EPPO Reporting Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles -
Agapanthus Gall Midge – Update 29 July 2015 (Hayley Jones, Andrew Salisbury)
Agapanthus Gall Midge – update 29 July 2015 (Hayley Jones, Andrew Salisbury) The agapanthus gall midge is a new undescribed pest affecting Agapanthus that belongs to the Cecidomyiidae family of flies. The tiny gall midge lays eggs which develop into maggots inside the individual flower buds or inside the closed scapes. The maggots can then cause the bud to be deformed and discoloured and often fail to open. The severity of this can range from a couple of buds failing to collapse of the entire flower head. Infestation can be confirmed by opening the buds or flower heads and looking for the presence of small maggots 1-3mm in length which are a creamy yellow colour. The midge larvae leave the flower head to overwinter and pupate in the soil. The species of midge causing this problem is undescribed (new to science). Consequently, very little is known about the biology and lifecycle of this insect and so the entomology team at Wisley have launched a project to study it. Page 1 of 3 Statutory action Fera have informed us that following a Plant Health Risk Group meeting the agapanthus gall midge will be added to the UK Plant Heath Risk Register. Fera intend to follow up with statutory action against findings on commercially traded plants. The Plant Health and Seed Inspectorate have indicated that they will commence a targeted survey of nurseries in the near future. They call for the targeted survey and awareness raising to help determine the distribution of the midge and scope for actions to mitigate impacts. AHDB are also aware of the midge. -
The Genus Platycerium
428 FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, 1961 Table III. The effects of fumigants and varieties on the weight (lbs,) of conns produced per 100 ft, of row in 1960. Varieties White Elizabeth Spic & Florida Fumigant Fumigants Excelsior the Queen Span Friendship Pink Means Mylone 23.5 38.1 35.4 41.6 47.7 37.3 38.1 Vapam 26.7 32.9 41.2 40.1 49.7 Check 18.5 30.8 30.8 35.7 41.2 31.4 Variety 46.2 means 22.9 33.9 35.8 39.1 L.S.D 0.05 0.01 Between fumigant means 3.9 5.9 Between variety means 3.7 4.9 The failure of the fumigated plots to Either 75 gallons per acre of Vapam or 300 produce more corms than the untreated plots pounds of active Mylone applied two weeks in 1960 is believed to have resulted in part prior to planting is recommended for the from the fact that the untreated plots were production of cormels on sandy soils of Florida. kept relatively weed free throughout the LITERATURE CITED growing season by hoeing. During the two pre 1. Burgis, D. S. and A. J. Overman, 1956. Crop produc vious seasons, the untreated plots became tion in soil fumigated with crag mylone as affected by heavily infested with Bermuda grass and weeds rates, application methods and planting dates. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 69:207-210. in the latter part of the season. The beneficial 2. Burgis, D. S. and A. J. Overman, 1957. Chemicals effects of the fumigants during 1960 are re which act as combination herbicides, nematicides and soil fungicides: I. -
Klicken, Um Den Anhang Zu Öffnen
Gredleria- VOL. 1 / 2001 Titelbild 2001 Posthornschnecke (Planorbarius corneus L.) / Zeichnung: Alma Horne Volume 1 Impressum Volume Direktion und Redaktion / Direzione e redazione 1 © Copyright 2001 by Naturmuseum Südtirol Museo Scienze Naturali Alto Adige Museum Natöra Südtirol Bindergasse/Via Bottai 1 – I-39100 Bozen/Bolzano (Italien/Italia) Tel. +39/0471/412960 – Fax 0471/412979 homepage: www.naturmuseum.it e-mail: [email protected] Redaktionskomitee / Comitato di Redazione Dr. Klaus Hellrigl (Brixen/Bressanone), Dr. Peter Ortner (Bozen/Bolzano), Dr. Gerhard Tarmann (Innsbruck), Dr. Leo Unterholzner (Lana, BZ), Dr. Vito Zingerle (Bozen/Bolzano) Schriftleiter und Koordinator / Redattore e coordinatore Dr. Klaus Hellrigl (Brixen/Bressanone) Verantwortlicher Leiter / Direttore responsabile Dr. Vito Zingerle (Bozen/Bolzano) Graphik / grafica Dr. Peter Schreiner (München) Zitiertitel Gredleriana, Veröff. Nat. Mus. Südtirol (Acta biol. ), 1 (2001): ISSN 1593 -5205 Issued 15.12.2001 Druck / stampa Gredleriana Fotolito Varesco – Auer / Ora (BZ) Gredleriana 2001 l 2001 tirol Die Veröffentlichungsreihe »Gredleriana« des Naturmuseum Südtirol (Bozen) ist ein Forum für naturwissenschaftliche Forschung in und über Südtirol. Geplant ist die Volume Herausgabe von zwei Wissenschaftsreihen: A) Biologische Reihe (Acta Biologica) mit den Bereichen Zoologie, Botanik und Ökologie und B) Erdwissenschaftliche Reihe (Acta Geo lo gica) mit Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie. Diese Reihen können jährlich ge mein sam oder in alternierender Folge erscheinen, je nach Ver- fügbarkeit entsprechender Beiträge. Als Publikationssprache der einzelnen Beiträge ist Deutsch oder Italienisch vorge- 1 Naturmuseum Südtiro sehen und allenfalls auch Englisch. Die einzelnen Originalartikel erscheinen jeweils Museum Natöra Süd Museum Natöra in der eingereichten Sprache der Autoren und sollen mit kurzen Zusammenfassun- gen in Englisch, Italienisch und Deutsch ausgestattet sein. -
