DOCSLIB.ORG

Ster Plan Issouri River, South Dakota Pdate of Design Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ster Plan Issouri River, South Dakota Pdate of Design Memorandum U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Missouri River, South Dakota Update of Design Memorandum MB-90 October 2003 This page intentionally left blank. Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Update October 2003 Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Missouri River, South Dakota Update of Design Memorandum MB-90 October 2003 i Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Update October 2003 This page intentionally left blank. ii Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Update October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS PERTINENT DATA ...................................................................................................................................................... XI CORPS OF ENGINEERS REPORTS...........................................................................................................................XV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................... XXI 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION ....................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3. PROJECT PURPOSES..................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.1. Flood Control............................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.2. Navigation.................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.3. Hydropower ................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3.4. Fish and Wildlife.......................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.5. Recreation .................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.6. Irrigation ...................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.7. Municipal and Industrial Water Supply ....................................................................................... 1-7 1.4. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE MASTER PLAN ...................................................................... 1-7 1.4.1. Purpose......................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4.2. Scope............................................................................................................................................ 1-8 1.5. PROJECT-WIDE RESOURCE OBJECTIVES ............................................................................. 1-11 2. FACTORS INFLUENCING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ..................................... 2-1 2.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE RESERVOIR .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2. LAKE OPERATION........................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.2.1. Statistical Analysis........................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3. HYDROLOGY AND GROUNDWATER ..................................................................................... 2-11 2.3.1. Hydrology .................................................................................................................................. 2-11 2.3.2. Groundwater .............................................................................................................................. 2-13 2.4. ICE AFFECTED FLOWS.............................................................................................................. 2-13 2.5. SEDIMENTATION ....................................................................................................................... 2-14 2.5.1. Sediment Deposition.................................................................................................................. 2-15 2.5.2. Littoral Drift............................................................................................................................... 2-16 2.5.3. Shoreline Erosion....................................................................................................................... 2-17 2.6. SURFACE WATER QUALITY................................................................................................... 2-20 2.6.1. Federal Clean Water Act............................................................................................................. 2-20 2.6.2. Corps Water Quality Management Program............................................................................... 2-21 2.6.3. Data Collection ........................................................................................................................... 2-21 2.6.4. Water Quality.............................................................................................................................. 2-22 2.7. FUTURE ACTIONS – MONITORING WATER QUALITY AT BIG BEND............................. 2-23 iii Big Bend Dam/Lake Sharpe Master Plan Update October 2003 2.7.1. Water Quality Monitoring Goals and Objectives....................................................................... 2-23 2.7.2. Data Collection Approach.......................................................................................................... 2-24 2.7.3. Parameters to be Measured and Analyzed ................................................................................. 2-26 2.8. ACCESSIBILITY........................................................................................................................... 2-28 2.8.1. Road Access............................................................................................................................... 2-28 2.8.2. Rail Access................................................................................................................................. 2-28 2.8.3. Air Access.................................................................................................................................. 