Make the Most of Selby Park
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
K45: Full Chain Public and Stakeholder Engagement Commercial; Project Management
January 2016 K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement Commercial; Project Management K45: Full chain public and stakeholder engagement IMPORTANT NOTICE The information provided further to UK CCS Commercialisation Programme (the Competition) set out herein (the Information) has been prepared by Capture Power Limited and its sub-contractors (the Consortium) solely for the Department of Energy and Climate Change in connection with the Competition. The Information does not amount to advice on CCS technology or any CCS engineering, commercial, financial, regulatory, legal or other solutions on which any reliance should be placed. Accordingly, no member of the Consortium makes (and the UK Government does not make) any representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the Information and no reliance may be placed on the Information. In so far as permitted by law, no member of the Consortium or any company in the same group as any member of the Consortium or their respective officers, employees or agents accepts (and the UK Government does not accept) any responsibility or liability of any kind, whether for negligence or any other reason, for any damage or loss arising from any use of or any reliance placed on the Information or any subsequent communication of the Information. Each person to whom the Information is made available must make their own independent assessment of the Information after making such investigation and taking professional technical, engineering, commercial, regulatory, financial, legal or other advice, as they deem necessary. The contents of this report draw on work partly funded under the European Union’s European Energy Programme for Recovery. -
Habitats Regulation Assessment Scoping Report
Hambleton District Council Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report January 2016 Summary The Habitats Directive1 seeks to protect the integrity of Natura 2000 sites and requires a Habitats Regulations Assessment to be undertaken to assess the implications of the plan or project on Natura 2000 sites, which includes Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA) and RAMSAR sites. The key principle is to adopt the precautionary approach and to preserve the integrity of sites. The sites identified for inclusion in the assessment are: SAC North York Moors Strensall Common River Derwent North Pennine Moors North Pennine Dales Meadows SPA North York Moors North Pennine Moors Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast Ramsar Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast The Hambleton Local Plan will allocate land for housing and commercial development to meet the growth of the District up to 2035. Introduction 1 The Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/34/EEC) Requirement to carry out an assessment under the Habitats Regulations Articles 6 (3) and 6 (4) of the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) (Directive 92/43/EEC) require an assessment to be undertaken for plans and projects that are likely to have a significant effect, alone or in combination with other plans and projects, on one or more European sites (Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation). Article 6(3) states: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives. -
Public Accountability Meeting
Public Accountability Meeting Public Questions – Local Priorities (27 February 2018) Questions asked by the public about policing matters in their local area have been answered by Julia Mulligan, your elected Police and Crime Commissioner. Questions and answers are grouped by area as per the meeting. We have grouped similar issues within those sections so that you can see what others are asking and how we have responded to them, and then alphabetically by surname. County Command (Harrogate, Craven, Richmondshire and Hambleton) Concern: Low level crime and anti-social behaviour Question from Richard Christian, BluSkills Ltd “Do you feel that the community’s concerns regarding anti-social behaviour are as a result of a draw down in Police and PCSO presence on the street, with Police moving to vehicle bourne reactive tactics instead of community policing and foot/bike patrols? Do you see this as an issue and are you looking to address it? “I see many early teen aged groups loitering in kids play areas and on the streets. Most of these areas are poorly lit and offer cover for smoking of recreational drugs and alcohol. How are you working with local authorities as part of a prevent strategy to create dedicated spaces and activities for the younger generations to enjoy positively rather than turning to anti-social behaviour and is there a desire to light areas which currently offer a safe haven for drug taking.” Answer: A central part of my role as Commissioner is to be the voice of the public, and I have made it clear through the ‘Reinforcing Local Policing’ priority in the Police and Crime Plan that local policing remains important to the public. -
The London Gazette, 12 February, 1924. 1283
