DOCSLIB.ORG

Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Adoption Version 22 October 2013 Copies of the accompanying evidence base including the Sustainability Appraisal Report and Background Papers can also be viewed on our website You may get further help from the Policy Team at: Selby District Council, Doncaster Road, Selby YO8 9FT [email protected] 01757 292034 01757 292229 If you require any further help or advice or if you need this document in a different format, for example large print, audio, Braille or in another language, please contact the Policy Team on (01757) 292034 or email [email protected] The Status of Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 At the time of ‘Publication’ of the Submission Draft Core Strategy (SDCS), the Development Plan for Selby District comprised the Regional Spatial Strategy (the Yorkshire and Humber Plan or RS), and ‘Saved’ Local Plan policies, namely Selby District Local Plan, North Yorkshire Minerals Local Plan and North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan. The Core Strategy is the first development plan document prepared by the Council as part of its new Local Development Framework (Local Plan). On adoption it replaces a number of the ‘Saved’ Selby District Local Plan policies1. On 6 July 2010 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced the revocation of RS with immediate effect. As a result of the Secretary of State’s revocation decision, the Council reviewed the Core Strategy and the evidence base on which it is founded, and came to the conclusion that while the policies and context provided by RS were no longer applicable, the RS evidence base remains robust and relevant, particularly since the RS evidence had been subject to a process of consultation and Examination. The Council has therefore chosen not to review the resultant targets or introduce local variations, and the Core Strategy continues to rely on the RS evidence, although references to RS have been removed from the document. Following a successful legal challenge the revocation decision was quashed and RS was reinstated as part of the Development Plan for the duration of the SDCS Examination Process until 22 February 2013 when the Revocation Order came into effect. Whilst the Core Strategy was demonstrated to be in general conformity with the RS when formally Submitted (in line with the legislation and prescribed Regulations current at that time) and through the course of the Examination; the Core Strategy Examination and evidence has also demonstrated that it is a sound document based on the National Planning Policy Framework and in the light of the revocation of the RS. 1 See Appendix A Contents Page No. The Status of the Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 List of Core Strategy Policies 1. Introduction 1 2. Key Issues and Challenges 7 Duty to Cooperate 7 District Portrait 9 Key Issue and Challenges 20 3. Vision, Aims and Objectives 2 Vision 23 Aims 23 Objectives 24 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 25 4. Spatial Development Strategy 27 Settlement Hierarchy 27 Spatial Development Strategy 32 Green Belt 40 Management of Residential Development in Settlements 43 5. Creating Sustainable Communities 46 The Scale and Distribution of Housing 46 Managing Housing Land Supply 55 Olympia Park Strategic Development Site 60 Housing Mix 65 Providing Affordable Housing 69 Rural Housing Exceptions Sites 74 Travellers 76 Access to Services, Community Facilities and 78 Infrastructure 6. Promoting Economic Prosperity 83 The Scale and Distribution of Economic Growth 83 Town Centres and Local Services 92 7. Improving the Quality of Life 98 Tackling Climate Change and Promoting 98 Sustainable Patterns of Development Improving Resource Efficiency and 106 Renewable Energy Protecting and Enhancing the Environment 112 Design Quality 117 8. Implementation 122 Including schedule of indicators and targets 125 List of Maps, Figures and Appendices Map 1 Regional Context 10 Map 2 Rivers and Flood Risk Areas 13 Map 3 Communications 14 (Roads, Motorways, Railways and Rivers) Map 4 Settlement Pattern 16 Map 5 Selby Contiguous Urban Area 33 Map 6 Olympia Park Mixed Use Strategic Development Site 64 Map 7 Green Infrastructure 80 Map 8 Environmental / Cultural Assets 113 Figure 1 The Local Plan 2 Figure 2 Core Strategy Process 3 Figure 3 Policy Context Diagram 5 Figure 4 Key Population Facts 11 Figure 5 Key Assets 12 Figure 6 Key Diagram 31 Figure 7 Proportion of Housing Development by Location 49 Figure 8 Distribution of Planned New Housing Development 51 Figure 9 Housing Trajectory 56 Figure 10 Housing Sub Areas 67 Figure 11 Profile of Household Types 68 Figure 12 Indicative Employment Land Distribution 86 Figure 13 Core Strategy Performance Indicators 125 Appendix A Schedule of Policies in the Core Strategy which 135 replace or amend the area affected by Selby District Local Plan (SDLP) Policies Appendix B Previously Developed Land Trajectory 138 Appendix C Housing Delivery and Windfalls 140 Glossary of Terms 146 List of Policies Page SP1 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 26 SP2 Spatial Development Strategy 38 SP3 Green Belt 42 SP4 Management of Residential Development in Settlements 44 SP5 The Scale and Distribution of Housing 54 SP6 Managing Housing Land Supply 59 SP7 Olympia Park Strategic Development Site 62 SP8 Housing Mix 69 SP9 Affordable Housing 74 SP10 Rural Housing Exception Sites 75 SP11 Travellers 77 SP12 Access to Services, Community Facilities, and 82 Infrastructure SP13 Scale and Distribution of Economic Growth 90 SP14 Town Centres and Local Services 96 SP15 Sustainable Development and Climate Change 104 SP16 Improving Resource Efficiency 110 SP17 Low-Carbon and Renewable Energy 111 SP18 Protecting and Enhancing the Environment 116 SP19 Design Quality 120 Selby District Core Strategy – October 2013 __________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction 1.1 The Council is preparing a series of Local Plan documents required under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 20042 and Localism Act 2011, which will form part of the new Local Plan formerly known as the ‘Local Development Framework’ (LDF). The Council’s programme for development plan production is set out in its Local Development Scheme3. 1.2 When adopted over the next few years, the new style plans will replace those policies in the Selby District Local Plan, which are ‘saved’ under transitional legislation until replaced by policies in the Local Plan4. 1.3 The Localism Act 2011 and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2012) introduced changes to the planning system which reflect a move towards a Local Plan rather than separate Development Plan Documents (DPDs). The Core Strategy is the first new-style Local Plan document to be produced by the Council and provides a strategic context with which subsequent Local Plan documents must conform. The Core Strategy covers the 16 year period from 2011 to 2027. The Core Strategy was formally adopted by the Council on 22 October 2013. 1.4 Further Local Plan documents will provide for the detailed policies and proposals to deliver the Core Strategy Vision, Aims and Objectives. Throughout this document these are referred to as the Site Allocations Local Plan and the Development Management Local Plan, but in practice these may be a single document. 1.5 Local Plans are prepared by District Councils except that Local Plan documents relating to waste and minerals matters continue to be prepared by the County Council as the Minerals Planning Authority. 1.6 Planning applications are determined against the policies in the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. For Selby District, the development plan includes adopted Local Plans5 and neighbourhood plans and is defined in section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. 1.7 All references to plans, strategies and organisations also means any successor document or body in order to ensure the Core Strategy remains up-to-date and reflects any changes which may take place over the life of this plan. 2 Defined in Section 38 of the Act as amended 3 See www.selby.gov.uk for latest Local Development Scheme 4 See Appendix A 5 The ‘Local Plan’ comprises the development plan documents adopted under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. It includes the Core Strategy and other planning policies which under the regulations would be considered to be development plan documents. The term includes old policies which have been saved under the 2004 Act and this therefore includes the Selby District Local Plan The SDLP was prepared under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and policies saved under the 2004 Act on adoption in 2005 and then ‘extended’ on 8 February 2008 by Direction of the Secretary of State under the 2004 Act until such time as superseded. - 1 - Selby District Core Strategy – October 2013 __________________________________________________________________ Figure 1 - The Local Plan [ ! 5 a ! w / / L / L ! [ [ t b 5 5 a t t t t t a 5 1.8 The Core Strategy provides: • a spatial vision for Selby District and strategic objectives to achieve that vision. • a development strategy which establishes: o The context for designating areas where specific policies will apply, either encouraging development to meet economic and/or social objectives or constraining development in the interests of environmental protection. o The identification of strategic development sites for housing and economic development to accommodate major growth in Selby and a District-wide framework for the subsequent allocation of sites for specific uses (including housing, retail, leisure and other activities). o Policies setting out the context for more detailed policies and guidance to be included in other local plan documents. 1.9 The Core Strategy has been subject to the statutory plan preparation, examination and adoption processes as outlined below. - 2 - Selby District Core Strategy – October 2013 __________________________________________________________________ Figure 2 Selby District Core Strategy Process MAY 2006 Issues and Options Stage Public Consultation identifying key issues.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document
