DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1.0 Table of Contents 2.0 Executive Summary 3.0 Project Description 3.1 Basic Project Information III-1 3.1.1 The EIS Team III-4 3.1.2 EIA Approach and Methodology III-4 3.1.4 EIA Process Documentation III-5 3.1.5 Field Visits and Investigation III-9 3.1.6 Public Consultations III-9 3.2 Project Location and Accessibility III-13 3.2.1 Primary Impact Area III-16 3.2.2 Secondary Impact Area III-17 3.3 Project Rationale III-19 3.4 Project Components III-24 3.4.1 Plan of Operations III-25 3.4.2 Mine Development Works III-33 3.5 Description of Project Phases 3.5.1 Exploration Works III-36 3.5.2 The Mining Operation III-37 3.6 Elements of the Mining Operation 3.6.1 Mine Design and Plan III-40 3.6.2 Environmental Mitigating Measures III-42 3.7 General Mine Development Plan III-44 3.8 Power Supply III-47 3.9 Water Supply III-47 3.10 Loading System III-47 3.11 Housing III-47 4.0 Summary of Scoping Agreements 4.1 EIS Document IV-1 4.2 Scope of the Study IV-1 5.0 Baseline Environmental Setting 5.1 Brief Profile of the Province of Palawan V-1 5.1.1 Economic Profile V-1 5.1.2 Infrastructure and Utilities V-3 5.1.3 Peace and Order V-3 5.2 Location of the Project Area V-3 5.3 Description of Existing Environmental Setting and Condition 5.3.1 Baseline Environmental Conditions V-4 5.3.2 Geology and Geomorphology V-6 5.3.3 Seismic Potential V-6 5.3.4 Geologic Setting V-8 5.3.4.1 Lithology V-9 5.3.4.2 Lithological Control and Alteration V-11 5.3.5 Topography and Geomorphology V-11 5.3.6 Ore Resource Estimate V-12 5.3.7 Hydrology and Hydrogeology V-15 5.4 Water Quality and Limnology: Ground and Coastal Waters V-16 5.4.1 Physico-chemical Parameters V-16 5.4.2 Microbiological Analysis of Water Samples V-16 5.4.3 Sediment Heavy Metal Analysis V-17 5.4.4 Stream Flow Measurements V-17 5.4.5 Collection of Samples and Sampling Locations V-17 5.4.6 Temperature V-22 5.4.7 Turbidity V-23 5.4.8 Total Dissolved Solids V-24 5.4.9 Total Suspended Solids V-24 5.4.10 pH and Alkalinity V-25 5.4.11 Color V-26 5.4.12 Dissolved Oxygen V-26 5.4.13 Water Hardness V-27 5.4.14 Salinity V-28 5.4.15 Nitrogen Metabolites V-28 5.4.16 Phosphates V-29 5.5 Stream Flow and Discharge V-30 5.6 Microbiological (coliform) Analyses V-31 5.7 Heavy Metals in Sediments V-31 5.7.1 Arsenic V-31 5.7.2 Chromium V-32 5.7.3 Lead V-34 5.7.4 Nickel V-35 5.7.5 Mercury V-37 5.8 Pedology and Land Use 5.8.1 Rationale V-40 5.8.2 Methodology V-40 5.8.3 Sampling Sites V-44 5.8.4 Results V-48 5.9 Physical Oceanography 5.9.1 Tides V-58 5.9.2 Ocean Currents V-58 5.10 Meteorology 5.10.1 Rainfall V-60 5.10.2 Temperature V-60 5.10.3 Relative Humidity V-60 5.10.4 Wind Speed and Direction V-60 5.10.5 Frequency of Tropical Cyclones V-61 5.10.6 Discussion of Meteorological Parameters V-67 5.11 Air and Noise Quality 5.11.1 Methodology V-68 5.11.2 Results V-68 5.12 Biological Environment 5.12.1 Terrestrial Fauna 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background and Purpose V-71 1.2 Limitations of the Study V-71 2.0 General Features of the Area 2.1 The Study Area V-72 2.2 Vegetation and Forest Cover V-72 a. Mangrove and Nipa Grove V-72 b. Beach forest V-72 c. Parang vegetation V-73 d. Agricultural and horticultural areas V-75 e. Forest over ultramafic soil V-75 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Site Selection V-75 3.2 Field Methods V-75 3.3 Specimen Handling V-77 3.4 Data Management and Entry V-77 3.5 Data Analysis V-77 4.0 Results and Discussions 4.1 Wildlife Vertebrates of the study area V-78 a. Amphibians V-79 b. Reptiles V-80 c. Avifauna V-82 d. Mammalian Fauna V-84 4.2 Comparison of vertebrates per sampling area V-86 a. Gen vertebrate characteristics of the study area V-86 b. Vertebrate characteristics per sampling site V-87 4.3 Vertebrate Species Diversity V-89 4.4 Frequent Species V-90 4.5 Species Endemism V-90 4.6 Threatened and endangered vertebrate species V-91 4.7 Trophic relation V-92 4.8 Ethnozoological survey V-93 5.12.2 Terrestrial Flora 1.0 Vegetation Cover V-96 2.0 Sampling Stations V-98 2.1 Transect 1 V-98 3.0 Discussion V-100 4.0 Recommendation V-104 5.13 Marine Biology 5.13.1 Coral Reef V-105 5.13.2.1 Methodology V-105 5.13.2.2 Results V-105 a. Corals V-106 b. Reef associated fishes