The Ideological Differences Between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ideological Differences Between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai 1 The Ideological Differences between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai 1885-1919 ■by Daniel Argov Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the University of London* School of Oriental and African Studies* June 1964* ProQuest Number: 11010545 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010545 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 ABSTRACT Surendranath Banerjea was typical of the 'moderates’ in the Indian National Congress while Lajpat Rai typified the 'extremists'* This thesis seeks to portray critical political biographies of Surendranath Banerjea and of Lajpat Rai within a general comparative study of the moderates and the extremists, in an analysis of political beliefs and modes of political action in the Indian national movement, 1883-1919* It attempts to mirror the attitude of mind of the two nationalist leaders against their respective backgrounds of thought and experience, hence events in Bengal and the Punjab loom larger than in other parts of India* "The Extremists of to-day will be Moderates to-morrow, just as the Moderates of to-day were the Extremists of yesterday.” Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 2 January 190? ABBREVIATIONS B.N.]T.R. Bengal Native Newspaper Reports I.N.'j, Indian National Congress i.o.: j. India Office Library Prog Proceeding(s) P.N.]T.R. Punjab Native Newspaper Reports EUR. MSS. European Manuscripts 5 « CONTENTS Page Introduction............... ............. ...... 6 Chapter I The Early Career of Surendranath Banerjea, the National Fund and the National Conference 1871-1885•••♦••* 15 Chapter II The Character and Ideas of the Indian National Congress 1885-1895.... • **# 58 Chapter III The Early Career of Lajpat Rai and the Emergence of a Rift in the Congress 1882-1902 ......... 106 Chapter IV The Ideas of the Extremists and the Surat Split 1900-1907*................ 162 Chapter V The Congress Adrift, and Captured by the Extremists 1908-1920....*♦♦* 229 Epilogue ............ 280 Bibliography 295 6 INTRODUCTION The Ilbert Bill controversy and the Anglo-Indian Defence Association gave impetus to the National Fund in Bengal, which culminated in December 1885 in the National Conference, and in December 1885 in the establishment of the Indian National Congress* During its early years, the main struggle of the Congress was & struggle for recognition by the Government# The Congress endeavoured to present an image of respectability and loyalty, and its watchwords were moderation and caution* An exclusive body of English- educated Indians, whose principle desire was to assimilate Western political institutions, the Congress kept aloof from the masses. The Congress directed its main effort towards England and pinned its hopes on the Liberal party* It justified its requests for Indian representation in the British Government of India on the basis of England1s pledges to India. The concept of England*s pledges, built upon declarations of Thomas Munro i Macaulay, Henry Lawrence, and above all upon Queen Victoria’s Proclamation, was enhanced by Hipon’s pro-Indian policy; yet from the end of Ripon’s Viceroyalty to 20 August 1917» successive viceroys and secretaries of state for India emphatically repudiated the feasibility of introducing English political 7 institutions to India. fTA time may conceivably come #•• to leave India to herself but for the present it is necessary to govern her as if we were to govern her for ever"'1’ - proved to be the consummation of England’s pledges and their delayed fulfilment. The growth of the extremist party in India was explained by Bipin Chandra Pal as follows: "Lord Pipon was a kind Viceroy but one who acted as a baby-comforter and we had been brought up for too long a period upon political lollipops; Lord Curzon threw the baby-comforter away and p thus made us feel our hunger for Swaraj •" At the same time it was the failure of the moderates to gain reforms by persuasion which resulted in the extremists1 determination to force the Government to yield power by coercion# Both the moderates and the extremists came from the middle class, both were reacting towards British rule, and both voiced Indian grievances# The moderates claimed social equality and a share in the British Government of India on the grounds that they were British subjects; the extremists demanded social equality and political emancipation as their birthright. The moderates appealed to Englishmen in England and placed their reliance on English history and English political ideas; the extremists drew sustenance from India1s 1. Sir John Seeley, The Expansion of England, London 1883? pp.193-194. 