DOCSLIB.ORG

OFM Transportation Document 20GOV001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFM Transportation Document 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Hwy Mgmt & Facilities Program (D) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) Hwy Mgmt & Facilities Program (D) 102,710 6,527 6,724 6,352 6,552 6,599 6,648 0 6,647 192,611 Facility Improvements 1,804 1,854 1,899 1,375 1,423 1,470 1,519 0 1,519 22,804 1. 000 D311701 NPDES Facilities Projects 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 0 250 2,522 2. 000 D399301 Olympic Region Headquarters 5755765730000006,053 Facility Site Debt Service 3. 999 D300701 Statewide Administrative Support 979 1,028 1,076 1,125 1,173 1,220 1,269 0 1,269 14,229 Facility Preservation 49,383 4,673 4,825 4,977 5,129 5,129 5,129 0 5,128 99,287 4. 888899M Dayton Ave RHQ - Purchase 1,565000000001,565 Furniture 5. 000 D398136 NPDES Facilies Construcon and 0000000001,145 Renovation 6. 000 D398898 Exisng Facilies Building Codes 0000000002,063 Compliance 7. 000 L2000287 Northwest Region Headquarters 43,2970000000046,502 Renovation 8. 999 D309701 Preservaon and Improvement 4,521 4,673 4,825 4,977 5,129 5,129 5,129 0 5,128 48,012 Minor Works Projects Other 51,5230000000070,520 9. 000 L1000151 Olympic Region Maintenance and 51,5230000000058,541 Administration Facility 10. 000 L2000079 Euclid Ave Administraon Facility 00000000011,979 Consolidation Project T2002 Page 1 December 16, 2019 9:49 AM Version: 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Highway Improvements Program (I) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) Highway Improvements Program (I) 3,447,707 3,652,618 2,248,499 1,668,639 735,510 266,657 299,735 10,000 348,231 24,711,826 Puget Sound Major Corridor Investments 86 00000000396 1. 162 L2000107 SR 162 Study/Design 8600000000396 SR 3, Mason/Kitsap County - Improvements 12,049 25,410 31,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 97,595 2. 003 300344D SR 3/Belfair Area - Widening and 2670000000026,485 Safety Improvements 3. 003 L2000176 SR 3/SR 304 Interchange 1,801000000004,200 Modification 4. 003 T30400R SR 3 Freight Corridor 9,98125,41031,30000000066,910 I-5 / SR 16, Tacoma Area - HOV & Corridor Improvements 352,092 243,356 67,373 0 0 0 0 0 77,840 1,975,946 5. 005 300504A I-5/Tacoma HOV Improvements 154,215 89,319 17,373 0 0 0 0 0 77,840 1,478,546 (Nickel/TPA) 6. 005 M00100R I-5 JBLM Corridor Improvements 197,055 154,037 50,000 0 0 0000494,400 7. 016 L2000175 SR 16/Corridor Congestion Study 822000000003,000 I-5, Lewis County Area - Corridor Improvements 6,107 10,341 45,525 10,00020,00020,500000280,738 8. 005 400508W I-5/Mellen Street I/C to Grand 80000000000153,138 Mound I/C - Add Lanes 9. 005 L1000223 I-5/Rush Road Interchange 67932100000001,000 Improvements 10. 005 L2000204 I-5/North Lewis County 00010,00020,00020,50000050,500 Interchange 11. 005 L2000223 I-5/Rebuild Chamber Way 4,62810,02045,52500000076,100 Interchange Improvements I-5, Olympia Freeway 46,7390000000074,518 12. 005 L1000231 I-5 Corridor from Mounts Road to 2,250000000002,250 Tumwater 13. 005 L1100110 I-5/Marvin Road/SR 510 44,4890000000072,268 Interchange I-5, Puget Sound Area - Improvements 81,654 67,609 30,000 48,000 13,000 26,000 0 0 19,367 419,848 14. 005 100502B I-5/SR 161/SR 18 Interchange 1000000001,943 Improvements - Stage 2 T2002 Page 2 December 16, 2019 9:49 AM Version: 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Highway Improvements Program (I) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) 15. 005 100521W I-5/NB Seneca St to SR 520 - 17,9910000000021,234 Mobility Improvements 16. 005 100536D I-5/SR 525 Interchange Phase 0000000019,36720,010 17. 005 300596T I-5/SR 510 to SR 512 - Mobility 00000000022,423 Improvements 18. 005 800502K I-5/SR 161/SR 18 - Interchange 1,1780000000089,276 Improvements 19. 005 L2000139 I-5/156th NE Interchange in 0003,00013,00026,00000042,000 Marysville 20. 005 L2000160 I-5/Ship Canal Noise Wall 4003,10000000003,500 21. 005 L2000229 I-5/NB Marine View Dr to SR 529 50,49429,658000000084,233 – Corridor & Interchange Improvements 22. 005 T20400R I-5 Federal Way - Triangle Vicinity 010,00030,00045,0000000085,000 Improvements 23. 