• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

JIM MASSELOS Decolonized space The reconfi guring of national and public space in India One of the great moments in the twentieth century was the achievement of independence on the Indian subcontinent. Along with independence went a reconfiguring of national space and of how it was perceived, understood, and utilized. This chapter examines some of the implications of the changes in attitudes following on the creation not of one but two nations on the subconti- nent. The discussion tracks through three terrains: the first is the transforma- tion of territorial imaginaries as a result of independence and Partition; the second is that of the streetside locality, the space inhabited by people in their daily lives before and after independence; and the last is the historicizing of a spatial past, a continuum of a rethought past provoked by new national identities. Decolonization created new national spaces that affected behav- iour and influenced perceptions in a variety of ways and in different places. The impact of the intersection between the levels, between the configuring, for instance, of street-level and national space, was variable and often limited, and thus problematizes the affects of decolonization. That the street corner continued to retain spatial integrity – a sense of separateness within increas- ingly wider city, state, and national circles of organization – much as it had done under the predecessor regime challenges notions of the pervasiveness of decolonization in bringing about encompassing and qualitative structural change. ‘When the world went topsy-turvy.’1 Decolonization did not bring any change in the physical space and to po- graphy of South Asia: the same rivers continued to flow through the same terrain past the same cities and villages. The magic moment of independence of course could not affect the physical form of the land, but it could – and did – affect how the former colonial space was categorized and perceived. In this sense, there were significant spatial changes in consequence of the 1 Manto 1987:39. Jim Masselos - 9789004260443 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 08:04:37AM via free access 190 Beyond empire and nation moment when Britain gave up its raj over the subcontinent. The free space long desired and struggled for by nationalists, the idea of the free nation’s territory that had underscored the drive for political freedom, received physical reality on the assumption of independence. Yet the transfer of power to two independent nations failed to satisfy either of the parties that had pushed for the creation of successor states: the imagined national space behind the freedom struggles did not conform to the physical realities of the partition of British India into Pakistan and India. Neither the Muslim League with its push for Pakistan received the extended territorial areas that it had at some point wanted, nor did the Indian National Congress, the leading organization of the freedom struggle, fulfil its dreams of a subcontinental India as the proper, the logical, successor nation. There was thus ambiguity and contradiction in the new national territories. Hence, while in the celebra- tions at the independence hour there was jubilation over what had been won, there was also a sense of loss, perhaps failure, even if part of what had been wanted, freedom from British political rule, had been achieved. Nehru in his ‘Tryst with destiny’ speech at the midnight hour on 15 August 1947 in parlia- ment noted that at that moment when India was achieving independence, the tryst with destiny, the pledge to obtain freedom, had eventuated – but only partially (Norman 1965, II:336-7). His underlying point was that while politi- cal independence was a reality the space of the nation had fallen short of what they had struggled for. And what had been the idea of nation behind the struggle? Nehru, who had spent much of the 1920s and 1930s travelling around India in his work for the nationalist cause, discovered during his tours an India with an underlying unity that drew from the land and was expressed through its people: Though outwardly there was diversity and infi nite variety among our people, everywhere there was that tremendous impress of oneness, which had held all of us together for ages past, whatever political fate or misfortune had befallen us. The unity of India was no longer merely an intellectual conception for me: it was an emotional experience […].2 In speeches during his tours, Nehru used the three terms India, Hindustan, and Bharata to describe the territory of which he spoke (Nehru 1946:39). He wrote that he tried to make his audiences ‘think of India as a whole’, a notion already present in their minds through popular pilgrimage circuits and the all-India spread of the settings of the great epics and myths. Nehru’s audiences sometimes greeted him with a shout, Bharat Mata ki Jai – Victory to Mother India – which gave him the opportunity to question 2 Nehru 1946:39. See also the perceptive analysis of these meetings by Pandey 1988. Jim Masselos - 9789004260443 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 08:04:37AM via free access Decolonized space 191 what they meant by Mother India. For a time during the struggle for inde- pendence Bharat Mata had been personified as a goddess whose form was that of the subcontinent. The idea had emerged prominently in the agitation against the first partition of Bengal in 1905 and remained fixed in national consciousness through the rallying song, Vande Mataram (Hail to thee, O Mother), which Congress used as a prime song of protest against the raj and to promote the idea of national unity during its satyagraha (nonviolent) cam- paigns from the 1920s. The hymn came from the nineteenth-century Bengali novelist Bankimchandra’s account of an uprising of sanyasis (Hindu holy men) and their chant as they made their way to battle. The song to the Mother celebrated the confluence of two ideas, a national space which was that of the Mother, and a national space combining with national community: it was that confluence that was used to justify demonstration, action, and battle. As Gandhi pointed out to a Bengali audience in 1927, ‘Shall we not then live up to it and sing with all our hearts and say we are sons of Mother India, not merely sons of Bengal?’3 Vande Mataram provided a lineage that justified the struggle by locating it within a continuous history of the territory of the motherland and thus extended it from Bengal to all of India to assert a meta- physic unity of belief and space (Masselos:2002). Nehru himself had a somewhat different perception of Mother India, one which brought diverse social and geographical complexity into the notion of a subcontinental entity. This is evident in his campaign through the villages of northern India for the 1937 elections. His style of electioneering was to begin by throwing questions at his audiences. When he asked them what was Mother India, someone might answer: the good earth of India; Nehru would probe: Which earth, the farm, the village, the province, all of India? Finally his audience would impatiently ask him to tell them. He answered as follows: India was all this that they had thought, but it was much more. The mountains and the rivers of India, and the forests and the broad fi elds, which gave us food, were all dear to us, but what counted ultimately were the people of India, people like them and me, who were spread out all over this vast land. Bharat Mata, Mother India, was essentially these millions of people […]. (Nehru 1946:40.) At the time of independence at that midnight hour in 1947, the territory Nehru had perceived was divided and the link between land, people, and culture broke with the creation of Pakistan and India. Later each would estab- 3 M.K. Gandhi, ‘After the Congress’, speech at Comilla, 5-1-1927, published in Young India 13- 1-1927, in Prasad 1929:30. Jim Masselos - 9789004260443 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 08:04:37AM via free access 192 Beyond empire and nation lish new linkages as part of the process of creating new national identities. But that was to be in the future.4 Before 1947 the general objective of the Indian National Congress had been to win political freedom for a nation covering the entire subcontinent. The imagined space of the nation was that of the total territory of the British raj and political freedom would apply to all of it. After 1947, however, the truncated and separated nations on the subcontinent created a reality that was not in conformity with the earlier imagined nationalist space of the Congress, nor even of the Muslim League that had wanted a larger and more extensive Pakistan. Immediately, both Congress and the League were faced with the fact of the truncation of what they had long considered national space, though for each it was different. The process of coming to terms with what they had, rather than what they had aspired to, was made even more traumatic by the surgical divi- sion of the two border provinces, Bengal and Punjab, with each divided into two parts. The division of Bengal was the less difficult. Punjab posed greater problems, given the intermixing of Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs throughout the provinces. Since the Congress and the Muslim League were unable to agree on how the provinces were to be partitioned, the task of ensuring a fair division was assigned to an independent arbiter, Cyril Radcliffe. He was to determine the precise boundary that both sides were required to accept, sight unseen.

Load more

  23

Copy Link