20130722-UK Projects-U
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Whole Day Download the Hansard
Thursday Volume 655 28 February 2019 No. 261 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 28 February 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 497 28 FEBRUARY 2019 498 Stephen Barclay: As the shadow spokesman, the right House of Commons hon. and learned Member for Holborn and St Pancras (Keir Starmer), said yesterday,there have been discussions between the respective Front Benches. I agree with him Thursday 28 February 2019 that it is right that we do not go into the details of those discussions on the Floor of the House, but there have The House met at half-past Nine o’clock been discussions and I think that that is welcome. Both the Chair of the Select Committee, the right hon. Member for Leeds Central (Hilary Benn) and other distinguished PRAYERS Members, such as the right hon. Member for Birkenhead (Frank Field), noted in the debate yesterday that there had been progress. It is important that we continue to [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] have those discussions, but that those of us on the Government Benches stand by our manifesto commitments in respect of not being part of a EU customs union. BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS 21. [909508] Luke Pollard (Plymouth, Sutton and NEW WRIT Devonport) (Lab/Co-op): I have heard from people Ordered, from Plymouth living in the rest of the EU who are sick I beg to move that Mr Speaker do issue his Warrant to the to the stomach with worry about what will happen to Clerk of the Crown to make out a New Writ for the electing of a them in the event of a no deal. -
Covid-19 - Royal Navy Staff Contact List Surname Forename L&D Hub Role Contact No
COVID-19 - ROYAL NAVY STAFF CONTACT LIST SURNAME FORENAME L&D HUB ROLE CONTACT NO. CONTACT EMAIL ARNOLD-BHATTI KHALIDA HMNB PORTSMOUTH eLA Work mob: 07513 483808 ASTON JIM 43 CDO RM CLYDE LT RN / OIC/ERO [email protected] Mil: 93255 6911, ATKINSON GARTH HMNB CLYDE LT CDR, RN [email protected] Civ: 01436 674321 Ext 6911 BAKER IAN RNAS Yeovilton Coord Contact Via TSM Contact via Pam Fisher BALLS SARA LDO APPS LT CDR, RN [email protected] BANKS TERRIE RNAS Yeovilton NRIO 07500 976770 Contact via Pam Fisher BEADNELL ROBERT HMNB PORTSMOUTH LT CDR, RN / OIC 07527 927699 BENNETT ZONA RNAS Yeovilton Coord Contact via Pam Fisher Contact via Pam Fisher BRADSHAW NICK 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE TUTOR 07376 335930 BRICE KAREN CTCRM IT Manager 07795 434832 Mil: 93781 2147 BRICKSTOCK STEPHEN RNAS CULDROSE OIC / ERO Civ: 01326 552147 [email protected] Mob: 07411 563346 BUTLER RACHEL HMNB DEVONPORT [email protected] CARPENTER NEIL 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE Co-ord / ELA 01752 217498 CHEAL ANDY LDO HQ CDR, RN 07976 455653 [email protected] CLARKE ELAINE RNAS CULDROSE Tutor 07962 118941 Contact via primary POC - OiC Steve Brickstock CLARKE SOPHIE RNAS CULDROSE EDO contact via OiC Contact via primary POC - OiC Steve Brickstock COLEMAN LAURA HMNB CLYDE [email protected] CRAWFORD COLJN NCHQ / HMS COLLINGWOOD RN ELC Scheme Manager [email protected] Mil: 9375 41509 DENWOOD MARTIN HMS RALEIGH OIC/ERO [email protected] Civ: 01752 811509 DRINKALL KATHRYN RNAS Yeovilton LT CDR, RN ASSIGNED TO COVID-19 [email protected] EASTERBROOK LEIGH 30 CDO RM, STONEHOUSE Co-ord/Reset/GCSEs 07770 618001 EWEN HAYLEY HMNB PORTSMOUTH Nelson Co-ord 02392 526420 1 09/04/20 SURNAME FORENAME L&D HUB ROLE CONTACT NO. -
The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935. -
Social History
© University of London – Text by Dr Rosalind Johnson (edited by Mary Siraut) 1 SOCIAL HISTORY SOCIAL CHARACTER Although the medieval parish was dominated by the manor and the lord of the manor retained the advowson until the late 17th century, there is no evidence for a resident lord of the manor until the 1840s when Charles Noel Welman built Norton Manor.1 In 1700 the tenant at Knowle Hill had been able to fell a considerable amount of timber and establish a stone quarry before the lord was able to take any action.2 In 1327 Richard Stapeldon, lord of the manor, was assessed at 10s., substantially the largest assessment in the parish and only eight other taxpayers were assessed at 1s. or more, half of them in Langford.3 Fifteen persons with land or goods in Norton were assessed for the 1581 subsidy, though not all may have been resident. 4 In 1742 the parish was as assessed at 3s. 8d. as its proportion towards the county rate, an average figure for the parishes in the hundred of Taunton and Taunton Deane.5 By 1782 William Hawker, lord of the manor, was the chief landowner in the village, but there were several smaller estates and a number of small freeholders with a single dwelling or plot of land.6 Not until c.1842, There may have been tensions in the parish between more prosperous householders and the labouring classes. In 1849 concerns were expressed about the ‘excess and immorality’ in the village occasioned by labourers frequenting beer houses.7 In 1855 the vestry meeting agreed to offer a reward for information leading to a conviction after a spate of burglaries in the parish.8 1 See landownership. -
