DOCSLIB.ORG

Inland Ports: 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inland Ports: 6 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-03/4083-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 2002 INLAND PORTS: 6. Performing Organization Code PLANNING SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENTS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jolanda Prozzi, Russell Henk, John McCray, Rob Harrison 4083-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 3208 Red River, Suite 200 0-4083 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2001 – August 2002 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract The consideration of multi-modal inland ports to enhance trade corridor performance and improve the efficiency of global supply chains is starting to emerge in the transportation community. Ultimately, it is believed that inland ports have the capability to create local employment, enhance corridor efficiencies and thus trade competitiveness, and reduce both public and private costs. The objective of 4083-1 was to create a classification methodology to better understand how different inland ports can support efficient supply chains and enhance corridor performance. The first year study recognized the importance of inland ports as international trade processing locations. In addition to this function, inland ports relieve congested traditional ports of entry, facilitate value-added services, and enhance local and regional development. The objectives of 4083-2 are to demonstrate the role and benefits of inland ports, provide a brief overview of the TxDOT highway planning and programming process, highlight the critical investments required and the level of TxDOT support that can expected as the inland port develop, consider the impacts of trade and trade truck flows on the locations of inland port developments, and finally, to propose an evaluation framework that allows TxDOT planners to review potential inland port investment requests from a transportation planning perspective. Given the multi- modal components of inland port developments, it is foreseen that the findings of this study can be used to inform transportation planners considering the location of multi-modal terminals on the proposed Trans Texas Corridors. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Inland ports, supply chain management, transportation No restrictions. This document is available to the planning, critical investments, evaluation public through the National Technical Information considerations Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. 19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 96 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Inland Ports: Planning Successful Developments Jolanda Prozzi Russell Henk John McCray Rob Harrison Research Report 4083-2 Research Project 0-4083 Impacts of Inland Ports on Trade Flows and Transportation in Texas Conducted for Texas Department of Transportation in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration by the Center for Transportation Research Bureau of Engineering Research The University of Texas at Austin October 2002 Disclaimers The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of either the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. There was no invention or discovery conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under this contract, including any art, method, process, machine manufacture, design or composition of matter, or any new useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States of America or any foreign country. NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. Robert Harrison Research Supervisor Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge the involvement and direction of the Texas Department of Transportation project monitoring committee, which includes Project Director Judy Friesenhahn (Advance Project Development Engineer) and Program Coordinator Luis A. Ramirez (District Engineer – Laredo). Thanks are also due to Dr. Khali Persad who provided valuable input in drafting the level of TxDOT support that can be expected at each of the various phases of the inland port development life cycle. The research team is also grateful for the assistance provided by Patricia Hord (CTR) and Maria Saenz-Farias (CTR) who provided editing and graphical assistance in the production of this document. Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Background................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Purpose........................................................................................................2 1.3 Organization of Report ............................................................................................3 2. The Role and Benefits of Inland Ports ..................................................................5 2.1 SOCIETAL BENEFITS..........................................................................................5 2.1.1 Economic Development............................................................................5 2.1.2 Employment Creation...............................................................................6 2.1.3 Increased Tax Revenues ...........................................................................7 2.1.4 Reduced Congestion and Environmental Pollution at Traditional Ports of Entry .........................................................................7 2.2 PRIVATE BENEFITS.............................................................................................7 2.2.1 Multi-Modal Transportation Access.........................................................8 2.2.2 Improved Supply Chain Management ......................................................9 2.3 PUBLIC AGENCY BENEFITS............................................................................11 2.3.1 Optimize Existing Port Capacity/Border Facilities.................................11 2.3.2 Leverage Private Funds...........................................................................11 2.3.3 Allow Modal Split away from Heavy Trucks.........................................12 3. TxDOT Highway Planning Process .....................................................................13 3.1 PARTICIPANTS IN THE PLANNING PROCESS .............................................13 3.2 TxDOT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS................................................14 3.3 FUNDING CATEGORY STRUCTURE..............................................................15 3.