005 T20700SC I-5/116th Street NE, 88th Street 11,59024,851000000049,729 NE, and SR 528/Marine Drive Interchange 24. 099 L1000176 SR 99/I-5 Interchange - Fife 000000000500 I-5, SW Washington - Corridor Improvements 336 0 10,400 74,800 12,5000000218,661 25. 005 400506H I-5/NE 134th St Interchange (I-5/I- 1510000000085,698 205) - Rebuild Interchange 26. 005 400510A I-5/SR 432 Talley Way 140000000034,913 Interchanges - Rebuild Interchanges 27. 005 L2000099 I-5/Mill Plain Boulevard 0010,40074,80012,500000097,700 28. 005 L2000259 Replacement Bridge on Interstate 17100000000350 5 across the Columbia River I-5, Vancouver - Columbia River Crossing 35,0000000000035,000 29. 005 G2000088 I-5/Columbia River Bridge 35,0000000000035,000 I-5, Whatcom/Skagit County - Improvements 11,0989,0009,96900000031,434 30. 005 L1000099 I-5/Slater Road Interchange - 2,0009,0009,96900000020,969 Improvements T2002 Page 3 December 16, 2019 9:49 AM Version: 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Highway Improvements Program (I) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) 31. 005 L2000119 I-5/Northbound on-ramp at 8,616000000009,915 Bakerview 32. 005 L2000255 I-5/Exit 274 Interchange 48200000000550 SR 9, Snohomish County - Corridor Improvements 61,004 49,800 87,500 25,500 0 0 0 0 3,847 342,922 33. 009 100900F SR 9/212th St SE to 176th St SE, 00000000053,463 Stage 3 - Add Lanes 34. 009 100904B SR 9/176th Street SE to SR 96 - 17,1620000000021,979 Widening 35. 009 100914G SR 9/SR 96 to Marsh Rd - Add 10000000029,540 Lanes and Improve Intersections 36. 009 100916G SR 9/Lake Stevens Way to 20th St 00000000011,818 SE - Improve Intersection 37. 009 100921G SR 9/SR 528 - Improve 000000003,8473,847 Intersection 38. 009 100922G SR 9/84th St NE (Getchell Road) 11000000006,745 Improve Intersection 39. 009 L1000240 SR 9/South Lake Stevens Road 4,000000000004,000 Roundabout 40. 009 N00900R SR 9/Marsh Road to 2nd Street 5,21023,80087,50025,50000000142,100 Vic - Widening 41. 009 N92040R SR 9/SR 204 Interchange 34,62026,000000000069,430 US 12, Tri-Cities to Walla Walla - Corridor Improvements 118,791 36,0000000000247,147 42. 012 501203X US 12/Frenchtown Vicinity to 1230000000051,652 Walla Walla - Add Lanes 43. 012 501210T US 12/Nine Mile Hill to 16000000005,371 Woodward Canyon Vic - Build New Highway 44. 012 501212I US 12/SR 124 Intersecon - Build 570000000021,317 Interchange 45. 012 T20900R US-12/Walla Walla Corridor 118,595 36,0000000000168,807 Improvements T2002 Page 4 December 16, 2019 9:49 AM Version: 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Highway Improvements Program (I) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) US 12, Yakima Area - Improvements 0000000037,08438,439 46. 012 501208J US 12/Old Naches Highway - Build 0000000037,08438,439 Interchange SR 14, Clark/Skamania County - Corridor Improvements 49,643 7,365 0000000116,239 47. 014 401409W SR 14/Camas Washougal - Add 380000000048,777 Lanes and Build Interchange 48. 014 L1000157 SR 14 Access Improvements 5,770000000007,726 49. 014 L2000074 SR 14/ Wind River Junction 5,121000000008,736 50. 014 L2000102 SR 14/I-205 to SE 164th Ave - 19,6313,000000000025,000 Auxiliary Lanes 51. 014 L2220062 SR 14/Bingen Underpass 19,0834,365000000026,000 SR 16, Tacoma - New Narrows Bridge 00000057,5930057,593 52. 016 TNB001A SR16/ Repayment of Sales Tax for 00000057,5930057,593 New Tacoma Narrows Bridge SR 17, Moses Lake Vicinity - Improvements 2200000000105 53. 017 201701G SR 17/Adams Co Line - Access 2200000000105 Control SR 18, Auburn to I-90 - Corridor Widening 23,190 18,000000000048,008 54. 018 101822A SR 18/Issaquah/Hobart Rd to 9000000003,026 Tigergate - Add Lanes 55. 018 101826A SR 18/Tigergate to I-90 - Add 0000000002,982 Lanes 56. 018 L1000120 SR 164 East Auburn Access 14,1960000000015,000 57. 018 L1000199 SR 18 Widening - Issaquah/Hobart 8,98518,000000000027,000 Rd to Raging River SR 20, Island County - Safety Improvements 1069123000003,678 58. 020 L2200042 SR 20 Race Road to Jacob's Road 1069123000003,678 SR 20, West Skagit County - Improvements 8430000000013,303 59. 020 L1000112 SR 20/Sharpes Corner Vicinity 8430000000013,303 Intersection T2002 Page 5 December 16, 2019 9:49 AM Version: 20GOV001 2019-21 Biennium -- 2020 Supplemental 20GOV001 - Governor Proposed Highway Improvements Program (I) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) SR 24, Yakima to Hanford - Improvements 40000000050,526 60.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTIONS from the North (Everett, Bellingham, Vancouver, BC) 1) Take South on I-5
