Huckleberry and Ecology Management Research in the Pacific

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Huckleberry and Ecology Management Research in the Pacific CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. 1 FIELD RESEARCH IN THE MOUNT ADAMS AREA. ................ 4 History ............................... 4 1972Experiment. .......................... 5 Area Description ......................... 5 Objectives ............................ 9 Experimental Design. ....................... 9 Treatments ............................ 9 Data Collection and Processing .................. 13 Results .............................. 14 Conclusions. ........................... 22 Additional Mount Adams Field Research ................ 24 FIELD RESEARCH IN THE MOUNT HOOD AREA ................. 25 Area Description. .......................... 25 Bulldoze-and-Burn Experiment. .................... 26 Objectives ............................ 26 Experimental Design. ....................... 28 Treatment. ............................ 28 Data Collection and Processing .................. 29 Results .............................. 29 Conclusions. ........................... 29 Karbutilate Experiment. ....................... 29 Objective. ............................ 29 Experimental Design. ....................... 29 Treatments ............................ 32 Data Collection and Processing .................. 32 Results .............................. 32 Conclusions. ........................... 34 Five-Treatment Grid ......................... 34 Objective. ............................ 34 Experimental Design. ....................... 34 Treatments ............................ 34 Data Collection and Processing .................. 36 Results .............................. 36 Conclusions. ........................... 41 LABORAlIORYRESEARCH..... 43 DISCUSSION. 45 MANAGEMENTRECOMMENDATIONS. 47 LITERATURECITED............................ 49 This page was intentionally left blank . - _--_ _.-- - ..- -, -._ For centuries before men prevented or controlled in recent learned to prevent and control years, and Indian-set fires have them, wildfires periodically raced not burned over the most heavily through northwestern forests. used, high-elevation, huckleberry Often destroying the forests on fields for several generations. As large areas in catastrophic burns, a result, trees of low timber these wildfires frequently created quality have been invading many open, tree-free environments above high quality huckleberry fields 3,000 ft (914 m) that were suitable (figs. 1 and 2). These trees for the growth and development of eventually form dense subalpine wild huckleberries. Some of the forests that crowd and shade the resulting huckleberry fields were shrubs, eventually eliminating heavily used by Indians. huckleberry production. Indians apparently dried their Berry production is surpris- huckleberries by placing them near ingly high in some of the fields. campfires or slowly burning rotten We measured a yield of 100 gal per logs ignited for that purpose. acre (935 1 per ha) on one high Some years, when dry conditions and quality huckleberry area in 1976. high winds were favorable, these In 1977, when overall berry pro- drying fires may have spread and duction tended to be poorer, reburned the berry fields. The another area produced 77 gal per Indians also may have deliberately acre (720 1 per ha). Fresh set fires to reburn the heavily huckleberries sold for $10.00-11.00 used fields during dry, windy per gal ($2.64-2.90 per 1) in periods. In any event, periodic 1977. Most berry pickers do not fires kept trees out of many pick every berry on an area, but huckleberry fields and created new picking only half the berries would fields where postfire environmental have produced economic yields of conditions were favorable for over $300 per acre ($741 per ha) on huckleberry growth. several areas sampled in 1977. Twelve blueberry-like huckle- berry species grow in Oregon and Washington (Minore 1972), and huckleberry fields occupy over 100,000 acres (40 469 ha) in these two states. 1/ Unfortunately, this acreage is dwindling. Most large wildfires have been effectively lGerhart H. Nelson. Huckleberry management. 4 P. May 14, 1970. (Unpublished, on file at USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Portland, Oreg.) Figure 1. --A portion of the Sawtooth huckleberry field near Mount Adams, Washington in 1938. Note snags and open aspect. 2 Figure 2.