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS.................................................................................17 4. Critical Investments and Support Required for Inland Port Development .....................................................................................................19 4.1 PHASE 1: PREPARATION .................................................................................19 4.1.1 Inland Port Developer.............................................................................19 4.1.2 TxDOT Support......................................................................................23 4.2 PHASE 2: ESTABLISHMENT............................................................................24 4.2.1 Inland Port Developer.............................................................................24 4.2.2 TxDOT Support......................................................................................25 4.3 PHASE 3: EXPANSION......................................................................................26 4.3.1 Inland Port Developer.............................................................................26 4.3.2 TxDOT Support......................................................................................28 4.4 PHASE 4: STABILIZATION ..............................................................................29 4.4.1 Inland Port Developer.............................................................................29 4.4.2 TxDOT Support......................................................................................30 4.5 PHASE 5: DECLINE/ INNOVATION ................................................................30 4.5.1 Inland Port Developer.............................................................................30 4.5.2 TxDOT Support......................................................................................31 vii 4.6 CONCLUDING REMARKS.................................................................................31
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lakes Port & Harbor: Infrastructure & Dredging Cost Estimate Matrix Tool
    Great Lakes Port & Harbor: Infrastructure & Dredging Cost Estimate Matrix Tool and Duluth, MN/Superior, WI and Toledo, OH Case Studies Gene Clark1 and Dale Bergeron2 1 WI Sea Grant [email protected] 2 MN Sea Grant dbergeron@ d.umn.edu Defining the parameters of the Matrix Great Lakes ports, harbors and marinas are vulnerable to several potential climate change impacts. The two major impacts most relevant and potentially most costly are water level and storm intensity. Both rising and falling water levels can impact infrastructure stability and overall strength, as well as requiring additional channel dredging. A climatic change resulting in an increase in severe storms (more precipitation, higher winds and greater number of storm events) is also viewed as having detrimental affects on infrastructure. More severe storms can create larger waves, more extreme Seiche events and greater storm-surges that can damage port and harbor infrastructure requiring costly rehabilitation or replacement. In addition to infrastructure issues, an increased storm frequency and intensity will increase channel silting and sedimentation, compounding dredging problems analogous to lower water level scenarios. Climate model predictions for specific weather outcomes vary greatly throughout the Great Lakes Basin, and include both higher and lower water levels scenarios. However, all predictions seem to include an increase in both the number and intensity of major storm events. This combination can result in unanticipated water level change, larger waves, more dramatic Seiches and greater storm surges than considered in original design parameters (all of this in addition to the antiquated and sometime dilapidated state of our Great Lakes infrastructure).
    [Show full text]
  • All Aboard: the Aggregate Effects of Port Development
    All aboard: The aggregate effects of port development César Ducruet1, Réka Juhász2, Dávid Krisztián Nagy3, and Claudia Steinwender4 1CNRS 2Columbia University 3CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona GSE 4MIT Sloan ∗ July 3, 2019 Abstract This paper studies the distributional and aggregate economic effects of new port technologies developed in the second half of the 20th century. We show that new technologies have led to a significant reallocation of shipping activity from large to small cities. This was driven by a land price mechanism; as new port technologies are more land-intensive, ports moved from large, high land price cities to smaller, lower land price ones. We add endogenous port development to a standard quantitative model of cross- city trade to account for both the benefits and the costs of port development. According to the model, the adoption of