Primitive – True Hyper- Calvinists

This article is the result of several months of dialog with Primitive Baptists (also known as Hardshell Baptists) and a good deal of time spent reading their literature. The dialog primarily consisted of email correspondence with a particularly outspoken apologist for that sect along with some interaction with several people on a Facebook Primitive Baptist discussion forum. I read articles by Primitive Baptists and former Primitive Baptists and I listened to a number of Primitive Baptist audio messages. In this article I am not out to convince the unconvinceable (i.e. diehard Primitive Baptists with their minds made up already). I am only out to warn those people who may be wondering where Primitive Baptists are coming from. There are links below to Primitive Baptist articles for further study should the reader want additional information on this aberrant Christian sect. And please note, no ill-will is intended towards anyone who is currently a Primitive Baptist. I just strongly disagree with their “no gospel means” doctrine and wish to point out from the Bible why I disagree. May God bless you as you seek to worship Him in Spirit and in Truth.

No Evangelists Allowed?

What I discovered was several things, namely that this group holds to a heretical doctrine regarding evangelism: they genuinely believe that there is no point to conventional evangelism – preaching to the lost as a “means” of salvation. They believe that salvation only involves the Holy Spirit without any assistance from preachers or evangelists or other persons preaching the word of God to effect salvation in unsaved sinners. They mistakenly believe that these two scripture passages:

“salvation is of the Lord” (Jonah 2:9) and

“not of works” (Eph 2:9) are saying that salvation does not even involve the efforts of an evangelist preaching the law of God to bring conviction of sin to the unregenerated.

What About James 1:18?

If the Primitive Baptists are correct in saying that God does not use preaching as a means to effect salvation, to bring about the new birth, then what are we to make of James 1:18 which says:

“Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.”

Isn’t this verse saying that God “begets” (gives birth to) sinners with the Gospel (i.e. the word of truth)? Regarding the phrase “with the word of truth”, the renowned theologian Bible commentator has written:

“not Christ, who is the Word, and truth itself; though regeneration is sometimes ascribed to him; and this act of begetting is done by the Father, through the resurrection of Christ from the dead; but the Gospel, which is the word of truth, and truth itself, and contains nothing but truth; and by this souls are begotten and born again; see ( Ephesians 1:13 ) ( 1 Peter 1:23 ) and hence ministers of it are accounted spiritual fathers.” [John Gill’s Exposition Of The Bible, RE: James 1:18]

And as referenced by Mr. Gill, Ephesians 1:13 and 1Peter 1:23 point out the following:

“In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise” – Eph 1:13

“For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God.” – 1Pet 1:23

What About John 6:68?

“Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.” – John 6:68

John 6:68 clearly points out the significance of the Word of God with regards to salvation (i.e. eternal life), else Peter should have said “You have eternal life”… There would have been no need to mention “the words of eternal life” in that scripture passage.

They confuse the forest for the trees

One trap that Primitive Baptists may be falling into is equating the “GOOD NEWS” of the Gospel as a means of salvation, with the entire message of the Gospel, which includes the “BAD NEWS” of the Gospel: judgment, wrath, sin, hell, God’s holiness, God’s Law, sinners=law-breakers and so on. God indeed uses these things as a schoolmaster to bring a person to Christ (Galatians 3:24). The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Psalm 111:10) and so the bad news of the Gospel is an essential element of the Gospel and an important tool used of God, by way of a preacher and the Holy Spirit, to convict and convert sinners. Certainly, a sinner cannot see his need for the Good News (i.e. a Savior for sin) if he is not shown WHY he needs that Savior, via the preaching of the Bad News. And true Christians will admit that any preaching will fall on deaf ears if the power of God is not behind those words.

Redefiners Of Theological Terminology

Determining that these folks were teaching heresy regarding evangelism took a while to figure out for a couple of reasons. I sort of fell into a trap, following a trail of crumbs they laid out before me that led me down the Primitive Baptist path of redefined words and reinterpreted scriptures… Yes, they look at words like regeneration and conversion differently than most Christians. And this causes them to interpret certain Bible verses differently than most Christians. So, what should have been obvious to me early on in my investigation, became obscured by my own tunnel vision as I followed that trail of Primitive Baptist crumbs.

They Miss The Two Types Of Preaching In The Bible

Primitive Baptists apparently MISS two important things when they read the Bible, perhaps because they have already adopted their own definitions of things and perhaps because they are missing the overall picture of what was going on in the . These two important things are the 2 distinctions in the types of preaching documented in the Bible, as being engaged in by the early Church…

Preaching type 1: The early church was evangelizing the unsaved, (unbelievers/unregenerated) as can see by the biblical accounts of Paul preaching at Mars Hill and in the synagogues, Peter preaching at Pentecost, and Stephen preaching to the Sanhedrin. In fact, it is beyond obvious that they were preoccupied with this mission.

Preaching type 2: The early church leaders were teaching the saints (believers/regenerated) through the letters to the churches (along with direct, in person teaching of course). And one of the primary things they were teaching was the need to evangelize the lost, by their example and by their epistles. And yes, the early church leaders also spent time teaching about the importance of godly (Christlike) living.

The Pattern In Scripture Of God’s Word Bringing Forth Life

Primitive Baptists must have ignored a whole lot of Bible verses to not have noticed the BIBLICAL PATTERN of the Word Of God being used as a MEANS God has employed in Creation, in bringing the physically dead to life and in imparting spiritual life.

1. God spoke the universe into existence, with His own voice (Genesis 1:3 – “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.”).

2. God used Ezekiel’s voice to bring life to a valley of dry bones (Ezekiel chapter 34:9 – “Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord God; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.”).

