DOCSLIB.ORG

Map Showing Location of Selected Surface-Water Sites and Springs, Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Map Showing Location of Selected Surface-Water Sites and Springs, Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2004–5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Location of selected surface-water sites and springs, Escalante River drainage basin—Plate 1 Wilberg, D.E., and Stolp, B.J., 2004, Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 111°45' 111°05' 114 ° 113 ° 112 ° 111° 42 ° T. 30 S. T. 31 S. Great 15 Salt 110 ° 109 ° B 41 ° Lake ou Salt Lake City lde r M Provo ou 40 ° nt ain 39 ° Utah Study 38 ° area Garfield County Kane County 37 ° E a s t F o T. 31 S. r k T. 32 S. 21 East Fork Boulder Creek near Boulder EXPLANATION B o u Boundary of study area l d u e s Platea r Aquariu C r Boundary of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument e e k Road k e e r C C ir Stream c r e le e C D l 16 38°00' if Surface-water site and number k fs or 22 East Fork Deer Creek near Boulder t F 38°00' as Spring E +35 Mile marker—Labeled every 5 miles T. 32 S. T. 33 S. 12 Dixie National Forest s il n a i Tr a t n p u o Boulder rr o T u B M n i f f i D r e e T. 33 S. r G T. 34 S. C re Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument e k 9 Pine Creek near Escalante C a lf Deer Creek C 23 re near Boulder e k W e B a t P o u t n i n l e e d a Spring in headwaters of e r l C S1 r p r a Birch Creek e C e o S r c k a e e c s n D d k k e E a C e th r H e t o l e lo k F 2 Birch Creek w o l d M n a o m Calf Creek above y i n e a Calf Creek at Bureau of Land Management C C T. 34 S. r e e Bureau of Land s e campground r k 16 o B N Management H T. 35 S. a o S9 Calf Creek Spring r campground bridge r th n C 17 e r e Boulder Creek y Spring area in Corn Creek e 12 Mamie Creek at mouth Escalante River below k Escalante Sand Creek Calf Creek near Boulder T S2 B + + + S7 Spring in Mamie Creek Calf Creek at US Geological 24 o ir 5 + c at mouth at mouth T p h + Survey temporary gage h + 11 19 C + Spring in Sand Creek 14 18 e North Creek near 10 re Escalante River S8 + + + + G e + u Escalante River near l k Escalante + 15 Escalante River above Calf Creek c above Mamie Creek + 13 h Escalante at 10 Birch Creek at mouth 1 Escalante River 15 8 Escalante River US Geological Survey gage + 7 above Sand Creek + + Boulder Creek Birch Creek 6 S6 Birch Creek near 3 Spring above confluence + at mouth Unnamed 25 20 Escalante with North Creek + + 26 tributary 37°45' Escalante River above 20 + + 12 Boulder Creek 37°45' S3 Spring near Yankee Meadow S10 Seepage from fracture in + 5 Upper Valley Creek Navajo Sandstone, right + 12 near Escalante bank below Boulder Creek 25+ The Gulch at mouth + Escalante River Unnamed tributary 27 + 30 31 below The Gulch 29 + Escalante River above The Gulch + +30 Unnamed tributary 33 Horse Canyon 28 S11 + Spring above Aspen Creek S5 wall S12 32 Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument 35 Escalante River above Horse Canyon T. 35 S. Alvey Wash Spring Spring In + y fern glen T. 36 S. S4 Garden Spring near le alcove + al Glen Canyon Upper Valley r V pe + National Recreation p h U s + 35 a Area E k W e + e 4 Upper Valley Creek near Liston Flat y + s r e C c v s l a l al A l F S15 Oak Spring a r + n ve t il + e S +40 + 34 Silver Falls Creek at mouth Harris Wash at mouth 37 36 Escalante River above Harris Wash ash W k ris + e ar e H r + C + R iv e 45 r R. 1 W. R. 1 E. + + 38 Unnamed tributary above Fence Canyon T. 36 S. y S14 Rock Spring d T. 37 S. H o o + o l e M 39 Escalante River above Fence Canyon in + Fence Canyon at mouth 40 41 Neon Canyon th n e o S13 Horse Spring y n a + R C o nce c Fe + 50 k R n o nyo a + Ca d Escalante River above dy + oo + 44Twentyfive Mile Wash M 45Twentyfive Mile Wash st + Ea at mouth+ on + ny + Ca 55 + 46 le Moody Creek Mi 47 43 Escalante River below Moody Creek Tw e + Collet Canyon Twentymile Wash near Escalante en yfiv + nd t tyf ent 60 Right Ha ive M Wash Tw + ile 48 East Moody Canyon at mouth S16 Camp Spring + + on Garfield County Unnamed T. 37 S. ny 65 Ca + + tributary R. 1 E. R. 2 E. S23 Spring in tuning fork canyon T. 38 S. tt Escalante River 52 lle + o Kane County C above Scorpion Gulch 49 + + 53 Mouth of unnamed tributary Spring in Wingate Formation, above Scorpion Gulch S20 51 Scorpion Gulch at mouth S19 Spring near Willard Canyon d + an Scorpion Gulch near mouth 50 S22 Spring at Wingate-Chinle contact 200 feet downstream of S21 H S21 42 h t Left Hand Collett Canyon lc f Gu Spring at Wingate- e corpion L S Chinle contact + 70 + S17 Relishen Seep 37°30' Hardhead Water Spring S18 K R. 2 E. R. 3 E. + 54 Unnamed canyon above Fools Canyon 37°30' aip R. 4 E. R. 5 E. ar + + ow 75 i + ts + 55 Escalante River + Fo ol Fools Canyon Escalante River above Fools Canyon s + 56 Canyon at mouth + 58 80 + n 57 yo Fools Canyon + an C ns above mouth + ve te S T. 38 S. 59 Unnamed canyon above Stevens Canyon on left bank T. 39 S. ++ R. 5 E. R. 6 E. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. 85 + Escalante River above Stevens Canyon F 60 if Stevens Canyon at mouth +62 61 Stevens Canyon near mouth ty P M + 63 Escalante River at Coyote Gulch latea Co Spring in Coyote Gulch S24 u i yote le Gulc M h n o + + yo an u C n w ta Co in 90 + Spring below Coyote Gulch S25 S27 Spring below Coyote Gulch + 1 2 3 4 S26 + Spring below Coyote Gulch S28 Spring below Coyote Gulch + T. 39 S. T. 40 S. 12 il ra T Boulder rr u 5 6 B 7 8 Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument You can view and print individual letter-size pages by selecting an area. A portable document file (pdf) of the Fortymile Gulch Escalante R. 6 E. R. 7 E. 12 selected area will open in a new window 12 E s Escalante c a la n te River R iv at mouth e r H o le h 64 in c t l h e u R o c k G R o a 9 10 d 11 12 w o ill W R. 10 E. h lc u G is v a 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MILES D 13 14 15 16 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 KILOMETERS R. 7 E. R. 8 E. l el ow P 37°15' e ak 37°15' L R. 8 E. R. 9 E. 111°45' 111°05' Map showing location of selected surface-water sites and springs, Escalante River drainage basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: Wilberg, D.E. and Stolp, B.J. District Chief USGS Branch of Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 2329 Orton Circle Denver Federal Center 2004 Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Denver, CO 80225-0046 Tel: 1-888-ASK-USGS; Fax 303-202-4188.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRELUDE to SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING and SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION of SEVEN BROAD CANYONS in the NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B
    PRELUDE TO SEVEN SLOTS: FILLING AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION OF SEVEN BROAD CANYONS IN THE NAVAJO SANDSTONE, SOUTH-CENTRAL UTAH by David B. Loope1, Ronald J. Goble1, and Joel P. L. Johnson2 ABSTRACT Within a four square kilometer portion of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, seven distinct slot canyons cut the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone. Four of the slots developed along separate reaches of a trunk stream (Dry Fork of Coyote Gulch), and three (including canyons locally known as “Peekaboo” and “Spooky”) are at the distal ends of south-flowing tributary drainages. All these slot canyons are examples of epigenetic gorges—bedrock channel reaches shifted laterally from previous reach locations. The previous channels became filled with alluvium, allowing active channels to shift laterally in places and to subsequently re-incise through bedrock elsewhere. New evidence, based on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages, indicates that this thick alluvium started to fill broad, pre-existing, bedrock canyons before 55,000 years ago, and that filling continued until at least 48,000 years ago. Streams start to fill their channels when sediment supply increases relative to stream power. The following conditions favored alluviation in the study area: (1) a cooler, wetter climate increased the rate of mass wasting along the Straight Cliffs (the headwaters of Dry Fork) and the rate of weathering of the broad outcrops of Navajo and Entrada Sandstone; (2) windier conditions increased the amount of eolian sand transport, perhaps destabilizing dunes and moving their stored sediment into stream channels; and (3) southward migration of the jet stream dimin- ished the frequency and severity of convective storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1980 Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin N. Duane Atwood U.S. Forest Service, Provo, Utah Clyde L. Pritchett Brigham Young University Richard D. Porter U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Provo, Utah Benjamin W. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Atwood, N. Duane; Pritchett, Clyde L.; Porter, Richard D.; and Wood, Benjamin W. (1980) "Terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE KAIPAROWITS BASIN N. Diiane Atwood', Clyde L. Pritchctt', Richard D. Porter', and Benjamin W. Wood' .