DOCSLIB.ORG

Select Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Select Bibliography SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY ARCHIVES Central Intelligence Agency, Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room. Digital National Security Archive. Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. National Security Archive, Korea Project. Republic of Korea Presidential Archive. PRIMARY SOURCES Central Intelligence Agency. Korean Fishing Areas in the Yellow Sea—Spawning Ground for Maritime Confict. GCK-RP 75–20, May 1975. Central Intelligence Agency Library. https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA- RDP86T00608R000600140005-7.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2017. Ministry of Defense of Japan. National Security Strategy December 17, 2013. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense of Japan, 2013. Ministry of Defense of Japan. Defense of Japan 2017. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense of Japan, 2017. Ministry of National Defense. The People’s Republic of China, Full Text: China’s Military Strategy, 16 May 2015. http://eng.mod.gov.cn/Press/2015- 05/26/content_4586805_4.htm. Offce of the President. Global Korea: The National Security Strategy of the Republic of Korea. Seoul: Offce of the President, 2009. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 205 I. Bowers, The Modernisation of the Republic of Korea Navy, Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacifc, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92291-1 206 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Offce of the Secretary of Defense. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2011. Prime Minister of Japan. National Security Strategy, 17 December 2013. http://japan.kantei.go.jp/96_abe/documents/2013/__icsFiles/afield- fle/2013/12/17/NSS.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2017. Republic of Korea Defence Acquisition Program Administration. “Seobukdoseo haesang jeollyeok 24sigan gamsichegye guchuk [Construction of a 24-Hour Surveillance System for the Maritime Military Power of the Northwest Islands].” Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration Press Release, 2 September 2013. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “Je82hoe bang- wisaeopchujinwiwonhoe gyeolgwa [Results of the 82nd DAPA Committee].” Defense Acquisition Program Administration Press Release, 12 August 2014. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “Je95hoe bangwisaeopchujinwiwonhoe gyeolgwa [Results of the 95th Defense Business Promotion committee],” 15 May 2016. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “Gwanggaeto- III Batch-II tamsaekgaebal saeop gyeyak chegyeol [Gwanggaeto-III Batch-II Conclusion of Exploratory Development Business Contract].” Defence Acquisition Program Administration Press Release, 24 June 2016. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “Je96hoe bang- wisaeopchujinwiwonhoe gyeolgwa [Results of the 96th DAPA Committee].” Defense Acquisition Program Administration Press Release, 30 September 2016. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “Bangwisaeopcheong, chagihowiham 3dangye saeop chaksu [DAPA Launches Third Phase of Next Frigate].” Defense Acquisition Program Administration Press Release, 27 December 2016. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Program Administration. “HaegunjeonsulC4Ichegye seongneunggaeryangsaeop gaeyo [Naval Tactical C4I System Performance Improvement Project Summary],” 30 November 2016. http://www.dapa.go.kr/user/boardList.action?command view&page 1&boar- = = dId I_36172&boardSeq I_38914&id dapa_kr_030303160000. = = = Accessed 20 November 2017. Republic of Korea Defense Acquisition Promotion Agency. “Jangbogo-III Batch-I saeopchujinsanghwang [Chang Bogo-III Batch-I Business Situation],” 23 December 2016. http://www.dapa.go.kr/user/boardList.action?com- mand view&page 1&boardId I_6033&boardSeq I_40979&id dapa_ = = = = = kr_030302340000. Accessed 20 March 2018. Republic of Korea Government. “2007nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 207 [Report on the Completion of the 2007 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” January 2008. Republic of Korea Government. “Cheonanham pigyeoksageon baekse [The Warship Cheonan Attack White Paper].” Seoul: Republic of Korea Government, 2011. Republic of Korea Government. “2010nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2010 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” April 2011. Republic of Korea Government. “2011nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2011 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” February 2012. Republic of Korea Government. “2012nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2012 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” March 2013. Republic of Korea Government. “2013nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2013 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” March 2014. Republic of Korea Government. “2015nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2013 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” April 2016. Republic of Korea Government. “2016nyeondo gukjeonggamsagyeolgwa sijeong min cheoriyogusahange daehan cheorigyeolgwagoseo (Gukbangbu Sogwan) [Report on the Completion of the 2016 National Assembly Audit Results and the Completion of the Corrective and Handling Requirements (Ministry of National Defense)],” February 2017. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Defense White Paper 1994– 1995. Seoul: Korea Institute of Defense Analysis, 1995. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Defense White Paper 1998. Seoul: Korean Institute of Defense Analysis, 1999. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Defense Data and Statistics 2001. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2001. 208 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Defence White Paper 2000. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2001. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. “Jajugukbanggwa Uriui Anbo [Self-reliant National Defense Capability and Our Security].” Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2003. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Participatory Government Defense Policy. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2003. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Defense Reform 2020. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2005. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. 2008 Defense White Paper. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2008. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. “’10 – ’14 Gukbangjunggigyehoek [’10–‘14 Mid-term Defence Plan].” Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, Press Release. Seoul: Ministry of National Defence, 2009. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. Public Announcement of Defense Basic Reform Plan (2009–2020). Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2009. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. 2010 Defense White Paper. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2010. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. “’12 – ’16 Gukbangjunggigyehoek [’12–‘16 Mid-term Defence Plan].” Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, Press Release. Seoul: Ministry of National Defence, 2011. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. 2012 Defense White Paper. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2012. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense. 2016 Defence White Paper. Seoul: Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, 2016. Republic of Korea National Defense Committee. “Gukgunbudaeui somallia haeyeok pagyeon donguian geomto [Review of the Motion to Dispatch Korean Military Forces to Somalia Waters].” Seoul: National Defense Committee, 2009. Republic of Korea Navy. “Haegun [Navy].” Seoul: Republic of Korea Navy, 1998. Republic of Korea Navy. “Haegun haeoemugi doip gwallyeon [Naval Overseas Weapons Acquisitions].” Seoul: Republic of Korea Navy, 2005. Republic of Korea Navy. “Haegun [Navy].” Gyeryong: ROKN Troop Information and Public Relations Offce, 2011. Republic of Korea Navy. “(Nuguna al su Issneun!) Haegunjakjeon Deuryeodabogi [As Anyone Can See! Look Into Naval Operations].” Seoul: Republic of Korea Navy, 2011. Republic of Korea Navy. “Chagi giroebuseolham(MLS-II) Nampoham tjinsu [Next Minelayer (MLS-II), the Warship Nampo Launched].” Republic of Korea Navy Press Release, 27 May 2015. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 209 Republic of Korea Navy. “Gandanhago pyeonhage ilgeul su inneun haegungaideu- buk [An Easy and Simple to Read Navy Guide Book].” Gyeryong: Navy Headquarters, 2016. Republic of Korea Navy. “214Geup Jamsuham (KSS-II) 9Beonham ‘sindolseokam’ Jinsu [9th 214 Class Submarine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Record of North Korea's Major Conventional Provocations Since
    May 25, 2010 Record of North Korea’s Major Conventional Provocations since 1960s Complied by the Office of the Korea Chair, CSIS Please note that the conventional provocations we listed herein only include major armed conflicts, military/espionage incursions, border infractions, acts of terrorism including sabotage bombings and political assassinations since the 1960s that resulted in casualties in order to analyze the significance of the attack on the Cheonan and loss of military personnel. This list excludes any North Korean verbal threats and instigation, kidnapping as well as the country’s missile launches and nuclear tests. January 21, 1968 Blue House Raid A North Korean armed guerrilla unit crossed the Demilitarized Zone into South Korea and, in disguise of South Korean military and civilians, attempted to infiltrate the Blue House to assassinate South Korean President Park Chung-hee. The assassination attempt was foiled, and in the process of pursuing commandos escaping back to North Korea, a significant number of South Korean police and soldiers were killed and wounded, allegedly as many as 68 and 66, respectively. Six American casualties were also reported. ROK Response: All 31 North Korean infiltrators were hunted down and killed except Kim Shin-Jo. After the raid, South Korea swiftly moved to strengthen the national defense by establishing the ROK Reserve Forces and defense industry and installing iron fencing along the military demarcation line. January 23, 1968 USS Pueblo Seizure The U.S. navy intelligence ship Pueblo on its mission near the coast of North Korea was captured in international waters by North Korea. Out of 83 crewmen, one died and 82 men were held prisoners for 11 months.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea Section 3