    • Herefordshire O Council Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document April 2008 0 0 hfdscouncil herefordshire.gov.uk Contents Page Summary 1 Part 1 Context 5 1.1 Purpose of Supplementary Planning Document 5 1.2 Consultation 5 1.3 Definitions and Purpose of Planning Obligations 6 1.4 Types and Use of Planning Obligations 6 1.5 Grampian Conditions 7 1.6 Planning Policy Context 7 1.7 Council Priorities 8 1.8 Community Involvement in Pre-Application Consultation 9 1.9 Sustainability Appraisal 9 Part 2 Code Of Practice 10 2.1 The Council’s Approach 10 2.2 Procedure for Negotiating a Planning Obligation 10 2.3 Monitoring 12 2.4 Development Viability 12 2.5 Management 12 Part 3 Community Infrastructure 15 3.1 Accessibility, Transport and Movement 15 3.2 Affordable Housing See Affordable Housing SPD 2021 20 3.3 Biodiversity 24 3.4 Community Services 26 3.5 Children and Young People 29 3.6 Flood Risk Management, Water Services and Pollution Control 33 3.7 Heritage and Archaeology 34 3.8 Landscape 35 3.9 Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities 36 3.10 Town Centres, Community Safety and Public Realm 42 3.11 Waste Reduction and Recycling 45 Appendices 46 1 UDP Policies 46 2 Average Occupancy per Dwelling 47 3 Employee/Floorspace Ratios 48 4 Costs of Providing CCTV 49 Figures S1 Thresholds for Planning Obligations 1 S2 Summary Table of Planning Obligations 4 1 Procedure for Negotiating, Preparing and Completing a Planning Obligation 14 2 Example of Transport Contributions 18 3 Transport Accessibility Zones 19 4 Commuted Payments for
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkby Wharfe SSSI
    County: North Yorkshire Site Name: Kirkby Wharfe Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981. Local Planning Authority: Selby District Council National Grid Reference: SE 510400 Ordnance Survey Sheets 1:50,000: 105 1:10,000: SE 53 NW, 54 SW Area: 21.7 (ha) 53.7 (ac) First Notified: 1984 Description: Kirkby Wharfe is an area of floodland in the valley of Dorts Dike, a tributary of the River Wharfe. Low-lying land adjacent to the dyke supports a rich marshland flora, which is in part hay cropped and in part cattle-grazed and at the higher margins there is drier neutral grassland. The site also contains an osier bed which is still in active production. The marshland communities are dominated either by sedges and rushes, typically common sedge Carex nigra, brown sedge C. disticha, jointed rush Juncus articulatus and hard rush J. inflexus, or by grasses such as reed sweet-grass Glyceria maxima and reed canary-grass Phalaris arundinacea. Both are herb-rich with an abundance of meadowsweet Filipendula ulmaria and creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens, as well as a number of other species such as marsh marigold Caltha palustris, tubular water-dropwort Oenanthe fistulosa, water horsetail Equisetum fluviatile and common marsh bedstraw Galium palustre. The osier bed has a rich ground flora dominated by meadowsweet, and also contains great willowherb Epilobium hirsutum, yellow iris Iris pseudacorus and common meadow-rue Thalictrum flavum. Areas of drier neutral grassland at the margin of the floodland are dominated by red fescue Festuca rubra with herbs such as great burnet Sanguisorba officinalis, salad burnet S.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 P
    North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 PLANNING APPLICATION ACCOMPANIED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE VARIATION OF CONDITION NO’S 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 OF PLANNING PERMISSION REF. NO. C8/2013/0677/CPO ‘THE RELOCATION OF COLLIERY ACTIVITIES AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENERGY CENTRE TO RECOVER ENERGY FROM WASTE WITH ANCILLARY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING OFFICES AND UTILITY USES (E.G. WORKSHOPS AND ELECTRICAL ROOMS); PARKING; A NEW ACCESS POINT AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING ACCESS; INTERNAL ROADS; RAILWAY SIDINGS; A WEIGHBRIDGE AND GATEHOUSE; A SUBSTATION AND TRANSFORMER COMPOUND; A NATIONAL GRID CONNECTION; PRIVATE WIRE CONNECTION TO THE COLLIERY; SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; LIGHTING; CCTV; LANDSCAPING AND FENCING ON LAND AT KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVER’S LANE, KNOTTINGLEY, WEST YORKSHIRE, WF11 8DT.’ THE PROPOSED VARIATIONS RELATE TO:- INCREASING THE CONSENTED ANNUAL THROUGHPUT OF WASTE AT THE ENERGY CENTRE, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENERGY CENTRE, CHANGES TO ASPECTS OF THE CONSENTED DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE PLANT SELECTION INCLUDING CHANGES TO THE TURBINE HALL, BOILER HALL, FGT PLANT AND ACC UNIT, AND CHANGES TO THE CONSENTED CONSTRUCTION PHASING TO INCLUDE THE USE OF THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY ACCESS ON LAND AT LAND AT THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVERS LANE, KELLINGLEY, SELBY, WF11 8DT ON BEHALF OF PEEL ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED (SELBY DISTRICT) (OSGOLDCROSS, MID SELBY, SOUTH SELBY ELECTORAL DIVISION) Report of the Corporate Director – Business and Environmental Services 1.0 Purpose of the report 1.1 To determine a planning application accompanied by an Environmental Statement for the purposes of the variation of condition no’s 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 of planning permission ref.
    [Show full text]
  • K45: Full Chain Public and Stakeholder Engagement Commercial; Project Management
    January 2016 K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement Commercial; Project Management K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement IMPORTANT NOTICE The information provided further to UK CCS Commercialisation Programme (the Competition) set out herein (the Information) has been prepared by Capture Power Limited and its sub-contractors (the Consortium) solely for the Department of Energy and Climate Change in connection with the Competition. The Information does not amount to advice on CCS technology or any CCS engineering, commercial, financial, regulatory, legal or other solutions on which any reliance should be placed. Accordingly, no member of the Consortium makes (and the UK Government does not make) any representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the Information and no reliance may be placed on the Information. In so far as permitted by law, no member of the Consortium or any company in the same group as any member of the Consortium or their respective officers, employees or agents accepts (and the UK Government does not accept) any responsibility or liability of any kind, whether for negligence or any other reason, for any damage or loss arising from any use of or any reliance placed on the Information or any subsequent communication of the Information. Each person to whom the Information is made available must make their own independent assessment of the Information after making such investigation and taking professional technical, engineering, commercial, regulatory, financial, legal or other advice, as they deem necessary. The contents of this report draw on work partly funded under the European Union’s European Energy Programme for Recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulation Assessment Scoping Report
    Hambleton District Council Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report January 2016 Summary The Habitats Directive1 seeks to protect the integrity of Natura 2000 sites and requires a Habitats Regulations Assessment to be undertaken to assess the implications of the plan or project on Natura 2000 sites, which includes Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA) and RAMSAR sites. The key principle is to adopt the precautionary approach and to preserve the integrity of sites. The sites identified for inclusion in the assessment are: SAC North York Moors Strensall Common River Derwent North Pennine Moors North Pennine Dales Meadows SPA North York Moors North Pennine Moors Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast Ramsar Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast The Hambleton Local Plan will allocate land for housing and commercial development to meet the growth of the District up to 2035. Introduction 1 The Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/34/EEC) Requirement to carry out an assessment under the Habitats Regulations Articles 6 (3) and 6 (4) of the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/43/EEC) require an assessment to be undertaken for plans and projects that are likely to have a significant effect, alone or in combination with other plans and projects, on one or more European sites (Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation). Article 6(3) states: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Adur District Council