    DIRECTIONS From the North (Everett, Bellingham, Vancouver, BC) 1) Take south on I-5. 2) Look for and get off at the exit marked N. 45th Street and N. 50th Street. 3) Turn to the left (east) onto N.E. 50th Street. (If you miss 50th, get off on 45th). 4) Go approximately 3/4 mile on N.E. 50th (or 45th), turn right (south) onto 15th Avenue N.E. 5) Go to the fourth light (one block past the pedestrian overpass) to N.E. 40th Street. 6) Get into the left-hand turn lane at N.E. 40th Street. 7) Enter the UW campus at Gate 5 (N.E. 40th and 15th Ave. N.E.). 8) Go up the hill past Gate 5 and turn right (south) onto Stevens Way at the first corner. 9) Benson Hall is the third building down the road on the left-hand side. 10) Turn into the lower driveway, just before the "Benson Hall" sign. 11) There is a 30-minute limit for parking in the Loading Zone area of Benson Hall. The "Parking Enforcement" is strictly monitored. From the Eastside (Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond) 1. Take I-520 west, across the Lake Washington floating bridge, towards Seattle. 2. On the Seattle side, take the second exit, "Montlake." 3. At the end of the exit, go right onto Montlake Avenue; you'll be heading north. Start moving over to the left lane as soon as you can. 4. Proceed across the Montlake Bridge, a small lift bridge crossing the Lake Washington Ship Canal. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Scoping Summary Report
    Early Scoping Summary Report April 2018 West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions Summary Purpose Sound Transit conducted early scoping for the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions (WSBLE) Project in Seattle, Washington, from February 2 through March 5, 2018. The early scoping started the public planning and environmental processes for the project. This report describes how Sound Transit conducted early scoping and summarizes the comments received from local and regulatory agencies, tribes, and the public during the early scoping period. This information will be considered by Sound Transit as it identifies and studies alternatives for the WSBLE Project. The Early Scoping Process Sound Transit published an early scoping notice in the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) register on February 2, 2018, which initiated early scoping and started the 30-day comment period. Additional public notification was provided with mailed postcards, print and online advertisements, and social media notices. Three public open houses and an agency meeting were held during this comment period, as well as an online open house from February 12 to March 5, 2018. Sound Transit requested comments on the purpose and need, the Representative Project, other potential alternatives, and potential community benefits and impacts. Comments were accepted by mail, email, online comment forms, and on comment boards and maps at the open houses (both in person and online). Agency Early Scoping Thirty-four federal, state, regional, and local agencies received
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-21 Proposed Transportation Projects
    OFM Transportation Document 19GOV001 as developed December 10, 2018 Hwy Mgmt & Facilities Program (D) (Dollars In Thousands) Funding Source Total Rte Project Project Title TPA Nic CW Oth 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 2027-29 2029-31 2031-33 2033-35 Future (incl Prior) Hwy Mgmt & Facilities Program (D) 32,917 95,614 7,601 6,724 6,353 6,552 6,599 6,648 0 0 201,235 Facility Improvements 2,047 1,804 1,854 1,899 1,376 1,423 1,470 1,519 0 0 21,387 000 D311701 NPDES Facilities Projects £ £ £ R 495 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 0 0 2,245 000 D399301 Olympic Region Headquarters Facility £ £ £ R 573 575 576 573 