3. Jesus shouted “Lazarus come forth” to bring a dead man to back to life (John 11:43 – “And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.”).

4. Jesus commanded a lame man to “take up his bed and walk” and instantly the man got up and walked (Mark 2:9 – “Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?”).

5. Peter spoke and a girl arose from the dead (Acts 9:40 – “But Peter put them all forth, and kneeled down, and prayed; and turning him to the body said, Tabitha, arise. And she opened her eyes: and when she saw Peter, she sat up.”).

John 5:25 makes it pretty clear that the preaching of the Gospel really is the “means” God uses to effect salvation:

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live.”

“by “the voice” of Christ is intended his Gospel, which is a voice of love, grace, and mercy, of life and liberty, of peace, pardon, righteousness, and salvation by him; and which being attended with his power, is the means of quickening dead sinners” – John Gill’s Exposition Of The Bible, RE: John 5:25

They Become Focused On Their Uniqueness

And as much as Primitive Baptists may try to focus on Christ, what they end up doing is focusing on the uniqueness of their group, perhaps inadvertently, but never-the-less that’s how it looked to me as an outsider. I admire their desire to thoroughly examine Biblical issues. However, I believe Primitive Baptists have locked themselves into a compartment of doctrine with the words they have redefined and with the teachers and elders they put so much faith in, preventing them from any positive changes away from their erroneous soteriological doctrine.

Why Would A New Believer Be Concerned About The Lost?

Looking at my own change of heart upon regeneration, I can strongly testify, by way of the Spirit within me, that a genuine believer will have a burden to evangelize the lost. One must question their salvation if they do not have such a burden. Also, any doctrine that teaches and encourages Christians to not evangelize the lost (and to look for scriptural justification for that stance that involves redefining theological terms) is simply not of God and is of the evil one.

The Unique Primitive Baptist View Of The Words Regeneration & Conversion

The central point that shows the error of Primitive Baptist doctrine regarding salvation (“no gospel means” as they refer to it) is regarding the biblical patterns for the 2 types of preaching in the New Testament. Those patterns don’t go away, no matter how they define things. Whether they believe that regeneration is separate from conversion (which they do) or whether they believe in something they call “time salvation” or not. They believe in the idea that conversion takes place over time, gradually and can even take a lifetime. And so to them, conversion does not necessarily coincide with regeneration.

The Unique Primitive Baptist Concept Called “Time Salvation”

Primitive Baptists also believe that you can be saved and not know it until some time after regeneration, at some time down the road, at which someone explains salvation to you from the Bible. They call this “Time Salvation”. I guess they have not heard that the Scriptures are not of any private interpretation and yet they have this unique view of salvation – unique from the rest of biblical Christianity. Of course if you consider salvation to be a work of man, then, it could be looked at as something that takes place over a period of time, though Primitive Baptists don’t believe salvation is a work of man.

The New Testament Church Was Preoccupied With Evangelism

The very thing that Primitive Baptists don’t believe in is the very thing that the early Church was preoccupied with. Primitive Baptists apparently don’t seem to understand just how much the New Testament church was actively involved in preaching to the lost. They were as mission-minded as you can get. They supported Paul in his journeys. In addition, the Bible is chock full of examples of God sending messengers to preach to the unconverted. This is the way God does things historically. He sends His messengers out into the world to preach to the converted and unconverted a like. Just do a word search on the word “hearken” in the OT starting with Jeremiah and this fact becomes painfully obvious.

Trying To Make A Case Based Upon A False Premise

Primitive Baptists try to blend together the works of the lost sinner with the work of the ministry of the Gospel in an effort to build a case for not preaching to the lost. That blending is obvious in this Primitive Baptist article http://pbgrace.org/means.htm. But when you read that brief article, you can see that the author is presenting what is called a “straw man” argument… stating a false premise and then attacking it.

The false premise of the Primitive Baptists can be stated this way: Since “evangelism” is a “work” of man, and knowing that the Bible states that salvation is “not of works”, God therefore cannot use evangelism as a “means” of saving someone. Who, other than a Primitive Baptist, would ever jump to the conclusion that Ephesians 2:9 is referring to both the sinner being preached to and the person doing the preaching?

But “Not Of Works” Is NOT Referring To The Work Of An Evangelist

However, the problem with the above stated PB premise, is that verse 9 in Ephesians chapter 2: “Not of works lest any man should boast”, is only referring to the lost sinner, not to the evangelist. There are no biblical grounds for conflating the two parties (lost sinner and evangelist) as Primitive Baptists do in their effort to discount the need for evangelism – by their false claim that “not of works” also applies to the work of the evangelist in his preaching to the lost sinner.

Regarding evangelism, Paul said to Timothy:

“But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.” 2 Timothy 4:5

If Primitive Baptists were correct about “no gospel means” being needed or wanted by God for the saving of souls, then Paul’s statement in 2 Timothy 4:5 would make no sense. Timothy WAS experiencing afflictions because he WAS doing the work of an evangelist.

The rest of the Church (those outside the Primitive Baptist camp) who believe in the sovereignty of God in salvation, would never deny that the sinner is dead in sin and cannot possibly reach out to God for salvation, cannot choose Christ, cannot accept Jesus as their savior. But they would not deny that God uses “means” – sends His laborers – into the fields to participate in the harvest. God is not ashamed to use mere vessels of clay as his messengers and as his laborers in the fields. But Primitive Baptists seem to think He should be ashamed. They claim that not only is the free-will gospel robbing God of His glory but that the evangelist is robbing God of His glory.