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 12 FEBRUARY, 1924. 1283 7. An Area comprising: — Norton, Askern, Sutton, Burghwallis, Skel- . The county of Lancaster including all brooke, and Campsall. county and other boroughs therein (but ex- cluding the county boroughs of Barrow in 9. An Area comprising:— Furness, and Burnley, the boroughs of Lan- In, the* Westi Riding of Yorkshire. caster, Morecombe, CUfheroe, Colne, and The parishes of Wales, and Harthill with Nelson, and the petty sessional divisions o/ Woodall, and Colne, Burnley, Hawkshead, North LonsdaLe, Hornby, and South Lonsdale (except 'the In the county of Derby. parishes of Cockerham, Cockersand Abbey, The parishes of Killamarsh, Brighton, and Thurnham), and the parishes of Twiston, Eckington, Staveley, and Barlborough. Downham, Choitfourn, Worston, Mearley, Pendleton, Wiswell, Whalley, and Little 10. An Area comprising:— Mitton, Hen-thorn and Coldcoats). The administrative counties of Leicester, Stafford (except such portions as lie to> the In the West Riding of Yorkshire^. North and West of th& railway from Market- The county boroughs of Leeds, Bradford, Dray ton to Audley Lines Junction], and Wor- Halifax, Huddersfield, Dewsbury, Wakefield, cester (except the petty sessional division of and Barnsley, Tenbury). The boroughs of Pudsey, Todmorden, Brig- In the administrative county of Salop. house, Morley, Batley, and Ossett. The petty sessional divisions of Newport, The petty sessional divisions of Wetherby. Wellington and Shifnal; such portions of the Tadcaster, Upper Barkston Ash (except its petty sessional division of Drayton as lie to •detached parts and the parish of Brotherton), the east of the Railway from Wellington via Skyrack, Lower Agbrigg, Upper- Agbrigg, Market Drayton to Stoke-on-Trent, and the Saddleworth, Dewsbury, West Morley, Bast parish of Kinlet. -
Yorkshire and the Humber Region, Tanner Row, York Y01 6WP Telephone: 01904 601979 Fax: 01904 601999 Email: [email protected]
HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 200820 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 ContentsKey to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER HERITAGE AT RISK IN YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’. -
English Heritage / Heritage at Risk Register 2013
HERITAGE AT RISK 2013 / YORKSHIRE Contents HERITAGE AT RISK III THE REGISTER VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register VIII Reducing the risks X Publications and guidance XIII Key to the entries XV Entries on the Register by local planning authority XVIII Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 26 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 27 North Lincolnshire (UA) 28 North Yorkshire 31 Craven 31 Hambleton 32 Harrogate 35 North York Moors (NP) 40 Richmondshire 55 Ryedale 58 Scarborough 77 Selby 80 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 85 South Yorkshire 87 Barnsley 87 Doncaster 90 Peak District (NP) 94 Rotherham 94 Sheffield 98 West Yorkshire 101 Bradford 101 Calderdale 106 Kirklees 110 Leeds 115 Wakefield 121 York (UA) 124 II Heritage at Risk is our campaign to save listed buildings and important historic sites, places and landmarks from neglect or decay. At its heart is the Heritage at Risk Register, an online database containing details of each site known to be at risk. It is analysed and updated annually and this leaflet summarises the results. Each of our nine local offices now hosts a dedicated Heritage at Risk team, delivering national expertise locally. The good news is that we are on target to save 25% (1,137) of the sites that were on the Register in 2010 by 2015. From the historic battlefield at Towton to ancient barrows on the Wolds, this success is down to good partnerships with owners, developers, the Heritage Lottery Fund, Natural England, councils and local groups. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / Yorkshire and the Humber
HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 16 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 41 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 44 South Yorkshire 106 West Yorkshire 117 York (UA) 130 The Heritage at Risk Register helps us to identify the most threatened buildings, archaeological sites and landscapes in this most distinctive of English regions. For the 60% of listed buildings on this year’s Register that could have a sustainable future through commercial or residential reuse, the economic downturn has brought additional challenges to which we must now respond. This year, we undertook a pioneering 15% sample survey of England’s 14,500 listed places of worship to help us understand the condition of the thousands of designated churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques and temples and other faith buildings that are the spiritual focus for our communities. They face many different kinds of challenges and we need to ensure their future. In response to the expansion of asset types and changed Last year we included conservation areas in the Register economic conditions we have developed a new strategy. for the first time. This year, 46 of these, including Haworth, From now on we will focus our resources on types of Holbeck and Rotherham, are known to be at risk, site that make a particular contribution to the region’s but the survey of nearly 800 areas is proving a challenging character. -
Notice of Election
