Full Plan (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full Plan (PDF) TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE Smart Growth Plan Prepared by Heyer, Gruel & Associates October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PLANNING CONTEXT AND HISTORY 25 Vision......................................................................................................1 Master Plan - Overview ........................................................................25 What is Smart Growth?..............................................................................2 Draft Master Plan Reexamination Report (2006).......................................25 South Orange – Example of Smart Growth....................................................2 Recreation & Open Space Plan and Recreation Element of the Land Use Master Purpose of Smart Growth Plan.....................................................................2 Plan (2004)........................................................................................26 The Process...............................................................................................3 Short-Term Goals.................................................................................27 The Plan...................................................................................................4 Mid-Term Goals (by 2010)....................................................................27 Action Plan.........................................................................................27 Non-Acquisition Related Action Items......................................................29 PLANNING ASSESSMENT Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Plan (2005)........................................29 EVALUATION OF EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 7 Village-Wide Recommendations .............................................................30 Current, Historic and Projected Population Growth.........................................7 Recommendations - Primary Corridors and Routes.....................................32 Anticipated Growth in Employment and Non-Residential Development..............8 Recommendations - Bicycle Connections Among Parks...............................34 Existing Land Use......................................................................................9 Recommendations - Additional Bicycle Routes...........................................34 Population and Household Composition 7.....................................................10 Recommendations - Key Destinations.......................................................35 Housing Characteristics .............................................................................11 East Branch of the Rahway River Corridor – Master Plan Report..................38 Transit.....................................................................................................13 Southern Segment................................................................................38 Vehicular Circulation.................................................................................14 Central Segment..................................................................................40 Open Space, Parks and Recreation.............................................................16 Northern Segment................................................................................41 School District Projections..........................................................................19 Housing Element and Fair Share Plan (2005)...........................................42 Infrastructure............................................................................................19 Central Business District and Surrounding Area - Historic Resources....................................................................................19 Revitalization/Redevelopment................................................................43 Environmental Conditions...........................................................................22 Streetscape Improvements......................................................................43 South Orange Train Station Redevelopment Plan.......................................43 Central Business District Redevelopment Plan............................................44 TABLE OF CONTENTS Church Street Redevelopment Plan...............................................................46 Newark..............................................................................................54 Redevelopment Projects .............................................................................46 Maplewood........................................................................................55 Transit Village Designation.........................................................................48 Orange ..............................................................................................53 Main Street New Jersey .............................................................................48 West Orange......................................................................................55 Land Development Chapter.........................................................................49 East Orange.......................................................................................56 Residential - Single-Family (RA) Districts .......................................................49 Residential – Two-Family (RB) District............................................................49 PLANNING ISSUES 59 Residential – Townhouse (RTH) District..........................................................49 Meetings of the Smart Growth Plan Committee.........................................59 Residential – Senior Citizen (RSC) Housing District.........................................50 Initial Public Outreach Program .............................................................59 Residential – Planned Residential Cluster (PRC) Districts..................................50 Strengths............................................................................................59 Residential – Multi-Family/Office (RC-1) District ............................................50 Key Issues...........................................................................................61 Primary Business (B-1) District.....................................................................50 Central Business District .......................................................................61 Secondary Business (B-2) District.................................................................51 