    Overview and Scrutiny Committee 14th January 2010 Agenda Item: Ward: All Key Changes to the Emerging Core Strategy Report by the Executive Head of Planning Regeneration and Wellbeing 1.0 Summary 1.1 The Core Strategy is the key element of the Local Development Framework as it will guide future development in the borough until 2026. The final stages of the preparation of the Core Strategy are being reached prior to it being submitted to the Secretary of State for formal examination. This report advises Members of the key changes that will be been made to the document, and the reasons for them, since the Revised Core Strategy document was published for consultation in June 2009. The report then sets out the next steps toward submission, examination and adoption. 2.0 Background 2.1 When adopted, the Core Strategy will set the overall vision and planning policy framework for the town to 2026. It will set out what we want to achieve in different areas of the borough and how we will go about doing it. It will also provide the context for all subsequent Local Development Documents and their policies. When preparing this pivotal planning document the Council must maintain consistency with national and regional planning guidance and take into account the views of the community and stakeholders. 2.2 A significant amount of work to progress the Core Strategy has already been undertaken. In October 2007 the Council did prepare a Submission version of the Core Strategy. At that time, it was then expected that a public examination of the document would take place in early 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Core Strategy (Pre-Submission)
    Contents Draft Core Strategy (Pre-Submission) 1. Introduction and Context 4 2. Spatial Vision, Objectives and 12 Development Strategy 3. Overarching Principles 32 4. Harrow & Wealdstone Intensification 46 Area 5. Harrow-on-the-Hill and Sudbury Hill 56 6. South Harrow 64 7. Rayners Lane & North Harrow 70 8. Pinner & Hatch End 78 9. Stanmore & Harrow Weald 86 10. Edgware & Burnt Oak 94 11. Kingsbury & Queensbury 100 12. Kenton & Belmont Circle 106 13. Delivery Mechanisms 110 1. Where to Make Representations on 118 the Core Strategy 2. Guidance on Making 122 Representations 3. Housing Trajectory 128 Contents Draft Core Strategy (Pre-Submission) 4. Schedule of Superseded, Deleted 130 and Saved UDP Policies 5. Glossary 132 Introduction and Context 1 Draft Core Strategy (Pre-Submission) 3 1 Introduction and Context Draft Core Strategy (Pre-Submission) 1 Introduction and Context What is the Local Development Framework? 1.1 The Harrow LDF is a portfolio of separate planning policy documents that are being prepared by the Council to plan for and manage development and the use of land in the Borough over the next 15 years. When adopted, the LDF will replace the adopted Harrow Unitary Development Plan (2004) and will be used to guide development within the Borough and to determine individual planning applications. 1.2 The Core Strategy (this document) is the most important document within the Harrow LDF. It sets out the long term vision of how Harrow, and the places within it, should develop by 2026 and sets out Council's strategy for how we will achieve that vision.
    [Show full text]
  • CEF - Covid-19 Community Group Support Funding September 2020
    CEF - Covid-19 Community Group Support Funding September 2020 Offering financial assistance to local volunteer groups and networks who are responding to and recovering from the Covid-19 crisis. Please note the funding should only be used for such associated costs. Aim of the funding The aim of The CEF Covid-19 community support funding is to provide a ‘community float’. This will enable local voluntary groups to access financial assistance to support their activities that help communities to connect again. How do community networks access the funding? The funding is held by the Community Support Organisations (CSO) to administer on behalf of Selby District Council. The CSO will be responsible for coordinating and supporting a network of local voluntary community groups. Under this agreement the CSO will agree a simple payment system with each group across the CSOs network can access the fund. Each group that receives funding will need to produce proof of expenditure (i.e. receipts/invoices.) What expenditure is eligible? The funding can be used flexibly to enable groups to operate smoothly without financial barriers. How the funding has been used will be reviewed / discussed at each reporting stage but it is reasonable to conclude that this is likely to be: . Volunteer expenses (might be mileage, refreshments) in relation to covid-19 response/recovery activity . PPE (gloves, sanitisers etc) . Cleaning/sanitary equipment/items . Administrative/marketing supplies (printing, stamps, stationary etc) . Equipment to enable delivery of services (i.e. phone credit, games, social distance signage) What is not eligible? . Personal payments or financial assistance of any kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Casualties – Selby 2016 Annual Report
