DOCSLIB.ORG

English Only, Both English and Swahili Or in Any Other Language

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
English Only, Both English and Swahili Or in Any Other Language 1 The United Republic of Tanzania National Sample Census of Agriculture 2019/20 National Report August, 2021 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... vii Definition of Key Terms .............................................................................................................. viii PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... xii 1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Information ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Census Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Census Scope and Coverage ............................................................................................. 2 1.5 Census Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 1.5.1 Sample Design .................................................................................................................. 4 1.5.2 Sample Size ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Census Organization ......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 DEMOGRAPHICS ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Agricultural Households ................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Types of Agricultural Activities of the Households ......................................................... 7 2.3 Agricultural Household Characteristics ............................................................................ 8 2.4 Number and Size of Agricultural Households ................................................................ 10 2.5 Literacy and Education of Agricultural Population ........................................................ 11 2.6 Education Status ............................................................................................................. 13 2.7 Main Household Activity ............................................................................................... 14 2.8 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 15 2.8.1 Area of Land Utilized ..................................................................................................... 16 2.8.2 Land Use Sufficiency ..................................................................................................... 16 2.8.3 Land Use Patterns ........................................................................................................... 18 3.0 CROPS RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Crop Production .............................................................................................................. 21 3.2.1 Cereals Crop Production ................................................................................................. 21 3.2.2 Roots and Tuber Crops Production ................................................................................. 36 3.2.2.1 Cassava ........................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.2.2 Sweet Potatoes ................................................................................................................ 42 3.1.4 Pulses .............................................................................................................................. 49 i 3.1.5 Oil Seeds and Nuts Crops ............................................................................................... 60 3.1.6 Fruits and Vegetables ..................................................................................................... 69 3.1.7 Cash Crops ...................................................................................................................... 88 3.3 Agro-Processing ............................................................................................................. 97 3.3.1 Households Involved in Agro-processing ...................................................................... 97 3.3.2 Quantity of Major Crop Products ................................................................................... 98 3.3.3 Major Outlets for Selling Agro-processed Products ....................................................... 99 3.3.3 Main Type of Packaging Material ................................................................................ 100 3.4 Irrigation ....................................................................................................................... 101 3.4.1 Area Planted under Irrigation ....................................................................................... 102 3.4.2 Main Crops Irrigated ..................................................................................................... 102 3.5 Input Use ....................................................................................................................... 107 3.5.1 Use of Improved Seeds ................................................................................................. 107 3.5.2 Fertilizer Use ................................................................................................................ 109 3.5.3 Use of Pesticides ........................................................................................................... 111 3.6 Access to Farm Inputs .................................................................................................. 113 3.6.1 Compost Manure .......................................................................................................... 114 3.6.2 Farmyard Manure ......................................................................................................... 115 3.6.3 Inorganic Fertilizer ....................................................................................................... 116 3.6.4 Improved seeds ............................................................................................................. 119 3.6.5 Insecticide/ Fungicides ................................................................................................. 121 3.7 Crop Extension Services ............................................................................................... 124 3.7.1 Access to Crop Extension Services .............................................................................. 125 3.7.2 Source of Extension Services ....................................................................................... 