An Interview with the Armchair Economist, Steven Landsburg
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POLICY Volume 29 No. 1 • Autumn 2013 ideas • debate • opinion CONTENTS FEATURES: 3 Over-Regulation is Stifling Australia’s Media 43 Target 30: Reducing the Burden for Future Generations Ian Robertson Simon Cowan The current regulatory framework is broken, with poor prospects for reform. A campaign to reduce government spending below 30% of GDP within the next 10 years 8 Moochers Making Movies: Government Assistance to the Film Industry Gene Tunny INTERVIEW Governments should not chase the overseas film production dollar. 46 The Armchair Economist Steven Landsburg, author of The Armchair Economist, 16 Why Economists Succeed (or Fail) to Influence talks about making economics accessible to a general Policy audience. Peter Shergold Research findings get lost in translation between 53 Security in Sri Lanka academia and public administration. Dayan Jayatilleka speaks to Sergei DeSilva-Ranasinghe about the security situation in Sri Lanka. 21 How Economists Succeed (and Fail) to Influence Policy Stephen Kirchner BOOK REVIEWS Can economists do well and do good?. 57 The Modest Member: The Life and Times of 25 The Tribes that Hire the PhD Bert Kelly Dan Klein By Hal Colebatch Academic hiring perpetuates ideological outlooks. Reviewed by Stephen Kirchner 28 James Buchanan: An Assessment 58 Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Geoffrey Brennan Approach to the Firm Buchanan taught us to focus on the rules of the By Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein game. Reviewed by Barry Maley 34 Crony Capitalism Adam Creighton 61 The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression The Tea Party and Occupy movements can find common ground in opposing crony capitalism. By Angus Burgin Reviewed by Brian Doherty 39 Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence Stephanie Jarrett 63 Redefining the Poverty Debate: Why a War on Stephanie Jarrett on the event that motivated her to Markets is No Substitute for a War on Poverty research and write about violence against Aboriginal By Kristian Niemietz women. Reviewed by Andrew Baker POLICY staff Editor-in-Chief & Publisher: Greg Lindsay Editor: Stephen Kirchner Assistant Editor: Mangai Pitchai Design & Production: Ryan Acosta Subscriptions: Kerri Evans and Alicia Kinsey We are pleased to announce that Dr Stephen Kirchner is taking over as the Editor of Policy magazine. Dr Kirchner is well known to Policy Policy Magazine readers, having been a frequent contributor over many years. He is also Ph: +61 2 9438 4377 • Fax: +61 2 9439 7310 known to many through his Institutional Economics blog and op-ed Email: [email protected] contributions to The Australian and the Australian Financial Review. He is ISSN: 1032 6634 ideally suited to the role and we eagerly await his first edition. Please address all advertising enquiries and correspondence to: Dr Kirchner is Research Fellow at The Centre for Independent Studies The Editor and a former Senior Lecturer in the School of Finance and Economics, Policy University of Technology Sydney Business School He has worked as a PO Box 92 St Leonards NSW 1590 Australia financial market economist with Action Economics LLC and was Director of Economic Research with Standard & Poor’s Institutional Market © 2013 The Centre for Independent Studies Limited Services, based in Sydney and Singapore. He has also worked as an Level 4, 38 Oxley Street, St Leonards, NSW adviser to members of the Australian House of Representatives and ABN 15 001 495 012 Senate. He has published in leading academic journals, including Public Cover images: © Ambro10, Hocusfocus | Dreamstime.com Choice and the Australian Economic Review. Printed by Ligare Pty Ltd Distributed by Gordon & Gotch Australia Dr Kirchner holds a BA (Hons) from the Australian National University, and Gordon & Gotch New Zealand. a Master of Economics (Hons) from Macquarie University, and a PhD in The Editor welcomes unsolicited submissions. All full-length economics from the University of New South Wales. articles (other than reproductions) are subject to a refereeing process. Permission to reproduce articles may be given upon With the new editor, there will be a number of initiatives designed to application to the Editor. enhance future issues of Policy. Editorial Advisory Council In addition to the existing print edition, the Winter 2013 issue of Policy Professor James Allan, Professor Ray Ball, includes a new digital edition that will be accessible on the web and a Professor Jeff Bennett, Professor Geoffrey Brennan, Professor Lauchlan Chipman, Professor Kenneth wide range of tablet and other devices The digital edition will be fully Clements, Professor Sinclair Davidson, Professor searchable and better integrated with social media. It will also enable an David Emanuel, Professor Ian Harper, Professor Helen Hughes, Professor Wolfgang Kasper, Professor improved digital archive of back issues. The digital edition will replace Chandran Kukathas, Professor Tony Makin, Professor the current emailed pdf for online-only subscribers, but will also be Kenneth Minogue, Professor R.R. Officer, Professor Suri available to other subscribers. CIS will be in touch with subscribers in Ratnapala, Professor David Robertson, Professor Razeen Sally, Professor Steven Schwartz, Professor Judith Sloan, the near future with a sample edition. The new digital edition will improve Professor Peter Swan, Professor Geoffrey de Q. Walker. the reader experience and make Policy more accessible to a wider range Policy is a quarterly publication of The Centre for of readers. Independent Studies in Australia and New Zealand. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect Policy is open to feature articles, interviews, review essays and book the views of the Centre’s staff, advisers, directors, or officers. reviews covering a wide range of policy issues and ideas from any disciplinary perspective. Feel free to get in touch with Stephen to discuss POLICY is a publication of any ideas you may have at [email protected]. We are also open to The Centre For Independent Studies. inquiries from potential advertisers. The Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) is Australia’s leading independent public policy institute. Its major Contributor deadlines are as follows: concern is with the principles and institutions underlying a free and open society. Spring 2013: 30 July CIS believes in: Summer 2013–14: 30 October • individual liberty and choice, including freedoms of association, religion, speech, and the right to property Further information for contributors and subscribers can be found at • an economy based on free markets www.policymagazine.com. • democratic government and the rule of law • the importance of an autonomous and free civil society CIS promotes its vision by fostering public debate about major social, constitutional, and economic issues. Policy has been the flagship publication for the CIS for many years, To remain independent of government influence on and we look forward to your company as we continue our tradition of its activities and direction, the Centre relies on untied exploring ideas and public policy challenges from a classical liberal contributions from individuals, companies, and charitable trusts, and income from the sale of its publications. perspective. Greg Lindsay For information on CIS membership, Policy Executive Director subscriptions, and other CIS publications and events, please visit our website at www.cis.org.au or: The Centre for Independent Studies ph: +61 2 9438 4377 • fax: +61 2 9439 7310 email: [email protected] FEATURE OVER-REGULATION IS STIFLING AUSTRALIA’S MEDIA The current regulatory framework is broken, with poor prospects for reform, argues Ian Robertson hen the Broadcasting Services the 55 legislative concepts that form the basis of Act (BSA), which regulates current Australian media regulation and found broadcasting and online services the majority to be either ‘broken or under in Australia, was passed by significant strain.’ ParliamentW in 1992 it totalled fewer than 100 pages. Today it is 10 times that length. The Convergence Review The BSA was intended to be a significant In December 2010, Minister for Communications departure from the previous regime of detailed Stephen Conroy announced the Convergence and complex black letter law and an adversarial Review. At the time of releasing the terms of approach to regulation and enforcement. The reference for the review he said: ‘The government Act aimed to substantially free up broadcasting recognises that regulatory measures designed in regulation in Australia with a much lighter touch the 1980s may not be the most appropriate for approach, and an emphasis on co-regulation and the 21st century.’ appropriate flexibility to meet ever-changing The Convergence Review Committee was circumstances. And for a while it did. established in early 2011 with Glen Boreham, However, regular complex amendments to a former managing director of IBM Australia the BSA in the 20 years since have significantly and current chair of Screen Australia, as its chair. increased its length and made parts of it similar The terms of reference for the review covered a to income tax law in the complexity of their broad range of issues, including media ownership provisions. Much of this complexity stems from laws, media content the BSA’s underlying principles of strong standards, local content restrictions on ownership and control, and rules, and the allocation extensive anti-avoidance provisions to prevent of radiocommunications them from being circumvented. Other restrictions spectrum. in the BSA are intended to stifle competition. The review set out The very detailed provisions restricting the on a deregulatory path activities of datacasters are an example—they have operated effectively to ensure that datacasting has not occurred in Australia. And the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is the regulator Ian Robertson heads the media, responsible for the BSA and 25 other Acts and entertainment and communications 523 pieces of regulation that regulate much of practice of Holding Redlich, and Australia’s media, itself recognises that the current was from 1997 to 2004 a part-time media regulatory model is substantially flawed.