SEYCHELLES KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS Output 6: Patterns Of
GOS- UNDP-GEF Mainstreaming Biodiversity Management into Production Sector Activities SEYCHELLES KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS Output 6: Patterns of conservation value in the inner islands by Bruno Senterre Elvina Henriette Lindsay Chong-Seng Justin Gerlach James Mougal Terence Vel Gérard Rocamora (Final report of consultancy) 14 th August 2013 CONTENT I INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 4 I.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 4 I.2 AIM OF THE CURRENT REPORT ........................................................................... 5 II METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 6 II.1 AMOUNT AND TYPES OF DATA COMPILED ........................................................... 6 II.1.1 Plants ............................................................................................................. 6 II.1.2 Animals .......................................................................................................... 9 II.2 EXPLORATION INDEX ...................................................................................... 10 II.3 BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION INDEX ...................................................... 11 III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................13 III.1 PATTERNS OF EXPLORATION ............................................................................ 13 III.1.1 -
Annotated Checklist of the Gall Midges from the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle
annotated checklist of the gall midges from the netherlands, belgium and luxembourg (diptera: cecidomyiidae) Hans Roskam & Sébastien Carbonnelle The gall midges are one of the most important groups of gall makers. Emerging larvae produce stimuli and the host plant responds by producing galls, fascinating structures which provide food and shelter for the developing larvae. Most gall inducing midges are host specific: they are only able to induce galls in a few, often related, plant species. A few species have different feeding modes: among them are saprophagous, fungivorous and predaceous species and some are used in biocontrol. We recorded 416 species in the whole area; 366 species are recorded from the Netherlands, 270 species from Belgium and 96 species from Luxembourg. importance, in the 8th volume in the series by introduction Barnes (1946-1969) and published eleven papers Over more than a century M.W. Beijerinck (1851- (1957-1999) on gall midges new for the Dutch 1931), J.C.H. de Meijere (1866-1947) and W.M. fauna, and, last but not least, was responsible for Docters van Leeuwen (1880-1960) wrote impor- the cecidomyiids in the Checklist of the Diptera tant papers about plant galls in the Netherlands. of the Netherlands by Beuk (2002). Nijveldt’s Dutch checklists of Diptera started with Bennet collection of microscope slides, more than 5,600 & van Olivier (1825, with all species placed in specimens, 4,300 of Dutch origin, mainly collected Tipula). Checklists of cecidomyiids were started by, by himself, but also by De Meijere and Van der e.g., Van der Wulp (1859, 18 spp.), Van der Wulp Wulp during the second half of the 19th, and first & De Meijere (1898, 63 spp.) and De Meijere half of the 20th century, and also included in the (1939), with many supplements (e.g., De Meijere Naturalis collection, is a second main reference 1946). -
Index to Cecidology up to Vol. 31 (2016)