\bstr^ct.- This report inehides data collected during an investigation by Brighani Young University personnel to 1976, as well as a literature from 1971 review. The fauna of the Kaiparowits Basin is represented by 7 species of salamander, toads, mnphihians (1 5 and 1 tree frog), 29 species of reptiles (1 turtle, 16 lizards, and 12 snakes), 183 species of birds (plus 2 hypothetical), and 74 species of mammals. Geographic distribution of the various species within the basin are discussed. Birds are categorized according to their population and seasonal status.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • West Colorado River Plan
    Section 9 - West Colorado River Basin Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Background 9-1 9.3 Water Resources Problems 9-7 9.4 Water Resources Demands and Needs 9-7 9.5 Water Development and Management Alternatives 9-13 9.6 Projected Water Depletions 9-18 9.7 Policy Issues and Recommendations 9-19 Figures 9-1 Price-San Rafael Salinity Control Project Map 9-6 9-2 Wilderness Lands 9-11 9-3 Potential Reservoir Sites 9-16 9-4 Gunnison Butte Mutual Irrigation Project 9-20 9-5 Bryce Valley 9-22 Tables 9-1 Board of Water Resources Development Projects 9-3 9-2 Salinity Control Project Approved Costs 9-7 9-3 Wilderness Lands 9-8 9-4 Current and Projected Culinary Water Use 9-12 9-5 Current and Projected Secondary Water Use 9-12 9-6 Current and Projected Agricultural Water Use 9-13 9-7 Summary of Current and Projected Water Demands 9-14 9-8 Historical Reservoir Site Investigations 9-17 Section 9 West Colorado River Basin - Utah State Water Plan Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction The coordination and cooperation of all This section describes the major existing water development projects and proposed water planning water-related government agencies, and development activities in the West Colorado local organizations and individual River Basin. The existing water supplies are vital to water users will be required as the the existence of the local communities while also basin tries to meet its future water providing aesthetic and environmental values.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 ON THE COVER Water quality monitoring site ESC02 on the Escalante River in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Photography by SCPN Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 Melissa Dyer Stephen A. Monroe Stacy E. Stumpf National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network 525 S. Beaver, Building 20 PO Box 5663 Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5663 December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conserva- tion and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. Please direct any data requests to the water resources project manager or the SCPN data manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000
    Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000 Mark Vinson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 1 April 2001 i Table of contents Page Foreword ........................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Study area ......................................................................... 1 Long-term repeat sampling sites ........................................................ 2 Methods Locations and physical habitat ................................................... 3 Aquatic invertebrates Qualitative samples...................................................... 3 Quantitative samples ..................................................... 4 Laboratory methods ........................................................... 4 Results Sampling locations............................................................ 5 Habitat types................................................................. 6 Water temperatures ........................................................... 8 Aquatic invertebrates .......................................................... 8 Literature cited..................................................................... 13 Appendices 1. Aquatic invertebrates collected in the major habitats A. Alcove pools ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002
    Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 By Dale E. Wilberg and Bernard J. Stolp U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Salt Lake City, Utah 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2329 West Orton Circle Building 810 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Box 25286, Denver Federal Center http://ut.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 1-888-ASK-USGS iii CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Canyon Report
    The Degraded Reach: Rate and Pattern of Bed and Bank Adjustment of the Colorado River in the 25 km Immediately Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam Paul E. Grams1, John C. Schmidt1, David J. Topping2, and Sara Goeking1 1 Department of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources, Utah State University 2Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey July 2004 in partial fulfillment of cooperative agreement 1425-98-FC-40-22640 and modifications, between Utah State University and the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center CONTENTS CONTENTS........................................................................................................................ 2 ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................... 7 Physiographic Setting ..................................................................................................... 7 Streamflow Regulation ................................................................................................... 9 Sediment Supply ............................................................................................................. 9 Previous Geomorphic Investigations in Glen Canyon.................................................. 11 METHODS ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah, Spring Break 2009
    Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah, Spring Break 2009 This year, Jen and I decided to revive a tradition begun in our early years together: a yearly Spring Break trip to southern Utah’s desert country. The success of last year’s May excursion to Canyonlands National Park made us anxious to return. This time we started further west in Zion National Park, where we spent two nights and a day hiking the awesome (though busy) trails in Zion’s famous Virgin River Canyon. We then made our way east, breaking up the three hour drive to Escalante, Utah with a day hike in Bryce Canyon National Park. From there, a thirty-one mile drive on a dirt road got us to the Coyote Gulch trailhead, where we set out on a three night backpack the next morning. Coyote Gulch is a tributary of the Escalante River and is a part of the massive Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GCNRA). The GCNRA borders the Escalante- Grand Staircase National Monument (created by Bill Clinton in his final days in office) to the west and Capitol Reef National Park to the northeast. Other wilderness study areas, unpopulated national forest lands, and national parks are nearby (as the crow flies anyway) making this region the most Wilderness-soaked of any in the lower forty-eight. For the desert hiker used to the well-worn trails of Arches, Bryce, Zion, and Canyonlands National Parks, Coyote Gulch is a different experience. From our start at the Redwell Trailhead, we followed the canyon downstream for two days.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild & Scenic Rivers Suitability Study
    Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study for National Forest System Lands in Utah Record of Decision and Forest Plan Amendments The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study for National Forest System Lands in Utah Record of Decision and Forest Plan Amendments Counties: Box Elder, Cache, Carbon, Daggett, Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, Kane, Millard, Piute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, San Juan, Sevier, Summit, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber Counties, Utah; Montrose County, Colorado; and Uinta County, Wyoming Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Cooperating Agencies: State of Utah; Bureau of Land Management (Utah State Office); Sweetwater County Conservation District; Uinta County Conservation District; and Sweetwater and Lincoln County, Wyoming Responsible Officials: KEVIN B. ELLIOTT, FOREST SUPERVISOR Ashley National Forest, 355 North Vernal Avenue, Vernal, Utah 84078 ROBERT G. MACWHORTER, FOREST SUPERVISOR Dixie National Forest, 1789 North Wedgewood Lane, Cedar City, Utah 84720 ALLEN ROWLEY, FOREST SUPERVISOR Fishlake National Forest, 115 East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701 PAMELA BROWN, FOREST SUPERVISOR Manti-La Sal National Forest, 599 West Price River Dr., Price, Utah 84501 BRIAN A.
    [Show full text]