2. B.C.Pal, Speeches at Madras, Ganesh, Madras 1907? p#6# 8 heritage and appealed to Indians by invoking religious patriotism. The moderates emphasised the need for political apprenticeship under the providential guidance of British rule; the extremists rejected the idea of Englandfs providential mission in India as an illusion. They disparaged the constitutional agitation of the moderates as Mendicancy', and their stress on apprenticeship as an acceptance of ceaseless political servitude* Instead* they called for self-reliance and self-apprenticeship through Swadeshi, Boycott and Passive-Resistance. In contrast* the moderates stressed that their constitutional agitation was practical statesmanship, that emotional idealism was fraught with peril, that rashness was not courage, that British rule would not come to an end because of Boycott, and above all that the removal of British rule would result in chaos and anarchy. The present tendency to depict the early history of the Indian National Congress as 'The History of the Freedom Movement1 ignores the fact that the moderate leaders of the Congress constantly harped on the theme of securing the permanence of British rule in India. For Banerjea, Swaraj meant self-restraint;^" while Sinha and Gokhale said, on different occasions, that if the British were to leave 1. Surendranath Banerjea, A Nation in Making, Oxford University Press, 1925? p*l2$. 9 India, Indians would call them back before they reached 1 Aden* The moderates reconciled loyalty to England with Indian patriotism, believing that the two were necessarily compatible and complementary* Eor the extremists, Indian patriotism and loyalty to British rule were two diametrically conflicting entities. The moderates tenaciously sought gradual reform and could see no half-way-house between order and revolution. The extremists held that revolution was but rapid evolution, and that peace and order under British rule amounted to national stagnation. The moderates used English political ideas as their weapons for arguments and petitions. The extremists bolstered up IndiaTs past and advocated militant struggle, not debate. The moderates sought Hindu-Muslim unity, and maintained a secular view of politics; the extremists fostered Hindu pride and thus antagonized the Muslims. The moderates solicited constitutional reforms on the basis that the British Government of India was not an alien government but an administration which could transform itself through gradual stages into an Indian national government. The extremists regarded the British Government of India as a system of 1. Sinha to Lady Minto, Mary Countess of Minto, India; Minto and Morley, London 1934, p.298* flokhale to Lord Hardinge, Lord Hardinge, My Indian Years, London 1948, p.115* 10 despotic alien rule* The moderates aspired to attain Indian self-government within the British Empire. The extremists regarded the British Empire as imperialism based on capitalism, and strove to free India from British rule. Thus the differences between the moderates and the extremists were not confined to different methods of agitation, but were fundamental differences in aim and methods. This thesis seeks to outline the change in India's reaction to British rule from the period when the British Government of India was regarded as a providential government ordained to fulfil a mission, to the time when it was viewed as a Satanic government. With the exception of S.A.Wolpert, Tilak and Gokhale (University of California, 1962), standard works on the Indian national movement (i.e. H.C.E. Zacharias, Renacent India from Ram Mohan Roy to Mohandas Gandhi, London 1933 or, Andrews and Mukerji, The Rise and Growth of the Congress in India 1938? or, C.Y.Chintamani, Indian Politics since the Mutiny, London 1940), provide a general history of the Indian National Congress without sufficiently emphasising the mental conflict between the moderates and the extremists. S.A. Wolpertfs comparative study of Tilak and Gokhale portrays the role of the two best known representatives of the moderates and the extremists, yet it might lead the unsuspecting reader to draw the conclusion that the two Maharashtrian leaders were the only ones, or that 11 Maharashtra alone exemplified the history of the Indian national movement. While there are political biographies of Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, Aurobindo Ghosh, and numerous studies of Tilak, no full study has been written on Surendranath Banerjea, while Lajpat Rai has been virtually neglected. Thus the choice of contrasting Surendranath Banerjea with Lajpat Rai has been made in order to present a comprehensive study of Surendranath Banerjea, and to fill the gap on Lajpat Rai. When Gandhi led the Non-Co-operation movement Banerjea became an anachronism and was charged with national treason, hence his personality does not appeal to Indian historians of the freedom movement.