    Reported Road Casualties in North Yorkshire: Annual Report 2016 Selby district (Area 7) Selby district in brief Two adult were killed on Selby’s roads during 2016, this is the second lowest number of people killed on Selby’s roads since modern records began in 1990. In 2015 1 adult was killed on Selby’s roads. The 2 people killed in 2016 were a pedestrian and a PTW rider. The number of people killed or seriously injured (KSI) was 48 in 2016 and had increased from 36 in 2015. In terms of road user groups, the number of KSI has increased amongst car occupants (+10), goods vehicles (+1), pedestrians (+1), P2W (+1) and other category stayed the same at 0.There was a decrease in the number of pedal cyclists (-1). The number of total casualties in road collisions reported to the police in 2016 was 244, down 2% on 2015 (250). This decrease is mainly due to the pedal cyclist group which saw a decrease in casualties in 2016 (from 35 to 24). The goods vehicle group also saw an overall decrease from 18 to 9 and the other groups reduced from 3 to 2. The car occupant saw increases from 144 to 158 and PTW groups from 36 to 37. The reported number of child KSI casualties (aged 0-15) in the district in 2016 (0) is below the previous year (1) and the lowest year since modern records began. The number of cyclist casualties has decreased by 31% from 35 in 2015 to 24 in 2016. Child cyclist casualties (3) have decreased by 2 from the previous year (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Accountability Meeting
    Public Accountability Meeting Public Questions – Local Priorities (27 February 2018) Questions asked by the public about policing matters in their local area have been answered by Julia Mulligan, your elected Police and Crime Commissioner. Questions and answers are grouped by area as per the meeting. We have grouped similar issues within those sections so that you can see what others are asking and how we have responded to them, and then alphabetically by surname. County Command (Harrogate, Craven, Richmondshire and Hambleton) Concern: Low level crime and anti-social behaviour Question from Richard Christian, BluSkills Ltd “Do you feel that the community’s concerns regarding anti-social behaviour are as a result of a draw down in Police and PCSO presence on the street, with Police moving to vehicle bourne reactive tactics instead of community policing and foot/bike patrols? Do you see this as an issue and are you looking to address it? “I see many early teen aged groups loitering in kids play areas and on the streets. Most of these areas are poorly lit and offer cover for smoking of recreational drugs and alcohol. How are you working with local authorities as part of a prevent strategy to create dedicated spaces and activities for the younger generations to enjoy positively rather than turning to anti-social behaviour and is there a desire to light areas which currently offer a safe haven for drug taking.” Answer: A central part of my role as Commissioner is to be the voice of the public, and I have made it clear through the ‘Reinforcing Local Policing’ priority in the Police and Crime Plan that local policing remains important to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 12 February, 1924. 1283
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 12 FEBRUARY, 1924. 1283 7. An Area comprising: — Norton, Askern, Sutton, Burghwallis, Skel- . The county of Lancaster including all brooke, and Campsall. county and other boroughs therein (but ex- cluding the county boroughs of Barrow in 9. An Area comprising:— Furness, and Burnley, the boroughs of Lan- In, the* Westi Riding of Yorkshire. caster, Morecombe, CUfheroe, Colne, and The parishes of Wales, and Harthill with Nelson, and the petty sessional divisions o/ Woodall, and Colne, Burnley, Hawkshead, North LonsdaLe, Hornby, and South Lonsdale (except 'the In the county of Derby. parishes of Cockerham, Cockersand Abbey, The parishes of Killamarsh, Brighton, and Thurnham), and the parishes of Twiston, Eckington, Staveley, and Barlborough. Downham, Choitfourn, Worston, Mearley, Pendleton, Wiswell, Whalley, and Little 10. An Area comprising:— Mitton, Hen-thorn and Coldcoats). The administrative counties of Leicester, Stafford (except such portions as lie to> the In the West Riding of Yorkshire^. North and West of th& railway from Market- The county boroughs of Leeds, Bradford, Dray ton to Audley Lines Junction], and Wor- Halifax, Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Wakefield, cester (except the petty sessional division of and Barnsley, Tenbury). The boroughs of Pudsey, Todmorden, Brig- In the administrative county of Salop. house, Morley, Batley, and Ossett. The petty sessional divisions of Newport, The petty sessional divisions of Wetherby. Wellington and Shifnal; such portions of the Tadcaster, Upper Barkston Ash (except its petty sessional division of Drayton as lie to •detached parts and the parish of Brotherton), the east of the Railway from Wellington via Skyrack, Lower Agbrigg, Upper- Agbrigg, Market Drayton to Stoke-on-Trent, and the Saddleworth, Dewsbury, West Morley, Bast parish of Kinlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]