DOCSLIB.ORG

The London Gazette, 12 February, 1924. 1283

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London Gazette, 12 February, 1924. 1283 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 12 FEBRUARY, 1924. 1283 7. An Area comprising: — Norton, Askern, Sutton, Burghwallis, Skel- . The county of Lancaster including all brooke, and Campsall. county and other boroughs therein (but ex- cluding the county boroughs of Barrow in 9. An Area comprising:— Furness, and Burnley, the boroughs of Lan- In, the* Westi Riding of Yorkshire. caster, Morecombe, CUfheroe, Colne, and The parishes of Wales, and Harthill with Nelson, and the petty sessional divisions o/ Woodall, and Colne, Burnley, Hawkshead, North LonsdaLe, Hornby, and South Lonsdale (except 'the In the county of Derby. parishes of Cockerham, Cockersand Abbey, The parishes of Killamarsh, Brighton, and Thurnham), and the parishes of Twiston, Eckington, Staveley, and Barlborough. Downham, Choitfourn, Worston, Mearley, Pendleton, Wiswell, Whalley, and Little 10. An Area comprising:— Mitton, Hen-thorn and Coldcoats). The administrative counties of Leicester, Stafford (except such portions as lie to> the In the West Riding of Yorkshire^. North and West of th& railway from Market- The county boroughs of Leeds, Bradford, Dray ton to Audley Lines Junction], and Wor- Halifax, Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Wakefield, cester (except the petty sessional division of and Barnsley, Tenbury). The boroughs of Pudsey, Todmorden, Brig- In the administrative county of Salop. house, Morley, Batley, and Ossett. The petty sessional divisions of Newport, The petty sessional divisions of Wetherby. Wellington and Shifnal; such portions of the Tadcaster, Upper Barkston Ash (except its petty sessional division of Drayton as lie to •detached parts and the parish of Brotherton), the east of the Railway from Wellington via Skyrack, Lower Agbrigg, Upper- Agbrigg, Market Drayton to Stoke-on-Trent, and the Saddleworth, Dewsbury, West Morley, Bast parish of Kinlet. Morley and Todmorden. Such portion of the petty sessional division In the administrative county of Nottingham. of Eastern Ainsty as lies to the south of the The borough of Mansfield; railway from Harrogate to York and to the The petty sessional divisions of Mansfield west of the railway from York to Selby. (except the parishes of CUpstone, Warsop, and The Castleford sub-division of the petty Sookholme), Southwell, Nottingham, and sessional division of Upper Osgoldcross. Bingham, and ' The detached part of the petty sessional The parishes of Ruff or d, Kelham, Averham, division of Lower Barkston Ash; and Staythorpe, West Newark, Hawton, Farndon, The parishes of. Baildon, Hawksworth, Rolleston, Thorpe, East Stoke, Elston, Syer- Menston, Esholt, Yeadon, Guiseley, Carlton, ston, Sibthorpe, Shelton, Flawborough, Alver- Bramhope, Arthington, Castley, Weeton, ton, Kilvington, Staunton and Gotham. Ryther cum Ossendyke, Cawood, Notton, In the administrative county of Derby. Eoyston, Carlton, Monk Bretton, Ardsley, Worsborough, Stainborough, Dodworth, Selk- The petty sessional divisions of Ashbourne, stone, Cawthorne, Barugh, Darton, Woolley, Belper, Ilkeston, Appletree (Sudbury), Rep- Kexborough, High Hoyland, Clayton West, ton, Swadlincote and Derby, and the Wirks- and Skelmanthorpe. worth sub-division of the petty sessional division of Wirksworth. In the county of Derby. In the administrative county of Northampton. The borough of Glossop, The petty sessional division of Little The petty sessional division of Glossop, and Bowden,, The parishes of Hayfield, Mellor, New Such part of the petty sessional division of Mills, Newtown, Chinby, Bugsworth, and Daventry as lies to the north of the railway Brownside, Chapel-en-le-Frith, and Fernilee; from Northampton to Rugby, and In the county of Chester. The parishes of Lamport, Hanging Hough- The boroughs of Macclesfield, Hyde, Dukin- ton, Cottesbrooke, Teeton, Great Creaton, field, and Stalybridge. Spratton, Holdenby, East Haddon, Ravens- thorpe, Hollowell, Coton, Guilsborough, The petty sessional divisions of Dukinfield, Thornby, and Cold Ashby. Stockport, and Altrincham; and The parishes of Crowley, Woodford, Newton, In the administrative county of Warwick. Mottram St. Andrew, Butley, Prestbury, The boroughs of Nuneaton and Sutton Cold- Tytherington, Upton. Fallibroome, Gaws- field, worth, Bosley, Sutton, Wincle, Wildboar- The petty sessional divisions of Wilnecote, clough, Macolesfield, Forest, Eainow, Hurds- Atherstone, Nuneaton, Coleshill, Solihull, field, Bollington, Kettleshulme, Lyme Hand- Coventry, Rugby (except the parish of Wil- ley, Pott. Shrigley, Adlington, and Poynton loughby), Henley in Arden and Alcester, and 'with Worth; The parishes of Aston Cantlow, Bickmarsh, And also comprising: — Whitchurch, llmuigton, and Stretton on Fosse. The county borough of Stockport. In the administrative county of Gloucester. 8. An Area in the West Riding of Yorkshire The boroughs of Tewkesbury and Chelten- comprising the parishes of Kirk Smeaton, ham; B 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • English Heritage / Heritage at Risk Register 2013