Recommended publications
  • Seeking Offense: Censorship and the Constitution of Democratic Politics in India
    SEEKING OFFENSE: CENSORSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICS IN INDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ameya Shivdas Balsekar August 2009 © 2009 Ameya Shivdas Balsekar SEEKING OFFENSE: CENSORSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICS IN INDIA Ameya Shivdas Balsekar, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 Commentators have frequently suggested that India is going through an “age of intolerance” as writers, artists, filmmakers, scholars and journalists among others have been targeted by institutions of the state as well as political parties and interest groups for hurting the sentiments of some section of Indian society. However, this age of intolerance has coincided with a period that has also been characterized by the “deepening” of Indian democracy, as previously subordinated groups have begun to participate more actively and substantively in democratic politics. This project is an attempt to understand the reasons for the persistence of illiberalism in Indian politics, particularly as manifest in censorship practices. It argues that one of the reasons why censorship has persisted in India is that having the “right to censor” has come be established in the Indian constitutional order’s negotiation of multiculturalism as a symbol of a cultural group’s substantive political empowerment. This feature of the Indian constitutional order has made the strategy of “seeking offense” readily available to India’s politicians, who understand it to be an efficacious way to discredit their competitors’ claims of group representativeness within the context of democratic identity politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Communities in the Developing World Scientific Communities in the Developing World
    Scientific Communities in the Developing World Scientific Communities in the Developing World Edited by jacques Caillard V.V. Krishna Roland Waast Sage Publications New Delhiflhousand Oaks/London Copyright @) Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna and Roland Waast, 1997. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 1997 by Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd M-32, Greater Kailash Market I New Delhi 110 048 Sage Publications Inc Sage Publications Ltd 2455 Teller Road 6 Bonhill Street Thousand Oaks, California 91320 London EC2A 4PU Published by Tejeshwar Singh for Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, phototypeset by Pagewell Photosetters, Pondicherry and printed at Chaman Enterprises, Delhi. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scientific communities in the developing world I edited by Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna, Roland Waast. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Science-Developing countries--History. 2. Science-Social aspect- Developing countries--History. I. Gaillard, Jacques, 1951- . 11. Krishna, V.V. 111. Waast, Roland, 1940- . Q127.2.S44 306.4'5'091724--dc20 1996 9617807 ISBN: 81-7036565-1 (India-hb) &8039-9330-7 (US-hb) Sage Production Editor: Sumitra Srinivasan Contents List of Tables List of Figures Preface 1. Introduction: Scientific Communities in the Developing World Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna and Roland Waast Part 1: Scientific Communities in Africa 2. Sisyphus or the Scientific Communities of Algeria Ali El Kenz and Roland Waast 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The HARVEST FIELD
    The HARVEST FIELD AUGUST, 189 7. ORIGINAL ARTICLES. A PLEASANT EPISODE. THE SNAKE-BITTEN HINDU’S GBATITUDE. BY THE EEV. JACOB CHAMBERLAIN, M.D. A M up on a little mountain in our mission district fifteen miles from Madanapalle. It stands 1,750 feet above the Madanapalle plain, and is, in the hot season, some ten degrees cooler. I have built here a little “ Hermitage” to which I can come for quiet literary work. The brain works more satisfactorily andrapidly with the lower temperature, and with the absence of the continual interruptions, to which the missionary at his own station is perpetually subject. Driving out to the foot of the mountain very early Monday morning, and climbing up the rough crooked path to the summit soon after sunrise, I can have five clear days with my aman­ uensis for my work in helping to prepare Telugu Christian literature for the growing native church, and go down „again Friday evening to have Saturday and Sunday at my station for other duties. Thus I am up here n o w ; but my usual isolation was interrupted one day last week by a very pleasing incident. 