126 3.7.4 Extension Message Practices ........................................................................................ 127 3.8 Agriculture Mechanization ........................................................................................... 128 3.8.1 On Farm Investments .................................................................................................... 128 3.8.2 Use of Tractors and Draft Animals ............................................................................... 131 3.9: Crop Marketing ............................................................................................................. 132 3.9.1 Crop commercialization ................................................................................................ 132 3.9.2 Main Marketing Challenges ......................................................................................... 134 4.0 LIVESTOCK, FISH FARMING AND BEEKEEPING RESULTS ............................ 135 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 135 4.2 Livestock Population .................................................................................................... 135 ii 4.2.1 Cattle Population .......................................................................................................... 136 4.2.2 Goat Population ............................................................................................................ 140 4.2.3 Sheep Population .......................................................................................................... 144 4.2.4 Pig Population ............................................................................................................... 146 4.2.5 Chicken Population ...................................................................................................... 148 4.2.6 Other Poultry ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Tanzania in Figures
    2019 Tanzania in Figures The United Republic of Tanzania 2019 TANZANIA IN FIGURES National Bureau of Statistics Dodoma June 2020 H. E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli President of the United Republic of Tanzania “Statistics are very vital in the development of any country particularly when they are of good quality since they enable government to understand the needs of its people, set goals and formulate development programmes and monitor their implementation” H.E. Dr. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli the President of the United Republic of Tanzania at the foundation stone-laying ceremony for the new NBS offices in Dodoma December, 2017. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical information is very important as it helps a person to do things in an organizational way with greater precision unlike when one does not have. In my business, for example, statistics help me know where I can get raw materials, get to know the number of my customers and help me prepare products accordingly. Indeed, the numbers show the trend of my business which allows me to predict the future. My customers are both locals and foreigners who yearly visit the region. In June every year, I gather information from various institutions which receive foreign visitors here in Dodoma. With estimated number of visitors in hand, it gives me ample time to prepare products for my clients’ satisfaction. In terms of my daily life, Statistics help me in understanding my daily household needs hence make proper expenditures.” Mr. Kulwa James Zimba, Artist, Sixth street Dodoma.”. What is the importance of statistics in your daily life? “Statistical Data is useful for development at family as well as national level because without statistics one cannot plan and implement development plans properly.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD the Lindi Municipality Is One of the Major Coastal Towns Of
    FOREWORD I wish to recognize and commend all stakeholders who in one way or another contributed to the completion of the preparation of this master plan, starting with the Lindi Municipal Council who were The Lindi Municipality is one of the major coastal towns of Tanzania and a transit centre from Dar es the mentors of the idea of preparing it and supervised its process as a planning authority, the Lindi Salaam to Mtwara and Songea regions, and the Republic of Mozambique through the Umoja Bridge in District Council who shared the preparation and agreed to include the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala Mtwara Region. The town is well-endowed with rich agricultural and other natural resources hinterland, on the plan, the World Bank who funded it, the Consultants (JAGBENS Planners &JMZ Landfields including, inter alia, cashewnut, coconut and the normal cereal crops. Salt farming and fishing are also Ltd), the Lindi Regional Administrative Secretariat, technical teams, the public and private institutions prominent in, around and outside the town. Livestock keeping, particularly cattle, sheep, goats and and individuals. I remain hopeful that this Master Plan will be used in good course and as a tool to poultry is an upcoming production activity. The region has 28percent of its land covered by Selous guide the sustainable development of Lindi town and the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala inLindi Game reserve and many natural forest reserves. When talking of the future prosperity of Lindi, one District. cannot overlook a planned establishment within the municipality; a giant LNG Plant proposed to commence in 2020/2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mwanza Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report For