V-107 c. Discussion V-109 5.13.2 Seaweeds V-113 5.13.2.1 Methodology V-113 5.13.2.2 Results V-115 a. Species composition V-115 b. Frequency and Percent Cover V-116 c. Associated fishes V-118 d. Discussion V-120 5.13.3 Seagrass 5.13.3.1 Methodology V-123 5.13.3.2 Results V-123 5.13.3.3 Discussion V-124 5.14 Cultural, Economic and Political Environment 5.14.1 The Social Environment V-125 5.14.1.1 Baseline Characterization of Impact Area 5.14.1.2 Community Profile V-127 a. Topography V-130 b. Demography V-129 c. Health and Nutrition V-131 d. Water, Sanitation and Electricity V-132 e. Shelter V-133 f. Education and Literacy V-133 g. Income, Livelihood and Employment V-135 h. Waste Management V-138 i. Participation and Community Development V-138 j. Development Interventions V-138 k. Public Participation and Social Acceptability V-139 6.0 Environmental Impacts 6.1 Geology VI-1 6.1.1 Seismic Hazards VI-1 6.1.2 Start-up impacts VI-1 6.1.3 Mining Operations VI-2 6.2 Pedology 6.2.1 Preparation and Start-up VI-2 6.2.2 Impacts on Soil During Operation Phase VI-4 6.3 Land Use 6.3.1 General Impacts on Land Use below 500m elev VI-5 6.4 Agriculture 6.4.1 Impacts on Agriculture VI-6 6.5 Forestry 6.5.1 General Impacts of the project VI-8 6.5.2 Impacts during construction VI-9 6.5.3 Impacts of operation VI-10 6.6 Wildlife 6.6.1 Environmental Impacts during start-up phase VI-10 6.6.2 Impacts during operation VI-12 6.7 Hydrology 6.7.1 Impacts during construction VI-13 6.7.2 Impacts during operation VI-15 6.8 Water Quality 6.8.1 Impacts during construction VI-17 6.8.2 Impacts during operation VI-18 6.9 Freshwater Biology 6.9.1 Impacts during construction VI-19 6.9.2 Impacts during operation VI-19 6.10 Marine Ecosystem 6.10.1 Impacts during start-up and Operation VI-20 6.11 Oceanography 6.11.1 Impacts during start-up VI-22 6.11.2 Impacts during operation VI-22 6.12 Air Quality 6.12.1 Impacts during start-up of operation VI-23 6.12.2 Noise during start-up and operation VI-23 7.0 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 7.1 Rehabilitation Aspects VII-2 7.1.1 Land Use VII-3 7.1.2 Agriculture VII-4 7.1.3 Forestry VII-5 7.1.4 Wildlife VII-6 7.1.5 Hydrology VII-7 7.1.6 Water Quality VII-7 7.1.7 Freshwater Biology VII-8 7.1.8 Marine Ecosystem VII-8 7.1.9 Oceanography VII-9 7.1.10 Meteorology VII-9 7.2 Socio-Economics 7.2.1 Public and Workers health and Safety VII-14 7.2.2 Archeology VII-15 7.3 Institutional Development VII-15 7.4 Monitoring System VII-16 7.5 Abandonment Plan VII-16 8.0 Recommendations 8.1 Objectives of the Livelihood Program VIII-1 8.2 Strategies VIII-1 8.3 Promotion of Small-scale industries VIII-3 8.4 Training Programs VIII-3 8.5 Geos Inc. Agro-forestry Development Progrm VIII-3 8.6 Environmental Monitoring Plan VIII-4 9.0 Environmental Management Plan 9.1 Construction/Contractor’s Environment Program IX-1 9.2 Social Development Program IX-4 9.2.1 Social Development and Management Plan IX-5 9.2.2 SDMP Implementation Strategies IX-8 9.3 Risk Management Program 9.3.1 Project Development Activities IX-9 9.3.2 Identification and evaluation of hazards and its Potential impacts IX-11 9.3.3 Health impact of the identified hazards IX-20 9.3.4 Identification of impact population or receptors IX-25 9.3.5 Health risk assessment IX-25 9.4 Environmental Health Risk Management 9.4.1 Reduction of Community Health Risk IX-26 9.4.2 Reduction of Occupational Health Risk IX-27 9.5 Environmental Health Monitoring IX-30 9.6 Abandonment Plan IX-31 9.7 Environmental Monitoring Plan IX-31 10.0 Contingent Liability and Rehabilitation Fund X-1 11.0 Commitments and Agreements XI-1 12.0 Commitments to the Indigenous Peoples XII-1 ANNEXES Annex 1 Factual Background: Citinickel vis-à-vis PGMC Annex 1A MPSA Operating Agreement, Olympic and PGMC, July 18, 2003 Annex 1B Olympic letter to PGMC, termination of agreement, April 24, 2006 Annex 1C Deed of Assignment, Citinickel/Olympic, June 9, 2006 Annex 1D DENR Order, cancellation of ECCs, July 31, 2006 Annex 1E DENR Decision, cancellation of SSMPs given to PGMC, Oct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands
    Micronesica 29(1): 37-48 , 1996 Reptiles, Birds, and Mammals of Pakin Atoll, Eastern Caroline Islands DONALD W. BUDEN Division Mathematics of and Science, College of Micronesia, P. 0 . Box 159 Kolonia, Polmpei, Federated States of Micronesia 96941. Abstract-Fifteen species of reptiles, 18 birds, and five mammals are recorded from Pakin Atoll. None is endemic to Pakin and all of the residents tend to be widely distributed throughout Micronesia. Intro­ duced species include four mammals (Rattus exulans, Canis fami/iaris, Fe/is catus, Sus scrofa), the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gal/us) among birds, and at least one lizard (Varanus indicus). Of the 17 indigenous birds, ten are presumed or documented breeding residents, including four land birds, a heron, and five terns. The Micronesian Honeyeater (My=omela rubratra) is the most common land bird, followed closely by the Micro­ nesian Starling (Aplonis opaca). The vegetation is mainly Cocos forest, considerably modified by periodic cutting of the undergrowth, deliber­ ately set fires, and the rooting of pigs. Most of the present vertebrate species do not appear to be seriously endangered by present levels of human activity. But the Micronesian Pigeon (Ducula oceanica) is less numerous on the settled islands, probably reflecting increased hunting pressure, and sea turtles (especially Chelonia mydas) and their eggs are harvested indiscriminately . Introduction Terrestrial vertebrates have been poorly studied on many of the remote atolls of Micronesia, and distributional records are lacking or scanty for many islands. The present study documents the occurrence and relative abundance of reptiles, birds, and mammals on Pakin Atoll for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I ABATAN WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
    Part I [Type text] Page 0 Abatan Watershed Characterization Report and Integrated Watershed Management Plan September 2010 Part I ABATAN WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION REPORT I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Abatan Watershed is the third largest of the 11 major watershed networks that support water needs and other requirements of the island province of Bohol. It covers some 38,628 hectares or close to 9% of the province‟s total land area. It has three distinct land divisions, coastal, lowland and upland. The coastal areas are marine and not along the most of the river. Table 1. Municipalities and their barangays comprising the Abatan Watershed Municipality Barangay Percent Angilan, Bantolinao, Bicahan, Bitaugan, Bungahan, Can-omay, Canlaas, 1. Antequera Cansibuan, Celing, Danao, Danicop, Mag-aso, Poblacion, Quinapon-an, 100 Santo Rosario, Tabuan, Tagubaas, Tupas, Ubojan, Viga, and Villa Aurora Baucan Norte, Baucan Sur, Boctol, Boyog Sur, Cabad, Candasig, Cantalid, Cantomimbo, Datag Norte, Datag Sur, Del Carmen Este, Del Carmen Norte, 2. Balilihan 71 Del Carmen Sur, Del Carmen Weste, Dorol, Haguilanan Grande, Magsija, Maslog, Sagasa, Sal-ing, San Isidro, and San Roque 3. Calape Cabayugan, Sampoangon, and Sohoton 9 Alegria, Ambuan, Bongbong, Candumayao, Causwagan, Haguilanan, 4. Catigbian Libertad Sur, Mantasida, Poblacion, Poblacion Weste, Rizal, and 54 Sinakayanan 5. Clarin Cabog, Danahao, and Tubod 12 Anislag, Canangca-an, Canapnapan, Cancatac, Pandol, Poblacion, and 6. Corella 88 Tanday Fatima, Loreto, Lourdes, Malayo Norte, Malayo Sur, Monserrat, New 7. Cortes Lourdes, Patrocinio, Poblacion, Rosario, Salvador, San Roque, and Upper de 93 la Paz 8. Loon Campatud 1 9. Maribojoc Agahay, Aliguay, Busao, Cabawan, Lincod, San Roque, and Toril 39 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry & Buden 1999
    Micronesica 31(2):263-273. 1999 Ecology, behavior and color variation of the green tree skink, Lamprolepis smaragdina (Lacertilia: Scincidae), in Micronesia GAD PERRY Brown Tree Snake Project, P.O. Box 8255, MOU-3, Dededo, Guam 96912, USA and Department of Zoology, Ohio State University, 1735 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. [email protected]. DONALD W. BUDEN College of Micronesia, Division of Mathematics and Science, P.O. Box 159, Palikir, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia 96941 Abstract—We studied populations of the green tree skink, Lamprolepis smaragdina, at three main sites in Micronesia: Pohnpei (Federated States of Micronesia, FSM) and Saipan