282 A PLEASANT EPISODE. I was sitting at my desk writing and glancing out upon the moun­ tain scenery, when, in the wide open doorway, a figure appeared, and looking up, I saw a man from one of our native Christian villages ten miles beyond this, who, with salaams and enquiries for my health, told me that he had come as the escort of a well-to-do high-caste Telugu landholder, who lived in the caste village adjacent to theirs, and who had come up to render his thanks to me for saving his life when he was a lad and had been bitten by a deadly serpent: would I be pleased to give him audience ? He was waiting in the adjoining clump of trees to know whether I could receive him now.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ñisforuol NDIH'
    ./l . l'e-¡c .."$*{fr.n;iT " a^ã*'.t't ç1' """'" A ñisforuol NDIH' Hermann Kulke and Dietmar Rothermund Ël I-ondon and New York f røeo] i i f The Freedom Movement and the partition of India 277 I The Freedom 't Movement and the a solidarity based on a glorious past. This solidarity 7 .{ traditionalism became Partition of India i a major feature of Indian nationalism - and as it was based on Hindu v traditions, it excluded the Muslims. i The Muslims were suspicious of this neo-Hinduism and even distrusted iq I its profession of religious universalism. The emphasis on the equality F i: of all religions was seen as particularly t a subtle threat to Islamic iden- tity. ! But while such trends among the educated Hindu elite were merely The Indian Freedom Movement i suspect to the Muslims, more popular movements of Hindu solidarity ,i - such as the cow-protection movement in Northern India _ were The challenge of imperial rule produced India's nationalism, which raised ''' positively resented by them as a direct attack on their own religious prac- its head rather early in the nineteenth century. Among the new educated i tices, which included cow-slaughter at certain religious fesiivals. the elite there were some critical intenectuars lookeã i wlo upon foreign rule i Hindi-urdu controversy in Northern India added additional fuel to the as a transient phenomenon. As earry as ; lg49 Gopal i{ari Desãmukh ! fire of communal conflict. The Hindus asked only for equal recognition praised American democracy in a Marathi newspaper and predicted that of their language Hindi, written in Devanagari script as a language the Indians would emulate the American I - - revolutionaries ànd drive out permitted in the courts of law, where so far urdu written in Nastaliq the British.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Fourty-One : (Dec 2, 1927
    1. SPEECH AT PUBLIC MEETING, CHICACOLE December 3, 1927 You seem to be dividing all the good things with poor Utkal1. I flattered myself with the assumption that my arrival here is one of the good things, for I was going to devote all the twenty days to seeing the skeletons of Orissa; but as you, the Andhras, are the gatekeepers of Orissa on this side, you have intercepted my march. But I am glad you have anticipated me also. After entering Andhra Desh, I have been doing my business with you and I know God will reward all those unknown people who have been co-operating with me who am a self- appointed representative of Daridranarayana. And here, too, you have been doing the same thing. Last night, several sister came and presented me with a purse. But let me tell you this is not after all my tour in Andhra. I am not going to let you alone so easily as this, nor will Deshabhakta Konda Venkatappayya let me alone, because I have toured in some parts of Ganjam. I am under promise to tour Andhra during the early part of next year, and let me hope what you are doing is only a foretaste of what you are going to do next year. You have faith in true non-co-operation. There is the great drink evil, eating into the vitals of the labouring population. I would like you to non-co-operate with that evil without a single thought and I make a sporting proposal, viz., that those who give up drink habit should divide their savings with me on behalf of Daridranarayan.
