DOCSLIB.ORG

USAIS PAMPHLET 350-6 Expert Infantryman Badge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAIS PAMPHLET 350-6 Expert Infantryman Badge USAIS PAMPHLET 350-6 Expert Infantryman Badge 07 FEBRUARY 2020 All Previous Editions Obsolete DEPARTMENTOF THE ARMY United States Army Infantry School 1 Summary of Change USAIS Pamphlet 350-6 Expert Infantryman Badge This revision, dated 07 February 2020 • W6: M18A1 Claymore Mine Option One (Electric Initiation)/M18A1 Claymore Mine Option Two (Non-electric Initiation) moved from patrol lane to weapons lane • P9: Operate PVS-14 Monocular Night Vision Device added to patrol lane • The EIB Board’s Responsibilities p.8, para e: Ensure all Candidates meet the prerequisites. Under no circumstances will the Board allow unqualified personnel, to include NON-CMF 11/18 personnel, to take part in the actual EIB (remove) train-up and testing. 2 07 FEBRUARY 2020 Table of Contents Summary of Change ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1-Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1. PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2. EVENTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 EIB Physical Fitness Assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Land Navigation .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Individual Testing Stations .............................................................................................................................................. 7 12-Mile Foot March and Final Event. .............................................................................................................................. 7 3. AUTHORITY AND STANDARDIZATION ..................................................................................................................... 7 4. EIB TEST MANAGERS ............................................................................................................................................... 7 5. TESTING ISSUES AND VIOLATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 7 6. INTENT ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 7. EXCEPTIONS AND WAIVERS .................................................................................................................................... 8 8. TEST INITIATION PROCESS ....................................................................................................................................... 8 The Commander’s Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................. 8 The EIB Board’s Responsibilities ..................................................................................................................................... 8 The EIB Test Manager’s Responsibilities ......................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2-Administration and Procedures ................................................................................................... 9 1. PREPARATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 9 Standard Concept ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Cradle to Grave Concept ................................................................................................................................................. 9 3. GRADER QUALIFICATION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 4. SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS ................................................................................................................................... 10 5. LOGISTICAL AND SITE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 10 6. CANDIDATE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................. 10 7. GRADING PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................................................ 11 8. OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 9. CANDIDATE PACKETS ............................................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 3-Pre-Execution Phase .................................................................................................................. 12 1. UNIT PREPARATION .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2. GRADER PREPARATION ......................................................................................................................................... 12 3. EIB TRAIN-UP ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 4. TEST VALIDATION .................................................................................................................................................. 13 5. TIME LINE .............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 4-Phase One: The EIB Physical Fitness Assessment ...................................................................... 14 1. CONCEPT ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 3 07 FEBRUARY 2020 2. CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 5-Phase Two: Land Navigation ..................................................................................................... 15 1. CONCEPT ............................................................................................................................................................... 15 2. CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Candidate Conditions .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Land Navigation Course Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 15 3. STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 6-Phase Three: Individual Testing Stations ................................................................................... 16 1. CONCEPT ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 2. CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 3. TESTING ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Grading .......................................................................................................................................................................... 16 NO-GOs ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Lane Tasks ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 7-Phase Four: 12-Mile