Valley Street........................................................................................65 General Business (B-3) District.....................................................................51 Irvington Avenue..................................................................................69 University (U) District.................................................................................51 Parking ..............................................................................................73 Open Space Public Use (OS/PU) District......................................................51 Vehicular Traffic...................................................................................73 Walking/Biking/Transit ........................................................................74 PLANNING COORDINATION – STATE, REGION AND ADJOINING Parks, Open Space and Recreation........................................................75 MUNICIPALITIES 53 Community Character...........................................................................76 State Development and Redevelopment Plan (SDRP).......................................53 Essex County 2004 Cross-Acceptance Report...............................................53 THE PLAN Essex County Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan (April 2003)........53 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 79 Ivy Hill Park.............................................................................................54 South Mountain Reservation.......................................................................54 COMMUNITY CHARACTER 85 Adjacent Municipalities .............................................................................54 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historic Preservation..................................................................................85 Urban Design...........................................................................................91 Business Districts.......................................................................................94 Other Land Use and Zoning Issues.............................................................104 CIRCULATION 117 Walking/Biking/Transit...........................................................................117 Parking.................................................................................................118 Vehicular Traffic.....................................................................................119 PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 122 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 129 STRATEGIC PLAN 132 Implementation Strategies.......................................................................132 Funding Plan.........................................................................................140 APPENDIX A- Smart Growth Survey..........................................................144 APPENDIX B- Visioning Session Input........................................................164 APPENDIX C- Lot Size Analysis................................................................169
Recommended publications
  • Housing Connections Growth
    economy social housing connections growth top three % in education: health: % % +/- average % owner railway within thirty % growth employment employment % with a good general house price occupied station miles of large 1954 - types [s.a. 44.67] quailification health [s.a.£150,257] [s.a. 62.59] settlement 2006 [s.a. 66.77] [s.a. 89.85] girvan 38.39 57.02 88.47 13 60.51 1.2 c o a s t a l 115 51.77 62.11 92.5 25 65.13 - 0.64 lerwick 41.14 63.85 93.15 156 68.38 41.96 north berwick performance structure and history top employer [s] - health & manufacturing Coastal towns have had a variety of different roles and functions through time. However, in all cases their location 2/7 have higher than average % of people in was the reason for their early existence. The sea provided employment harbours for fishing and coast lines provided strategic de- fensive positions. Fishing and associated trade provided a 0/7 have a higher than average % of people with qualifications catalyst for growth and many of the towns became market towns as a result. Four out of the seven towns studied were 5/7 have better than average health granted Royal Burgh status, marking the importance of the harbour. 7/7 have higher than average house price 5/7 have higher than average owner occupation The arrival of railways in the 19th century marked a change in fate for these towns. With attractive coastal locations, 3/7 have a railway towns such as North Berwick and Dunbar began to attract tourists.
    [Show full text]
  • Lindbergh Center Station: a Commuter Commission Landpro 2009
    LINDBERGH CENTER Page 1 of 4 STATION Station Area Profile Transit Oriented Development Land Use Within 1/2 Mile STATION LOCATION 2424 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30324 Sources: MARTA GIS Analysis 2012 & Atlanta Regional Lindbergh Center Station: A Commuter Commission LandPro 2009. Town Center Station Residential Demographics 1/2 Mile The MARTA Transit Oriented Development Guidelines Population 7,640 classify Lindbergh Center station as a “Commuter Town Median Age 30.7 Center”. The “Guidelines” present a typology of stations Households 2,436 ranging from Urban Core stations, like Peachtree Center Avg. Household Size 3.14 STATION ESSENTIALS Station in downtown Atlanta, to Collector stations - i.e., end of the line auto commuter oriented stations such as Median Household Income $69,721 Daily Entries: 8,981 Indian Creek or North Springs. This classification system Per Capita Income $28,567 reflects both a station’s location and its primary func- Parking Capacity: 2,519 tion. Business Demographics 1 Mile Parking Businesses 1,135 The “Guidelines” talk about Commuter Town Center Utilization: 69% Employees 12,137 stations as having two functions – as “collector” stations %White Collar 67.8 Station Type: At-Grade serving a park-and ride function for those travelling else- %Blue Collar 10.5 Commuter where via the train, and as “town centers” serving as Station Typology Town Center %Unemployed 10.0 nodes of dense active mixed-use development, either Source: Site To Do Business on-line, 2011 Land Area +/- 47 acres historic or newly planned. The Guidelines go on to de- MARTA Research & Analysis 2010 scribe the challenge of planning a Town Center station which requires striking a balance between those two in Atlanta, of a successful, planned, trans- SPENDING POTENTIAL INDEX functions “… Lindbergh City Center has, over the dec- it oriented development.