    LVWATSAN – Mwanza Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for Construction and Operation of a Faecal Sludge Treatment Plant in Lamadi Town, Busega District, Simiyu Region – Tanzania Prepared for: Mwanza Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (MWAUWASA) P.O. Box 317 Makongoro Road, Mwanza Prepared by: Mott MacDonald in association with UWP Consulting On behalf of ESIA Study Team: Wandert Benthem (Registered Environmental Expert), Mwanza Tel.: 0763011180; Email: [email protected] Submitted to: NEMC Lake Zone P.O. Box 11045 Maji Igogo, Mwanza Tel.: 0282502684 Email: [email protected] March 2017 LVWATSAN – Mwanza Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for Construction and Operation of a Faecal Sludge Treatment Plant in Lamadi Town, Busega District, Simiyu Region – Tanzania March 2017 Mwanza Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (MWAUWASA) OPS/ASD/Technical Assistance Unit (TAU), 100 boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-2950 Luxembourg The technical assistance operation is financed by the European Union under the Cotonou Agreement, through the European Development Fund (EDF). The EDF is the main instrument funded by the EU Member States for providing Community aid for development cooperation in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the Overseas Countries and Territories. The authors take full responsibility for the contents of this report. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the view of the European Union or the European Investment Bank. Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 W www.mottmac.com Green corner – Save a tree today! Mott MacDonald is committed to integrating sustainability into our operational practices and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ’s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mtwara-Lindi Water Master Plan
    REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME 2 STUDIES April 1986 A FINNWATER HELSINKI, THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME 2 STUDIES LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE CENTRE FOR COMMUNITY WAT £R SUPPLY •.,.0 ^Ah ÏTATION (irtC) ;''.O. •:_!:;;< )3190, 2503 AD The : ivgue I..;!. (Q70) 814311 ext 141/142 H April 1986 A FINNWATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS HELSINKI, FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1986 - 2001 VOLUME 2 STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATIONS 4 2.1 General 4 2.2 Village Survey 4 2.3 Piped Water Supply Schemes Inspection 5 2.4 Water Supply Situation 1984 6 2.41 General Water Supply Situation 6 2.42 Piped Water Supply Schemes 10 3 SURFACE WATER RESOURCES REVIEW 14 3.1 General 14 3.2 Meteorology 14 3.3 Precipitation 15 3.4 Hydrometry 15 3.41 General 15 3.42 Network 19 3.43 Flow Records 23 3.5 Surface Water Resources 24 4 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES REVIEW 26 4.1 General Hydrogeological Conditions 26 4.2 Hydrogeological Data 1976 - 1984 27 4.21 General 27 4.22 Shallow Groundwater 27 4.23 Deep Groundwater 31 4.3 Basement Study 32 4.4 Groundwater Potential 34 4.41 General 34 4.42 Masasi District 34 4.43 Mtwara District 36 4.44 Newala District 36 4.45 Kilwa District 37 4.46 Lindi District 37 4.47 Liwale District 38 4.48 Nachingwea District 38 LIST OF FIGURES No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Population and Housing Census
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio- Economic Profile 2014 Key Findings 2012 Population and Housing Census Overview The United Republic of Tanzania carried out a Population and Housing Census (PHC) on 26th August, 2012. The 2012 PHC was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The fundamental objective of the 2012 PHC was to provide information on the size, distribution, composition and other socio-economic characteristics of the population, as well as information on housing conditions. The 2012 PHC also used a Community Questionnaire to collect information on the availability of socio-economic services such as schools and hospitals. The information provided is useful for monitoring and evaluating the country’s development programmes. The 2012 Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile provide short descriptive analyses and related tables on main thematic areas covered in the 2012 PHC. Topics covered in the report include population size and growth, age and sex distributions; household composition, marital status, disability, citizenship, birth registration and diaspora. Other topics are fertility and mortality, survival of parents, literacy and education, economic activities, housing conditions, ownership of assets, household amenities, agriculture and livestock; and social security funds. This booklet gives a summary of the 2012 Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profiles of Tanzania (Volume IIIA), Tanzania Mainland (Volume IIIB), Tanzania Zanzibar (Volume IIIC) and a Detailed Statistical Tables for National Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile (Volume IIID). In many cases, characteristics have been disaggregated by rural and urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Region Investment Profile
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COAST REGION INVESTMENT PROFILE JANUARY, 2015 a coast book.indd 1 10/16/14 5:23 AM b coast book.indd 2 10/16/14 5:23 AM UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COAST REGION INVESTMENT PROFILE JANUARY, 2015 i coast book.indd 3 10/16/14 5:23 AM ii coast book.indd 4 10/16/14 5:23 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................... iii Abbreviations ....................................................................................iv COAST REGION: THE BEST DESTINATION FOR INVESTMENT.....vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................... ix THE REGIONAL PROFILE ............................................................1 1.0. REGIONAL DESCRIPTION .....................................................1 1.1 Geographical Location and Surface area .............................1 1.2 Administrative units and Organization Structure ..............2 1.3 Population and Demographic Pattern ................................ 2 1.4 Climate, Soil and Topography.............................................. 2 2.0 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES .........................................................5 2.1 FORMAL SECTOR ...................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Agriculture.......................................................................... 5 2.1. 2 Industries and Trade .........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Work Plan FY 2019 Project Year 8