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2013 / YORKSHIRE Contents HERITAGE AT RISK III THE REGISTER VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register VIII Reducing the risks X Publications and guidance XIII Key to the entries XV Entries on the Register by local planning authority XVIII Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 26 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 27 North Lincolnshire (UA) 28 North Yorkshire 31 Craven 31 Hambleton 32 Harrogate 35 North York Moors (NP) 40 Richmondshire 55 Ryedale 58 Scarborough 77 Selby 80 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 85 South Yorkshire 87 Barnsley 87 Doncaster 90 Peak District (NP) 94 Rotherham 94 Sheffield 98 West Yorkshire 101 Bradford 101 Calderdale 106 Kirklees 110 Leeds 115 Wakefield 121 York (UA) 124 II Heritage at Risk is our campaign to save listed buildings and important historic sites, places and landmarks from neglect or decay. At its heart is the Heritage at Risk Register, an online database containing details of each site known to be at risk. It is analysed and updated annually and this leaflet summarises the results. Each of our nine local offices now hosts a dedicated Heritage at Risk team, delivering national expertise locally. The good news is that we are on target to save 25% (1,137) of the sites that were on the Register in 2010 by 2015. From the historic battlefield at Towton to ancient barrows on the Wolds, this success is down to good partnerships with owners, developers, the Heritage Lottery Fund, Natural England, councils and local groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / Yorkshire and the Humber
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 16 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 41 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 44 South Yorkshire 106 West Yorkshire 117 York (UA) 130 The Heritage at Risk Register helps us to identify the most threatened buildings, archaeological sites and landscapes in this most distinctive of English regions. For the 60% of listed buildings on this year’s Register that could have a sustainable future through commercial or residential reuse, the economic downturn has brought additional challenges to which we must now respond. This year, we undertook a pioneering 15% sample survey of England’s 14,500 listed places of worship to help us understand the condition of the thousands of designated churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques and temples and other faith buildings that are the spiritual focus for our communities. They face many different kinds of challenges and we need to ensure their future. In response to the expansion of asset types and changed Last year we included conservation areas in the Register economic conditions we have developed a new strategy. for the first time. This year, 46 of these, including Haworth, From now on we will focus our resources on types of Holbeck and Rotherham, are known to be at risk, site that make a particular contribution to the region’s but the survey of nearly 800 areas is proving a challenging character.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Selby District Council Election of Parish Councillors for the parishes listed below Number of Councillors to Parish be elected Acaster Selby One Appleton Roebuck Seven Balne Five Barkston Ash Seven Barlby (Bridge) Two Barlby (Osgodby) Two Barlby (Village) Seven Barlow Seven Beal Seven Biggin Five Bilbrough Seven Bolton Percy Three Brayton Twelve Brotherton Seven Burn Eight Burton Salmon Seven Byram Cum Sutton Eight Camblesforth Seven Carlton Nine Catterton One Cawood Nine Chapel Haddlesey Six Church Fenton Seven Cliffe Nine Colton Two Cridling Stubbs Five Drax Six Eggborough Seven Escrick Eleven Fairburn Seven Gateforth Seven Grimston One Hambleton Eight Healaugh Four Heck Five Hemingbrough Eleven Hensall Seven Hillam Seven Hirst Courtney Seven Kelfield Seven Kellington Seven Kirk Smeaton Five Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Doncaster Road, SELBY, YO8 9FT Kirkby Wharfe with North Milford Two Little Smeaton Five Long Drax Six Monk Fryston Seven Newland Five Newton Kyme Cum Toulston Seven North Duffield Nine Riccall Eleven Ryther Cum Ossendyke Five Saxton Cum Scarthingwell Six Selby (North) Five Selby (South) Six Selby (West) Six Selby St James One Sherburn in Elmet Twelve Skipwith Seven South Milford Nine Steeton One Stillingfleet Nine Stutton with Hazlewood Five Tadcaster (East) Five Tadcaster (West) Seven Thorganby Nine Thorpe Willoughby Ten Towton Four Ulleskelf Seven Whitley Seven Wistow Seven Womersley Seven 1. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer at Civic Centre, Doncaster Road, SELBY, YO8 9FT between 9.00am and 5.00pm on any working day from the date of publication of this notice (excluding bank holidays) but no later than 4pm on Wednesday, 3rd April 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Rnp Approaches Further Consultation