new port technologies leads to benefits through increasing market access but is costly, requiring the extensive use of land, suggesting a reallocation of shipping activities towards cities with low land prices and thus net gains from new port technologies that are heterogeneous across cities. Counterfactual results suggest that new port technologies led to sizable aggregate gains for the world economy, with substantial heterogeneity in the effects across countries. More generally, accounting for the costs of port infrastructure development endogenously has the potential to alter the size and distribution of the gains from trade. ∗We thank David Atkin, Don Davis, Dave Donaldson, Joseph Doyle, Matt Grant, Gordon Hanson, Tom Holmes, Amit Khandelwal, Jim Rauch, Roberto Rigobon, Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and Tavneet Suri for helpful comments and discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission
    Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report KTC -14-11/MTIC1-14-1F Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. © 2014 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. Kentucky Transportation Center 176 Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 fax (859) 257-1815 www.ktc.uky.edu Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Prepared for: Multimodal Transportation & Infrastructure Consortium by the Kentucky Transportation Center 11/21/2014 This Page Left Intentionally Blank. Audit Template for Inland Port Sustainability Authors: Principal Investigator: Doug Kreis, PE, MBA, PMP Researcher(s): Sarah McCormack, MSc, CTL Research Engineer Christopher Van Dyke, MA Research Analyst Bryan Gibson, PhD Research Associate Multimodal Transportation and Infrastructure Consortium P.O. Box 5425 Huntington, WV 25703-0425 Phone: (304) 696-2313 • Fax: (304) 696-6088 Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes
    [Show full text]
  • SEASONS: the 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer
    TEAM GREER SEASONS: The 2012 Annual Report for the City of Greer The City of Greer, South Carolina Founded: 1876 Population: 25,515 (2010 Census) Government: Council City Administrator: Edward Driggers Mayor: Rick Danner City Council: Jay Arrowood Wayne Griffin* Kimberly Bookert Lee Dumas Wryley Bettis Judy Albert * - Mayor pro tempore Area: Total 21.76 square miles Land 19.99 square miles Water 1.77 square mile Elevation 1,024 ft. Departments: Administration Building and Development Standards Fire Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Police Public Services Fiscal Year 2012 Budget: $17,588,375 Greer City Council District Representatives DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 Jay Wayne Kimberly Lee Wryley Judy Arrowood Griffin Bookert Dumas Bettis Albert CONTENTS 9 6 New Map Caps Redistricting Process After seven months of work and public discussion about the 10 redistricting process, Greer City Council successfully completed the arduous task with the Department of Justice’s approval. 7 Transit Oriented Development 101 A national planner helped Upstate elected officials, planners, and residents consider the future of the Highway 29 corridor. 11 14 8 Students Connect with Upstate Soldiers Soldiers in Kosovo received a special Thanksgiving greeting from a group of young artists and wordsmiths in Greer. 9 Concussion Training for Coaches Injuries are nothing new to NFL players and concussions are at the top of the list. What happens when youth league 20 players emulate their heroes when it comes to taking hits? 10 City Website Among ‘Best of the Best’ Departmental Reports A new design and creative features helped the City of Greer 22 Finance website earn honors from the Horizon Interactive Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures 13 to 15 CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC GOODS
    Lectures 13 to 15 CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC GOODS 3.1: Public Goods Pure Private to Pure Public Good • Private good consumed only by one person: food, holidays, clothes • Family/household: all collective decisions and no market. ‘Micro- collective’. Share kitchens, TV, bathrooms. • Many families/household: roads and paths, communal halls, clubs etc. Tennis and golf clubs, plus Tidy Towns’ committees for example. ‘Mini- collective’. • Option public goods: fire brigade, hospitals, museums, etc. Provided by state but not used by all. ‘Partial full collective’ • Pure public goods benefit ALL. ‘Full collective’. National security, environment, lakes, sea and mountains. Used by all but to varying degrees. • Exclusion impossible. Raises free-rider problem: e.g. lighthouse, but now excludable. Firework display a good example (see later) • Public goods bring benefits just like private goods: Ui = F(A, B, C, D) • Same supply for ALL: G1=G2=G3= etc. Not same utility though. • Private good, A; same price and utility but different supply • Pure v impure PGs: security v bridge (Fig 3.1) • Fire brigade example (p. 144). Available to all, but only used when needed if ever. Private company would protect only those how had paid. • Public goods v natural monopolies (e.g. electricity or water) but private A fireworks display is a public good because it is non-excludable (impossible to prevent people from viewing it) and non-rivalrous (one individual's use does not reduce availability to others). Voluntary payment (Fig 3.3) • MC curve same as that for private goods (Fig 3.3): n people benefit though from every extra unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas U.S. Ports of Entry
