Laboratory Setting ..... 139 5.6 Potential Model Limitations ............................................................. 147 6 References .............................................................................................. 148 ii Index of Figures Page Figure 1. Flows used in simulations from January 2000 to October 2005. .......... 11 Figure 2. Simulated flows for the period November 2005 to October 2008. ....... 11 Figure 3. Peak flows at given years near Shih-Gang Dam (Water Resources Agency,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B
    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
    River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Overview In the discussion of river, or fluvial systems, and the strategies that may be used in the management of fluvial systems, it is important to have a basic understanding of the fundamental principals of how river systems work. This fact sheet will illustrate how sediment moves in the river, and the general response of the fluvial system when changes are imposed on or occur in the watershed, river channel, and the sediment supply. The Working River The complex river network that is an integral component of Vermont’s landscape is created as water flows from higher to lower elevations. There is an inherent supply of potential energy in the river systems created by the change in elevation between the beginning and ending points of the river or within any discrete stream reach. This potential energy is expressed in a variety of ways as the river moves through and shapes the landscape, developing a complex fluvial network, with a variety of channel and valley forms and associated aquatic and riparian habitats. Excess energy is dissipated in many ways: contact with vegetation along the banks, in turbulence at steps and riffles in the river profiles, in erosion at meander bends, in irregularities, or roughness of the channel bed and banks, and in sediment, ice and debris transport (Kondolf, 2002). Sediment Production, Transport, and Storage in the Working River Sediment production is influenced by many factors, including soil type, vegetation type and coverage, land use, climate, and weathering/erosion rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Agency Functional Activities
    Appendix B – Federal Agency Functional Activities Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Point of Contact: Wyeth (Chad) Wallace, (720) 407-0638 The mission of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is to enhance the quality of life, to promote economic opportunity, and to carry out the responsibility to protect and improve the trust assets of American Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska Natives. Divided into regions (see map), the BIA is responsible for the administration and management of 55 million surface acres and 57 million acres of subsurface minerals estates held in trust by the United States for approximately 1.9 million American Indians and Alaska Natives, and 565 federally recognized American Indian tribes. The primary public policy of the Federal government in regards to Native Americans is the return of trust lands management responsibilities to those most affected by decisions on how these American Indian Trust (AIT) lands are to be used and developed. Enhanced elevation data, orthoimagery, and GIS technology are needed to enable tribal organizations to wholly manage significant, profitable and sustainable enterprises as diverse as forestry, water resources, mining, oil and gas, transportation, tourism, agriculture and range land leasing and management, while preserving and protecting natural and cultural resources on AIT lands. Accurate and current elevation data are especially mission-critical for management of forest and water resources. It is the mission of BIA’s Irrigation, Power and Safety of Dams (IPSOD) program to promote self-determination, economic opportunities and public safety through the sound management of irrigation, dam and power facilities owned by the BIA. This program generates revenues for the irrigation and power projects of $80M to $90M annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic and Hydraulic Assessment of the Bear River in and Near Evanston, Wyoming
    GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC ASSESSMENT OF THE BEAR RIVER IN AND NEAR EVANSTON, WYOMING By M.E. SMITH anc/M.L. MADERAK____________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4032 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF EVANSTON and UINTA COUNTY Cheyenne, Wyoming 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ROBERT M. HIRSCH, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, MS 517 2617 E. Lincolnway, Suite B Denver Federal Center Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................._^ 2 Purpose and scope....................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................... 2 Approach................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods of analysis...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 9-12-2004 Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska M. C. McCullough University of Nebraska-Lincoln J. L. Harper University of Nebraska-Lincoln D. E. Eisenhauer University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] M. G. Dosskey USDA National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons McCullough, M. C.; Harper, J. L.; Eisenhauer, D. E.; and Dosskey, M. G., "Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska" (2004). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 147. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/147 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. This is not a peer-reviewed article. Self-Sustaining Solutions for Streams, Wetlands, and Watersheds, Proceedings of the 12-15 September 2004 Conference (St. Paul, Minnesota USA) Publication Date 12 September 2004 ASAE Publication Number 701P0904. Ed. J. L. D'Ambrosio Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska M. C. McCullough1, J. L. Harper2, D.E. Eisenhauer3, M. G. Dosskey4 ABSTRACT We assessed the effect of beaver dams on channel gradation of an incised stream in an agricultural area of eastern Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make a Meandering River
    COMMENTARY How to make a meandering river Alan D. Howard1 Department of Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 400123, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 espite the ubiquity of mean- dering rivers in nature, only recently have appropriate ex- perimental conditions been Dproduced to replicate a stably meander- ing stream in the laboratory, as de- scribed in a recent issue of PNAS (1). Meandering channels occur in a wide variety of sedimentary environments, including on deep sea fans formed by turbidity currents (2), as relict meanders on Mars (3) (Fig. 1), and as channels formed by flowing alkenes on Titan. The mechanics of formation of mean- ders is reasonably well understood (4). When flow enters a channel bed, a heli- cal secondary current is set up that in- creases flow velocity and channel depth along the outer bank in proportion to bed curvature, which encourages bank erosion. The secondary current has an intrinsic downstream scale related to flow velocity and depth; this results in gradual increase in bend amplitude and propagation of the meandering pattern upstream and downstream. Linear the- ory of flow in bends (5) has permitted construction of simulation models that replicate many aspects of meandering Fig. 1. Fossil highly sinuous meandering channel and floodplain on Mars. Red arrows point to repre- behavior, including meander cutoffs, sentative locations along channel. The channel bed is now a ridge (in inverted relief) because wind erosion creation of oxbow lakes, and patterns of has removed finer sediment from the floodplain and surrounding terrain. The low curvilinear ridges floodplain sedimentation (6, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Creating Meander Geometry Photo(S)