    [Show full text]
  • NETWORK and PLACE Phil Erickson, Community Design + Architecture Marcy Mcinelly, SERA
    Creating & Supporting a New Urbanist Urban Form NETWORK AND PLACE Phil Erickson, Community Design + Architecture Marcy McInelly, SERA CNU Transportation Summit | Charlotte, NC | November 6-8, 2008 Steps Towards Implementing Sustainable Transportation Network • Definition of Network • Guidance for Specific & Place Elements Design Issues • Method of Integrative • Implementation Design Strategy CNU Transportation Summit | Charlotte, NC | November 6-8, 2008 Defining the Terms of Discussion • “Network” – Full multi-modal transportation infrastructure of urban environments • “Place” – Full spectrum of land use and form that make up urban environments CNU Transportation Summit | Charlotte, NC | November 6-8, 2008 Conventional Practice • Simplifies Network and Place – Regional Transportation Plans • Simplify land use • Do not look at full network – General or Community Plans • Rarely can influence all the transportation variables – Corridor Plans • Focus only on a portion of network – Transit Plans • Land use typically secondary CNU Transportation Summit | Charlotte, NC | November 6-8, 2008 Scale of the Discussion • CNU Charter – The block, the street, and the building – The neighborhood, the district, and the corridor – The region: metropolis, city, and town – Beyond the region (inter-regional): the state, the nation, and the planet? CNU Transportation Summit | Charlotte, NC | November 6-8, 2008 Link and Place • Transportation Function and Land Use Conditions have equal footing in the design of streets • Stephen Marshall et. al. CNU Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Resilient Scituate, Climate Vulnerability Assessment And
    Building a Resilient Scituate Climate Vulnerability Assessment and Action Plan March 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project was conducted by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) with funding from MAPC’s Planning for MetroFuture District Local Technical Assistance program. METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL Officers President Keith Bergman Vice President Erin Wortman Secretary Sandra Hackman Treasurer Taber Keally Executive Director Marc D. Draisen Senior Environmental Planner Darci Schofield GIS/Data Analysis Darci Schofield and Eliza Wallace Town of Scituate Town Administrator James Boudreau Chair, Board of Selectmen Maura C. Curran STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Department of Public Works Kevin Cafferty Engineering Sean McCarthy Director of Planning and Economic Development Brad Washburn Chief of Scituate Fire/Emergency Manager John Murphy Chief of Scituate Police Michael Stewart Board of Health Director Jennifer Keefe Coastal Resource Officer Nancy Durfee Natural Resource and Conservation Officer Amy Walkey Building Commissioner Robert Vogel Council on Aging Director Linda Hayes Director of Facilities Kevin Kelly Recreation Director Maura Clancy Building a Resilient Scituate EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Climate change is the most compelling environmental, economic, and social issue of our time. Scituate, known for its numerous barrier beaches, prominent bedrock headlands, and rich cultural history, is one of the most vulnerable regions in Massachusetts. It is routinely hit hard with coastal storms causing massive storm surge and inundation with even just a lunar high tide. Projected sea level rise and changes in intensity of storm and precipitation events compel the need to Scituate, Winter Storm Riley, March 2018. Source: assess the vulnerability of Scituate’s people and places Simon Brewer as well as plan for protecting its future.
    [Show full text]
  • By Marion E. Ford Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For
    CONTROL OF EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, NETROPOLITAN AREA by Marion E. Ford Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1951 Signature Dept. of City and Regional Planning May 19, 1951 CONTROL OF EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, METROPOLITAN AREA. Marion E. Ford Submitted for the degree of Master of City Planning in the Department of City and Regional Planning on May 19, 1951. Control of expansion and development in the Providence, Rhode Island, metropolitan area is considered necessary in order to stabilize the economic structure of each municipr- lity, to maintain the social value of community life and to preserve the amenities of the countryside. A sketch plan for the metropolitan area, based on a forecast of population for the year 1970 and on basic planning data, has been made which incorporates the principles of self- contained commuter and satellite communities, varying in size and connected with each other and with places of employmmit, recreation and culture by a radial and belt system of limited- access highways and parkways. Detailed plans for two selected towns in the area bring out the problems for which control measures are necessary. These problems are, principally, - 1) the excessive costs to municipalities resulting-from dispersed settlement, 2) the inefficient and, frequently, undesirable pattern of land use which results from such dispersion, and 3) the lack of coor- dination between plans and policies of municipalities resulting from independent jurisdiction of control. The control measures recommended are state, metropolitan and local in scale.