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress
    The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces June 8, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22888 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The M-4 carbine is the Army’s primary individual combat weapon for infantry units. While there have been concerns raised by some about the M-4’s reliability and lethality, some studies suggest that the M-4 is performing well and is viewed favorably by users. The Army is undertaking both the M4 Carbine Improvement Program and the Individual Carbine Competition, the former to identify ways to improve the current weapon, and the latter to conduct an open competition among small arms manufacturers for a follow-on weapon. An integrated product team comprising representatives from the Infantry Center; the Armament, Research, Development, and Engineering Center; the Program Executive Office Soldier; and each of the armed services will assess proposed improvements to the M4. The proposal for the industry-wide competition is currently before the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, and with the anticipated approval, solicitation for industry submissions could begin this fall. It is expected, however, that a selection for a follow-on weapon will not occur before FY2013, and that fielding of a new weapon would take an additional three to four years. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service The
    [Show full text]
  • To Read Article As
    He can see through walls, His Helmet is video-connected, and His rifle Has computer precision. We cHeck out tHe science (and explosive poWer) beHind tHe technology tHat’s making tHe future of the military into Halo come to life. by StinSon Carter illustration by kai lim want the soldier to think of himself as the $6 battalions. Today we fight with Small Tactical Units. Million Man,” says Colonel Douglas Tamilio, And the heart of the Small Tactical Unit is the single project manager of Soldier Weapons for the U.S. dismounted soldier. Army. In case you haven’t heard, the future of In Afghanistan, as in the combat zones of the fore­ warfare belongs to the soldier. The Civil War was fought seeable future, we will fight against highly mobile, by armies. World War II was fought by divisions. Viet­ highly adaptive enemies that blend seamlessly into nam was fought by platoons. Operation Desert Storm their environments, whether that’s a boulder­strewn was fought by brigades and the second Iraq war by mountainside or the densely populated urban jungle. enhanced coMbaT heLMeT Made from advanced plastics rather than Kevlar, the new ECH offers 35 percent more protection GeneraTion ii than current helmets. heLMeT SenSor The Gen II HS provides the wearer with analysis of explosions and any neTT Warrior other potential source This system is designed to provide of head trauma. vastly increased situational awareness on the battlefield, allowing combat leaders to track the locations and health ModuLar of their teams, who are viewing tactical LiGhTWeiGhT information via helmet-mounted Load-carryinG computer screens.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonality in Military Equipment
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Commonality in Military Equipment A Framework to Improve Acquisition Decisions Thomas Held, Bruce Newsome, Matthew W.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9-10, 2010
    Newsletter of the Utah Gun Collectors Association September 2010 UGCA Annual Dinner Meeting and ELECTION OF NEW DIRECTORS Saturday, October 9th, 5:30-8:00 PM Jeremiah/s Restaurant 1307 West 1200 North, Ogden Please RSVP ASAP! Use form on Page 3. October 9-10, 2010 UGCA - THE BEST AND CHEAPEST GUN SHOWS IN UTAH! Tables and admission to the UGCA shows only cost about half of what BEST the commercial promoters charge. UTAH SHOW! Members get a discount on tables, and free admission for themselves, spouse and minor children– leaving you more money to buy guns! Our shows have the biggest selec- tion of all types of guns from all periods. And, all the wonderful educational displays. March was a sell out, and October should be too. Tables nearly gone– act fast if you want to sell or display. Please call immediately or send in the table application on page 10 if you want a table. UGCA Board of Directors It is a good idea to reserve your tables at the show for the next Officers one. It helps save your location, and you can save $5 per table President Bill H. by reserving before the end of the previous show! Vice President/Treasurer Jimmy C. Secretary R. Carrol C. Help Wanted: UGCA is looking for a few good member volunteers: Directors 2009–2010 Jimmy C. George F. ** Ticket takers at the show Bill H. ** Coffee Pot duties at the show Dave T. ** Snack setup for table holders at the show Don W. **Solicit NRA donations at the show Gary N.
    [Show full text]
  • II-20 Weapons Qualifications
    ST. PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE OF EFFECTIVE DATE NUMBER ISSUE GENERAL ORDER April 2016 Immediately II-20 Distribution: All Employees Subject: WEAPONS QUALIFICATIONS Index as: Aerosol Subject Restraint (ASR) Firearms Qualifications, Training Annual Retraining – Weapons Firing Range ASP Less-Lethal Weapons Proficiency ASR OC Spray CEW Qualifications Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) Weapons Qualifications Accreditation Standards: 4.1.4, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 16.1.6, 33.1.5, 33.4.1, 33.5.1, CFA 4.02, 4.06, 10.04 Cross Reference: GO II-6, Take-home Vehicle Program GO II-42, Use of Force GO II-43, Lethal and Less-Lethal Weapons GO II-44 Conducted Electrical Weapon GO II-45 Firearms Range 11B-00212, F.A.C Replaces: GO II-20, Weapons Qualifications (August 28, 2017) This Order consists of the following: I. Purpose II. Policy III. Qualification Process IV. Qualification Standards V. Firearms Qualification VI. Failure to Qualify with A Department Firearm VII. Discipline Guidelines VIII. Firearms Practice IX. Firearms Training X. Less-Lethal Weapons Proficiency I. PURPOSE A. This Order establishes firearms practice, and firearms training policy. Additionally, this Order establishes weapons qualification procedures for sworn personnel and certified Reserve Officers who may be issued and/or authorized to possess firearms, ammunition and/or less-lethal weapons. B. The possession and/or handling of firearms by employees of this Department are a regular part of the duties of a Police Officer and a small number of civilian employees; i.e., the armorer, forensic technicians and property clerks. Firearms are inherently dangerous devices which require extra caution to ensure they are handled safely, and access to them is strictly controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms Training Guide