2-29 2.8.4. Lake Navigation......................................................................................................................... 2-29 2.9. CLIMATE ...................................................................................................................................... 2-29 2.9.1. Temperature and Humidity ........................................................................................................ 2-30 2.9.2. Precipitation and Evaporation.................................................................................................... 2-31 2.9.3. Wind........................................................................................................................................... 2-33 2.10. TOPOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND SOILS ................................................................................. 2-34 2.10.1. Topography................................................................................................................................ 2-34 2.10.2. Geology...................................................................................................................................... 2-36 2.10.3. Soils ........................................................................................................................................... 2-37 2.11. LAND USE .................................................................................................................................... 2-40 2.12. BORROW AREAS AND UTILITIES ........................................................................................... 2-40 2.13. VEGETATION RESOURCES....................................................................................................... 2-41 2.13.1. Bottomland Woodlands.............................................................................................................. 2-42 2.13.2. Woodland Draws ....................................................................................................................... 2-43 2.13.3. Shrublands.................................................................................................................................. 2-44 2.13.4. Woody Plantings........................................................................................................................ 2-44 2.14. FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.......................................................................................... 2-47 2.14.1. Aquatic Food Base..................................................................................................................... 2-47 2.14.2. Fisheries..................................................................................................................................... 2-48 2.14.3. Aquatic Birds ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Law 87-735-Oct
    704 PUBLIC LAW 87-735-OCT. 3, 1962 [76 STAT. Public Law 87-735 Octobers, 1962 AN ACT [H. R. 5165] To provide for the acquisition of and the payment for individual Indian and tribal lands of the Crow Creek Sioux Reservation in South Dakota, required by the United States for the Big Bend Dam and Reservoir project on the Missouri River, and for the rehabilitation, social, and economic development of the members of the tribe, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and Home of Representatives of the Crow Creek United States of America in Congress assemhled, That in furtherance noT^^D^^ of the Big Bend Dam and Reservoir project authorized by the Flood Land acquisition Control Act of December 22,1944 (58 Stat. 887, 891)— foanrd BiReservoig Bend rDa m (a) The entire interest, including gravel but excluding the interest project. in oil, gas, and all other minerals of any nature whatsoever, in approxi­ 33 use 701-1 mately 6,283.57 acres of land within the taking area described in this et seq. Act in the Crow Creek Sioux Reservation in South Dakota, in which the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe or individual Indians have a trust or restricted interest, and any interest the tribe or Indians may have within the bed of the Missouri River so far as it is within the bound­ aries of the reservation are hereby taken by the United States for the Big Bend E>am and Reservoir project on the Missouri River, and in consideration thereof and for 132.61 acres of trust or restricted lands heretofore acquired by the United States in condemnation pro­ ceedings
    [Show full text]
  • Frozen Lake Sharpe, South Dakota 14 January 2014, by William L
    Image: Frozen Lake Sharpe, South Dakota 14 January 2014, by William L. Stefanov The distance across the narrow neck of land (image lower right) associated with this meander is approximately 1 kilometer (0.62 miles). However, the river flow is controlled by the Big Bend Dam downstream, so the natural process of meander cutoff has been significantly slowed. Snow cover also highlights circular agricultural fields on the small peninsula within the meander bend. This type of field indicates center-pivot irrigation, where water is distributed from a central point radially outwards using sprinklers to cover the field area. Crops grown here include corn and soybeans, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's CropScape database. Astronaut photograph ISS038-E-23651 was Image Credit: NASA acquired on Dec. 26, 2013, with a Nikon D3X digital camera using a 1000 millimeter lens, and is provided by the ISS Crew Earth Observations experiment and Image Science & Analysis The Missouri River rises in the Rocky Mountains of Laboratory, Johnson Space Center. The image was western Montana, and flows generally to the taken by the Expedition 38 crew. It has been southeast for 3,767 kilometers (2,341 miles) to its cropped and enhanced to improve contrast, and confluence with the Mississippi River north of St. lens artifacts have been removed. Louis, Missouri. It is the longest river in North America. The river does not follow a straight southeasterly course along this distance, but Provided by NASA includes many meander bends such as the one in this astronaut photograph from the International Space Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding the Missouri Valley the Politics of Dam Site Selection and Design