    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles
    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles The Chinese Navy Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Saunders, EDITED BY Yung, Swaine, PhILLIP C. SAUNderS, ChrISToPher YUNG, and Yang MIChAeL Swaine, ANd ANdreW NIeN-dzU YANG CeNTer For The STUdY oF ChINeSe MilitarY AffairS INSTITUTe For NATIoNAL STrATeGIC STUdIeS NatioNAL deFeNSe UNIverSITY COVER 4 SPINE 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY COVER.indd 3 COVER 1 11/29/11 12:35 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 1 11/29/11 12:37 PM 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 2 11/29/11 12:37 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang Published by National Defense University Press for the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies Washington, D.C. 2011 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 3 11/29/11 12:37 PM Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Chapter 5 was originally published as an article of the same title in Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 144–169. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Chinese Navy : expanding capabilities, evolving roles / edited by Phillip C. Saunders ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in the Republic of Korea
    Situation in the Republic of Korea Article 5 Report June 2014 www.icc-cpi.int Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................3 II. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................9 III. CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND...................................................................................................10 IV. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...............................................................................................................11 V. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES ..................................................................................11 A. Territorial and Temporal Jurisdiction ......................................................................................11 B. Personal Jurisdiction ...................................................................................................................12 VI. LEGAL ANALYSIS – JURISDICTION RATIONE MATERIAE ................................................12 A. The Existence of an Armed Conflict .........................................................................................12 B. The Sinking of the South Korean Warship Cheonan on 26 March 2010..............................14 C. The Shelling of the South Korean Island Yeonpyeong on 23 November 2010 ...................17 1. War crimes of attacking civilians or civilian objects (Articles 8(2)(b)(i) or (ii)) .....................17
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea: Defense White Paper 2010
    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia
    Sinking of MV Sewol - Excerpted from Wikipedia, The sinking of MV Sewol (Hangul: 세월호 침몰 사고; Hanja: 世越 號沈沒事故), also referred to as the Sewol Ferry Disaster, occurred on the morning of 16 April 2014, when the passenger/ro-ro ferry was en route (on the way) from Incheon towards Jeju in South Korea. The Japanese-built South Korean ferry sank while carrying 476 people, mostly secondary school students from Danwon High School (Ansan City). The 6,825-ton vessel sent a distress signal from about 2.7 kilometres (1.7 mi) north of Byeongpungdo at 08:58 Korea Standard Time (23:58 UTC, 15 April 2014). In total, 304 passengers and crew members died in the disaster. Of the approximately 172 survivors, more than half were rescued by fishing boats and other commercial vessels that arrived at the scene approximately 40 minutes after the South Korean coast guard. The sinking of Sewol resulted in widespread social and political reaction within South Korea. Many criticized the actions of the captain and most of the crew. Also criticized were the ferry operator and the regulators who oversaw its operations, along with the South Korean government for its disaster response (including the poor showing of the then Korean coastguard) and attempts to downplay government culpability. (to weaken the governmental responsibility) THE SINKING OF MV SEWOL 1 On 15 May 2014, the captain and three crew members were charged with murder, while the other 11 members of the crew were indicted for (be accused of) abandoning the ship. An arrest warrant was also issued for Yoo Byung-eun, the owner of Chonghaejin Marine, which operated Sewol, but he could not be found despite a nationwide manhunt (a nationwide seeking for a guilty man).