    [Show full text]
  • BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI 620 024 B.A. HISTORY Programme – Course Structure Under CBCS (Applicable to the Ca
    BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI 620 024 B.A. HISTORY Programme – Course Structure under CBCS (applicable to the candidates admitted from the academic year 2010 -2011 onwards) Sem. Part Course Ins. Credit Exam Marks Total Hrs Hours Int. Extn. I Language Course – I (LC) – 6 3 3 25 75 100 Tamil*/Other Languages +# II English Language Course - I (ELC) 6 3 3 25 75 100 I III Core Course – I (CC) History of India 5 4 3 25 75 100 from Pre history to 1206 AD Core Course – II (CC) History of India 5 4 3 25 75 100 from 1206 -1707 AD First Allied Course –I (AC) – Modern 5 3 3 25 75 100 Governments I First Allied Course –II (AC) – Modern 3 - @ - - - Governments – II Total 30 17 500 I Language Course – II (LC) - 6 3 3 25 75 100 Tamil*/Other Languages +# II English Language Course – II (ELC) 6 3 3 25 75 100 II III Core Course – III(CC) History of Tamil 6 4 3 25 75 100 nadu upto 1801 AD First Allied Course – II (CC) - Modern 2 3 3 25 75 100 Governments – II First Allied Course – III (AC) – 5 4 3 25 75 100 Introduction to Tourism Environmental Studies 3 2 3 25 75 100 IV Value Education 2 2 3 25 75 100 Total 30 21 700 I Language Course – III (LC) 6 3 3 25 75 100 Tamil*/Other Languages +# II English Language Course - III (ELC) 6 3 3 25 75 100 III III Core Course – IV (CC) – History of 6 5 3 25 75 100 Modern India from 1707 - 1857AD Second Allied Course – I (AC) – Public 6 3 3 25 75 100 Administration I Second Allied Course – II (AC) - Public 4 - @ - -- -- Administration II IV Non Major Elective I – for those who 2 2 3 25 75 100 studied Tamil under
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Indian Political Thought Ii Modern Indian Political Thought Modern Indian Political Thought Text and Context
    Modern Indian Political Thought ii Modern Indian Political Thought Modern Indian Political Thought Text and Context Bidyut Chakrabarty Rajendra Kumar Pandey Copyright © Bidyut Chakrabarty and Rajendra Kumar Pandey, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 2009 by SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B1/I-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044, India www.sagepub.in SAGE Publications Inc 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom SAGE Publications Asia-Pacifi c Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 Published by Vivek Mehra for SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, typeset in 10/12 pt Palatino by Star Compugraphics Private Limited, Delhi and printed at Chaman Enterprises, New Delhi. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chakrabarty, Bidyut, 1958– Modern Indian political thought: text and context/Bidyut Chakrabarty, Rajendra Kumar Pandey. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Political science—India—Philosophy. 2. Nationalism—India. 3. Self- determination, National—India. 4. Great Britain—Colonies—India. 5. India— Colonisation. 6. India—Politics and government—1919–1947. 7. India— Politics and government—1947– 8. India—Politics and government— 21st century. I. Pandey, Rajendra Kumar. II. Title. JA84.I4C47 320.0954—dc22 2009 2009025084 ISBN: 978-81-321-0225-0 (PB) The SAGE Team: Reema Singhal, Vikas Jain, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and Trinankur Banerjee To our parents who introduced us to the world of learning vi Modern Indian Political Thought Contents Preface xiii Introduction xv PART I: REVISITING THE TEXTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of INDIA from 1885 to 1984 Dr. A. RAVISANKAR, Ph.D., UNIT-I I: CONGRESS from 1885 to 1905