    [Show full text]
  • UOG/CSSH/Department of Population Studies Urbanization in Developing
    UOG/CSSH/Department of Population Studies CHAPTER ONE Urbanization 1.1. Definition and Concepts An urban area is spatial concentration of people who are working in non-agricultural activities. The essential characteristic is that urban means non-agricultural. Urban can also be explained as a fairly multifaceted concept. Criteria used to define urban can include population size, space, density, and economic organization. Typically, urban is simply defined by some baseline size, like 20 000 people. The definition of an urban area changes from country to country. In general, there are no standards, and each country develops its own set of criteria for distinguishing cities or urban areas. Generally different countries of the world employ different criteria to define an urban area because the economic, political, social and cultural realities are basically different. There are several criteria used to define an urban area, (urban function of population), across the world. These are: i. Specifically named settlement. ii. Administrative status iii. A minimum population size iv. A contiguity element; include or exclude certain areas based on some criteria. v. A minimum population density vi. The proportion of population engaged in non-agricultural activities vii. Functional character-urban or rural function. Urban function focuses on secondary and tertiary activities, while rural function focusing on primary activities. Urbanization refers to the overall increase in the proportion of the population living in urban areas as well as the process by which large number of the people have become permanently concentrated in relatively small areas forming towns/cities. While specific definitions of urban differ from one country to another, in all regions urbanization has been characterized by demographic shifts from rural to cities; growth of urban population; and overall shifts in economy from farming towards industry, technology and service.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation, Urban Design, and the Environment 2003
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. CTS 03-04 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Transportation, Urban Design and the Environment: January 18, 2003 Highway 61/Red Rock Corridor 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lance M. Neckar 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Department of Landscape Architecture University of Minnesota 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 1425 University Ave S.E. Room 115 Minneapolis, MN 55414 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report is a combination of two reports (Task 1 and Task 2 and 3) on the Highway 61/Red Rock Commuter Rail Corridor. The Task 1 portion describes the baseline conditions related to subdivision-scaled growth in the corridor, with particular concentration on Cottage Grove, one of the station sites. Also considered are current plans for the downtown St. Paul Union Depot. The Task 2 and 3 portion focuses on issues relating to the relationship between transportation and the environment. An important issue in this study, therefore, is the design and institutional integration of objectives across investments in transit services at a regional scale, public space, and the long-term value of developed private space, especially in suburbia. The report offers designs for new, alternative patterns of regional growth, both urban and suburban, in broad corridors served by commuter rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Problems Confronting the Effective Creation and Administration of New Towns in the United States Richard W
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals August 2015 Legal Problems Confronting the Effective Creation and Administration of New Towns in the United States Richard W. Hemingway Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Hemingway, Richard W. (1977) "Legal Problems Confronting the Effective Creation and Administration of New Towns in the United States," Akron Law Review: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol10/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Hemingway: Legal Problems of New Towns LEGAL PROBLEMS CONFRONTING THE EFFECTIVE CREATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF NEW TOWNS IN THE UNITED STATES* RICHARD W. HEMINGWAYt INTRODUCTION TT MAY SEEM a startling statistic to some that the population in the United States is increasing at the rate of some three hundred thousand people per month.' Stated more dramatically, this increase is equal in size to the addition, during a year, of twelve cities the size of Toledo, Ohio, or, in a decade, of ten cities the size of Detroit, Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Our Towns and Cities