Index to Cecidology Up to Vol. 31 (2016) This index has been based on the contents of the papers rather than on their actual titles in order to facilitate the finding of papers on particular subjects. The figures following each entry are the year of publication, the volume and, in brackets, the number of the relevant issue. Aberbargoed Grasslands: report of 2011 field meeting 2012 27 (1) Aberrant Plantains 99 14(2) Acacia species galled by Fungi in India 2014 29(2) Acer gall mites (with illustrations) 2013 28(1) Acer galls: felt galls re-visited 2005 20(2) Acer saccharinum – possibly galled by Dasineura aceris new to Britain 2017 32(1) Acer seed midge 2009 24(1) Aceria anceps new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Aceria geranii from North Wales 1999 14(2) Aceria heteronyx galling twigs of Norway Maple 2014 29(1) Aceria ilicis (gall mite) galling holm oak flowers in Brittany 1997 12(1) In Ireland 2010 25(1) Aceria mites on sycamore 2005 20(2) Aceria populi galling aspen in Scotland 2000 15(2) Aceria pterocaryae new to the British mite fauna 2008 23(2) Aceria rhodiolae galling roseroot 2013 28(1): 2016 31(1) Aceria rhodiolae in West Sutherland 2014 29(1) Aceria tristriata on Walnut 2007 22(2) Acericecis campestre sp. nov. on Field Maple 2004 19(2) Achillea ptarmica (sneezewort) galled by Macrosiphoniella millefolii 1993 8(2) Acorn galls on red oak 2014 29(1) Acorn stalks: peculiar elongation 2002 17(2) Aculops fuchsiae – a fuchsia-galling mite new to Britain 2008 23 (1) Aculus magnirostris new to Ireland 2005 20 (1) Acumyia acericola – the Acer seed -
Gall Midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of South Tyrol (Italy) - Summary of Results and Zoogeographical Analysis
Gredleriana Vol. 10 / 2010 pp. 275 - 324 Gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of South Tyrol (Italy) - summary of results and zoogeographical analysis Gallmücken (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Südtirols – zusammenfassende Resultate und zoogeographische Analyse Marcela Skuhravá and Václav Skuhravý Abstract At present the gall midge fauna of South Tyrol includes 311 species in 68 genera. A total of 271 species are valid and 40 species, still undescribed, are identified to the generic level. Investigations were carried out at 124 localities at altitides from 250 m a.s.l. at Salurn to 2581 m a.s.l. at Schaubachhütte in the Ortler Range during the period 1999-2009. Zoogeographical analysis is based on 2150 records, of which 200 were obtained by earlier researchers and 1950 records of the present authors. Until 1996 only 24 species were known to occur in South Tyrol. We enriched the faunal list of South Tyrol by adding 287 species and the faunal list of Italy by 114 species. A list of gall midge species and a list of host plants attacked by gall midges are given. Diversity ranged from 3 to 36 species at a single locality. On average we determined 15 species to occur per locality in South Tyrol. Species number declines with increasing elevation. Density is high at 189 species per 1000 km2. South Tyrol is one of the best explored areas of the world for galls of Cecidomyiidae. Frequency of occurrence: 49 % species occur very rarely, 21 % rarely, 17 % moderately frequently, 9 % frequently, 4 % very frequently. Iteomyia capreae is the most frequently recorded species in South Tyrol. -
Introduction
BLUMEA 27 (1981) 175-201 Sturcture and ontogeny of Stomata in Polypodiaceae U. Sen & E. Hennipman Rijksherbarium, Leiden Summary The stomata as occurring on the fronds of the sporophytes of a large number of Polypodiaceae s.s. (Filicales) are investigated. A number of different stomatal types is recognised, (newly) described, and their ontogeny investigated. The different types of stomata are discussed in relation to their possible for in significance tracing phylogenetic relationships the Polypodiaceae following a cladistic analysis. Introduction The ferns presently included in the Polypodiaceae (i.e. Polypodiaceae sensu Copeland, 1947, but excluding the taxa transferred elsewhere by Crabbeet al., 1975) are basically epiphytic and almost wholly tropical in distribution. They are characterised the ofexindusiate by possession sori, sporangia with a stalk composed of more than one but always less than fourrows of cells, and bilateral spores with a The more or less distinct perispore. family with its vast wealth of species and generous diversities has undergone many taxonomic vicissitudes and splitting especially since the timeof Diels (1902) and Christensen(1905). Many heterogenous elements like the dipteroids, cheiropleuroids, loxogrammoids and grammitoids have meanwhilebeen removed from it, yet the family has not attained reasonable taxonomic differ the stability. Pteridologists not only on propriety of retention of some of the remaining members in the family, but also on the recognition and delimitationof of its ofwhich many genera some appear ill-defined.Disagreements prevail even about the position of the family in relation to other ferns (Holttum, 1973; De la Sota, 1973, and Pichi Sermolli, 1977). These taxonomic disagreements due are certainly to our ignorance about the true phylogenetic relationships of this family. -