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Summer 1997 Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design Robert Kelley Schneiders Texas Tech University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Schneiders, Robert Kelley, "Flooding The Missouri Valley The Politics Of Dam Site Selection And Design" (1997). Great Plains Quarterly. 1954. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1954 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FLOODING THE MISSOURI VALLEY THE POLITICS OF DAM SITE SELECTION AND DESIGN ROBERT KELLEY SCHNEIDERS In December 1944 the United States Con­ Dakota is 160 feet high and 10,700 feet long. gress passed a Rivers and Harbors Bill that The reservoir behind it stretches 140 miles authorized the construction of the Pick-Sloan north-northwest along the Missouri Valley. plan for Missouri River development. From Oahe Dam, near Pierre, South Dakota, sur­ 1946 to 1966, the United States Army Corps passes even Fort Randall Dam at 242 feet high of Engineers, with the assistance of private and 9300 feet long.! Oahe's reservoir stretches contractors, implemented much of that plan 250 miles upstream. The completion of Gar­ in the Missouri River Valley. In that twenty­ rison Dam in North Dakota, and Oahe, Big year period, five of the world's largest earthen Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point dams dams were built across the main-stem of the in South Dakota resulted in the innundation Missouri River in North and South Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Missouri River
    DID YOU KNOW? The Missouri River is the longest river in North America. The Missouri is the world’s 15th- TODAY’S longest river. The Missouri has the nickname MISSOURI RIVER “Big Muddy,” because of the large The Missouri River has been an important resource for amount of silt that it carries. people living along or near it for thousands of years. As time went on and the corridor of the Missouri River was developed and populations increased, efforts have been There are approximately 150 fish made to control flows, create storage, and prevent flooding. species in the Missouri River, and As a result, six mainstem dams have been in place for more about 300 species of birds live in the than half a century, with the goal of bringing substantial Missouri River’s region. economic, environmental, and social benefits to the people of North Dakota and nine other states. The Missouri’s aquatic and riparian Since the building of the mainstem dams, it has been habitats also support several species realized that for all of the benefits that were provided, the of mammals, such as mink, river dams have also brought controversy. They have created otter, beaver, muskrat, and raccoon. competition between water users, loss of riparian habitat, impacts to endangered species, stream bank erosion, and delta formation - which are only a few of the complex issues The major dams built on the river related to today’s Missouri River management. were Fort Peck, Garrison, Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin’s Point. This educational booklet will outline the many benefits that the Missouri River provides, and also summarize some of the biggest issues that are facing river managers and residents within the basin today.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Corps of Discovery for Missouri River Management Sandra B
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 83 | Issue 2 Article 4 2004 A New Corps of Discovery for Missouri River Management Sandra B. Zellmer University of Nebraska Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Sandra B. Zellmer, A New Corps of Discovery for Missouri River Management, 83 Neb. L. Rev. (2004) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol83/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Sandra B. Zellmer* A New Corps of Discovery for Missouri River Management TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 306 II. The Jeffersonian Corps of Discovery ................... 310 III. Of Famine and Floods: The Flood Control Act of 1944 ............................................... 312 A. The Impetus for the Flood Control Act ............. 312 B. The Implementation of the Flood Control Act ...... 315 IV. The Environmental Era: All Creatures Great and Sm all ............................................ 319 V. The Clash of the Titans: Engineers, Barges, Birds, and Fish .............................................. 324 A. Track One: The States' Flood Control Act Litigation ......................................... 324 B. Track Two: The Environmental Groups' ESA Litigation ......................................... 326 C. The Minnesota Opinion and 2004 Master M anual ........................................... 329 VI. A New Corps of Discovery: An Organic Act for a Sustainable Management Paradigm ................... 334 A. The Law of the Missouri River ..................... 334 B. A Federal Missouri River Organic Act ............. 337 C. The Basic Organic Act Principles .................. 346 D. Other Options, from Most to Least Drastic ........
