DOCSLIB.ORG

PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms. We hypothesize that a subsequent increase in the frequency of intense runoff events after 48 ka, combined with the diversion of flow over steep but unchannelized bedrock surfaces, led to a brief and unusual episode of rapid canyon cutting. This work illustrates a specific mechanism by which climate change can induce river incision, and conversely how information on climate may be recorded in the morphology of erosional landscapes. INTRODUCTION a silt line left by floodwaters that was positioned 4.5 meters above the streambed. Carved into thick sandstones and limestones by flash These slot canyons are among the most-visited back- floods, slot canyons of the Colorado Plateau are beautiful, country sites in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monu- dangerous, and popular. The slot canyons of our study area ment, and hikers sometimes become disoriented by this (figures 1, 2) are cut into the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone landscape with “too many canyons." With only a few hours and lie along Dry Fork—a tributary of the Escalante River. of walking, it is possible to see six different, broad canyons The drainage area of Dry Fork above the confluence with without a sizable, active stream as well as six short, narrow Spooky Slot (figure 2) is 65 square kilometers (Wohl and slots that show clear evidence of large-scale, recent flood- others, 1999). The Straight Cliffs escarpment, the north- ing. On maps and aerial photos, it becomes clear that each east margin of the Kaiparowits Plateau (figure 2A), is 2200 of these six slot canyons is paired with a broad, abandoned meters above sea level and forms the southwestern drain- canyon (figures 2C, 3, 4, 5). A seventh slot canyon (just age divide of Dry Fork, which lies 700 meters below that east of Brimstone Canyon, figures 2C, 4), is an “orphan.” escarpment. Peekaboo Slot and Spooky Slot (figure 2) have It is no longer connected to the stream that cut it, and its drainage areas of less than 10 square kilometers. Even in adjacent “parent” canyon has no thick alluvium and floods these small drainages, runoff from bedrock during heavy regularly. rainstorms generates violent floods. From Dry Fork slot Van Williams (1984) of the U.S. Geological Survey (trunk slot #1 in figure 2), Wohl and others (1999) reported was the first to study these canyons. He recognized two 1Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Loope, D.B., Goble, R.J., and Johnson, J.P.L., 2014, Prelude to seven slots—filling Lincoln, NE and subsequent modification of seven broad canyons in the Navajo Sandstone, 2The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, south-central Utah, in MacLean, J.S., Biek, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., editors, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, TX Geology of Utah’s Far South: Utah Geological Association Publication 43, p. 11–24. Loope, D.B., Goble, R.J., and Johnson, J.P.L. Johnson, and R.J., Goble, D.B., Loope, Figure 1. Hikers in Peekaboo Slot. Photo by Jim Elder. PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH – – UTAH SOUTH-CENTRAL SANDSTONE, NAVAJO THE IN CANYONS BROAD SEVEN OF MODIFICATION SUBSEQUENT AND FILLING SLOTS: SEVEN TO PRELUDE 12 UGA Publication 43 (2014)—Geology of Utah's Far South 3203, 04 A – UTAH SOUTH-CENTRAL SANDSTONE, NAVAJO THE IN CANYONS BROAD SEVEN OF MODIFICATION SUBSEQUENT AND FILLING SLOTS: SEVEN TO PRELUDE 3099 study area N 8c ** recent landslides 3 Dr y F older landslides ork debris ow colluvium Big Hollow Wash and alluvium Coyote OSL sample* 4 gure in text 0 5 10 H Gulch o l e- kilometers in - t h e- Ro ck B ID R WY o ad N Straight Clis NV 6 UT CO study area * pre-55,000 yrs AZ present 37 29’ 20” N 4 C 7a 7b 3098 Peekaboo * 2896 Spooky * N 2895 * 5b Trunk #1 11b Trunk #3 9c Trunk #2 5a 9a W 11’07” Brimstone Parking 111 3096* *3097 “orphan” slot Trunk #4 9b sandy wash subject to J.P.L Johnson, and R.J., Goble, D.B., Loope, ooding 11c slot canyon * 3415 abandoned no ooding water course 8ab abandoned (“orphan”) slot 0 0.5 1.0 ** ow direction of oods 3340 kilometers 3338 OSL sample* 3 gure in text . Figure 2. Maps of the study area, showing locations of sample sites and figures. A. Surficial geologic map of Williams (1985), showing setting of study area. B. Configuration of drainages prior to alluviation. C. Present configuration of slot canyons and abandoned water- courses. MacLean, J.S., Biek, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., editors 13 Loope, D.B., Goble, R.J., and Johnson, J.P.L. Johnson, and R.J., Goble, D.B., Loope, Figure 3. Air photo looking downstream (eastward) above Dry Fork, with south-flowing tributaries: Peekaboo, Spooky, and Brimstone. Note pairings of slot canyons and abandoned, sand-filled canyons, and extent of remaining alluvium, mantles of wind-blown sand, and the sea of naked Navajo Sandstone bedrock (Jna). PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH – – UTAH SOUTH-CENTRAL SANDSTONE, NAVAJO THE IN CANYONS BROAD SEVEN OF MODIFICATION SUBSEQUENT AND FILLING SLOTS: SEVEN TO PRELUDE Figure 4. Oblique Google Earth image looking north. “P” marks location of parking lot. 14 UGA Publication 43 (2014)—Geology of Utah's Far South PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH – – UTAH SOUTH-CENTRAL SANDSTONE, NAVAJO THE IN CANYONS BROAD SEVEN OF MODIFICATION SUBSEQUENT AND FILLING SLOTS: SEVEN TO PRELUDE Figure 5. Alluvial