DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks Reserve Forces Training Area Dublin, California Section 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area Dublin, California Section 3 Environmental Assessment Implementation of the Real Property Master Plan Update Parks Reserve Forces Training Area Dublin, California November 2020 Contract No. W912QR-18-D-0018 Delivery Order W912QR19F0969 Prepared for Parks Reserves Forces Training Area Dublin, California and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District Louisville, Kentucky Prepared by Jacobs Contents Environmental Assessment November 2020 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... v 1. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Purpose of the Action ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Need of the Action .............................................................................................. 1-9 1.3 Scope and Content of the EA .......................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 Decision(s) to be Made .................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5 Public and Agency Participation .................................................................................... 1-10 2. Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Description of the Proposed Action .................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Short-Range Projects .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Mid-Range Projects ............................................................................................ 2-7 2.1.3 Long-Range Projects .......................................................................................... 2-8 2.1.4 Building Demolition ............................................................................................. 2-9 2.2 No Action Alternative...................................................................................................... 2-10 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Consideration ............................. 2-10 3. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation ................................ 3-1 3.1 Resources Eliminated from Further Consideration .......................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Resources Considered in Detail ......................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................... 3-13 3.1.4 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases .................................................................. 3-13 3.1.5 Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 3-23 3.1.6 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 3-27 3.1.7 Water Resources and Water Quality ................................................................ 3-29 3.1.8 Geology, Soils and Seismicity ........................................................................... 3-45 3.1.9 Noise ................................................................................................................. 3-47 3.1.10 Transportation ................................................................................................... 3-55 3.1.11 Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste ........................................................... 3-65 3.1.12 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice .................................................... 3-66 3.1.13 Utilities and Infrastructure ................................................................................. 3-69 3.1.14 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................ 3-71 4. Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Findings ............................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Consequences of the Preferred Alternative ........................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Consequences of the No Action Alternative ....................................................... 4-1 4.2 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 5. References ................................................................................................................................... 5-1 Appendixes A Coordination Letters and Responses B Notice of 30-Day Period for Public Comment C Air Quality Emission Calculations iii Contents Environmental Assessment November 2020 Tables 2-1 Short-Range Construction Project List .......................................................................................... 2-7 2-2 Mid-Range Construction Project List ............................................................................................ 2-7 2-3 Long-Range Construction Project List .......................................................................................... 2-8 2-4 Building Demolition List ................................................................................................................. 2-9 3-1 Existing Cantonment District Land Use Categories ...................................................................... 3-2 3-2 Proposed Cantonment District Land Use Categories ................................................................... 3-7 3-3 National Ambient Air Quality Standards ...................................................................................... 3-14 3-4 Attainment Status in Alameda County and Contra Costa County .............................................. 3-18 3-5 Air Monitoring Data Summary ..................................................................................................... 3-19 3-6 Construction Emissions – Proposed Action ................................................................................ 