    [Show full text]
  • Coréia & Artes Marciais
    Centro Filosófico do Kung Fu - Internacional CORÉIA & ARTES MARCIAIS História e Filosofia Volume 3 www.centrofilosoficodokungfu.com.br “Se atravessarmos a vida convencidos de que a nossa é a única maneira de pensar que existe, vamos acabar perdendo todas as oportunidades que surgem a cada dia” (Akio Morita) Editorial Esta publicação é o 3° volume da coletânea “História e Filosofia das Artes Marciais”, selecionada para cada país que teve destaque na sua formação. Aqui o foco é a Coréia. Todo conteúdo é original da “Wikipédia”, editado e fornecido gratuitamente pelo Centro Filosófico do Kung Fu - Internacional. É muito importante divulgar esta coletânea no meio das artes marciais, independente do praticante; pois estaremos contribuindo para a formação de uma classe de artistas marciais de melhor nível que, com certeza, nosso meio estará se enriquecendo. Bom trabalho ! CORÉIA & ARTES MARCIAIS História e Filosofia Conteúdo 1 Coreia 1 1.1 História ................................................ 1 1.1.1 Gojoseon (2333 a.C. - 37a.C.) ................................ 2 1.1.2 Era dos Três Reinos da Coreia (37 a.C. - 668 d.C.)/ Balhae (713 d.C. - 926 d.C.) ..... 2 1.1.3 Silla Unificada (668 d.C. - 935 d.C.) e Balhae ........................ 2 1.2 Ciência e tecnologia .......................................... 3 1.3 Imigração para o Brasil ........................................ 3 1.4 Ver também .............................................. 3 1.5 Ligações externas ........................................... 3 2 História da Coreia 4 2.1 Ver também .............................................. 7 3 Cronologia da história da Coreia 8 3.1 Pré-História .............................................. 8 3.2 Proto-Três Reinos ........................................... 8 3.3 Três Reinos .............................................. 8 3.4 Silla e Balhae unificada ........................................ 9 3.5 Coreia Dividida ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Thickening Web of Asian Security Cooperation: Deepening Defense
    The Thickening Web of Asian Security Cooperation Deepening Defense Ties Among U.S. Allies and Partners in the Indo-Pacific Scott W. Harold, Derek Grossman, Brian Harding, Jeffrey W. Hornung, Gregory Poling, Jeffrey Smith, Meagan L. Smith C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3125 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0333-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photo by Japan Maritime Self Defense Force. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Since the turn of the century, an important trend toward new or expanded defense cooperation among U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Jus in Bello in the Cheonan and Yeonpyeong Island Attacks
    War on the Korean Peninsula? Application of Jus in Bello in the Cheonan and Yeonpyeong Island Attacks Seunghyun Sally Nam* The media often reports that the Korean Peninsula remains technically in a state of war, but there remains uncertainty about whether its countries are still legally at war. On December 6, 2010, the International Criminal Court (ICC) released a statement that it was initiating a preliminary examination to determine whether it had jurisdiction over the sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan by a North Korean submarine, as well as over North Korean artillery attacks near Yeonpyeong Island. For the two attacks to fall under the jurisdiction of the ICC, they must be found to be “war crimes,” which would require that the laws of war (jus in bello) be in effect at the times they were committed. Because the signing of the Korean * S.J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School; M.Jur, Oxford University, 2007; LL.M, Korea University, 2009; LL.B, Korea University, 2004. The author thanks Professors Dapo Akande, Jean Galbraith, Boris Kondoch for their thoughts and comments on an earlier draft of the Article. The author also appreciates invaluable comments from Dr. You Ki-Jun and Mr. Hwang Jun-Shik at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Seoul, Korea. This Article does not represent the view of the Korean government. Special thanks to the editors at the University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review for their excellent editing and feedback. Lastly, the author is grateful to Professors Park Ki-Gab and Jung Kyung-Soo for their mentorship, and her family for their continuous support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Korea: a Defence and Security Primer