I guess if Paul had had some Primitive Baptists to “straighten him out” by telling him to not bother preaching to the lost as a means of salvation, he could have saved himself a whole lot of trouble, which trouble he summarized in 2 Corinthians, chapter 11:

24 Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one.

25 Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep;

26 In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;

27 In weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness. (2 Cor 11).

Believers Evangelize For Rewards? Really?

The insinuation in that pbgrace.org article mentioned above, that Christians who don’t believe like Primitive Baptists, are just looking for rewards and crowns in heaven (as a result of their evangelism efforts), is what I would call a low blow. A true believer in Christ is interested in pleasing his Master, his Savior, his redeemer. He shares his faith and evangelizes the lost out of a genuine love of God and a genuine concern for those who are perishing. That does not mean that Christians’ motives for serving God are always entirely pure. Never-the-less, I personally believe that our reward in heaven, our crown, is the Lord Jesus Christ, who should be more than enough reward for any sinner saved by grace:

Genesis 15:1 – “After these things the word of the Lord came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward.”

Isaiah 28:5 – “In that day shall the Lord of hosts be for a crown of glory, and for a diadem of beauty, unto the residue of his people.”

Primitive Baptists’ Cult-Like Attributes

This very small, exclusive group of Christians who call themselves Primitive Baptists, seem to exhibit some characteristics of a Christian-like cult.

1. They have cult-like “gatekeepers” who guard the truth “as they see” it for their organization. These are a few individuals who write the stuff that everyone else is expected to subscribe to, like a creed or confession would have been used by protestant denominations of years gone by and similar to how the Jehovahs Witnesses use their Watchtower Society to print and promulgate Witnesses dogma. So Primitive Baptists have their teachers and spokespersons who write books and post teachings in online blogs and forums. Yes, it is true that many legitimate groups do this also.

2. They exhibit extreme exclusivity: They claim to be the ONLY group currently around that represents the truest and purest form of Christianity today, the most biblically accurate branch of the true Christian Church.

3. They claim to be able to trace their roots back to the first century church, a totally unverifiable claim that they never-the-less use, as a means of attempting to add validity to their group, a validity that no one can either prove or disprove… but the claim sure sounds impressive.

4. They have a unique view of certain passages of scripture that enables them to support their totally unorthodox doctrines.

Obvious "Gospel Means" Passages In Scripture

There are plenty of passages in the Bible that indicate rather clearly, that preaching the gospel is the “means” by which God uses His messengers to effect salvation in the sinners He intends to save – in conjunction with the work of the Holy Spirit of course.

Case study #1: Acts 14

Primitive Baptists say that there is no point in preaching the gospel to the unsaved, unregenerated, because God is going to save them by way of immediate Holy Spirit regeneration without any Gospel preaching (without any Gospel “means”). They believe that Christians should only preach to believers, those who need to be taught of God about the “Good News” of salvation through Jesus Christ and taught how to live the Christian life. PBs say that once Christians hear the “Good News” and understand it, they will then have become “converted”, even though they may have been regenerated a long time ago. Is this idea really biblical?

If, contrary to PB teaching, God really does use the preaching of the Gospel to actually convert sinners to Christ, then we ought to be able to find examples of that in Scripture. And indeed, that is the case as we see here in Acts 14:12-17 where Paul and Barnabas are preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ to people who they surely know are not yet saved or regenerated – people who just called Paul “Mars” and Barnabas “Mercurius”…

12 And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker. 13 Then the priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people. 14 Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out, 15 And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: 16 Who in times past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways. 17 Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness.

If the preaching of God’s word was not a “means” used by God to convert souls to Christ, would the apostle Paul have bothered to say: “We … preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God”?

Clearly Paul understood that his preaching to the lost was not in vain (1 Corinthians 15:58). And clearly he understood the proper meaning behind this passage in Ezekiel 37:4…

“Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the Lord.” – Ezekiel 37:4

With God all things are possible… If dead dry bones can hear the word of the Lord, then surely a spiritually dead sinner can also – if the Lord wills it.

“So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” – Isaiah 55:11

Case study #2: 1Thes 2:16

In 1 Thessalonians 2 we see a strange statement of the apostle Paul, if in fact Primitive Baptists are correct in saying that God does not use the “means” of gospel preaching to SAVE sinners:

14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: 16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Was Paul unaware of something that only Primitive Baptists happen to be aware of regarding salvation? Why would Paul say what he said in verse 16 above if God was not using Paul’s preaching to bring about the salvation of souls? Of course the Holy Spirit would have to be involved in the conviction and regeneration of these souls. No one is denying that. But to say that preaching is not a part of the process is to deny the Word of God.

Additional passages related to evangelistic gospel preaching

“Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man’s foundation” – Rom 15:20

“For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.” – 1 Cor 1:21

“To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” – 1 Cor 9:22

“I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. … For we are labourers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building.” – 1 Cor 3:6&9

How Did Primitive Baptists End Up With Their Unbiblical Ideas?

As convincing as Primitive Baptists can be, I could find no solid evidence that traces their beliefs back to the early church as they claim, nor do I think that they can convincingly deny that the beliefs they have, simply originated with a certain group of Baptists who splintered off from the “” in the 1800s. And then, over the years, their group developed this anti- missionary and anti-evangelism theology with corresponding new word definitions regarding the gospel, to suit their original position against missionary societies. And now that so much time has passed, they no longer realize the occurrence of that transition themselves, that such a theological metamorphosis has taken place in their denomination.