1 0 0 0 0 0 6,128 Site Debt Service 999 D300701 Statewide Administrative Support £ £ £ R 979 979 1,028 1,076 1,125 1,173 1,220 1,269 0 0 13,014 Facility Preservation 6,387 51,313 5,747 4,825 4,977 5,129 5,129 5,129 0 0 95,786 000 888899M Dayton Ave RHQ - Purchase Furniture £ £ £ R 0 3,130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,130 000 D398136 NPDES Facilities Construction and £ £ £ R 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,139 Renovation 000 D398898 Existing Facilities Building Codes £ £ £ R 458 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,063 Compliance 000 L2000287 Northwest Region Headquarters £ £ £ R 1,764 43,662 1,074 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,500 Renovation 999 D309701 Preservation and Improvement Minor £ £ £ R 4,099 4,521 4,673 4,825 4,977 5,129 5,129 5,129 0 0 42,954 Works Projects Other 24,466 42,497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,539 000 L1000151 Olympic Region Maintenance and £ £ R £ 15,166 42,497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,539 Administration Facility 000 L2000079 Euclid Ave Administration Facility £ £ R £ 9,300
    [Show full text]
  • SR 520/I-5 Express Lanes Connection Project City of Seattle Major Public
    City of Seattle Major Public Project Construction Noise Variance Application SR 520/I-5 Express Lanes Connection Project Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation Lead Author Ginette Lalonde WSP USA June 23, 2019 Major Public Project Construction Noise Variance Application Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Descriptions and Proposed Construction Activities ...................................................................... 3 SR 520/I-5 Project Overview and Project Site Description ................................................................... 3 Expected Construction Activities ......................................................................................................... 7 SDOT Compliance with City of Seattle Criteria for a Major Public Project Construction Noise Variance .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Definition of Major Public Project ....................................................................................................... 9 SMC 25.08.168: The Definition of a Major Public Project ............................................................... 9 SMC 23.84A.030 “P”: The Definition of Public Facility .................................................................. 9 Criteria for Granting a Noise Variance ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Entities
    April 2019 Government Entities AE 0036-17 List of Government Entity, Business and Business Organization, and Community Organization Commenters DRAFT – For internal discussion only. Not reviewed or approved on behalf of any party. ~I~ City of Seattle April 2, 2019 Lauren Swift Central Corri~or Environmental Manager 401 S Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Ms. Swift, Thank you for the invitation to participate as a Cooperating Agency and the opportunity to provide scoping comments for the environmental process for the Sound Transit West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions (WSBLE) Project. This letter details the comments and concerns of City of Seattle staff as you determine actions, alternatives, and impacts to be evaluated in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DE IS). The City appreciates the ambitious scope and time lines for this project and continues to be committed to helping Sound Transit deliver this project on schedule. The detail in the City scoping letter is provided to state our support for the WSLBE project moving forward and to flag key issues that the DEIS needs to cover, in order to help Sound Transit avoid delays or additional environmental review. In addition to the specific comments attached in the Technical Memo, the following reflect fundamental areas of specific importance. Alternatives Development The City commends Sound Transit for the extensive planning and public engagement activities that have informed the alternatives development phase of the project. This advancement of technical work and engagement successfully narrowed the range of potential DEIS alternatives from hundreds down to a few and built agreement in most project segments for what impacts and refinements should be studied.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE UNION Historical WALKING TOUR