    INTRODUCTION OF RNP APPROACHES FURTHER CONSULTATION v2.1 Leeds East Airport is proud of its relationship with the local community and stakeholders, and is committed to being a responsible neighbour. The purpose of this document is to ensure you have an opportunity to participate in this important consultation about the proposed introduction of new instrument approach procedures at the airport as we want to hear your views. These procedures will provide satellite guidance to some aircraft approaching runways 06 and 24, increasing safety and operational flexibility. FOREWORD There have been two previous consultations on these new routes in 2017 and 2019. The designs have been updated following the feedback received and this consultation presents the updated designs. Your opinions regarding the proposals set out within this document and your general feedback are important to us, and we encourage you to respond, whether you have positive, neutral or negative views on the proposal. The consultation runs for 12 weeks from 18 February to 13 May 2021 and details of how to respond are given at the end of this document. We encourage you to submit your comments as soon as possible. We will also hold an online workshop during the consultation on 14 April 1000 – 1200. Joining details will be sent out in advance to all consultees. Leeds East Airport INTRODUCTION PROPOSED CHANGE RNP APPROACHES Leeds East Airport (LEA) is seeking to introduce instrument approach The IAPs to be introduced are RNP (Required Navigation Performance) procedures (IAPs) to two of its runways. These approaches are intended to approaches which rely on Global Navigation Satellite System.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
    Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Development Plan
    www.selby.gov.uk/cefs https://www.selby.gov.uk/cefs-register-updates To sign up to the Eastern CEF mailing list please go to; to; go please list mailing CEF Eastern the to up sign To CEF Area CEF Southern and community cafes. community and development, health and welfare projects, activity classes classes activity projects, welfare and health development, We have had many successes in particular Youth Youth particular in successes many had have We CEF Area CEF their area. their Western organisations and Parish Councils wish to progress within within progress to wish Councils Parish and organisations Projects and improvements that community groups, local local groups, community that improvements and Projects partnership board to concentrate its efforts on the Issues, Issues, the on efforts its concentrate to board partnership The Community Development Plan (CDP) allows the CEF CEF the allows (CDP) Plan Development Community The directly to these people. these to directly are at these meetings. The Forum is a chance to speak speak to chance a is Forum The meetings. these at are Ward where you live. The people who deliver your local services services local your deliver who people The live. you where Hemingbrough any concerns or make a comment about what’s happening happening what’s about comment a make or concerns any Cliffe We hold regular public meetings at which you can raise raise can you which at meetings public regular hold We Osgodby Biggin Little Fenton Little Ward would like and need. and like would Barlby Wistow Ward Wistow community to create the environment and services they they services and environment the create to community Cawood with Cawood Our aim is to encourage, assist and empower the local local the empower and assist encourage, to is aim Our Church Fenton Church Ward along with community activists.
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCH FENTON AIRBASE POLICY CONTEXT a Supporting Document for the Ulleskelf Neighbourhood Development Plan
    CHURCH FENTON AIRBASE POLICY CONTEXT A supporting document for the Ulleskelf Neighbourhood Development Plan October 18th 2017 Prepared for Ulleskelf Parish Council by: CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT 2 Planning Policy Context Previously Developed Land Detailed Planning Context 3. HERITAGE CONTEXT 5 Built Heritage Natural Heritage 4. SERVICE PROVISION CONTEXT 5 Busk Lane Residents Company Ulla Green Residents Association Church Fenton Residents Company Limited 5. LANDOWNER PERSPECTIVES 6 Land within Development Limits Land outside Development Limits 6. LOCAL COMMUNITY NEEDS 7 Questionnaire Survey APPENDICES 10 Appendix 1: Selby District Local Plan Policies 10 Appendix 2: Selby Core Strategy Policies 15 Appendix 3: Airfield Scheduled Monument 23 Appendix 4: Selby District Council PDL Letter 28 Appendix 5: Questionnaire Survey 30 MAPS 37 Map 1: Selby District Local Plan Policies 37 Map 2: Detailed Planning Context - Residential 38 Map 3: Area of Airbase covered by Temporary Employment Consent 39 Map 4: Natural Heritage 40` Map 5: Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) 41 1 1. INTRODUCTION This report, commissioned by the Ulleskelf Neighbourhood Plan steering group, sets out the context for the development of planning policies and proposals, together with community actions and projects, within the Ulleskelf Neighbourhood Development Plan (UNDP) in relation to the former RAF Church Fenton airbase, the large majority of which is located in Ulleskelf’s Neighbourhood Area. The report is broken down as follows:- • Local planning context – covering planning policy and detailed planning provisions; • Heritage context – covering both the built and natural environment; • Service Provision context – covering the different management arrangements pertaining to the base’s three existing residential areas; • Landowner perspectives – covering owners of the airbase and adjacent land; • Local community needs – based on a local questionnaire survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Make the Most of Selby Park