I personally have not found the Primitive Baptist brand of Christianity showing up in the preaching and teaching of men of God who are I’ve grown to trust and whom so many other Christians have grown to trust over the centuries. That observation of mine in and of itself is not a “rock solid” case against the Primitive Baptist “no gospel means” doctrine. But it is noteworthy when taken into consideration with the points I mentioned above about the two types of New Testament preaching and teaching. Some PBs will say “Well what about John Gill? He shared our views regarding “no gospel means” in salvation.”. To that all I can say is that John Gill seems to be on both sides of the fence. Some of his commentary seems to lean on the Primitive Baptist “no gospel means” side and some commentary seems to lean more towards the traditional, historical, orthodox “gospel means” side.

Primitive Baptists are in a very narrow camp, dangerously narrow. Which is a mark that other groups have, groups who claim to be the exclusive purveyors of the truth. Granted, narrowness does not necessarily negate the possibility of truth. But, it is a pretty common characteristic of a cult or unbiblical Christian sect.

Believe me, I have had to sort out many unusual ideas and doctrines since God saved me 31 years ago. Like with many cults and unorthodox sects, a lot of what Primitive Baptists teach seems to make a lot of sense and sounds biblical, and on many points even is biblical, especially regarding the sovereignty of God in salvation. But then there is a little bit of leaven that leavens the whole lump. Meaning something snuck in there that does not belong, and so certain words had to be re-defined to accommodate the unorthodox and unbiblical beliefs that are being promulgated by Primitive Baptists.

To see things the Primitive Baptist way, you have to put on a certain special pair of “glasses” … you have to use “the Primitive Baptist dictionary” if you will, before their views make sense. And for me personally, I would have to throw away the heart of God that I’ve had for the 31 years since my new birth… a heart for lost souls to come to Christ, a burden to warn the lost to flee the wrath of God. The very thing representing the greatest change in me since my conversion (and I us the word ‘conversion’ in the traditional sense, not the Primitive Baptist sense), is the thing that Primitive Baptists say we should not even be doing, sharing God’s Word that souls might be saved…. sharing God’s Word that the Lord of the harvest might see fit to convict and convert the Elect among those being preached to – that the Spirit of the living God would “give ears to hear” to some in the field where the Word is being sown. Just as God used Noah to bring salvation from the Flood to that small elect group of eight individuals, so God uses mere mortals to bring salvation to a lost and dying world.

Sometimes we are so busy “selling” something for so long that we don’t even realize that what we are selling does not have the “features” that we think it has. We get to the point where we just repeat a script and stop thinking critically about some foundational points that would undermine our sales pitch. Also, we can get into trouble theologically if we avoid – and look down on – the creeds and confessions that were put in place to guard against the kind of error that the Primitive Baptists have developed. Similarly, in conjunction with a distain for the “old paths”, we can get off track theologically if we trust the views and interpretations of any one particular man, in our local church, in our denomination, or anywhere. I personally believe that ignorance of the respected creeds of historical Christianity (The 1689 London Baptist Confession & Westminster Confession for example) is a major reason why the false “free-will” gospel is so prevalent today.

Conclusion

If Primitive Baptists are wrong on gospel “means”, which I believe they are, then there is no other conclusion that they have a doctrine that is the one doctrine that the Devil himself wishes all Christians would have, a doctrine that tells them they should not be doing the very thing that God commands them to do to:

bring salvation to lost souls

The Bible is replete with examples of God using weak, sinful, fallible mortals to accomplish His purposes here on earth. We dare not think we have a “higher” view of God, that does not require God Himself to use such broken tools, such broken vessels of clay as those He has adopted into His family.

It does not seem to matter to Primitive Baptists that their founders came up with their unique views “out of nowhere” after more than 1800 years of church history. The way I see it, some person or group simply wanted to justify their case against missions and/or mission societies back in the 1800s and so they came up with an unorthodox view of regeneration and conversion to accomplish their “mission”, no pun intended. After repeating their fabricated story often enough and long enough, and embellishing that story as time went on, they came up with what they consider to be a lock-tight case for no gospel means. And they now point to errors in theology of modern day Reformed churches, as if those errors somehow validate the PB “no gospel means” doctrine. — RM Kane

It is interesting to note that the 1800s was a time in the history of America when a number of significant abberant offshoots of Christianity were born: Mormonism – Founded by Joseph Smith in Western New York in the 1820s. Jehovah’s Witnesses – Founded in the late 1870s by Charles Taze Russell as “Zion’s Watch Tower Tract Society”. Seventh Day Adventists – Founded in 1863 by William Miller with additional doctrine coming later on from Ellen G White. Primitive Baptists – Founded around the time of the Kehukee Association Declaration of 1827.

Additional information about Primitive Baptists and their heresy: Online Book About Hardshell Baptists by Stephen Garrett BaptistGadfly Blog Old Baptist – Where the real primitive or old Baptist faith is defended Responding to Hardshell Comments History and Heresies of Hardshell Baptists Why We Are Not Primitive Baptists The Killing Effects of Hyper- by Bob Ross Spurgeon versus Hyperism by Bob L. Ross & Ian D. Elsasser Cultic Hyper-Calvinistic Doctrines of the Primitive Baptist Church Part #1 Cultic Hyper-Calvinistic Doctrines of the Primitive Baptist Church Part #2 Who Or What Are Primitive Baptists?

Primitive Baptists are a Christian sect (as in denomination) that believe they can trace their “roots” back to the first century New Testament Church. They believe in election and predestination but they refuse to call themselves Calvinists because they feel that it identifies them with John Calvin and his doctrine, including things Calvin preached that they do not agree with. They have beliefs in agreement with many protestants of our day and from the past, including from the Protestant Reformation period. However, they don’t want to be called Protestants because they don’t want people to think that their group originated during that time period but rather during the foundational period of the Christian Church. Primitive Baptist congregations don’t all agree with each other exactly the same way on all things but on most things. They are against using musical instruments in Church, which means they sing all songs “a-capella”. They also tend to just sing the Psalms, and not any other music such as , old-time gospel music or contemporary . So you could honestly say that they are extremely conservative in their views and in practice.

