Woodstock: the Rise of Political Complexity in North Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Woodstock: the Rise of Political Complexity in North Georgia WOODSTOCK: THE RISE OF POLITICAL COMPLEXITY IN NORTH GEORGIA by JULIE GAYLE MARKIN (Under the Direction of David J. Hally) ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the cultural changes experienced by the inhabitants of northern Georgia during the Woodstock phase (A.D. 800 to 1000). Woodstock subsistence and settlement data provide the foundation for understanding the rise of political complexity (e.g. the Etowah chiefdom) in north Georgia in the Mississippian period, an issue that has been greatly overlooked to this point. The results of my research allow for the construction of a developmental history for the Etowah chiefdom. The Woodstock phase witnessed a dramatic increase in the ubiquity of maize, the addition of new vessel forms in multiple sizes, and a diversification in vessel forms in general. These changes suggest an indigenous response to changes in food preparation and consumption practices related to maize production. Polities of Mississippian chiefdoms were based around administrative centers that often exhibited platform mound and plaza construction. An absence of administrative centers in Woodstock site clusters suggests that in north Georgia the initial stage of polity development involved the coalescence of equally powerful settlements into defined territorial entities. Data generated from this research suggest the evolution of political complexity involved fundamental changes in subsistence regimes and political organization. INDEX WORDS: Archaeology, Woodstock Phase, Maize, Vessel Form Analysis, Site Clustering, Political Complexity, Etowah WOODSTOCK: THE RISE OF POLITICAL COMPLEXITY IN NORTH GEORGIA by JULIE GAYLE MARKIN B.A., The University of Alabama, 1994 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2007 © 2007 Julie Gayle Markin All Rights Reserved WOODSTOCK: THE RISE OF POLITICAL COMPLEXITY IN NORTH GEORGIA by JULIE GAYLE MARKIN Major Professor: David J. Hally Committee: Ervan Garrison Stephen Kowalewski Elizabeth Reitz Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must express my appreciation and gratitude to a number of people whose patience, encouragement, assistance, and support were instrumental in propelling me to complete this monstrous undertaking. I cannot overstate the unwavering support, both emotional and financial, of my parents, Charles and Patricia Markin. I hope that my completion of this process helps bring closure and satisfaction to my father in particular, as his doctoral pursuits were sacrificed to provide for the education, health, and happiness of myself and my three siblings, Chuck, Rob, and Molly Markin. I also must thank my siblings and my sisters-in-law Phoebe and Sharon for the encouragement they offered year after year. I truly must thank Aaron Lampman, my fiancé, for propping me up physically, emotionally, and academically throughout this process. I extend my thanks to numerous individuals that were critical to my acquiring the data that are the foundation of this dissertation. I am indebted to Mark Williams for the access he allowed me to the Georgia Archaeological Site File. Without that data, this dissertation would not exist. I must thank Paul Webb of TRC Garrow and Associates and Steve Webb of RS Webb for allowing me to scour their data and analyze ceramics from unpublished large-scale archaeological investigations of Woodstock sites in north Georgia. Also, much of this research could not have been conducted without the funding provided by the National Science Foundation and Sigma Xi. This dissertation could not have been completed without the efforts of my major professor, Dr. David Hally, whose unparalleled attention to detail was critical in iv producing a sound document. I extend thanks to the members of my committee, Drs. Ervan Garrison, Stephen Kowalewski and Elizabeth Reitz for the valuable comments that made this dissertation a thorough and theoretically important piece of research. The most important influence in my graduate anthropology career has been the director of my undergraduate Honor’s thesis, Dr. V. Jim Knight. After participating in his field school and working in his archaeology lab, I knew my future involved the pursuit of an academic career in archaeology. More significantly, though, Dr. Knight instilled in me a love for field archaeology. For his continued mentoring, I am and will be forever grateful. Appreciation is extended to others whose contributions made significant impact on my research. Amanda Tickner at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, conducted the botanical analyses. Andrea Adams gathered data for me from the Georgia Archaeological Site File while I was teaching courses in Ohio. The Department of Anthropology office staff deserves more gratitude than I can express for all of their assistance over the years. Thank you Margie Floyd, Charlotte Blume, LaBau Bryan, Lisa Norris, and Jill Morris. Field work at the Thompson site in Gordon County, Georgia, was possible only through the generosity of Jim Langford and the Coosawattee Foundation. Many students and volunteers toiled away in the hot summers of 2002 and 2003, and their sweat is noted and duly appreciated. Finally, I must acknowledge the support of my faithful canine companions, Tyler and Huckleberry, for their unconditional love and the wet kisses that kept me awake through many a late night or energetically greeted me on too many early mornings. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................i LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1 History of Maize Cultivation.........................................................................4 Models for Understanding Increasing Political Complexity.........................7 Defining Mississippian................................................................................22 Mississippian Origins..................................................................................25 Placing the Woodstock Phase in Historical Context...................................30 Late Woodland to Mississippian Transition................................................37 Organization of the Dissertation .................................................................37 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.....................................................................40 Cumberland Plateau ....................................................................................43 Blue Ridge...................................................................................................44 Ridge and Valley.........................................................................................45 Piedmont......................................................................................................49 Implications of Environmental Setting on Prehistoric Farming Practices ..56 3 WOODSTOCK SITE DESCRIPTIONS .........................................................61 vi Etowah Mound Center (9BR1)....................................................................62 Summerour Mound (9FO16).......................................................................66 Large Villages .............................................................................................69 Smaller Settlements.....................................................................................87 4 REDIFINING WOODSTOCK CHRONOLOGY ...........................................94 Ceramic Type Descriptions.........................................................................94 Ceramic Analysis ......................................................................................102 Determining a Chronology........................................................................103 Revised Woodstock Chronology...............................................................109 5 SUBSISTENCE DATA.................................................................................115 The Relation between Subsistence and Cultural Changes ........................115 Subsistence Background............................................................................119 Current Understanding of Woodstock Subsistence...................................127 New Subsistence Analysis.........................................................................136 Interpretation of New Woodstock Subsistence Data.................................142 6 VESSEL FORM ANALYSIS........................................................................145 Vessel Forms and Subsistence Practices...................................................145 The Late Woodland Vessel Assemblage...................................................148 The Mississippian Vessel Assemblage......................................................151 Defining the Woodstock Vessel Assemblage ...........................................163 Vessel Forms .............................................................................................165 Comparison of Vessel Assemblages .........................................................171
Recommended publications
  • Senator Gooch of the 51St a RESOLUTION Recognizing The
    16 LC 39 1175 Senate Resolution 956 By: Senator Gooch of the 51st A RESOLUTION 1 Recognizing the Sautee and Nacoochee Valley Historic Districts and dedicating three roads 2 in their honor; and for other purposes. 3 WHEREAS, the Nacoochee Valley was the point of intersection of two major trails used by 4 early Native Americans, where a settlement was formed called Little Chota; and 5 WHEREAS, the Unicoi Trail passed through the Valley across Unicoi Gap going to 6 Hiawassee, North Carolina, East Tennessee, and then Kentucky, and the Rabun Trail began 7 with Coosa to Tugaloo River, Sautee Creek, and Bean Creek and then entered the Valley, 8 exiting at Dukes Creek to Dahlonega then Northeast Alabama; and 9 WHEREAS, the Sautee Valley, adjacent to the Nacoochee Valley, has its center point at 10 Highway 255 and Lynch Mountain Road; and 11 WHEREAS, a toll road was constructed by early settlers on the Unicoi Trail through the 12 Cherokee Nation and was called the Unicoi Turnpike; and 13 WHEREAS, gold was first discovered in 1828 in the Valley, then a part of Habersham 14 County, and in 1857, White County was cut out of Habersham; gold mining companies were 15 given permission by the Georgia Legislature in 1858 to put in hydraulic mining techniques 16 in the Valley; and 17 WHEREAS, Governor Hardman acquired the Nichols-Hunnicutt Hardman Estate with a 18 home and the Cherokee Native American Burial Mound in the Nacoochee Valley in 1903, 19 which is still one of the most photographed sites in Georgia; and 20 WHEREAS, massive timber companies operated in the Valley in the early 20th century, and 21 in the 1920s, the Smithsonian Museum excavated the Nacoochee Mound in the Valley and 22 found Cherokee Native American artifacts; and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National
    Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Heritage National Atchafalaya COMMISSION REVIEW- October 1, 2010 Vol. II SEPTEMBER 2011 Environmental Assessment Environmental Management Plan Note: This is a low resolution file of the painting, “Hope” to show artwork and placement. Artwork will be credited to Melissa Bonin, on inside front cover. AtchafalayaAtchafalaya NationalNational HeritageHeritage AreaArea MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEPT DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Front cover photo credit: Louisiana Office of Tourism NPS ABF/P77/107232 SEPTEMBER 2011 Printed on recycled paper Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Volume Two 1 2 CONTENTS OF VOLUME TWO CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS at 9GE162 O O
    o o ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT 9GE162 o o o by Marvin T. Smith University of Georgia o David J. Hally University of Georgia o o WALLACE RESERVOIR PROJECT CONTRIBUTION NUMBER 14 DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA o 1981 o • PREFACE • This report represents the final report for site 9GE162, the excavation of which was provided for in Appendix 9 of the Archaeological Salvage Agreement between the University of Georgia and the Georgia Power Company. • The initial draft of the artifact analysis sections was written by Marvin Smith. Hally edited these sections and wrote the sections • describing the site and its field investigations. w • • • • • i • o TABLE OF CONTENTS Page o Preface........................................................ ii INTRODUCTION. 1 RESEARCH DES IGN. 8 o FIELD METHODS AND SITE STRATIGRAPHy ........................... 9 ARTIFACTS. • . 16 SUMMARY OF RESULTS............................................. 25 o ETOWAH PERIOD POTTERY IN THE WALLACE RESERVOIR ................. 