-- The same area shown in figure 1, 34 years later. These two photographs, taken at the same point, illustrate the rapid invasion by trees of this highly productive huckleberry field. Subalpine forest will soon reduce berry production. I 3 FIELD RESEARCH IN THE MOUNT ADAMS / -AREA Economic yields do not ade- History quately reflect the importance of the northwestern huckleberry The huckleberry fields near resource, however, for the in- Mount Adams have been heavily used tangible values of fresh air, by berry pickers for many years. mountain scenery, and berry buckets Members of the expedition led by they have filled themselves are far Captain George B. McClellan noted more important than market values the extensive burned-over areas in I to most huckleberry pickers. Many this vicinity and found many people pick berries just for fun. Indians picking and drying berries i I Over a thousand vehicles were there in 1853. One member re- * I tallied in one ranger district's collected "a full tribe" and wrote berry fields during a single "I never saw so many (Indians) and huckleberry-season weekend in 1971. so ma kinds of berries in all my On another district, 163,000 life" 2/ visitor-days were recorded in one heavily used field during 1969 (see Eighty-one years later, in footnote 1). 1934, an animal exclosure was constructed to monitor the effects Considered either economically of grazing in the berry fields. or recreationally, deterioration of Vegetation within the exclosure and the northwestern huckleberry on an adjacent unfenced plot was observed yearly until 1942. The resource is serious. Several factors are involved: natural Forest Service observers concluded that sheep benefited the berries by succession in the, absence of reducing vegetative competition and wildfires; huckleberry regener- lightly browsing the huckleberry ation, growth, and berry produc- 3 shrubs. / In 1937, all trees were tion; meteorological effects; and the regeneration, growth, and competition of associated species. Seeking a better understanding of these factors, we studied huckle- berries from 1972 through 1977. Field phenomena were investigated in two areas near Mount Adams, 2George Henry C. Hodges. Personal recollec- Washington, and Mount Hood, Oregon. tion. Page 146, Washington State Historical We conducted laboratory and green- Society Publication. Volume 2, 1907 to 1914. (On file at USDA Forest Service Gifford Pinchot house studies at the USDA Forestry National Forest. Vancouver, Wash.) Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, 3K. C. Langfield. Effect of grazing on Oregon. This report is a summary huckleberry production. 2 p. December 9. of the research at all three 1942. (Unpublished, on file at Mount Adams locations during the 6-year study. Ranger District, Trout Lake, Wash.) -__-.----- ---. .------ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ felled on 5 acres (2 ha) of berry field in the same Mount Adams area. 4/ Later (1963), more trees AREA DESCRIPTION were felled, and 6 acres were disked in an attempt to control We established a vegetation vegetative competition. 5/ Berry control experiment 13 mi. (21 km) production was not measured on southwest of Mount Adams during the these felled or disked areas, but summer of 1972 in sec. 16, T. 7 N., disking apparently stimulated R. 8 E. Located in a portion of rhizome sprouting. A huckleberry the Sawtooth Huckleberry Field management plan was formulated for already invaded by subalpine the Mount Adams huckleberry re- forest, this experimental area is source in 1968, but never imple- at an elevation of 4,000 ft. mented (see footnote 5). (1 219 m), with a gently sloping WSW aspect. Lodgepole pine, Dr. Perry C. Crandall (Wash- western white pine, subalpine fir, ington State University, personal Douglas-fir, mountain hemlock, and communication, March 17, 1972) Engelmann spruce comprise most of applied replicated herbicide the forest canopy (see table 1, treatments near Mount Adams in fig. 3).61 1969. He found that Casaron, The 1972 experimental area Simazine, Atrazine, and Paraquat occupies soil that is shallow, were ineffective in selectively coarse-textured, gravelly, low in controlling vegetation competing nutrients (table 2), and subject to with huckleberries. Crandall's erosion. Invading trees are short huckleberry pruning trials (50 and poorly formed, often showing percent and 80 percent top removal) considerable snow damage. Snow were also ineffective, damaging the packs usually are deep and long- huckleberry shrubs rather than lasting, and the growing season is improving them. cool and short. 4George A. Bright. Buckleberry release from reproduction. 3 p. September 24, 1937. (Unpublished, on file at Mount Adams Ranger Station, Trout Lake, Wash.) 5 Donald E. Wermlinger. Twin Buttes huckle- berry management plan. 25 p. January 5, 1968. (Unpublished, on file at Mount Adams Ranger 6Table 1 lists scientific names for all plants Station, Trout Lake, Wash.) mentioned in this report. 5 - -_ -_ . -. ., . _ . , .- .- Table l--Names of plants 1/ Common name Scientific name Agoseris , orange Agoseris aurantiaca Greene Beadlily, Queencup Clintonia uniflora (Schult.) Kunth Beargrass Xerophyllum tenax (Pursh) Nutt. Blueberry, eastern lowbush Vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Bramble, dwarf Rubus lasiococcus Gray Bunchberry Cornus canadensis L. Cinquefoil, Drummond