The most distinguishing teaching of Primitive Baptists is this:

They have a teaching that they refer to as “No Gospel Means” which is the idea that only the Holy Spirit saves souls, without the use of preachers or preaching. How they account for a person becoming saved by a convicting sermon or by a gospel tract, I cannot say. They do not believe in sending out , the primary reason being that they don’t believe that preaching is used of God to save souls. Check out our study “Primitive Baptists – True Hyper-Calvinists” for more information on this heresy.

For more information on Primitive Baptists:

Some Questions And Answers About Primitive Baptists

What Primitive Baptists Believe

What do Primitive Baptists Believe by Elder Charles Taylor

Progressive Primitive Baptists

Ten Reasons Primitive Baptists Are Not Calvinists

Why We Are Not Primitive Baptists

PrimitiveBaptist.net

Why do Primitive Baptists not use man made Musical Instruments?

Why Do Primitive Baptists Rebaptize?

Famous Calvinists Of The Past & Present

Introduction

In this article we have catalogued the names of many famous Calvinists – Christians who believed and taught the five points of Calvinism, abbreviated as T.U.L.I.P. and also known as “The Doctrines Of Grace”. One important point we wish to make in this article is that all these godly and scholarly Bible teachers believed that what is known today as Calvinism, was and is in fact the true Gospel, the true teachings of the Bible regarding election, predestination and the sovereignty of God in salvation. And their views on these doctrines were the accepted views of what was considered “orthodox” – as compared to “unorthodox” or heretical – teaching regarding salvation. It is only in the past 150 years or so, and most predominently in the past 50 to 100 years, that the opposing view (, also known as the “Free-Will” gospel) has spread like wildfire in the churches to the point where Calvinism is now considered heresy by many professing Christian teachers and preachers. It was Arminianism and the free-will gospel that was once called heresy and labeled such at the Synod of Dort back in 1618. Things have greatly changed in the Church in 400 years.

T – U – L – I – P (The 5 Points Of Calvinism) Summarized T stands for Total Depravity U stands for Unconditional Election L stands for Limited Atonement (also known as Particular Redemption) I stands for Irresistable Grace P stands for Perseverance Of the Saints (also known as Preservation Of The Saints)

Please check out our material on Predestination & Free Will for some extremely insightful articles and Bible studies on these intriguing and controversial subjects.

Famous Calvinists Of The Past: Arthur W. Pink: 1886-1952 (Bible teacher, theologian and author) Augustus Toplady: 1740-1778 (author of “Rock Of Ages” and other hymns) B. B. Warfield: 1851–1921 (principal of the Princeton Theological Seminary) Benjamin Keach: 1640-1704 (primary author of the 1689 Baptist Confession) B.H. Carroll: 1843-1914 (founder South Western Theological Seminary) Charles Hodge: 1797–1878 (Presbyterian theologian and principal of Princeton Theological Seminary) Charles Spurgeon: 1834-1892 (famous Baptist preacher in England) Cornelius Van Til: 1895–1987 (Christian philosopher and Reformed theologian at Westminster Theological Seminary) Francis Schaeffer: 1912-1984 (author of “How Shall We Then Live” video series) George Mueller: 1805-1898 (Christian evangelist and orphanage director) George Whitefield:1714-1770 (evangelist, preacher and one of the founders of Methodism) Isaac Watts: 1674–1748 ( writer, theologian, pastor) J.C. Ryle: 1816-1900 (writer, pastor, evangelical preacher) J.P. Boyce: 1827-1888 (founder Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) John Bunyan: 1628-1688 (author of Pilgrim’s Progress) John Calvin: 1509-1564 (preacher & Bible scholar) John Gresham Machen: 1881–1937 (American Presbyterian theologian at Princeton Seminary, founded the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, founded Westminster Theological Seminary) John L. Dagg: 1794-1884 (Baptist theologian) John Foxe: 1516-1587 (author of Foxe’s Book Of Martyrs) John Gill: 1697-1771 (renowned theologian and Bible commentary author) John Knox: 1513-1572 (founder of ) John Newton: 1725-1807 (wrote the hymn “”) John Owen: 1616-1683 (theologian and author) Jonathan Edwards: 1703-1758 (evangelist, preacher, author of “Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God”) Martyn Lloyd-Jones: 1834-1892 (pastor and theologian) Martin Luther: 1483-1546 (Protestant Reformer) Matthew Henry: 1662-1712 (famous Bible commentary author) Roger Williams: 1603-1683 (founded the first Baptist church in America) Ulrich Zwingli: 1484–1531 (a leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland) William Carey: 1761-1834 (missionary to India) William Wilberforce: 1759-1833 (slavery abolitionist in England) Zacharias Ursinus: 1534–1583 (Reformed theologian in Germany) Click HERE to see our list of quotes by famous Calvinist preachers and teachers.