    ALLIED: HISTORY OF INDIA FROM 1885 TO 1984 Dr. A. RAVISANKAR, Ph.D., UNIT-I I: CONGRESS FROM 1885 TO 1905 1. Formed in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume, a retired British civil servant. 2. Other founding members include Dadabhai Naoroji (Born on September 4, 1825) and Dinshaw Wacha. 3. The first session was held in Bombay under the presidency of Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee in 1885. 4. The first session was attended by 72 delegates from across the country. 5. Viceroy of India at the time was Lord Dufferin who gave his permission to Hume for the first session. 6. The Congress was formed with the intention of discussing problems faced by the people of the country irrespective of caste, creed, religion or language. 7. It was basically a movement of the upper and middle class, western-educated Indians in its moderate phase. 8. The second session of the Congress was held in Calcutta in 1886 followed by the third in Madras in 1887. Moderate Phase (1885 to 1905) • The moderate phase of the Congress (or the national movement) was dominated by the ‘moderates’. • They were people who believed in British justice and were loyal to them. Aims and demands • Education of the masses and organising public opinion, make people aware of their rights. • Indian representation in the Executive Council and in the Indian Council in London. • Reform of the legislative councils. • Separation of the executive from the judiciary. • Decreased land revenue tax and ending peasant oppression. • After 1892, raised the slogan, “No taxation without representation.” • Reduced spending on the army.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 1885-1947 Year Place President
    INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 1885-1947 Year Place President 1885 Bombay W.C. Bannerji 1886 Calcutta Dadabhai Naoroji 1887 Madras Syed Badruddin Tyabji 1888 Allahabad George Yule First English president 1889 Bombay Sir William 1890 Calcutta Sir Pherozeshah Mehta 1891 Nagupur P. Anandacharlu 1892 Allahabad W C Bannerji 1893 Lahore Dadabhai Naoroji 1894 Madras Alfred Webb 1895 Poona Surendranath Banerji 1896 Calcutta M Rahimtullah Sayani 1897 Amraoti C Sankaran Nair 1898 Madras Anandamohan Bose 1899 Lucknow Romesh Chandra Dutt 1900 Lahore N G Chandravarkar 1901 Calcutta E Dinsha Wacha 1902 Ahmedabad Surendranath Banerji 1903 Madras Lalmohan Ghosh 1904 Bombay Sir Henry Cotton 1905 Banaras G K Gokhale 1906 Calcutta Dadabhai Naoroji 1907 Surat Rashbehari Ghosh 1908 Madras Rashbehari Ghosh 1909 Lahore Madanmohan Malaviya 1910 Allahabad Sir William Wedderburn 1911 Calcutta Bishan Narayan Dhar 1912 Patna R N Mudhalkar 1913 Karachi Syed Mahomed Bahadur 1914 Madras Bhupendranath Bose 1915 Bombay Sir S P Sinha 1916 Lucknow A C Majumdar 1917 Calcutta Mrs. Annie Besant 1918 Bombay Syed Hassan Imam 1918 Delhi Madanmohan Malaviya 1919 Amritsar Motilal Nehru www.bankersadda.com | www.sscadda.com| www.careerpower.in | www.careeradda.co.inPage 1 1920 Calcutta Lala Lajpat Rai 1920 Nagpur C Vijaya Raghavachariyar 1921 Ahmedabad Hakim Ajmal Khan 1922 Gaya C R Das 1923 Delhi Abul Kalam Azad 1923 Coconada Maulana Muhammad Ali 1924 Belgaon Mahatma Gandhi 1925 Cawnpore Mrs.Sarojini Naidu 1926 Guwahati Srinivas Ayanagar 1927 Madras M A Ansari 1928 Calcutta Motilal Nehru 1929 Lahore Jawaharlal Nehru 1930 No session J L Nehru continued 1931 Karachi Vallabhbhai Patel 1932 Delhi R D Amritlal 1933 Calcutta Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rrb Ntpc Top 100 Indian National Movement Questions
    RRB NTPC TOP 100 INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT QUESTIONS RRB NTPC TOP 100 INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT QUESTIONS Stay Connected With SPNotifier EBooks for Bank Exams, SSC & Railways 2020 General Awareness EBooks Computer Awareness EBooks Monthly Current Affairs Capsules RRB NTPC TOP 100 INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT QUESTIONS Click Here to Download the E Books for Several Exams Click here to check the topics related RRB NTPC RRB NTPC Roles and Responsibilities RRB NTPC ID Verification RRB NTPC Instructions RRB NTPC Exam Duration RRB NTPC EXSM PWD Instructions RRB NTPC Forms RRB NTPC FAQ Test Day RRB NTPC TOP 100 INDIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT QUESTIONS 1. The Hindu Widows Remarriage act was Explanation: Annie Besant was the first woman enacted in which of the following year? President of Indian National Congress. She presided over the 1917 Calcutta session of the A. 1865 Indian National