20190409-Old Cranwellians-Apr19 V1.4-O with Images
RAF News Brief 2019/2 Organisation Operational Service Medal In 2017, Her Majesty The Queen agreed the introduction of a new Operational Service Medal (OSM) for Op SHADER. In February 2019, Her Majesty The Queen graciously approved an extension of the medal without clasp for personnel assessed as making a significant and direct operational contribution, but outside the joint operational area for Op SHADER. Under new rules, personnel from all three services serving from outside the traditional area of operations, such as operators of RAF Reaper Remotely Piloted Air System (RPAS) aircraft, can now receive the Op SHADER medal without clasp. The award of the medal reflects the changing nature of modern conflict and recognises the vital contribution that personnel working from outside the operational area of Iraq and Syria have made to the campaign. This will be the first time that RPAS crews have received formal medallic recognition. Ground crew serving at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, where UK airstrikes over Iraq and Syria are launched from are also eligible, as well as Army and Navy personnel providing logistic and communications support. Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Hillier, said: “I am delighted to see this wider recognition of the RAF’s vital contribution to Op SHADER. Under the previous criteria, only about 14% of RAF personnel who had supported Op SHADER were entitled to receive the OSM. Under the new criteria, that proportion rises to over two-thirds. I extend my personal thanks and congratulations to all those who will now receive the OSM for their outstanding Op SHADER contribution.” Update on Defence Estate Optimisation Programme The MOD published an update to the Defence Estate Optimisation Programme in March 2019, setting new information for 33 military sites across the UK. -
The Glory Of
MAKING A DIFFERENCE 2015 For the Glory of God and the Good of the Service “The glory of God” said St Irenaeus, “is a Contact Us person fully alive; and the life of a person is Aggie Weston’s Editor Dame Agnes Weston’s Castaway House Theresa Pratt the vision of God”. Royal Sailors’ Rests 311 Twyford Avenue I wonder if this quote was in Agnes Weston’s mind when and express the impact of (Generally known as Aggie’s) Portsmouth PO2 8RN she coined our motto: “For the Glory of God and the Good our work because by doing T 023 9265 0505 Cover Photo of the Service”. Certainly her goal – and ours as we seek to so we can further improve Registered Charity No 238748 E [email protected] Agnes Weston and Sophia Wintz continue her work – was to see the Royal Navy and Royal our practice. Our accounts, Scottish Charity No SCO39718 www.aggies.org.uk Marines, and their families, enjoying “life in all its fullness”, which can be read online to quote Jesus’ expression of the impact his life and death at the Charity Commission website, tell the numbers, but makes possible. important as the numbers are they tell only a part of it. It is PATRONS said that a picture tells a thousand words; and even a few It is therefore not only with great pleasure but also with Her Majesty the Queen words can suffice to tell a great story; so over the following genuine pride in all of our dedicated and hard working Ministry of Defence pages we tell, in both image and word, the narrative of our staff that I present this brief showcase demonstrating just response to the needs of the Royal Navy and Royal Marines, some of the impact of the charity’s work. -
Statement of Requirements
STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS INVITATION TO TENDER MedGS/0004 SUPPLY OF INTRAOSSEOUS INFUSION EZ-IO SYSTEM & ASSOCIATED PARTS CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW 2. REQUIREMENT 3. QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE 5. SPECIFICATIONS 6. ORDERING 7. PACKAGING 8. LABELLING 9. REJECTION and RECTIFICATION 10. DELIVERY 11. SURGE 12. MANAGEMENT 13. PERFORMANCE MONITORING 14. MEETINGS 15. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 16. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT/PROCUREMENT 17. END OF CONTRACT ACTIVITIES Annex: A – DEMANDING AUTHORITIES AND DELIVERY POINTS B – KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS C – PROCEDURE FOR P2P DEMAND ORDERS D - PROCEDURE FOR NON-P2P DEMAND ORDERS 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This Statement of Requirements (SToR) sets out the Medical and General Supplies Team (MedGS) requirements for the supply of Intraosseous Infusion EZ-IO System and Associated Products. 2. REQUIREMENT 2.1 The Contractor shall supply the Articles detailed in the Schedule of Requirements (SoR), as they are ordered by the Demanding Authority, packaged to the appropriate level and to contracted lead times. 3. QUALITY MANAGEMENT 3.1 The Contractor shall operate a Quality Management System certified to ISO 9001-2008 and the following requirements shall apply to work under the Contract: AQAP 2120 Edition 3 – NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Production. Defence Standard 05-61 Part 1 – Quality Assurance Procedural Requirements – Concessions. DEFCON 602b - Quality Assurance – Without Deliverable Quality Plan. AQAP 2009 Edition 2 – NATO Guidance on the use of the AQAP 2000 Series. AQAP 2070 Edition 2 – The NATO Mutual Government Quality Assurance Process. 3.2 The Authority’s Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) shall be as shown at Box 7 of the Appendix to the Contract (DEFFORM 111). -
Ndascagcagcag))))
North Devon and SomerSomersetset Coastal AAAdvisoryAdvisory Group ((NDASNDASNDASCAGCAGCAG)))) Shoreline Management Plan Review ((SMP2SMP2SMP2)))) Hartland Point to Anchor Head Appendix B – Stakeholder Engagement Hartland Point to AnchoAnchorr Head SMP2 Appendix B ––– Stakeholder Engagement The Supporting Appendices These appendices and the accompanying documents provide all of the information required to support the Shoreline Management Plan. This is to ensure that there is clarity in the decision-making process and that the rationale behind the policies being promoted is both transparent and auditable. The appendices are: A: SMP Development This reports the history of development of the SMP, describing more fully the plan and policy decision-making process. B: Stakeholder Engagement All communications from the stakeholder process are provided here, together with information arising from the consultation process. C: Baseline Process Understanding Includes baseline process report, defence assessment, NAI and WPM assessments and summarises data used in assessments. D: SEA Environmental Baseline This report identifies and evaluates the environmental features Report (Theme Review) (human, natural, historical and landscape). E: Issues & Objectives Evaluation Provides information on the issues and objectives identified as part of the Plan development, including appraisal of their importance. F: Initial Policy Appraisal & Scenario Presents the consideration of generic policy options for each Development frontage, identifying possible acceptable policies, and their combination into ‘scenarios’ for testing. Also presents the appraisal of impacts upon shoreline evolution and the appraisal of objective achievement. G: Preferred Policy Scenario Testing Presents the policy assessment and appraisal of objective achievement towards definition of the Preferred Plan (as presented in the Shoreline Management Plan document). H: Economic Appraisal and Presents the economic analysis undertaken in support of the Sensitivity Testing Preferred Plan. -
DIO Delivers Critical Rehabilitation Facilities to the Royal Marines
DIO Delivers Critical Rehabilitation Facilities to the Royal Marines The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) recently completed a new Physical and Remedial Training Centre for 40 Commando Royal Marines (40 Cdo RM ) at Norton Manor Camp in Somerset. Sarawak Gym, named in recognition of 40 Commando’s involvement in the Indonesia-Malaysia Confrontation from 1962 to 1966, was opened at an official ceremony by Lieutenant Colonel Matt Jackson Royal Marines, Commanding Officer 40 Commando Royal Marines. The new building delivered by DIO, working with regional industry partner Debut Services (South West) Limited, will provide essential modern sports facilities to support the physical well being of unit personnel. Also housed within the new building is a dedicated remedial suite to support the rehabilitation of injured Marines returning from overseas operations as well as those injured through the day to day rigours of training in the UK. These amenities replace the old facilities housed in a drill shed dating from the 1940s, built during the Second Word War. Positioned adjacent to the Medical and Dental Centre, also previously delivered by DIO and Debut in 2009, the new facilities will greatly improve efficiency and support provided to service personnel, allowing a speedy recovery back to operational fitness. This will in turn help improve the operational capability of 40 Cdo RM. Lieutenant Colonel Jackson, Commanding Officer 40 Cdo RM said: “This is a superb facility. 40 Commando, DIO and Debut have worked as a dedicated team to design and deliver a gymnasium from which all personnel serving at the Unit will benefit for many years to come. -
Royal Marines Reserve and the Career Opportunities the Royal Navy You’Re Probably Available to You
YOUR ROLE THE PEOPLE YOU’LL MEET THE PLACES YOU’LL GO RESERVE CAREERSMARINES R OYAL WELCOME For most people, the demands of one job are enough. However, some of you need more of a challenge, and they don’t come much bigger than joining the Royal Marines Reserve. The Royal Marines Reserve is a part-time force of civilian volunteers, who give the Royal Marines extra manpower in times of peace and humanitarian crisis or war. You’ll be trained to the same standards as the regular Royal Marines, have to pass the same commando tests and, of course, wear the same coveted green beret. The obvious difference is that, as a Reservist, you combine service as a fully-trained Commando with your civilian career. It’s a unique way of life that attracts people from all backgrounds. But, the nature of commando training and service means we can’t just take anybody who fancies a challenge. We, and you, have to be absolutely sure it’s the right thing for you and that you’re physically and mentally up to the job. It’s a long, tough road to the green beret. But if you like the idea of travel, sport, adventure and, most importantly, the satisfaction of completing the world’s toughest military training and getting paid for it, this is where it begins. We wish you every success and look forward to welcoming you to the Royal Marines Reserve. Visit royalmarines.mod.uk/rmr or call 08456 00 14 14 CONTENTS Welcome 2 Who we are and what we do 4 What it means to be a Reservist 8 Joining, training and 10 specialisations General Duties Marines and Officers How to join Commando training Commando specialisations Commando Officer specialisations Royal Marines Reserve life 24 Your commitment What we can offer you Sports and recreation And finally.. -
Northover's Vet Team
Northover's VT Present on behalf of the RNRMCA The RNRMCA TT Champs 2020 Event Sponsored by: Sunday 20th September - U22 Norton Manor Results:- Event HQ by kind Permission of 40 Cdo 40 Commando Norton Manor Camp Norton Fitzwarren Taunton (Promoted for and on behalf of Cycling Time Trials under their rules and Regulations) Event Secretary Tom Cox 54 Graham Way Cotford St Luke Taunton Somerset TA4 1JG IN THE INTEREST OF YOUR OWN SAFETY, Cycling Time Trials and the event Promoters strongly advise you to wear a HARD SHELL HELMET that meets an internationally accepted safety standard. 1 Results: - Overall 1St Dean Robson – Velo Club Jersey 37:29 £30.00 2nd Robert Willcocks – RAF CC 38:30 £20.00 3rd Tom Scorer – RNRMCA £10.00 1st Lady – Rebecca Commins Newport Phoenix £30.00 Men V40+ 1st Tony Chapman – Frome & District Whlrs £20.00 2nd Tim Southcombe – Somerset RC £15.00 3rd Roy Carless – Swindon RC £10.00 Road Bike 1st Man Road Bike – Aled Jones RNRMCA £10.00 1st Lady Road Bike Katherine Pratt RNRMCA £10.00 Congratulations:- May I congratulate all the prize winners and kindly ask that they contact me direct via email or PM with their bank details and I will arrange a transfer or if preferred a cheque. Also thank you to all the riders who advised me they could not make it especially those awaiting test results and trust the news there is not positive if you accept my meaning. Likewise I trust the rest enjoyed what is a bit of an old fashioned course and hope you will return for our event on this course in June 2021. -
Service Inquiry Into the Fatal Diving Incident at the National Diving and Activity Centre, Newport on 26 March 2018
Service Inquiry SERVICE INQUIRY INTO THE FATAL DIVING INCIDENT AT THE NATIONAL DIVING AND ACTIVITY CENTRE, NEWPORT ON 26 MARCH 2018. NSC/SI/01/18 NAVY COMMAND OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE PART 1.1 – COVERING NOTE. NSC/SI/01/18 20 Feb 19 FLEET COMMANDER SERVICE INQUIRY INVESTIGATION INTO THE FATAL DIVING INCIDENT AT THE NATIONAL DIVING AND ACTIVITY CENTRE, NEWPORT ON 26 MARCH 2018. 1. The Service Inquiry Panel assembled at Navy Safety Centre, HMS EXCELLENT on 26 Apr 18 for the purpose of investigating the death of 30122659 LCpl Partridge on 26 Mar 18 and to make recommendations in order to prevent recurrence. The Panel has concluded its inquiries and submits the finalised report for the Convening Authority’s consideration. 2. The following inquiry papers are enclosed: Part 1 REPORT Part 2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Part 1.1 Covering Note and Glossary Part 2.1 Diary of Events Part 1.2 Convening Order and TORs Part 2.2 List of Witnesses Part 1.3 Narrative of Events Part 2.3 Witness Statements Part 1.4 Findings Part 2.4 List of Attendees Part 1.5 Recommendations Part 2.5 List of Exhibits Part 1.6 Convening Authority Comments Part 2.6 Exhibits Part 2.7 List of Annexes Part 2.8 Annexes President Lt Col Army President Diving SI Members Lt Cdr RN Warrant Officer Class 1 Technical Member Diving SME Member 1.1 - 1 NSC/SI/01/18 OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE © Crown Copyright OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE Part 1.1 – Glossary 1. Those technical elements listed below without an explanation here are explained in full when they are first used.