3-21 3-7 Operation Emissions – Proposed Action .................................................................................... 3-21 3-8 Comparison of Proposed Action Emissions and General Conformity De Minimis Thresholds .. 3-22 3-9 Construction and Operational Emissions of Greenhouse Gases – Proposed Action ................. 3-23 3-10 Special-status Species and Species of Special Concern ........................................................... 3-25 3-11 Noise Levels of Construction Equipment at 50 and 100 Feet ..................................................... 3-53 3-12 Cantonment District Road Types ................................................................................................ 3-55 3-13 Planned Projects in the Vicinity of PRFTA .................................................................................. 3-72 4-1 Summary Level of Impact to Each Resource Area ....................................................................... 4-1 Figures 1-1 Site Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1-2 Cantonment District Map............................................................................................................... 1-5 1-3 Range District Map ........................................................................................................................ 1-7 2-1 Cantonment District Projects ........................................................................................................ 2-3 2-2 Range District Projects .................................................................................................................. 2-5 3-1 Cantonment District – Existing Land Use ..................................................................................... 3-3 3-2 Range District – Existing Land Use .............................................................................................. 3-5 3-3 Cantonment District – Proposed Land Use ................................................................................... 3-9 3-4 Range District – Proposed Land Use .......................................................................................... 3-11 3-5 Cantonment District – Existing Natural Resource Constraints ................................................... 3-31 3-6 Range District – Existing Natural Resource Constraints ............................................................ 3-33 3-7 Natural Resources Constraints – Proposed Conditions – Cantonment District .......................... 3-39 3-8 Natural Resources Constraints – Proposed Conditions – Range District ................................... 3-41 3-9 Green Infrastructure Plan – Cantonment District .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the Reserves’ Potential to Strengthen a Resilient and Global Britain
    Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the reserves’ potential to strengthen a resilient and global Britain May 2021 Contents Executive summary 7 Reserve Forces Review 2030 recommendations 11 Chapter 1 – Context and the imperative for change 15 Chapter 2 – Redefining the relationship between the reserves and society 25 Chapter 3 – Expanding the role of the reserves 43 Chapter 4 – Unlocking the potential of reservists 55 Chapter 5 – Transforming support to the reserves 73 Engagement log 88 Glossary 102 Reserve Forces Review 2030 3 4 Reserve Forces Review 2030 Foreword Brigadier The Rt Hon The Lord Lancaster TD VR When the Chief of the Defence Staff asked me to chair an independent review into the reserve forces, I leapt at the opportunity. For over 32 years, the Army Reserve has been an integral part of my life and perhaps the one constant of my adult years. Like many fellow reservists, my service has been part of a fairly consistent juggling act between the competing demands of a hectic professional career, private life and soldiering. In writing this foreword I recognise that so much has changed. Rather than looking ‘down and in’ at the use of The reserves have evolved from almost entirely reserves by the single services, we have been contingent forces – that trained at weekends tasked with looking ‘up and out’. and annual camps, recruited locally, and were At its heart, this Reserve Forces Review 2030 encapsulated by names such as ‘Territorial (RF30) is about people and skills, and how Army’ and ‘Royal Auxiliary Air Force’ – to the Defence, industry, government and wider reserve forces we have today across all three society can share them.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence & Public Protection
    UCD Career Development Centre DEFENCE & PUBLIC PROTECTION Sector Background An Garda Síochána Policing is a challenging and exciting role and one which continually presents new and interesting experiences. Modern policing entails much more than crime fighting. Reducing the fear of crime and working in partnership with communities are the keys to making a positive difference and improving quality of life for all citizens. Members of An Garda Síochána operate on the front line, supporting victims and witnesses, providing reassurance and instilling confidence. They are also in a position to make a proactive contribution to an area, building relationships and trust within the community. The career presents opportunities to work in a wide variety of fields including Community Policing, Traffic Control and Regulation, Public Order, Detective Duties, Organised Crime, Fraud and Drugs Offences. The Defence Forces The role of the Defence Forces is to defend the state, aid the civil power participating in United Nations missions overseas and provide a fishery protection service. The Defence Forces may be called on by Government to perform other duties in times of emergency. The Defence Forces includes the Permanent Defence Force and the Reserve Defence Force. The Permanent Defence Force ​ ● The Army ● The Air Corps ● The Naval Service The Air Corps is the air component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters at Casement Aerodrome in Baldonnel, Co. Dublin. The Naval Service is the maritime component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters located in Haulbowline, Co. Cork. The Naval Service is also the principal seagoing agency of the state and is primarily responsible for Maritime Defence and Fishery Protection but also contributes to the State’s law enforcement, search and rescue and emergency response capability.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Urban Water Management Plan