Contemporary Famous Calvinists: D.A. Carson D. James Kennedy J.I. Packer James Montgomery Boice James White John F. MacArthur John Piper Joshua Harris Loraine Boettner Albert Mohler R.C. Sproul Steve Lawson Voddie Bachham Wayne Grudem

People Guilty Of Greatly Spreading The False “Free Will” Gospel: Bill Bright Billy Graham Charles Finney Dwight L. Moody Chuck Colson Chuck Smith Dave Hunt David Cloud your pastor[1] [1] – most preachers nowadays preach free-willism

VIDEO: Calvinism Is The Gospel by Jerry Johnson

Additional notes about Calvinism: What Is Neo-Calvinism? Neo-Calvinism is a form of Calvinism initiated by the Dutch theologian Abraham Kuyper. What Is New-Calvinism? New Calvinism is not so much a belief as it is a movement. New Calvinists believe in the five points of Calvinism. It is just that they are also accepting of things that many Calvinists have not historically embraced and that includes the “sign gifts”, such as speaking in tongues. For example, there is a group called “Sovereign Grace Ministries” that falls into this category. New Calvinists tend NOT to adhere as strictly to the Three Forms of Unity and other Reformed confessions of faith as do traditional Calvinists. What Is Hyper-Calvinism? While there are various opinions on what constitutes Hyper-Calvinism, most calvinists would define the term hyper-calvinism to mean the belief that there is no need to preach to anyone in order for a person to be saved by God and that salvation is entirely an act of God, even apart from a preacher. However this belief is erroneous in light of Romans 10:14 and other Bible passages. See our article about Primitive Baptists – True Hyper-Calvinists for a more in- depth discussion of hyper-calvinism and why it is most definitely unbiblical.

Is True Biblical Salvation Synergistic Or Monergistic? The true Gospel of salvation in Jesus Christ is monergistic. As scripture says in Jonah 2:9 “Salvation is of the Lord”. True salvation does not require the spiritually dead sinner to do anything. God regenerates without the sinner’s cooperation or acceptance or participation of any kind whatsoever. This type of salvation is “one-way” (where only one party – God – is at work) therefore it is referred to as monergistic, with God being the AUTHOR and FINISHER of our faith. This view is in stark contrast to a two-way salvation (God doing His part and man supposedly doing his part), which is a synergistic – and unbiblical though very popular – view. If a person ever truly comes to God, the God of the bible, it is because GOD has already taken out their heart of stone and given them a heart of flesh (Ezekiel 36:26-27).

Related Material On Calvinism, Election, Predestination & Free-Will: Video: Does God Love Everyone? by Robert Morey Video: Short Sermon On Election by John MacArthur Monergism Vs. Synergism — Which View Is Correct? Ages Software’s Reformed books on CD-ROM Answers to Arminian Arguments Arthur Pink’s book “The Sovereignty Of God” on-line Other articles by Arthur Pink Arthur Pink Collection Doctrines of Grace Categorized Scripture List Greg Elmquist’s articles on election and predestination John Gill (a biography) Doctrines Of Grace Overview At BannerOfTruth.org Loraine Boettner articles on Calvinism, election, etc.” Various great authors of reformed theology

Introduction To Protestantism

“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” [Ephesians 2:8-9]

Famous Leaders Of The Protestant Reformation

Introduction

It may appear to Catholics that Protestants don’t agree on anything and can’t be part of the true “Church” of Jesus Christ since they have formed so many denominations. However, this Catholic view of Protestantism is a gross misrepresentation as there is much important, fundamental commonality among Protestant denominations and local Protestant churches.

Areas Of Protestant Agreement

Protestants of all denominations agree on many vital points of doctrine such as: the virgin birth of Christ the deity of Christ the trinitarian nature of God the belief that salvation is possible apart from the church of Rome forgiveness of sins does not require a human priest water baptism does not wash away sins the Bible can be interpreted and understood without a system of priests the Catechism of the Catholic church has many doctrinal errors in it there is no such place as Purgatory, the dead go to either heaven or hell the bread in a communion ceremony is just bread. It symbolizes Christ’s body. It does not become His body. If anything, the corporate Church (all true believers) on earth and in heaven is His body, so a person becomes a part of His body when they become born-again. Disagreement Among Protestants On The Gospel

Unfortunately, not all Protestants agree on what the true gospel of salvation is. In fact, many Protestant denominations believe in a false “free-will” gospel that is no gospel at all and is actually a false doctrine called Arminianism.

Synod Of Dort – Church Council Convened To The Address Arminian Heresy

This disagreement on the Gospel has been going on for centuries and it has been hotly contested at time, including at the Synod of Dort.

The Five Solas or Five Pillars Of The Protestant Reformation

Five major tenets of the Protestant Reformation that have been labeled as the “5 Solas” or “5 Pillars” of that reformation are listed here: 1. Sola Scriptura – “Scripture Alone” – The Bible alone is our highest authority. 2. Sola Fide – “Faith Alone” – We are saved through faith alone in Jesus Christ. 3. Sola Gratia – “Grace Alone” – We are saved by the grace of God alone. 4. Solus Christus – “Christ Alone” – Jesus Christ alone is our Lord, Savior, and King. 5. Soli Deo Gloria – “To The Glory Of God Alone” – We live for the glory of God alone. These five solas were formulated to point out the Biblical doctrines that the reformers were identifying as major distinctions between their beliefs, their teachings, IN CONTRAST TO the many unscriptural Roman Catholic Church’s teachings.

Martin Luther’s 95 Theses

Martin Luther who started out his religious life as a Catholic monk, wore out his welcome in the Catholic church when he started questioning and confronting some of their teachings and practices, as he came to see that those Catholic doctrines and traditions were at odds with the Bible. He had wanted to bring “reform” (what he felt was positive and necessary change) to the Catholic Church but was met with strong opposition from Catholic leadership, especially when he started speaking out against abusive practices of the Catholic church that involved robbing the poor by taking advantage of their fears regarding the fate of their deceased loved ones. In 1517, Luther greatly fueled that opposition to his proposed reforms, when he wrote up a list of 95 errors (which could also be termed grievances or or points of dispute) in practice and in doctrine – primarily related to the practice of indulgences (charging people to have a priest get their loved ones out of an imaginary place called Purgatory). Luther nailed that list to the door of a Church in Wittenburg, Germany. At that time, Luther was a professor of moral theology at the University of Wittenberg. That list of errors came to be know as Luther’s “Ninety Five Theses“, also known as his “Disputation on the Power of Indulgences”.