    Today, the Republic of Korea (ROK) is a global economic and Primer Security and A Defence Korea: of The Republic industrial powerhouse and is identified as a world leader in ship- building, motor manufacturing and information technology. South Korea has also developed into a vibrant democracy. Despite all its successes the country remains locked in a deadly stand-off with its northern neighbour. Almost 60 years after the end of the Korean War, issues concerning defence and security remain of pri- mary societal and political importance in South Korea. This report attempts to summarise the ROK’s defence and security sectors. In four chapters the report addresses security policy and politics, defence reform, defence industry and R&D. Main findings in the report are that South Korea’s defence and security sector is in a period of general transition and change. Threat perceptions and the fragility of security on the Korean Peninsula have intensified over the past few years. Political reconsiderations of South Korea’s security and defence policies have raised contentions over the direction of its defence reform process, and how it will be implemented. South Korea’s defence industrial and R&D sector is actively seeking increased independence and profitability. It is however limited in how it can pursue these structural changes. This volume is published as part of the Asia Security Studies programme. The Republic of Korea: Download our other reports at www.foi.se/asia A Defence and Security Primer Kaan Korkmaz and John Rydqvist FOI-R--3427--SE
    [Show full text]
  • Victories for U.S. Merchant Marine! MSP Funding Increased, Ex-Im Bank Reauthorized He Year Ended on a High Program to $4,999,990 Per Ship Ty Program
    Organized 1885 Official Organ of the Sailors’ Union of the Pacific Volume LXXVIII No. 12 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Friday, December 25, 2015 Victories for U.S. Merchant Marine! MSP funding increased, Ex-Im Bank reauthorized he year ended on a high program to $4,999,990 per ship ty Program. A ninth vessel, the note when on Decem- in Fiscal Year 2017; $5 million APL Guam which replaced the Tber 18, President Obama per ship in Fiscal Years 2018, APL Cyprine in the program is signed omnibus spending legis- 2019, and 2020; and $5,230,000 the subject of a dispute between lation (Consolidated Appropria- per ship in Fiscal Year 2021. the Union and APL. See the tions Act, 2016) approved by the This increase, which reflects the President’s Report on Page 10. House of Representatives and the amount the Maritime Adminis- In other good news this month Senate that includes much need- tration has indicated is necessary for the maritime industry, the ed and significant new funding to retain the 60 vessels and their charter of the U.S. Export-Im- levels for the Maritime Security maritime jobs for the U.S.-flag, port Bank was renewed De- Program (MSP). will help to guarantee that the cember 4, as President Obama In the short term, the legisla- Department of Defense will signed into law five-year surface tion increases MSP funding for continue to have the commercial transportation authorization leg- Fiscal Year 2016 (October 1, 2015 sealift capacity it needs to pro- islation, known as the “highway through September 30, 2016) by tect American interests around bill,” which includes a provision $24 million, making each vessel the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Northern Limit Line Dispute
    NORTH KOREA INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTATION PROJECT E-DOSSIER #6 The Origins of the Northern Limit Line Dispute May 2012 THE ORIGINS OF THE NORTHERN LIMIT LINE DISPUTE: NKIDP E-DOSSIER Introduction 1 The Origins of the Northern Limit Line Dispute by Terence Roehrig * * * The documents contained in this collection were obtained for NKIDP by Eliza Gheorghe, Jae-Jung Suh, and Charles Kraus. DOCUMENT No. 1 Memorandum for Secretary Kissinger from Richard H. Solomon, “The Korean 4 Situation and the China Element” December 3, 1973 DOCUMENT No. 2 Memorandum for General Scowcroft, through W.R. Smyser, from John A. 7 Froebem Jr., “Proposed WSAG Meeting on Korean Situation” December 3, 1973 DOCUMENT No. 3 9 Joint State/Defense Message, “Korean Northwest Coastal Situation” December 4, 1973 DOCUMENT No. 4 11 Joint State/Defense Message, “Questions Regarding Northern Limit Line” December 21, 1973 DOCUMENT No. 5 Memorandum for Secretary Kissinger from John A. Froebe, Jr., “Korean West 14 Coast Island Situation” December 22, 1973 DOCUMENT No. 6 16 Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence, “The West Coast Korean Islands” January 1, 1974 DOCUMENT No. 7 20 Briefing on the Violation of the Territorial Waters of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea by Espionage Vessels of Park Chung Hee’s Puppet Clique in South Korea February 1974 i www.wilsoncenter.org/nkidp The Origins of the NLL Dispute NKIDP e-Dossier DOCUMENT No. 8 23 Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, SECRET, Urgent, No. 060.076 February 21, 1974 DOCUMENT No. 9 Telegram from Pyongyang to Bucharest, SECRET, Urgent, No. 060.079 25 February 25, 1974 DOCUMENT No.
    [Show full text]