Congress. B. 1867 C. 1856 4. In which of the following movement, all the D. 1869 top leaders of the Congress were arrested by Answer: C the British Government? Explanation: The Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act A. Quit India Movement was enacted on 26 July 1856 that legalised the B. Khilafat Movement remarriage of Hindu widows in all jurisdictions of C. Civil Disobedience Movement D. Home Rule Agitation India under East India Company rule. Answer: A 2. Which movement was supported by both, The Indian National Army as well as The Royal Explanation: On 8 August 1942 at the All-India Indian Navy? Congress Committee session in Bombay, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi launched the A. Khilafat movement 'Quit India' movement. The next day, Gandhi, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Jird Issue 7 Svh 08 15 11 3
    A forum for academic, social, and timely issues affecting religious communities around the world. The Journal of Inter­Religious Dialogue Issue 7 August 2011 www.irdialogue.org 1 To submit an article visit www.irdialogue.org/submissions A forum for academic, social, and timely issues affecting religious communities around the world. Editorial Board Stephanie Varnon­Hughes and Joshua Zaslow Stanton, Editors‐in‐Chief Aimee Upjohn Light, Executive Editor Matthew Dougherty, Publishing Editor Sophia Khan, Associate Publishing Editor Christopher Stedman, Managing Director of State of Formation Ian Burzynski, Associate Director of State of Formation Editorial Consultants Frank Fredericks, Media Consultant Marinus Iwuchukwu, Outreach Consultant Stephen Butler Murray, Managing Editor Emeritus www.irdialogue.org 2 To submit an article visit www.irdialogue.org/submissions A forum for academic, social, and timely issues affecting religious communities around the world. Board of Scholars and Practitioners Y. Alp Aslandogan, President, Institute of Interfaith Dialog Justus Baird, Director of the Center for Multifaith Education, Auburn Theological Seminary Alan Brill, Cooperman/Ross Endowed Professor in honor of Sister Rose Thering, Seton Hall University Tarunjit Singh Butalia, Chair of Interfaith Committee, World Sikh Council - America Region Reginald Broadnax, Dean of Academic Affairs, Hood Theological Seminary Thomas Cattoi, Assistant Professor of Christology and Cultures, Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley/Graduate Theological Union Miriam Cooke,
    [Show full text]
  • Indian National Congress Sessions
    Indian National Congress Sessions INC sessions led the course of many national movements as well as reforms in India. Consequently, the resolutions passed in the INC sessions reflected in the political reforms brought about by the British government in India. Although the INC went through a major split in 1907, its leaders reconciled on their differences soon after to give shape to the emerging face of Independent India. Here is a list of all the Indian National Congress sessions along with important facts about them. This list will help you prepare better for SBI PO, SBI Clerk, IBPS Clerk, IBPS PO, etc. Indian National Congress Sessions During the British rule in India, the Indian National Congress (INC) became a shiny ray of hope for Indians. It instantly overshadowed all the other political associations established prior to it with its very first meeting. Gradually, Indians from all walks of life joined the INC, therefore making it the biggest political organization of its time. Most exam Boards consider the Indian National Congress Sessions extremely noteworthy. This is mainly because these sessions played a great role in laying down the foundational stone of Indian polity. Given below is the list of Indian National Congress Sessions in chronological order. Apart from the locations of various sessions, make sure you also note important facts pertaining to them. Indian National Congress Sessions Post Liberalization Era (1990-2018) Session Place Date President 1 | P a g e 84th AICC Plenary New Delhi Mar. 18-18, Shri Rahul Session 2018 Gandhi Chintan Shivir Jaipur Jan. 18-19, Smt.
    [Show full text]