and Tinian (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, CNMI). We also surveyed Rota (CNMI), where the skink has not been recorded in previous surveys, to verify its absence. Our main goal was to describe some basic biology traits at these sites. Observations were carried out between 1993 and 1998. We used focal animal observations and visual surveys to describe the relative abundance, elevational distribution, behavior (perch choice, foraging behavior, activity time), and coloration of the species at each of the three sites. This information was then used to compare these populations in order to assess the origin of the CNMI populations. As expected, we found no green tree skink on Rota. We found few differences among the three populations we did locate, Pohnpei, Tinian, and Saipan. Perch diameters and body orientations were similar between the three sites, as were population densities and foraging behaviors. However, Tinian’s lizards perched lower than those of Pohnpei or Saipan, probably due to the smaller trees available to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Biogeography of Philippine Geckos Challenges Predictions from a Paradigm of Climate-Driven Vicariant Diversification Across an Island Archipelago
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/395434; this version posted April 16, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Running head: Comparative biogeography of Philippine geckos The comparative biogeography of Philippine geckos challenges predictions from a paradigm of climate-driven vicariant diversification across an island archipelago Jamie R. Oaks ∗1, Cameron D. Siler2, and Rafe M. Brown3 1Department of Biological Sciences & Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA 2Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73072-7029 3Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA April 16, 2019 Abstract A primary goal of biogeography is to understand how large-scale environmental pro- cesses, like climate change, affect diversification. One often-invoked but seldom tested process is the “species-pump” model, in which repeated bouts of co-speciation are driven by oscillating climate-induced habitat connectivity cycles. For example, over the past three million years, the landscape of the Philippine Islands has repeatedly coalesced and fragmented due to sea-level changes associated with glacial cycles. This repeated climate-driven vicariance has been proposed as a model of speciation across evolu- tionary lineages codistributed throughout the islands. This model predicts speciation times that are temporally clustered around the times when interglacial rises in sea level fragmented the islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Sphenomorphus): Three New Species from the Mountains of Luzon and Clarification of the Status of the Poorly Knowns
    Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 13 october 2010 number 42:1–27 Species boundaries in Philippine montane forest skinks (Genus Sphenomorphus): three new species from the mountains of Luzon and clarification of the status of the poorly knownS. beyeri, S. knollmanae, and S. laterimaculatus By RAFe.m..BROwN1,2,6,.CHARleS.w..lINkem1,.ARvIN.C..DIeSmOS2,.DANIlO.S..BAleTe3,.melIzAR.v..DUyA4,. AND.JOHN.w..FeRNeR5 1 Natural History Museum, Biodiversity Institute, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, KS 66045-7561, U.S.A.; E-mail: (RMB) [email protected]; (CWL) [email protected] 2 Herpetology Section, Zoology Division, National Museum of the Philippines, Executive House, P. Burgos Street, Rizal Park, Metro Manila, Philippines; E-mail: (ACD) [email protected] 3 Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605; E-mail: [email protected] 4 Conservation International Philippines, No. 6 Maalalahanin Street, Teachers Village, Diliman 1101 Quezon City; Philippines. Cur- rent Address: 188 Francisco St., Guinhawa Subd., Malolos, Bulacan 3000 Philippines; E-mail: [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, Thomas More College, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, 41017, U.S.A.; E-mail: [email protected] 6 Corresponding author Contents ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Diversity of Squamates (Scaled