Recommended publications
  • Porcelain Berry Are Aggressive , Growing Quickly to PORCELAIN Form Large Mats Over Existing Vegetation
    The vines of porcelain berry are aggressive , growing quickly to PORCELAIN form large mats over existing vegetation. It easily climbs up and around BERRY trees, shading out shrubs and seedlings of native plants . (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata) CHARACTERISTICS WHERE FROM WHERE FOUND Y Porcelain berry is a woody, Native to Japan and China, Porcelain berry can be F perennial vine which can this plant was brought to found in southern New I grow up to 20 feet or more, North America in 1870 as England, the Mid-Atlantic T and closely resembles native an ornamental and land - and parts of the South and grapevine. The center, or scaping plant. Midwest. It can be found N pith, is white. Its bark has in varying conditions, from lenticels (light colored dots) dry to moist areas, along E and will not peel, unlike forest edges and streams, grape bark which does not as well as areas receiving PORCELAIN BERRY FOLIAGE D Karan A. Rawlins, University of Georgia, have lenticels and will full sunlight to partial shade. Bugwood.org I y peel or shred. It uses non- c Porcelain berry is not n a adhesive tendrils to climb. v tolerant of fully shaded sites r e s n Leaves are alternate and or wet soils. o C broadly ovate with a heart- e n i w shaped base. Leaves have y d n 3–5 lobes and toothed a r B PORCELAIN BERRY FRUITS margins. Porcelain berry | James H. Miller, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org Y produces small, hard berries R R E varying in color from pale B N I violet to green, to a bright A L E blue.
    [Show full text]
  • Porcelain Berry
    FACT SHEET: PORCELAIN-BERRY Porcelain-berry Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Maxim.) Trautv. Grape family (Vitaceae) NATIVE RANGE Northeast Asia - China, Korea, Japan, and Russian Far East DESCRIPTION Porcelain-berry is a deciduous, woody, perennial vine. It twines with the help of non-adhesive tendrils that occur opposite the leaves and closely resembles native grapes in the genus Vitis. The stem pith of porcelain-berry is white (grape is brown) and continuous across the nodes (grape is not), the bark has lenticels (grape does not), and the bark does not peel (grape bark peels or shreds). The Ieaves are alternate, broadly ovate with a heart-shaped base, palmately 3-5 lobed or more deeply dissected, and have coarsely toothed margins. The inconspicuous, greenish-white flowers with "free" petals occur in cymes opposite the leaves from June through August (in contrast to grape species that have flowers with petals that touch at tips and occur in panicles. The fruits appear in September-October and are colorful, changing from pale lilac, to green, to a bright blue. Porcelain-berry is often confused with species of grape (Vitis) and may be confused with several native species of Ampelopsis -- Ampelopsis arborea and Ampelopsis cordata. ECOLOGICAL THREAT Porcelain-berry is a vigorous invader of open and wooded habitats. It grows and spreads quickly in areas with high to moderate light. As it spreads, it climbs over shrubs and other vegetation, shading out native plants and consuming habitat. DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES Porcelain-berry is found from New England to North Carolina and west to Michigan (USDA Plants) and is reported to be invasive in twelve states in the Northeast: Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Washington D.C., West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Definitions and Classifications for Fruit and Vegetables