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    Chapter 4 - Transportation An efficient, safe, and connected transportation system is a key Functional classification is a hierarchical ranking based on the degree of component to a vibrant city. Convenient access to jobs, schools, mobility and access that a street provides (Figure 4.1). Streets are entertainment, recreation, and critical services such as banking, medical generally classified as arterials, collectors and local streets based on the care, and shopping is vitally important to a city’s quality of life. character of the service they provide. This classification is used in Achieving this mobility requires a diverse transportation system of transportation planning, roadway design, and for the allocation of federal roads, transit, bikeways, and sidewalks. roadway improvement funds. Figure 4.2 displays the distribution of roadways by functional classification for the City of Pierre as identified Existing Roadway System by the South Dakota Department of Transportation (DOT). The major highways connecting Pierre to the rest of South Dakota, and the nation, are U.S Routes 14 and 83 and State Highways 34 and 1804. Figure 4.1. Inverse relationship between road access and mobility (FHWA 2006). U.S Routes 14 and 83 and State Highway 34 all converge in downtown Pierre and cross the Missouri River Bridge between Pierre and Fort Pierre. U.S. Route 14 is an east-west highway connecting to Brookings to the east and Rapid City to the west. U.S. Route 83 is a north-south highway which traverses through the center of the state and provides connections to North Dakota and Nebraska. South Dakota Highway 34 is an east-west highway running along the north side of the Missouri River near the Pierre area.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register: 41 Fed. Reg. 30005 (July 21, 1976)
    7-21-7 Vo)41-No.141 WEDNESDAY, JULY 21, 1976 PAGES 30005-30092 E 934 Whighlights PART 1: SALE OF WHEAT TO EGYPT - Presidential determination ......... 30005 PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 FTC proposed adoption of additional routine use for .. 30069, 30085 systemUSIA exemption of records of systems of records.-.......--. 30029 D FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES DOD/AF issues restriction and oversight regulations (2 documents).... 30009, 30011 FELLOWSHIPS FOR INDIAN STUDENTS HEW/OE extends program closing date to 7-2&-76 .... 30054 HIGHWAY PROJECTS DOT/FHA extends comment period to 8-25-76 on pro- posed revision of certification acceptance regulations .- 30027 WALNUTS IN SHELL USDA/AMS proposes amended grade standards; com- ments by 9-15-76 . 30026 FOREIGN-ORIGINATING AIR CHARTERS CAB proposes to relieve US operators of certain regula- tory requirements; comments by 9-3-76 ............ 30027 INCOME TAXES Treasury/IRS announces public hearing on 8-31-76 on proposal regarding treatment of certain aircraft and vessels ....... ... 30026 MANDATORY OIL IMPORT FEA revises program, requests comments by 8-16-76, and gives notice of hearing on 8-19-76, and if necessary 8.-2G-76 .................. ............ 30058 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION SBA amends provision on search and fees effective 7-21-76 .............. ........... 30008 SECURITIES CREDIT FRS amends certain registration, termination of registra- ion and reporting requirements; effective 8-20-76-__ 30007 INTER-DEALER QUOTATION SYSTEMS SEC adopts temporary exemption from Information maintenance requirements concerning submission of price quotations; commentt b ;--I-76 30008 CONTINUED INSNSD IDE HIGHLIGHTS-Continued 0, 1 *GASOLINE FEA: International Energy Agency Industry Advisory FEA adopts rules on Increased pricing flexibility and re- Board, 7-29 and 7-30-76 .................
    [Show full text]
  • Butte County Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan December 2010
    Butte County Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan December 2010 Butte County Office of Emergency Management The Butte County Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan was developed to meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 for the political subdivisions of the City of Belle Fourche, the City of Newell, Town of Nisland (including Fruitdale and Arpan), Vale Township, Union Township (including Castle Rock and Hoover), and Butte County. The original plan was written and approved in 2004. This is an update to the original plan. The purpose of the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan is to provide strategies and enumerate potential projects for mitigating or reducing the loss of life and property in the event of an emergency or disaster within the confines of Butte County and its political subdivisions. BUTTE COUNTY PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank. 2 December 2010 BUTTE COUNTY PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………… 7 I. PLAN DEVELOPMENT …………………………………………………… 9 Planning Partners ………………………………………………………... 9 Statutory Requirements ………………………………………………….. 10 Purpose …………………………………………………………………... 10 Objectives ………………………………………………………………… 10 References ………………………………………………………………... 11 II. PLANNING PROCESS …………………………………………………….. 12 Methodology ……………………………………………………………… 12 Mitigation Actions, Project Goals, Feasibility, and Priorities ……………. 13 Public Comment and Jurisdictional Approval ……………………………. 14 Review …………………………………………………………………….. 14 References ………………………………………………………………… 15 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Peck Draft
    US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Draft Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project Montana Surplus Water Report Volume 1 Surplus Water Report Appendix A – Environmental Assessment August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE PROJECT, MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Fort Peck Dam / Fort Peck Lake, Montana FORT PECK DAM/FORT PECK LAKE MONTANA SURPLUS WATER REPORT August 2012 Prepared By: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Omaha, NE Abstract: The Omaha District is proposing to temporarily make available 6,932 acre-feet/year of surplus water (equivalent to 17,816 acre-feet of storage) from the system-wide irrigation storage available at the Fort Peck Dam/Fort Peck Lake Project, Montana to meet municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply needs. Under Section 6 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Public Law 78-534), the Secretary of the Army is authorized to make agreements with states, municipalities, private concerns, or individuals for surplus water that may be available at any reservoir under the control of the Department. Terms of the agreements are normally for five (5) years, with an option for a five (5) year extension, subject to recalculation of reimbursement after the initial five (5) year period. This proposed action will allow the Omaha District to enter into surplus water agreements with interested water purveyors and to issue easements for up to the total amount of surplus water to meet regional water needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Impact of Gavins Point Dam on the Lowermost~1400 Kilometers of the Missouri River