    Summer 2012 Make the most of Selby Park Now is the ideal time to visit Selby’s biggest and most popular park – Selby Park in the heart of the town. It’s easy to forget that a day at areas for the kids, crazy golf and The Park also has an Annual Park the park can keep the whole bowling are just the start of it. As Open Day every July – a fantastic family entertained without well as offering ice creams, tea, free day out for all the family. costing you a fortune. coffee and snacks, the Pavilion Selby Park is maintained by The busy park, near Selby Abbey also hosts bingo sessions. WLCT as part of a deal with covers five acres and offers Don’t forget that over the Selby District Council to deliver something for everyone. Play summer months, the play area leisure services. adjacent to the pavilion offers toys suitable for younger children and a bouncy castle. Make sure you keep an eye out INSIDE for posters advertising regular Find out about: music concerts by local and regional bands. The latest work of your Community Officers Welcome to the summer issue of The Police your Open Door newsletter. Operation Tornado This newsletter gives you a chance to get local information, the latest news on our services and gives Recent changes you all the important contact details you might need, to the benefits all in one place. system Don’t forget, if you would like to receive future issues of Open Door by email, rather High speed than through the post, please let us know.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Options Local Plan Selby District Council
    v Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation 2021 Preferred Options Local Plan Selby District Council Contents Preferred Options Local Plan 1 Foreword 4 Introduction 2 Introduction and Background 5 Part 1 - Vision and Objectives 3 Part 1 - Vision and Objectives 16 Part 2 - Preferred Development Policies 4 Spatial Growth Strategy 31 5 Supporting a Diverse Local Economy and Thriving Town Centres 58 6 Providing the Right Infrastructure To Support Local Communities 77 7 Creating High Quality Places to Live 90 8 Maintaining a High Quality Natural Environment 122 Part 3 - New Settlement Proposals 9 New Settlement Proposals 150 Part 4 - Council's Preferred Allocations 10 Introduction 159 11 Appleton Roebuck 160 12 Barlby & Osgodby 163 13 Brayton 170 14 Camblesforth 177 15 Carlton 180 Selby District Council Preferred Options Local Plan Contents 16 Cliffe 183 17 Eggborough & Whitley 188 18 Hambleton 193 19 Hemingbrough 196 20 Hensall 204 21 Kellington 209 22 Monk Fryston & Hillam 214 23 Newthorpe 217 24 North Duffield 220 25 Riccall 226 26 Selby 229 27 Sherburn in Elmet 244 28 Tadcaster 251 29 Thorpe Willoughby 274 30 Ulleskelf 281 Part 5- Rejected Sites 31 Rejected Sites 284 Appendix A List of Residential Planning Permissions 32 List of Residential Planning Permissions 303 Appendix B Glossary 33 Glossary 320 Preferred Options Local Plan Selby District Council Contents Appendix C Monitoring 34 Monitoring 325 4 Selby District Council Preferred Options Local Plan Preferred Options Local Plan 1 Foreword 1.1 To be inserted Preferred Options Local Plan Selby District Council 5 Preferred Options Local Plan 2 Introduction and Background About this Consultation 2.1 This consultation document sets out the Council's preferred approach to development growth in the District up to 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan
    Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Adoption Version 22 October 2013 Copies of the accompanying evidence base including the Sustainability Appraisal Report and Background Papers can also be viewed on our website You may get further help from the Policy Team at: Selby District Council, Doncaster Road, Selby YO8 9FT [email protected] 01757 292034 01757 292229 If you require any further help or advice or if you need this document in a different format, for example large print, audio, Braille or in another language, please contact the Policy Team on (01757) 292034 or email [email protected] The Status of Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 At the time of ‘Publication’ of the Submission Draft Core Strategy (SDCS), the Development Plan for Selby District comprised the Regional Spatial Strategy (the Yorkshire and Humber Plan or RS), and ‘Saved’ Local Plan policies, namely Selby District Local Plan, North Yorkshire Minerals Local Plan and North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan. The Core Strategy is the first development plan document prepared by the Council as part of its new Local Development Framework (Local Plan). On adoption it replaces a number of the ‘Saved’ Selby District Local Plan policies1. On 6 July 2010 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced the revocation of RS with immediate effect. As a result of the Secretary of State’s revocation decision, the Council reviewed the Core Strategy and the evidence base on which it is founded, and came to the conclusion that while the policies and context provided by RS were no longer applicable, the RS evidence base remains robust and relevant, particularly since the RS evidence had been subject to a process of consultation and Examination.
    [Show full text]