    Chapter 1 Definitions and classifications for fruit and vegetables In the broadest sense, the botani- Botanical and culinary cal term vegetable refers to any plant, definitions edible or not, including trees, bushes, vines and vascular plants, and Botanical definitions distinguishes plant material from ani- Broadly, the botanical term fruit refers mal material and from inorganic to the mature ovary of a plant, matter. There are two slightly different including its seeds, covering and botanical definitions for the term any closely connected tissue, without vegetable as it relates to food. any consideration of whether these According to one, a vegetable is a are edible. As related to food, the plant cultivated for its edible part(s); IT botanical term fruit refers to the edible M according to the other, a vegetable is part of a plant that consists of the the edible part(s) of a plant, such as seeds and surrounding tissues. This the stems and stalk (celery), root includes fleshy fruits (such as blue- (carrot), tuber (potato), bulb (onion), berries, cantaloupe, poach, pumpkin, leaves (spinach, lettuce), flower (globe tomato) and dry fruits, where the artichoke), fruit (apple, cucumber, ripened ovary wall becomes papery, pumpkin, strawberries, tomato) or leathery, or woody as with cereal seeds (beans, peas). The latter grains, pulses (mature beans and definition includes fruits as a subset of peas) and nuts. vegetables. Definition of fruit and vegetables applicable in epidemiological studies, Fruit and vegetables Edible plant foods excluding
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Non-Timber Forest Products Harvest Manual for Commercial Harvest on State-Owned Lands
    Alaska Non-Timber Forest Products Harvest Manual For Commercial Harvest on State-Owned Lands State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining, Land and Water April 2, 2008 - 1 - State of Alaska Non-Timber Forest Product Commercial Harvest Manual, April 2, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Special notices, clarifications, and general rules 4 Procedure for revision 5 Products and species descriptions 6 Bark birch 7 cedar 8 various species 9 Berries and berry-like fruits 10 Branches and stems of deciduous woody species 11 Buds and tips 12 Burls and galls 13 Cones 14 Conks 15 Cuttings – willow, dogwood & poplar 16 Diamond willow 17 Evergreen boughs 18 Floral greenery 19 Leaves and flowers of woody plants 20 Lichens ground-growing 21 tree-growing 22 Mosses and liverworts 23 Mushrooms 24 Non-woody perennial plants tender edible shoots, stems, leaves, and/or flowers 25 mature stems, leaves and flowers 26 Roots edible or medicinal 27 for fiber 28 Seed heads 29 Seeds 30 Transplants plugs 31 shrubby perennial with root ball 32 sprigs 33 tree sapling with root ball 34 Appendix I: Plants never allowed for harvest 35 Appendix II: Guidelines for non over-the-counter permit products 36 Glossary 38 Selected references 39 - 2 - State of Alaska Non-Timber Forest Product Commercial Harvest Manual, April 2, 2008 Introduction Non-timber forest products are generally defined as products derived from biological resources. Examples of non-timber forest products may include mushrooms, conks, boughs, cones, leaves, burls, landscaping transplants, roots, flowers, fruits, and berries. Not included are minerals, rocks, soil, water, animals, and animal parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Landscape Ecology to Improve Strawberry Sap Beetle
    Applying Landscape The lack of effective con- trol measures for straw- Ecology to Improve berry sap beetle is a problem at many farms. Strawberry Sap Beetle The beetles appear in strawberry fi elds as the Management berries ripen. The adult beetle feeds on the un- Rebecca Loughner and Gregory Loeb derside of berries creat- Department of Entomology ing holes, and the larvae Cornell University, NYSAES, Geneva, NY contaminate harvestable he strawberry sap beetle (SSB), fi eld sanitation, and renovating promptly fruit leading to consumer Stelidota geminata, is a significant after harvest. Keeping fi elds suffi ciently complaints and the need T insect pest in strawberry in much of clean of ripe and overripe fruit is nearly the Northeast. The small, brown adults impossible, especially for U-pick op- to prematurely close (Figure 1) are approximately 1/16 inch in erations, and the effectiveness of the two length and appear in strawberry fi elds as labeled pyrethroids in the fi eld is highly fi elds at great cost to the the berries ripen. The adult beetle feeds variable. Both Brigade [bifenthrin] and grower. Our research has on the underside of berries creating holes. Danitol [fenpropathrin] have not provided Beetles prefer to feed on over-ripe fruit but suffi cient control in New York and since shown that the beetles do will also damage marketable berries. Of they are broad spectrum insecticides they not overwinter in straw- more signifi cant concern, larvae contami- can potentially disrupt predatory mite nate harvestable fruit leading to consumer populations that provide spider mite con- berry fi elds.