    Tanzania Work Plan FY 2019 Project Year 8 October 2018–September 2019 ENVISION is a global project led by RTI International in partnership with CBM International, The Carter Center, Fred Hollows Foundation, Helen Keller International, IMA World Health, Light for the World, Sightsavers, and World Vision. ENVISION is funded by the US Agency for International Development under cooperative agreement No. AID-OAA-A-11-00048. The period of performance for ENVISION is September 30, 2011, through September 30, 2019. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ENVISION Project Overview The US Agency for International Development (USAID)’s ENVISION project (2011–2019) is designed to support the vision of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member states by targeting the control and elimination of seven neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis (OV), schistosomiasis (SCH), three soil-transmitted helminths (STH; roundworm, whipworm, and hookworm), and trachoma. ENVISION’s goal is to strengthen NTD programming at global and country levels and support ministries of health (MOHs) to achieve their NTD control and elimination goals. At the global level, ENVISION—in close coordination and collaboration with WHO, USAID, and other stakeholders—contributes to several technical areas in support of global NTD control and elimination goals, including the following: • Drug and diagnostics procurement, where global donation programs are unavailable • Capacity strengthening • Management and implementation of ENVISION’s Technical Assistance Facility (TAF) • Disease mapping • NTD policy and technical guideline development • NTD monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Expansion in Zanzibar City, Tanzania
    1 Urban expansion in Zanzibar City, Tanzania: Analyzing quantity, spatial patterns and effects of 2 alternative planning approaches 3 4 MO Kukkonen, MJ Muhammad, N Käyhkö, M Luoto 5 6 Land Use Policy, 2018 - Elsevier 7 8 Abstract 9 Rapid urbanization and urban area expansion of sub-Saharan Africa are megatrends of the 21st century. 10 Addressing environmental and social problems related to these megatrends requires faster and more efficient 11 urban planning that is based on measured information of the expansion patterns. Urban growth prediction 12 models (UGPMs) provide tools for generating such information by predicting future urban expansion patterns 13 and allowing testing of alternative planning scenarios. We created an UGPM for Zanzibar City in Tanzania by 14 measuring urban expansion in 2004–2009 and 2009–2013, linking the expansion to explanatory variables with 15 a generalized additive model, measuring the accuracy of the created model, and projecting urban growth until 16 2030 with the business-as-usual and various alternative planning scenarios. Based on the results, the urban 17 area of Zanzibar City expanded by 40% from 2004 to 2013. Spatial patterns of expansion were largely driven 18 by the already existing building pattern and land-use constraints. The created model predicted future urban 19 expansion moderately well and had an area under the curve value of 0.855 and a true skill statistic result of 20 0.568. Based on the business-as-usual scenario, the city will expand 89% from 2013 until 2030 and will 21 continue to sprawl to new regions at the outskirts of the current built-up area.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundian Refugees in Western Tanzania, It Can Be Expected That Such Activities Would Take Place
    BURUNDIAN REFUGEES IN TANZANIA: The Key Factor to the Burundi Peace Process ICG Central Africa Report N° 12 30 November 1999 PROLOGUE The following report was originally issued by the International Crisis Group (ICG) as an internal paper and distributed on a restricted basis in February 1999. It incorporates the results of field research conducted by an ICG analyst in and around the refugee camps of western Tanzania during the last three months of 1998. While the situation in Central Africa has evolved since the report was first issued, we believe that the main thrust of the analysis presented remains as valid today as ever. Indeed, recent events, including the killing of UN workers in Burundi and the deteriorating security situation there, only underscore the need for greater attention to be devoted to addressing the region’s unsolved refugee problem. With this in mind, we have decided to reissue the report and give it a wider circulation, in the hope that the information and arguments that follow will help raise awareness of this important problem and stimulate debate on the best way forward. International Crisis Group Nairobi 30 November 1999 Table of Contents PROLOGUE .......................................................................................................................................... I I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 II. REFUGEE FLOWS INTO TANZANIA.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Referral Transit Time Between Sending and First-Line Receiving Health Facilities: a Geographical Analysis in Tanzania
    Research BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001568 on 17 August 2019. Downloaded from Referral transit time between sending and first-line receiving health facilities: a geographical analysis in Tanzania Michelle M Schmitz, 1 Florina Serbanescu,1 George E Arnott,1 Michelle Dynes,1 Paul Chaote,2 Abdulaziz Ally Msuya,3 Yi No Chen1 To cite: Schmitz MM, ABSTRACT Summary box Serbanescu F, Arnott GE, Background Timely, high-quality obstetric services et al. Referral transit time are vital to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. We What is already known? between sending and first- spatially modelled referral pathways between sending line receiving health facilities: Strengthening obstetric inter-facility referral sys- and receiving health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, ► a geographical analysis in tems in developing countries, including reducing de- identifying communication and transportation delays to Tanzania. BMJ Global Health lays due to inadequate transportation and unreliable timely care and inefficient links within the referral system. 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/ communication, increases access to timely, appro- Methods We linked sending and receiving facilities to bmjgh-2019-001568 priate obstetric and neonatal care. form facility pairs, based on information from a 2016 Handling editor Seye Abimbola Health Facility Assessment. We used an AccessMod cost- What are the new findings? friction surface model, incorporating road classifications ► About 57.8% of facility pairs in Kigoma did not refer Additional material is ► and speed limits, to estimate direct travel time between to facilities providing higher levels of care. published online only. To facilities in each pair. We adjusted for transportation view please visit the journal ► When accounting for communication and transpor- online (http:// dx.
    [Show full text]