    B HistoryLink.org Lake Union Walking Tour | Page 1 b Introduction: Lake Union the level of Lake Union. Two years later the waters of Salmon Bay were raised behind the his is a Cybertour of Seattle’s historic Chittenden Locks to the level of Lake Union. South Lake Union neighborhood, includ- Historical T As the Lake Washington Ship Canal’s ing the Cascade neighborhood and portions Walking tour Government Locks (now Hiram of the Denny Regrade. It was written Chittenden Locks) neared its 1917 and curated by Paula Becker with completion, the shores of Lake Union the assistance of Walt Crowley and sprouted dozens of boat yards. For Paul Dorpat. Map by Marie McCaffrey. most of the remaining years of the Preparation of this feature was under- twentieth century, Lake Union was written by Vulcan Inc., a Paul G. Allen one of the top wooden-boat building Company. This Cybertour begins at centers in the world, utilizing rot- Lake Union Park, then loosely follows resistant local Douglas fir for framing the course of the Westlake Streetcar, and Western Red Cedar for planking. with forays into the Cascade neighbor- During and after World War I, a hood and into the Seattle Center area. fleet of wooden vessels built locally for the war but never used was moored Seattle’s in the center of Lake Union. Before “Little Lake” completion of the George Washington ake Union is located just north of the Washington, Salmon Bay, and Puget Sound. Memorial Bridge (called Aurora Bridge) in L geographic center and downtown core A little more than six decades later, Mercer’s 1932, a number of tall-masted ships moored of the city of Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • This in and out of Downtown Seattle and Also Serves As Includes the Central Waterfront Tunnel, the Olympic a Major Corridor Through Seattle
    A Transportation Future for the Puget Sound Region Specifi c Projects Highway 99/ in the environmental review process: “Rebuild,” “Aerial” and “Tunnel.” Alaskan Way Viaduct In 2002, the City of Seattle and the state DOT endorsed a four-mile design from Spokane On February 28, 2001, when the Alaskan Street to Mercer Street between the Seattle Center Way Viaduct (Highway 99 in downtown Seattle) and I-5. Two miles of cut and cover and bored was badly damaged in a 6.8 magnitude earthquake tunnels were the favored option, to which the Advi- it became clear that the next big quake might bring sory Committee has concurred. As Bruce Agnew the structure down. It also turns out that the sea- is a member of the Committee, we can report that wall holding back Elliott Bay is so badly deterio- the methodology used in exploring various options rated it must be replaced. Engineers estimate that was thorough and open. there is a fi ve percent chance the viaduct will fall The tunnel option is the most expensive pro- in a more serious quake in the next ten years. The posal, up to $11.6 billion if it is built within 15 state DOT and the City of Seattle have collabo- years, and potentially $15.7 billion if built over 30 rated on a plan to design options for replacing the years. These high estimates are due in part to util- viaduct and seawall as quickly as possible. The ity relocation and the cost of keeping existing traf- loss of Referendum 51 will shut down that effort fi c open during construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk the Circumference of Lake Union: Tues