    [Show full text]
  • Berry Fruit Berry Fruit Characteristics
    Mitcham, Beth "Berries: Postharvest Handling Systems" Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops Short Course 2015 6/17/2015 (c) Postharvest Technology Center, UC Regents Berry Fruit Berry Fruit Characteristics • Harvest fully ripe for flavor • Shelf life limited by decay and softening; Raspberry Strawberry loss of flavor • High in antioxidants Blueberry Blackberry The Strawberry is an Achene Fruit Morphological Characteristics • Simple fruits – Berries • Blueberry, cranberry, currant, gooseberry – Drupe • Huckleberry • Multiple fruits – Mulberry • Aggregate – Drupe • Blackberry, loganberry, raspberry – Achene • strawberry Respiration Rates and Ethylene Production Fruit Respiration Respiration Ethylene @ 0°C @ 20°C @ 5°C Blackberry 22 155 <0.1 Blueberry 6 68 0.1 to 1.0 Cranberry 3 18 Raspberry 24 200 Strawberry 15 127 <0.1 Currant 16 130 Gooseberry 10 58 1 Mitcham, Beth "Berries: Postharvest Handling Systems" Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops Short Course 2015 6/17/2015 (c) Postharvest Technology Center, UC Regents Strawberries Growing on Raised Beds Beds Covered in Plastic Harvest, Sort, and Pack in the Field Eight One Pound Clamshell Baskets Nesting of Botrytis Rot One Bad Berry can Destroy the Whole Tray Raspberries 2 Mitcham, Beth "Berries: Postharvest Handling Systems" Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops Short Course 2015 6/17/2015 (c) Postharvest Technology Center, UC Regents Gentle Harvest by Hand Harvest into small containers to avoid bruising! Picking early in the day Caneberry Harvest Operation or while
    [Show full text]
  • Porcelain Berry (Ampelopsis Brevipedunculata)
    Porcelain berry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata) Legal Classification in Wisconsin: Prohibited Invasive Species The largest known population of this species in Wisconsin has been found on the west side of Madison: Owen and Kettle Pond Parks and nearby neighborhoods. The time to control it is NOW! Porcelain berry is a highly invasive, deciduous, woody, climbing vine in the grape family. It grows well in most soils, and in full sun to partial shade. This plant can kill trees and reduce property values & impact forests. • Grows quickly and can twine up to 25’ high on trees! • Climbs over vegetation, shading out shrubs and trees. • Invades open, edge and wooded habitats. • Spreads by birds and mammals dispersing seeds. • Resprouts after being cut, and new seedlings may emerge for several years. • Increases the possibility for wind and ice damage to trees. How to identify: • LEAVES are simple and alternate, with a heart-shaped base and coarsely toothed edges. Leaves may be entire or have 3‐5 palmate lobes or be deeply dissected.The underside of leaves have small hairs. • FLOWERS bloom mid-summer and are greenish‐white and inconspicuous. They form in broad, upright clusters. • FRUIT appear September-October. They are hard berries, 1/4” to 1/3” with small spots. Vary in color from green, white, pink, lavender and blue. Fruit flesh is white. • BARK has raised, light dots called lenticels and does not peel. Older vines have flaky, fissured, brown or grayish bark. Inner stem tissue is continuous across nodes. • ROOT is woody, fibrous, large and branched. Roots can re-sprout. How to distinguish from lookalikes, native grapes and Virginia creeper: Native grapes (Vitis spp.) are also climbing woody vines, but..