    2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN December 15, 2010 Zone 7 Water Agency Livermore, CA 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Zone 7 Water Agency 100 North Canyons Parkway Livermore, CA 94551 (925) 454-5000 Version: December 15, 2010 ZONE 7 WATER AGENCY Report Contributors: Kurt Arends, P.E. – Assistant General Manager of Engineering Boni Brewer – Public Information Officer Jarnail Chahal, P.E. – Principal Engineer Jill Duerig, P.E. – General Manager Amparo Flores, P.E. – Associate Engineer JaVia Green – Staff Analyst Matt Katen, P.G. – Principal Engineer Brad Ledesma, P.E. – Associate Engineer Robyn Navarra – Water Conservation Coordinator Sal Segura, P.E. – Associate Engineer Vince Wong, P.E. - Assistant General Manager of Operations Report Contact: Amparo Flores, (925) 454-5019, [email protected] or Brad Ledesma, (925) 454-5038, [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Previous Urban Water Management Plans ........................................................................ 1-1 1.2 The Purpose of the 2010 UWMP ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Plan Contents and Organization......................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Changes from the 2005 UWMP ......................................................................................... 1-2 2. General Service Area ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Board Study Guide Version 5.3 – 02 June, 2008
    U.S. Army Board Study Guide Version 5.3 – 02 June, 2008 Prepared by ArmyStudyGuide.com "Soldiers helping Soldiers since 1999" Check for updates at: http://www.ArmyStudyGuide.com Sponsored by: Your Future. Your Terms. You’ve served your country, now let DeVry University serve you. Whether you want to build off of the skills you honed in the military, or launch a new career completely, DeVry’s accelerated, year-round programs can help you make school a reality. Flexible, online programs plus more than 80 campus locations nationwide make studying more manageable, even while you serve. You may even be eligible for tuition assistance or other military benefits. Learn more today. Degree Programs Accounting, Business Administration Computer Information Systems Electronics Engineering Technology Plus Many More... Visit www.DeVry.edu today! Or call 877-496-9050 *DeVry University is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association, www.ncahlc.org. Keller Graduate School of Management is included in this accreditation. Program availability varies by location Financial Assistance is available to those who qualify. In New York, DeVry University and its Keller Graduate School of Management operate as DeVry College of New York © 2008 DeVry University. All rights reserved U.S. Army Board Study Guide Table of Contents Army Programs ............................................................................................................................................. 5 ASAP - Army Substance Abuse Program...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Cuts Would Impact Valley Provider
    VOLUME XLVII, NUMBER 20 Your Local News Source Since 1963 SERVING LIVERMORE • PLEASANTON • SUNOL THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010 Medical Cuts Would Impact Valley Provider By Ron McNicoll people. visits for 1000 people. Over the ple who can function at home, we see is up 25 percent from last Impacts of the revised budget Sue Compton, CEO of AXIS past couple of years in response which keeps them out of nursing year. People lose their jobs, and that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Community Health, said that the to the state budget crunch, the homes. lose insurance. We do all we can has given the Legislature will af- cuts proposed by Schwarzeneg- funding dropped to $54,000. This Often the caretaker is a family do, but we have a waiting list.” fect the Valley’s primary medical ger to help offset a $19.1 billion year the funding is $18,000, and member who needs the money AXIS tries to obtain Medi- care provider in the Valley. deficit in the coming year will im- is paying for approximately 250 to stay home all day, instead of Cal coverage for people who AXIS, which contracts with pact two of its programs. One is medical visits. going to a job. In addition to los- are coming up short on money, Alameda County, serves 14,000 the Expanded Access to Primary “We always bill out that con- ing the money, the caretakers no because obtaining it can be a patients each year, as well as Care (EAPC). The other is In tract fully. We could use twice longer would have health insur- relatively quick solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet June 2, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2020 at 1:00 PM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, effective March 31, 2020 and May 4, 2020, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/CXk-sT1N2kg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, June 1, at 3:00pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, June 1 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/92248099243.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Tactical Aerial Reconnaissance and NATO