Plant Health and Biosecurity: the Landscape Consultant’S Toolkit
Plant Health and Biosecurity: The Landscape Consultant’s Toolkit LI Technical Guidance Note 01/19 This guidance helps practitioners apply biosecurity principles to their work Contents 1) Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2) The Landscape Consultant’s role in the biosecurity continuum ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3) General principles ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 4) Preparation of brief, including proJect feasibility and landscape assessment .................................................................................................................................... 6 5) Landscape Design & Specification ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 6) Landscape Construction and Handover ........................................................................................................................................................................................... -
Plants Toxic to Horses
Plants Toxic to Horses Adam-and-Eve (Arum, Lord-and-Ladies, Wake Robin, Starch Root, Bobbins, Cuckoo Plant) | Scientific Names: Arum maculatum | Family: Araceae African Wonder Tree () | Scientific Names: Ricinus communis | Family: Alocasia (Elephant's Ear) | Scientific Names: Alocasia spp. | Family: Araceae Aloe () | Scientific Names: Aloe vera | Family: Liliaceae Alsike Clover () | Scientific Names: Trifolium hybridum | Family: Leguminosae Amaryllis (Many, including: Belladonna lily, Saint Joseph lily, Cape Belladonna, Naked Lady) | Scientific Names: Amaryllis spp. | Family:Amaryllidaceae Ambrosia Mexicana (Jerusalem Oak, Feather Geranium) | Scientific Names: Chenopodium botrys | Family: Chenopodiaceae American Bittersweet (Bittersweet, Waxwork, Shrubby Bittersweet, False Bittersweet, Climbing Bittersweet) | Scientific Names: Celastrus scandens| Family: Celastraceae American Holly (English Holly, European Holly, Oregon Holly, Inkberry, Winterberry) | Scientific Names: Ilex opaca | Family: Aquifoliaceae American Mandrake (Mayapple, Indian Apple Root, Umbrella Leaf, Wild Lemon, Hog Apple, Duck's Foot, Raccoonberry) | Scientific Names:Podophyllum peltatum | Family: Berberidaceae American Yew (Canada Yew, Canadian Yew) | Scientific Names: Taxus canadensus | Family: Taxaceae Andromeda Japonica (Pieris, Lily-of-the-Valley Bush) | Scientific Names: Pieris japonica | Family: Ericaceae Angelica Tree (Hercules' Club, Devil's Walking Stick, Prickly Ash, Prickly Elder) | Scientific Names: Aralia spinosa | Family: Araliaceae Apple (Includes crabapples) -
Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) For: Summary and Conclusions of The
Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) for: Agapanthus gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) November 2015 Summary and conclusions of the rapid PRA The agapanthus gall midge, which is new to science, is a damaging pest of Agapanthus. In June 2015, the pest was added to the Plant Health Risk Register and it was decided that statutory action should be taken against findings of the agapanthus gall midge on commercially traded plants. At this time, the midge had only been recorded at three sites in southern England. The midge has now been found to have spread widely across the south of England and has been recorded in West Yorkshire. A PRA has therefore been initiated to see if statutory action in trade is still justified. Risk of entry The agapanthus gall midge is already present in the UK, and is suspected to have arrived from southern Africa where Agapanthus is native, possibly on plants for planting or cut flowers. However, there are no official records of the midge outside of the UK and Guernsey. Therefore, entry has been rated as likely with medium confidence. Risk of establishment The agapanthus gall midge is already established in the UK and is widespread in the south of England. There has also been a record of the agapanthus gall midge in a garden in West Yorkshire. It seems likely that the midge can establish wherever Agapanthus is grown. Therefore, establishment has been rated as very likely with high confidence. 1 Economic, environmental and social impact Larval feeding within flower buds can lead to the discolouration and deformation of the buds, and generally causes them to not open, while larvae that feed between developing stems within the flower head sheath can lead to the collapse of the entire flower head.