    Practice Title Re-creating meander geometry Photo(s) Greene County streams after their meander geometry was restored to the extent necessary to move sediment and flow without excess erosion or deposition (bottom photos). The proper meander geometry is determined through detailed stream assessment. Also, a diagram showing the typical position of pools and riffles within a meandering stream, and a few other stream meander geometry patterns (top). Summary of Practice The winding pattern of a river or stream is called its meander pattern. These meanders result in a longer channel with a lower slope. These curves slow down the water and absorb energy, which helps to reduce the potential for erosion. The velocity of a stream is typically greatest on the outside of a meander bend. The increased force of this water often results in erosion along this bank, extending a short distance downstream. On the inside of the bend, the stream velocity typically decreases, which often results in the deposition of sediment, usually sand and gravel. If you could look at the long-term history of a valley over hundreds or thousands of years, you would see that the stream has moved back and forth across the valley bottom. In fact, this lateral migration of the channel, accompanied by down cutting, is what has formed the valley. Success in stream management is based on working with the stream, not against it. If a reach of channel is suffering unusual bank erosion, down cutting of the bed, aggradation, change of channel pattern, or other evidence of instability, a realistic approach to addressing these problems should be based on restoring the system’s equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Aggradation by Beaver Darns on a Small Agricultural Stream In
    /'/ ,L. 8'-- Channel Aggradation by Beaver Darns on a Small Agricultural Stream in. Eastern Nebraska 41. C. ~e~ullou~h',J. L. 33arperz,D.E. ~isenbauer',41. G.~osske~' MSTUCT We assessed the effect of beaver dams on channel gadation of an incised stream in an agricultural area of eastern Nebraska. A topogaphic survey was conducted of a reach of Little hluddy Creek where beaver are known to have been building dams for twelve years. Results indicate that over this time period the thalweg elevation has aggraded an average of 0.65 m by trapping 1730 t of sediment in the pools behd dams. Beaver may provide a feasible solution to channel depradation problems in this region. =WORDS. Beaver dams, channel aggradation, sediment, agricultural watershed. In eastern Nebraska, most land, which at one time was tallgrass prairie, has been converted to agricultural land use. This conversion has impacted stream channels both directly and indirectly. One major impact of row-crop agriculture is the increase in overland runoff and peak flows in channels. Between 1904 and 19 15 many stream channels in southeastern Hebraska were dredged and straightened (Wahl and Weiss 19881, resulting in shorter and steeper channels. These changes have resulted in severe channel incision and stream bank instability in eastern Nebraska and throughout the deep loess regions of the central Tjniied States (Lohnes 1997). This trend towards continued channel degradation continues to this day (Zellars and Hotc~ss1997), creating environmental and economic concerns. Beaver aEect geomorphology of streams in ways that may counteract channel degrading processes. Beaver dams reduce stream velocities, causing the rate of sediment deposition to increase behind the dam (Naiman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus Codes (For Nebraska Only)
    UnitedHealthcare® Community Plan Medical Policy Omnibus Codes (for Nebraska Only) Policy Number: CS087NE.AI Effective Date: February 1, 2020 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Commercial Policy Application ..................................................................................... 1 • Omnibus Codes Coverage Summary ....................................................................... 1 Coverage Rationale/Clinical Evidence ......................................... 8 Policy History/Revision Information ......................................... 142 Instructions for Use ................................................................... 143 Application This Medical Policy only applies to the state of Nebraska Coverage Summary All CPT/HCPCS codes/services addressed in this policy are noted in the table below. Click the code link to be directed to the full coverage rationale and clinical evidence applicable to each of the listed procedures. CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association Code Description Conclusion 0061U Transcutaneous measurement of five biomarkers (tissue oxygenation [StO2], Unproven oxyhemoglobin [ctHbO2], deoxyhemoglobin [ctHbR], papillary and reticular dermal hemoglobin concentrations [ctHb1 and ctHb2]), using spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) and multi-spectral analysis 0100T Placement of a subconjunctival retinal prosthesis receiver and pulse Unproven generator, and implantation of intra-ocular retinal electrode array, with vitrectomy 0174T Computer-aided detection (CAD)
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Morphology of the Shag River, North Otago 2
    Channel morphology of the Shag River, North Otago Channel Morphology of the Shag River, North Otago 2 Otago Regional Council Private Bag 1954, Dunedin 9054 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin 9016 Phone 03 474 0827 Fax 03 479 0015 Freephone 0800 474 082 www.orc.govt.nz © Copyright for this publication is held by the Otago Regional Council. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part provided the source is fully and clearly acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-478-37692-0 Report writer: Jacob Williams, Natural Hazards Analyst Reviewed by: Michael Goldsmith, Manager Natural Hazards Published September 2014 3 Channel Morphology of the Shag River, North Otago Technical summary Changes in the channel morphology of the Shag River/Waihemo have been assessed using visual inspections, aerial and ground photography, and cross-section data collected in April 2009 and October 2013. This assessment provides an update on changes in channel morphology that have occurred since the last catchment-wide analysis of long term trends in 2009. This report describes the nature of those changes where they have been significant and is intended to inform decisions relating to the management of the Shag River/Waihemo, including gravel extraction, floodwater conveyance, and asset management. Cross-section analysis of the Shag River/Waihemo indicates that between April 2009 and October 2013 there was an overall increase in mean bed level (MBL) at 16 of the 22 surveyed cross-sections (as shown on Figure 5), and a decrease in MBL at 6 cross-sections. This indicates that (in the short term) the Shag River/Waihemo is showing signs of changing from a state of overall degradation (as described in the previous analysis of channel morphology in 2009) to one of aggradation/stability.
    [Show full text]