    Texas U.S. Ports of Entry www.BusinessInTexas.com TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Overview U.S. Ports of Entry Ports of Entry are officially designated areas at U.S. For current or further information on U.S. and Texas land borders, seaports, and airports which are ports, check the CBP website at approved by U.S. Customs and Border Protection www.cbp.gov/border-security/ports-entry or contact (CBP). There are 328 official ports of entry in the the CBP at: U.S. and 13 preclearance offices in Canada and the Caribbean. 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20229 Port personnel are the face at the border for most Inquiries (877) 227-5511 cargo and visitors entering the United States. At International Callers (202)325-8000 Ports, CBP officers or Port employees accept entries of merchandise, clear passengers, collect duties, Texas Ports of Entry enforce the import and export laws and regulations of the U.S. federal government, and conduct Texas currently has 29 official U.S. ports of entry, immigration policy and programs. Ports also perform more than any other state, according to the CBP agriculture inspections to protect the nation from website. The map below provides details. potential carriers of animal and plant pests or diseases that could cause serious damage to the Information on the Texas ports of entry follows, in nation's crops, livestock, pets, and the environment. alphabetical order, in the next section. U.S. Ports of Entry In Texas 1 TEXAS PORTS OF ENTRY Texas Ports of Entry P ort of Entry: Addison Airport Port Information Port Code: 5584 Port Type: User Fee Airport Location Address: 4300 Westgrove Addison, TX 75001 General Phone: (469) 737-6913 General Fax: (469) 737-5246 Operational Hours: 8:30 AM-5:00 PM (Central) Weekdays (Monday-Friday) Brokers: View List Directions to Port Office DFW Airport: Take hwy 114 to Addison Airport Press Office Field Office Name: Houston Location Houston, TX Address: 2323 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Open Space - a Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Author: James Goettsch, CEO and Partner, Goettsch Partners Subjects: Architectural/Design Building Case Study Landscape Architecture Sustainability/Green/Energy Urban Design Publication Date: 2015 Original Publication: Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / James Goettsch Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Abstract James Goettsch CEO and Partner In urban centers dominated by tall buildings, access to outdoor space is important. We will Goettsch Partners, explain how two urban office building developments provide valuable outdoor open space in Chicago, USA different ways. In Chicago, the development involves transforming an open urban scar into one of the city’s largest public landscaped areas. The development is located on a key CBD site along the Chicago River. The result is a unique 52-story structure of which enclosed ground floor space James Goettsch, FAIA is the chairman and CEO of Goettsch Partners as well as the firm’s design director, responsible for occupies <25% of site area; offering public landscaped open space. Result: A Tower in the Park. developing the firm’s design talent and leading the direction In San Francisco, a developer is building a 42-story tower that covers virtually the entire site, with and quality for the office. He brings more than 40 years of professional experience and has personally directed all phases at-grade outdoor space limited to recessed entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoffman Park Hoffman Park Birds
    About Hoffman Park Hoffman Park Birds This 354-acre park is comprised of hardwood Location: Hoffman Park is located in Union A host of different bird species can be found in Township, west of Clinton and just south of the forests and fields, but Hoffman Park is Hoffman forest, grasslands, and many ponds of various sizes. The ponds were created in the 1940s by Interstate 78. The main parking area is at 26 probably best known among bird watchers for Albert and Joyce Hoffman for erosion Baptist Church Road, Hampton 08827. The endangered and threatened species that nest in control, crop irrigation, and cattle gate is open from 9:00 AM to sunset. A second its grassland habitat. These include Bobolinks, Park management when the park was a working parking lot is located at 751 Mechlin Corner Eastern Meadowlarks, Grasshopper Sparrows, farm. Albert Hoffman was the son of the Road, Hampton 08827. and Savannah Sparrows. Please keep pets on a founder of the Hoffman Beverage Company. leash as these birds nest directly on the ground Trail Map and Guide Directions from the East/Clinton area: and are highly susceptible to disturbance. Albert’s skilled innovations led to improvements in the sanitization, labeling, Take Route 78 west to exit 11. Follow the Eastern Bluebird nesting boxes and Wood and packaging of bottles. He also invented circle around to the left and cross over Route Duck boxes were erected in 2000 as part of a biological filters that extracted impurities 78, following the signs for Pattenburg. Boy Scout Eagle project. The bluebird boxes from concentrated sugar syrups.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Goods for Economic Development