fills and slot canyons. White arrows show people for scale. See figure 2 for locations. A. Northward view of thick alluvial fill of the trunk of Dry Fork #1 as seen from entry trail. People are about to enter trunk slot #1. B. Northward view of the alluvium-filled former course of Peekaboo and of Peekaboo Slot at its junction with Dry Fork. Loope, D.B., Goble, R.J., and Johnson, J.P.L Johnson, and R.J., Goble, D.B., Loope, important things: (1) the slot canyons formed during epi- Boison and Patton (1985) hypothesized that Dry Fork sodes of rapid down-cutting by Dry Fork into its own thick, received less of the alluvium because it, unlike Big Hollow sandy alluvium; and (2) filling of the broad canyons could (figure 2A), did not receive landslide debris in recent (late have resulted from a Pleistocene increase in landslides and Holocene) times. These geologists realized that Dry Fork, debris flows in the steep tributaries that drain the Straight during an earlier episode of alluviation (too old for radio- Cliffs escarpment (figure 6). His radiocarbon dates showed carbon dating), had filled to a much greater depth than 10 that the most recent episode of canyon filling (alluviation) meters. In this preliminary report of our work at Dry Fork, in Dry Fork and nearby Big Hollow is Holocene, and be- we present optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages gan about 2500 years ago and ended prior to 730 years ago from alluvium that now lies as much as 40 meters above . (Williams, 1984; Boison and Patton, 1985). Alluvium that the floor of Dry Fork, and we tentatively hypothesize that, now lies as much as 10 meters above the modern channel although some of alluvium may have been sourced from floor records that episode. Pleistocene landslides, much of the ancient alluvium is MacLean, J.S., Biek, R.F., and Huntoon, J.E., editors 15 Loope, D.B., Goble, R.J., and Johnson, J.P.L. Johnson, and R.J., Goble, D.B., Loope, Figure 6. Sooner Slide, a Holocene landslide at the base of the Straight Cliffs escarpment. See figure 2 for location. Photo by Jon Mason and Jodi Norris. likely composed of sediment that was sorted during wind 3340), the alluvium is composed of alternating beds of silt transport before it entered the headwaters of Dry Fork.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
    [Show full text]
  • River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
    River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Overview In the discussion of river, or fluvial systems, and the strategies that may be used in the management of fluvial systems, it is important to have a basic understanding of the fundamental principals of how river systems work. This fact sheet will illustrate how sediment moves in the river, and the general response of the fluvial system when changes are imposed on or occur in the watershed, river channel, and the sediment supply. The Working River The complex river network that is an integral component of Vermont’s landscape is created as water flows from higher to lower elevations. There is an inherent supply of potential energy in the river systems created by the change in elevation between the beginning and ending points of the river or within any discrete stream reach. This potential energy is expressed in a variety of ways as the river moves through and shapes the landscape, developing a complex fluvial network, with a variety of channel and valley forms and associated aquatic and riparian habitats. Excess energy is dissipated in many ways: contact with vegetation along the banks, in turbulence at steps and riffles in the river profiles, in erosion at meander bends, in irregularities, or roughness of the channel bed and banks, and in sediment, ice and debris transport (Kondolf, 2002). Sediment Production, Transport, and Storage in the Working River Sediment production is influenced by many factors, including soil type, vegetation type and coverage, land use, climate, and weathering/erosion rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Agency Functional Activities
    Appendix B – Federal Agency Functional Activities Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Point of Contact: Wyeth (Chad) Wallace, (720) 407-0638 The mission of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is to enhance the quality of life, to promote economic opportunity, and to carry out the responsibility to protect and improve the trust assets of American Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska Natives. Divided into regions (see map), the BIA is responsible for the administration and management of 55 million surface acres and 57 million acres of subsurface minerals estates held in trust by the United States for approximately 1.9 million American Indians and Alaska Natives, and 565 federally recognized American Indian tribes. The primary public policy of the Federal government in regards to Native Americans is the return of trust lands management responsibilities to those most affected by decisions on how these American Indian Trust (AIT) lands are to be used and developed. Enhanced elevation data, orthoimagery, and GIS technology are needed to enable tribal organizations to wholly manage significant, profitable and sustainable enterprises as diverse as forestry, water resources, mining, oil and gas, transportation, tourism, agriculture and range land leasing and management, while preserving and protecting natural and cultural resources on AIT lands. Accurate