Reptiles) in Selected Urban Areas of Cagayan de Oro City, Misamis Oriental. John C Naelga*, Daniel Robert P Tayag, Hazel L Yañez, and Astrid L Sinco. Xavier University – Ateneo De Cagayan, Kinaadman Resource Center. ABSTRACT This study was conducted to provide baseline information on the local urban diversity of squamates in the selected areas of Barangay Kauswagan, Barangay Balulang, and Barangay FS Catanico in Cagayan de Oro City. These urban sites are close to the river and are likely to be inhabited by reptiles. Each site had at least ten (10) points and was sampled no less than five (5) times in the months of September to November 2016 using homemade traps and the Cruising-Transect walk method. One representative per species was preserved. A total of two hundred sixty-seven (267) individuals, grouped into four (4) families and ten (10) species were found in the sampling areas. Six (6) snake species were identified, namely: Boiga cynodon, Naja samarensis, Chrysopelea paradisi, Gonyosoma oxycephalum, Coelegnathus erythrurus eryhtrurus, and Dendrelaphis pictus; while four (4) species were lizards namely: Gekko gecko, Hemidactylus platyurus, Lamprolepis smaragdina philippinica, and Eutropis multifasciata.In Barangay Kauswagan, Hemidactylus platyurus was the most abundant (RA= 52.94%). In Barangay Balulang, the most abundant species was Hemidactylus platyurus (RA= 43.82%). In Barangay FS Catanico, the most abundant was Hemidactylus platyurus (RA= 40.16%). The area with the highest species diversity was Barangay FS Catanico (H= 1.36), followed by Barangay Balulang (H= 1.28), and Barangay Kauswagan (H= 1.08).
    [Show full text]
  • Gekkotan Lizard Taxonomy
    3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% H 2% 4% A M A D R Y 3% 5% A GEKKOTAN LIZARD TAXONOMY 2% 4% D ARNOLD G. KLUGE V O 3% 5% L 2% 4% 26 NO.1 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 5% 2% 4% J A 3% 5% N 2% 4% U A R Y 3% 5% 2 2% 4% 0 0 1 VOL. 26 NO. 1 JANUARY, 2001 3% 5% 2% 4% INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRIBUTORS Hamadryad publishes original papers dealing with, but not necessarily restricted to, the herpetology of Asia. Re- views of books and major papers are also published. Manuscripts should be only in English and submitted in triplicate (one original and two copies, along with three cop- ies of all tables and figures), printed or typewritten on one side of the paper. Manuscripts can also be submitted as email file attachments. Papers previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere should not be submitted. Final submissions of accepted papers on disks (IBM-compatible only) are desirable. For general style, contributors are requested to examine the current issue of Hamadryad. Authors with access to publication funds are requested to pay US$ 5 or equivalent per printed page of their papers to help defray production costs. Reprints cost Rs. 2.00 or 10 US cents per page inclusive of postage charges, and should be ordered at the time the paper is accepted. Major papers exceeding four pages (double spaced typescript) should contain the following headings: Title, name and address of author (but not titles and affiliations), Abstract, Key Words (five to 10 words), Introduction, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, Literature Cited (only the references cited in the paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Lizards of the CNMI
    -- r ,~ •• '/ If I !< A CHECKLIST AND KEY TO THE AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF THE MARIANAS. By Thomas H. Fritts, Gordon H. Rodda, and Michael J. McCoid (order of authors yet to be determined) . Notes on Using the Key.