    [Show full text]
  • The Berry College Longleaf Pine Project
    The Berry College Longleaf Pine Project Restoration of Mountain Longleaf Pine on the World’s Largest College Campus Martin L. Cipollini, PhD. Dana Professor of Biology Berry College Origins of the Berry College Longleaf Pine Project • 1995 Roger Birkhead’s independent study showed we had trees > 200 years old • 1999 Plant Ecology class initiated long-term census work • 2001 SAVE club responded to logging with a tree planting event • 2002 management plan developed by Karen Vaughn as an extension of a Plant Ecology project Why develop a management plan? • Longleaf pine is an ICUN Red List Endangered Species, occupying only about 2% of their original 92 million acre range. • Old trees and late 1800’s maps suggested widespread longleaf pine community on Lavender Mountain. • Few new trees since 1920s-1930s – local population was in decline. • Burning had been restricted for 60-70 yrs, resulting in hardwood encroachment, fuel buildup, and near total loss of understory plants. • Most of mountain was never plowed, suggesting that recovery of understory plants might be possible (seed bank). • Southern Pine Beetle (SPB) and wildfires are common problems with loblolly and shortleaf pine forests on campus. • Most importantly, the college campus context gave an excellent opportunity to engage in a variety of service-learning opportunities. Longleaf Pine Life Cycle Seeds germinate on bare soil Only grows upward in open Remain in “grass” stage for several conditions years Can live up to 500 years Longleaf Pine is adapted to periodic surface fires . Causes of fire . Adaptations . Lightning strikes . Resistant grass stage . Native Americans and post . Fast height growth 1830s settlers .
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Retail Berry Marketing
    Issued By: Hillphoenix Learning Center Title: The Challenges of Retail Berry Marketing The Challenges of Retail Berry Marketing Over the past decade consumers have become increasingly health-conscious. More than two-thirds of them today say that it is important to eat healthy and pay attention to nutrition.1 Interest in so-called “superfoods” has been increasing and none of these is considered more super than berries. Study after study has confirmed their benefits. From nutrients to antioxidants, berries provide benefits that even other fruits don’t deliver.2 More and more consumers recognize these benefits. The number of U.S. households saying they’ve purchased blueberries, for instance, within the past month — 69% — has nearly doubled since 2008.3 In fact, Americans are also nearly twice as likely to buy blueberries now as nine years ago.4 Consumers prefer fresh produce over frozen when given a choice, and the industry has been working hard to fulfill that demand. 1 newhope360.com/new-products/consumers-ideas-healthy-foods-changing 2 mnn.com/food/healthy-eating/stories/superfoods-11-berries-to-improve-your-health 3 According to research sponsored by the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council 4 Hebert Research found in its May survey of 3,765 primary household shoppers 1003 Sigman Road // Conyers, GA 30013 // hillphoenixlc.com Page 2 of 5 Shoppers equate freshness with health and practically everyone believes blueberries in particular, are a healthy food. Blackberries, to cite another example, were purchased last year by one third of shoppers with kids, while only one quarter of consumers without kids said the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Papers in Botany Volume 22, Number 1 June 2017
    Harvard Papers in Botany Volume 22, Number 1 June 2017 A Publication of the Harvard University Herbaria Including The Journal of the Arnold Arboretum Arnold Arboretum Botanical Museum Farlow Herbarium Gray Herbarium Oakes Ames Orchid Herbarium ISSN: 1938-2944 Harvard Papers in Botany Initiated in 1989 Harvard Papers in Botany is a refereed journal that welcomes longer monographic and floristic accounts of plants and fungi, as well as papers concerning economic botany, systematic botany, molecular phylogenetics, the history of botany, and relevant and significant bibliographies, as well as book reviews. Harvard Papers in Botany is open to all who wish to contribute. Instructions for Authors http://huh.harvard.edu/pages/manuscript-preparation Manuscript Submission Manuscripts, including tables and figures, should be submitted via email to [email protected]. The text should be in a major word-processing