and current elevation data are especially mission-critical for management of forest and water resources. It is the mission of BIA’s Irrigation, Power and Safety of Dams (IPSOD) program to promote self-determination, economic opportunities and public safety through the sound management of irrigation, dam and power facilities owned by the BIA. This program generates revenues for the irrigation and power projects of $80M to $90M annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Location of Selected Surface-Water Sites and Springs, Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2004–5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Location of selected surface-water sites and springs, Escalante River drainage basin—Plate 1 Wilberg, D.E., and Stolp, B.J., 2004, Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 111°45' 111°05' 114 ° 113 ° 112 ° 111° 42 ° T. 30 S. T. 31 S. Great 15 Salt 110 ° 109 ° B 41 ° Lake ou Salt Lake City lde r M Provo ou 40 ° nt ain 39 ° Utah Study 38 ° area Garfield County Kane County 37 ° E a s t F o T. 31 S. r k T. 32 S. 21 East Fork Boulder Creek near Boulder EXPLANATION B o u Boundary of study area l d u e s Platea r Aquariu C r Boundary of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument e e k Road k e e r C C ir Stream c r e le e C D l 16 38°00' if Surface-water site and number k fs or 22 East Fork Deer Creek near Boulder t F 38°00' as Spring E +35 Mile marker—Labeled every 5 miles T. 32 S. T. 33 S. 12 Dixie National Forest s il n a i Tr a t n p u o Boulder rr o T u B M n i f f i D r e e T. 33 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Paria Canyon Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness Management Plan
    01\16• ,.J ~ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -- BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ~Lf 1.,.J/ t'CI/C w~P 0 ARIZONA STRIP FIELD OFFICE/KANAB RESOURCE AREA PARIA CANYONNERMILION CLIFFS WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA-AZ-01 0-97-16 I. INTRODUCTION The Paria Canyon - Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness Area contains 112,500 acres (92,500 acres in Coconino County, Arizona and 20,000 acres in Kane County, Utah) of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management. The area is approximately 10 to 30 miles west of Page, Arizona. Included are 35 miles of the Paria river Canyon, 15 miles of the Buckskin Gulch, Coyote Buttes, and the Vermilion Cliffs from Lee's Ferry to House Rock Valley (Map 1). The Paria Canyon, Buckskin Gulch, Wire Pass, and the Coyote Buttes Special Management Area are part of the larger Paria Canyon-Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness, designated in August 1984 (Map 2). Existing management plan guidance is to protect primitive, natural conditions and the many outstanding opportunities for hiking, backpacking, photographing, or viewing in the seven different highly scenic geologic formations from which the canyons and buttes are carved. Visitor use in Paria Canyon, Buckskin Gulch, and Coyote Buttes has increased from 2,400 visits in Fiscal Year (FY) 1986 to nearly 10,000 visits in FY96-a 375% increase in use over 10 years. This increased use, combined with the narrow nature of the canyons, small camping terraces, and changing visitor use patterns, is impacting the wilderness character of these areas. Human waste, overcrowding, and public safety have become important issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 9-12-2004 Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska M. C. McCullough University of Nebraska-Lincoln J. L. Harper University of Nebraska-Lincoln D. E. Eisenhauer University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] M. G. Dosskey USDA National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons McCullough, M. C.; Harper, J. L.; Eisenhauer, D. E.; and Dosskey, M. G., "Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska" (2004). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 147. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/147 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. This is not a peer-reviewed article. Self-Sustaining Solutions for Streams, Wetlands, and Watersheds, Proceedings of the 12-15 September 2004 Conference (St. Paul, Minnesota USA) Publication Date 12 September 2004 ASAE Publication Number 701P0904. Ed. J. L. D'Ambrosio Channel Aggradation by Beaver Dams on a Small Agricultural Stream in Eastern Nebraska M. C. McCullough1, J. L. Harper2, D.E. Eisenhauer3, M. G. Dosskey4 ABSTRACT We assessed the effect of beaver dams on channel gradation of an incised stream in an agricultural area of eastern Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 ON THE COVER Water quality monitoring site ESC02 on the Escalante River in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Photography by SCPN Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 Melissa Dyer Stephen A. Monroe Stacy E. Stumpf National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network 525 S. Beaver, Building 20 PO Box 5663 Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5663 December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conserva- tion and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. Please direct any data requests to the water resources project manager or the SCPN data manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000
    Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000 Mark Vinson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 1 April 2001 i Table of contents Page Foreword ........................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Study area ......................................................................... 1 Long-term repeat sampling sites ........................................................ 2 Methods Locations and physical habitat ................................................... 3 Aquatic invertebrates Qualitative samples...................................................... 3 Quantitative samples ..................................................... 4 Laboratory methods ........................................................... 4 Results Sampling locations............................................................ 5 Habitat types................................................................. 6 Water temperatures ........................................................... 8 Aquatic invertebrates .......................................................... 8 Literature cited..................................................................... 13 Appendices 1. Aquatic invertebrates collected in the major habitats A. Alcove pools ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area
    JurassicJurassic NavajoNavajo Sandstone,Sandstone, GlenGlen CanyonCanyon NationalNational RecreationRecreation AreaArea –– OutcropOutcrop AnalogAnalog forfor thethe JurassicJurassic NuggetNugget SandstoneSandstone Reservoir,Reservoir, ThrustThrust BeltBelt NAVAJO SANDSTONE OUTCROP CHARACTERISTICS Spectacular contorted bedding in Navajo Sandstone; south side of Antelope Island in Lake Powell. Location of reservoirs that produce oil (green) and gas and condensate (red) from the Jurassic Nugget Sandstone, Utah and Wyoming. The Index map to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah Nugget Sandstone play area is dotted. and Arizona (modified from Hintze, 1997; topographic relief base map modified with permission, courtesy of Navajo Sandstone beds display pronounced trough Chalk Butte, Inc., Boulder, Wyoming). cross-bedding which indicates the paleowinds NUGGET SANDSTONE RESERVOIR were from the north and northwest. CHARACTERISTICS • Net pay – 70 to 1000 ft (21-300 m) • Depositional environments – eolian dune (straight-crested to sinuous, coalescing, transverse barchanoid ridges), interdune/playa • Lithology – dune deposits = sandstone (fine- to coarse-grained, subangular to subrounded sand or silt grains cemented by calcite), interdune/playa = sandstone and siltstone with some carbonate (limestone and dolomite) and evaporite • Pore types – intergrainular, fractures • Porosity - averages 11-15%, enhanced by natural fracture systems • Permeability – less than 1 md to 50 md, averaging 18 md Typical limestone oasis deposit near the top of the Navajo Sandstone; Forgotten Canyon. Mudcracks in oasis limestone mud above bed Rapid pinch out of thin limestone bed; Moki Canyon. • Framework and matrix grains in sandstone (>1/16 mm and 1/16 to 1/256 containing ripple marks; Forgotten Canyon. mm, respectively) and siltstone are commonly composed of more than 90 percent quartz (usually frosted) with varying amounts of K-feldspar, plagioclase, and rock fragments Photomicrographs (crossed nicols) of Navajo Sandstone oasis deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagenetic Coloration Facies and Alteration History of the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Zion National Park and Vicinity, Southwestern Utah
    DIAGENETIC COLORATION FACIES AND ALTERATION HISTORY OF THE JURASSIC NAVAJO SANDSTONE, ZION NATIONAL PARK AND VICINITY, SOUTHWESTERN UTAH Gregory B. Nielsen, Marjorie A. Chan, and Erich U. Petersen Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Utah 115 S. 1460 E., Rm. 383 FASB Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0102 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Coloration patterns in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of Zion National Park and vicinity are examined using a broad variety of geochemical, geospatial, petrographic, and bedform analysis techniques. Six diagenetic coloration facies (including 12 subfacies) are defined and characterized. Results indicate a prolonged and complex diagenetic history with variations in color resulting largely from changes in the concentration and distri- bution of iron oxides. In the northern Kolob Plateau, the Navajo Sandstone has a uniform red pigmentation (red primary facies) that formed during early diagenesis to produce the “primary” sandstone color. In contrast, Navajo Sandstone of main Zion Canyon displays “secondary” alteration features occurring in three distinct vertical coloration facies: brown (lower), pink (middle), and white (upper). The white and pink facies in Zion Canyon are characterized by a combination of prevalent bleaching, areas of remnant “primary” sandstone, and small concretionary iron-enriched lenses. Bleaching is concentrated in the upper Navajo Sandstone where alteration occurred during middle diagenesis (deep burial). Widespread bleaching and alteration in Zion Canyon terminates abruptly in the central park but narrow, well-defined, white bleached bands locally follow high-permeability beds northward for several kilometers into the red-colored Kolob Plateau (red/white facies). The brown facies is characterized by widespread dark iron oxide cement concentrations precipitated beneath a well-defined subhorizontal boundary.
    [Show full text]