    Swedish Tactical Aerial Reconnaissance and NATO Past, Present and Future By Professor Robert Egnell, SWE Defence University By Major Johan Jakobsson, SWE AF By Air Commodore (Retd) Garfield Porter, GBR Royal Air Force By Dag Åsvärn, Spacemetric Introduction TAR 2 capability development. Sweden’s main inter­ national effort during this period was in the Belgian Swedish Tactical Aerial Reconnaissance (TAR) has, like Congo, where an air presence was deployed, using other parts of Swedish Armed Forces’ (SwAF) capability, the reconnaissance version of the iconic SAAB 29 (The followed shifts of emphasis in doctrine and practice. In Flying Barrel).3 particular, at the end of the Cold War, it moved from a posture focusing on fending off a Warsaw Pact inva­ Although the invasion threat remained the defining sion towards greater emphasis on deployed interven­ consideration, by the ’90s there was also an increasing tions abroad. More recently, contemporary events focus on international operations, mainly driven by have also impacted on Swedish thinking, resulting in events and subsequent SwAF deployments in the a renewed focus on homeland defence whilst also Balkans. Whilst no SwAF TAR units were deployed in recog nising the need to act in concert with others. this theatre, UK Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) assets Consequently, interoperability issues will increasingly were used by Swedish troops, generating valuable play a prominent role in Sweden’s wider international tasking and user experience.4 At that time, SwAF RPA approach. Indeed, interoperability is high on the cur­ capabilities were still under development, mainly rent agenda due to both the recently ratified Host Na­ within K3, an army regiment in southern Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • We Want You As Our New Recruit |
    Johan Österberg | We want you as our new recruit | Österberg | We Johan We want you as our new recruit On 1 July 2010, conscription was made to rest in Sweden, in favor of an all- We want you as our new voluntary force, in so doing leaving a 100-year tradition. There were several reasons for this transformation of the Swedish Armed Forces (SAF), most important was the new security situation in Europe after the Cold War, which recruit 2018:8 led the SAF focusing more on participation in multinational missions abroad. Prerequisites for recruitment to and retention This thesis focuses on the recruitment and retaining of soldiers during the period when Sweden shifted the manning system for their armed forces. Results suggest in the Swedish Armed Forces that there are different incentives for staying in the SAF depending on manning system. In a conscription system, personality is a more prominent predictor of retention than in a voluntary system. The findings in this thesis emphasize the possibility to get the best from the two manning systems; to use the compulsory Johan Österberg military service as a pool for recruitment to officer programs and NCOs, and the AVF system’s work on improving the psychosocial working conditions in order to retain personnel. At the completion of this thesis, the SAF again changed the manning system, this time to a gender-neutral conscription, as the system with voluntariness failed in providing the SAF with sufficient numbers of soldiers with the right qualities. ISBN 978-91-7063-837-4 (print) ISBN 978-91-7063-932-6
    [Show full text]
  • The British Army on Bloomsday
    The British Army on Bloomsday A Military Companion to James Joyce’s Ulysses in Two Volumes by Peter L. Fishback Color Graphics in Volume I The British Army Reference for Ulysses Scholars © 2020 by Peter L. Fishback Chapter 1: History of Irish Part-Time Soldiery: The Militia, Volunteers, and Yeomanry Chapter 2: History of the British Army, Cromwell to 1853 The Jacobite Rising of 1745, Scotland Chapter 3: The Crimean War Sevastopol: Allied Positions on November 1, 1854 Chapter 4: Late Victorian Military Campaigns and Army Reform South Africa, 1795-1840 Sources: Davenport, South Africa A Modern History; Thompson, South Africa. Chapter 5: The Armies of the British East India Company [ Contains no color graphics. ] Chapter 6: Army Life and Retirement, Officers Junior Officers’ Quarters, 1903, Wellington Barracks, Dublin Military Archives, Defence Forces Ireland, IE/MA/MPD/ad134143-010, used with permission. Reproduction and distribution of this image without the authorization of the Officer-In-Charge, Military Archives, Dublin, Republic of Ireland, is prohibited. Ground Plan of a Small Officers’ Mess Richmond Barracks, Dublin UK National Archives, WO 78/3124 Chapter 7: Army Life and Retirement, Other Ranks War Office Sources: Report on the Manoeuvres Held in the Neighbourhood of Salisbury in August and September, 1898, 1899, H.C. Accounts & Papers, No. 551; Maps of 1898 Manoeuvres, U.K. National Archives, WO 279/4. Enlisted Men’s Quarters Built 1899, West Block, Wellington Barracks, Dublin Military Archives, Defence Forces Ireland, IE/MA/MPD/AD119438-001, used with permission. Reproduction and distribution of this image without the authorization of the Officer-In-Charge, Military Archives, Dublin, Republic of Ireland, is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Las Positas, Greenville, and Verona Faults, Easte
