Congressional Record—House H4913
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
June 22, 1998 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H4913 The CHAIRMAN. Is there objection 1999, and for other purposes, which was Mr. MCDADE. Mr. Chairman, I yield to the request of the gentleman from referred to the Union Calendar and or- myself such time as I may consume. California? dered to be printed. I rise in support of the energy and There was no objection. The SPEAKER pro tempore. All water bill making appropriations for The CHAIRMAN. Are there any points of order are reserved on the bill. fiscal year 1999. I want to point out to amendments? f my colleagues that this bill was re- If not, the Clerk will read the last ported about a week ago unanimously two lines of the bill. REPORT ON H.R. 4104, TREASURY by the Committee on Appropriations, The Clerk read as follows: DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES and just about a week before that it This Act may be cited as the ``Military POSTAL SERVICE, EXECUTIVE was also reported unanimously by our Construction Appropriations Act, 1999''. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND subcommittee. The CHAIRMAN. If there are no fur- INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPRO- We in the subcommittee had a tre- ther amendments, pursuant to the rule, PRIATION ACT, 1999 mendous challenge this year, a tough the Committee rises. Mr. LIVINGSTON, from the Commit- bill, difficult to work, primarily be- Accordingly, the Committee rose; tee on Appropriations, submitted a cause we had a budget that was inad- and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. BE- privileged report (Rept. No. 105±592) on equate. REUTER) having assumed the chair, Mr. the bill (H.R. 4104) making appropria- I do not believe there was a scintilla PEASE, Chairman of the Committee of tions for the Treasury Department, the of doubt among the membership that the Whole House on the State of the United States Postal Service, the Exec- when we saw the budget for the Corps Union, reported that that Committee, utive Office of the President, and cer- of Engineers particularly we knew that having had under consideration the bill tain Independent Agencies, for the fis- we could not execute it. But the Mem- (H.R. 4059) making appropriations for cal year ending September 30, 1999, and bers hunkered down, on both sides of military construction, family housing, for other purposes, which was referred the aisle, and re-wrote this bill, Mr. and base realignment and closure for to the Union Calendar and ordered to Chairman, from the bottom up. We re- the Department of Defense for the fis- be printed. ordered priorities, we focused resources cal year ending September 30, 1999, and The SPEAKER pro tempore. All on areas of investment promising the for other purposes, pursuant to House points of order are reserved on the bill. greatest returns, we demanded greater Resolution 477, he reported the bill f efficiencies, and produced a bill that in back to the House. my view is both fiscally responsive and The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under GENERAL LEAVE protective of so many interests within the rule, the previous question is or- Mr. MCDADE. Mr. Speaker, I ask the jurisdiction of the Subcommittee dered. unanimous consent that all Members on Energy and Water Development. The question is on the engrossment may have 5 legislative days in which to Total spending on the bill is $20.65 and third reading of the bill. revise and extend their remarks on the billion. That represents a reduction of The bill was ordered to be engrossed bill, H.R. 4060, making appropriations $80 million from fiscal year 1998 and and read a third time, and was read the for energy and water development for $649 million below the budget request. third time. the fiscal year ending September 30, Of the total amount, $11.8 billion, just about 60 percent of every penny spent b 1715 1999, and for other purposes, and that I be permitted to include tabular and ex- in this bill, is for the atomic energy de- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. BE- traneous material. fense activities of the Department of REUTER). The question is on the pas- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there Energy. The remaining $8.7 billion is sage of the bill. objection to the request of the gen- for domestic programs, and it rep- Pursuant to clause 7 of rule XV, the tleman from Pennsylvania? resents a decrease of $473 million from yeas and nays are ordered. There was no objection. the current fiscal year and $284 million Pursuant to clause 5 of rule I, further f from the budget request. proceedings are postponed until later Mr. Chairman, I just want to point today. ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOP- out to my colleagues in the House that f MENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, in reordering those priorities that we 1999 talked about, we looked at highly sig- GENERAL LEAVE The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- nificant projects that we could com- Mr. PACKARD. Mr. Speaker, I ask ant to House Resolution 478 and rule plete in an efficient and effective way. unanimous consent that all Members XXIII, the Chair declares the House in My colleagues will see this bill unani- may have 5 legislative days within the Committee of the Whole House on mously appropriating $63 million for which to revise and extend their re- the State of the Union for consider- the Los Angeles harbor project, and $60 marks on the bill (H.R. 4059) making ation of the bill, H.R. 4060. million for the Houston-Galveston appropriations for military construc- navigation project, and $60 million for tion, family housing, and base realign- b 1718 the L.A. County drainage area project, ment and closure for the Department IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE where human lives are at stake and of Defense for the fiscal year ending Accordingly, the House resolved where people of lower incomes have September 30, 1999, and for other pur- itself into the Committee of the Whole been forced to pay ever-rising insur- poses, and that I may include tabular House on the State of the Union for the ance costs to try to stay in their and extraneous material. consideration of the bill (H.R. 4060) homes. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there making appropriations for energy and We have completed a work that rep- objection to the request of the gen- water development for the fiscal year resents a togetherness on the sub- tleman from California? ending September 30, 1999, and for committee and on the full committee, There was no objection. other purposes, with Mr. BARRETT of and that respects the necessary pro- f Nebraska in the chair. grams to keep this Nation strong. The Clerk read the title of the bill. There is, as far as I know, and I think REPORT ON H.R. 4103, DEPART- The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to the I can speak with authority, no dissent MENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIA- rule, the bill is considered as having from any member of the committee on TIONS ACT, 1999 been read the first time. this bill. I hope that all Members will Mr. LIVINGSTON, from the Commit- Under the rule, the gentleman from support this bill. tee on Appropriations, submitted a Pennsylvania (Mr. MCDADE) and the Mr. Chairman: I rise in support of the En- privileged report (Rept. No. 105±591) on gentleman from Texas (Mr. EDWARDS) ergy and Water Development Appropriations the bill (H.R. 4103) making appropria- each will control 30 minutes. Bill for fiscal year 1999. The bill was reported tions for the Department of Defense for The Chair recognizes the gentleman without dissent by the Committee on Appro- the fiscal year ending September 30, from Pennsylvania (Mr. MCDADE). priations last Tuesday, June 16. H4914 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE June 22, 1998 The Committee has facedÐand, I believe, les County Drainage Area project; $15 million commitment is to cleaning up the environ- has metÐa tremendous challenge in assem- for construction and operation and mainte- mental degradation that is the legacy of dec- bling a responsible bill within the constraints of nance of the Boston Harbor project; and doz- ades of nuclear weapons production. The bill a significantly reduced allocation for domestic ens more. provides over $6.3 billion for environmental discretionary programs. By reordering budg- By focusing on the traditional and vital mis- restoration and waste management activities etary priorities, focusing resources on areas of sions of flood control, navigation and shoreline of the Department of Energy. investment promising the greatest returns, and protection, the Commission has drawn a sharp The non-defense activities of the DOE are demanding greater efficiencies from program distinction between its priorities and those of funded at or near fiscal year 1998 levels. One managers, we have produced a bill that is the Administration. Still, we labored under seri- notable exception is funding for domestic both fiscally responsible and protective of the ous budget constraints, and as a con- science programs, which were increased by vital services within the jurisdiction of the Sub- sequence, we were unable to fund new starts $164 million (or 7 percent) to provide first year committee on Energy and Water Develop- in the Construction, General account of the funding for construction of the Spallation Neu- ment. Corps of Engineers. tron Source in Tennessee, and additional Total spending in the bill is $20.65 billion, a The Committee acknowledges that there are funding to operate existing science facilities. reduction of $80 million from fiscal year 1998 many very worthy projects that were unable to and $649 million from the budget request. Of receive funding because of the Administra- Title IV of the bill funds independent agen- the total amount, $11.8 billionÐapproximately tion's opposition to beach renourishment cies.