NOTICE OF ELECTION Selby District Council Election of Parish Councillors for the parishes listed below Number of Councillors to Parish be elected Acaster Selby One Appleton Roebuck Seven Balne Five Barkston Ash Seven Barlby (Bridge) Two Barlby (Osgodby) Two Barlby (Village) Seven Barlow Seven Beal Seven Biggin Five Bilbrough Seven Bolton Percy Three Brayton Twelve Brotherton Seven Burn Eight Burton Salmon Seven Byram Cum Sutton Eight Camblesforth Seven Carlton Nine Catterton One Cawood Nine Chapel Haddlesey Six Church Fenton Seven Cliffe Nine Colton Two Cridling Stubbs Five Drax Six Eggborough Seven Escrick Eleven Fairburn Seven Gateforth Seven Grimston One Hambleton Eight Healaugh Four Heck Five Hemingbrough Eleven Hensall Seven Hillam Seven Hirst Courtney Seven Kelfield Seven Kellington Seven Kirk Smeaton Five Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Doncaster Road, SELBY, YO8 9FT Kirkby Wharfe with North Milford Two Little Smeaton Five Long Drax Six Monk Fryston Seven Newland Five Newton Kyme Cum Toulston Seven North Duffield Nine Riccall Eleven Ryther Cum Ossendyke Five Saxton Cum Scarthingwell Six Selby (North) Five Selby (South) Six Selby (West) Six Selby St James One Sherburn in Elmet Twelve Skipwith Seven South Milford Nine Steeton One Stillingfleet Nine Stutton with Hazlewood Five Tadcaster (East) Five Tadcaster (West) Seven Thorganby Nine Thorpe Willoughby Ten Towton Four Ulleskelf Seven Whitley Seven Wistow Seven Womersley Seven 1. Nomination papers must be delivered to the Returning Officer at Civic Centre, Doncaster Road, SELBY, YO8 9FT between 9.00am and 5.00pm on any working day from the date of publication of this notice (excluding bank holidays) but no later than 4pm on Wednesday, 3rd April 2019. -
DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary
Drax DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary 70037047_PEIR_NTS JANUARY 2018 PUBLIC Drax DRAX REPOWER PROJECT Preliminary Environmental Information Report Non-Technical Summary TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70037047 OUR REF. NO. 70037047_PEIR_NTS DATE: JANUARY 2018 WSP Three White Rose Office Park Millshaw Park Lane Leeds LS11 0DL Phone: +44 113 395 6200 Fax: +44 113 395 6201 WSP.com QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Remarks Date January 2018 Prepared by Various Signature Checked by Various Signature Authorised by Chris Taylor Signature Project number 70037047 Report number File reference DRAX REPOWER PROJECT WSP Project No.: 70037047 | Our Ref No.: 70037047_PEIR_NTS January 2018 Drax CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 EIA METHODOLOGY 4 3 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 4 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES 16 5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 17 6 AIR QUALITY 19 7 NOISE AND VIBRATION 21 8 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 23 9 BIODIVERSITY 25 10 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 27 11 GROUND CONDITIONS AND CONTAMINATION 29 12 WATER RESOURCE, QUALITY AND HYDROLOGY 31 13 WASTE 33 14 SOCIO-ECONOMICS 34 15 CUMULATIVE AND COMBINED EFFECTS 36 16 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 39 17 REFERENCES 41 DRAX REPOWER PROJECT WSP Project No.: 70037047 | Our Ref No.: 70037047_PEIR_NTS January 2018 Drax Table 1 – Abbreviations Abbreviation Term in full AILs Abnormal Indivisible Loads CCGT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CHP Combined Heat and Power DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement GIS Gas Insulated Switchgear HGVs Heavy Goods Vehicles HRSG Heat Recovery Steam Generator MW Megawatts NOx Nitrogen oxides NTS Non-Technical Summary OCGT Open Cycle Gas Turbine PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Table 2 - Glossary Term Definition Combined Cycle Gas Turbine A combined cycle gas turbine is an assembly of turbines that convert heat (CCGT) into mechanical energy and works alongside HRSGs. -
Introduction of Rnp Approaches Further Consultation
INTRODUCTION OF RNP APPROACHES FURTHER CONSULTATION v2.1 Leeds East Airport is proud of its relationship with the local community and stakeholders, and is committed to being a responsible neighbour. The purpose of this document is to ensure you have an opportunity to participate in this important consultation about the proposed introduction of new instrument approach procedures at the airport as we want to hear your views. These procedures will provide satellite guidance to some aircraft approaching runways 06 and 24, increasing safety and operational flexibility. FOREWORD There have been two previous consultations on these new routes in 2017 and 2019. The designs have been updated following the feedback received and this consultation presents the updated designs. Your opinions regarding the proposals set out within this document and your general feedback are important to us, and we encourage you to respond, whether you have positive, neutral or negative views on the proposal. The consultation runs for 12 weeks from 18 February to 13 May 2021 and details of how to respond are given at the end of this document. We encourage you to submit your comments as soon as possible. We will also hold an online workshop during the consultation on 14 April 1000 – 1200. Joining details will be sent out in advance to all consultees. Leeds East Airport INTRODUCTION PROPOSED CHANGE RNP APPROACHES Leeds East Airport (LEA) is seeking to introduce instrument approach The IAPs to be introduced are RNP (Required Navigation Performance) procedures (IAPs) to two of its runways. These approaches are intended to approaches which rely on Global Navigation Satellite System. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds.