DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of High-Technology Industries in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 12-3-1993 Development of High-technology Industries in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area: An Analysis of Regional and Intraregional Factors Affecting High- tech Firm Locations Ulf Eichner Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geography Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Eichner, Ulf, "Development of High-technology Industries in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area: An Analysis of Regional and Intraregional Factors Affecting High-tech Firm Locations" (1993). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4901. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6777 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Ulf Eichner for the Master of Arts in Geography were presented December 3, 1993, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: ---u:r T Bul~an Richard Lycan "· Craig E. Wollner, Representative of the Office of Graduate Studies DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: Department of /Gt:uy.r.ctpuy ************************************************************ ACCEPTED FOR PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE LIBRARY on /Z&L$4'~±K /'795 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Ulf Eichner for the Master of Arts in Geography presented December 3, 1993. Title: Development of High-Technology Industries in the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area: An Analysis of Regional and Intraregional Factors Affecting High­ Tech Firm Locations. This thesis aims to investigate local conditions of high-tech industry development in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA. To do so, the research proceeds in four major stages. First, it is analyzed how historical factors contributed to the rise of high-tech industries in the CMSA. The second part consists of mapping the distribution pattern of high­ tech establishments. The U.S. Bureau of Census' County Business Patterns statistics are used to calculate the number of high-tech establishments and employees by branch (SIC code) and county; two high-tech directories help to identify the exact firm locations. Thirdly, an explanatory set of locational factors is established, based on interviews with various regional and local economic development agencies and on a review of relevant economic theories. Finally, the impact of state and local policies on high-tech firm locational decisions is elaborated. 2 The development of high-tech industries in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA can be divided up into three phases. While the first phase (1945 to 1974) is mainly distinguished by local entrepreneurship, the second phase (1975 to 1984) is characterized by an in-migration of high-tech firms headquartered outside the Pacific Northwest. Beginning in 1985 (phase III), Japanese high-tech investment became the most significant growth factor. High-tech establishments are not evenly distributed over the metropolitan area, but their locations are rather marked by distinctive clusters. Recent high-tech industry development is largely a suburban phenomenon, avoiding inner-city areas and the CMSA's eastside with its traditional metalworking industry base. Most Californian and foreign-owned high-tech companies have established only standardized branch production and assembly facilities in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA to take advantage of low business costs. Although the high quality of life enables high-tech firms to recruit easily scientific, engineering, and technical personnel to the CMSA, the majority of companies has not yet set up R&D centers. Main reason is the missing link to a prominent research university nearby. Therefore, state and local policies have shifted their focus from attracting foreign branch plants to improving the quality of educational institutions. DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES IN THE PORTLAND/ VANCOUVER METROPOLITAN AREA: AN ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL AND INTRAREGIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING HIGH-TECH FIRM LOCATIONS by ULF EICHNER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in GEOGRAPHY Portland State University 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I am indebted to my adviser, Dr. Thomas Harvey, for reviewing earlier drafts of this thesis and thereby enabling me to sharpen up the direction of my research. I also wish to thank Mrs. Carolyn Perry for helping me with the technical aspects of the thesis preparation. Finally, I am especially grateful to my parents for their financial support, without it the completion of this research project would have been impossible. Ulf Eichner TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . • iii LIST OF TABLES . vi LIST OF FIGURES . • . • . viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH PROBLEM . 1 What Does High-Technology Mean? . 4 The Theoretical Base: Regional Growth Theories, Industrial Location Theory, and Marxist Economic Theories and How They Apply to High-Tech Industry Development . 9 How the Portland/Vancouver CMSA Compares to Other High-Tech Industry Locations in the U.S. 26 Methodology . 32 II DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES IN THE PORTLAND/VANCOUVER CMSA . 40 How the Portland/Vancouver CMSA High- Tech Industry Complex Evolved: The Main Contributing Factors • . 40 Distribution of High-Tech Establishments in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA • . 57 III THE WHY OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRY LOCATIONS IN THE PORTLAND/VANCOUVER CMSA: REGIONAL AND INTRAREGIONAL FACTORS . • • . • . • . 73 Regional Locational Factors . 73 Intraregional Locational Factors . 89 v IV HOW STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES IN THE PORTLAND/VANCOUVER CMSA . 95 v SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . • . 109 REFERENCES . 114 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I Definitions of High-Technology Industry ... 6 II Locational Determinants for High-Technology Vs. Non-High-Technology Plants ..... 16 III Locational Determinants for High-Technology Plants Between and Within Regions . 16 IV Comparison of 1975 Employment and 1975-1988 Employment Growth in Manufacturing, Services, and High-Tech in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA {by County) . 29 V A Comparison of High-Tech Complexes in the U.S •••.•••••••••••..•• 31 VI Definition of High-Technology Industry Based on the Revised 1987 SIC Manual . 36 VII Quanix Product Subcategories and Assigned SIC Codes of the Research Definition 37 VIII High-Tech Employment in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA in 1988 by County . 58 IX High-Tech Employment and Number of High-Tech Establishments in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA in 1988 {by SIC Code) • . • . 59 vii X High-Tech Employment and Number of High-Tech Establishments in 1988 by County and SIC Code . • . 64 XI 1990 Average Weekly Wages in the Manufacturing Sector in High-Tech Core States and Oregon . 77 XII Average SAT Scores: The States Ranked 1989 . 88 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. The Five Major and Five Minor High-Tech Core States and Their Fringes 27 2. High-Tech Manufacturing and Service Establishments Founded 1974 and Prior in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA Excluding Yamhill County (1991) . 42 3. Home-Grown Tektronix and Electro Scientific Industries plus California Arrival Intel as the Most Important Sources of Spin-Offs in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 44 4. High-Tech Manufacturing and Service Establishments Founded 1975-1984 in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA Excluding Yamhill County (1991) ......... 47 5. High-Tech Manufacturing and Service Establishments Founded 1985 and Later in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA Excluding Yamhill County (1991) . 54 ix 6. Locations of High-Tech Manufacturing Establishments in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA Excluding Yamhill County, 1991 . • • . • . • . 61 7. Distribution of High-Tech Employment (Manufacturing, Supporting Products and Services, Software) in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA by Municipality, 1991 . 63 8. Distribution of High-Tech Establishments (Manufacturing, Supporting Products and Services, Software) in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA by Municipality, 1991 • 66 9. Locations of Software Developing Establishments in the Portland/ Vancouver CMSA, 1991 . 68 10. Number of High-Tech Establishments in Manufacturing and Services in 1988 by County . 70 11. Cost of Living Index for Selected Large Metropolitan Areas in the Western U.S. in 1990 . • . • . 82 12. Comparison of Median Home Sales Prices for Major Metropolitan Areas in the Western u . s . , 19 8 9 and 19 9 0 . • . • . • . 8 3 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH PROBLEM The Portland/Vancouver metropolitan area (CMSA; Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area) has become a major center for high-technology industries, often labeled with fairly grandiose names like "Oregon Silicon Forest" or "Silicon Valley North", indicating the degree to which Silicon Valley is accepted as a model for economic development. What contributed to the rise of high-tech industries in the Portland/Vancouver CMSA and how significant is the region's high-tech industry in terms of its scale, diversity, and dynamics? This study investigates local conditions of high-tech development - an approach that contrasts with much of the previous work in industrial geography. Rather than focusing on the global environment and corporate strategy of multilocation firms, regional and intraregional factors that influence patterns of
Recommended publications
  • Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing

    Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing

    Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing Mary C. Kulas New Computing Structures Strategic Relations Group December 1987 For Internal Use Only Copyright @ 1987 by Digital Equipment Corporation. Printed in U.S.A. The information contained herein is confidential and proprietary. It is the property of Digital Equipment Corporation and shall not be reproduced or' copied in whole or in part without written permission. This is an unpublished work protected under the Federal copyright laws. The following are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, MA 01754. DECpage LN03 This report was produced by Educational Services with DECpage and the LN03 laser printer. Contents Acknowledgments. 1 Abstract. .. 3 Executive Summary. .. 5 I. Analysis . .. 7 A. The Players . .. 9 1. Number and Status . .. 9 2. Funding. .. 10 3. Strategic Alliances. .. 11 4. Sales. .. 13 a. Revenue/Units Installed . .. 13 h. European Sales. .. 14 B. The Product. .. 15 1. CPUs. .. 15 2. Chip . .. 15 3. Bus. .. 15 4. Vector Processing . .. 16 5. Operating System . .. 16 6. Languages. .. 17 7. Third-Party Applications . .. 18 8. Pricing. .. 18 C. ~BM and Other Major Computer Companies. .. 19 D. Why Success? Why Failure? . .. 21 E. Future Directions. .. 25 II. Company/Product Profiles. .. 27 A. Multi/Parallel Processors . .. 29 1. Alliant . .. 31 2. Astronautics. .. 35 3. Concurrent . .. 37 4. Cydrome. .. 41 5. Eastman Kodak. .. 45 6. Elxsi . .. 47 Contents iii 7. Encore ............... 51 8. Flexible . ... 55 9. Floating Point Systems - M64line ................... 59 10. International Parallel ........................... 61 11. Loral .................................... 63 12. Masscomp ................................. 65 13. Meiko .................................... 67 14. Multiflow. ~ ................................ 69 15. Sequent................................... 71 B. Massively Parallel . 75 1. Ametek.................................... 77 2. Bolt Beranek & Newman Advanced Computers ...........
  • Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M

    Network Working Group S. Kirkpatrick Request for Comments: 1166 M. Stahl Obsoletes RFCs: 1117, 1020, 997, 990, 960, 943, M. Recker 943, 923, 900, 870, 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, July 1990 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 INTERNET NUMBERS Status of this Memo This memo is a status report on the network numbers and autonomous system numbers used in the Internet community. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Table of Contents Introduction.................................................... 1 Network Numbers................................................. 4 Class A Networks................................................ 7 Class B Networks................................................ 8 Class C Networks................................................ 47 Other Reserved Internet Addresses............................... 100 Network Totals.................................................. 101 Autonomous System Numbers....................................... 102 Documents....................................................... 111 Contacts........................................................ 115 Security Considerations......................................... 182 Authors' Addresses.............................................. 182 Introduction This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned network numbers and gateway autonomous systems. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Hostmaster at the DDN Network Information
  • 28521 Folder

    28521 Folder

    5445 NE Dawson Creek Drive Hillsboro, OR 97124 Toll-Free: 1-800-950-0044 Phone: 1-503-615-1100 FAX: 1-503-615-1121 Balance is All Internet E-Mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.radisys.com/ customer focused market diversity technology partner financial foundation RADISYS 2002 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL 2002 RADISYS Financial Overview To our shareholders 2002 (In thousands, except per share data) Years Ended December 31, 2002 was an important year for RadiSys. Our team did an exceptional job diversifying our revenue base, winning new business and driving our financial model to break-even. This was accomplished while making Consolidated Statement of Operations Data 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 significant investments in research and development and introducing compelling new products for our customers. Our investments in new products enabled the Company to achieve 46 new design wins. These Revenues $200,139 $227,752 $340,676 $251,090 $186,548 design wins are with large customers in a diverse set of end markets. I believe this strong customer position Gross profit $ 59,272 $ 35,172 $116,897 $ 92,297 $ 62,684 will be the foundation for our long-term success. We also strengthened our balance sheet by generating $18 million of operating cash flow and exiting the year with $119 million in cash and investments. I believe (Loss) income from operations $ (7,676) $(60,332) $ 34,005 $ 16,604 $ 8,569 our accomplishments, coupled with our deep customer relationships and increased market diversification, position us well as a leading embedded solutions provider in our industry. Net (loss) income $ (3,305) $(34,486) $ 32,646 $ 18,997 $ 7,818 Net (loss) income per share (diluted)* $ (0.19) $ (2.00) $ 1.80 $ 1.11 $ 0.48 Customer focused Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)* 17,495 17,249 18,161 17,110 16,129 We have an impressive list of customers in each of our addressable markets.
  • Charitable Company Match List

    Charitable Company Match List

    The Aloha Lacrosse Club is an IRS 501(c)3 non-profit organization. This means that your financial or property donation is 100% tax deductible! There are also many companies in the Beaverton/Portland area that will match an employee's contribution. Please check with your HR department regarding your companies policy to matching your donations! Local Companies that Match Employee's Charitable Contributions Abbott Laboratories GlaxoSmithKline Foundation Paccess Supply Chain Solutions ABR, Inc. GlobalGiving Pacific Power Foundation ACE Foundation Matching Gift Program Global Standards, LLC Piper Jaffary Foundation Ada County Association of Realtors Foundation Portland General Electric ADP Hanna Andersson Portland Trail Blazers Aetna Hewlett-Packard Pepsi Bottling Group Alaska Airlines H. J. Heinz/Ore-Ida Company Foundation PPG Industries Foundation Albertson’s, Inc. Hunter-Davisson, Inc. Allendale Insurance Home Depot Matching Gifts Quest Diagnostics Allstate Houghton Mifflin Matching Gifts Qwest Communications Foundation Altria Employee Involvement Program HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Amgen Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon American Express Intermountain Gas Industries Foundation Rejuvenation, Inc American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Intel REI Ameriprise IBM International Foundation Matching Grants Rockwell Collins Corporation Ames Planning Associates, Inc. Insurance Services Office, Inc. Aon Foundation Matching Gift Program SAP Apple John Hancock Financial Services Sara Lee Foundation Applied Materials Johnson & Johnson Family of Companies S.D. Deacon Corp. Ares Operations, LLC Johnson Controls Foundation Shell Oil Company Arkema Group Starbucks Coffee AT&T Foundation Matching Gifts Center Key Bank Synopsys Autodesk, Inc Kaiser Permanente Matching Gifts Saint-Gobain Corporation Foundation Kaplan, Inc. SBC Foundation Bank of America KPMG Sprint Foundation Bank Of The West SRG Partnership Becker Capital Management Laika Standard Insurance Bechtel Legacy Health System Stockamp & Associates Benjamin Moore & Co.
  • Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis

    Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis

    NPL Report CMMT(A) 152 Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis M. Stewart & M. G. Cain National Physical Laboratory D. A. Hall University of Manchester May 1999 Ferroelectric Hysteresis Measurement & Analysis M. Stewart & M. G. Cain Centre for Materials Measurement and Technology National Physical Laboratory Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK. D. A. Hall Manchester Materials Science Centre University of Manchester and UMIST Manchester, M1 7HS, UK. Summary It has become increasingly important to characterise the performance of piezoelectric materials under conditions relevant to their application. Piezoelectric materials are being operated at ever increasing stresses, either for high power acoustic generation or high load/stress actuation, for example. Thus, measurements of properties such as, permittivity (capacitance), dielectric loss, and piezoelectric displacement at high driving voltages are required, which can be used either in device design or materials processing to enable the production of an enhanced, more competitive product. Techniques used to measure these properties have been developed during the DTI funded CAM7 programme and this report aims to enable a user to set up one of these facilities, namely a polarisation hysteresis loop measurement system. The report describes the technique, some example hardware implementations, and the software algorithms used to perform the measurements. A version of the software is included which, although does not allow control of experimental equipment, does include all the analysis features and will allow analysis of data captured independently. ã Crown copyright 1999 Reproduced by permission of the Controller of HMSO ISSN 1368-6550 May 1999 National Physical Laboratory Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom, TW11 0LW Extracts from this report may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged.
  • 2010 Alumni and Business Partner Awards

    2010 Alumni and Business Partner Awards

    2010 ALUMNI AND BUSINESS PARTNER AWARDS THURSDAY, MAY 6, 2010 THE GOVERNOR HOTEL — PORTLAND Hit the ground running. Intensive. Innovative. Integrated. Whether you are a continuing student or working professional, Oregon State University’s Master of Business Administration prepares you for the challenges of today’s global marketplace. Through experiential learning, you’ll cultivate an entrepreneurial mindset that emphasizes social responsibility, sustainability, and ethics. Complete your degree in as little as nine months. Evening classes available. Global Top 100 www.bus.oregonstate.edu 2 OSU College of Business 2010 Alumni and Business Partner Awards A word from OSU President Ed Ray By Edward J. Ray, President Brown, who retired from a tre- the many reasons why the college that emphasize experiential learn- Oregon State University mendously successful career as a continues to grow in size, impact ing and for students who graduate PricewaterhouseCoopers partner and reputation. Enrollment last prepared to make a difference, Oregon State University has and now teaches at OSU as an fall included 2,327 undergraduate the college is now on the cusp of always been a place with a pur- Executive in Residence—embody and graduate students, compared a bold and exciting new era. As pose—that of making a measure- the very best of Oregon State. Their to 1,775 just ten years ago. Like state and business leaders look able difference in the lives and professional contributions and the rest of our university, the col- with growing consistency to our communities
  • NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq Exchange”), a Subsidiary of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc

    NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq Exchange”), a Subsidiary of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc

    July 31, 2006 Nancy M. Morris, Esq. Secretary US Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 RE: Request for Relief from § 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Dear Ms. Morris: On January 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) approved the application of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq Exchange”), a subsidiary of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”), to register under Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act” or “Exchange Act”) as a national securities exchange.1 Nasdaq’s transition of its listing and trading activities to the Nasdaq Exchange will further Congress’s instruction to promote “fair competition . between exchange markets.”2 Absent the relief requested herein, however, Nasdaq’s transition to a national securities exchange would require approximately 3,200 Nasdaq Global Market3 and Capital Market issuers with securities registered pursuant to the Act, or exempt from registration under Section 12(g) of the Act,4 to file registration statements5 to register those securities under Section 12(b) of the Act.6 1 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 (January 23, 2006) (the “Exchange Approval Order”). 2 Exchange Act Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(ii). 3 Effective July 1, 2006, Nasdaq renamed the Nasdaq National Market as the Nasdaq Global Market and created a new segment within the Global Market called the Global Select Market. References to the Nasdaq Global Market include those securities listed on the Nasdaq Global Market and the Nasdaq Global Select Market. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
  • Companies with Matching Gift Programs

    Companies with Matching Gift Programs

    Companies with Matching Gift Programs Many companies encourage charitable giving by matching gifts made by their employees. As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, CHCA is eligible for matching gifts. Below is a list of companies that have matching gift programs. Even if a company is not listed, they may still have a matching gift program. In addition, not all companies match PK-12 schools. To find out if your company matches gifts made to CHCA, please contact your HR representative. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail Paige Tomlin at [email protected]. A AK Steel 3Com Corporation Albemarle Corp. 3M Company Alco Standard AlliedSignal Inc. Alexander and Baldwin Inc. Allstate Alexander Hamilton Life Abacus Capital Investments Alexander Haas Martin and Partners Abbott Laboratories Al Neyer Altera Corp. Contributions Allegro Microsystems Inc. Accenture Alliance Bernstein Access Fund Alliance Capital Management L.P. ACE INA Foundation Alliance Coal LLC Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. Alliant Techsystems Altria Group Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Adaptec Foundation Allendale Insurance Foundation AMBAC Indemnity American Natl Bank & Trust ADC Telecommunications American Intl Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving American Standard Found Adobe Systems Inc. Amgen Inc. ADP Foundation AMN Healthcare Services American Express Co. AmSouth BanCorp. A & E Television Networks American Stock Exchange AEGON TRANSAMERICA Ameriprise Financial AEP Ameritech Corp. AES Corporation AMETEK / Sealtron A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. AMSTED Industries Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Amylin Pharmaceuticals Aetna Foundation, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. American General Corp. Analytics Operations Engineering AG Communications Systems Analog Devices Inc. American Honda Motor Co. Avon Products Foundation, Inc.
  • Service Manual TDS 520B, 540B, 620B, TDS 644B, TDS 680B, TDS 684B, TDS 724A, TDS 744A, & TDS 784A Digitizing Oscilloscope 07

    Service Manual TDS 520B, 540B, 620B, TDS 644B, TDS 680B, TDS 684B, TDS 724A, TDS 744A, & TDS 784A Digitizing Oscilloscope 07

    Service Manual TDS 520B, 540B, 620B, TDS 644B, TDS 680B, TDS 684B, TDS 724A, TDS 744A, & TDS 784A Digitizing Oscilloscope 070-9386-03 Warning The servicing instructions are for use by qualified personnel only. To avoid personal injury, do not perform any servicing unless you are qualified to do so. Refer to the Safety Summary prior to performing service. Copyright E Tektronix, Inc. All rights reserved. Tektronix products are covered by U.S. and foreign patents, issued and pending. Information in this publication supercedes that in all previously published material. Specifications and price change privileges reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Tektronix, Inc., P.O. Box 1000, Wilsonville, OR 97070–1000 TEKTRONIX and TEK are registered trademarks of Tektronix, Inc. WARRANTY Tektronix warrants that this product will be free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of three (3) years from the date of shipment. If any such product proves defective during this warranty period, Tektronix, at its option, either will repair the defective product without charge for parts and labor, or will provide a replacement in exchange for the defective product. In order to obtain service under this warranty, Customer must notify Tektronix of the defect before the expiration of the warranty period and make suitable arrangements for the performance of service. Customer shall be responsible for packaging and shipping the defective product to the service center designated by Tektronix, with shipping charges prepaid. Tektronix shall pay for the return of the product to Customer if the shipment is to a location within the country in which the Tektronix service center is located.
  • R00456--FM Getting up to Speed

    R00456--FM Getting up to Speed

    GETTING UP TO SPEED THE FUTURE OF SUPERCOMPUTING Susan L. Graham, Marc Snir, and Cynthia A. Patterson, Editors Committee on the Future of Supercomputing Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Gov- erning Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engi- neering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for ap- propriate balance. Support for this project was provided by the Department of Energy under Spon- sor Award No. DE-AT01-03NA00106. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 0-309-09502-6 (Book) International Standard Book Number 0-309-54679-6 (PDF) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2004118086 Cover designed by Jennifer Bishop. Cover images (clockwise from top right, front to back) 1. Exploding star. Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) Center for Supernova Research, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science. 2. Hurricane Frances, September 5, 2004, taken by GOES-12 satellite, 1 km visible imagery. U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. 3. Large-eddy simulation of a Rayleigh-Taylor instability run on the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory MCR Linux cluster in July 2003.
  • PLANAR SYSTEMS INC Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter

    PLANAR SYSTEMS INC Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington D.C 20549 Amendment No Form 10-K/A Mark One 12025225 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30 2011 or fl TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No 0-23018 00 PLANAR SYSTEMS INC Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter Oregon 93-0835396 State or other jurisdiction IRS Employer of incorporation Identification No 1195 NW Compton Drive Beaverton Oregon 97006 503 748-1100 Address of principal executive offices Zip Code Registrants Telephone Number Including Area Code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12b of the Act Common Stock Preferred Stock Purchase Rights NASDAQ Global Market Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Securities registered pursuant to Section 12g of the Act None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes No IEJ Indicate check if the by mark registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15d of the Act Yes No Indicate check whether the by mark registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports and has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes No Indicate
  • Vanport Society

    Vanport Society

    DONOR HONOR ROLL 2014-2015 | Recognizes gifts received between July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015. Earle Chiles William Michael Foster Family Phil Bogue VANPORT Sue Cooley Friends from Indonesia Duncan and Cindy Campbell Jeannine Cowles Gerding Edlen Development Norm and Rickie Daniels SOCIETY Michael DeShane ◊ and Keren Brown Wilson ◊ John and Betty Gray Geography Fund of the Laura and Doug Eyer Mark and Ann Edlen Oregon Community Foundation Les and Nancy Fahey Diana Gerding Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Tom and Marilyn Fink The Vanport Society recognizes Terry Harrington Howard Hughes Medical Institute Bill and Jane Furman donors whose lifetime giving to Al and Nancy Jubitz Intel Corporation/Intel Foundation Jack and Deane Garrison Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Portland State University is Irving Levin and Stephanie Fowler Bob Gleason ◊ • W.M. Keck Foundation $100,000 or more. With deep Lawrence Levy and Pamela Lindholm- Levy Dan and Karen Halloran W. K. Kellogg Foundation gratitude, we honor all members Jack and Lynn Loacker Debra C. Harris ◊ The Lemelson Foundation of the Vanport Society. Lorry Lokey Art and Sandy James Bob and Sharon Miller LTX-Credence Phil and Penny Knight Rick and Erika Miller Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund Davis and Judy Moriuchi Gordon and Betty Moore Mentor Graphics Corporation/Mentor Graphics Bob Rawson Foundation FREMONT MEMBERS Robert and Jane Morrow Julie and William Reiersgaard Meyer Memorial Trust $10 MILLION AND ABOVE Martha and John O’Malley Dick Solomon and Alyce Flitcraft M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust Jim and Shirley Rippey Spike Wadsworth and Sherry Sheng INDIVIDUALS Oracle America, Inc. John Salmon and Marcia Schulmerich Fariborz and Azam Maseeh The Oregon Community Foundation CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, Allen Ray Sandstrom ORGANIZATIONS The Pew Charitable Trusts CORPORATIONS, FOUNDATIONS, Arlene Schnitzer Anonymous ORGANIZATIONS Portland General Electric Company/PGE Jordan Schnitzer Foundation The Autzen Foundation Massiah Foundation, Inc.