--Our aim has been to reduce the number of technical characteristics and subtle distinctions that must be made in order to identify individual species whenever possible. However, in some cases and especially when distinguishing species which are superficially similar, the most definitive characteristics involve counting or noting the relative size of the scales on specific parts of the body. The user of these keys should not be intimidated by this feature; often an identification can be made using other characteristics but additional definitive characters should be used whenever any doubt exists about ~he identification suggested. The undersides of the digits (toes or fingers) of all lizards are covered by scales called subdigital lamellae. The toes of geckos are usually but not always widened to increase the surface area of the toe in contact with the substrate. The subdigital lamellae of geckos are typically in one of three basic patterns: undivided with the individual lamellae extending uninterrupted from one side of the digit to the other; divided with a medial groove or suture dividing the subdigital lamellae into pairs of scales; and distally divided where the lamallae near the tip of the digit are divided, but not divided basally. Lamellae are usually counted on the longest digit (4th digit when 5 are present), and from the tip of the digit to the base but only along one side of the digit when the scales are paired.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Wildlife Management in Solomon Islands
    I I I I SURVEY OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT I, IN SOLOMON ISLANDS I I '· SPREP PROJECT PA 17 I A JOINT PROJECT OF I SOLOMON ISLANDS GOVERNMENT, I SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRA1\1ME (SPREP), I AND I TRAFFIC (OCEANIA) I I FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 19~0 BY I TANYA LEARY I I I I I I SURVEY OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN SOLOMON ISLANDS SPREP PROJECT PA 17 A Joint Project of Solomon Islands Government, South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), and TRAFFIC (Oceania) I Final Report February 1990 by Tanya Leary I J I (ii) CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Background to the project 5 I 1.2 Objectives 5 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING ADMINISTRATION AND VOLUME OF WILDLIFE TRADE 7 2.1 Current administration of wildlife trade 7 2.1.1 Brief history of wildlife trade 7 2.1.2 Current wildlife legislation 7 2.1.3 Current administration of trade 8 2.2 Analysis of trade 8 2.2.1 Reptiles and amphibians 8 2.2.2 Butterflies and other insects 9 2.2.3 Coconut crabs 13 2.2.4 Turtles 15 I 2.2.5 Crocodiles 16 2.2.6 Birds 16 2.2.7 Mammals 16 CHAPTER3: ~AGEMENTOFTRADE 17 3.1 Reptiles and amphibians 17 3.1.1 Disoodeles guppyi 18 3.1.2 Cyrtodactylus louisiadensis 18 3.1.3 Corucia zebrata 18 3.1.4 Eugogylus albofasciolatus 18 3.1.5 Varanus indicus 19 I 3.1.6 Candoia bibroni 19 (iii) Page 3.2 Species which should no longer be exported 19 3.2.1 Varanus indicus spinulosus 19 I 3.2.2 Gonocephalus godeffroyi 19 3.2.3 Acrochordus granulatus 20 3.3 Butterflies and other insects 20 3.3.1 Administration of trade 20 I 3.3.2 Recommendations regarding
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippine Synthesis Report
    Ecosystems and People The Philippine Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Sub-Global Assessment Ecosystems and People: The Philippine Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Sub-global Assessment Edited by Rodel D. Lasco Ma. Victoria O. Espaldon University of the Philippines Los Baños/ University of the Philippines World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF-Philippines) Diliman Editorial Assistant Maricel A. Tapia A contribution to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment prepared by the Philippine Sub-global Assessment Published by: Environmental Forestry Programme College of Forestry and Natural Resources University of the Philippines Los Baños In collaboration with: Department of Environment Laguna Lake and Natural Resources Development Authority Published by the Environmental Forestry Programme College of Forestry and Natural Resources University of the Philippines Los Baños College, Laguna, Philippines 4031 © Copyright 2005 by College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños ISBN 971-547-237-0 Layout and cover design: Maricel A. Tapia This report is a contribution to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment prepared by the Philippine Sub-global Assessment Team. The report has been prepared and reviewed through a process approved by the MA Board but the report itself has not been accepted or approved by the Assessment Panel or the MA Board. CONTENTS Foreword vii Acknowledgments ix Summary for Decision Makers 1 Philippine Sub-Global