For a complete list of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses, click HERE.

Bibles That Helped Spread The Protestant Reformation

As more and more Bibles were being published in the ordinary language of the people, the Protestant Reformation spread along with the true Gospel of salvation by grace alone through Christ alone. No longer did the corrupt and repressive Roman Catholic Church have a captive audience, nor were they any longer able to keep the sacred Scriptures from the common man.

The Tyndale English Bible Translation

A major accomplishment of the Protestant Reformation was the publishing of the Bible in the vernacular (the common language of the people). In England, this milestone was met when William Tyndale translated and published the Bible in English in 15??. For his magnificent work, the Catholic Church executed him by strangling and then burned his body at the stake.

The Wycliff Bible Translation

The Wycliff Bible was an English translation attributed to the Bible translator John Wycliff, although it is now believed that parts of it were the work of others also.

The Geneva Bible Translation

The Geneva Bible, first published in 1560, is an English translation that was in wide use for many years. It was extremely popular, because it was perhaps the first mass produced English study Bible. It included footnotes, cross references and even maps and introductions to each book of the Bible.

The King James Bible Translation

The most famous and most published English Bible translation of all time is the King James Version (KJV), also known as the “Authorized Version” (AV). The KJV was first published in 1611 in England at the request of King James.

Major Bible Controversies & Issues

The best way to undermine the true Christian faith is to attack is most important foundation – the Scriptures. In the sections below we will be looking into the many ways that this has been happening over the years since the beginning of the Protestant Reformation.

The King James Only Controversy

Translation Versus Transliteration

Paraphrased Bible Versions

Modern Bible Versions Based Upon Corrupt Greek Manuscripts

Heretical New Age & Politically Correct Bible Versions

SEE ALSO: Famous Calvinists Quotes Of Famous Puritans & Calvinists

Christian Martyrs OF The Protestant Reformation

Foxes Book Of Martyrs

Martyrs Mirror

Why Are There So Many Protestant Denominations?

There are many reasons why there are so many Christian churches. We will look at several of those reasons here.

I. Things that differentiate true Christian churches: 1. Different methods of interpreting the Bible (sola scriptural, historical, etc.) (1Cor 2:13)

2. Different interpretations of doctrine (2Pet 1:20)

3. Different views on the importance of biblical doctrine versus extra-biblical tradition (2Thes 2:15, 2Thes 3:6)

4. Different styles of worship service (1Cor 11:1-2)

5. Different racial, age, economic, cultural and ethnic backgrounds (Gal 3:28)

6. Different personalities of church leaders (1Cor 1:12-13) II. Some major doctrinal differences that separate churches from each other: 1. Opinions of what the Gospel is (i.e. Some have a false free-will gospel. Some have the true Gospel of salvation by grace alone.)

2. Views about the nature of God (Some correctly believe that God is Sovereign and He alone chooses individuals for salvation based solely upon whom Christ suffered and died for at Calvary. Some wrongly believe God loves everybody and He wants to save everybody but He is unable to do so because it is up to the sinner to accept Christ and so they believe that the sinner’s choice gets him or her saved.)

3. Methods of water Baptism (sprinkling, pouring, total immersion)

4. Views on eternal security (assurance of salvation – can you lose your salvation?)

5. Interpretations of the gifts of the Spirit (‘sign’ gifts such as speaking in tongues, miraculous healings, prophecy)

6. The importance of traditions (both biblical and extra-biblical)

7. End-time prophecy (rapture timing, millennialism, etc.)

8. Right doctrine but wrong practice (not practicing what they are preaching)

9. Structure of leadership (multiple-elder run, pastor run, congregation run)

10. Format of church meetings (highly structured, run by a select few, very informal, everyone participates)

11. The condition of man and the doctrines of Grace (i.e. Does man have a ‘free’ will?, Did Christ die for everyone?, Is man totally depraved?, Can man resist God and His grace?)

12. Bible versions and views on the preservation and inerrancy of God’s word

13. Views on who can receive communion (members only, etc.)

14. Views on the role of women in the church (with respect to authority over men) III. Why then do true Christian churches differ?

OR IN OTHER WORDS…

Why do churches have different interpretations/views of various doctrines?

1. They are out of balance

There is an overemphasis and/or under-emphasis on some belief or practice, for example: overemphasis on some spiritual gift – such as teaching or giving (1Cor 12:27-31) overemphasis on unity – at the expense of truth and integrity (Gal 4:16, 1Thes 5:21) underemphasis on evangelism (Rom 10:14-15) underemphasis on fellowship (John 13:35) overemphasis on fellowship with an underemphasis on teaching the Word (1Pet 3:15) overemphasis on church discipline with an underemphasis on forgiveness and restoration (Gal 6:1) underemphasis on church discipline with an overemphasis on forgiveness and restoration (Rom 6:1) PLEASE NOTE: These examples are not meant to cover ALL areas that can be out of balance in a church.

Matt 23:23 – “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.”

Luke 11:42 – “But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.”