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LAS POSITAS, GREENVILLE, AND VERONA FAULTS, EASTERN ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By DARRELL G, HERD Open-file report 77-689 INTRODUCTION Livermore Valley, a large east-trending valley in eastern Alameda County, California, approximately 50 kn east of San Francisco, is unique in the central Coast Ranges, where all other major valleys trend northwest* Bounded on the west and east by two major right-lateral strike-slip fault zones the Calaveras-Sunol and the Greenville, Liverraore Valley was originally believed to be crossed by other northwest-trending faults, inferred from ground-water level differences and geophysical anomalies (California Dept. Water Resources, 1963, 1966, 1974; Wight, 1974). Recent mapping in Liverraore Valley and surrounding areas (Herd, 1975) has revealed the existence of the Las Positas fault zone, a high-angle, northeast- trending fault zone that forms the southern limit of the valley and extends from La Costa Valley, east of the Calaveras-Sunol fault zone, northeastward to the Greenville fault zone. The Las Positas fault zone is the first reported northeast-trending fault zone in the central Coast Ranges of California with a history of Quaternary movement. Purpose of map This map depicts the geologic setting of the Las Positas and Greenville fault zones, which bound Livermore Valley on the south and east, and the Verona fault, which lies southwest of Liverraore Valley. The map presents a new interpretation of the geology of Livermore Valley and adjoining areas, and contains new subdivisions of the Quaternary stratigraphy. The recency and recurrence of displacements along the three faults is assessed and an interpretation of the tectonic setting of Livermore Valley proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • AT Dublin Project Water Supply Assessment
    DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT Board of Directors NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING TIME: 6 p.m. DATE: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 PLACE: Regular Meeting Place 7051 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, CA AGENDA Our mission is to provide reliable and sustainable water, recycled water, and wastewater services in a safe, efficient, and environmentally responsible manner. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL – Members: Duarte, Halket, Howard, Misheloff, Vonheeder-Leopold 4. SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS/ACTIVITIES 5. PUBLIC COMMENT (MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC) At this time those in the audience are encouraged to address the Board on any item of interest that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board and not already included on tonight’s agenda. Comments should not exceed five minutes. Speakers’ cards are available from the District Secretary and should be completed and returned to the Secretary prior to addressing the Board. The President of the Board will recognize each speaker, at which time the speaker should proceed to the lectern, introduce him/herself, and then proceed with his/her comment. 6. REPORTS 6.A. Reports by General Manager and Staff Event Calendar Correspondence to and from the Board 6.B. Joint Powers Authority and Committee Reports 6.C. Agenda Management (consider order of items) 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7.A. Regular Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2018 Recommended Action: Approve by Motion 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Matters listed under this item are considered routine and will be enacted by one Motion, in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a Member of the Board of Directors or the public prior to the time the Board votes on the Motion to adopt.
    [Show full text]
  • MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the Tesla Road
    Draft INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the Tesla Road Winery ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Alameda County CDA Planning Division Prepared by: Denise Duffy & Associates Contact: Denise Duffy 947 Cass St. Suite 5 Monterey, California 93940 July 31, 2015 This page left intentionally blank. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: Tesla Road Winery Lead Agency: Alameda County PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), supported by the attached Initial Study (IS), evaluates the environmental effects of a proposed multi‐use wine facility at the northeast corner of the Greenville Road and Tesla Road intersection outside of Livermore, within unincorporated Alameda County, California. The applicant, RAO Company, is proposing the construction of a new 19,944 square foot (sq. ft.) building on the the property. The building’s primary function would be to provide space for wine tasting, tours, and special events, and administrative offices for employees. The building would provide a dedicated space to process wine, serve customers, and hold events. Alameda County is the lead agency for this project and has prepared this MND. FINDINGS An IS has been prepared to assess the projects potential effects on the environment and the significance of those effects. Based on the Initial Study, it has been determined that the proposed project would not have any significant effects on the environment once mitigation measures are implemented. This conclusion is supported by the following findings: 1. The proposed project would have no impact related to greenhouse gas emissions, aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards/hazardous materials, land use/planning mineral resources, population/housing, public services, and recreation.
    [Show full text]