Assessment: Synthesis 9 Introduction 35 Laguna Lake: Conditions and Trends 1. Overview of the Laguna Lake Basin 43 2. Laguna Lake’s Tributary River Watersheds 53 3. Water Resources 63 4. Fish 115 5. Rice 133 6. Biodiversity 151 7. Climate Change 167 8. Institutional Arrangements, Social Conflicts, and Ecosystem Trends 187 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE FRED KRAUS Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA Tel: 517-254-4120 ● Email: [email protected] EDUCATION • Ph.D., University of Michigan, Department of Biology, 1987 • B.S., University of Toledo, Department of Biology, 1980 POSITIONS • Research Scientist, University of Michigan, May. 2014–present • Assistant Research Scientist, University of Michigan, Aug. 2013–May 2014 • Research Biologist, Mississippi State University, Oct. 2012 – July 2013 • Adjunct Research Scientist, University of Michigan, Sept. 2012 – August 2013 • Research Zoologist, Bishop Museum, Aug. 2001 – Oct. 2012 • Alien Species Coordinator, Hawaii Div. of Forestry and Wildlife, Nov. 1996 – July 2001 • Affiliate Graduate Faculty, University of Hawaii, March 2001 – May 2010 • Research Associate, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Nov. 1997 – July 2001 • Adjunct Research Associate, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Sept. 1996 – Sept. 1997 • Research Associate, Dept. of Biology, University of Michigan, March 1992 – Oct. 1996 • Research Associate, The Conservation Agency, March 1991 – present • Adjunct Research Associate, Dept. of Biology, University of Michigan, July 1990 – March 1992 • Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Zoology, University of Florida, April 1988 – May 1990 • Teaching Assistant, Dept. of Biology, University of Michigan, 1980 – 81, 1984, 1986 • Research Assistant, Dept. of Biology, University of Michigan, 1983, 1984 – 85 • Field Biologist, Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, June – August 1980 RESEARCH INTERESTS • Evolution, systematics, and biogeography of the Papuan herpetofauna. • Evolution and conservation of insular faunas, especially reptiles, amphibians, and landsnails. • Patterns, processes, and ecology of alien-species invasions • Development of risk-assessment protocols for alien reptiles and amphibians. SCHOLARSHIPS AND GRANTS • National Geographic Society, ”Reptile and Amphibian Surveys of Islands in the Vitiaz Strait, Papua New Guinea”, 2018, $20,200.
    [Show full text]
  • HERPETOFAUNA TEXT 40-1.2 6/4/11 8:23 PM Page 30
    HERPETOFAUNA TEXT 40-1.2 6/4/11 8:23 PM Page 30 COLOUR-PATTERN POLYMORPHISM IN LIZARDS OF THE GENUS PRASINOHAEMA (SQUAMATA: SCINCIDAE) Fred Kraus Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817, USA The scincid genus Prasinohaema contains five mens of both sexes. The polymorphisms of named species and is restricted to New both species (originally described under the Guinea, adjacent islands along its southeast- genus Lygosoma) initially went unnoticed ern peninsula, and the Solomon Islands because type series for both were small, con- (Greer, 1974; Mys, 1988). The most notable sisting of only two male P. prehensicauda feature of this genus is that its members have (Loveridge, 1945) and a single female P. green blood plasma, a feature caused by flavipes (Parker, 1936). high concentrations of biliverdin (Austin & Despite the suggestive brief remarks made by Jessing, 1994) and not found in other Greer and Raizes (1969) and Woodruff amniotes. This imparts a greenish or bluish (1972), neither detailed descriptions nor cast to some internal tissues (Greer & Raizes, colour photographs of these colour-pattern 1969). Also noteworthy are that members of variants have been provided. This is unfortu- the genus have prehensile tails with modified nate because colour-pattern polymorphisms scales at the tip and that they are ovovivipa- of the magnitude seen in these two species rous (Greer, 1974). Relationships of Prasino- are not common among scleroglossan haema to other scincids remain uncertain lizards. I recently obtained series of both (Allison & Greer, 1986), and no attempt has species from the vicinity of Kunida, Muller yet been made to resolve relationships within Range of Southern Highlands Province, the genus.
    [Show full text]