2. They are legalistic

There is an overemphasis on the outward appearance and an under-emphasis on the inward condition of the heart. This results in the truth being distorted by misapplying scripture. In extreme cases, people can be led to think that their salvation depends on their adherence to legalistic practices promoted by their church. Legalism often results when believers have a preoccupation with any of the following kinds of issues: style of dress, hair (even when people are already dressing modesty and tastefully) mode of baptism type of bread used in communion things where there is no scriptural prohibition against nor any endorsement in favor of – either directly or implied preoccupied with outward appearances rather than the condition of the heart

Often the side effect, if not the cause, of legalism is that secret sins or certain classes of sins tend to be ignored or swept under the carpet. Leaders may preach against minor things that most members agree with and avoid preaching about sins that would get them in trouble with the congregation.

Col 2:8 – “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.”

Col 2:16-18 – “16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. 18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,”

1 Sam 16:7 – “But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.”

Matt 23:5-7 – “But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, 6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, 7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.”

3. They are following the teachings of men instead of searching the scriptures for themselves:

Many churches strictly follow church bylaws or denominational creeds. Those documents are what usually defines their church. And for various reasons they never alter their teaching from those “official” documents, even if they learn that there may an error or two in those documents. The leaders of those churches would probably be out of a job if they taught different doctrine from that which is spelled out in the creeds and bylaws.

4. They are following men and trusting men’s teaching more than they should

Many church leaders fall into the trap that all of us can fall into: they trust famous teachers and preachers too much, be it “church fathers” or the Reformers or seminar professors or famous/popular Christian authors or whomever. Many church members fall into the trap of assuming their church leaders are correct because of their status in the local church (i.e. they are teachers and were probably formally trained somewhere). A very subtle practice that leads people to trust men so much is the use of titles for these men.

Today’s titles that are equivalent to ‘Rabbi’:

Reverend, Pastor, Father (in Catholicism) or any title that sets a man apart. Even the word ‘elder’ when used as a title.

What titles can do: elevate men (and women) segregate people into groups – the supposed educated (the clergy) and the supposedly ignorant (the laity) hinder honesty and openness discourage correction of those who are thought to be in an elite or untouchable class (see John 3:30, Mark 9:35, Mark 10:44)

Titles all believers have: 1. priests

2. kings

3. Christians

4. saints

5. brethren

6. ministers

7. ambassadors

8. servants We are all one in Christ (see Gal 3:28, 1Cor 3:4-5)

2Cor 10:12 – “For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.”

(See also Mark 7:1-13)

5. They have the wrong interpretation of scripture

This actually covers items 1 & 2 which are tied to the method used to interpret scripture. Many different views on biblical doctrine would disappear if believers were rightly dividing the Word of Truth instead of basing their beliefs and practices on church tradition, denominational creeds, experiences, etc.

Themes relating to God’s Word: What do we get from God’s Word: 2 Tim 2:15, 3:16-17

How do we get truth from God’s Word: Psa 119:99

Diligence in searching the Word for truth: Acts 17:11, Jer 29:13, Heb 11:6, Psa 119:2,

Warnings against adding to God’s Word: Deut 4:2, Rev 22:18-19

Permanence of God’s Word: Matt 5:18, Matt 24:35, Luke 16:17, 1Pet 1:24-25 6. They do church in such a way that prevents believers in the “corporate Church” from arriving at the same conclusions about doctrine

When you do church in an environment that only lets the “official” teachers do the teaching, and where you do your best to adhere to “official” church documents or denominational creeds, the possibility for correcting doctrinal error is very small. Here are a couple of related articles on this subject that you are strongly encouraged to investigate: The Clergy System

Biblical Patterns For The Local Church IV. Differences that don’t matter: personal preferences – like style of worship or personality issues.

Rom 14:1-6 – “1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. 2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. 3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him. 4 Who art thou that judgest another man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. 5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. 6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.”

V. Differences that enrich the total body of Christ: racial, age, male/female, economic, personality, occupational, marital status, cultural and ethnic differences

(see 1Cor 12:4-6,28 – keyword: diversities) 1Cor 12:4-6 – “4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.” Ver. 5 (Gill): And there are differences of administrations, &c.] Or ministries; offices in the church, ministered in by different persons, as apostles, prophets, pastors, or teachers and deacons; who were employed in planting and forming of churches, ordaining elders, preaching the word, administering ordinances, and taking care of the poor; for which different gifts were bestowed on them, they not all having the same office.

Ver. 6 (Gill): And there are diversities of operations, There are some that are ordinary, as the good work of grace, and the several parts of it, the work of faith, the labour of love, and patience of hope, which the Spirit of God begins, carries on, and finishes in all the elect of God, and members of Christ; and there are others which are extraordinary, and are here meant, and hereafter specified.

1Cor 12:28 – “And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.”

VI. What unites the true Christian churches?

Regardless of all the differences between denominations and individual believers, there are some basic things that unite all true believers: 1. First and foremost: the Holy Spirit who dwells in all true believers (see Rom 8:16, Eph 4:4-6, Eph 4:30)

2. The correct understanding of who Jesus Christ is (see Matt 16:16, John 1:1, John 8:58, 2Tim 1:12, Eph 4:4-6)

3. Understanding that salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone (see Eph 2:8-9, Titus 3:5, John 14:6) VII. Food for thought: 1. Can we ever fully understand everything in the Bible? (see Isa 55:9, 1Cor 13:12)

2. Can we at least reach correct conclusions about major doctrinal differences? as a whole? as individuals? (see 2 Tim 3:14-17)

3. Should we be satisfied with the opinion of our teachers and pastors or our denomination’s “official” viewpoint if we have not done a thorough study ourselves? (see Acts 17:11)

4. Is a church a true Christian church if they do not believe that the Bible is the final authority for a Christian?

5. Can a church be a true Christian church if they do not believe that the Bible is the literal and inerrant Word of God?

6. With so many Bible versions available today, how do we know which Bible is the Word of God (versus Bibles that may ‘contain’ the Word of God)?