    Walk the Circumference of Lake Union: Tues. March 20, 2017 (6.5 miles! Meeting 8:00 - 8:30AM at Starbucks: 1200 Westlake Ave N (98109) Lake Union is a freshwater lake entirely ,ithin the 'eattle, Washington city limits and a major portion of the Lake Washington 'hip Canal. 1ts easternmost point is the 'hip Canal 2ridge, ,hich carries 1nterstate over the eastern arm of the lake and separates Lake Union from 3ortage 2ay. Lake Union is the namesake of the neighborhoods located on its east and ,est shores: 4astlake and Westlake, respectively. The northern shore of the lake is home to 5as Works 3ark. &s you ,alk out 'tarbucks6 door, turn left on 7exter &ve. Walk north 2 (locks till you come to 5aler 't. Use the cross,alk to cross 7exter &ve. Use ramp that ,ill take you to the 7exter 9ill Clim((stair,ay). Continue ,alking over the pedestrian (ridge at the base of the stair,ay. 9eading north, ,e ,ill ,alk as close to the shore of Lake Union as possible passing Westlake Marina, Channel 13, 4lectric 2oat Company, China 9arbor, *W :utdoor Center, 2oat,orld Marina, 2lue Water ;achts, 9ouse 2oat Community #1(92 Com. #1), remnants of railroad ties, Lake Union Crew, 92 Com. #2(West Lake Cove), 92 Com. #3 = &urora 2ridge. *ext ,e ,ill climb the stairs leading to >remont 2ridge. &fter crossing the bridge, take the stairs down to the 2urke 5ilman Trail (25T! = &dobe Campus along the ship canal. Continue east along the 25T to the statue of 'ri Chinmoy. >ollow the trail under the &urora 2ridge passing 92 Com.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Transportation Chronology
    Transportation Chronology by Kit Oldham, updated 2004/p.1 Updated by Kit, 2004 WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION CHRONOLOGY 1835. The Hudson's Bay Company ship Beaver is the first steamship to travel on Puget Sound. HL #1946 October-November, 1845 . The Michael Simmons-George Bush party cuts a makeshift road from Cowlitz Landing (now Toledo) on the Cowlitz River to Budd Inlet on Puget Sound, where they establish Tumwater, the first American settlement north of the Columbia River. Dorpat, 63; HL # 5646; Meeker, 158. 1851 . A crude wooden track portage line along the north bank of the Columbia river at the Cascades in the Columbia Gorge is the first railway constructed in the future Washington. Schwantes, Railroad , 15. 1852 . The first road established by law in the future Washington state is Byrd's Mill Road between Puyallup, Tacoma, and Steilacoom, established by the Oregon Territorial Legislature. Garrett, 3. 1853 . First overland passenger service from Olympia to the Columbia River begins; passengers are initially carried on freight wagons known as mudwagons (given the poor conditions on the route which do not improve much even when a military road is completed in 1861), with stage coaches coming into use as passengers numbers increase. (Except for the Columbia-Puget Sound connection, stagecoaches are little used in Western Washington, as the waters of Puget Sound provide the crucial transportation links). Dorpat, 66-67; Schwantes, Journey , 88-89. 1853. The steamer Fairy is the first steamer to provide regular service among Puget Sound ports. HL #869 January 7, 1853. Congress appropriates $20,000 for a military road from Fort Steilacoom to Fort Walla Walla by way of Naches Pass, a route that Indians used for generations to travel between Puget Sound and the Yakima Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • BACK to the FUTURE: a History of Transit Planning in the Puget Sound Region
    BACK TO THE FUTURE: A History of Transit Planning in the Puget Sound Region TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Nomination Project Description / compliance with review criteria Description of outreach Project Summary Chapters Letters of endorsement BACK TO THE FUTURE: A History of Transit Planning in the Puget Sound Region The next several pages contain summaries of the them coming on line was slow to materialize. six chapters that comprise Back to the Future. The Back to the Future presents the results of a CBE full 180 page Back to the Future document has been program under the name BE Labs. As explained published on LuLu Online in May, 2013, and is on the CBE web site, “BE Labs expressly engage available on the flash drive submitted with this award grand challenge problems, test novel methods, and application. Each chapter is an individual research promote rigorously transdisciplinary frameworks report prepared by one of the students enrolled for research, instruction, and design inquiry.” in the BE seminar in Fall 2011 and Winter 2012. The concept for this work originated when