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Addressing The mpI act Of Gavins Point Dam On The Lowermost~1400 Kilometers Of The iM ssouri River Gregory Leaphart University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Leaphart, G.(2016). Addressing The Impact Of Gavins Point Dam On The Lowermost~1400 Kilometers Of The Missouri River. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3919 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ADDRESSING THE IMPACT OF GAVINS POINT DAM ON THE LOWERMOST ~1400 KILOMETERS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER by Gregory Leaphart Bachelor of Science Clemson University, 2013 ___________________________________________ Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering College of Engineering and Computing University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Enrica Viparelli, Director of Thesis Jasim Imran, Reader Seydehzahra Zhara Samadi, Reader Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of The Graduate School © Copyright by Gregory Leaphart, 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Appreciation is extended toward Dr. Enrica Viparelli for her guidance and direction throughout the duration of graduate school and the thesis process. Gratitude is also given to Zeyad Sulaiman for his assistance throughout the duration of the thesis process. Hybrid Engineering, Inc. and CDM Smith are to be thanked for the extension of employment in spite of the time commitment required by graduate school and the thesis process.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Randall Power Plant Development Plan
    Omaha District Hydropower Master Plan Final Submittal Aug 2016 1 Team Omaha, I am pleased to present the Omaha District Hydropower Master Plan. The Hydropower Master Plan provides a guide for future development decisions. The plan outlines the future requirements that will sustain our hydropower mission capability. Our purpose is to develop a strategic master plan that will guide future programming and funding for all hydropower sustainment, rehabilitation, and modernization requirements in a way that provides predictable funding and maximizes efficiencies to ensure the long-term resilience and reliability of this critical national infrastructure. There are several key tasks essential to our success: Plan for the future with a comprehensive, feasible, and efficient master plan. Program and secure predictable funding to sustain, rehabilitate, and modernize power plant infrastructure according to an established master plan. Prioritize repairs and improvements through risk-informed decisions and communication. Execute funding and complete programmed and funded projects according to contracts and agreements. Our desired end state is to ensure Omaha District hydropower infrastructure is rehabilitated and modernized no later than 2035 to maximize resilience and provide renewable, reliable energy production to the nation for an additional 50 years. I encourage you to become familiar with this plan and to foster greater partnership with every organization whose activities impact the physical development of hydropower in support of the larger U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mission. John W. Henderson, P.E. Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Commander 2 Charter PARTNERING CHARTER We are committed to work together through a positive, effective, and enduring partnership to ensure success of the ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ goals and objectives as outlined in the Omaha District JOHN W.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sharpe 50Ating and Recreation Guide
    Lake Sharpe D ig D end D am 50ating and Recreation Guide Prime<!, 2004 Photo, b\, US Army Corps South D"lOl.1 T"",ism ilnd of Engineers ® U.S. Arml Co. I''' of E,,!(inC('r~ Omaha District Table of Contents Welcome A personal note (rom the Hig lknd ProjecT Opcr~rions Manager wdeoming rOll to L1kc Sh:1Tj)C. Page 1 General Information A listing of general information for Lake Sharpe and the surrounding area. Page 2 Severe Weather Information A thorough listing of safeT)' procedures and information in the event of a SC\'cre weather outbreak. Page 3 Water Safety and Reservoir Navigation An informative listing of ".. ater safety precautions and a gmphica! representation of the reservoir navigation marker s~tcm. Page 4 Recreation Areas An illU5tr:ltivc index map and detailed matrix providing specifics on each of the public recreation facilities. Page 5 Boating and Recreation Guide Maps A collection of descriptive reference maps that encompass the entire Big Bend Proj~'£t aTcn. ISheet I Pages 6 and 7 Ri"t"f Miles: 985.0 fO 997.0/1014.010 1017.0 Recreation Areas: Counselor Creek, Good SoIl!i<'T, Le[l Tailmcf, Low<'T Bm!e Campgrmm,L Low<'T Bmlf Ramp, North Shore, North Shore Beach, Old J-on Thompson, Right TailrCla Clnd Spill"'ClJ Dike [ Sheet 2 Pages 8 and 9 Riwr Miles: 998.0!O 1014.0 Rccrclllion Areas: Jiggs. Narrows, North Bend and West Bend ISheet 3 Pages 10 and 11 1 Rit·<'T Miles: IOII.O!O 1012 .0/1018.0!O 1030.0 Recreation Areas; Joe Creek, North Iron Nation and Soufh Iron Nation IS heet 4 Pages 12 and 13 1 Rit'er Miles: 1027.0!O 1038.0 Rccrclllion
    [Show full text]