    Printed in Austria Sales No. E.08.II.B36 V.08-57150—November 2008—1,000 ISBN 978-92-1-106444-5 Public goods for economic development PUBLIC GOODS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR ECONOMIC GOODS PUBLIC This publication addresses factors that promote or inhibit successful provision of the four key international public goods: fi nancial stability, international trade regime, international diffusion of technological knowledge and global environment. Each of these public goods presents global challenges and potential remedies to promote economic development. Without these goods, developing countries are unable to compete, prosper or attract capital from abroad. The undersupply of these goods may affect prospects for economic development, threatening global economic stability, peace and prosperity. The need for public goods provision is also recognized by the Millennium Development Goals, internationally agreed goals and targets for knowledge, health, governance and environmental public goods. Because of the characteristics of public goods, leaving their provision to market forces will result in their under provision with respect to socially desirable levels. Coordinated social actions are therefore necessary to mobilize collective response in line with socially desirable objectives and with areas of comparative advantage and value added. International public goods for development will grow in importance over the coming decades as globalization intensifi es. Corrective policies hinge on the goods’ properties. There is no single prescription; rather, different kinds of international public goods require different kinds of policies and institutional arrangements. The Report addresses the nature of these policies and institutions using the modern principles of collective action. UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Zoning Modifications Per HB 2001
    Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Daniel Echeverria, [email protected], 801-535-7165 Tracy Tran, [email protected], 801-535-7645 Date: September 26, 2018 Re: PLNPCM2018-00601 Inland Port Text Amendments Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: Multiple PARCEL ID: Multiple MASTER PLAN: Northwest Quadrant, Northwest ZONING DISTRICT: Multiple REQUEST: A proposal by Mayor Jackie Biskupski to modify zoning requirements related to inland port land uses as required by Utah Code 11-58-205(5). This statute gives the City until December 31, 2018 to allow an inland port and associated uses as permitted or conditional uses subject to standards that are determined by the municipality and consistent with the policies and objectives of the inland port authority. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings of this report, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed zoning text amendments meet the standards for a zoning ordinance amendment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a favorable recommendation of petition PLNPCM2018-00601 to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Inland Port Jurisdictional Lands and Zoning Map B. Proposed Inland Port Overlay Zoning Ordinance Text C. Northwest Quadrant Overlay Zoning for Reference D. Conditional Use Standards for Reference E. M-1 Zoning District Land Use Table for Reference F. Analysis of Standards G. Department Review Comments H. Suggested Lighting Ordinance (from David Scheer) I. Public Process and Comments SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLCGOV.COM PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLNPCM2018-00601 1 Date Published: 9/20/2018 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This zoning text amendment proposal was initiated by Mayor Jackie Biskupski in response to the State Legislature adopting modifications to Utah Code 11-58 “Utah Inland Port Authority Act” (HB2001) during a special session of the legislature held in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park B.S., Hotel Administration, 2013 Cornell University Submitt
    Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park B.S., Hotel Administration, 2013 Cornell University Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2020 ©2020 Sun Jung Park All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ Center for Real Estate August 13, 2020 Certified by_______________________________________________________________ Dr. Andrea M. Chegut Research Scientist, Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor Accepted by______________________________________________________________ Professor Dennis Frenchman Class of 1922 Professor of Urban Design and Planning Department or Urban Studies and Planning Director, MIT Center for Real Estate Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate on August 13, 2020 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT Big data and the increasing usage of data science is changing the way the real estate industry is functioning. From pricing estimates and valuation to marketing and leasing, the power of predictive analytics is improving the business processes and presenting new ways of operating. The field of affordable housing development, however, has often lacked investment and seen delays in adopting new technology and data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Creek Regional Park
    4.3 Mi.(6.9 Km) to Spur Cross Ranch from park boundary Maricopa Trail h s STATE a YIELD W TO e h 2807 c .0 a 1 24 2602 7) 00 p (1. A 9 . ) Gunsight 2666 0 4 . 400 PRIV ATE 1 Pass 2 ( 2600 GJ 2800 ) s 3060 r e s t STATE e e GJ il M m lo 2357 0 .4 i 0 1 K Go John 9 6 . 2 1 .3 0 ) ( . 2 5 1 1 ( Mountain . West (1 8 0.2 ) Boundary 24 P. A. Seitts (0.4) Maricopa Trail 00 Spur 2788 Preserve at Go 2785 John Canyon 400 2 6 n 0. ) Joh C .0 Go an ) (1 2 y . 4 See reverse .7 . 5 o OV 0 0 . 0 0 n ) ( for details .1 FR ) (1 0.3 (0.8 0 0.9 2347 .5 (0. (0 0.7 4) (1.5) .8 CM 2557 1 ) (1.1) JS .1 V ( 0.2 0 1.8) 220 0. 8 ) (0.3) 6 . No horses west 2 ( 0 . of Clay Mine 1.0 1 Clay ay ) ( kw SL r y y Mine Pa 2 STATE 2 r a 00 QZ W 0.8 a t ( ` ( 0 i 1 0 l .3 . O ) k . 1 i e 2 r l e iv r 2610 ) M e i C 0. p Y n e 2 6 e 2093 0 s v 0 ( a A 1 a 0 .0 J Z v C ) n Slat 7 L STATE e a 0.4 v 2288 Rodeo La (0.6) Arena M ainte nanc e 2711 t 2 2 1 S 0 .5 0 ( 2 k d .
    [Show full text]