25 REFERENCES CITED............................................... 38 o LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Location of 9GE162 within the Wallace Reservoir............. 2 o 2. Location of GE162 at Lawrence Shoals ....................... 3 3. Map of GE162, Area G, showing excavation proveniences ....... 10 4. Etowan diamond motifs in the Wallace Reservoir .............. 30 o LIST OF TABLES Page o 1. Lithics from GE162 .......................................... 17 2. Non-flaked stone tools from GE162 ........................... 19 3. Ceramics from GE162... 20 o 4. Sherd type frequencies in the Armor and Stillhouse phases ... 28 5. Frequency of Etowah Complicated Stamped motifs in selected Etowah components, Wallace Reservoir ............... 31 o 6. Etowah phases in northwest Georgia .......................... 32 ii o o LIST OF PLATES o Plate 1. Northwest end of Weston-Reeves Island. Oconee River channel and islands to left.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Location G-Fr !7. I^-Fi M
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name_________________ historic Nacooehee Valley_______________________ 2. Location G-fr !7. i^-fi M street & number (See continuation sheet,) not for publication city, town Nacooehee and Sautee X vicinity of congressional district 9th - Ed Jenkins state Georgia code 13 county White code 311 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public x occupied x agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied _ x_ commercial park structure x both work in progress x educational x private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment _ x_ religious object in process x yes: restricted government scientific x being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation (in part) no military other- 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Owners (See attached list.) street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Superior Courts city, town Cleveland and Clarkesville 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Historic Structures Field Survey: title White County, Georgia_________ has this property been determined elegible? yes no date July-December, 1975 federal x state county local depository for survey records Historic Preservation Section, Ga. Dept. of Natural Resources city, town Atlanta 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered ?£ original site x good ruins _x_ altered moved elate fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance DESCRIPTION: HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL The Naeoochee Valley Historic District is located in White County, Georgia, in the northeastern section of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14
    ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report, North Shore Road Environment Impact Statement, Swan and Graham Counties, North
    CULTURAL RESOURCES EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT, NORTH SHORE ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, SWAIN AND GRAHAM COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA FINAL REPORT ARPA Permit GRSM 03-001 SEAC Accession No. 1850 Submitted to ARCADIS G&M OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. 800 Corporate Center, Suite 300 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 By TRC GARROW ASSOCIATES INC. 501 Washington Street, Suite F Durham, North Carolina 27701 Project No. 02427 Authored by Paul A. Webb with contributions by Heather L. Olson and David S. Leigh January 2004 ABSTRACT/MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Cultural resource background studies have been undertaken as part of the North Shore Road Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which is designed to determine the feasibility of and assess the potential environmental effects associated with fulfillment of a 1943 agreement among the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Swain County, and the state of North Carolina, calling for the construction of a road along the North Shore of Fontana Lake in western North Carolina. This road proposal originated in the early 1940s with the construction of TVA’s Fontana Lake in Swain and Graham counties. Due to the inundation of parts of the Little Tennessee and Tuckasegee valleys, road access was cut off to some 44,000 acres lying above the reservoir pool on the north side of the lake. Rather than construct a road to access the area during wartime conditions, the TVA acquired the entire 44,000-acre area and subsequently transferred its ownership to Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP). Although limited road construction took place between 1948 and the early 1970s, construction was stopped in 1972 due to environmental and engineering concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcoux, Jon Bernard
    CHEROKEE HOUSEHOLDS AND COMMUNITIES IN THE ENGLISH CONTACT PERIOD, A.D. 1670-1740 Jon Bernard Marcoux A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Chair: Vincas Steponaitis Advisor: Brett Riggs Reader: Brian Billman Reader: C. Margaret Scarry Reader: John Scarry ©2008 Jon Bernard Marcoux ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JON BERNARD MARCOUX: Cherokee Households and Communities in the English Contact Period, A.D. 1670-1740 (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis and Brett Riggs) This study focuses on issues of culture contact and the materialization of identity through an archaeological case study of a late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century Cherokee community located in eastern Tennessee. The English Contact period (ca. A.D. 1670-1740) was an extremely turbulent time for southeastern Indian groups marked by disease, warfare, and population movements. I examine how this chaotic period played out in the daily lives of Cherokee households. I use primary and secondary sources to develop an historical context for the English Contact period in the southeastern United States. I introduce a reliable way to identify English Contact period Cherokee occupations using pottery and glass trade bead data. I also consult artifact data in order to identify patterns associated with change and stability in the activities of daily life within Cherokee households. I find that daily life in Cherokee households changed dramatically as they coped with the shifting social, political, and economic currents of the English Contact period.
    [Show full text]