    Firearms A Training Guide For Law Enforcement Officers Wisconsin Department of Justice Law Enforcement Standards Board June 2017 The Law Enforcement Standards Board approved this textbook on June 6, 2017. Training Academy effective date is January 1, 2018. All law enforcement basic preparatory training courses that begin on or after January 1st, 2018, must incorporate this updated textbook and any related updates to the curriculum. Academies beginning before that date may elect to use these updated materials. Copyright © 2017 by the Department of Justice. All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed to the writing of this manual. The Wisconsin Department of Justice Training and Standards Bureau gratefully acknowledges the hard work and dedication of the Tactical Skills Advisory Committee, which suggested and reviewed content for the present guide. The current members of the Committee are: Designated Representatives and Practitioners: Glenn Rehberg, Training & Standards Bureau, Chair Stephanie Pederson, Training & Standards Bureau Bradley Hardel, Sheriff’s Representative Russell Jack, Chief’s Representative Andrew Kleppe, Wisconsin Technical College System Kris Perales, Wisconsin State Patrol Justin Sebestyen/James MacGillis/Al Groszczyk/Aimee Obregon, Milwaukee PD Dennis Konkel/Sarah Wronski, Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office Kimba Tieu/Chris Masterson, Madison Police Department Dennis Angle, Waukesha Police Department Mark Bauman, Eau Claire County Sheriff’s Office Steve Harlow, Milwaukee Area Technical College Mike
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Court Between
    Court File No. T-735-20 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: CHRISTINE GENEROUX JOHN PEROCCHIO, and VINCENT R. R. PEROCCHIO Applicants and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent AFFIDAVIT OF MURRAY SMITH Table of Contents A. Background 3 B. The Firearms Reference Table 5 The Canadian Firearms Program (CFP): 5 The Specialized Firearms Support Services (SFSS): 5 The Firearms Reference Table (FRT): 5 Updates to the FRT in light of the Regulation 6 Notice to the public about the Regulation 7 C. Variants 8 The Nine Families 8 Variants 9 D. Bore diameter and muzzle energy limit 12 Measurement of bore diameter: 12 The parts of a firearm 13 The measurement of bore diameter for shotguns 15 The measurement of bore diameter for rifles 19 Muzzle Energy 21 E. Non-prohibited firearms currently available for hunting and shooting 25 Hunting 25 Sport shooting 27 F. Examples of firearms used in mass shooting events in Canada that are prohibited by the Regulation 29 2 I, Murray Smith, of Ottawa, Ontario, do affirm THAT: A. Background 1. I am a forensic scientist with 42 years of experience in relation to firearms. 2. I was employed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) during the period of 1977 to 2020. I held many positions during that time, including the following: a. from 1989 to 2002,1 held the position of Chief Scientist responsible for the technical policy and quality assurance of the RCMP forensic firearms service, and the provision of technical advice to the government and police policy centres on firearms and other weapons; and b.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the Reserves’ Potential to Strengthen a Resilient and Global Britain
    Reserve Forces Review 2030 Unlocking the reserves’ potential to strengthen a resilient and global Britain May 2021 Contents Executive summary 7 Reserve Forces Review 2030 recommendations 11 Chapter 1 – Context and the imperative for change 15 Chapter 2 – Redefining the relationship between the reserves and society 25 Chapter 3 – Expanding the role of the reserves 43 Chapter 4 – Unlocking the potential of reservists 55 Chapter 5 – Transforming support to the reserves 73 Engagement log 88 Glossary 102 Reserve Forces Review 2030 3 4 Reserve Forces Review 2030 Foreword Brigadier The Rt Hon The Lord Lancaster TD VR When the Chief of the Defence Staff asked me to chair an independent review into the reserve forces, I leapt at the opportunity. For over 32 years, the Army Reserve has been an integral part of my life and perhaps the one constant of my adult years. Like many fellow reservists, my service has been part of a fairly consistent juggling act between the competing demands of a hectic professional career, private life and soldiering. In writing this foreword I recognise that so much has changed. Rather than looking ‘down and in’ at the use of The reserves have evolved from almost entirely reserves by the single services, we have been contingent forces – that trained at weekends tasked with looking ‘up and out’. and annual camps, recruited locally, and were At its heart, this Reserve Forces Review 2030 encapsulated by names such as ‘Territorial (RF30) is about people and skills, and how Army’ and ‘Royal Auxiliary Air Force’ – to the Defence, industry, government and wider reserve forces we have today across all three society can share them.
    [Show full text]
  • Oman Country Report
    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Oman Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Oman and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: AK-47 / AKM G M79 G AR 15 (M16/M4) U MBDA MILAN G Browning M 2 G Mossberg 500 U FN FAL G SIG SG540 G FN Herstal FN MAG G Simonov SKS G FN High Power U Sterling MP L2A3 G Lee-Enfield SMLE U Steyr AUG G M203 grenade launcher G Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities.