    The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on our towns and cities APRIL 23 1 Contents ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 About the Centre For Towns .................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 Data and methodology ....................................................................................................... 6 Aims ................................................................................................................................... 6 Data ................................................................................................................................... 6 Measuring the risk from COVID-19 ..................................................................................... 6 Structure of the report ........................................................................................................ 8 Economic exposure to COVID-19 ......................................................................................... 9 Accommodation sector
    [Show full text]
  • Fleeting Memories
    FLEETING MEMORIES Michael Ruby Published as an E-book by Ugly Duckling Presse Brooklyn, New York 2008 This is a collection of memories that popped into my mind over a period of seven years at work, as a copy editor at The Wall Street Journal, across the street from the World Trade Center. As far as I can tell, the memories came from nowhere, with no relation to the mostly political articles I was editing about the Republican takeover of Congress, the government shutdown, Monica Lewinsky, the Starr Report, the downfall of Newt Gingrich, impeachment, Florida or Bush v. Gore. Many of the memories are glimpses of places, a street corner and nothing more, as if a major function of the mind were this continuous global positioning, this continuous murmuring, “Right now, I’m at the corner of 10th Ave. and 64th St.” The places are distributed fairly evenly over the course of my life, with a somewhat disturbing precedence given to the streets around my childhood home at 251 Montrose Ave. in South Orange, N.J. I first became aware of these memories in my twenties, but it wasn’t until my mid-thirties that I really paid attention to them. A cascade began when I learned that my wife, Louisa, was pregnant with our first child, Charlotte, in 1993. A few years later, when I was taking care of identical-twin babies, Natalie and Emily, as many as three memories would pop into my mind while I was changing a single diaper. I tended to view them as memories being killed off by the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Scenarios
    Draft Report Northwest Arkansas Commuter Corridors Alternatives Analysis: Transit Oriented Development Scenarios Prepared for: Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Subconsultant to URS Corporation February 28, 2014 EPS #123044 Table of Contents 1. TRANSPORTATION-LAND USE PRINCIPLES ..................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings and Recommendations ................................................................ 1 Transit Oriented Development .................................................................................... 3 Transit Oriented Development Benefits ........................................................................ 5 Rail and Bus Rapid Transit TOD .................................................................................. 8 2. RAIL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS ................................................................... 10 Proposed Station Areas ............................................................................................ 10 Station Typologies .................................................................................................. 15 Station Area Planning Considerations ........................................................................ 19 3. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT TOOLKIT ................................................................ 28 Regional and Comprehensive Plans ........................................................................... 28 Zoning ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 270 Irvington Ave Redevelopment Plan the Township of South Orange Village, Nj
    270 IRVINGTON AVE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE, NJ UNLOCKING POTENTIAL Adopted: December 14, 2020 IN PLACES YOU LOVE 60 Union Street, #1N Newark, NJ 07105 PB 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Village President Sheena C. Collum 37 Board of Trustees Planning Board 39 44 Donna Coallier Harold Colton-Max, Chairman 45 Summer Jones Michael Lerman, Vice Chairman 53 Bob Zuckerman Jon Busch-Vogel, Village President Designee Karen Hartshorn Hilton Bob Zuckerman, Village Trustee Walter Clarke Adam Loehner, Village Administrator Steve Schnall Michael Miller Lillian Harris David Kraiker 57 Lance Freeman 64 Kate Selvin 66 Terry Richardson 66 Planning Board Planner Planning Board Counsel Greer Patras, AICP/PP William Sullivan, Esq. Planning Board Engineer Planning Board Secretary 67 Eric Keller, P.E Ojetti Davis 1 Village Administrator Adam D. Loehner 69 Prepared by 76 78 ___________________________ ___________________________ Philip A. Abramson, AICP/PP Greer Patras, AICP/PP NJ Planner License No. 609600 NJ Planner License No. 636300 270 IRVINGTON AVE 3i Redevelopment Area as PB ii4 seen from Irvington Avenue TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 . REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................................................................................................1 2. LOCAL REVELOPMENT AND HOUSING LAW........................................................................
    [Show full text]