PROJECT DESCRIPTION Christine Bae, Manish Chalana, Jeffrey Ochsner, As these papers show, the history of transportation Louisa Iarocci and Ann Huppert, discussed the infrastructure development in the Puget Sound lack of available information about the history of Region has been immensely complex, with multiple the development of the physical form of Seattle overlapping agencies implementing various modes and surrounding communities. The discussion of transportation and sometimes competing, rather also touched on questions of how decisions were than cooperating, in the provision of services to made that produced the network of transportation the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Panel: the Big Gray Thing in the Room Accelerating GSI
    Pavement Panel: The Big Gray Thing in the Room Accelerating GSI investment at the nexus of roads and toxic runoff The Problem: Toxic runoff can impact human health and ecological systems Stormwater runoff is largest source of pollution to Puget Sound • 75% of the toxic chemicals entering Puget Sound are carried by stormwater runoff • Despite the amount of polluted stormwater coming off bridges and roadways, very little is spent on retrofitting 25%-35% of an average city is Right of Way Most ROW was built before modern stormwater codes 75% of pollutants in Puget Sound are from hard urban surfaces Kids attend schools so close to busy roads that traffic exhaust poses a health risk. Urban heat islands are a double- whammy for health. The heat poses health risks to the elderly, people with heart disease and diabetes. The hottest places in the city are also more polluted. Southern Resident killer whales are on a course headed for extinction with key contributors being Chinook salmon prey shortage & high levels of toxic chemicals from stormwater runoff affecting Orca immune systems, health and reproductive rates. Multiple Benefits of Green Stormwater Infrastructure An analysis of green and grey infrastructure in Philadelphia revealed that the option including GSI was clearly the better financial choice for managing stormwater. Cost: $2.4 billion Co-Benefits: $2.85 billion Cost: $3.8 billion Co-Benefits: $0.122 billion Issues and Constraints to GSI Implementation Diverting Pollution from Community Assets Perceived GSI Limited Access Limited Performance
    [Show full text]
  • 3800 Latona a Living Building Pilot Project
    3800 LATONA A LIVING BUILDING PILOT PROJECT 3800 LATONA AVENUE NE EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE, 01/06/20 SDCI PROJECT #3034466-EG LATONA STATION, LLC COPYRIGHT 2019 WEBER THOMPSON | WEBERTHOMPSON.COM INTENTIONALLY BLANK CONTENTS SECTION 1: PROJECT INTRODUCTION SECTION 4: DESIGN OPTIONS LOCATOR MAP....................................................................................................2 EARLY MASSING STUDIES.........................................................................25 PROJECT INTRODUCTION...........................................................................3 PRIORITY DESIGN GUIDELINES........................................................26-27 ASPIRATIONS......................................................................................................4 MASSING CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES..............................................29-35 COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY....................................................5 LANDSCAPE DESIGN................................................................................36-39 LIVING BUILDING PILOT PROGRAM...................................................6-7 DESIGN INSPIRATION.............................................................................40-41 ARCHITECT AND CLIENT PORTFOLIO...........................................42 SECTION 2: CONTEXT ANALYSIS SECTION 5: APPENDIX ECOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY............................................8 LATONA HISTORY............................................................................................9 ZONING SUMMARY........................................................................................44
    [Show full text]