    [Show full text]
  • MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER Reliable, Portable, Lethal
    MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER Reliable, portable, lethal General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems including lightly armored vehicles and dismounted infantry. produces the MK19 MOD 3 40mm grenade machine It will penetrate 75mm rolled homogenous armor at a maxi- gun, an air-cooled, blow-back operated, belt-fed weapon. mum range of 2,050 meters. Dismounted personnel within Highly portable within small soldier units, the weapon’s a radius of 15 meters from impact will be immobilized by high lethality and broad versatility make it the prime blast and fragmentation. choice of U.S. warfighters as an essential weapon in both offensive and defensive operations. The MK19 is a reliable, portable 40mm grenade weapon system suited for light infantry vehicles and tripod applications. Firing M430A1 High Explosive Dual Purpose grenades, the MK19 provides lethal fire against a variety of targets, MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER SPECIFICATIONS s Key Features: Caliber 40mm - Sustained automatic firing MK19 Weight 77.6 pounds (35 kg) - Dual spade grips for stable control MK19 Length 43.1 inches (1,095 mm) - Removable barrel MK19 Width 13.4 inches (340 mm) - No headspace or timing adjustments required Rate of fire 325-375 rounds per minute All high velocity 40mm - Open-bolt firing eliminates cook off, enhances Ammunition NATO-qualified cooling between bursts and allows sustained 2,000 meters - area target firing at three-to-five round bursts Maximum effective range 1,500 meters - point target - Simple design for easy maintenance Maximum range 2,212 meters - Mean rounds between failure exceeds 241 meters (790 feet) Muzzle velocity 20,000 rounds per second Standard 40mm Machine Gun Product Improvements: As part of General Dynamics’ standard 40mm machine gun offering, product improvements include a set of four enhanced internal parts for increased durability and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence & Public Protection
    UCD Career Development Centre DEFENCE & PUBLIC PROTECTION Sector Background An Garda Síochána Policing is a challenging and exciting role and one which continually presents new and interesting experiences. Modern policing entails much more than crime fighting. Reducing the fear of crime and working in partnership with communities are the keys to making a positive difference and improving quality of life for all citizens. Members of An Garda Síochána operate on the front line, supporting victims and witnesses, providing reassurance and instilling confidence. They are also in a position to make a proactive contribution to an area, building relationships and trust within the community. The career presents opportunities to work in a wide variety of fields including Community Policing, Traffic Control and Regulation, Public Order, Detective Duties, Organised Crime, Fraud and Drugs Offences. The Defence Forces The role of the Defence Forces is to defend the state, aid the civil power participating in United Nations missions overseas and provide a fishery protection service. The Defence Forces may be called on by Government to perform other duties in times of emergency. The Defence Forces includes the Permanent Defence Force and the Reserve Defence Force. The Permanent Defence Force ​ ● The Army ● The Air Corps ● The Naval Service The Air Corps is the air component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters at Casement Aerodrome in Baldonnel, Co. Dublin. The Naval Service is the maritime component of the Defence Forces with its base and headquarters located in Haulbowline, Co. Cork. The Naval Service is also the principal seagoing agency of the state and is primarily responsible for Maritime Defence and Fishery Protection but also contributes to the State’s law enforcement, search and rescue and emergency response capability.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Army, Dod § 578.68
    Department of the Army, DoD § 578.68 (2) Badges may be approved and (vii) The Guard, Tomb of the Un- awarded in the field only by the com- known Soldier Identification Badge (an manders authorized to award the re- item of organizational equipment); spective badge. (viii) Army ROTC Nurse Cadet Pro- (3) Award of badges to Active Army gram Identification Badge; personnel which cannot be resolved by (ix) Drill Sergeant Identification local commanders will be forwarded Badge; through command channels to HQ, (x) U.S. Army Recruiter Identifica- USA HRC, (see address § 578.3(c)). tion Badge; (c) Posthumous awards. When an indi- vidual who has qualified for a badge (xi) Career Counselor Badge; dies before the award is made, the (xii) Army National Guard Recruit- badge may be presented to the next of ing and Retention Identification kin. Badge; (d) Retroactive awards. Retroactive (xiii) U.S. Army Reserve Recruiter awards of the Combat Infantryman Identification Badge. Badge and the Combat Medical Badge (2) Items not issued or sold by the may be made to fully qualified individ- DA: uals. Such awards will not be made ex- (i) Identification badges, except as cept where evidence of injustice is pre- provided in paragraph (g)(1) of this sec- sented. Active duty soldiers will for- tion; ward their applications through com- (ii) Lapel buttons for badges; mand channels to HQ, AHRC, (see ad- (iii) Certificates for badges; dress § 578.3(c)). Reserve Component (iv) Foreign badges; soldiers should address their applica- (v) Miniature Combat Infantryman, tion to Commander, USA HRC–St. Louis, One Reserve Way, St.
    [Show full text]