program in either Microsoft Windows, Apple Macintosh, or a compatible format. Authors should include a submission checklist available at http://huh.harvard.edu/files/herbaria/files/submission-checklist.pdf Availability of Current and Back Issues Harvard Papers in Botany publishes two numbers per year, in June and December. The two numbers of volume 18, 2013 comprised the last issue distributed in printed form. Starting with volume 19, 2014, Harvard Papers in Botany became an electronic serial. It is available by subscription from volume 10, 2005 to the present via BioOne (http://www.bioone. org/). The content of the current issue is freely available at the Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries website (http://huh. harvard.edu/pdf-downloads). The content of back issues is also available from JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/) volume 1, 1989 through volume 12, 2007 with a five-year moving wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Growing Instructions for the Miracle Berry Plant Synsepalum Dulcificum “Miracle Fruit” (Sin-SEP-Ah-Lum)
    141 North Street Danielson, CT 06239 Toll Free: (888) 330-8038 FAX: (888) 774-9932 www.logees.com Easy Growing Instructions for the Miracle Berry Plant Synsepalum dulcificum “Miracle Fruit” (sin-SEP-ah-lum) This exciting plant from Tropical West Africa known as the Miracle Berry or Miracle Fruit (Synsepalum dulcificum) is a slow growing shrub that, once mature, produces fruit intermittently throughout the year. The miracle is in the berry. After you’ve eaten the small gumdrop sized berry, everything sour afterwards turns sweet. A mature plant will flower and fruit year-round. Once the plant reaches two feet in height it will produce fruit. More fruit tends to set in the summer time. When the fruit is ripe, the berries turn red. Ripe berries will hold onto the bush for several weeks. Hand pollination ensures that fruit will be produced. Pollinate by shaking the leave back and forth or by rubbing your hands through the branches when the plant is in flower. How to Care for Your Miracle Plant Light- Keep in a full-to-partially sunlit window. The more sun, the better. Water- Keep evenly moist, using a non-chlorinated water or, if the water is chlorinated, let it stand for 24 hours. Excessive dryness will kill or damage the plant. Do not allow to dry out. The greatest cause of losing the plant is that the roots dry out. Be especially attentive to watering, especially under high heat. We recently found a self-watering globe that will keep this plant evenly moist (new in our Fall 2007 catalogue).
    [Show full text]
  • 2,000 Trees a Day: Work and Life in the American Naval Stores Industry, 1877 to 1940 by Catherine Kim Gyllerstrom a Dissertatio
    2,000 Trees a Day: Work and Life in the American Naval Stores Industry, 1877 to 1940 by Catherine Kim Gyllerstrom A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 13, 2014 Keywords: Naval Stores, Turpentine, African American, Labor, Convict Lease, Debt Peonage Copyright 2014 by Catherine Kim Gyllerstrom Approved by Jennifer Brooks, Chair, Professor of History Ruth Crocker, Professor of History Angela Lakwete, Professor of History Tiffany Sippial, Professor of History Abstract This project explores the lives of nineteenth and early twentieth century naval stores workers in Alabama, Georgia, and Florida. After the Civil War, turpentine operators faced a high demand for their product, limited capital to embark on new operations, and an uncertain labor supply. Therefore, these men resorted to deceitful labor recruitment tactics to entice free workers to their camps. In addition, operators also supplemented their work force with convict labor. The preliminary focus of this dissertation is the experience—nature of work, work culture, and daily life—of turpentine employees. Previous historians, with the exception of Robert Outland, have dismissed turpentine harvesting as a makeshift operation on the periphery of civilization. In turn, this assessment has led to the misconception that turpentine workers were wild and violent frontiersmen, who rarely formed social bonds, idolized outlaws, and ascribed to a rough and tumble way of life. This work seeks to restore the reputation of naval stores laborers and contends that these men—both African American and white, both free and captive—shared a similar work culture to other industrial workers and established and supported families within the camps.
    [Show full text]